A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy

































   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


Obama to announce most
expansive gun-control
agenda in generations

Washington Post, by Philip Rucker

Original Article

Posted By:Dreadnought, 1/15/2013 10:09:25 PM

President Obama on Wednesday will formally announce the most aggressive and expansive national gun-control agenda in generations as he presses Congress to mandate background checks for all firearm buyers and prohibit assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition clips. The announcement will set off a fierce confrontation with Congress over an issue that has riven American society for decades. Obama’s far-reaching firearms agenda has at best tepid support from his party leaders and puts him at loggerheads with Democratic centrists.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: LanieLou, 1/15/2013 10:55:20 PM     (No. 9119021)

It´s very simple, actually. Make any crime comitted with a gun a federal offense. Right now, the bad guys can lawyer there way out of jail time.

But it´s not about stopping crime. Sadly.


Reply 2 - Posted by: lana720, 1/15/2013 10:58:41 PM     (No. 9119029)

How effective are enforceable are EOs?
Are they comparable to laws that are passed?
Will the Tenth Amendment spare us this invasion of individual States´ Rights?


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: mercedesops, 1/15/2013 11:10:38 PM     (No. 9119052)

Obama wants to kill us with cheap,light weight Obamamobiles and by taking away our ability to defend ourselves. Who is going to be the 21st Century John Brown?


Reply 4 - Posted by: busterman, 1/16/2013 12:06:02 AM     (No. 9119108)

He may very well be the first President in history to start a second term with articles of impeachment already brought against him.


Reply 5 - Posted by: LAW428, 1/16/2013 12:41:57 AM     (No. 9119127)

Hey, Doofus, good luck with all your Imperial Dictator executive orders! No one elected you to trash our Constitution and our Nation in the process. You´re the #1 Enemy of the State!
Our Founders knew what to do with people like you!


Reply 6 - Posted by: Bobn.T, 1/16/2013 12:57:17 AM     (No. 9119136)

I think our founding father would hang him for treason.


Reply 7 - Posted by: Topic Thunder, 1/16/2013 3:35:29 AM     (No. 9119199)

He was very wise to grant himself armed protection for life. He must have some good reason to think he will need it.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Spidey, 1/16/2013 3:44:59 AM     (No. 9119206)

These exe orders will go to a court no sooner than the ink is dry on them.Supposedly obama is a Constitutional scholar but missed the classes on "shall not infringe".

They´re using this tragedy to push the envelope on Obama´s powers.Using kids as props on this is disgraceful and sickening.Any parent who lent their kid for this photo op should lose their citizenship over aiding and abetting a constitutional overthrow by a president.For all we know,there´s 10 kids not on that stage because they were wiped out by an abortions.

Obama cares about kid´s safety so much but didn´t bat an eye over a botched abortion babies dying in a utility closet.


Reply 9 - Posted by: kanphil, 1/16/2013 6:27:12 AM     (No. 9119266)

This is one issue where cowardly, sell-out politicians will not decide.. the people will decide and the people will prevail!


Reply 10 - Posted by: Mr. Hanky, 1/16/2013 6:39:13 AM     (No. 9119279)

It´s a distraction from the spending and liberal policies that are destroying this nation. Bread and circuses.


Reply 11 - Posted by: lillehuset, 1/16/2013 6:54:57 AM     (No. 9119299)

whatever happened to ......Jobs, Jobs, Jobs......as the number one priority........


Reply 12 - Posted by: sagman, 1/16/2013 6:55:36 AM     (No. 9119300)

Stephanopoulos: Why’s Biden presenting the recommendations instead of the President?
Williams: Dunno. Now, live, from the White House, Vice President Joe Biden, surrounded by children from across the country.

Biden: Mornin’, everyone. So, wonderin’ why ole Joe’s here, not the Boss? Well, yesterday he says, ´´Joe, I can’t expend capital on this one. Take the blowback for me, and. . . .´´ Hey kids, quit fidgetin’ and look up at me like we showed you.

Anyway, I gotta coupla VP Executive Orders here. Perfectly legal: the Chief’s playin’ golf, and Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution gives me power when he’s incapacitated.

Let´s get to it

Order 1: Firearms and ammunition manufacturers, bow and arrow makers, Walmart, Cabela’s, gun shops—-do your thing, but you can only sell to us Feds and drug cartels.

Order 2: Mandatory turn-in. Everything. Hand ‘em over or go to jail. And we know who has what. The NSA hasn’t been twiddling its thumbs the last four years.

Confiscated weapons will be used to equip the president’s new Civilian National Security Force, saving taxpayers a bundle.

You slip somethin’ by us, and maybe shoot a mugger or home invader, you’re lookin’ at hard time.

Order 3: Hunters, register your slingshot or boomerang, you’re good to go.

Order 4: Priests and shrinks: you record everybody you talk to, send the tapes to the FBI. They’ll take it from there.

That’s it. I’m askin’ video game makers and Hollywood to keep the violence down, but only askin’. Not gonna infringe on their First Amendment rights. Hey, you see Django? Did that rock or what? I. . . .

Jay Carney: Thank you, Mr. Vice President.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: Janjan, 1/16/2013 6:58:34 AM     (No. 9119305)

The American people cannot accept this unconstitutional power grab. Obama is out of control and if the Republicans are unwilling to stick their worthless political necks out to stop him than the rest of us will.


Reply 14 - Posted by: rabbit, 1/16/2013 7:01:24 AM     (No. 9119308)

If you read the article, the president has no intention of trying to do everything via executive order. And there are clearly some things that he can do via executive order, such as tell the Dept. of Justice to better enforce existing laws, or request a study of gun violence.

It is a fact that it is too easy for psychotic individuals to get hold of guns today. I have yet to hear any suggestions from the gun-rights lobby as to how to make it more difficult for this tiny segment of the population to get hold of guns.


Reply 15 - Posted by: The Patriot Code, 1/16/2013 7:03:08 AM     (No. 9119311)

Talk about The Regime´s gun control agenda! Go to YouTube and search for Sandy Hook Conspiracy. It will blow your mind. Make sure your tin foil hat is securely in place.


Reply 16 - Posted by: Judge, 1/16/2013 7:23:31 AM     (No. 9119331)

Its time for the GOP to grow a pair, and I agree with # 10 on the distraction. Ive been saying that all along


Reply 17 - Posted by: Gorzabozo, 1/16/2013 7:32:30 AM     (No. 9119340)

Re #14: " there are clearly some things that he can do via executive order, such as tell the Dept. of Justice to better enforce existing laws, or request a study of gun violence."

Does it really take an executive order for the Justice Dept to do thier jobs, or should the Justice Dept follow the law as the Constitution provides?

Re #14 again: "It is a fact that it is too easy for psychotic individuals to get hold of guns today. I have yet to hear any suggestions from the gun-rights lobby as to how to make it more difficult for this tiny segment of the population to get hold of guns."

Keeping psycos off the streets via institutionalization worked for centuries; until a bunch of leftists convinced enough of us sane persons otherwise. If psychos are locked up, then psychos cannot obtain firearms. (or knives, or chains, or lead pipes, or....on and on.) We dont need more gun control, we need more crazy-persons control.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: privateer, 1/16/2013 7:37:43 AM     (No. 9119350)

lagomorph´s almost funnier than sagman.Th Tyrant Hussein will use EOs until he can get Enabling Acts.


Reply 19 - Posted by: Catherine, 1/16/2013 7:45:54 AM     (No. 9119364)

From your mouth to God´s ears.


Reply 20 - Posted by: Britvah1, 1/16/2013 7:49:56 AM     (No. 9119369)

Oh yeah. Tell the Justice Dept to do a better job of enforcing the law. That should do it.

Maybe he should start though by telling them to quit breaking the law themselves. And start enforcing the immigration laws while they´re at it. Rump swab.


Reply 21 - Posted by: Coy860, 1/16/2013 7:50:35 AM     (No. 9119370)

Anyone who watches the circus with Obama today, take a GOOD look at those children, and be reminded that they already are growing up less free than we did, will be saddled with debt, and will NEVER experience the RIGHT to own a gun with a 10 round magazine, heck, may not even be allowed to own a firearm period.
I am sick of the twisted language..all guns are firearms..UNTIL they are used to shoot someone, then they become assault weapons.


Reply 22 - Posted by: Bad Dog, 1/16/2013 7:51:46 AM     (No. 9119374)

I´ve said this before:

The more things they make illegal, the more of us will become criminals. Automatically. Just like that - stroke of a pen.

The more freedoms we lose, the more power they gain.

The more power they gain, the more freedoms we´ll lose.

Karl is beaming from his grave:
´Workers of all lands, unite!´ and ´The philosophers have only interpreted the world in various ways - the point, however, is to change it´.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: texaspast, 1/16/2013 7:53:20 AM     (No. 9119379)

FTA: These steps include enhanced federal scientific research on gun violence and a modernized federal database system to track guns, criminals and the mentally ill.

And there´s the point. To be better able to locate every gun so that it can be taken away when the time comes. It may not come immediately, but those who would enslave us think in the long terms, and ´never let a crisis go to waste.´


Reply 24 - Posted by: Crosscut, 1/16/2013 8:01:42 AM     (No. 9119399)

Time for impeachment proceedings in the House. This pipsqueak needs his chain jerked. This punk needs to be taken to the woodshed. House Democrats are risking political suicide sticking by this dude.


Reply 25 - Posted by: Mazeman, 1/16/2013 8:08:51 AM     (No. 9119416)

#14 More people are killed by drunken drivers than by guns. Do you propose banning cars? Limiting their horsepower? Of course not. It´s not the car´s fault. The effort should be toward identifying the potential offenders and either rehabilitating or punishing them as appropriate.


Reply 26 - Posted by: Captain Howdy, 1/16/2013 8:21:07 AM     (No. 9119441)

I guess what the founders really meant was "shall not be UNREASONABLY infringed"


Reply 27 - Posted by: LZK, 1/16/2013 8:22:18 AM     (No. 9119443)

I heard a commentator say -- We are only as good as our government -- WHAT?

No -- No -- WE the people are as good as it gets. This country has been a shining beacon to those of US who wanted Freedom from tyranny. I passed that Lady in the harbor and I knew my family had a chance to live a good life....

Soooooo -- all you media/types -- good luck with trying to convince US that the Washington elite are in charge. They may write a we bills and huff and puff at the podium -- but -- at the end of the day they can only "lead" those of US who will follow.

AND -- my dears -- I´m not going there....My core values don´t match their whinnnning. I follow the Constitution given to US by the founding Fathers.

LZK


Reply 28 - Posted by: Lonestar Jack, 1/16/2013 8:24:23 AM     (No. 9119448)

I am all for background checks if they first make all Congressmen and Presidential candidates go through one.

Also they should be required to take a written test about the Constitution that they are going to swear to uphold and be liable for any broken promises they make while in office.

This is no more than I have to do to get a concealed carry license and I have to pay for it without government help.


Reply 29 - Posted by: stryker714, 1/16/2013 8:37:06 AM     (No. 9119486)

Aren´t EO´s only binding as long as the president is in office, like #2 mentions?

One day we´ll convene the families of the Mexicans murdered by F&F guns and the relatives of the deceased re Benghazi at Obama´ sentencing for treason, high crimes and misdemeanors; gun running and negligent homicide being more specific.

This meeting will have way more impact than any kids who wrote letters. Obama has a direct tie to these above mentioned deaths, unlike the false cause and effect the DC commies are pushing in linking law abiding American gun owners to Sandy Hook.

Let´s make it official: Obama will be showing his Middle Eastern side today.


Reply 30 - Posted by: braincramp, 1/16/2013 8:56:54 AM     (No. 9119526)

Poster #15 suggested going to YouTube to look for ´´Sandy Hook Conspiracy´´ and I looked at a 30 minute video with the most views found here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d516tIViRLI
It blew the tin foil hat clean off my head and now I feel sick to my stomach.


Reply 31 - Posted by: Speedypetey, 1/16/2013 9:17:42 AM     (No. 9119567)

When you have government hacks that have never held a real private sector job defining what an assault gun is or a magazine capacity and then say anyone should be able to vote without an ID, you know they do not have any grasp on reality. Because if you were really interested in children wouldn´t you want to be arresting those the violate existing law and removing repeat offenders from society. Instead of making more laws to include more law abiding citizens. And who do you think they will persecute? I will ignore the laws and just go on as normal. His orders will go down as the most disregarded in history.


Reply 32 - Posted by: Blue-Z-Anna, 1/16/2013 9:20:46 AM     (No. 9119573)

"Cammo Guy" running through the woods behind the school has disappeared from the record ?

Bushmaster found in trunk ?

Coroner is a phony plant ?

Whole thing is a planned anti-gun psy-ops like F&F ?

CNN will have to be as smooth as Walter Payton to get down the field without touching any of this.

I´m fashioning a new and improved tinfoil hat at the moment.....quite stylish too, IMHO.


Reply 33 - Posted by: Eheu Fugaces, 1/16/2013 9:29:56 AM     (No. 9119590)

Obama wouldn´t know an "assault weapon" from a Daisy Beebee gun.

When guns are outlawed, we´ll all be outlaws -- except for a few folks in the upper West Side of Manhattan, Brooklyn Heights, and of course, rich commies like Soros who can afford to hire armed bodyguards.


Reply 34 - Posted by: Memphis, 1/16/2013 9:40:25 AM     (No. 9119616)

People are mad and they are also scared.


Reply 35 - Posted by: AnnaS, 1/16/2013 10:33:20 AM     (No. 9119779)

People are smart to be scared #34! Everyone here and other conservative sites are screaming, BUT Obama does what he wants and NOBODY stops him or even seems to know how! PLUS Rasmussen reports that most of the people support the Democrats in this power grab and stomping of the Constitution!


Reply 36 - Posted by: chicodon, 1/16/2013 10:49:25 AM     (No. 9119833)

Obama studied enough law to not brazenly defy the Constitution with EO´s. Whatever he does will be in a gray areas and under the table. I could be wrong but we´ll see. He´s as Slick as Willie.


Reply 37 - Posted by: coldoc, 1/16/2013 11:02:24 AM     (No. 9119861)

I agree with some other posters. We are not addressing the problem, which is crazy people. We have created a whole generation of "psychologically adjusted" people who have been on mind/mood altering medication all their lives. These people should not have access to guns. That includes all the lazy/too busy parent ritalin babies who have graduated to stronger stuff. Lets hear exactly what lanza was on. Nobody´s talking. Hmmmm.


Reply 38 - Posted by: TexasRose, 1/16/2013 11:10:45 AM     (No. 9119893)

I stopped halfway thru the youtube video when I saw the picture of Obama holding who they said was the little girl shot - I wanted to see if that was true. Here is a link showing that it´s not the little girl who was shot, but her sister. Apparently, the pic showing the whole family, and, altho the sister looks very similar, she is not the same. That makes the whole thing suspicious to me: http://metabunk.org/threads/1054-Debunked-Emily-Parker-Still-Alive-after-Sandy-Hook


Reply 39 - Posted by: TexasRose, 1/16/2013 11:11:48 AM     (No. 9119899)

The picture showing the whole family is an OLD picture. Sorry.


Reply 40 - Posted by: jt26, 1/16/2013 11:17:27 AM     (No. 9119917)

Obama always needs to be the smartest guy in the room. That is why he will be surrounding himself with children (and Joe Biden) today.
The Mocha Mobster will learn the hard way that the real 3rd rail of American politics is the right to bear arms. Attempt to infringe on that and you open a giant can of whoop ass.


Reply 41 - Posted by: Ribicon, 1/16/2013 11:18:28 AM     (No. 9119918)

They came for our high-capacity flush toilets and we did nothing. Then they came for our high-wattage light bulbs and we were silent. Next...


Reply 42 - Posted by: suziesuburbanite, 1/16/2013 11:24:05 AM     (No. 9119932)

Make that 250,001 members


Reply 43 - Posted by: artlover, 1/16/2013 11:26:39 AM     (No. 9119937)

Are you really surprised that Obama is doing this??? He is going to do more than this. We are now a socialist country with no freedoms. Forget trying to fight it. It will never work. He is in control now. That is final and HE will tell you so.


Reply 44 - Posted by: Roberto 22, 1/16/2013 11:29:14 AM     (No. 9119946)

Perhaps the next time Obie proclaims the Republicans are forcing him to reduce spending, he should trot out "The children" to demonstrate who will be destroyed by his stupid desire to spend us into obliteration...


Reply 45 - Posted by: mamafrog, 1/16/2013 11:41:38 AM     (No. 9119979)

Obama has 35 million friends on Facebook, the National Rifle Association has 2 million. Yes, that does matter.


Reply 46 - Posted by: BaseballFan, 1/16/2013 11:57:06 AM     (No. 9120021)

Drudge now reporting the number of EOs is up to 23.


Reply 47 - Posted by: trapper, 1/16/2013 11:58:54 AM     (No. 9120031)

Hahahahahaha. The White House is having a conniption over the NRA ad that points out that the Obama children have ARMED Secret Service protection, yet Obama OPPOSES armed guards for OUR children.

Nothing but net on that one. Way to go, NRA!


Reply 48 - Posted by: bifgroovey, 1/16/2013 12:10:29 PM     (No. 9120063)

Restriciton on # of bullets. Hope you aren´t invaded by a gang of 3 or more...


Reply 49 - Posted by: bifgroovey, 1/16/2013 12:12:54 PM     (No. 9120069)

The solution? Strip law keeping citizens of liberty.

Criminals will, of course, continue to not comply with the law.

Chicago has a gun ban. Murder capital of U.S.


Reply 50 - Posted by: strike3, 1/16/2013 12:24:07 PM     (No. 9120096)

The Clown Prince is finally going to feel a pushback to his insane power grabs. He is already scared and that´s why he had Biden do the dirty work. Financial losses are expected and, for the most part, tolerated from this thief. Guns, not so much. The loss of a gun means so much more than an empty holster.


Reply 51 - Posted by: Liberal like Jefferson, 1/16/2013 12:32:54 PM     (No. 9120119)

#14 - the existing laws already PREVENTED the Newtown killer from obtaining a firearm when he applied to buy one. So, he stole the ones he used from his mother.

He illegally acquired the guns from an overprotective parent and violated the gun-free school zone laws when he arrived on school grounds. He then proceeded to break the laws against cold-blooded murder.

What laws are "common sense" and how do they prevent irrational acts?


Reply 52 - Posted by: bighambone, 1/16/2013 12:35:07 PM     (No. 9120127)

Remember when the liberal gun control advocates used to talk about banning "assault rifles"?

Notice that they no longer do that, and now want to ban what they refer to as "assault weapons". Some of them admit that they define "assault weapons" as any semi-automatic handgun or rifle that can possible accept a clip or magazine that can hold over 10 rounds of ammunition, in New York it is now down to 7 rounds.

Such a broad definition would encompass just about all the modern firearms produced and sold in America today. If such a ban were passed, nationwide what would keep the gun banners from coming back after the next mass shooting to ban all "assault weapons" that contain a magazine that hold 5 rounds or 3 rounds? or even banning all firearms that can accept any sort of a detachable magazine?

About all of these mass shootings are perpetrated by crazy people who set out on a personal suicide mission, and they know that the way to surely gain nationwide attention for themselves is to murder a lot of innocent people before they take their own lives. You will never hear the liberal Democrats and their gun control allies talk about those dangerous mentally ill people other then to refer to them as victims, because they know that while guns have no vote, the mentally ill can vote and do vote mostly for liberal Democrats.


Reply 53 - Posted by: alaskaal, 1/16/2013 12:43:01 PM     (No. 9120153)

Thank you for watching over us, Oh beneficent King! You are so wise above the ways of mortals! Bless thee Oh King! Or, you could go have an impossible sex act with yourself.


Reply 54 - Posted by: shamrock, 1/16/2013 12:45:33 PM     (No. 9120157)

Stupid comment #45. I, among others that I know, get nowhere near facebook, but we are all members of the NRA. I don´t care how many "friends" bammy has, you and the bunny are probably on there 100 times.


Reply 55 - Posted by: Polecat49, 1/16/2013 1:19:05 PM     (No. 9120273)

I guess obama´s facebook friends and democRATS are just waiting for a replay of Germany in the 1930s. hitler got all the guns registered, set up a few awful events, then took all the guns and started exterminating unwanted masses. Included in those exterminated masses were thousands of Germans who helped put, and keep him in power.



Post Reply   Close thread 719176




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"



Democrats push problem
solvers in House contests
Washington Post, by Paul Kane    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:38:26 PM     Post Reply
Democratic Party officials believe that Kevin Strouse is exactly the kind of candidate who can help them retake the House next year. He’s a smart, young former Army Ranger — good qualities for any aspiring politician. But what party leaders really like is that Strouse doesn’t have particularly strong views on the country’s hottest issues. Immigration? Tax policy? “Certainly I have a lot of research to do,” Strouse acknowledged in an interview Thursday as he announced his candidacy in a suburban Philadelphia House district. Strouse’s candidacy reflects an emerging

Texas prosecutors’ slayings
unnerve rural Kaufman County
Washington Post, by Stephanie McCrummen    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:33:08 PM     Post Reply
KAUFMAN, Tex. — The judge was on the phone. “Yep, I said I’ll do anything,” Bruce Wood told the person on the other end, rubbing his forehead. “They asked me to do a eulogy. I don’t know what I’m going to say.” Elsewhere in the Kaufman County Courthouse, a sheriff’s deputy was handing out bulletproof vests. “I brought the smallest one,” he said to a secretary, who stared at the khaki armor as he explained how to adjust the side straps should the need arise. “These have the neck for a female.” Outside, two armed guards

Vanishing workforce
weighs on growth
Washington Post, by Jim Tankersley    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:28:59 PM     Post Reply
Put out an all-points bulletin: Millions of Americans have gone missing from the workforce. Every month that those would-be workers are gone raises the odds that they might never come back, dimming the prospects for future economic growth. The vanishing trend is more than a decade old, but it accelerated during the Great Recession. Throughout 2012, economists held out hope that it had stopped. But then came Friday’s jobs report, and hopes were dashed. The Labor Department reported that the U.S. labor force — everyone who has a job or is looking for one — shrank

A Reporter Explains Why
Gun Coverage Is So Biased
Power Line, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 9:13:14 PM     Post Reply
Well, not intentionally. But Jim Ragsdale of the Minneapolis Star Tribune attended a conference in Chicago on covering gun issues, which he describes this way: “Covering Guns” brought reporters with front-line experience covering mass shootings in Tucson, Ariz.; Aurora, Colo.; Newtown, Conn., and Red Lake, Minn., to meet with gun experts and advocates and gun trainers. Sponsored by the Poynter journalism center and funded by the McCormick Foundation of Chicago, we gathered in a city that witnessed 506 homicides last year. The idea, I take it

Report: Carbon Emissions
in US Lowest Since 1994
PJ Media, by Rick Moran    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 9:03:02 PM     Post Reply
Carbon emissions in the US were at their lowest level in 2012 since 1994, according to figures released by the US Energy Information Administration. We did it without carbon trading scams, the EPA making carbon dioxide a poison, or obeying the dictates of the Kyoto climate Treaty. We did it partly because of decreased economic activity as a result of the Obama recovery-that-isn’t, but mostly because of good old fashioned market forces; competition between natural gas and coal: Energy-related carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in 2012 were the lowest in the United States since 1994

Video: Parents Turn on Fossil-
Fuel Protesters at Tufts
National Review Online, by Stanley Kurtz    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 8:33:04 PM     Post Reply
When I tell campus horror-stories like “What’s the Matter With Vassar?” people ask if parents know what’s going on at these schools. I don’t think they want to know. But guess what happens when protesters step on others’ rights in full view of parents? Tufts has one of the most active campus fossil-fuel divestment groups. Lately these protesters have been infiltrating orientation sessions and campus tours for prospective students, mostly high school juniors traveling with their parents. Climate protesters interrupt these recruitment activities with questions

Behind the Dismal Jobs Numbers:
The ‘New’ Economy Takes Shape
PJ Media, by Rick Moran    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 8:27:24 PM     Post Reply
It is amazing just how wrong economists were in their predictions for the number of jobs that were to be created in March. The “consensus” figure was 200,000 — a far cry from the actual number created which was 88,000. Totally “unexpected,” as usual. In one way, you can’t blame them. After a better than average gain in February of 236,000 (revised upward this month to 268,000), along with some positive numbers in housing and consumer spending, there were no doubt many analysts who began breathing a sigh of relief and believing that the long-awaited jobs recovery was upon us.

The New Climate Deniers?
American Thinker, by David Lawrence    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 9:33:09 AM     Post Reply
Rich Lowery in the New York Post (4-02-2013) accuses the liberals of being the new climate deniers, considering that they don´t recognize that there´s been no global warming for the last fifteen years. This shouldn´t surprise Lowery. When the liberals hang onto the neck of a cause, they don´t let go. They have ignored murders, rapes, wars, nuclear proliferation, and everything wrong with the world to focus in on their little area -- the horror of carbon emissions. You´d think liberals would have learned from their earlier panic about overpopulation

Obama’s feeble salary ‘sacrifice’
Washington Post, by Dana Milbank    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/5/2013 11:13:50 PM     Post Reply
“President Obama plans to give up 5 percent of his salary this year to draw attention to the financial sacrifice of more than 1 million federal employees who will be furloughed.” — The Washington Post, April 4 “Here’s the plan. We get the warhead and we hold the world ransom for 1 MILLION DOLLARS !” — Dr. Evil in “Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery” At the annual White House Easter Egg Roll this week, President Obama decided to shoot some hoops with the kids. He wound up going 2 for 22. The abysmal field-goal percentage — 9 percent

Johns Hopkins’s and Planned
Parenthood’s troubling extremism
Washington Post, by George F. Will    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/5/2013 11:05:52 PM     Post Reply
We know Johns Hopkins University is devoted to diversity, because it says so. Its “Diversity and Inclusion Statement,” a classic of the genre, says the university is “committed to sharing values of diversity and inclusion .?.?. by recruiting and retaining a diverse group of students.” Hopkins has an Office of Institutional Equity and a “Diversity Leadership Council” that defines “inclusion” as “active, thoughtful and ongoing engagement with each other.” Unless you are a member of Voice for Life (VFL), an antiabortion group. Hopkins’s Student Government Association has denied VFL status

Obama budget would cut entitlements
in exchange for tax increases
Washington Post, by Zachary A. Goldfarb and Karen Tumulty    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/5/2013 11:02:41 PM     Post Reply
President Obama will propose a budget next week that embraces a risky strategy of courting Republicans for a grand bargain on the debt while angering Democratic allies with cuts to the nation’s entitlement programs. White House officials said Friday that Obama’s budget would cut Medicare and Social Security and ask for less tax revenue than he has previously sought. The budget, to be released Wednesday, will fully incorporate the offer Obama made to House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) during December’s “fiscal cliff” talks — which included $1.8 trillion in deficit reduction through spending cuts and tax increases.

NRA tactics erode post-Newtown
support for gun-control measures
Washington Post, by Tom Hamburger    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/5/2013 11:00:22 PM     Post Reply
Sen Mark Begich declared a “sea change” in the politics of gun control immediately after the school shooting in Newtown, Conn., telling his local newspaper that he would not hesitate to buck the powerful National Rifle Association. But in the months since, the gun rights group has made itself impossible for the Alaska Democrat, and many other lawmakers, to resist. Begich has signed on as a co-sponsor of a bill, drafted in consultation with the NRA, that would change the way mental illness is reported in the background check system — a measure that critics say



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



´My bangs are getting
a little irritating´: Michelle
Obama admits she already regrets
her high-maintenance hairdo

63 replie(s)
Daily Mail (UK), by Margot Peppers    Original Article
Posted By: pineledger- 4/7/2013 7:43:42 AM     Post Reply
Michelle Obama has admitted that she is already tired of the bangs she first sported in January. The First Lady said in an interview with Entertainment Tonight: ´Bangs are a day-by-day proposition. They´re starting to grow out, get a little irritating.´ Still, she hasn´t let her hairdo woes get her down. ´It´s okay,´ she said after her initial complaint. ´We´ll be good.´ The first indication that her hairstyle was becoming a burden came about last weekend, when Malia, 14, was spotted adjusting her mother´s hair during the White House Easter Egg Roll.

Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney
General´ Comment Was a Gaffe

62 replie(s)
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM     Post Reply
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that

We are living in a dying country (Thread 2)
61 replie(s)
Rushlimbaugh.com, by Rush Limbaugh    Original Article
Posted By: LComStaff- 4/7/2013 6:49:54 AM     Post Reply
This is the second thread of an article posted yesterday which can be found here:http://lucianne.com/thread/?artnum=730032

McCain: ´I don´t understand´
GOP filibuster on guns

56 replie(s)
Politico, by Jennifer Epstein    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/7/2013 12:18:14 PM     Post Reply
Sen. John McCain says he doesn´t understand the threats from some of his Republican colleagues to filibuster a bill on background checks to buy guns. "I don´t understand it," the Arizona Republican said on Sunday of the threat coming from Sen. Rand Paul,Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen. Mike Lee and nine other Republicans. "The purpose of the United States Senate is to debate and to vote and to let the people know where we stand.” "What are we afraid of? ... If this issue is as important as we all think it is, why not take ... it up and debate?"

Hillary Clinton Would Not
´Clear the Field´ for 2016

41 replie(s)
New Republic, by Tod Lindberg    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/6/2013 5:22:36 AM     Post Reply
No one is more preoccupied these days with Hillary Clinton´s 2016 plans than the Beltway political class—not even the former presidential candidate herself. To hear some tell it, her decision will be dispositive for all other Democrats thinking of entering the race. And pundits and reporters aren´t the only ones positing the "The Hillary Factor": No less than the House Democratic whip, Steny Hoyer, told BuzzFeed, “I don´t know that anybody would run against Hillary…. If she runs, she clears the field.” It´s an understandable conclusion, given Clinton´s stature in the Democratic Party and her 70 percent

Obama critic apologizes for
his ´poorly chosen words´
on gay marriage

41 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington DC], by Alexandra Jaffe    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/6/2013 12:18:19 PM     Post Reply
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson, considered by some to be a potential Republican contender for president, apologized to Johns Hopkins University for the "poorly chosen words" he used in expressing his opposition to gay marriage last month.“I am sorry for any embarrassment this has caused,” Carson said in the letter, reported in New York Magazine.(Snip) "Although I do believe marriage is between a man and a woman, there are much less offensive ways to make that point. I hope all will look at a lifetime of service over some poorly chosen words.” Carson will remain as commencement speaker at Johns Hopkins,

Mother Of Slain Benghazi
Officer To Sean Hannity:
‘They Want Me To Shut Up’

39 replie(s)
Mediaite, by A.J. Delgado    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:00:16 AM     Post Reply
On Friday, Sean Hannity brought Pat Smith, mother of the late Sean Smith, on his radio program. The 34-year-old information management officer was one of four Americans murdered in the Benghazi embassy attack on September 11, 2012. In the chilling interview, a distraught Ms. Smith, in tears, pleaded for answers and spoke of the efforts to silence her. Ms. Smith first relayed how her son, prior to the attack, requested additional security in advance and warned the State Department: He did tell them, ahead of time, he typed it into his little typewriter over there,

Vanishing workforce
weighs on growth

38 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Jim Tankersley    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:28:59 PM     Post Reply
Put out an all-points bulletin: Millions of Americans have gone missing from the workforce. Every month that those would-be workers are gone raises the odds that they might never come back, dimming the prospects for future economic growth. The vanishing trend is more than a decade old, but it accelerated during the Great Recession. Throughout 2012, economists held out hope that it had stopped. But then came Friday’s jobs report, and hopes were dashed. The Labor Department reported that the U.S. labor force — everyone who has a job or is looking for one — shrank

White House Blames Jobs
Numbers on Sequester

36 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Wynton Hall    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/5/2013 8:02:58 PM     Post Reply
The Obama White House is scrambling to blame Friday’s abysmal March jobs numbers on the sequester’s trimming of the rate of growth in federal budgets that have yet to fully commence. After the Labor Department announced that a mass exodus of 663,000 workers left the U.S. workforce last month and that job creation fell 112,000 jobs short of projections, Obama’s top economic adviser Alan B. Krueger, took to the White House blog to blame the sequester: It is important to bear in mind that the March household and payroll surveys are the first monthly surveys to look

The Secrets of Princeton
35 replie(s)
New York Times, by Ross Douthat    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 8:08:09 AM     Post Reply
Susan Patton, the Princeton alumna who became famous for her letter urging Ivy League women to use their college years to find a mate, has been denounced as a traitor to feminism, to coeducation, to the university ideal. But really she’s something much more interesting: a traitor to her class. Her betrayal consists of being gauche enough to acknowledge publicly a truth that everyone who’s come up through Ivy League culture knows intuitively —

Beyonce, Jay-Z celebrate 5th
anniversary in Havana, Cuba

32 replie(s)
Los Angeles Times, by Nardine Saad    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 4/6/2013 8:20:04 AM     Post Reply
Beyonce and Jay-Z celebrated their fifth wedding anniversary in Cuba this week. The couple, who married on April 4, 2008, took in the sights of Old Havana, visited a school, dined on a rooftop terrace and strolled the fan-filled streets in their island best.(snip).The power couple declined to answer journalists´ questions about their visit to the island nation, but some outlets are reporting that the moguls are there as tourists, though that would be illegal because of the half-century embargo the U.S. has on the Communist country. However, the Miami Herald said Washington has issued special licenses for

Obama Budget to Cap Retirement
Accounts at $3 Million

30 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Tony Lee    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/5/2013 9:40:39 PM     Post Reply
The budget President Barack Obama will submit on April 10 will contain a proposal that would prohibit individuals from accumulating more than $3 million in Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) and tax-preferred retirement accounts. According to a White House statement, the Obama administration believes the current rules allow some wealthy individuals "to accumulate many millions of dollars in these accounts, substantially more than is needed to fund reasonable levels of retirement saving." "The budget would limit an individual’s total balance across tax-preferred accounts to an amount sufficient to finance an annuity of not more than $205,000 per


Post Reply   Close thread 719176





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS