Well somebody did.

There needs to be a select committee to investigate this. Four Americans have been murdered, one a diplomat and nobody seems to know anything.

It´s very frustrating when the people who know who edited the talking points will lie with impunity. They believe the ends justify the means, therefore, they say whatever needs to be said in order to achieve the desired results. I feel like giving up. How can you have a meaningful inquiry into what actually happened with people who lie and cheat?

#1 is right. Don´t tell us what you didn´t do.

1) Was it scrubbed? Yes or no?

2) If so, who did it?

Based on what B.O. said the other day:

For them to go after the UN ambassador who had nothing to do with Benghazi, and was simply making a presentation based on intelligence that she had received, and to besmirch her reputation is outrageous," Obama said.

Since she had nothing to do with Benghazi, was appearing at the behest of the WH and was making a presentation on intelligence she received (from the WH) ... what and I to think?

PIAPS, what do you think about Obama´s war on women?

"That’s what our job is.... I can tell you that immediately upon finding out that our folks were in danger, that my orders to my National Security team were do whatever we need to do to make sure they’re safe." (President 0bama - 11/14/12).

This is what 0bama said at his ´´news conference.´´ It makes it clear to me that some, if not all the men were known to be alive [since the audio/video links were activated by various agencies]. One can only draw the conclusion that 0bama knew as events were taking place on 9/11.

It was a known terrorist attack from the moment it started till it sadly ended with our government, from the top on down, allowing for the murder of their "assets" in Benghazi. You´ll never scrub the blood off your hands.

I think Tom Donilon had a hand in its alteration to protect the Obama campaign. It as been his responsibility to keep any eruptions tamped down and under control.

See this New York Timea article from September 23, 2012, on that very subject:

A Manager of Overseas Crises, as Much as the World Permits
By PETER BAKER

An excerpt:

Mr. Donilon is the one who wakes the president when an ambassador is killed in Libya, the one who tries to keep Israel from rupturing relations and Egypt from heading off track. Solutions to intractable problems like Iran’s nuclear program are for another day. For now, it is Mr. Donilon’s mission to manage problems and keep them from blowing up, so Mr. Obama can focus on Mitt Romney rather than Benjamin Netanyahu

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/24/us/politics/tom-donilon-a-manager-of-overseas-crises.html?pagewanted=all

And to put the icing on the cake, his wife is Jill Biden´s chief of staff.

Then he must have known that his "order" was ignored when he flew out the next day/ OR,he did not give an order at all/ OR, he knew they were dead.

The WH first claims its because of video, is caught lying and changes its story, then that they didn´t know anything about the CIA talking points, is caught lying when the CIA says they were forwarded to them, then that they did not edit anything, and is caught lying and says they only changed a word. Really? I do think WH credibility has suffered a little here, and I think they are lying.

Where was Valerie Jarrett in this loop?

who did? President Jarrett in the library with a candlestick...

Who gave the CIA briefing to Congress 3 days after attack?

If a terrorist attack was given as the source of the attack, why did those attending the briefing come away with the belief that they were told it was due to a demonstration about a Youtube video?

The whole white House is a nest of vipers and Valerie Jarrett in the head snake.

Maybe Zippy´s dog ate it...

The incompetence and corruption of the entire Obama administration is appalling, almost bordering on criminal, if it is not already considering Benghazi. America can not endure four more years of this. All these people are out of their league, over their heads and not anywhere near performing close to their current pay grades. Somethings got to give.

Uh oh. This sounds ominous. Just in case there is anyone left whose attention isn´t focused on Susan Rice after Obama shined all the spotlights on her in his news conference, in answer to the question "who doctored the talking points," the White House just had everyone take one step backward. Everyone, that is, except Rice. She´s now standing front and center all alone. I hope she has hired counsel.

When you´re sitting at the poker table and can´t figure out who the mark is, it´s you, Sue.

Why is everyone getting upset over the "talking points?" They really don´t matter. Days after the killings, when they were certain that it was a terrorist attack, the President was still talking about the video! All this Susan Rice stuff is diverting attention from the fact that the President himself lied to us.

What´s to explain? What´s not to understand?

It was the inter-government agencies which messed up. You know the way it is with those inter-government agencies - - they´re always messing things up.

The Zippy administration is completely clean. They didn´t know anything - - so how could they have covered it up?

SHEESH! Let´s all get a life - - this is old, old news by now.

Damn inter-government agencies!

#17 ... good point. Why was the president using the same mis-information days and days later?

I just got a call from Harry Reid´s Anonymous Source: Bush did it.

They also denied:
* that it was a terrorist attack
* help from military sources
* that Amb. Stevens was killed (remember Hussein Obama claiming that Stevens was being helped to the hospital?)

They´ve been in full denial mode since day 1.

There has been much speculation that Susan Rice´s script came from Axelrod, who throughout the campaign was Obama´s primary spokesman on any and all sensitive issues, including Benghazi. The House Committees should quickly subpoena Axelrod and get him under oath -- as head of the campaign organization, Axelrod was and is a private citizen and thus outside of any executive or other governmental privileges Obama/Holder may try to assert to shield Axelrod.

Axelrod is also outside of Rhodes´ carefully worded denial of any changes by the White House or State.

Does anyone believe the CIA gave their ONLY copy to be reviewed by the other agencies? Of course not!

If they´re denying it, you know it´s true.