A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy

































   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


The Superb Mitt Romney
National Review Online, by Jay Nordlinger

Original Article

Posted By:MissMolly, 1/2/2013 5:14:10 AM

About 20 years ago, I often said, “You can say anything about Clarence Thomas. No matter how vile, false, or even racist, you can say it about Thomas, and get away with it. The culture permits it. It’s open season on Clarence Thomas.” Many years later, I said something similar about Sarah Palin. And I can almost say something similar about Mitt Romney. What I have heard since Election Day is astonishing. Romney has been turned into something he has never been. The Left has been atrocious, because, why wouldn’t it be? It’s my fellow conservatives I’m talking about.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Crosscut, 1/2/2013 6:54:41 AM     (No. 9094184)

Romney very likely may have been America´s last hope to avoid economic and social collapse. And even more frightening perhaps, civil war.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Rakasha, 1/2/2013 7:23:56 AM     (No. 9094224)

I am thoroughly disgusted with the elitism that pervades people´s thinking regarding politics. No, Romney is not ´better than the country´ and Mr. Nordlinger does him a diservice by presenting him as such. I know personally more than a dozen men and women who would make great senators and congressmen and half a dozen that I would seriously consider for the Presidency - not because they are ´better´ than anyone else, but because they are people who understand government.

In fact, I will go so far as this, this nation has more people capable of being a decent President than would ever be able to serve.

By the way, Mr. Nordlinger, none of the consevatives I know were upset or offended by Romeny´s comment about the poor. It was the progressive wing of the party - the ones who are now insisting that if we want to win we have to give stuff away just like the other party - who got their panties in a wad over that.

I do not argue that we would not have been better off had Romney won, however, he obviously couldn´t. Whether that was because the Republican leadership let him down by not preventing vote fraud (their apparent legal inability to prosecute it after the fact is a whole ´nother issue), or whether he failed to present his arguments clearly enough to bring out antipathetic voters, or whether we - as a nation - are simply to far gone down the ´gimmee´ path ( I believe that it was a combination of these factors), superb or not, Romney was unable to win this election.



Perhaps dealing with these rifts is a better way to spend our time and energy, rather than castigating each other.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Malia2012, 1/2/2013 7:57:36 AM     (No. 9094276)

What #1 said...Dear Mr. Nordlinger, Thank you for at least being ONE writer who can see what happened during this past "election". Mitt Romney was not simply running against obama, but the "msm", demonrats, AND a lot of "conservatives" in the GOP. Those facts, along with massive voter-fraud guaranteed a loss that should have been a landslide. He was demonized in ways I´ve not seen in all the years of paying attention to politics in this Country, and it was disgraceful. IMHO, the entire Country, and perhaps the World will pay for the mistake of putting obama back in the W.H.


Reply 4 - Posted by: smcchk, 1/2/2013 8:17:41 AM     (No. 9094307)

#2, you may know a lot of folks who might make good Presidents but are they running,,for anything? If not, then comparing them to Gov. Romney is just fantasy, like making a Fantasy Football team. I know the beauty of this site is that we all get to be Monday morning quarterbacks but let´s remember how easy it is to talk and how hard it is to do. Gov. Romney gave his best for this country and for that, I admire him and will miss what he could have done forever.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Foggybottom, 1/2/2013 8:36:57 AM     (No. 9094339)

Woulda, coulda, shoulda.


Reply 6 - Posted by: kahunavol, 1/2/2013 8:44:41 AM     (No. 9094355)

If you fail to make your case over a four year period, the failure is yours. Before his reliable defenders come out, I voted for him as did every member of my family through three generations who is eligible to vote.


Reply 7 - Posted by: Rakasha, 1/2/2013 9:06:16 AM     (No. 9094403)

You miss my point #4. I´m not saying that they could - or would - run for the Presidency. I am saying that the qualities that would make them a good President do not include that they are somehow superior to the rest of us.

I think that is a dangerous road that many in the Republican party have found themselves walking down. It is what leads to ´legacy´ seats in the House and Senate and the quashing of very good candidates - on every level - because they don´t have the right background or somehow haven´t ´paid their dues´.

Trying to select the best candidate does not mean they are our ´betters´.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Susannah, 1/2/2013 9:11:53 AM     (No. 9094416)

I think Romney made his case quite well. It was certainly clear to me. But when the entire press cops is against you, the message doesn´t get out.


Reply 9 - Posted by: EnsignO´Toole, 1/2/2013 9:22:03 AM     (No. 9094446)

Thank you Mr. Nordlinger for articulating what has needed to be said. Also thanks to #3, I echo your thoughts.


Reply 10 - Posted by: plumnellie, 1/2/2013 9:22:43 AM     (No. 9094449)

#8 I agree the media blocked anything positive about Romney´s message. But, he had a weak team. And, if the team is a reflection of the top man then Romney is shown to be clueless too. With all the information about media bias clearly available to Republicans, they still act as if the playing field is even. Why not spend money on savvy media people to crack the iron curtain of bias. We have many ways to get out the message now that youtube and other means are in place. But, our ´leaders´ remain stagnant and old fashioned. White male country club...call them what you will but Repub leaders are not able to lead because they are not in tune with communication techniques. I keep hoping one Repub will understand that pretending the press/media is impartial is stupid. Go after the media. Hammer it every day.


Reply 11 - Posted by: Susannah, 1/2/2013 9:44:45 AM     (No. 9094503)

In Post #8, I meant to write "press corps" rather than "press cops." But perhaps in this case it´s a distinction without a difference. What I really should have written was "press corpse."

The press has been overwhelmingly liberal since the Kennedy administration, or the newspaper strike that killed so many conservative broadsheets. Reagan won by a landslide despite the constant portrayals of him as a dunce and a tool of the rich. It´s the demographic that´s changed.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Cleanhousein2012, 1/2/2013 9:52:41 AM     (No. 9094518)

Romney may or may not have been a good or e en great President. He was, however, a lousy candidate. At the beginning of the primary cycle, as Romney´s team (and many LDotters I might add) castigated anyone who didn´t follow the Mr. electable meme, there were many of us that said what the left´s strategy would be to kneecap Mr. Romney, and they did Iir in lights.

Lousy candidates don´t win elections.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: IdahoSky, 1/2/2013 9:58:05 AM     (No. 9094526)

Just so, Mr. Nordlinger.
Mitt Romney didn´t let America down but her citizens sure did. Americans have the government they so richly deserve.


Reply 14 - Posted by: pros7767, 1/2/2013 10:10:57 AM     (No. 9094548)

The electorate didn´t let Mitt Romney down. The Republican Party let the electorate down by not challenging this election and the massive amounts of voter fraud.

Mitt Romney was a good, decent, honest man who could have saved this country. Unfortunately, he failed to go after Obama with the same tenacity that he went after the other Republicans in the primary. He lost the election in the second and third debates, and his failure to challenge voter counts.

Pity for our country.


Reply 15 - Posted by: tisHimself, 1/2/2013 10:46:46 AM     (No. 9094616)

Those of you still clinging to the belief that Romney was a magnificent choice and candidate, oh, yeah, and that conservatives somehow stabbed him in the back, then open up your checkbooks and start writing it out to Romney2016.

You tried to sell something no one ever was going to buy and now you are stuck with a warehouse full of it. Sell it someplace else.


Reply 16 - Posted by: StormCnter, 1/2/2013 3:09:23 PM     (No. 9095091)

I dunno. It seems to me that there are still at least a few "clinging" to bitterness and vitriol about our 2012 nominee. I´ve supported a lot of candidates who were not my first choice over the years. Sometimes, it´s just a little more graceful to put a stopper in the it, my friend.


Reply 17 - Posted by: King of all trolls, 1/2/2013 3:28:30 PM     (No. 9095124)

Romney, 2016!
Nixon lost the first round too.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Wetlandz, 1/19/2013 1:16:15 PM     (No. 9126625)

The ABRs put no one Forward, so you have no reason to complain but I at least think you turned out unlike the Paulites who put forth a waste your vote candidate.

Romney was a breath of fresh air, experience and not a natural politician, he would´ve made a tremendous leader. Those rape comments of Aiken and Mourdock didn´t help.

Voting fraud definitely. Obama also charged up the low info gimme crowd with his kill Romney. I only hope that what goes around comes around with him and the media alike. Maybe one day we will find out those voting machines were tampered with like I´m convinced they were.



Post Reply   Close thread 717387




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "MissMolly"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "MissMolly"



Fashion designer Lilly Pulitzer dies at 81
Associated Press, by Jennifer Kay    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/7/2013 4:46:58 PM     Post Reply
MIAMI -- Lilly Pulitzer hosted parties in her bare feet and wasn´t afraid to get a little messy - just as long as she looked good and had fun, too. In the late 1950s, the Palm Beach socialite had time to spare and a wealthy husband who owned citrus groves, so she opened an orange juice stand just off the island´s main shopping street. Pulitzer needed to hide all the juice stains on her clothes,though. Instead of just putting on an apron, she asked her seamstress to make some sleeveless dresses

Still OK to withdraw welfare benefits
at ATMs in Colorado strip clubs
Daily Caller, by Greg Campbell    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/7/2013 5:49:05 AM     Post Reply
An attempt by Colorado lawmakers to ban welfare recipients from withdrawing their benefits at ATMs located inside strip clubs was killed by Democrats Thursday night, even though the state House’s third-ranking Democratic legislator supported the measure. Democratic Rep. Dan Pabon lent his support to the Republican-led proposal, offered as an amendment during a debate on the state budget Thursday night, because it would hew to a similar federal rule, according to the Denver Post. Pabon introduced a bill on the issue two years ago, but it didn’t clear the state Senate. State welfare recipients receive their benefits

Cruel founding fathers
Boston Herald, by Howie Carr    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/7/2013 5:31:24 AM     Post Reply
Add the name of Michelle Lynne (ne Robert) Kosilek to the list of modern phenomena the Founding Fathers would definitely not appreciate being blamed for. Little did they know what havoc they would someday wreak by adding the Eighth Amendment to the Constitution to prohibit “cruel and unusual punishment.” Now comes Kosilek, a convicted wife murderer doing life without parole. He/she is claiming that it would be cruel and unusual punishment to deny him/her a sex-change operation — excuse me, “gender-reassignment surgery.”Not to get too graphic, but Kosilek is begging for elective amputation of a body part.

   

 



 
Can We Get Hillary
Without the Foolery?
New York Times, by Maureen Dowd    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/7/2013 5:14:24 AM     Post Reply
PLEASE don’t ask me this anymore. It’s such a silly question. Of course Hillary is running. I’ve never met a man who was told he could be president who didn’t want to be president. So naturally, a woman who’s told she can be the first commandress in chief wants to be. “Running for president is like sex,” James Carville told me. “No one ever did it once and forgot about it.” Joe Biden wants the job. He’s human (very). But he’s a realist. He knows the Democratic Party has a messianic urge to finish what it started

Doom and gloom
New York Post, by John Crudele    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/6/2013 3:50:23 PM     Post Reply
Two very bad and extremely dangerous economic developments happened yesterday — and Wall Street appeared to miss both of them. The Dow Jones industrial average fell 40.86 points to 14565.25 after the Labor Department announced that the seasonally adjusted number of new jobs created in March was just 88,000 — far below the 190,000 or so Wall Street expected. The March figure was also less than one-third the number of jobs created during February. This led to the misperception that the job market tanked in March. It didn’t.

Duck Dynasty Must
Make Liberals Crazy
American Spectator, by Benjamin Brophy    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/5/2013 6:06:07 AM     Post Reply
Duck Dynasty must make liberals heads explode. It is now the most popular “non-scripted” show currently on television. Its Season 3 premiere had 8.6 million viewers and a massive 4.0 rating in the 18-49 demographic, which as you might know, is quite popular with the advertisers. At the same time, each episode ends with the entire family at the dinner table where they pray before eating. Indeed, the Robertson clan is entirely evangelical. They take their faith in Christ seriously and exert quite a bit of effort preaching the gospel. The patriarch of the family, Phil, used to live

Obama´s Harris ´compliment´ backfires
Politico, by Jonathan Allen    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/5/2013 5:56:52 AM     Post Reply
Ohio’s Mike DeWine, Alabama’s Luther Strange and Georgia’s Sam Olens, eat your hearts out: President Barack Obama thinks California’s Kamala Harris is the belle of the ball among the nation’s top government lawyers. “She’s brilliant and she’s dedicated, she’s tough … She also happens to be, by far, the best looking attorney general,” Obama said at a Democratic National Committee luncheon in Atherton, Calif., Thursday. “It’s true! C’mon.” Obama’s remark set the chattering class atwitter. Certainly, Obama meant no insult, but in singling out Harris for her looks, Obama joins a long list of public figures

Peace processing again —
this time from Kerry
Washington Post, by Jennifer Rubin    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/5/2013 5:40:13 AM     Post Reply
It must be something in the water at the State Department — every secretary sooner or later develops an insatiable yearning to be the guy or gal who finally unlocked the secret to Middle East peace. Now Kerry has the peace process bug. The State Department spokeswoman did her best to lower expectations. (“His diplomacy will be based on what he hears from the parties”), but it was hard to conceal what a fruitless endeavor this is. Indeed, it is downright bizarre that while North Korea is saber-rattling, the Syrian war sends reverberations through the region,

Fee? What fee? : The Met denies
hiding free entry option from visitors
New York Post, by Bill Sanderson    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/5/2013 5:25:59 AM     Post Reply
Art lovers, put away your wallets: In a surprise statement today, the Met said that it’s never tried to paint over rules requiring it to let anyone in for free. Lots of art connoisseurs know that the Metropolitan Museum of Art’s $25 admission charge is just a suggestion, and that you can get in by paying what you want, or nothing at all. But a lawsuit filed in state Supreme Court last November says the Met hides that policy from visitors. And two weeks ago, a former supervisor at the museum told The Post that he’d arranged for security officers

How to Survive a Sex Scandal:
Mark Sanford Edition
Daily Beast, by David Freedlander    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/5/2013 5:17:44 AM     Post Reply
How do you survive a sex scandal? Public-relations reps and crisis-communications counselors have made careers of dispensing advice on such matters. And so the usual counsel follows a fairly trite and untested path: Be honest from the start. Apologize. Make sure your wife stands behind you. Hogwash, for the most part. Everyone apologizes, nearly everyone’s wife is supportive, and no one is honest from the start. But still some politicians survive sordid situations, and some do not. Why? Let’s allow history to be our guide. There are more than enough examples to choose from. It was only Tuesday that former South Carolina governor

The Borking of Michele Bachmann
American Spectator, by Jeffrey Lord    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/4/2013 5:17:59 PM     Post Reply
Shocker. Having failed to end Congresswoman Michele Bachmann’s congressional career at the polls, the left is now moving to do it the old-fashioned way: Bork Bachmann unto political death. The problem? This really is the old-fashioned way. And any conservative even semi-awake recognizes the game instantly. In this case the game being played with the so-called Office of Congressional Ethics, the OCE. This is what we now call “Borking.” The method of choice of liberals when they are frustrated by the public’s attachment or potential attachment to a political figure on the Right.

King Barack: “I Am Constrained
By A System That Our Founders
Put In Place” (Video)
Gateway Pundit, by Jim Hoft    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/4/2013 3:50:03 PM     Post Reply
Barack Obama taunted gun owners and complained to supporters yesterday, “I am constrained by a system our founders put in place.” CBS Local reported: Ratcheting up pressure for Congress to limit access to guns, President Barack Obama said Wednesday that recent steps by Colorado to tighten its gun laws show “there doesn’t have to be a conflict” between keeping citizens safe and protecting Second Amendment rights to gun ownership. “I believe there doesn’t have to be a conflict in reconciling these realities,” Obama said in Denver, where he stepped up his call for background checks



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



´My bangs are getting
a little irritating´: Michelle
Obama admits she already regrets
her high-maintenance hairdo

63 replie(s)
Daily Mail (UK), by Margot Peppers    Original Article
Posted By: pineledger- 4/7/2013 7:43:42 AM     Post Reply
Michelle Obama has admitted that she is already tired of the bangs she first sported in January. The First Lady said in an interview with Entertainment Tonight: ´Bangs are a day-by-day proposition. They´re starting to grow out, get a little irritating.´ Still, she hasn´t let her hairdo woes get her down. ´It´s okay,´ she said after her initial complaint. ´We´ll be good.´ The first indication that her hairstyle was becoming a burden came about last weekend, when Malia, 14, was spotted adjusting her mother´s hair during the White House Easter Egg Roll.

Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney
General´ Comment Was a Gaffe

62 replie(s)
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM     Post Reply
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that

We are living in a dying country (Thread 2)
59 replie(s)
Rushlimbaugh.com, by Rush Limbaugh    Original Article
Posted By: LComStaff- 4/7/2013 6:49:54 AM     Post Reply
This is the second thread of an article posted yesterday which can be found here:http://lucianne.com/thread/?artnum=730032

McCain: ´I don´t understand´
GOP filibuster on guns

52 replie(s)
Politico, by Jennifer Epstein    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/7/2013 12:18:14 PM     Post Reply
Sen. John McCain says he doesn´t understand the threats from some of his Republican colleagues to filibuster a bill on background checks to buy guns. "I don´t understand it," the Arizona Republican said on Sunday of the threat coming from Sen. Rand Paul,Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen. Mike Lee and nine other Republicans. "The purpose of the United States Senate is to debate and to vote and to let the people know where we stand.” "What are we afraid of? ... If this issue is as important as we all think it is, why not take ... it up and debate?"

Hillary Clinton Would Not
´Clear the Field´ for 2016

41 replie(s)
New Republic, by Tod Lindberg    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/6/2013 5:22:36 AM     Post Reply
No one is more preoccupied these days with Hillary Clinton´s 2016 plans than the Beltway political class—not even the former presidential candidate herself. To hear some tell it, her decision will be dispositive for all other Democrats thinking of entering the race. And pundits and reporters aren´t the only ones positing the "The Hillary Factor": No less than the House Democratic whip, Steny Hoyer, told BuzzFeed, “I don´t know that anybody would run against Hillary…. If she runs, she clears the field.” It´s an understandable conclusion, given Clinton´s stature in the Democratic Party and her 70 percent

Obama critic apologizes for
his ´poorly chosen words´
on gay marriage

41 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington DC], by Alexandra Jaffe    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/6/2013 12:18:19 PM     Post Reply
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson, considered by some to be a potential Republican contender for president, apologized to Johns Hopkins University for the "poorly chosen words" he used in expressing his opposition to gay marriage last month.“I am sorry for any embarrassment this has caused,” Carson said in the letter, reported in New York Magazine.(Snip) "Although I do believe marriage is between a man and a woman, there are much less offensive ways to make that point. I hope all will look at a lifetime of service over some poorly chosen words.” Carson will remain as commencement speaker at Johns Hopkins,

Mother Of Slain Benghazi
Officer To Sean Hannity:
‘They Want Me To Shut Up’

38 replie(s)
Mediaite, by A.J. Delgado    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:00:16 AM     Post Reply
On Friday, Sean Hannity brought Pat Smith, mother of the late Sean Smith, on his radio program. The 34-year-old information management officer was one of four Americans murdered in the Benghazi embassy attack on September 11, 2012. In the chilling interview, a distraught Ms. Smith, in tears, pleaded for answers and spoke of the efforts to silence her. Ms. Smith first relayed how her son, prior to the attack, requested additional security in advance and warned the State Department: He did tell them, ahead of time, he typed it into his little typewriter over there,

Vanishing workforce
weighs on growth

37 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Jim Tankersley    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:28:59 PM     Post Reply
Put out an all-points bulletin: Millions of Americans have gone missing from the workforce. Every month that those would-be workers are gone raises the odds that they might never come back, dimming the prospects for future economic growth. The vanishing trend is more than a decade old, but it accelerated during the Great Recession. Throughout 2012, economists held out hope that it had stopped. But then came Friday’s jobs report, and hopes were dashed. The Labor Department reported that the U.S. labor force — everyone who has a job or is looking for one — shrank

White House Blames Jobs
Numbers on Sequester

36 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Wynton Hall    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/5/2013 8:02:58 PM     Post Reply
The Obama White House is scrambling to blame Friday’s abysmal March jobs numbers on the sequester’s trimming of the rate of growth in federal budgets that have yet to fully commence. After the Labor Department announced that a mass exodus of 663,000 workers left the U.S. workforce last month and that job creation fell 112,000 jobs short of projections, Obama’s top economic adviser Alan B. Krueger, took to the White House blog to blame the sequester: It is important to bear in mind that the March household and payroll surveys are the first monthly surveys to look

The Secrets of Princeton
34 replie(s)
New York Times, by Ross Douthat    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 8:08:09 AM     Post Reply
Susan Patton, the Princeton alumna who became famous for her letter urging Ivy League women to use their college years to find a mate, has been denounced as a traitor to feminism, to coeducation, to the university ideal. But really she’s something much more interesting: a traitor to her class. Her betrayal consists of being gauche enough to acknowledge publicly a truth that everyone who’s come up through Ivy League culture knows intuitively —

Beyonce, Jay-Z celebrate 5th
anniversary in Havana, Cuba

32 replie(s)
Los Angeles Times, by Nardine Saad    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 4/6/2013 8:20:04 AM     Post Reply
Beyonce and Jay-Z celebrated their fifth wedding anniversary in Cuba this week. The couple, who married on April 4, 2008, took in the sights of Old Havana, visited a school, dined on a rooftop terrace and strolled the fan-filled streets in their island best.(snip).The power couple declined to answer journalists´ questions about their visit to the island nation, but some outlets are reporting that the moguls are there as tourists, though that would be illegal because of the half-century embargo the U.S. has on the Communist country. However, the Miami Herald said Washington has issued special licenses for

Obama Budget to Cap Retirement
Accounts at $3 Million

30 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Tony Lee    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/5/2013 9:40:39 PM     Post Reply
The budget President Barack Obama will submit on April 10 will contain a proposal that would prohibit individuals from accumulating more than $3 million in Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) and tax-preferred retirement accounts. According to a White House statement, the Obama administration believes the current rules allow some wealthy individuals "to accumulate many millions of dollars in these accounts, substantially more than is needed to fund reasonable levels of retirement saving." "The budget would limit an individual’s total balance across tax-preferred accounts to an amount sufficient to finance an annuity of not more than $205,000 per

   

Post Reply   Close thread 717387





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS