A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC


   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


The Seventh Circuit Blocks the HHS
Mandate for a Private Business

National Review Online, by David French

Original Article

Posted By:Pluperfect, 12/30/2012 5:26:00 AM

Late yesterday afternoon, the Seventh Circuit granted an emergency injunction against the HHS mandate — preventing its enforcement against an Illinois business and its owners. My colleagues at the ACLJ represent Korte & Luitjohan Contractors, Inc., a family-owned, full-service construction contractor. The company is located in Highland, Ill., and employs about 90 workers. The brief opinion is worth a read in its entirety, but two parts stand out. First, the court disagreed with the Tenth Circuit’s recent decision rejecting Hobby Lobby’s request for a similar injunction. In a key paragraph the court stated:

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Chuzzles, 12/30/2012 6:26:30 AM     (No. 9089570)

We get any more judges with commonsense and I may have to revise my opinion about the courts in this country. They may do the right thing yet.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 2 - Posted by: Judith, 12/30/2012 7:27:30 AM     (No. 9089620)

#1 This will eventually work its way up to a supreme court led by roberts and dominated by left-leaning judges and women judges who think with their lady parts....not a good thing.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: seamusm, 12/30/2012 7:31:38 AM     (No. 9089629)

But can we trust Roberts?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 4 - Posted by: Rinktum, 12/30/2012 7:34:58 AM     (No. 9089633)

We wouldn´t be here today if Chief Justice John Roberts would have been less concerned with the court´s legacy and more concerned about the unconstitutionality of this massive Frankensteinian piece of junk legislation. Ironically, "his Court" is going to have one humdinger of a legacy.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 5 - Posted by: JAN, 12/30/2012 7:40:12 AM     (No. 9089641)

President GW Bush made noises about breaking up the 7th. Circuit and they began to behave themselves for a while.

We need to start looking at some of these circuit courts with a serious eye.

The 7th. is certainly a welcome change from the usual suspects who trample our rights.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 6 - Posted by: M2, 12/30/2012 7:44:38 AM     (No. 9089653)

The ACLJ´s outstanding win record deserves note. It is one of the few national groups our family supports with our dollars. They deserve yours, too.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 7 - Posted by: stablemoney, 12/30/2012 7:47:21 AM     (No. 9089657)

Government and lawyer hell. Now business must spend their resources litigating against condoms and birth control issues.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Sfacheem, 12/30/2012 7:57:00 AM     (No. 9089675)

Well, it looks like we have a court that did not want to get upstaged by the French.

Good for us.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 9 - Posted by: geekrunner, 12/30/2012 7:59:23 AM     (No. 9089680)

I think #5 is referring to the 9th Circuit (in California), not the 7th (in Chicago)

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 10 - Posted by: Spidey, 12/30/2012 8:18:25 AM     (No. 9089701)

I seem to remember a judge in La. overturning Obama´s ban on drilling after the Gulf spill and of course he completely ignored it. We also won initial lower court cases in Obamacare that went in one ear and out the other. This ruling is good news but all it does is set up another SC battle of religious liberty being threatened by Obamacare.

I think Roberts will rule on our side this time because he bought himself some political capital on the first case.I think Obama should have been impeached for his public posturing while the case was under review but that´s neither here or there now.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 11 - Posted by: Bad Dog, 12/30/2012 8:21:10 AM     (No. 9089703)

Agreed, #9.... you beat me to that corrective point. It was the 9th.

I have friends who work for Korte´s Las Vegas office - my own company subcontracted with theirs frequently on low-rise builds. Back in the good ol´ days, when construction was booming here in Vegas and hubby and I HAD a company - you know, before the Obama Devastation Era began.

Good on Korte for hiring the ACLJ (love the Sekulows!) and good on ACLJ for pursuing this case ... obviously they made wise and convincing arguments!

Pray that this ruling withstands the onslaught of media and supra-court salvos to come.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 12 - Posted by: WimeTarmerFable, 12/30/2012 8:38:40 AM     (No. 9089728)

One battle won, so many many more to go.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: CEP, 12/30/2012 8:50:09 AM     (No. 9089745)

So one court says this another court says that. Can the Supreme Court ignore this?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 14 - Posted by: VinGoombatz, 12/30/2012 8:58:25 AM     (No. 9089756)

The French ruling got me thinking again about equal protection. Can any of the lawyers posting here point to the early history that allowed different tax rates to be applied to different people? In other words, in defiance of equal protection. In addition to net incomes, could we apply different tax rates based on different hair lengths? Different clothing preferences? Different races?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 15 - Posted by: strike3, 12/30/2012 9:07:20 AM     (No. 9089767)

Ultimately, the people are the law. If we refuse to cooperate with the kenyan dictator on every point that we know is wrong and/or unconstitutional, he doesn´t have the courage or the resources to put all of us in prison. This is our country, not his.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 16 - Posted by: Patchy Groundfog, 12/30/2012 9:12:49 AM     (No. 9089777)

#7 has it. We can celebrate so-called victories but the Rubicon has been crossed and now all medicine is political - and that´s just the way the statists like it.

They MIGHT get your vote if you want a phone or a TV but your vote is virtually GUARANTEED if they can threaten to withhold a transplant or lifesaving drugs.

Individual exemptions are nice but we must never lose sight of the goal - repeal of any sort of socialized medicine.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 17 - Posted by: msjena, 12/30/2012 9:24:36 AM     (No. 9089797)

Very interesting. There is also a dissenting opinion. The Supreme Court will no doubt hear this issue. And I wouldn´t be so sure that Roberts is now a liberal.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: philly_patriot, 12/30/2012 9:24:38 AM     (No. 9089798)

The problem is the Supreme Court and great leader controls that ............... and he ............ will have additional appointments there.

Stevens ´holding on´ and a Roberts ´internal revelation´ will not help us ........ the Constitution and our Nation are doomed.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: Zumkopf, 12/30/2012 9:33:30 AM     (No. 9089819)

Sorry, boys and girls, but elections have consequences. By 2016 the vast majority of federal judges -- something like 85% -- will have been appointed by Clinton or Obama. Conservative Federal Court rulings are going to be as rare as conservative Democrats. It´s nice to have a victory today, but between this and John Roberts´ desire to be loved, any victory for our side is going to be ephemeral.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 20 - Posted by: Rumblehog, 12/30/2012 9:53:29 AM     (No. 9089865)

From the gut, I think Roberts knows he screwed up big time and needs to get back in good stead with the American people.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 21 - Posted by: suziannr, 12/30/2012 9:58:56 AM     (No. 9089878)

the Courts are not the final arbiter of our Constitution...we are. It stands or falls on the backs of we...the People.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 22 - Posted by: chicodon, 12/30/2012 10:15:39 AM     (No. 9089919)

#14
Which goes to show our entire tiered system of taxation should be unconstitutional.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: Udanja99, 12/30/2012 10:15:39 AM     (No. 9089920)

#15, exactly what I´ve been saying since Pelousy locked her doors to write this monstrosity. Worst case scenario is that one gets thrown in jail where one will get "free health care", including sex changes in some states.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 24 - Posted by: Buzzman, 12/30/2012 10:18:53 AM     (No. 9089924)

The Supreme Court is dead to me now. They have abdicated their responsibility to protect the people from unconstitutional laws.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 25 - Posted by: Hobbiest, 12/30/2012 10:30:35 AM     (No. 9089936)

Obamacare is going to suffer the same fate as McCain Feingold. There was great dismay when the court found that constitutional, too. Since then it has suffered death by 1,000 rulings and McCain Feingold didn´t need the support of the governors to work the way Obamacare does.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 26 - Posted by: oh-heck, 12/30/2012 10:37:14 AM     (No. 9089948)

The Supreme Court must rule on issues as they are brought to them. The religious liberty question was not brought to them because the penalties were not in the immediate future. In the case Sotomayor ruled on, the Appeals court had ruled against an injunction. In this case, the Appeals case properly ruled for the injunction. The Hobby Lobby family has decided to pay the fines until they get their day in court. So the religious liberty question will definitely get to the USSC,

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 27 - Posted by: kono, 12/30/2012 10:53:44 AM     (No. 9089984)

A ray of hope in a world where the light of reason seems to be increasingly overcome by darkness.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 28 - Posted by: RancherJack, 12/30/2012 10:55:36 AM     (No. 9089987)

Sounds good.

Will never stand the test of total evil which is how Washington works.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 29 - Posted by: Ray of Sunshine, 12/30/2012 11:10:24 AM     (No. 9090007)

I must disagree...the USSC, doesn´t HAVE to decide or rule. It´s strictly up to their decreation if they will hear a particular case. But, settling differences between lower court rulings, is a major, traditional function & purpose of their existence.
Pray that religious freedom prevails.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 30 - Posted by: mickturn, 12/30/2012 11:12:43 AM     (No. 9090013)

The underlying issue is that the Constitution does NOT put judges and courts in charge of any of this. The law is clearly unconstitutional and any judge that finds otherwise should be immediately impeached, removed from office and disbarred! Of course this includes Mr. Roberts who obviously found his own way to leave the law it self in place.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 31 - Posted by: chefrandy, 12/30/2012 11:47:06 AM     (No. 9090055)

Congrats to ACLJ and Korte/Luitjohan. The owners and their family members are active in our community and I´m glad they drew a line in the sand and went to bat against this.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 32 - Posted by: planetgeo, 12/30/2012 11:53:19 AM     (No. 9090065)

Unfortunately, there is a fatal flaw in the otherwise brilliant system of checks and balances that our founders created. They didn´t (and couldn´t) foresee that someday (now) the three branches wouldn´t truly be independent of one another. And the judicial branch in particular has been "dependent-ized" beyond repair.

The Supreme Court appointees now are clearly political apparatchiks rather than skilled and fiercely independent legal experts. The only thing that shocks me about Sotomayor, for example, is that she doesn´t wear a big, pink vagina outfit instead of black robes on the bench. What exactly are her qualifications other than being a liberal activist suckup?

No, our founders never envisioned the court system, and the Supreme Court in particular, as the surrogate dictator robber stamp pad. The entire system of judicial selection must be completely revamped and removed from the clutches of the political party system.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 33 - Posted by: danshanteal, 12/30/2012 12:46:59 PM     (No. 9090134)

Call Sandra Fluke and see what she and the sisterhood think.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 34 - Posted by: bennie, 12/30/2012 12:48:27 PM     (No. 9090137)

Good thing it wasn´t the 9th circus court. It undoubtedly would have gone the other way.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 35 - Posted by: Gallo3, 12/30/2012 1:01:47 PM     (No. 9090154)

Agree with #s 14, 22: the ´progressive´ system of taxation is the major problem, and we need to fight fire with fire: it is ´unfair´.
Taken to its logical conclusion, we should have ´progressive´ gas prices, where if your income is at a certain level you would have to pay more for gas at the pump. or more for a loaf of bread, or higher prices for TV´s etc.

It must be attacked for being ´unfair´, the radical egalitarianists must be hoisted on their own Marxist petard.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 36 - Posted by: Shucky, 12/30/2012 1:14:16 PM     (No. 9090173)

the nation could be invaded, but we can´t compel a conscientious objector to shoot at the enemy in defense of himself, his family and the nation. yet, the democrats would demand that conscientious objectors provide the means to kill innocent babies.

the values of the left are misanthropic.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 37 - Posted by: Timber Queen, 12/30/2012 2:40:35 PM     (No. 9090270)

#15, #23 - Right On!

As for me and my house we will not comply. We will not comply with any local, state or federal regulation that smacks of Agenda 21 marxist redistributionist policies. Government only works with the consent of the governed, and that encompasses more than just casting a vote.

As for jail or prison, might that not be the best place? The socialists are letting out the truly violent, criminal, and the insane. Their end game is to construct a virtual prison by restricting our actions, devaluing our property, and stealing our labor´s just rewards. Why not live in a real prison where they will have to house, feed, and clothe us? Writers can write, artists can paint, readers can read, and the religous can study Scripture, unless of course they do the gulag thingy.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 38 - Posted by: fayebeck, 12/30/2012 2:56:06 PM     (No. 9090297)

#1 and #2. The liberals never quit until the final decision is in their favor.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 39 - Posted by: roger h. cook,MD, 12/30/2012 4:08:26 PM     (No. 9090357)

tHERE MUST BE SOMETHING WRONG ! tHESE LAWYERS HAVE COMMON SENCE.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 40 - Posted by: roger h. cook,MD, 12/30/2012 4:38:17 PM     (No. 9090375)

No. 3 ,the answer is NO!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 41 - Posted by: Ida Lil, 12/30/2012 6:53:33 PM     (No. 9090490)

This thread tells a story that is a shameful
lack of the American independence we are supposed to acquire with birth.
Every cry of woe is us we have lost and must bow to the dictators proves it we who are too sloth and timid to stand up and fight for the Constitution and our continued liberty.
All talk and no action gives the tyrants their most secure impression that they have won without a fight.
Do you want it all saved by someone else -- by their sacrifices? It seems that way.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 42 - Posted by: Babsathome, 12/30/2012 7:22:06 PM     (No. 9090516)

#21, 30 and 41 have laid out my feelings exactly. Time to put the grown up pants on and speak up! Fight for our God given Rights against tyranny.
"Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who did not." ~ Thomas Jefferson

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 43 - Posted by: Coy860, 12/30/2012 7:33:42 PM     (No. 9090524)

I will never forgive Justice Roberts.
I am old, and he signed my death warrant.
No longer can I be assured a death with dignity. The angst is real. Thanks for nothing, Roberts.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment



Post Reply   Close thread 717124




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Pluperfect"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Pluperfect"



100 Years of Wrigley Field: Are the Chicago
Cubs Horrible Because of the Ballpark?
Daily Beast, by Luke Epplin    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 3/28/2014 10:16:19 AM     Post Reply
Happy birthday Wrigley Field, but are you too beautiful of a ballpark? After all, attendance at games is more sensitive to beer prices—much more—than it is to the Cubs’ record. Wrigley Field, the dead-ball-era ballpark wedged into perhaps Chicago’s hippest north-side neighborhood, turns 100 this April. With its ivy-shrouded walls, manually operated scoreboard, and concrete-and-steel edifice, it survives as a monument to architectural beauty and athletic ineptitude. The Chicago Cubs, those loveable losers of the National League, have called the friendly confines of Wrigley home for the past 98 years, and not once in that time have they won the World

One Doctor’s Viral Letter Exposes the Harrowing
Reality of Obamacare’s ‘War Against Doctors’
Independent Journal Review, by Emily Hulsey    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 3/28/2014 5:42:18 AM     Post Reply
In an address to the House on Wednesday, Alabama Representative Mo Brooks read aloud a letter sent to him by Dr. Marlin Gill of Decatur. The letter holds nothing back while detailing the excessive costs and regulations that Dr. Gill calls Obamacare’s “war against doctors.” Here is the full text of the letter, courtesy of Rep. Brooks’ office: Dear Congressman Brooks, As a practicing family physician, I plead for help against what I can best characterize as Washington’s war against doctors. The medical profession has never before remotely approached today’s stress, work hours, wasted costs, decreased efficiency, and declining ability to focus on patient

Lights-out ‘Earth Hour’
is 60 minutes wasted
Washington Times, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 3/28/2014 5:36:47 AM     Post Reply
Few cries for attention are less effective than turning off the lights and sitting in the dark for an hour. Who can watch if they cannot see? Nevertheless, the World Wide Fund for Nature is encouraging people around the world to honor, or celebrate, or mourn, or whatever, during “Earth Hour,” Saturday night between 8:30 and 9:30. The idea is to persuade everybody to renounce technology with the flick of a switch, raising “awareness” of the need for big government to rescue the globe, indeed even the universe, from the scourge of global warming. A surprising number of businesses and

´I know my dad well´,
says Capt Zaharie´s son
New Straits Times [Malaysia], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 3/28/2014 5:18:01 AM     Post Reply
THE youngest son of missing Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 pilot Captain Zaharie Ahmad Shah has finally broke the family´s silence over allegations against his father. Ahmad Seth, 26, a language student, said ever since the aircraft disappeared on March 8, he had been reading up on news reports concerning the flight and his father, as well as the numerous speculation surrounding the incident. He said he was aware of the wild theories that his father, 53, was a political fanatic and that the latter might have hijacked the Boeing jetliner but he was quick to dismiss the speculation, saying that

Tumbleweeds plague drought-
stricken American West
Reuters, by Keith Coffman    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 3/28/2014 5:10:22 AM     Post Reply
Forty-eight hours after a recent windstorm blew a wall of tumbleweeds into his community on the high plains of Colorado, Robert McClintock and his neighbors were still working to clear away heaps of the spiny plant. "It was crazy. Some piles were more than 10 feet high," said McClintock, 38, as he and other residents in the town of Fountain, 15 miles southeast of Colorado Springs, toiled to rake up and bag stacks of the thorny weed in the subdivision. Prolonged drought, punctuated by bursts of high winds and untimely rain, has created an explosion of tumbleweeds on the rolling plains of

Critics warn deportation review could
cut ‘what little is left’ of enforcement
Fox News, by Judson Berger    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 3/28/2014 4:58:16 AM     Post Reply
Critics of the Obama administration´s deportation policies are concerned that an internal review could lead to deeper cuts of "what little is left" of immigration enforcement. The White House announced earlier this month that Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson, at the president´s request, would review enforcement policies. The decision came after Johnson, President Obama and White House officials met with immigrant and Latino advocacy groups, many of whom have slammed the administration for being too tough. One has gone so far as to call Obama the "deporter in chief." But a look at the numbers shows deportations under this administration

The Fourth Quarter
New Yorker, by Ben McGrath    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 3/27/2014 10:52:48 AM     Post Reply
Kobe Bryant and a business associate have a running bet on the staying power of the pop stars Katy Perry and Justin Bieber. Bryant, who wears self-discipline like a badge, has long favored the more predictable Perry’s odds, and found in Bieber’s recent tabloid episodes hints of a looming implosion: talent spurned. As he and the associate walked into the dining room at the Four Seasons, in downtown Miami, in late January, the associate, a Belieber, mentioned that Bryant had been giving him a hard time about it for years. He seemed almost ready to concede. That morning, elsewhere in

Extension of Health Law
Signup Period Worries Insurers
Wall Street Journal, by Louise Radnofsky & Anna Wilde Matthews    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 3/27/2014 10:28:19 AM     Post Reply
The Obama administration´s decision to let some consumers enroll in health plans beyond Monday´s deadline sparked concern among insurers and prompted fresh attacks from opponents of the health law. A surge of consumers is expected to hit HealthCare.gov before Monday´s deadline to sign up for insurance and avoid a penalty under the Affordable Care Act. In the past, heavy traffic has stalled the federal site. On Wednesday, U.S. officials said consumers who say they began trying to sign up for health coverage by Monday´s deadline will be allowed to continue after that date and won´t face penalties for remaining uninsured.

Democrats push for new changes
to ObamaCare amid midterm fears
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 3/27/2014 10:20:07 AM     Post Reply
Several Democratic senators moved Thursday to "improve" parts of ObamaCare, proposing numerous changes to the law amid concerns that it could cost Democrats House seats and possibly the Senate in November. The proposals came from a half-dozen senators, some of whom are facing reelection in the fall and most of whom represent moderate-to-conservative states. Since Democrats currently control the Senate, the proposals will put Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., in an uncomfortable position -- forcing him to decide whether to put the bills to a vote or sideline them, despite the political risks for his party´s incumbents. "There is more to

Untruthful and Untrustworthy Government
National Review Online, by Victor Davis Hanson    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 3/27/2014 5:14:15 AM     Post Reply
Transparency and truth are the fuels that run sophisticated civilizations. Without them, the state grinds to a halt. Lack of trust — not barbarians on the frontier, global warming or cooling, or even epidemics — doomed civilizations of the past, from imperial Rome to the former Soviet Union. The United States can withstand the untruth of a particular presidential administration if the permanent government itself is honest. Dwight Eisenhower lied about the downed U-2 spy plane inside the Soviet Union. Almost nothing Richard Nixon said about Watergate was true. Intelligence reports of vast stockpiles of WMD in Iraq proved as accurate

Erectile Dysfunction and Vegetarianism:
Coming Soon Thanks To Global Warming
Independent Journal Review, by Michael Hausaum    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 3/27/2014 5:11:18 AM     Post Reply
This is not exciting news. The National Institute of Scientific Research in Brussels has identified global warming to be a significant contributor to erectile dysfunction. Dr. Alfvin Schwartz, chief of the study, said: The evidence is clear! All statistics confirm it, but most scientists would not believe it. However, the data is irrefutable. Global warming makes it go numb! There is no other way to say it. In related bad news, the Subcommittee on Food Sustainability and Safety, responsible under the Department of Agriculture and Health and Human Services, is drafting the 2015 U.S. Dietary Guidelines that include concerns for

It’s Not Just Ukraine
Mosaic Magazine, by Michael Doran    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 3/27/2014 4:59:25 AM     Post Reply
Does the Ukraine crisis mark the beginning of a new cold war? The answer from President Obama is a firm no. “The United States does not view Europe as a battleground between East and West, nor do we see the situation in Ukraine as a zero-sum game. That’s the kind of thinking that should have ended with the cold war,” he told a Dutch newspaper. The president is partially correct. Unlike the Soviet Union, Russia has neither the intention nor the capability to challenge the entire European order, and it is certainly not mounting a global revolutionary movement. Nevertheless, it is



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Harry Reid: I don’t recall
accusing Republicans of lying
about ObamaCare horror stories

44 replie(s)
Hot Air, by Allahpundit    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 3/27/2014 3:08:44 PM     Post Reply
Via America Rising and the IJR, is this the key that finally unlocks the enigma of Harry Reid, tinpot demagogue? Maybe, from moment to moment, this guy just … doesn’t realize what’s coming out of his mouth. Hard to believe he could forget saying on the Senate floor that all ObamaCare horror stories — all of them — are a GOP/Koch brothers fairy tale designed to besmirch the stellar reputation of the Affordable Care Act. Those remarks got heavy coverage in conservative media, and even got picked up at WaPo. You don’t toss a grenade that powerful without choosing your

One Doctor’s Viral Letter Exposes the Harrowing
Reality of Obamacare’s ‘War Against Doctors’

40 replie(s)
Independent Journal Review, by Emily Hulsey    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 3/28/2014 5:42:18 AM     Post Reply
In an address to the House on Wednesday, Alabama Representative Mo Brooks read aloud a letter sent to him by Dr. Marlin Gill of Decatur. The letter holds nothing back while detailing the excessive costs and regulations that Dr. Gill calls Obamacare’s “war against doctors.” Here is the full text of the letter, courtesy of Rep. Brooks’ office: Dear Congressman Brooks, As a practicing family physician, I plead for help against what I can best characterize as Washington’s war against doctors. The medical profession has never before remotely approached today’s stress, work hours, wasted costs, decreased efficiency, and declining ability to focus on patient

Obama, Pope Francis
meet for first time

38 replie(s)
CNN, by Halimah Abdullah    Original Article
Posted By: drive- 3/27/2014 9:03:29 AM     Post Reply
U.S. President Barack Obama and Pope Francis met Thursday for the first time at Vatican City, offering a chance for a reset of sorts between the administration and Catholic leadership following years of strained relations. The two world leaders greeted each other with a smile and a handshake, and posed for pictures before sitting down across a table from each other. The goal of the meeting: Focus on areas where two of the world´s most influential men agree and gently tread ground where they differ. The President and the Pontiff will, as the White House said in a statement, focus on "shared commitment

White House looks to regulate cow
flatulence as part of climate agenda

35 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Michael Bastasch    Original Article
Posted By: mitzi- 3/28/2014 3:37:51 PM     Post Reply
As part of its plan to reduce U.S. greenhouse gas emissions, the Obama administration is targeting the dairy industry to reduce methane emissions in their operations. This comes despite falling methane emission levels across the economy since 1990. The White House has proposed cutting methane emissions from the dairy industry by 25 percent by 2020. Although U.S. agriculture only accounts for about 9 percent of the country’s greenhouse gas emissions, according to the Environmental Protection Agency, it makes up a sizeable portion of methane emissions — which is a very potent greenhouse gas. Some of these methane emissions come from

AP poll: Disapproval of
Obama hits 59 percent

32 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington, DC], by Mario Trujillo    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 3/26/2014 7:13:35 PM     Post Reply
Nearly six in 10 people disapprove of President Obama´s job performance in a new poll by the Associated Press, the highest rating recorded by the newswire. According to the AP-GFK survey released Wednesday, 59 percent disapprove of Obama´s job performance while 41 percent approve. A similar poll released by the news outlet in January found 45 percent approved of him while 53 percent disapproved. Other recent polling has found Obama´s disapproval rating slightly lower, remaining in the low 50s. A CBS News poll Tuesday showed 50 percent disapproval, while Gallup has his disapproval at 52 percent. In the AP poll,

The Individual Mandate Goes Poof
27 replie(s)
Wall Street Journal, by Abby McCloskey and Tom Miller    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 3/26/2014 9:11:56 PM     Post Reply
One by one, the myths of the Affordable Care Act have been revealed. When the curtain on open enrollment falls on March 31, the last remaining big myth of ObamaCare will be fully exposed: The individual mandate has failed. After a last-ditch effort with President Obama himself encouraging "young invincibles" to sign up before the deadline, the administration is scrambling to boost enrollment. On Tuesday, the White House announced that people who applied for coverage on the federal health-insurance exchange will have until mid-April to finish the paperwork. The mandate was supposed to be the administration´s magical elixir for the assorted shortcomings

More than 6 million Americans
enrolled under the ACA, WH says

27 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Juliet Eilperin    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 3/27/2014 3:39:18 PM     Post Reply
More than six million Americans have now signed up for private insurance under the Affordable Care Act, according to the White House, with just four days to go until the end of its first open enrollment period. While traveling in Italy on Thursday, President Obama shared the news in a conference call with thousands of health-care navigators and volunteers helping enroll people on state and federal marketplaces. As the volume of consumers seeking health plans has surged -- there were over 1.5 million visits to HealthCare.gov Wednesday and more than 430,000 calls to the marketplaces´ call centers -- Obama urged those on

As Obama meets the pope,
Francis´ smile masks a serious message

27 replie(s)
Los Angeles Times, by Doyle McManus    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 3/27/2014 3:45:00 PM     Post Reply
When Jorge Mario Bergoglio became Pope Francis a little more than a year ago, the first thing that struck those who knew him well was his unexpected, beatific smile. “In Argentina, he didn’t smile like that,” Sergio Rubin, the pope’s biographer, said this week at a conference sponsored by the Ethics and Public Policy Center. “That was the big surprise.” Since then, the pope has mostly kept on smiling — in homilies, in audiences, in meetings with the homeless and the poor. If you look at the pictures from Francis’ meeting with President Obama on Thursday, though, the smile is there only some of the time.

The New Republican Reformers
26 replie(s)
Wall Street Journal, by Karl Rove    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 3/27/2014 7:56:35 AM     Post Reply
Their target is the GOP, but they are not angry liberals bent on destroying it. They are reform-minded Republican leaders intent on strengthening it. These Republicans are applying conservative principles to 21st-century challenges, focused on middle-class concerns like lowering costs and improving access to college, modernizing health care and reforming the tax code. They aim to broaden prosperity´s reach through markets and merit, not government and corporate cronyism. They´re also concentrating on helping the poor by changing Washington´s dizzying assortment of antipoverty programs to emphasize work and make the safety net more effective and sustainable. The reformers´ success in providing

Getting popularity tips? Barack Obama hopes
for ´Francis bounce´ as he meets Pope for
first time and tells him he is a ´great admirer´

26 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by Tara Brady    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 3/27/2014 8:17:00 AM     Post Reply
One is a world leader who has been praised for his humility and outlook on the world. The other is an American president, once the international superstar of the political stage. So it is no surprise that President Barack Obama has travelled to the Vatican in Rome possibly to get some tips from the popular Pope Francis who now even has own weekly glossy magazine dedicated to him. As he sat down with the Pontiff at the Vatican this morning, Obama called himself a ´great admirer´ of the pope. Their historic first meeting comes as Obama´s administration and the church

Watch Chris Hayes Get
Hammered After Personally
Attacking Conservative Guest (Video)

25 replie(s)
Breitbart The Conversation, by Debra Heine    Original Article
Posted By: mitzi- 3/27/2014 4:42:34 PM     Post Reply
Usually the type of Republicans MSNBC hosts invite on their shows are either craven RINO types who can be depended upon to trash talk fellow Republicans, or the more inarticulate, dimmer bulbs in the party who fail to communicate conservative positions effectively. MSNBC host Chris Hayes had an entirely different type of animal on his hands with PA Americans For Prosperity Director, Jennifer Stefano. In fact, he´s probably still licking his wounds after the nasty confrontation he had with her, Wednesday night in a debate over the latest ObamaCare delay. He got off on the wrong foot by introducing Stefano

´Funny´ Feminist: I´d ´Personally Like to
Castrate Every Male Conservative Christian´

23 replie(s)
NewsBusters, by Tim Graham    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 3/27/2014 12:17:28 PM     Post Reply
Joe Newby at The Washington Examiner has found a real doozy of a “comedian.” Her name is Laura Levites – with obviously no connection to the priests of the Old Testament. (She´s an atheist with a fondness for Ricky Gervais.) "I would personally like to castrate every Male Conservative Christian so that they have NO reproductive rights," she wrote on Twitter, using the hashtag "#HobbyLobby." She certainly knows how to draw attention to herself. Newby said that’s not all. She also expressed her hatred of Christians in a tweet calling conservative Christians "******bags," claiming they are "really trying" her patience.


Post Reply   Close thread 717124





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google



© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS