Yep, right on tune with the morons in the Demoncrap party.

I´ll be happy when the liberal/progressive types are OFF the Court...

Good idea but we want women like Laura Ingraham not wizened shrews poisoned by Marxism.

..a typical Democrat sexist incompetent.

We need Judges with IQs above their age.

Well, right off he could appoint Sandra Fluke, Peace Mom, and Gloria Allred. Maybe one of the NOW hags.

She lies. What she REALLY means is she wants nine LIBERAL women on the court. She would never support even one conservative woman on the court.

The replacement for Ginsburg will most likely be King Hussein´s next supreme court pick. He´s gonna have a hard time finding another as clueless and anti-American as this dried up prune, but I´m sure he´ll come close.

How far we´ve fallen...

Isaiah 3:12

Childish leaders oppress my people, and women rule over them. O my people, your leaders mislead you; they send you down the wrong road.

Ecclesiastes 1:9

History merely repeats itself. It has all been done before. Nothing under the sun is truly new.


´nuff said

I´m a female, and sadly I know many many females who make decisions based on emotion, while men decide based on logic.
Imagine women who are menopausal, or have PMS having to agree on something!
Oh for the times when people were chosen based on their ability!

Here is my all-female Supreme Court dream team:

Ingraham, Palin, Parker, Malkin, Bachmann, King, Foxx, Kuhl, and as Chief Justice, Janice Rogers Brown.

Justice Ginsburg is female?

We need to retire justice Ginsburg. She even looks like and old shrew.

Would she be happy with 9 conservative women? I think what she really means are 9 liberals who are women.

The real scary part is that this "mind" has a key role in what this country will see as constitutional in the future. This comment together with her comments about not using our constitution as a model say so much about her thinking and how her decisions have nothing to do with the constitution and how they have to do with her liberal/socialist philosophy

Thank God all the justices who are feeble-minded and at death´s door are already as liberal as stupidity can conceive. How much worse damage could our Dumbass-in-Chief do? Another Sotomayor? (Snort!)

Sure, why not?

Libs hate diversity. Especially diversity in thought and belief. But, now, female only?

Nine Ginsburg´s, or worse yet, those last two morons? Even nine of the highly overrated Sandra Day O´Connor would have been a disaster.

Coulter should be in the mix. The liberal Senate would never approve her but the hearings would be sensational!

The premise being that all the females are liberals. The same is true for all blacks, all Hispanics, all homosexuals, all tribes of any nature. Would Ginsburg be happy with eight Margaret Thatchers? The liberals always get away with their sanctimonious BS.

Brings to mind the old academic limerick:

A tangled web indeed we weave
When Adam grants degrees to Eve.
For much I doubt, if Eve´d first had´em
That she´d have done as much for Adam.

This is one of the more balanced, well thought out words to come out of Ruthie´s mouth. She thinks it is a joke but coming from her it isn´t.

summation - she´s a racist! Man hater. sexist, small minded, opinated, politician, and not a fair minded judge.

character and the pledge to uphold the constitution or the citizens of this country is the not on her mind.

Only eight more prunes to go!

Sounds rather sexist to me! With that kind of thinking, should she even be on the USSC?

...no Ruthie, what you really want is 9 liberal black lesbian women on the SC, then no one could ever criticize them for anything!

Just what we need, a Supreme Court that looks and acts like The View.

How long before white men who vote Democrat realize that they are at the very bottom of the totem pole ?

Ginsburg is a bigot.

I saw the old bag on CSpan last weekend and she is really a mess - who selected her and why? Roberts and old ruthie can retire any time. Tired of them both and their ignorant decisions.

What we need, is for "Just-Us" Ginsberg to be OFF the Supreme Court.

Unfortunately, whoever replaces her will be equally as one-sided and bigoted so long as the Republicans will not effectively fillibuster EVERY nominee that Bronco Bama offers. There would be no effective change in most of the outcomes if only eight Justices were sitting on the Supreme Court bench.

But a hung court is almost as good as a win for those not of the "phony liberal" persuasion.

Female chauvinist sow.

Hi #12, sorry, we must have a black, not a Brown. You know, racism and such. and you have way too many lawyers on your list.

More "wisdom" from the former General Counsel of an organization partly founded, in 1920, by communists in New York City.......the ACLU.

If there is such a thing as a stupid/ugly pill...the justice here must be taking it in large quantities

Not a bad idea....at least it would be conservative every 28 days

This is good news. That means this woman will hang on to her bench seat with all her fingernails & Obama won´t be able to pick a new liberal moonbat to take her place!!

See how easy it is to keep hope alive? :-)

What a moron this broad is.

Her status as a terminal moron alone should have gotten her impeached and removed. Alas....

That she´s an America-hater, is contemptuous of the Constitution [were she honest on that account, she´d have resigned], and sexist [she clearly believes women are superior to men].

OK, Ruthie -- from now on, you´d better: refuse to fly with a male pilot; refuse help from male EMS techs; throw out all male-invented devices you use or own; travel on streets or in vehicles built primarily by men; find some gals to rip out the air conditioning in your home [can´t be honoring Willis Carrier, can we?]; no use of electricity [Franklin; Tesla; Edison; Westinghouse; etc.]; nothing made of steel [Andrew Carnegie]; can´t use paper [that might be awkward]; and so on.

Oh -- ditch your glasses. That evil male Benjamin Franklin, don´cha know.

I find it hard to believe the sexist B is even a Judge, but she´s Supreme Court Justice which proves how far down the path we are.

Here´s hoping she makes it another 4.1 years.

FEEELLLLINGS, nothing more than FEEELINGS. The reason a liberal appoints a female....so they can rule on their FEEEELINGS.

What, ...filling the United States Supreme Court with lefty/lib/statist dem-activist women lawyers?!! Now, THAT would indeed be one demanding, ´´special interest group,´´ eh? s/

...Somehow, that just doesn´t seem to be what the Founders had in mind regarding Constitutional, ´´equality,´´ for each individual American. (Are the dems drunk with power now or what? They are removing Lady Liberty´s blindfold! mmm mmm mmm)

Just when you thought we were entering an age of egalitarianism, an extreme leftist reveals their true intent, a future of revanchism based on gender, and most likely also race, ethnicity, orientation, etc.

The funny thing is, even if women occupied all of the highest positions in society, they would still expect to find a mate of higher status, which would be an ever-dwindling pool under those circumstances.

Bottom line, she should be impeached over this sexist comment if that is possible.

Gee, and just think that this senile, sexist old hag gets to determine what is constitutional in this country...

Darn, where are those NØbamacare death panels when you need one to put this senile old had out of our misery...

How utterly sexist of her.

Give me 9 Phylis Schlflys and I will agree to it.

What a stupid, sexist statement. Makes about as much sense as... oh, I dunno´....maybe a senile old lady?

So it´s been a total waste of time tolerating generations of emasculated American eunuchs, huh? At least there wouldn´t be a groundswell of opposition to Ginsburg´s dream.

So why isn´t all women as evil as all men? Do we need justices that blind to their own bias?

As a woman, I say not just NO, but heck NO.

Why does feminism presume everything is better without men involved? It offends my reason, and I resent prunes like Ginsburg presuming to speak for me.

Way to play to the stereo type, Ms. Ginsburg.

Pray that they all stay in good health for the next 4 years.

Excuse me?

Ruthie Buzzard needs to get on her alzheimer meds. She is losing her mind. Yeah, after 9 females, why not 9 blacks or 9 hispanics or 9 gays or 9 transgendereds or 9 empty heads!! I mean, nobody thinks it is strange to have 9 whites or 9 heterosexuals or 9 Gentiles, or 9 people with brains!!!

Wow, she is losing it quickly!!!!

Didn´t Mooch suggest that we needed an all-female submarine crew? At least no one would end up pregnant.

A Country Boy can survive...

The widest intellectual and competence chasm in American society today is the one separating liberal and conservative women. Even the "book smart" supposedly high IQ liberals tend to be reality-challenged dingbats who destroy every public and private sector institution they infest. Why is that?

Genitalia not Intelligence! The battle cry of the NAGS.

If the women were all conservative, I wonder if Ginsburg would feel the same way. I doubt it. Just goes to show that left-wing identity politics is fraught with contradictions.

No. What we need is a retirement age.

She looks like Larry King.

Seriously, isn´t this woman way beyond her shelf-life?

I heard a while back her giving either a speech or an interview. Her mind was gone. She was rambling incoherently, slurring her words, and forgetting the issue or question presented. It was embarrassing combination of pathetic and scary.

What she means is, homely, corrupt, angry females.

There is no fool like an old fool.

Ok.....but who will get the morning coffee then?

What if one of the male justices had said that we need an all-male Supreme Court? I´ll answer that: he would have been at least crucified by the media.