 A Message From Lucianne
Now More Than Ever Get Your Eagles Up! Lucianne Tees - in Black or White Click to Buy
|
|
Conservatives gone wild
New York Post, by John Podhoretz
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:StormCnter, 1/4/2013 5:15:49 AM
|
| The most passionately anti-Obama Republican politicians and activists consider themselves the truest and purest of conservatives, and often unleash their scorn and fury on others who also call themselves conservative but differ on strategy and tactics. But in the realm of philosophy, “conservatism” from Thomas Hobbes onward is a worldview dedicated to order and tradition and the proposition that disorder is dangerous and deadly. Thus, it is the opposite of “conservative” to embrace chaos instead of order. It is the opposite of “conservative” to embrace crisis rather than accept unpleasant realities.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
bearcat, 1/4/2013 5:35:03 AM (No. 9097706)
Thank you.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
lostinmassachusetts, 1/4/2013 6:18:05 AM (No. 9097724)
John Podhoretz seems to be parroting the Democrat strategy for 2014--accuse the Republicans of causing chaos in the government.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Sfacheem, 1/4/2013 6:28:47 AM (No. 9097734)
No, John Podhoretz is speaking the truth. There are a lot of conservatives out there who think the speaker has a magic wand that he can wave and do what no one can do: change the dynamics on capital hill to what they would be had the Republicans won the white house and senate. He is in a "no win" position. His party couldn´t win the election and therefore controls only one-half of one branch of government, but he is supposed to drive policy? It doesn´t work that way. Welcome to reality, you spoiled nincompoops.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Janjan, 1/4/2013 6:31:07 AM (No. 9097738)
Boehner put himself in this position to begin with by secretly crafting this ´fiscal cliff´ drama prior to the election. What did he think was going to happen? Did he really think Obama was going to make some good faith effort to cut spending? I am not a political strategist but I am smart enough to have that one figured out. Sorry Podhoretz but we have every reason to be livid about this so save your lectures.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
floridagator, 1/4/2013 6:35:39 AM (No. 9097744)
That´s right, John ... damn those "conservatives." Just who the hell do they think they are? /s
His first sentence is indicative of his whole life and philosophy. He is a chubby little coward who calls out others who he says "consider themselves the truest and purest conservatives" yet doesn´t name names. It is not "them," it is John Podhoretz who unleashes his whiny little bitchy scorn when someone dares to differ on strategy and tactics. And, Johnny Boy, those you wish to demean are on the front line, not sissy men like you who have made a career out of throwing bombs from a distance. It´s guys like you who think they´re better than the rest of us, therefore, we have no right to disagree with you. He is the type of crybaby who, when you disagree with him, will call you an anti-Semite. He´s a punk, not a warrior, and his time is over. No more little speech writing for presidents or sternly worded columns, John. Your support for the establishment guys helped get us where we are now. Your opinion means nothing to me anymore.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Starlady, 1/4/2013 6:45:22 AM (No. 9097756)
I think the new generation of Conservatives would agree that the signifying characteristic of the old generation of conservatives is their ability to CAVE. I don´t consider that anything to admire or desire. If you can´t get the job done leave.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
JAN, 1/4/2013 7:04:54 AM (No. 9097779)
#3 explains the situation perfectly.
Speaking of dupes.......those who buy into the purity demands only further facilitate the left´s agenda of destruction.
If we pull apart rather than pull together we accomplish nothing.
Those that rant against Boehner do so to keep their own personal ratings up by pandering to those who ignore the reality of our world situation.
The mid terms are coming. If we can gain control of the senate we may be able to influence the next Justice on the Supreme Court.
Let´s keep fighting among ourselves so we can lose more senate seats.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Rakasha, 1/4/2013 7:16:03 AM (No. 9097793)
Alright, you win. I concede the term ´conservative´. I absolve myself from fiddling with this ridiculous argument while my country and its Constitution burn. As I no longer consider myself a ´Republican´, I will no longer consider myself a ´conservative´. I am now a Radical.
Just for the record, before the definition game gets started:
RADICAL, adj. 1. of, relating to, or proceeding from a root
2. of or relating to the origin : fundamental
3. favoring extreme changes in existing views, habits, conditions, or institutions
4. advocating extreme measures to retain or restore a political state of affairs
RADICALISM, n. The conservatism of tomorrow injected into the affairs of today.
You miss a very important point, Mr. Podhoretz. Sometimes disorder and chaos are a messy but necessary part of restoring the order that should be.
I will take the chaos of freedom over the order of vassalage any day, and I take great umbrage at the idea that current political reality requires that I and my children wear chains - ´just for a little while´. There was much more that the speaker - and others in the House - could have done. One big thing would have been to get the public´s awareness much earlier, while they still had a fighting chance of presenting something reasonable to be voted on. Media blackout is no excuse. There are commercials, there are billboards, there is the internet, there are street corners! But that would have cost them something and they are not willing to pay. That´s for us to do.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Teleologicus, 1/4/2013 7:24:11 AM (No. 9097806)
Lacking the ins and outs and not appreciating the difficulties, it is nevertheless difficult to be impressed or feel secure with the current Republican leadership. They aren´t very good at getting their message out and across to the public. Sometimes I wonder if they even understand that this is now the name of the game. They seem to think that the way it works is that politicians huddle and talk among themselves and then announce their decisions to the rest of us. Obama and the Democrats know better and are always talking to the public. Republicans are just props for them. Boehner and others on our side sometimes seem completely clueless as to what is actually going on. It is not that Democrats are not negotiating in good faith. They are not negotiating at all. The whole thing is for show - and Reublicans have so far been playing along with it and acting like they actually believe negotiation of some kind is going or or about to begin.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Bad Dog, 1/4/2013 7:25:55 AM (No. 9097810)
´´This is anarchism, not conservatism.´´
Welcome to our hell, Mr. Podhoretz. We´ve recognized this for some time. To refer to John Boehner´s ´´fellow conservatives´´ is a joke.
Call it purity if you want, but SOMEONE has to hold true to the definitions of what we´re ALL supposed to stand for! Democrat-Lite and continually leaning leftward will have us voting totally socialist in no time - that´s if we´re even ALLOWED to continue voting. After all, the super-smarts of our nation have DONE SO WELL (bah!) getting us out of every mess THEY CREATE.
I hereby nominate post #8 as Best Post on Any Thread Whatsoever, To Date. Right on, #8.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
reilly, 1/4/2013 7:36:06 AM (No. 9097820)
Ah, come on. Forget the stupid last week. Lower rates are locked in for most people. The debt ceiling fight will be fought on our own turf. What´s Barry gonna do, raise taxes? He just did. Now he´s going to have to cut spending. It´s the Alamo for our side. Stop fighting among ourselves. Most Americans know it´s the spending that´s killing us. Just forget the Pravda media and hang tough. It´s the perfect time in the biennial for this fight.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
49 Ford, 1/4/2013 8:11:57 AM (No. 9097878)
Our side´s inability to get its message out is a chronic problem of many years standing. In truth, we haven´t been willing/able to do so since RR left the White House and Lee Atwater passed on. To expect a few congresscritters of the defeated party to get through to a nation anesthetized by Obama and suffused with a handout mentality just isn´t realistic.
Since 11/6 the GOP has been faced with two choices: 1. accept that taxes on some upper income levels were going to increase and fight to keep those increases to a minimum, or 2). hold out for a principle that maybe 20% of the electorate understands and end up with tax increases for everyone along with sequestration - and be deep fried by the Democrat/MSM cabal for allowing it to happen.
Good luck going into 2014 with the latter being hung around our necks.
JPod and poster #3 are right - there is no magic man or silver bullet technique which could have denied Obama & the Dems some level of tax increase. The election results ensured that.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Blue-Z-Anna, 1/4/2013 8:14:47 AM (No. 9097886)
I don´t expect Boner to control policy.
I expect him to get loud and proud about the merits of a sound fiscal policy.
Many ´moderates´ can be won over but not by this three hanky wuss.
Act up !
Make trouble !
Be heard and understood.
Be a leader.
Do what an ´opposition party´ does.
That´s what I want.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
bpl40, 1/4/2013 8:33:00 AM (No. 9097928)
What Messrs. Boehner and McConnell did is not the issue. Podhoretz´a point that there was little choice after the election, is not as worthy of scorn as some posters have positioned. Why they might have done it is the key. If this action was taken (i.e. ´rolling over´ and giving the ´Rats what they wanted) out of fear that they and the MSM will successfully blame and the Republicans, who will then lose their jobs, then it is indeed despicable. Because when the debt ceiling comes up Zippy will threaten to stop the Social Security checks and the terror of being blamed will once more make the Republicans fold. This has been a calculated strategy of the Left since they lost to Richard Nixon in a forty nine state landslide. However, if this was done in deliberate calculation of two points, One, the Republicans were getting most of what they have wanted. While controlling only a third of the government that is not a bad outcome and Two, it will get tax rates off the table and they will successfully be able to force 0bama to talk about cutting ´expenses´ - which really is a euphemism for free entitlements. Time will tell.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Susannah, 1/4/2013 8:39:29 AM (No. 9097943)
Please read the article posted above: "Note to Conservatives: It´s the Media, Stupid."
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Judith, 1/4/2013 8:48:02 AM (No. 9097967)
Look. The leading republicans, after this last election, announced they would be following the dems game plan and agendas. They believed that, according to the dems win and the polls, that the republican party needs to be more like the dems in order to succeed. THEY TOLD US WHAT THEY WERE GOING TO DO, AND NOW THEY HAVE STARTED DOING IT. They (republicans)also claim they will be getting on board the dem´s trains regarding immigration and gun control. They told us, they have acted as dems and are planning on continuing down this road. What are the "conservative" voters going to do about that?
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
chumley, 1/4/2013 8:59:35 AM (No. 9097992)
There are some really great comments on this thread. For my two cents I will reiterate an analogy I made during the primaries, with some modifications. Obama and his cronies broke into my house with the intention of raping my wife and daughter. The rinos, the only cops around, told him they would not accept that; they are only allowed to rape my daughter. Thanks guys. My confidence in you is boundless.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
TasmanJulep, 1/4/2013 9:26:56 AM (No. 9098074)
I stand with #8 and #10. This is the attitude--the philosophy--that must inform our strategy for keeping our great country strong. Kudos to you, #8. I am a Radical. To conservatives shifting uncomfortably, I say: Deal with it.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
nonsense, 1/4/2013 9:59:48 AM (No. 9098134)
For my two cents, I have never seen John Boehner or Mitch McConnell as "Conservatives", they have always impressed me as Republicans leaning in the Democrat-lite direction. Perhaps they are filling the void for the now extinct Blue Democrats.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
JimJr, 1/4/2013 10:26:24 AM (No. 9098195)
#3, You (and the Speaker himself, for that matter) have forgotten that that 1/2 of the 1/3 CONTROLS ALL THE MONEY.
No taxes cannot be raised nor any funds expended with out the approval of the Republican majority in the House.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
stablemoney, 1/4/2013 10:48:01 AM (No. 9098262)
I don´t really care about all the analysis and ponderings of Podhoretz about conservatives. Just cut the spending. That´s it. Nothing else.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
yuban, 1/4/2013 10:48:30 AM (No. 9098263)
Just another hit piece on Conservatives. yawn. All this does is bring out the Moderates from behind Boehner´s skirt to post on L.COM blaming Conservatives for all the ills of the Moderate led GOP. Conservatives within the GOP have NO power and yet when the Moderates fail, Conservatives get the blame.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
TexasHillCountry, 1/4/2013 11:13:17 AM (No. 9098329)
Perhaps a better, prior, question is: What possessed Republicans to pass the legislation that made the "fiscal cliff" possible? I.e., the package of "sequestrations", tax increases, etc. that set pu this whole mess.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
kahunavol, 1/4/2013 1:03:04 PM (No. 9098523)
#22 - post of the day.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
VAfreedomluver, 1/4/2013 2:03:49 PM (No. 9098614)
I think it´s cute that some people still think the Republicans on the Hill want to cut spending, when there´s never been an iota of evidence that they actually do.
There might be a few libertarian-leaning mavericks in Congress who want to cut the beast down to size, but they are few and far between.
We need to stop being played for fools. Podhoretz´s thesis here is not helpful. Slightly slowing down the slide into disaster --his idea of the "conservative" thing to do--is not viable public policy.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"
|
|
Guns Responsible for Global Warming
|
|
American Spectator, by Jed Babbin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/8/2013 6:14:16 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Frustration is taking its toll in the liberals’ war against guns. President Obama, pushing his broad gun control agenda, said we should be ashamed if we’ve forgotten the Newtown shooting so soon. The New York Times opined that Obama is being shouted down by the “gun lobby,” even though he and Biden had been crisscrossing the country “…making a forceful case for a package of laws that would reduce gun violence.” That, of course, is the media narrative on gun control. For every issue there is a narrative: a set of assumptions and boundaries of thought
|
Complex Napoleon Rivalry Heads for Its Waterloo
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by Max Colchester
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/8/2013 5:52:11 AM
Post Reply
|
|
GOLFE-JUAN, France—Frank Samson has prepared for a long time to meet his Waterloo. The French lawyer impersonates Napoleon Bonaparte at re-enactment battles, but it is no idle hobby. Mr. Samson has found what he says are perfect replicas of the French general´s gray overcoat, he has studied Napoleon´s native Corsican tongue and he has had himself crowned emperor of France, in a cathedral yet. In 2015, he wants to lead thousands of military enthusiasts into the ultimate re-enactment: the 200th anniversary of the battle of Waterloo in Belgium. But an American rival stands in his way. Mark Schneider, an actor in Virginia
|
|
Repeal, Replace, Still
|
|
National Review Online, by Ramesh Ponnuru & Yuval Levin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/8/2013 5:42:18 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Is it time to give up the fight against Obamacare? That’s a question some conservative health-care experts, pundits, and — more quietly — politicians are asking. In the first years after its passage, opponents had hoped that the Supreme Court would strike down the law or that a new president would sign its repeal before most of it took effect. But the Supreme Court decided to modify a few of its provisions instead of striking it down, and President Obama was reelected. Repeal is almost certainly off the table for four years. Obamacare will continue to be implemented.
|
Division among Republicans on Gang of Eight?
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Byron York
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/8/2013 5:37:13 AM
Post Reply
|
|
As the bipartisan Gang of Eight works to complete a comprehensive immigration reform bill, there has been a growing consensus among Senate Republicans that the bill — so far seen by no one outside the Gang — should be the subject of multiple hearings and extended consideration inside the Senate Judiciary Committee. But on Sunday there were signs that consensus does not extend to the Republicans inside the Gang. Appearing on CBS, longtime immigration reform advocate and Gang member Sen. John McCain suggested the immigration issue is so familiar to lawmakers that multiple hearings will not be necessary.
|
Liars! Illegal Immigration Surging While Obama Administration Claims it is Declining
|
|
Gateway Pundit, by Mike LaRoche
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/8/2013 5:25:44 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Via Fox Nation, newly released statistics show that illegal immigrant infiltration along the U.S.-Mexico border is increasing markedly despite recent statements to the contrary by Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano: “I can tell you having worked that border for 20 years, it is more secure now than it has ever been. Illegal apprehensions are at 40-year lows,” Napolitano told reporters this week in Houston. But figures released Thursday by Customs and Border Protection to Fox News tell a different story. Arrests are actually up 13 percent
|
|
Obama´s Dangerous Nuclear Dance
|
|
Daily Beast, by Leslie H. Gelb
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/8/2013 5:11:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The White House press corps should ask President Obama this question: You’ve told Iran’s leaders that if they come close to marrying a nuclear warhead with a missile that can hit the United States or our allies, they should expect a U.S. military attack on their soil. (Snip)Administration officials would never admit it, but the main reason for their being tougher on Iran than North Korea seems tied to American domestic politics as much or more than anything else, specifically the standing of Israel and oil versus Korea and Japan.
|
How Texas Became Texas and Why It Matters
|
|
New York Times, by Bryan Burrough
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/8/2013 5:04:06 AM
Post Reply
|
|
AS a Texas-raised journalist, I can tell you two things with confidence about my native state. One, its economy has been humming nicely for years. Two, this appears to greatly offend a certain breed of Northern writer, several of whom have descended on the state in an attempt to rebut stories of a “Texas miracle.” (Snip) “Texas has a long tradition of looking outside the government for support — and often finding it. That predates the Texas revolution and was reinforced by the rise of the cattle kingdom and the oil booms.”
|
Left Celebrates the Death of Rick Warren’s Son
|
|
PJ Media, by Rick Moran
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/8/2013 4:55:58 AM
Post Reply
|
|
One of the more disturbing aspects of the internet culture — fed largely by the ability to post anonymously — is the rash of mean, hateful comments made following the death of a prominent figure associated with one side or the other. It’s a disease that afflicts both sides. The death of Ted Kennedy a few years ago brought out the haters on the right to an unprecedented degree. The vitriol and foul language as well as carefully composed comments designed to inflict the maximum amount of pain that were the rule on the right
|
ATF pulls license of one particular gun shop
|
|
Hot Air, by Jazz Shaw
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/8/2013 4:53:04 AM
Post Reply
|
|
It took little more than the headline of this article to begin raising eyebrows Gun shop that sold to mother of Newtown shooter loses license (Reuters) – The U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms said on Friday it had revoked the federal license of a Connecticut gun retailer that sold a weapon to the mother of Adam Lanza, who killed 26 people at an elementary school in December. The agency on December 20 revoked the license of Riverview Gun Sales in East Windsor, Connecticut, ATF spokeswoman Debora Seifert said.
|
Swanky Beach Enclave Seeks Relief From Bird Stench
|
|
Associated Press, by Julie Watson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/8/2013 4:43:43 AM
Post Reply
|
|
La Jolla´s jagged coastline is strictly protected by environmental laws to ensure the San Diego community remains the kind of seaside jewel that has attracted swanky restaurants, top-flight hotels and some of the nation´s rich and famous, including billionaire businessman Irwin Jacobs and former presidential candidate Mitt Romney. Tourists flock to the place. So do birds. Lots of birds. And with those birds comes lots of poop. So rather than gasping in amazement at the beautiful views, some are holding their noses from the stench coming from the droppings that cake coastal rocks and outcroppings near its business district.
|
|
America’s Foes Call Obama’s Bluff
|
|
FrontPage Magazine, by Daniel Greenfield
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/8/2013 4:38:19 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Obama, Kerry and Hagel thought that they had a plan for putting North Korea back in the box. North Korea had conducted a nuclear test in February, violating once again the various understandings that had been worked out. But agreements and understandings, written or oral, had never meant much to the repressive regime which had suspended the Armistice Agreement that ended the Korean War numerous times—including last month. So Obama decided to wave a stick. The playbook for North Korea would feature flights by B-2 and B-52 bombers and F-22 fighter jets to remind
|
How America Lost Its Four Great Generals
|
|
Commentary Magazine, by Max Boot
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 3:01:19 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The quasi-official ideology of the U.S. armed forces holds that generals are virtually interchangeable, that individual personalities don’t matter much, that ordinary grunts are in any case more important than their leaders, and that what really counts are larger systems that make a complex bureaucracy function. There is some truth to all of this. But for all of the bureaucratic heft of the services and the heroism of ordinary soldiers, it is hard to imagine the Civil War having been won without Grant, Sherman, and Sheridan—or World War II without Marshall, Eisenhower, Patton, Bradley, Arnold, LeMay, Nimitz, Halsey,
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
´My bangs are getting a little irritating´: Michelle Obama admits she already regrets her high-maintenance hairdo
|
|
Daily Mail (UK), by Margot Peppers
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: pineledger- 4/7/2013 7:43:42 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Michelle Obama has admitted that she is already tired of the bangs she first sported in January. The First Lady said in an interview with Entertainment Tonight: ´Bangs are a day-by-day proposition. They´re starting to grow out, get a little irritating.´ Still, she hasn´t let her hairdo woes get her down. ´It´s okay,´ she said after her initial complaint. ´We´ll be good.´ The first indication that her hairstyle was becoming a burden came about last weekend, when Malia, 14, was spotted adjusting her mother´s hair during the White House Easter Egg Roll.
|
McCain: ´I don´t understand´ GOP filibuster on guns
|
|
Politico, by Jennifer Epstein
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/7/2013 12:18:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Sen. John McCain says he doesn´t understand the threats from some of his Republican colleagues to filibuster a bill on background checks to buy guns. "I don´t understand it," the Arizona Republican said on Sunday of the threat coming from Sen. Rand Paul,Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen. Mike Lee and nine other Republicans. "The purpose of the United States Senate is to debate and to vote and to let the people know where we stand.” "What are we afraid of? ... If this issue is as important as we all think it is, why not take ... it up and debate?"
|
Christians, here´s why we´re losing our religion
|
|
Fox News, by Craig Groeschel
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: STLstudent- 4/7/2013 5:13:55 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Recent research indicates that the number of people who do not consider themselves a part of an organized religion is steadily on the rise. Interestingly enough, though the number of those religiously unaffiliated is increasing, there is little to no trend in the number of those who express atheist or agnostic beliefs. People aren’t saying they don’t believe in God. They’re saying they don’t believe in religion. They are not rejecting Christ. They are rejecting the church. This begs the question, “Why are we losing our religion?”
|
Broadcasters worry about ´Zero TV´ homes
|
|
Associated Press, by Ryan Nakashima
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Ribicon- 4/7/2013 2:43:40 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Los Angeles — Some people have had it with TV. They´ve had enough of the 100-plus channel universe. They don´t like timing their lives around network show schedules. They´re tired of $100-plus monthly bills. A growing number of them have stopped paying for cable and satellite TV service, and don´t even use an antenna to get free signals over the air. (Snip) Last month, the Nielsen Co. started labeling people in this group "Zero TV" households, because they fall outside the traditional definition of a TV home. There are 5 million of these residences in the U.S., up from
|
Mother Of Slain Benghazi Officer To Sean Hannity: ‘They Want Me To Shut Up’
|
|
Mediaite, by A.J. Delgado
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:00:16 AM
Post Reply
|
|
On Friday, Sean Hannity brought Pat Smith, mother of the late Sean Smith, on his radio program. The 34-year-old information management officer was one of four Americans murdered in the Benghazi embassy attack on September 11, 2012. In the chilling interview, a distraught Ms. Smith, in tears, pleaded for answers and spoke of the efforts to silence her. Ms. Smith first relayed how her son, prior to the attack, requested additional security in advance and warned the State Department: He did tell them, ahead of time, he typed it into his little typewriter over there,
|
Vanishing workforce weighs on growth
|
|
Washington Post, by Jim Tankersley
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:28:59 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Put out an all-points bulletin: Millions of Americans have gone missing from the workforce. Every month that those would-be workers are gone raises the odds that they might never come back, dimming the prospects for future economic growth. The vanishing trend is more than a decade old, but it accelerated during the Great Recession. Throughout 2012, economists held out hope that it had stopped. But then came Friday’s jobs report, and hopes were dashed. The Labor Department reported that the U.S. labor force — everyone who has a job or is looking for one — shrank
|
Obama critic apologizes for his ´poorly chosen words´ on gay marriage
|
|
The Hill [Washington DC], by Alexandra Jaffe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/6/2013 12:18:19 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson, considered by some to be a potential Republican contender for president, apologized to Johns Hopkins University for the "poorly chosen words" he used in expressing his opposition to gay marriage last month.“I am sorry for any embarrassment this has caused,” Carson said in the letter, reported in New York Magazine.(Snip) "Although I do believe marriage is between a man and a woman, there are much less offensive ways to make that point. I hope all will look at a lifetime of service over some poorly chosen words.” Carson will remain as commencement speaker at Johns Hopkins,
|
The Secrets of Princeton
|
|
New York Times, by Ross Douthat
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 8:08:09 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Susan Patton, the Princeton alumna who became famous for her letter urging Ivy League women to use their college years to find a mate, has been denounced as a traitor to feminism, to coeducation, to the university ideal. But really she’s something much more interesting: a traitor to her class. Her betrayal consists of being gauche enough to acknowledge publicly a truth that everyone who’s come up through Ivy League culture knows intuitively —
|
Is going gluten-free healthier for everybody?
|
|
The Week, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: NorthernDog- 4/7/2013 11:28:27 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Gluten-free diets are all the rage, but they can be dangerous if not done right. What is gluten? It´s the spongy complex of proteins, found naturally in wheat, rye, and barley, that gives elasticity to dough and allows it to rise. When flour is moistened and either kneaded or mixed into dough, gluten molecules form an elastic, microscopic latticework that traps the carbon dioxide produced when yeast ferments, causing dough to inflate like a hot air balloon. Baking hardens the gluten, which helps the finished product keep its shape. Wheat — and gluten — is ubiquitous in the American diet.
|
Adam Lanza´s murder spree at Sandy Hook may have been´act of revenge´
|
|
New York Daily News, by Matthew Lysiak and Rich Schapiro
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: noproblems- 4/7/2013 9:52:58 AM
Post Reply
|
Newtown killer Adam Lanza may have launched his murder spree at Sandy Hook Elementary School as an “act of revenge,” the Daily News has learned. A close friend of Lanza’s mother told The News that the troubled boy was a target of relentless bullying when he attended the Connecticut school years ago. “I think Adam felt betrayed by the school and this was his act of revenge,” said Marvin LaFontaine, a friend of Nancy Lanza’s. “Nancy told me he was being picked on at school. That they were just torturing him.” Source and text corrected by Staff.
|
Parents outraged that Mass. kids were denied lunch
|
|
Associated Press, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: beancounter- 4/6/2013 5:21:39 PM
Post Reply
|
|
ATTLEBORO, Mass. — As many as 25 students at a Massachusetts school were denied lunch this week — with at least some forced to dump their food in the garbage — because they couldn´t pay, school officials and parents said. Outraged parents said some students at Coelho Middle School in Attleboro cried when they were told by a worker for the district´s food service provider they could not eat on Tuesday because they couldn´t pay or their pre-paid accounts were short on funds. The on-site director for the company, Whitsons Culinary Group of Islandia, N.Y., was placed on administrative leave by
|
|

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
FS
|
|