A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy

































   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


On Leaving Office
National Review Online, by Ramesh Ponnuru

Original Article

Posted By:StormCnter, 12/12/2012 5:27:19 AM

Elliott Abrams criticizes Senator Jim DeMint (R., S.C.), Rep. Jo Ann Emerson (R., Mo.), and other politicians who leave office before their term has expired to take other jobs. It may well be that Ms. Emerson can do a lot of good at the Cooperative Association and that Mr. DeMint will serve the conservative cause well at Heritage. Nevertheless there is something deeply offensive about walking away from the job you so ardently sought from the voters. That act diminishes the significance of elections and indeed of representative democracy,

Comments:
The Abrams piece articulates the criticism well, but is a non-postable site.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Pluperfect, 12/12/2012 6:18:48 AM     (No. 9060927)

I agree with Abrams. Unless serious health issues are involved, there are always lofty sounding justifications for abandoning your office, but it´s always about making more money.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Patchy Groundfog, 12/12/2012 6:52:22 AM     (No. 9060960)

Many Republicans leave office voluntarily but few Democrats do. Draw your own conclusions.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: varkdriver, 12/12/2012 7:37:48 AM     (No. 9060996)

Excellent point, #2; Dimocrats only leave office in a zippered rubber bag [Robert KKK Byrd, Ted ´The Liberal Lyin´ Of The Senate´ Kennedy, etc].


Reply 4 - Posted by: Keekng, 12/12/2012 7:57:47 AM     (No. 9061033)

Would be nice if Bam Bam would walk away.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Judith, 12/12/2012 8:03:19 AM     (No. 9061046)

Listening to the republicans right after the election, especially the leaders, I think DeMint accurately decided there really was no republican party to support. Only a party declaring it would copy whatever the dems did. Which, considering who they chose for the 2008 and 2012 campaigns, they have been doing for a long time.


Reply 6 - Posted by: pickle1, 12/12/2012 8:04:42 AM     (No. 9061050)

I agree. They should never go into the office without fulfilling it.


Reply 7 - Posted by: realrep, 12/12/2012 8:13:59 AM     (No. 9061069)

It shortchanges the supporters and volunteers.


   

 

  


 

Post Reply   Close thread 715293




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"



How Do We Measure Border Security?
National Review Online, by Eliana Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/24/2013 2:30:48 PM     Post Reply
How do we measure the security of our southern border? The answer is more controversial than you might think. The security provisions in the Gang of Eight’s immigration bill, which were intended to serve as a selling point for skeptical GOP lawmakers, require that would-be illegal immigrants are apprehended at a 90 percent rate in certain high-risk border areas, or a commission of federal and border-state officials would be created to take over the making of border-security policy. Determining whether that goal is met requires, for one, an accurate assessment of how many people are actually crossing the border.

When Pundits Grieve
American Spectator, by Matt Purple    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/24/2013 2:25:09 PM     Post Reply
The day after the Boston Marathon bombing, most well-adjusted Americans were feeling a cocktail of emotions: anger at the perpetrators of such a grisly act, sorrow for the dead and their families, hope for the 264 who were injured. Over at Salon.com, the now-infamous David Sirota was wishing that the bombers were white males: [R]egardless of your particular party affiliation, if you care about everything from stopping war to reducing the defense budget to protecting civil liberties to passing immigration reform, you should hope the bomber was a white domestic terrorist.

Globe: Russia warned
FBI “repeatedly” about
Tsarnaev before bombing
Hot Air, by Ed Morrissey    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/24/2013 2:21:43 PM     Post Reply
The FBI briefed the Senate yesterday and today on the progress in the Boston Marathon bombing case, but more questions than answers may have arisen from it. The Boston Globe quotes multiple sources from within the briefing that the FBI didn’t just get one warning from Russia about Tamerlan Tsarnaev, they got warned repeatedly — including after the FBI’s initial investigation of the now-deceased bomber: Russian authorities contacted the US government with concerns about Tamerlan Tsarnaev not once but “multiple’’ times, including an alert it sent after he was first investigated by FBI agents

The Price of Obama’s Islamophilia
American Spectator, by George Neumayr    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/24/2013 6:16:29 AM     Post Reply
The Obama administration tries to leave the public with the impression that its security failures are due to “incomprehensible” forces. But most of them are easy enough to comprehend, as they follow upon repeated and ignored warnings. The father of the jihadist who tried to blow up a plane over Detroit in 2009 went to a CIA office in Africa and announced to anyone who cared to listen that his son was a threat to the U.S. No one did. Major Nidal Hasan, the jihadist who shot up Fort Hood, spared American intelligence even that minor step of dot-connecting.

   

 



 
Bloomberg’s Constitution
New York Sun, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/24/2013 6:12:26 AM     Post Reply
“The people who are worried about privacy have a legitimate worry. But we live in a complex world where you’re going to have to have a level of security greater than you did back in the olden days, if you will. And our laws and our interpretation of the Constitution, I think, have to change.” That is the latest from Mayor Bloomberg in the wake of the Boston Marathon bombing. He is quoted in Politicker.com by the New York Observer’s Jill Colvin, in a dispatch that gives, en passant, a glimpse of the mayor’s inchoate view of the American parchment.

White House had advance warning on
Fisker´s struggles, documents show
Associated Press, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/24/2013 6:04:53 AM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – Newly released documents show that the Obama administration was warned as early as 2010 that electric car maker Fisker Automotive Inc. was not meeting milestones set up for a half-billion dollar government loan, nearly a year before U.S. officials froze the loan after questions were raised about the company´s statements. An Energy Department official said in a June 2010 email that Fisker´s bid to draw on the federal loan may be jeopardized for failure to meet goals established by the Energy Department. Despite that warning, Fisker continued to receive money until June 2011, when the DOE halted further funding.

What Conservatives Are For
National Review Online, by Yuval Levin    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/24/2013 5:43:13 AM     Post Reply
As Republicans continue to think through their (and America’s) path toward renewal, they run a very great risk of focusing on what it is they oppose about the path toward national exhaustion laid out by the Democrats in recent years, and so neglecting to offer the public a clear picture of the Right’s own vision of America. Among the greatest risks is that Republicans, in responding to President Obama’s equation of common efforts with government efforts (an equation that is in fact an assertion of an extremely radical individualism, as it sees all citizens as unconnected to one another

Kermit Gosnell means Democrats
lose their ´war against women´
Washington Examiner, by Noemie Emery    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/24/2013 5:38:11 AM     Post Reply
Remember the "war against women" -- or rather, the war the Democrats claim to be waging against evil Republican social conservatives? It just got a lot harder for the Democrats -- who are Kermit Gosnell´s latest victims -- to win. Gosnell is the Philadelphia abortion provider on trial for nearly two months on multiple murder charges, who has spiked their winning 2012 electoral tactic the way he once "snipped" baby´s spines. In 2012, we saw demure Sandra Fluke being called a "slut" by Rush Limbaugh. In 2013, we see Kirsten Powers, a stunning, blond center-left Democrat, blowing the whistle

Tamerlan Tsarnaev got
Mass. welfare benefits
Boston Herald, by Chris Cassidy    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/24/2013 5:31:11 AM     Post Reply
Marathon bombings mastermind Tamerlan Tsarnaev was living on taxpayer-funded state welfare benefits even as he was delving deep into the world of radical anti-American Islamism, the Herald has learned. State officials confirmed last night that Tsarnaev, slain in a raging gun battle with police last Friday, was receiving benefits along with his wife, Katherine Russell Tsarnaev, and their 3-year-old daughter. The state’s Executive Office of Health and Human Services said those benefits ended in 2012 when the couple stopped meeting income eligibility limits. Russell Tsarnaev’s attorney has claimed Katherine — who had converted to Islam —

   

 

  


 
The Climate Circus Leaves Town
Weekly Standard, by Steven F. Hayward    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/24/2013 5:12:24 AM     Post Reply
If you had told environmentalists on Election Day 2008 that four years later there’d be no successor treaty to the Kyoto Protocol, that a Democratic Congress would not have enacted any meaningful climate legislation, that domestic oil production would be soaring even after a catastrophic offshore oil spill, and that the environmental community would be having a lively internal debate about whether it should support reviving nuclear power, most might have marched into the ocean to drown themselves. Yet that’s the state of play four months into President Obama’s second term.Start with climate change. Early in March,

Mosque that Boston suspects
attended has radical ties
USA Today, by Oren Dorell    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/24/2013 5:00:26 AM     Post Reply
BOSTON — The mosque attended by the two brothers accused in the Boston Marathon double bombing has been associated with other terrorism suspects, has invited radical speakers to a sister mosque in Boston and is affiliated with a Muslim group that critics say nurses grievances that can lead to extremism. Several people who attended the Islamic Society of Boston mosque in Cambridge, Mass., have been investigated for Islamic terrorism, including a conviction of the mosque´s first president, Abdulrahman Alamoudi, in connection with an assassination plot against a Saudi prince.

Dutschke denies any
involvement with ricin-letter plot
Daily-Journal [Tupelo, MS], by Patsy R. Brumfield    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/24/2013 4:56:13 AM     Post Reply
TUPELO – Former Tupelo martial arts instructor J. Everett Dutschke insists he had nothing to do with a ricin-letter plot against President Obama and other officials for which a Corinth man is under investigation. "I categorically deny it," he told the Daily Journal about 4:15 p.m., a few hours after a break in a federal court proceeding to present evidence against Kevin Curtis. "I met the guy on two occasions," Dutschke said in a telephone conversation. "I wasn´t going to be pulled into his fantasy world." He did, however, admit he met with the FBI last Thursday,



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Can a President Who
Has Promised to
´Stand with the Muslims´
Protect Americans?

82 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Lauri B. Regan    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 4/23/2013 3:11:30 AM     Post Reply
In Obama´s Audacity of Hope, he stated, "I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in any ugly direction." He also asserted in Bob Woodward´s Obama´s Wars, "We can absorb [another] terrorist attack." These are two straightforward statements that raise the question of whether a man who has been seemingly obsessed with reaching out to "the Muslim world" since taking office is capable of fulfilling his duty as commander-in-chief to keep America safe and secure.

As Bush library opening puts
his presidency back in the
spotlight, his approval rating is up

60 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Dan Balz    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/23/2013 12:29:52 AM     Post Reply
George W. Bush will return to the spotlight this week for the dedication of his presidential library, an event likely to trigger fresh public debate about his eight fateful years in office. But he reemerges with a better public image than when he left Washington more than four years ago. Since then, Bush has absented himself from both policy disputes and political battles. A new Washington Post-ABC News poll suggests that the passage of time and Bush’s relative invisibility have been beneficial to a chief executive who left office surrounded by controversy.

   

 



 
Republican Benghazi Report
Alleges State Department Coverup

46 replie(s)
Daily Beast, by Eli Lake    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/24/2013 4:50:38 AM     Post Reply
Internal emails in the week following the 9-11 anniversary assault on the U.S. facility in Benghazi show the White House and State Department removed references to al Qaeda and the mention of other recent attacks in Benghazi from widely distributed talking points used to explain the incident to the public, according to a new report from five House Republican committee chairmen released Tuesday afternoon. Citing administration emails provided to the House committees, the 46-page report claims that “to protect the State Department, the Administration deliberately removed references to al-Qaeda-linked groups and previous attacks

Tamerlan Tsarnaev got
Mass. welfare benefits

46 replie(s)
Boston Herald, by Chris Cassidy    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/24/2013 5:31:11 AM     Post Reply
Marathon bombings mastermind Tamerlan Tsarnaev was living on taxpayer-funded state welfare benefits even as he was delving deep into the world of radical anti-American Islamism, the Herald has learned. State officials confirmed last night that Tsarnaev, slain in a raging gun battle with police last Friday, was receiving benefits along with his wife, Katherine Russell Tsarnaev, and their 3-year-old daughter. The state’s Executive Office of Health and Human Services said those benefits ended in 2012 when the couple stopped meeting income eligibility limits. Russell Tsarnaev’s attorney has claimed Katherine — who had converted to Islam —

Flight Delays as Political Strategy
45 replie(s)
Wall Street Journal, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/22/2013 7:59:14 PM     Post Reply
President Obama´s sequester scare strategy has been a political flop, but his government keeps trying. The latest gambit is to force airline flight delays until enough travellers stuck on tarmacs browbeat enough Republicans to raise taxes again. This week the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) began furloughing each of its air-traffic controllers for one day out of every 10 to achieve roughly $600 million in savings this fiscal year. The White House dubiously claims that the furloughs are required by the sequester spending cuts enacted in 2011.

Kerry on Global Warming:
´The Science Is Screaming at
All of Us and Demands Action´

39 replie(s)
Weekly Standard, by Daniel Halper    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/23/2013 5:30:15 AM     Post Reply
In a statement marking Earth Day, Secretary of State John Kerry pledges to deal "responsibly with the clear and present danger of climate change." The former presidential candidate also notes the "fragile planet we share with the rest of humanity and which we must protect for future generations.""The United States joins countries around the world today in commemorating Earth Day. Ever since I was involved in the first Earth Day in Massachusetts, way back in 1970, this has always been a day to reflect on our environmental challenges and our responsibility to safeguard our God-given natural resources

Muslim Congressman On Boston:
"Let´s Not Cast A Wide Net
And Just Go After A Whole
Religious Group"

36 replie(s)
Real Clear Politics, by Ian Schwartz    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/22/2013 6:08:53 PM     Post Reply
REP. KEITH ELLISON (D-MINN.): Well, you know, it is too early for me to second-guess the FBI. I think we need to know more about what they knew. The fact of the matter is that it is good that they contacted him. That wasn´t enough to deter him, obviously. But the fact is that before I’m going to say the FBI should have done something different, what I, I’m not prepared to say that yet. There is just not enough information. What I will say is this: We don´t know what their motivation was yet.

Franken: The Senate needs to
talk more about climate change

36 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington, DC], by Ramsey Cox    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/23/2013 10:26:58 AM     Post Reply
Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) suggested on Earth Day that the Senate should spend more time talking about climate change issues. “I’m here to suggest we talk more about climate change so that we can agree on taking action to address it,” Franken said Monday. “The Senate cannot afford to ignore climate change, we need to talk about it.” Franken pointed out that 98 out of 100 scientist say climate change is real and needs to be dealt with. He said people outside Washington, D.C., understand this. “Many of my other colleagues I suspect don’t talk about

President Obama to daughters:
If you get a tattoo, I’m
getting one too

36 replie(s)
New York Daily News, by Kristen A. Lee    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/24/2013 12:18:38 PM     Post Reply
President Obama and the First Lady have come up with a crafty strategy to prevent their daughters from getting tattoos — and it banks on the girls thinking their parents are deeply uncool. “What we’ve said to the girls is, ‘If you guys ever decide you´re going to get a tattoo, then mommy and me will get the exact same tattoo. In the same place,’” Obama said with a smile. “And we´ll go on YouTube and show it off as a family tattoo.” “And our thinking is that might dissuade them from thinking that that somehow that´s

I´ll Say
35 replie(s)
National Review Online The Corner, by Jonah Goldberg    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 4/23/2013 6:55:51 AM     Post Reply
Apparently the latest craze in NYC is to let your babies’ freak flags fly by letting them go commando: When Jada Shapiro decided to raise her daughter from birth without diapers, for the most part, not everyone was amused. Ms. Shapiro scattered little bowls around the house to catch her daughter’s offerings, and her sister insisted that she use a big, dark marker to mark the bowls so that they could never find their way back to the kitchen. But “elimination communication,” as the diaper-free method of child-rearing is called,

Ben Affleck to live on food
budget of $1.50 per day

35 replie(s)
Star-Ledger [Trenton, NJ], by Janelle Griffith    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 4/23/2013 7:53:21 PM     Post Reply
Academy Award winner Ben Affleck is the latest Hollywood star to lend his celebrity to a social cause. Next week, the "Argo" and "Good Will Hunting" actor will join thousands of others when he lives off of $1.50 per day as part of the Live Below the Line campaign, from April 29 to May 3. Billed as a means to challenge the way people think about poverty, the campaign requires participants to feed themselves on no more than $1.50 a day for five days.

Susan Sarandon: ‘War on
Drugs’ Is ‘Completely Racist’

33 replie(s)
Cybercast News Service, by Melanie Hunter    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/22/2013 9:07:32 PM     Post Reply
Actress Susan Sarandon on Wednesday called the war on drugs “completely racist,” arguing that only lower level drug defendants get locked up – “mostly people of color.” “The war on drugs is ridiculous, because you’re only getting—you’re spending a huge amount of money. It’s completely racist. You’re picking up everybody at the lower level because mandatory minimum drug laws let you trade in to get off, so if you don’t have anyone to trade in, if you’re at the bottom, you’re going to jail," she said. “If you’re up at the top, you just trade in somebody

   

Post Reply   Close thread 715293





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS