"Then look at the voter fraud. And not a peep from the Republicans. Nothing."

You´d almost think they were on the same side.

I wouldn´t trust Marion Davies´ genitalia about anything...much less national security.

Share and expose this with everyone.

... and the Republican House and John McCain in the NDAA suspended habeas corpus making it possible for Americans to just disappear. The political class in our country are about to devour us.

Me thinks someone is pulling our suspecting strings for effect. Me hopes.

This, along with the second part, was put on Hagmann´s home site first a few days back.

Go to homelandsecurityus.com to read the full thing if it interests you.

Why is it that all these insiders don´t go to someone at Fox or the Washington Times or another legitimate conservative news organization with their information?

Ttn Foil Hat club, I hope. I know several folks who think this way but there is never any hard evidence of their prophesies. Correct me if I´m wrong. Please!

To posit that the gov´t staged Sandy Hook is crazy making crap without supporting evidence.

While the dollar won´t collapse, it is losing value. The famous Big Mac is up 25% over the last 5 years ($3.57 - $4.45 Big Mac Index). I fully expect inflation to increase over the next 4 years.

I must admit, Justice Roberts´ decision to find Obamacare constitutional, was very suspicious. Especially since he condemed it, originally.

What´s the point of going to Fox News with it? Fox hasn´t reported at all about the massive vote fraud perpetrated in the election... the only election in my life (and I remember the Nixon-Kennedy debates) where California wasn´t even mentioned election night. Must have been massive vote fraud there.
This has all been planned for a very long time... KGB creation of Islamic terrorists, destruction and degeneration of American culture, Clinton and Obama doing their best to destroy America. It´s people like Soros and Ayers who should have their homes pinpointed on a map, not American gun owners.

A note for those who still don´t know - the RNC is prohibited by a consent decree from the early 80s from protesting voter fraud. It would have to be contested by someone else. #10 is correct...FNC wouldn´t be interested. Bret Baier might, but he might be overruled.

#7, your question is reasonable, but you should go to the interview text and scroll down to this question: FTA: DH: Eugenics? Population control? and then skim down in the first paragraph to this response: RB: Yup. (snip) And speaking about that, you do know that this crew is using the internet to ruin people, right? They are paying people to infiltrate discussion sites and forums to call people like you idiots. Show me the proof, they say. Why doesn’t you source come forward? If he knows so much, why not go to Fox or the media?

thank you 12. saved me the trouble...

#11 - I´ve heard this on occasion but don´t recall any details. Can anyone enlighten me? Tnx.

#14
http://judicialview.com/Court-Cases/Civil-Procedure/Democratic-National-Committee-v-Republican-National-Committee/10/201975

In 1982, the Republican National Committee (“RNC”) and the Democratic National Committee (“DNC”) entered into a consent decree (the “Decree” or “Consent Decree”), which is national in scope, limiting the RNC’s ability to engage or assist in voter fraud prevention unless the RNC obtains the court’s approval in advance. The RNC appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey denying, in part, the RNC’s Motion to Vacate or Modify the Consent Decree. Although the District Court declined to vacate the Decree, it did make modifications to the Decree. The RNC argues that the District Court abused its discretion by modifying the Decree as it did and by declining to vacate the Decree. For the following reasons, we will affirm the District Court’s judgment.”

While democrats might fantasize about destroying the dollar and commencing with extreme tyranny, the facts are stubborn things. Democrats would need to maintain their own cushy lifestyles while destroying the currency used to transact all their daily requirements. So do they selectively drain the bank accounts of their political opponents and shut down ATMs in selected neighborhoods based on voting patterns? Good luck with that. Do they all shift their holdings to the peso? The premise is far too complex to deploy with any chance of success for an aggressor government. Nan might need to buy another case of scotch (or botox) as her limo goes speeding hither and thither. Democrats would have to ask themselves: do you have absolutely everything now that you will ever need? If any one group decides to blockade or strike, they´re all hosed because they rely on others for absolutely everything from their food to their clothing to their toiletries. Next, DHS has only 200,000 employees according to a GAO report which states DHS employees are 4 percent less satisfied at their jobs than other government employees. This is hardly the base a dictator would start with when attempting to subjugate a population of 310 million Americans, many of whom are well armed, well trained, well supplied, and freedom loving souls. I wouldn´t even trust DHS employees to take over NYC or any single other major city. Furthermore, DHS could not count on the support of at least half of those employees. Many DHS employees started their careers to protect Americans not murder or subjugate them. The half of our population who did not vote for Obama, work in all areas across the spectrum (including food growing, processing, transporting, and service).

- cont - If this story holds any nuggets of truth or leftist wishful thinking, it seems clear that such a ploy is doomed. It is far more likely Janet and Valerie would end up being convicted of treason than anything else. Barack doesn´t have the spine or attention span to go through the years that an all-out war against Americans would require, especially when it is certain democrats would lose absolutely everything. Barack would throw those involved in such an attempt under the bus just like he´s done with so many others. Upon reflection, it seems as likely that "DHS Insider" is intended to demoralize Americans as that it aims to reveal evil intentions.

"new gun law"

Oh, please.
The GOP has the House.
Ain´t gunna be no new gun law to confiscate anything.
If they wanna git reelected, that is.

I´m of the opinion that the Insiders are the new Tokyo Roses of our time determined to demoralize us by constantly telling us we are outnumbered. We´re not.