 A Message From Lucianne
Now More Than Ever Get Your Eagles Up! Lucianne Tees - in Black or White Click to Buy
|
|
What If Conservatives Have Lost the Argument?
Commentary Magazine, by Peter Wehner
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Dreadnought, 12/10/2012 11:09:03 PM
|
| The debate over the “fiscal cliff” is an important tactical one and could have widespread political ramifications. There are complicated issues to consider. Should the Republicans give in to Mr. Obama’s demand that we raise the top tax rates? If so, what should they demand in return? If they don’t get it, is it more prudent to retreat in order to fight another day on more advantageous ground for the GOP? Or should Republicans be willing to go cliff diving with the president, confident that in the end Obama will own any future recession? Whatever the answer
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
reilly, 12/10/2012 11:15:23 PM (No. 9058757)
Lost the argument to some idiot judges, maybe, but this doesn´t end well. Bank on it.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
dallasdude, 12/10/2012 11:21:58 PM (No. 9058762)
Stand your ground and face the consequences. Do what you say and say what you do.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
oh-heck, 12/10/2012 11:32:15 PM (No. 9058777)
The extensions of unemployment benefits end just before the end of the year. The Bush tax rates end Dec 31. The Payroll Tax Holiday ends Dec 31. All the special credits that give money to those too poor to pay taxes end Dec31. The Sequester begins Jan 1. Just sit at the table and stare back at the President. The laws were bipartisan and signed by the President. Only 10% of the whopping tax bill will be paid by the rich. Don´t go creating new taxes when the Dems have already raised everyone´s taxes.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
johnnygeneric, 12/10/2012 11:52:09 PM (No. 9058791)
By losing we´ve one. Their "utopia" will be their undoing.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Pearson365, 12/11/2012 12:06:14 AM (No. 9058801)
Repubs have to believe in something other than reaching across the aisle. Would suggest:
A. Since existing entitlements are approaching insolvency, demand that Dems rescind that the one entitlement that has not gone into effect, ObamaCare, be rescinded as of 12/31/12. Dems have to decide if SS, Medicare and Medicaid are more important that the ObamaCare montrosity sold on Obama lies.
B. Require that a budget be enacted by 12/3113. Budget would have to impose draconian cuts in federal departments such as Ag, Commerce, EPA, Energy, Ed.
C. Impose an immediate hiring freeze on all non-military departments and agencies. Impose an immediate 24 month ban on all new regulations and then require cost/ benefit analysis.
D. Remove the Obama prohibitions on energy exploration & extraction. A $40 barrel of oil price is a fantastic tax-in-kind cut.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
oh-heck, 12/11/2012 12:08:10 AM (No. 9058804)
Seriously, Obama was hoping to cut a bargain so he could ignore the spending cuts and continue to redistribute wealth. Then he was going to push for a carbon tax and start laying the ground work for raising taxes again on the top 2% and end the extension for the middle class in 2014. It throws a monkey wrench into his plans to end all these giveaways (Payroll tax, earned income credits, extended unemployment, etc) and to expect that the money go to pay down the deficit. The spending cuts through Sequester hurt even more. But he signed the bills last year.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
kelty, 12/11/2012 12:29:30 AM (No. 9058819)
I´m sure if they had managed to find a way to tax accrued wealth instead of income, reign in offshores, people would have preferred it, but this is all that was offered.
If there were any kind of feeling at all that "the rich" still felt any kind of loyalty to the US or its people, over global and cheap labor - I don´t think the percentages would have been so high.
That´s what conservatives need to address.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Nevadadad46, 12/11/2012 1:51:07 AM (No. 9058842)
Yeah. for sure, I´m a cliff diver. Let´s just do it and see what comes out at the rocky bottom. It´s the only way to wake up these brain dead zombiefied Øbama voters. Let them march into the liberal Utopia to see what´s inside it- Just like Pelosie´s answer to the Øbama care law too big and bothersome to understand- "We have to pass it to find out what´s in it." Idiots are in charge now- let them see the result of their idiocy.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Spidey, 12/11/2012 2:19:01 AM (No. 9058853)
Expecting blood sucking,low information people to see the failure of their almighty chosen one ain´t gonna happen.There´s more than enough people in this country we can win with if we motivate them to the polls.
There´s no apathy on the left because their reward is financial.The republicans have to win on more intangible things and it´s a tough sell.
Our biggest problem isn´t the minority vote but stupid white people´s votes.We´re being targeted for extinction and these people are too damn stupid to see it.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
iamtinman, 12/11/2012 2:22:14 AM (No. 9058854)
If conservatves have lost the arguement then we are doomed to repeat the disaster of the past 4 years.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
TXknitter, 12/11/2012 2:24:56 AM (No. 9058857)
As long as our side helps Dems to rescue dumbo voters/citizens from living in the consequences of Obama´s socialist utopian policies, America will continue to slide to the bottom.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Phil_hk, 12/11/2012 3:38:11 AM (No. 9058875)
I have said and believe the only hope is for a terrorist attack that kills several million Obama voters.
The only other option is a genocidal civil war. Come on Muslims nuke NYC, LA and several other large liberal cities.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
sunsong, 12/11/2012 4:37:55 AM (No. 9058896)
Good article. I think those are worthy questions to consider no matter the issue. We do need to pick our battles wisely. My view right now is that if we can´t get a good deal with significant cuts - then it´s time to call Obama´s bluff and see if he wants to go over the cliff over $85 billion.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Japanorama, 12/11/2012 5:22:14 AM (No. 9058907)
The argument is simple: Either you are for or against the American experiment. One side wants to abandon it and hop the boat back to Europe. The other side seeks to preserve this land of unprecedented freedom. On which side are you? On which side were your parents?
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
OhMy, 12/11/2012 5:51:52 AM (No. 9058929)
Stand fast on the debt ceiling and watch the takers attack Obama. The cry baby should understand he will never win the taker vote but he could loose the votes that put him where he is if he doesn´t do what needs to be done. It is too late to change horses in this race. No more extensions to unemployment insurance. No govt spending is a stimulant. It is sucking dry the private sector. The "redistribution" is not from the rich to the poor but from the productive private sector to the parasitic public sector and unions.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
clayusmcret, 12/11/2012 6:01:52 AM (No. 9058933)
Peter, like obama, misses the problem entirely. It´s not about blame. It´s about the very future of our country. It is impossible to sustain the governmental eating machine and still remain afloat much longer. We simply cannot borrow our way into oblivion and continue to think that we´re an economically sound country. At some point, very soon, the equivalent to an magnetic flip of the earth is going to occur and the 50 United States of America is going to cease to exist. I guess the real problem is.....is that obama´s end goal?
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
EllaZella, 12/11/2012 7:19:32 AM (No. 9058986)
When we borrow 50 cents for every dollar we spend, and the suggestion is to hike the top marginal tax rate by a few percent, the math doesn´t work. Just to maintain present spending, we would have to more than double the tax money coming in.
Taking it all from the rich would kill the goose and stop the tax income. I think the point is to kill the goose.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
convert, 12/11/2012 8:40:16 AM (No. 9059116)
The Republicans have lost the argument-clearly and unequivocably. If we go over the fiscal cliff, Repubs will be blamed and we´ll lose more seats in 2014. I think we have to negotiate the smallest increase possible and try to then get some major cuts in return. That´s our only option. I´m not happy about it or advocating it, but I´m pretty positive that´s where we are. The American people are in deep, deep denial and frankly, very ignorant, thanks to our media, of what the real numbers mean.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
nonsense, 12/11/2012 9:33:12 AM (No. 9059220)
#3 and #6 Not to mention the VAT that has Demonrats drooling. All that lovely money that they can steal from each and every American, even the 50% who so far contribute not one thin dime to the Treasury. If they get their dream wish, we will all be even poorer.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
|
Maryland girl is armed with arguments against gun control
|
|
Washington Times, by David Sherfinski
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/7/2013 11:26:36 PM
Post Reply
|
|
A three-minute video of Sarah Merkle’s testimony about Maryland’s new gun legislation has drawn more than 2 million views on YouTube, won her praise from gun rights advocates across the country and even scored her an interview on national television last week. But the 15-year-old from Baltimore said she cares more about her message. “The biggest part of this is that the pro-gun, Second Amendment argument is getting publicity,” she said. “I like that it actually got out there, and not just because it’s me, but because it’s the argument.”
|
Filibuster gains support to delay gun control vote
|
|
Washington Times, by David Sherfinski
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/7/2013 11:25:18 PM
Post Reply
|
|
A growing number of senators are trying to quash gun legislation before it even hits the chamber floor as Democrats hold out hope for a compromise and the White House gears up for a weeklong offensive to pressure Congress to act. Larry Pratt, executive director of Gun Owners of America, said as many as 13 senators now publicly support a filibuster on the motion to proceed on pending gun legislation, which effectively would block debate on the bill. “When you’re in a snake pit, you kill a snake any time and chance that you get,”
|
| |
|
White House looks to salvage gun-control legislation
|
|
Washington Times, by Tim Devaney
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/7/2013 11:22:42 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Obama administration took to the airwaves Sunday morning to call on Republicans to back the president’s plan for gun control. In interviews on “Fox News Sunday” and ABC’s “This Week,”Dan Pfeiffer, a senior White House adviser, pointed out that 90 percent of Americans support President Obama’s plan to expand background checks on citizens who purchase guns, and he pressured Republicans to get on board with what he said where “common-sense measures.” “You can’t get 90 percent of Americans to agree on the weather,” Mr. Pfeiffer said on “Fox News Sunday.” Mr. Pfeiffer warned that a potential Republican filibuster
|
Bipartisan unity on North Korea: Republicans praise Obama’s handling of threat
|
|
Washington Times, by Guy Taylor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/7/2013 11:20:32 PM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama won rare foreign policy praise from Republicans for his administration’s handling of the North Korea crisis, as China signaled a possible readiness to play a more active role in pressuring Pyongyang away from provoking a military conflict. Two influential Republicans commended the White House on separate news talk shows Sunday for striking an effective balance by allowing senior Cabinet members to issue cautionary remarks in response to North Korea, while also strategically adjusting the U.S. military posture in the region. “This administration’s acted responsibly,” said Sen. Lindsey Graham
|
Senate has become more partisan, less collegial — more like the House
|
|
Washington Post, by Chris Cillizza
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/7/2013 11:17:33 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The world’s greatest deliberative body has started to look a lot like its legislative little brother over the past few years. The Senate was once regarded as the home of the great political orators of the time — not to mention the body where true dealmaking actually took place. Its members prided themselves on their cool approach to legislating, in contrast with the more brawling nature of the House. Senators, generally, liked one another — no matter their party — and weren’t afraid to show it, either personally or politically. No longer. The Senate has undergone a marked transformation
|
|
Gun legislation’s prospects improve
|
|
Washington Post, by Ed O´Keefe and Philip Rucker
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/7/2013 11:14:37 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Prospects for a bipartisan deal to expand federal background checks for gun purchases are improving with the emergence of fresh Republican support, according to top Senate aides. The possibility that after weeks of stalled negotiations senators might be on the cusp of a breakthrough comes as President Obama and his top surrogates will begin on Monday their most aggressive push yet to rally Americans around his gun-control agenda. Even though polls show that a universal background-check system is supported by nine in 10 Americans, the president has been unable to translate popular support
|
|
An act of political malpractice
|
|
Washington Post, by Ruth Marcus
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/7/2013 11:12:28 PM
Post Reply
|
|
On the matter of the president and Kamala Harris, I could go either way. I could write a column — call it Classic Feminist High Dudgeon — lamenting the president’s comments about the California attorney general’s good looks. This column would discuss the continuing, albeit more subtle, discrimination against women in the workplace. It would explain how, even if unintentionally, Obama’s reference to Harris’s attractiveness is demeaning — that it serves, in the apologetic words of White House press secretary Jay Carney, “to diminish the attorney general’s professional accomplishments and her capabilities.” It would, inevitably, invoke the president’s daughters
|
Democrats push problem solvers in House contests
|
|
Washington Post, by Paul Kane
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:38:26 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Democratic Party officials believe that Kevin Strouse is exactly the kind of candidate who can help them retake the House next year. He’s a smart, young former Army Ranger — good qualities for any aspiring politician. But what party leaders really like is that Strouse doesn’t have particularly strong views on the country’s hottest issues. Immigration? Tax policy? “Certainly I have a lot of research to do,” Strouse acknowledged in an interview Thursday as he announced his candidacy in a suburban Philadelphia House district. Strouse’s candidacy reflects an emerging
|
Texas prosecutors’ slayings unnerve rural Kaufman County
|
|
Washington Post, by Stephanie McCrummen
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:33:08 PM
Post Reply
|
|
KAUFMAN, Tex. — The judge was on the phone. “Yep, I said I’ll do anything,” Bruce Wood told the person on the other end, rubbing his forehead. “They asked me to do a eulogy. I don’t know what I’m going to say.” Elsewhere in the Kaufman County Courthouse, a sheriff’s deputy was handing out bulletproof vests. “I brought the smallest one,” he said to a secretary, who stared at the khaki armor as he explained how to adjust the side straps should the need arise. “These have the neck for a female.” Outside, two armed guards
|
Vanishing workforce weighs on growth
|
|
Washington Post, by Jim Tankersley
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:28:59 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Put out an all-points bulletin: Millions of Americans have gone missing from the workforce. Every month that those would-be workers are gone raises the odds that they might never come back, dimming the prospects for future economic growth. The vanishing trend is more than a decade old, but it accelerated during the Great Recession. Throughout 2012, economists held out hope that it had stopped. But then came Friday’s jobs report, and hopes were dashed. The Labor Department reported that the U.S. labor force — everyone who has a job or is looking for one — shrank
|
A Reporter Explains Why Gun Coverage Is So Biased
|
|
Power Line, by John Hinderaker
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 9:13:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Well, not intentionally. But Jim Ragsdale of the Minneapolis Star Tribune attended a conference in Chicago on covering gun issues, which he describes this way: “Covering Guns” brought reporters with front-line experience covering mass shootings in Tucson, Ariz.; Aurora, Colo.; Newtown, Conn., and Red Lake, Minn., to meet with gun experts and advocates and gun trainers. Sponsored by the Poynter journalism center and funded by the McCormick Foundation of Chicago, we gathered in a city that witnessed 506 homicides last year. The idea, I take it
|
Report: Carbon Emissions in US Lowest Since 1994
|
|
PJ Media, by Rick Moran
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 9:03:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Carbon emissions in the US were at their lowest level in 2012 since 1994, according to figures released by the US Energy Information Administration. We did it without carbon trading scams, the EPA making carbon dioxide a poison, or obeying the dictates of the Kyoto climate Treaty. We did it partly because of decreased economic activity as a result of the Obama recovery-that-isn’t, but mostly because of good old fashioned market forces; competition between natural gas and coal: Energy-related carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in 2012 were the lowest in the United States since 1994
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
´My bangs are getting a little irritating´: Michelle Obama admits she already regrets her high-maintenance hairdo
|
|
Daily Mail (UK), by Margot Peppers
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: pineledger- 4/7/2013 7:43:42 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Michelle Obama has admitted that she is already tired of the bangs she first sported in January. The First Lady said in an interview with Entertainment Tonight: ´Bangs are a day-by-day proposition. They´re starting to grow out, get a little irritating.´ Still, she hasn´t let her hairdo woes get her down. ´It´s okay,´ she said after her initial complaint. ´We´ll be good.´ The first indication that her hairstyle was becoming a burden came about last weekend, when Malia, 14, was spotted adjusting her mother´s hair during the White House Easter Egg Roll.
|
McCain: ´I don´t understand´ GOP filibuster on guns
|
|
Politico, by Jennifer Epstein
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/7/2013 12:18:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Sen. John McCain says he doesn´t understand the threats from some of his Republican colleagues to filibuster a bill on background checks to buy guns. "I don´t understand it," the Arizona Republican said on Sunday of the threat coming from Sen. Rand Paul,Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen. Mike Lee and nine other Republicans. "The purpose of the United States Senate is to debate and to vote and to let the people know where we stand.” "What are we afraid of? ... If this issue is as important as we all think it is, why not take ... it up and debate?"
|
Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney General´ Comment Was a Gaffe
|
|
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that
|
Christians, here´s why we´re losing our religion
|
|
Fox News, by Craig Groeschel
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: STLstudent- 4/7/2013 5:13:55 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Recent research indicates that the number of people who do not consider themselves a part of an organized religion is steadily on the rise. Interestingly enough, though the number of those religiously unaffiliated is increasing, there is little to no trend in the number of those who express atheist or agnostic beliefs. People aren’t saying they don’t believe in God. They’re saying they don’t believe in religion. They are not rejecting Christ. They are rejecting the church. This begs the question, “Why are we losing our religion?”
|
Broadcasters worry about ´Zero TV´ homes
|
|
Associated Press, by Ryan Nakashima
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Ribicon- 4/7/2013 2:43:40 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Los Angeles — Some people have had it with TV. They´ve had enough of the 100-plus channel universe. They don´t like timing their lives around network show schedules. They´re tired of $100-plus monthly bills. A growing number of them have stopped paying for cable and satellite TV service, and don´t even use an antenna to get free signals over the air. (Snip) Last month, the Nielsen Co. started labeling people in this group "Zero TV" households, because they fall outside the traditional definition of a TV home. There are 5 million of these residences in the U.S., up from
|
Mother Of Slain Benghazi Officer To Sean Hannity: ‘They Want Me To Shut Up’
|
|
Mediaite, by A.J. Delgado
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:00:16 AM
Post Reply
|
|
On Friday, Sean Hannity brought Pat Smith, mother of the late Sean Smith, on his radio program. The 34-year-old information management officer was one of four Americans murdered in the Benghazi embassy attack on September 11, 2012. In the chilling interview, a distraught Ms. Smith, in tears, pleaded for answers and spoke of the efforts to silence her. Ms. Smith first relayed how her son, prior to the attack, requested additional security in advance and warned the State Department: He did tell them, ahead of time, he typed it into his little typewriter over there,
|
Vanishing workforce weighs on growth
|
|
Washington Post, by Jim Tankersley
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:28:59 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Put out an all-points bulletin: Millions of Americans have gone missing from the workforce. Every month that those would-be workers are gone raises the odds that they might never come back, dimming the prospects for future economic growth. The vanishing trend is more than a decade old, but it accelerated during the Great Recession. Throughout 2012, economists held out hope that it had stopped. But then came Friday’s jobs report, and hopes were dashed. The Labor Department reported that the U.S. labor force — everyone who has a job or is looking for one — shrank
|
Hillary Clinton Would Not ´Clear the Field´ for 2016
|
|
New Republic, by Tod Lindberg
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/6/2013 5:22:36 AM
Post Reply
|
|
No one is more preoccupied these days with Hillary Clinton´s 2016 plans than the Beltway political class—not even the former presidential candidate herself. To hear some tell it, her decision will be dispositive for all other Democrats thinking of entering the race. And pundits and reporters aren´t the only ones positing the "The Hillary Factor": No less than the House Democratic whip, Steny Hoyer, told BuzzFeed, “I don´t know that anybody would run against Hillary…. If she runs, she clears the field.” It´s an understandable conclusion, given Clinton´s stature in the Democratic Party and her 70 percent
|
Obama critic apologizes for his ´poorly chosen words´ on gay marriage
|
|
The Hill [Washington DC], by Alexandra Jaffe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/6/2013 12:18:19 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson, considered by some to be a potential Republican contender for president, apologized to Johns Hopkins University for the "poorly chosen words" he used in expressing his opposition to gay marriage last month.“I am sorry for any embarrassment this has caused,” Carson said in the letter, reported in New York Magazine.(Snip) "Although I do believe marriage is between a man and a woman, there are much less offensive ways to make that point. I hope all will look at a lifetime of service over some poorly chosen words.” Carson will remain as commencement speaker at Johns Hopkins,
|
The Secrets of Princeton
|
|
New York Times, by Ross Douthat
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 8:08:09 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Susan Patton, the Princeton alumna who became famous for her letter urging Ivy League women to use their college years to find a mate, has been denounced as a traitor to feminism, to coeducation, to the university ideal. But really she’s something much more interesting: a traitor to her class. Her betrayal consists of being gauche enough to acknowledge publicly a truth that everyone who’s come up through Ivy League culture knows intuitively —
|
Beyonce, Jay-Z celebrate 5th anniversary in Havana, Cuba
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Nardine Saad
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 4/6/2013 8:20:04 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Beyonce and Jay-Z celebrated their fifth wedding anniversary in Cuba this week. The couple, who married on April 4, 2008, took in the sights of Old Havana, visited a school, dined on a rooftop terrace and strolled the fan-filled streets in their island best.(snip).The power couple declined to answer journalists´ questions about their visit to the island nation, but some outlets are reporting that the moguls are there as tourists, though that would be illegal because of the half-century embargo the U.S. has on the Communist country. However, the Miami Herald said Washington has issued special licenses for
|
| | |
|