A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy

































   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


Romney´s defeat caused by
´extraordinary´ drop in white
male support as autopsy of
failed Republican campaign
gets underway

Daily Mail [UK], by Daniel Bates

Original Article

Posted By:Attercliffe, 12/5/2012 6:27:56 AM

Mitt Romney lost the election after an ‘extraordinary’ collapse in support among white men, the very group the Republicans counted on to turn out for him. As the official inquest into the defeat got underway, the former Presidential candidate’s own pollster revealed his lead among white males was cut from 27 points to as low as 12 points. Staff revealed that nobody had even read Clint Eastwood’s speech at the Republican National Convention which caused them deep embarrassment. And in another blow, Romney’s own campaign manager also admitted that his infamous 47 percent comment was ‘the epitome of low

Comments:
I understand the Clint and 47% problems. Yeah, I know--the media. I thought Clint Eastwood was hysterically funny but not everyone has the same sense of humor.

But the precipitous drop in voting by white men?

Wow! As much as 15 points. Why? Was it because they didn´t like Romney or Mormonism--don´t like him so I won´t vote at all--so there! (Stamped-foot syndrome.) Was this, at least in part, the effect of resentful Ron Paul supporters?

Somebody with a good brain better get that analyzed--fast. 2016 is coming right up.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: uno, 12/5/2012 6:34:00 AM     (No. 9049311)

I dunno...I witnessed a ton more enthusiasm for Mitt than I felt or saw with Dole or McCain and if you didn´t care for Mitt there were a lot more reasons to "hold your nose" and vote for Mitt than there ever were in the past.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Jethro bo, 12/5/2012 6:37:12 AM     (No. 9049318)

Romney tried to close the gender gap by appealing to women. Nothing wrong with that but he forgot that men are about half of the population as well. I haven´t been enthused about a Rebublican candidate since Reagan. Seems the Rebublicans want to run metrosexuals and it just doesn´t work for a lot of men. We want leaders, not metrosexuals.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Spidey, 12/5/2012 6:42:02 AM     (No. 9049323)

I don´t doubt that Romney bled white males at the very end but it didn´t have anything to do with Eastwood.He started talking more and more about reaching across the aisle in the waning days of the campaign. He also said in the debates he would carry on a lot of Obama´s policies.This had to come form his moronic advisers who pounded him with various ideas to win the middle of the country.

It was also a tough sell saying he´d get rid of Obamacare when the plan was based on his own.He should have also picked a woman or minority as his running mate,Ryan didn´t deliver any discernible votes that I can tell.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Country Boy, 12/5/2012 6:45:51 AM     (No. 9049326)

Basic assumption here is that massive election fraud DID NOT happen. On the other hand, rumors abounded that the Spanish company that runs the electronic voting machines was in obama´s back pocket. Also disturbing is that the RNC is not allowed to challenge the DNC in an election. Voting Rights Act, whatever.

http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2012/11/15/why-the-gop-will-not-do-anything-about-vote-fraud/

If voting is suspect, we are in a third world country.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Kitty Myers, 12/5/2012 6:57:56 AM     (No. 9049335)

#4 Dittos!


Reply 6 - Posted by: Nimby, 12/5/2012 7:07:44 AM     (No. 9049345)

There is plenty of blame to spread around. Bottom line, election was stolen


Reply 7 - Posted by: doodah, 12/5/2012 7:10:18 AM     (No. 9049347)

#4, ditto, dittos! Baby, it was fraud. You should see what the Dems did in the largest county in my state. They are still finding "lost" votes. The Dems in charge were not quite as slick as the Dems in battleground states and tried to do the same thing and couldn´t carry it off. Now that it is "settled", however, nothing will be done. West should have hung on. Hoping Fox gets him for a show. He is very articulate. And with zero having all of MSNBC over for tea, we will need all the media help that we can get to oppose marching orders given to Sharpton and the rest of the toadies.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: thelmalou, 12/5/2012 7:10:41 AM     (No. 9049348)

I´m with #4 and #5. However, if Romney had garnered really strong support, the fraud wouldn´t have worked. I will never understand the mind of the American voter. :bleaksigh:


Reply 9 - Posted by: Revolution76, 12/5/2012 7:17:30 AM     (No. 9049356)

Easily hacked computerized voting machines will override voter enthusiasm every time. There was every only one candidate on the ballot, regardless what your voting machine may have read. There will be no more free elections.


Reply 10 - Posted by: bmoc, 12/5/2012 7:22:20 AM     (No. 9049361)

I believe it was the sudden emergence of Scytl software rather than the sudden popularity of Obama. I saw several speeches by Romney/Ryan to tens of thousands and the speeches by Obama/Biden to tens. I know of no one on our side who ´staying home´ to protest anything but know of many on their side who stayed home because they didn´t like their choice. They can tell me all day long about how this happened and that happened but unless their theory involves massive cheating, I ain´t buying.


Reply 11 - Posted by: mean Gene, 12/5/2012 7:35:03 AM     (No. 9049384)

This was exactly Obama´s aim.
If you recall before election day, his cohorts were using every trick in the book to try to convince the lower-educated WHITE working male that his going out to vote was just a waste of time.
Apparently it worked.
People can be had.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Jebediah, 12/5/2012 7:35:32 AM     (No. 9049385)

Not to jump on the man( a decent soul with an important message) when he is down, but I can remember people like Larry Kudlow and many others offering real campaign advice, and never even getting a reply from said campaign. My own son in Denver paid for a Romney yard sign in a sea of Obama signs and it took over 6 weeks and three calls, plus me mentioning it on Lucianne, to even get that. And for me, most egregious, they made almost no use of Paul Ryan!!!!!!! They knew it all, and it turn out they knew little. But this white male thing just stuns me.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: heartlandgal, 12/5/2012 7:36:13 AM     (No. 9049388)

How come Obama can come out and say that they are not even going after the white male vote and that´s ok. I don´t believe that white males didn´t vote for Romney, it doesn´t make sense.


Reply 14 - Posted by: anonymous, 12/5/2012 7:39:03 AM     (No. 9049390)

I think a lot of this retrospective analysis is ridiculous and a form of re-writing of history. The campaign is over. It´s important to move on and start re-building for the future. It can be done, and it will be done.


Reply 15 - Posted by: JAN, 12/5/2012 7:39:06 AM     (No. 9049391)

Romney defeat caused by massive voter fraud.


Reply 16 - Posted by: GoVirginia!, 12/5/2012 7:46:27 AM     (No. 9049401)

Stolen, folks. I know lots of high techies and they assure me that the computer software could be easily EASILY programmed to start changing Romney votes to Obama votes at some specific percentage of Romney to Obama winning. Suddenly every, say, third Romney vote flips to Obama, keeping the percentages just hign enough not to seem odd.

That day, or the day after, this could have been found by experts, but of course, the Repubs stuck their heads...uh, in the sand...and whimpered off, sniviling excuses and accusations against the R campaigns instead of screaming bloody murder. They like to lose, believe they should lose and therefore, LOSE. Bye bye America.


Reply 17 - Posted by: Teleologicus, 12/5/2012 7:47:59 AM     (No. 9049404)

Lots of reasons, as there are for most complex human phenomena. One reason is that Mitt Romney ran a terrible campaign. A lot of people didn´t even know he was running for president until it was too late. Many of us sounded the alarm, cried warnings, pointed out that something was seriously wrong with the campaign. We were ignored or dismissed as naysayers. Only at the very last minute, beginning with the first debate, did Romney begin to campaign like he meant to win. Too little, too late. He just stood there like a cigar store Indian for at least a year while the Leftist-media slime and character assassination worked him over night and day seven days a week. He never once counter-attacked on any of Obama´s nearly limitless number of personal and political vulnerabilities. He called Obama "a nice guy." He thought he could win by acting like he was above the grubby, nasty, smelly sort of gutter politics that Democrats have long since mastered and which their tools in the news media use against Republicans and conservatives. Bad campaign, bad results. It is not impossible he might have won, though the odds were always against him. He could certainly have made a better showing. That he did not is no one´s fault but his own. The buck stops with him. He contributed mightily to his own defeat.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Starlady, 12/5/2012 7:52:36 AM     (No. 9049408)

I agree that fraud was a major player in this election. I also think many young white males are more libertarian than GOP now. My oldest son did vote Romney, but he said after the loss he will never vote GOP again, he wants a libertarian option. I think the GOP is one small step away from death, it has become a useless party.


Reply 19 - Posted by: pickle1, 12/5/2012 7:58:03 AM     (No. 9049419)

The Lefties PR at work. They know this is a lie.


Reply 20 - Posted by: god of irony, 12/5/2012 8:04:33 AM     (No. 9049431)

I think the drop in white male support can be attributed anti-Mormom bigots. Go back look at some of the threads here at L.com. This place used to be run over by the "I´d never vote for a Mormon" crowd but when he won the party nomination it went silent. Those people didn´t change their minds, they just didn´t vote.


Reply 21 - Posted by: R. Edgar, 12/5/2012 8:07:49 AM     (No. 9049437)

Yes, the computerized voting systems seem to have the same level of integrity as those Cherrymaster video gambling machines you find in a dive bar or a questionable convenience store. They are all video, not mechanical, even though they look like they have slot machine reels. So you think you won the jackpot because for a split second you swear that you saw a bell and it´s now a cherry? It was a bell, but the microprocessor and the settings of the little DIP switches inside determine the payout percentage, which is whatever the programmer wants. Bell, Cherry; Romney, Obama.


Reply 22 - Posted by: Elvira, 12/5/2012 8:13:26 AM     (No. 9049445)

#14 I´m sorry, but really? Those who do not learn from history, yada- yada-yada...

Yes, the election was stolen. As a software engineer, this was child´s play. Back to hard copy votes? I´m not sure, but theft on this level is a lot harder to achieve.

My question is where the HE!! was Ryan besides posing for those silly pictures? What a waste of raw talent!


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: CurryCat, 12/5/2012 8:16:09 AM     (No. 9049448)

I´m tired of the analysis and analysis of the analysis. It´s like Monday AM quarterbacking where everyone fantasizes about what could have or should have happened. Let´s move on-perfererably with a conservative viewpoint


Reply 24 - Posted by: earlybird, 12/5/2012 8:20:26 AM     (No. 9049458)

I do not believe this. Flipping this on its head, do you really believe that white mails voted in droves for Obama? Or that they somehow switched from Romney to Obama before the election?

There may have been sour grapes types who sat out the election, or just couldn´t be bothered. They didn´t understand what was at stake, or they decided to make their own pathetic "statement" (which no one but them noticed).

There may have been the usual apathetics who don´t believe voting is all that important, or to whom it is a matter of mood on election day. Too much effort? Stay home.

There is no question in my mind that (1) the Democrats stick together and vote for the candidate who ends up with the (D) next to their name; (2) they do not divide up into factions the way Republicans do and are still doing, thus maintaining united strength; (3) they are more passionate about their cause, no matter how mindless it may be, and work harder for it than Republicans do. And they fight dirty.


Reply 25 - Posted by: earlybird, 12/5/2012 8:21:50 AM     (No. 9049463)

#24 should have said:

Flipping this on its head, do you really believe that white males voted in droves for Obama?


Reply 26 - Posted by: Blue-Z-Anna, 12/5/2012 8:28:58 AM     (No. 9049477)

Massive voter fraud leading to implementation of Marxist Economic Criminality and Dictatorial, one party rule does not bring out the best in me.

A bigger government manned with leftist thugs and idealogs puts a serious hurt on my happy place.

An opposition who cares nothing for the rules does not help me towards remaining a cheerful promoter of all things libertarian.

I´ll take the ´Crazy´ of Newt & Nuggent over the hyper-politeness that just cost us an election.


Reply 27 - Posted by: Catherine, 12/5/2012 8:41:53 AM     (No. 9049492)

I don´t like Mitt and did not want him to be president. I did, however, vote for him since I didn´t like his opponent.

However, I don´t think he lost. I think the democrats have refined stealing elections to an art. And the dummy Repubs just sit there and pretend it was a real election. It was over and done with by 5 p.m. California time. The crowd was waiting for his appearance screaming in victory. He and the wife and kids showed up, at 5 p.m. California time, took a bow and waltzed away to do whatever. We were set up.

Now on the other hand, I think the Repubs have one more chance to get it right. Do I think they got the message? No.


Reply 28 - Posted by: GoPack, 12/5/2012 9:01:55 AM     (No. 9049522)

You folks talking about stolen elections need to get your heads examined. Please deal with reality like we always ask the Dems to do.


Reply 29 - Posted by: Sunhan65, 12/5/2012 9:19:26 AM     (No. 9049547)

Romney´s pollster says they lost. Based on the Romney Campaign´s own polling data. Understand that. These are the people Mitt Romney paid to tell him what was happening--Romney´s people, not Obama´s, not Acorn, the Dems, or Spanish voting machines. Based on Romney´s polling data, they say he lost support among a crucial voting group. They say why: His 47% comment alienated people (there are a lot of decent Republicans who don´t pay Federal income tax) and Clint´s chair chat negated Romney´s convention bounce. At the time these things happened, some of us pointed these things out, and were excoriated by the Romney enthusiasts. Now that the same words are coming from the Romney Campaign, maybe they will listen and learn. But I doubt it. P.S. #20, Romney ran even with Bush 2004 among Evangelicals and ahead of Bush with Protestants overall. He lost votes in two major religious groups: Hispanic Catholics and Mormons. Presumably the anti-Mormon bigots you say decided this election were Mormon anti-Mormon bigots.


Reply 30 - Posted by: question_complexity, 12/5/2012 9:20:19 AM     (No. 9049550)

I think we have a problem until every old fart of the Akin/Mourdock mold has passed away. Not just women were repulsed by the ignorance of their opinions (and by the idiocy of saying them out loud). How many others in the party hold those views? To many Americans, they became the definition of a "conservative Republican".



Reply 31 - Posted by: Safari Man, 12/5/2012 9:25:08 AM     (No. 9049558)

Those who say we´re crazy to think the dimocrats might do something unethical ignore lots and lots of history and evidence to the contrary. Our election system has no auditing facility, no paper trail. Fraud is made easier by electronic reporting -- hacking is traceless and easy to centralize. On top of that, the polls were all saying Romney was going to win, when you factor out the dimocrat bias in the turnout models.

The prize is simply too big not to cheat for them. If they got caught cheating, whats the worst that could happen? Someone go to jail and they lose? People would give their lives for Obama and communism. Going to jail is a reasonable risk since they knew they were going to lose otherwise.


Reply 32 - Posted by: bpl40, 12/5/2012 9:31:51 AM     (No. 9049573)

Vote fraud is like anthropogenic global warming. Yes it is happening but is it a material and major cause without which the climate won´t change? We don´t know and it seems unlikely. The widespread nature of 0bama´s lead and the p**s poor performance of key Senate candidates says we should not waste our time barking up this tree till 2016. The unanticipated drop in white male voters, which escaped even the last minute polls, is the key. We need fast answers on that.


Reply 33 - Posted by: plumnellie, 12/5/2012 9:35:15 AM     (No. 9049584)

I am sick to my stomach that Romney lost. But, most of us knew he might based on his lack of passion, blood and guts fighting, and reliance on staid ol white men from the ´club´. Posters who think they can win by making us vote for out of touch, out of idea men are crazy. The lack of any fight from Romney...yes I liked his debates but they only appealed to his supporters..not anyone on the fence. White men felt Romney was an empty guy..not someone they could trust to stay the course. All posters who keep supporting the Dole/McCain/Romney/Boehner types are damaging our country just as much as the Obama people.


Reply 34 - Posted by: Sanspeur, 12/5/2012 9:39:35 AM     (No. 9049594)

And Clint´s speech was terrific! It wasn´t written, it was improv! Perhaps the only thing memorable in the blah, lazy campaign of the rinos.


Reply 35 - Posted by: enuf8, 12/5/2012 9:40:20 AM     (No. 9049596)

Or, was it the trusting of the voting machines which converted votes from Romney to jugears?


Reply 36 - Posted by: smcchk, 12/5/2012 9:41:16 AM     (No. 9049598)

Loss of support? That doesn´t explain my neighborhood and town being covered with Romney yard signs, in yards where I have never seen political signs in 22 years. Nor does it explain friends of mine, never interested in politics, then showing up at rallies and talking openly of this being our last chance. And it hardly explains the Obama with Bruce Springsteen rally held in Madison 2 days before the election and the turnout was less than a fifth of what the city planned for. There was great enthusiasm for Romney!


Reply 37 - Posted by: pearlyjo, 12/5/2012 9:56:19 AM     (No. 9049641)

I vote fraud.
With that said, I have a couple of thoughts. I believe Mr. Romney actually did win on November 6. So, Mr. Obama is governing a country that did not want him re-elected. That could prove to be difficult for him in the coming months.
Secondly, for those who helped with the fraud, is this the country you want to live in? Is this the country you want for your children and grandchildren? A country where elections can be rigged?
Lastly, for our friends in the media, is this the country you want? A media that picks the winners and losers? A media that hides the truth in order to serve an idealogy? Your children have to live here in the future too.
It will be an interesting four years as Hilary begins her looooonnnggg campaign for the presidency. She will have to run against the present president and that could get messy.


Reply 38 - Posted by: ebuilder, 12/5/2012 10:34:19 AM     (No. 9049744)

Imagine who establishment republicans have already selected to run in 2014 and 2016. Imagine they will not imagine or cannot stop the ongoing transforming democrat coup. Imagine the political junky conservzative base will not be turning out ever again. So imagine establishment republicans are planning to lose even when their opponent is an unvetted anti-American, and a serial committer of high crimes, crimes against nature, and crimes against Christendom. Imagine there is no post-election plan for establishment republicans except to blame the blameless.


Reply 39 - Posted by: thethirdruffian, 12/5/2012 10:41:38 AM     (No. 9049762)

I know most posters here drank the Myth cool aid, but most conservatives didn´t.

The only reason to vote for Myth was to vote against Obama.

Given Myth was a slimey liar, who slandered actual conservatives during not one, but two, Republican primaries, many people just could not hold their nose hard enough to pull the lever for Myth.

The answer is not to be mad at actual conservatives as posters like to do here; the answer is to actively oppose fakes like Romney in the polifical process and give conservatives a conservative choice for whom to vote.


Reply 40 - Posted by: tisHimself, 12/5/2012 10:52:32 AM     (No. 9049808)

funny thing about white guys in flyover country. They don´t like being played. By crypto marxist urban troublemakers, or by boarding school club tie elitists. The establishment and the $tragists who love them assumed that as long as these guys were disconnected from the current White House occupant, probably because they were all redneck, bigoted duffeses ( duffei?), they´d vote for any old white guy, even if he did smell like the guy in the back of limo that smiled and waved as he drove the front of whatever line they were waiting in.

Once more, the 2010 elections and the rise of the T party, which establishment people remind us, like cosa nostra, doesn´t exist, was a repudiation of the bi partisan political class, which includes the republican establishment. So a primary that ignored the T party and pretty much denigrated any and all of their champions, pretty much disinvited those severe conservative white guys from day one.


Reply 41 - Posted by: pineledger, 12/5/2012 11:05:20 AM     (No. 9049844)

I think Clint was just fine and so do the majority of people who voted. Problem is, the election was tinkered with.


Reply 42 - Posted by: capt scurvey, 12/5/2012 11:16:10 AM     (No. 9049885)

Yeah, I guess that would explain the record-breaking republican voter registrations and all the massive lines at the polling stations, wouldn´t it?

Twits...


Reply 43 - Posted by: 901AtTheRiver, 12/5/2012 11:34:21 AM     (No. 9049942)

I don´t believe this at ALL. Every conservative I know voted and every one of them voted for Romney. I also don´t believe this was any where near an honest election. In honest elections the voters wear purple thumbs after and the paper ballots are counted by humans.


Reply 44 - Posted by: Stopstoreload, 12/5/2012 12:26:09 PM     (No. 9050051)

C? Swati tolja. See my Boehner remarks above. We lost because more of them showed up to vote than we did. I´m embarrassed for us. Romney deserved better.


Reply 45 - Posted by: stealthy, 12/5/2012 3:21:18 PM     (No. 9050325)

Every thread about him here had the crotchety set sounding off undermining our side.


Reply 46 - Posted by: bob913, 12/5/2012 4:02:20 PM     (No. 9050383)

When he said obama was a nice guy.... Mitt is a democrat lite. I still would want him as president then obama. The 14 million who didn´t vote don´t have a clue as to the damage obama will try to do.

obama now has John Boehner working with him!


Reply 47 - Posted by: Squirelane123, 12/5/2012 5:02:46 PM     (No. 9050451)

Three thoughts:
1.Agree with #40, Romney and his people ignored the Tea Party. When Sara wasn´t invited to the convention I thought uh oh! Glenn Beck may have been a better candidate /s.
2. The corrupted software didn´t need to switch votes, it just needed to drop the Romney votes and shasam "white male vote way down"
3. Voter ID´s got to be there.



Post Reply   Close thread 714478




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Attercliffe"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Attercliffe"



Lady Thatcher was a statesman. Blair
and Cameron are mere politicians
Telegraph [UK], by James Delingpole    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/8/2013 10:16:31 PM     Post Reply
Cometh the hour cometh the man. (Or woman). Except it´s not always true, is it? In 1940 we had Winston Churchill. In 1979 we had Margaret Thatcher. But I´m not sure even the most generous apologists for our current Prime Minister would bracket David Cameron in quite the same category. [Snip] One of the key differences between the two lies in their attitude to personal popularity. To the politician it matters greatly, for the primary aim of the politician is to gain and maintain power at regardless of what cost to his principles. To the statesman, however, the political process

Mark Sanford slams 1st Congressional
District rival Elizabeth Colbert Busch
on Clemson stimulus money
Post & Courier [Charleston, SC], by Schuyler Kropf    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/8/2013 1:59:44 PM     Post Reply
Republican congressional candidate Mark Sanford slammed the 2009 federal stimulus package that went to Clemson University’s wind turbine effort--where Democrat rival Elizabeth Colbert Busch is employed--as bad public policy and a poor return on the taxpayers’ investments. By Sanford’s math and reading of Obama administration stimulus allocation figures, the Wind Turbine Drivetrain Testing Facility received $43 million and “created or saved” an estimated 134 jobs. When divided, the numbers calculate to more than $320,000 per job, Sanford said. Sanford’s comments came during a visit to a Mount Pleasant branch of Lyerly’s Cleaners, where he carried in a load

Former British prime minister
Baroness Thatcher dies peacefully at the age
of 87 after suffering a massive stroke
Daily Mail [UK], by James Nye    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/8/2013 8:55:39 AM     Post Reply
Margaret Thatcher, the first female British Prime Minister who gained worldwide renown as the Iron Lady has died aged 87. Developing a formidable partnership with President Ronald Reagan during the 1980s, Mrs. Thatcher stood up to the ´Evil Empire´ of the Soviet Union, eventually witnessing its collapse. [Snip] Responding to her death, Buckingham Palace said, ´The Queen is sad to hear the news of the death of Baroness Thatcher and Her Majesty will be sending a private message of sympathy to the family, Buckingham Palace said today.´ British Prime Minster David Cameron said on hearing of her passing, ´It was

Margaret Thatcher dies
of stroke aged 87
Telegraph [UK], by Gordon Raynor, Steven Swinford    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/8/2013 8:46:23 AM     Post Reply
Baroness Thatcher, Britain´s greatest post-war prime minister, has died at the age of 87 after suffering a stroke, her family has announced. Her son, Sir Mark, and daughter Carol confirmed that she died this morning. Lord Bell, her spokesman, said: "It is with great sadness that Mark and Carol Thatcher announced that their mother Baroness Thatcher died peacefully following a stroke this morning.A further statement will be made later." [Snip] She will go down in history not only as Britain´s first female prime minister, but as the woman who transformed Britain´s economy in addition to being a formidable rival

An English class for trolls, professional
offence-takers and climate activists
Telegraph [UK], by James Delingpole    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/7/2013 10:38:34 PM     Post Reply
Should Michael Mann be given the electric chair for having concocted arguably the most risibly inept, misleading, cherry-picking, worthless and mendacious graph--the Hockey Stick--in the history of junk science? Should George Monbiot be hanged by the neck for his decade or so´s hysterical promulgation of the great climate change scam and other idiocies too numerous to mention? Should Tim Flannery be fed to the crocodiles for the role he has played in the fleecing of the Australian taxpayer and the diversion of scarce resources into pointless projects like all the eyewateringly expensive desalination plants built as a result of his

It´s Kate v Kim... The bump off!
One´s an English duchess. The other
is Hollywood royalty. And when it
comes to maternity wear, they
really ARE oceans apart
Daily Mail [UK], by Emily Hill, Emily Kent-Smith    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/6/2013 8:59:02 PM     Post Reply
They are two of the most glamorous women in the world, their every outfit forensically examined by fashionistas--and each will give birth to her first child in July. But when it comes to the style stakes, any similarities between the Duchess of Cambridge and reality star Kim Kardashian end there. Kate, 31, has always been the epitome of elegance and at six months is still svelte, with a barely-visible Royal bump. She has also stayed loyal to her classic dress style, favouring demure wrap dresses and beautifully tailored coats. Kim appears to have taken it less easily in her high-heeled

Call illegals ‘irregulars’ says Eurocrat
Daily Express [UK], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/6/2013 9:11:37 AM     Post Reply
A senior Eurocrat sparked outrage last night after calling for the phrase “illegal immigrant” to be banned from the European Union.[Snip] She has instructed EU Commission staff to refer to foreigners who break border control laws as “irregular migrants” or simply “people” instead. But her attempt to dictate how the issue of immigration is discussed was savaged last night. UK Independence Party leader Nigel Farage said: “Now the EU is even trying to change the language. “This sounds like something straight out of the pages of George Orwell’s Animal Farm. It shows that what we are dealing with here

Michael Philpott is a perfect parable
for our age: His story shows
the pervasiveness of evil born
out of welfare dependency
Daily Mail [UK], by A. N. Wilson    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/6/2013 8:56:04 AM     Post Reply
His house, his booze, his drugs, his women and his 17 children were paid for by a benefits system meant to be a safety net for the truly needy.[Snip] This was one of the most horrible crimes committed against children in Britain in recent years. It was cynical. It was calculating. And it was done out of malice in a ham-fisted plot which went wrong. The trial spoke volumes about the sheer nastiness of the individuals involved. But it also lifted the lid on the bleak and often grotesque world of the welfare benefit scroungers--of whom there are not dozens,

The reef that regenerated: Researchers find
corals in Northern Australia healed
themselves in just 12 years
Daily Mail [UK], by Mark Prigg    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/6/2013 8:07:06 AM     Post Reply
A coral reef in Northern Australia severely damaged by warming seas has managed to completely heal itself in just 12 years, stunned researchers have found. The team found that being left alone to breed on its own was key. The discovery raises hope that other damaged reefs could ´regenerate´. The new research shows that an isolated reef off the northwest coast of Australia that was severely damaged by a period of warming in 1998. It was hit by coral bleaching, caused by higher water temperatures that break down the coral´s symbiotic relationship with algae that provide food for coral growth.

North Korea moves second missile
as UN chief warns ´nuclear
threat is not a game´
Daily Express [UK], by Charlotte Meredith    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/5/2013 5:36:43 AM     Post Reply
North Korea has transported two more missiles to the east coast, Seoul military sources have revealed, triggering speculation that it is ready for an abrupt missile launch. North Korea has loaded two intermediate-range missiles onto mobile launchers and hidden them in an unidentified facility near the east coast, South Korea´s Yonhap news agency has said. "It has been confirmed that North Korea, early this week, transported two Musudan mid-range missiles by train to the east coast and loaded them on vehicles equipped with launch pads," Yonhap quoted the official as saying. The official said the mobile launchers had since

´Threatening world peace while his
people starve´: Hackers take control of
North Korea´s official Twitter and Flickr
accounts and brand Kim Jong Un a pig
Daily Mail [UK], by Becky Evans    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/5/2013 5:32:05 AM     Post Reply
Hackers posted a picture of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un portrayed as a pig on the country´s official flickr account today. The account and the official Uriminzokkiri Twitter account were apparently hacked today as tensions in the Korean Peninsula continued to rise. The North’s Uriminzokkiri Twitter and Flickr accounts stopped sending out content typical of that posted by the regime in Pyongyang, such as photos of North’s leader Kim Jong Un meeting with military officials. Instead, a picture posted today showed Kim’s face with a pig-like snout and a drawing of Mickey Mouse on his chest.

Is North Korea really
looking to start a war?
Telegraph [UK], by Shashank Joshi    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/4/2013 3:47:13 PM     Post Reply
As the US and China grow increasingly involved, Kim Jong-un must be brought into line if war is not to be triggered by an act of recklessness. There are two schools of thought about what lies behind North Korea’s increasingly frenzied posturing. The first goes like this: the rhetoric emanating from Pyongyang--including calls to “break the waists of the crazy enemies [and] totally cut their windpipes”--is no worse than their decades-old ritualistic promises to turn South Korea into a “sea of fire”. What we are witnessing, according to this theory, is nothing more than an inexperienced leader



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Former British prime minister
Baroness Thatcher dies peacefully at the age
of 87 after suffering a massive stroke

70 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by James Nye    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/8/2013 8:55:39 AM     Post Reply
Margaret Thatcher, the first female British Prime Minister who gained worldwide renown as the Iron Lady has died aged 87. Developing a formidable partnership with President Ronald Reagan during the 1980s, Mrs. Thatcher stood up to the ´Evil Empire´ of the Soviet Union, eventually witnessing its collapse. [Snip] Responding to her death, Buckingham Palace said, ´The Queen is sad to hear the news of the death of Baroness Thatcher and Her Majesty will be sending a private message of sympathy to the family, Buckingham Palace said today.´ British Prime Minster David Cameron said on hearing of her passing, ´It was

McCain: ´I don´t understand´
GOP filibuster on guns

68 replie(s)
Politico, by Jennifer Epstein    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/7/2013 12:18:14 PM     Post Reply
Sen. John McCain says he doesn´t understand the threats from some of his Republican colleagues to filibuster a bill on background checks to buy guns. "I don´t understand it," the Arizona Republican said on Sunday of the threat coming from Sen. Rand Paul,Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen. Mike Lee and nine other Republicans. "The purpose of the United States Senate is to debate and to vote and to let the people know where we stand.” "What are we afraid of? ... If this issue is as important as we all think it is, why not take ... it up and debate?"

´My bangs are getting
a little irritating´: Michelle
Obama admits she already regrets
her high-maintenance hairdo

66 replie(s)
Daily Mail (UK), by Margot Peppers    Original Article
Posted By: pineledger- 4/7/2013 7:43:42 AM     Post Reply
Michelle Obama has admitted that she is already tired of the bangs she first sported in January. The First Lady said in an interview with Entertainment Tonight: ´Bangs are a day-by-day proposition. They´re starting to grow out, get a little irritating.´ Still, she hasn´t let her hairdo woes get her down. ´It´s okay,´ she said after her initial complaint. ´We´ll be good.´ The first indication that her hairstyle was becoming a burden came about last weekend, when Malia, 14, was spotted adjusting her mother´s hair during the White House Easter Egg Roll.

Kim Jong-un Wants Phone
Call from Obama - report

56 replie(s)
Korea Broadcast Service, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/8/2013 6:56:50 AM     Post Reply
North Korea’s young leader Kim Jong-un is waiting for United States President Barack Obama to make a phone call to Pyongyang to discuss easing tensions on the Korean peninsula, according to Russia’s news agency Itar-Tass. The report cited United Kingdom diplomats, saying Pyongyang was demanding the U.S. president personally call Kim Jong-un as one of the conditions to relieve the current conflict at hand. Itar-Tass also quoted the U.K.’s Sky News as saying North Korea currently has eight nuclear warheads.

Christians, here´s why we´re
losing our religion

54 replie(s)
Fox News, by Craig Groeschel    Original Article
Posted By: STLstudent- 4/7/2013 5:13:55 PM     Post Reply
Recent research indicates that the number of people who do not consider themselves a part of an organized religion is steadily on the rise. Interestingly enough, though the number of those religiously unaffiliated is increasing, there is little to no trend in the number of those who express atheist or agnostic beliefs. People aren’t saying they don’t believe in God. They’re saying they don’t believe in religion. They are not rejecting Christ. They are rejecting the church. This begs the question, “Why are we losing our religion?”

Broadcasters worry
about ´Zero TV´ homes

48 replie(s)
Associated Press, by Ryan Nakashima    Original Article
Posted By: Ribicon- 4/7/2013 2:43:40 PM     Post Reply
Los Angeles — Some people have had it with TV. They´ve had enough of the 100-plus channel universe. They don´t like timing their lives around network show schedules. They´re tired of $100-plus monthly bills. A growing number of them have stopped paying for cable and satellite TV service, and don´t even use an antenna to get free signals over the air. (Snip) Last month, the Nielsen Co. started labeling people in this group "Zero TV" households, because they fall outside the traditional definition of a TV home. There are 5 million of these residences in the U.S., up from

´Mickey Mouse Club´ star
Annette Funicello dies at 70

47 replie(s)
Los Angeles Times, by Dennis McLellan    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/8/2013 1:18:00 PM     Post Reply
Annette Funicello, the dark-haired darling of TV´s “The Mickey Mouse Club” in the 1950s who further cemented her status as a pop-culture icon in the ´60s by teaming with Frankie Avalon in a popular series of “beach” movies, died Monday. She was 70. Funicello, who was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis in 1987 and became a spokeswoman for treatment of the chronic, often-debilitating disease of the central nervous system, died at Mercy Southwest Hospital in Bakersfield, Walt Disney Co. spokesman Howard Green said. Funicello and her husband, Glen Holt, had moved from

Special ops veterans’ group
calls for select probe of
Benghazi attack

41 replie(s)
Fox News, by Catherine Herridge    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/8/2013 7:00:09 AM     Post Reply
More than 700 Special Operations veterans are urging members of Congress to back a select committee to investigate last year’s Benghazi terrorist attack, according to a letter first obtained by Fox News. The letter from the group, “Special Operations Speaks,” supports the appointment of a special committee tasked with the single mission of investigating the attack that left Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans dead, and shut down the CIA operation in an annex of the Benghazi consulate, in the Sept. 11, 2012 attack. “Congress must show some leadership and provide answers to the public

Chelsea Clinton doesn´t close
door to public office

41 replie(s)
USA Today, by Catalina Camia    Original Article
Posted By: jackson- 4/8/2013 10:23:20 AM     Post Reply
Chelsea Clinton has raised her profile in the last few days, which sparked the inevitable question about the former first daughter´s future: Will she ever be like Mom and Dad and run for office? Clinton, 33, essentially said "maybe" in an interview that aired Monday on NBC´s Today show. "Right now I´m grateful to live in a city, a state and a country where I strongly support my mayor, my governor, my president and my senators and my representative," said Clinton, whose father, Bill, was president from 1993-2001 and her mother, Hillary

The Secrets of Princeton
40 replie(s)
New York Times, by Ross Douthat    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 8:08:09 AM     Post Reply
Susan Patton, the Princeton alumna who became famous for her letter urging Ivy League women to use their college years to find a mate, has been denounced as a traitor to feminism, to coeducation, to the university ideal. But really she’s something much more interesting: a traitor to her class. Her betrayal consists of being gauche enough to acknowledge publicly a truth that everyone who’s come up through Ivy League culture knows intuitively —

Obama flying 11 relatives of Sandy Hook
victims to D.C. on Air Force One so
they can back gun control in person

39 replie(s)
Associated Press, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 4/8/2013 4:05:18 PM     Post Reply
President Barack Obama is bringing 11 relatives of those killed in the shooting at Connecticut´s Sandy Hook Elementary School to Washington on Air Force One on Monday so they can personally encourage senators to back gun legislation that faces tough opposition. A nonprofit organization that works with the families, Sandy Hook Promise, said that after Obama´s speech on gun control in Hartford, he is flying with relatives of seven children and one staffer killed during December´s massacre at the school. The White House says Obama is going to argue that lawmakers have an

Updated: White House, McCain
blast Cruz for threatening
filibuster over guns

38 replie(s)
Houston Chronicle, by Joanna Raines    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/8/2013 4:55:05 PM     Post Reply
There was growing buzz over the weekend that a bipartisan agreement on gun control — a deal that would expand background checks — could hit the floor as early as this week. However, any deal could be derailed by the looming threat of a Republican filibuster involving Texas Sen. Ted Cruz. With Cruz standing proudly in the way of any gun legislation, Democrats are trying to make him pay a political price — and even a couple of high-profile Republicans are questioning his tactics.


Post Reply   Close thread 714478





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS