 A Message From Lucianne
Now More Than Ever Get Your Eagles Up! Lucianne Tees - in Black or White Click to Buy
|
|
Hey GOP, take the Palin cure
Los Angeles Times, by Charlotte Allen
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Vastrightwingconspirator, 11/17/2012 4:12:53 PM
|
| The Republican Party has been doing a lot of hand-wringing and finger-pointing since the presidential election. Half the conservative columnists and bloggers say the GOP lost because it overemphasized social issues such as abortion and gay marriage. The other half says the party didn´t emphasize them enough. And everyone denounces Project ORCA, the campaign´s attempt to turn out voters via technology. But I´ve got a suggestion for cutting short the GOP angst: Sarah Palin for president in 2016. You think I´m joking? Think again. In 2008, Palin, running as my party´s vice presidential
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
srhcb, 11/17/2012 4:23:18 PM (No. 9020984)
There!
Somebody finally said it.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
thebeez, 11/17/2012 4:24:40 PM (No. 9020985)
YES!! Please
|
| |
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
SheikYerBooty, 11/17/2012 4:32:33 PM (No. 9020994)
Three million fewer people voted for Romney than McCain. The liberal RINOs and the rest of the liberals have been selling the lie that McCain lost because of Sarah.
Romney and the weak-stick RINOs made a huge blunder by not allowing Sarah to speak at the convention.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
MissMann, 11/17/2012 4:34:58 PM (No. 9020996)
No. Just no.
I, too, only got interested in 2008 when she was selected, but it is time to stop the gimmicks and get serious about marketing what we believe makes America great to an electorate never taught it.
It can be done. I´m old enough to remember Atwater and Reagan doing it.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
TunnelRat, 11/17/2012 4:36:25 PM (No. 9020998)
"A national exit poll conducted by CNN asked voters whether Palin was a factor in their voting. Of those who said yes, 56% voted for McCain versus 43% for Barack Obama."
I thought it was gonna say: "56% voted for Sarah versus 43% for McCain"...
Romney eventually won my vote; he seems to be a decent man. However, I didn´t send much money and didn´t volunteer my time. Sorry, I simply had no response to him like I did with Sarah Barracuda.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Blue-Z-Anna, 11/17/2012 4:43:12 PM (No. 9021001)
When I am not John Gault I am Sarah Palin.
Will this require surgery ?
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Paleoconserv43, 11/17/2012 4:45:49 PM (No. 9021005)
No no a thousand times no! Mrs. Palin is nice lady, but clearly hasn´t the intelligence or experience for the presidency. Enough with this cult of personality! It´s ruining our country. We don´t need a conservative version of Our Dear Leader.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
eoddad, 11/17/2012 4:51:56 PM (No. 9021011)
#8 Sorry could not agree more. Intelligence who is getting elected because they are intelligent? Sarah at least believes in America and she is not part of the Establishment. It probably doesn´t matter with the media the courts and Obama rigging the system we have probably had our last election that isn´t like the ones held in the old Soviet Union.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Bubbasuncle, 11/17/2012 4:59:30 PM (No. 9021024)
Re: #8 Posting Dem talking points does not work in this Salon. Just how much actual experience did the Butcher have when he ran for office? The question of intelligence, well I would put Sarah up against him without a teleprompter anytime.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
saguni, 11/17/2012 5:10:18 PM (No. 9021031)
Sarah Palin is the new Ronald Reagan: charming and affable and unwilling to back down if she´s right. I can´t see what´s wrong with that.
I voted for Sarah Palin in spite of the fact she was on the ticket with that low-life self-serving, I-was-a-POW, John McCain. I was hoping for one of those "I need to spend more time with my family" health crisis to happen early in McCain´s administration.
I have had it up to here with wishy-washy, milque-toast, moderate, I´ll-give-away-the-farm Republican weenies.
I would hope that the Sarah Palins and the Tea Partiers form a new party...Constitutionists...soon and they would take the next election---if 0bama hasn´t declared himself dictator-for-life and cancelled all future elections.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
chillijilli, 11/17/2012 5:11:04 PM (No. 9021033)
Divided we fall. The single admirable thing the Demos know how to do is stay UNITED on the public front. Their policy disagreements are always kept behind closed doors. How could we ask anyone to vote with us, when we don´t even know what we stand for? Don´t you wonder why the LATimes is dangling Sarah out there for the GOP right now? Some of you whine and moan about the media and then take their bait as soon as it´s offered up. The Demos smell blood and want us to destroy ourselves. I was a mega Sarah supporter, but got fed up quickly with her over-the-top coyness re: this election. She wanted to drag out the primaries as long as possible, and I wonder *why* . Is it possible that Sarah is in it ONLY for *Sarah*--- and she would rather have this country face 4 more years of BHO than give Mitt her support?
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
chumley, 11/17/2012 5:15:12 PM (No. 9021039)
Thank you for a Sarah article. I have missed them. Sadly, it will never work. She has integrity, intellect, intuition and vision. She cannot be bought, rented or bullied. The republican establishment will never stand for that. As a matter of fact, they didnt. Funny how a Saturday Night Live characterization, wrong at the time, still hangs on. Too bad they didnt go after the Kenyan with such vigor.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
steelbreeze, 11/17/2012 5:28:05 PM (No. 9021058)
To all you snottie dolts that call yourself conservatives and put down Governor Palin at every turn I TOLD YOU SO.Just look what we have now.A skinny-armed commie loving little girl as President again who if there is any justice will be impeached.Now isn´t that just grand?
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
red oak, 11/17/2012 5:29:24 PM (No. 9021060)
I love Sarah and I don´t ever want to be cured of it.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
BigGeorgeTX, 11/17/2012 5:40:08 PM (No. 9021072)
It´s become painfully obvious that there are two types of posters here. Those that are truly conservative, and those that whose foremost intent is to promote the Republican brand.
I´ve made the decision to disengage from political obsession and the stress that accompanies it. I´ll continue to vote against the creeping communism in this country, but I´ll no longer support weak sauce candidates who won´t take a stand for what´s right. Election fraud is rampant, and neither party seems to want to fix it. Once the illegals are granted citizenship that, combined with the Marxist takeover of education and the media as well as the future takeover of the Supreme Court, will seal the fate of conservatism in this nation. Hopefully the 20 or so years of life I have left will end before that occurs.
Ronald Reagan was the last unashamedly conservative candidate to run, and he achieved two landslide victories. Since then, the elites in the Republican party have pushed it ever further to the left in each successive election, still falling short. Until there is a fracturing off of a truly conservative party, we will always have a leftist at the helm and the Marxists will have won.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
beth, 11/17/2012 5:44:19 PM (No. 9021078)
The reason I would vote for Sarah is that I trust her on the issues. That is the most important requirement. As far as intellect and experience, she had more of both than did the Democrat candidate in 2008. And he hasn´t gotten any better.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
JoElla Bee, 11/17/2012 5:48:11 PM (No. 9021085)
#12, Palin supported Romney with $5,000 to his campaign. She was roundly and sarcastically maligned for it here, btw. So, it appears she´s damned if she does, and damned if she doesn´t in the minds of some.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Fiesta del sol, 11/17/2012 5:56:01 PM (No. 9021092)
The people who trashed Sarah Palin are the same people running this country. The Establishment. The Harvard/Princeton elites who think that the crease in a man´s pants indicates if he´ll be a good leader. The Eastablishment all talk to each other have driven this country into the ground. The all go on Morning Joe and derisively snicker every time her name comes up. At least she´s not one of them.
She made her own way in this world, and went to a (gasp) state school. I´m even more impressed with her b/ c she didn´t go to an elite school. I fear that the axis of evil in DC/NY has ruined her chances, but I would sure like to try somebody fresh and new, not one of them.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
Boneshaker, 11/17/2012 6:26:50 PM (No. 9021125)
Re: #8
I disagree with the assertion that Sarah doesn´t have the intelligence or experience to serve as president.
Especially in light of the fact that Obama, who had much less experience and is demonstrably less intelligent, has been elected twice.
Sarah qualifies for the job in her own right, but if Obama is the new standard that sets the bar pretty low for others who may seek the presidency. .
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
TickleTheDragon, 11/17/2012 6:31:44 PM (No. 9021131)
Please don’t doubt I am a Conservative, and fairly reasonable and down-to-earth. And I am sick to death of Sarah Palin and her whiney voice and practiced comments. She and other self-serving egotists like Newt Gingrich should just focus on things like writing diet books and Dancing with the Stars...p l e a s e.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
Coy860, 11/17/2012 6:34:20 PM (No. 9021134)
Sarah Palin was a heckofa better Governor than Romney ever was. Honestly look at her record while Governor. She didn´t allow anyone to push her around, democrat or Republican. She put Alaska first and they were the winners. She sure understands the OIL industry.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
dman, 11/17/2012 6:36:17 PM (No. 9021136)
As illustrated by above posters, the GOP is split on this. Sarah simply will not play ball with the party Establishment.
If you want someone like Sarah, Allen West, or even Marco Rubio, your only option is to form a new party. That´s my choice. Tough in the short run, workable in the long run. We must rid ourselves of the global corporatists, Wall Streeters, and country clubbers and the ´party of the rich´ albatross that goes with them. They control the GOP; we need a party of our own.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
Grant Hodges, 11/17/2012 6:40:54 PM (No. 9021140)
I am tired of people talking about Palin and intelligence. Are you trying to tell me BO is smart? Not at all. Just evil.
Romney? In the debates? Sorry. It was just that BO was so dumb that it made Romney look smart. I am so tired of the DC and media establishment trotting out their latest lackeys and telling us they are smart.
And another thing: wrongheadedness with intelligence is worse than lackluster intellect. That´s what we have for a political establishment right now.
Proof? Who is worrying about the guy they put in jail for Barack´s video? Who among our elite has noticed that Hillary put a man in jail to buttress a campaign slogan that Al Qaeda is dead?
Where is Bobbie Jindal, Romney, Cantor, or the rest of those lackluster morons on the constitutionality of leaving that Bassiley guy in prison now that the Democrats are admitting they lied about him?
One word for them all: morons.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
sickened, 11/17/2012 6:41:42 PM (No. 9021141)
The GOP had better put up a Tea Party candidate in 2016, or the official Tea Party will put one up instead (to run against the Republican). I vote for Rand Paul if he learns to smile more by then.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
St. Pitbull, 11/17/2012 6:42:14 PM (No. 9021143)
I love Sarah but believe there are 2 problems:
1. Core demographics are moving against the R´s. Romney was right about the 47% (although his percentages were off somewhat)
2. Voting fraud is epidemic. Blame W on this. He had 8 years to do something and he knew that something needed to be done but he did nothing. Even given #1, the R´s should have been able to win the next 2 national elections had election fraud been curtailed.
3. R´s eat their own if there isn´t perfect agreement on every issue. Too many will sit at home, not vote and pout because the Republican candidate doesn´t have the same exact stance they demand. Then we have the media that is only too happy to continue to harp on that stance.
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
sickened, 11/17/2012 6:47:11 PM (No. 9021147)
Her entry certainly would keep many others out of the race.
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
batchief, 11/17/2012 6:54:31 PM (No. 9021158)
I am 68 and I have told friends I will never vote again because not a single contested race I voted in produced a winner. I feel my idea of who should lead my state and country is no longer who the majority of voters think should. Having said that, I would come out of political retirement and vote for Sarah Palin.
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
Pat26.2, 11/17/2012 6:55:10 PM (No. 9021159)
Sarah was set to run for 2012 - you only have to read her Indianola speech on Sept 3rd, 2011, to see that she had a platform and was ready to run a populist campaign.
http://www.sarahpac.com/posts/governor-palins-speech-at-the-restoring-america-tea-party-of-america-rally-in-indianola-iowa-video-and-transcript
For whatever reason, and I think it was likely strong GOP establishment opposition, she didn´t pull the trigger. So, she endorsed down-ticket and stayed out of the lime-light while the GOP establishment "electable" candidate lost, again. Running as Democrat-lite DOES NOT work.
Romney did not deliver the ground game, despite late-breaking Tea Party support. The Orca disaster cast severe doubts on his much vaulted executive skills.
Read this, and weep:
http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/11/when-the-nerds-go-marching-in/265325/
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
JoniTx, 11/17/2012 7:08:24 PM (No. 9021166)
This is a great article! Thanks for posting.
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
Yephora, 11/17/2012 7:38:50 PM (No. 9021195)
And Todd would make a GREAT First Husband!
(Think Scott Brown without the disappointment).
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
Aria, 11/17/2012 7:47:28 PM (No. 9021201)
Has anyone suggested that if Orca had worked that we´d have won? The rats have got cheating down to a science and they´re so entrenched in the system that they´re next to impossible to dislodge. Add to that our circular firing squad. 3m people stayed home?? I hope they have a guilty conscience every day of the next 4 years.
W did contribute to current problems with his lack of action regarding cleaning up the system. Plus he left us bare since he didn´t have a VP who could take over.
Sarah - I love her and if she runs I´ll vote for her. She is the epitome of what made us into a great country. Maybe the next 4 years will be bad enough that people will realize that we need her and her ideas. My fear is that the corrupt who run D.C., Republicans included, didn´t want her messing with their gravy trains and that is the reason the RNC shut her down. And now the same loser doofus wants to be chairman of the RNC again? They don´t call us the stupid party for nothing.
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
ravenhaven, 11/17/2012 7:48:58 PM (No. 9021203)
I´ll work my heart out for you. Just say the word, Sarah.
|
Reply 34 - Posted by:
maitaisoo, 11/17/2012 8:00:09 PM (No. 9021210)
Me too but you gotta declare early. Battlefield prep for a POTUS election takes years.
|
Reply 35 - Posted by:
Penney, 11/17/2012 8:29:43 PM (No. 9021228)
She has our votes, (2), whenever she might choose to run.
Character STILL counts! (-Washington D.C. sure needs some!)
|
Reply 36 - Posted by:
King of all trolls, 11/17/2012 8:42:10 PM (No. 9021237)
Palin/ Goldwater 2016! At this point we Might as well.
|
Reply 37 - Posted by:
Sherlock, 11/17/2012 9:06:07 PM (No. 9021254)
...at least Sarah Palin would have wiped the floor with that scrawny SOB! ..at least we would have had THAT much. I`m totally sick of the mealy mouth so-called good guys.take-em and shove-em.
|
Reply 38 - Posted by:
qr4j, 11/17/2012 9:47:24 PM (No. 9021271)
I will always love Sarah Palin and her family. Were she the nominee for POTUS, I´d be all-in for her. I think she is more than smart enough to be president. Compared to Obama--ivy league degrees and all--she´s WAY smarter. She knows all about small business. She knows what it means to live on a budget. She knows that a strong America means a peaceful world.
In this case, Palin and principle before party--and I am considered a "hard R" by the GOP. I´ve never voted Democrat in my life in a partisan election and I vote every election.
God bless Mrs. Palin. I know she will seek to do what God leads her to do. I trust her--would crawl on hands and knees over broken glass to cast my vote for her.
|
Reply 39 - Posted by:
harper, 11/17/2012 9:56:25 PM (No. 9021276)
So far, Sarah´s time in the spotlight has been similar to...Churchill´s. Laughed at, derided, scolded by the know-alls and dumped.
bac then, when all else was lost to the incompetent Gods of appeasement, when all the trendy left dimwits had done their worst and it was past the eleventh hour, Churchill reappeared as the only effective weapon the Brits had.
Do we, like the 1930s Brits, have to throw everything away, to descend below the level of our foes before someone like her is allowed to lead...?
|
Reply 40 - Posted by:
Me?Opinionated?Nah!, 11/17/2012 9:59:13 PM (No. 9021277)
Pinch me so I’ll know I’m not dreaming!
A non-hit piece about as non as non can be about Sarah Palin, and in the L.A. Times, no less. Charlotte Allen, where’ve you been all my life? Kudos to you for this exceptionally savvy, most refreshingly candid column! (If Bravo becomes Brava for females, likewise why doesn’t Kudo become Kuda? But, I digress.)
Sarah Palin has weathered probably a record-setting ammo dump of slings, arrows and so much more in the way of cheap, flimsy, gratuitous criticism for well over four years. She’s withstood it all with a well-earned measure of depth, far-reaching life experience, self-confidence, grace and good-natured humor. She’s the real deal, possessing all the right stuff necessary to be a strong, qualified, dedicated American President. Ronald Reagan in heels or a dress? Not quite. But, pretty darn close.
|
Reply 41 - Posted by:
dman, 11/17/2012 10:00:35 PM (No. 9021279)
#26, I share your feelings, but there is no "Tea Party". There are numerous, disjointed, disparate Tea Parties. Add in Libertarian, Constitutional, 10th Amendment, and a few others, and therein lies the problem. Conservatives, we must get our acts together and coalesce.
|
Reply 42 - Posted by:
ohioTom, 11/17/2012 10:20:06 PM (No. 9021298)
When it comes to Sarah Palin, I´m all in! Seriously!
|
Reply 43 - Posted by:
Little Peep, 11/17/2012 10:53:38 PM (No. 9021318)
I absolutely agree with the writer
|
Reply 44 - Posted by:
MHR, 11/17/2012 11:10:56 PM (No. 9021329)
No, no and no
|
Reply 45 - Posted by:
annie xango, 11/17/2012 11:22:36 PM (No. 9021339)
I, Sarah Heath Palin, do solemnly swear..someday I will hear those words...
|
Reply 46 - Posted by:
FormerDem, 11/17/2012 11:32:05 PM (No. 9021352)
She would do a wonderful job. She would know how to win back Latinos. She is from a union household, an ethnically mixed household, a household where they had to struggle to manage things, a household with the typical range of people issues. She´s straight with us, and oh how I like her.
|
Reply 47 - Posted by:
redink, 11/18/2012 12:25:14 AM (No. 9021400)
Sarah wanted the GOP primaries to last longer so the establishment wouldn´t have such a stranglehold on the outcome. She´s a real believer in the power of the republic. She wants the people in charge and conservative ideas to be the agent of real reform. I´ve admired her from the beginning and will continue to. I don´t see Romney getting the attention, even in defeat, that Sarah still gets. I still have some hope that all isn´t lost when I factor this in.
|
Reply 48 - Posted by:
plumnellie, 11/18/2012 7:47:51 AM (No. 9021591)
Where are all the Romney backers who trashed Palin with a frenzy just like that of the Dems? Oh I see several of them are still hanging around trying to help destroy our country. Pitiful how badly some people want to see our country sink. They would rather have Obama than Palin. It is a sick thing and there is only one cure. Several of the usual Palin haters are missing. Maybe Romney´s defeat has dampened their strident bashing for a while. But they will be back. They will promote some other Rove type candidate to lose in ´16. Is sick sick sick how little some people understand what a true patriot looks like. Or maybe they just hate a woman candidate.
|
Reply 49 - Posted by:
Avogadra, 11/19/2012 9:26:53 AM (No. 9023412)
To those who disparage Sarah Palin´s intelligence, I have four words:
Barack Obama Joe Biden
|
Reply 50 - Posted by:
northeast, 11/19/2012 10:52:11 AM (No. 9023550)
3rd party? We have one already it is called stay at home party.
|
Reply 51 - Posted by:
tisHimself, 11/19/2012 11:13:59 AM (No. 9023574)
The most vocal and consistent attackers of Palin in this salon were some of the most vocal and ardent, reflexive and aggressive Romney enthusiasts. All ten of ya. You had your opportunity and drove that bus off the cliff. Acknowledge and own it. The professional republican class has no idea what wins, but darned if they are going to relinquish control or admit their own ignorance. Pass the free shrimp and see if the black turtleneck is back from the dry cleaners.
|
Reply 52 - Posted by:
msjena, 11/19/2012 11:40:42 AM (No. 9023625)
I fear that Sarah´s "brand" has been too damaged by Alinsky-ite tactics by the Democrats and Republican "haters." But she has time now to try to repair the damage. I have some suggestions, which are superficial, but that I think need to be done. I think Sarah has fallen into the Hillary Clinton trap with changing hairstyles, glasses and clothes. She needs to pick a conservative style--meaning no hairpieces, hair extensions or obvious highlighting, overly casual dress, workout clothes in public, tight tee-shirts, etc. Her looks should not be an issue, other than to see that she is an attractive, but professional-looking, woman. She also needs to rein in her family. If she can´t get them all on board and rowing in the same direction, she should not run. No more reality TV for any of them. And she should start giving more speeches at serious venues on serious subjects, using serious language. She is a very good and very engaging speaker, but her use of phrases like "lamestream media," that we use and like, but are probably off-putting to some. Having said all this, if Sarah runs, I´m in.
|
Reply 53 - Posted by:
hoosiergirl71, 11/19/2012 12:00:22 PM (No. 9023675)
Before ya´ll get in a twist about who to run, you must find a way to "true" elections! The democrats will continue to steal them as they just did, this time adding software to machines that kicked out Romney votes, in addition to the tried and true methods. (Like finding votes in a warehouse recently in the West recount in FL) By the way, I´d vote for Sarah in a heart beat
|
Reply 54 - Posted by:
Susannah, 11/19/2012 12:03:28 PM (No. 9023686)
Come on, this article is a spoof. Look at Allen´s list of reasons why Palin should run:
1. Her teenaged daughter got pregnant out of wedlock, so all single moms will flock to her.
2. She has "an impressive gay fanboy" base, one of whom can manage her campaign.
3. She´s a perfect guest for "The View."
4. She´s cuter than Hillary.
5. She appeals to low-information voters who are driven by their emotions.
6. She has a son in the military. So does Biden.
Come on. Spoof.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Vastrightwingconspirator"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Vastrightwingconspirator"
|
Sarah Palin PAC goes on the march to reignite the right
|
|
Washington Times, by Cheryl K. Chumley
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Vastrightwingconspirator- 3/28/2013 12:26:16 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, the 2008 Republican vice presidential candidate, is gearing up for 2014. Her SarahPAC came out with a video on Wednesday aimed at fueling the conservative fires for a dramatic comeback in the midterm elections. The “Loaded for Bear” video features tea party favorite Sen. Ted Cruz talking of Mrs. Palin’s successes in the 2010 election that saw the rise of Sens. Marco Rubio, Rand Paul and Jeff Flake, Breitbart reports. “Sarah Palin picks winners,” Mr. Cruz says in the video. And the statement does hold truth. Former Sen. Jim DeMint,
|
Palin mocks Obama and Rove in CPAC speech
|
|
USA Today, by Paul Singer
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Vastrightwingconspirator- 3/16/2013 4:12:35 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Former GOP vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin mocked President Obama, GOP consultant Karl Rove and the mainstream media in a folksy speech to a gathering of conservative activists outside Washington Saturday. During her address to the Conservative Political Action Conference, or CPAC, Palin accused Obama of failing to lead, instead maintaining a permanent campaign approach of demonizing the opposition. True leadership, she said, means "ending the poisonous practice of treating members of different social, ethnic and religious groups as different electorates, pandered to with different promises."
|
|
Karl Rove: The biggest loser
|
|
The Hill [Washington, DC], by Jenny Beth Martin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Vastrightwingconspirator- 2/7/2013 4:30:57 PM
Post Reply
|
|
While Barack Obama is busy shredding the Constitution, Washington, D.C. insider Karl Rove is busy trying to destroy what is left of the Republican Party by launching a multi-million dollar Super PAC to usurp representative democracy, disenfranchise American voters, and concentrate even more power in Washington DC. Rove and the professional “consultant class” think that only Washington D.C. insiders like them – not the American people – should get to decide who runs for public office. That’s why he is launching the “Conservative Victory Project” – a Super PAC whose mandate is
|
|
Palin Should ´Preach to the Choir
|
|
American Thinker, by Ann Kane
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Vastrightwingconspirator- 1/29/2013 12:41:23 PM
Post Reply
|
|
In Sarah Palin´s interview with Stephen Bannon, the documentarian who chronicled her life in The Undefeated, she speaks forthrightly about her future plans now that she´s no longer tethered to a progressively moderate Fox News. But the meaning behind her words isn´t so clear. Short term: I encourage others to step out in faith, jump out of the comfort zone, and broaden our reach as believers in American exceptionalism. That means broadening our audience. I´m taking my own advice here as I free up opportunities to share more broadly the message of the beauty of freedom
|
EPA Email Scandal Is Worse Than Originally Thought
|
|
Breitbart's Big Government, by George Landrith & Peter Roff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: vastrightwingconspirator- 1/27/2013 9:59:49 PM
Post Reply
|
|
President Barack Obama and, for that matter, most of America seem woefully ignorant about a scandal unfolding at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. As hard as it is to believe, outgoing Administrator Lisa Jackson actually appears to have had agency personnel create a fictitious employee by the name of “Richard Windsor” so that Jackson could appropriate the Windsor’s email address for her own purposes. We’re not talking about some alias to be used for personal correspondence but a totally false identity in whose name official business was allegedly conducted created specifically to
|
Feinstein Flashback: ´I Understand The Urge To Arm Yourself... That´s What I Did´
|
|
Breitbart Big Government, by Awr Hawkins
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Vastrightwingconspirator- 1/25/2013 4:30:04 PM
Post Reply
|
|
In 1995, Sen. Diane Feinstein (D-CA) went on the record about the fact that she had a concealed carry permit and carried a concealed handgun when she walked back and forth to the hospital to see her ailing husband. She was also dealing with threats from a terror group, the World Liberation Front. The group had tried to bomb her house on one occasion and had shot out her windows on another. Reflecting on those moments, Feinstein said: I know the sense of helplessness that people feel, I know the urge to arm yourself, because that´s what I did.
|
|
Colin Powell: Latent Democrat?
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Gregory Kane
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Vastrightwingconspirator- 1/23/2013 11:58:28 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Recently the former secretary of state -- rumored to be a Republican -- has been quite vocal in criticizing his own political party. In no way am I saying Republicans are above criticism and do everything right. But there´s something about Colin Powell´s recent attacks that sound so, so, well, so Democratic National Committee-ish. Take, for instance, this gem: "There is a dark vein of intolerance in this party. They still sort of look down on the minority." Sounds ominous, no? And it sounds like the refrain we heard from Democrats throughout the 2012 presidential campaign
|
Ben Shapiro: ‘NBC News is a disaster area, an unholstered weapon for the left
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jamie Weinstein
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Vastrightwingconspirator- 1/23/2013 12:46:27 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Conservative commentator Ben Shapiro says in a new book that conservatives are getting bullied by the liberals — even by mild-mannered NBC news anchor Brian Williams. “Brian Williams is an excellent example of how the media bullies the right,” said Shapiro, author of the new book ”Bullies: How the Left’s Culture of Fear and Intimidation Silences Americans,” in an email. “He claims objectivity, but he’s obviously a leftist. I don’t mind bias – I’m biased. But I don’t lie about it. He sits atop NBC News, then allows his news outlet to slander George Zimmerman as a ‘white’ guy
|
Sarah Palin hits pols, media on Newtown
|
|
Politico, by Kevin Robillard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Vastrightwingconspirator- 12/18/2012 1:55:25 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin — who was harshly criticized for her response to the January 2011 mass shooting in Tucson, Ariz. — is telling Americans in the wake of Newtown to put their faith in God and ignore political and media “elites.” “First, all truly is hopeless if your faith and hope are put in any politician or media elite,” the Fox News contributor wrote on Facebook on Monday night. “That is because the average person is more truthful and responsible than the average politician or media elite. Those who let themselves be terribly disappointed in political leaders
|
|
DeMint takes parting shot at Boehner
|
|
The Hill, by Jonathan Easley
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: vastrightwingconspirator- 12/6/2012 11:50:16 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.), who shocked Washington on Thursday with the announcement that he would resign his Senate seat in January to become president of the the Heritage Foundation, sent a parting shot at Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) over the “fiscal cliff” negotiations. “I’m not with Boehner,” DeMint said on CNN’s "The Situation Room." “This government doesn’t need any more money, this country needs less government.” (Snip) “Speaker Boehner’s $800 billion tax hike will destroy American jobs and allow politicians in Washington to spend even more, while not reducing our $16 trillion debt by a single penny,”
|
Palin apologizes for calling some Republicans ‘wusses’
|
|
CNN, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Vastrightwingconspirator- 12/4/2012 11:17:41 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin apologized Monday night for describing some Congressional Republicans as “wusses” who are being “wobbly” on conservative principles in the fiscal cliff debate. “Well I guess I shouldn’t call politicians names, so I apologize for calling the wobbly ones wusses,” Palin said on Fox News. (Snip) “The point is that we are a bankrupt country,” she added. “There isn’t enough money in the world to pay back the future generations that we have stolen from and foreign countries that we have borrowed from and, through quantitative easing,
|
|
NRSC Prepares To Interfere In Primaries
|
|
Breitbart's Big Government, by Ben Shapiro
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: vastrightwingconspirator- 11/25/2012 11:51:31 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The National Republican Senatorial Committee had a rotten track record in 2012. But now they’re looking to get more deeply involved in picking candidates at the state level, hoping to foreclose Tea Party primary challengers like Richard Mourdock (R-IN). “There’s always going to be fundamental dislike of the national party coming to a local or a state race and saying, ‘This is who we want to pick,” Keli Carender of Tea Party Patriots told The Hill. The NRSC pulled out of several races this cycle, dooming several candidates to less-than-full financial support. The battle for the Republican Party heart
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
´My bangs are getting a little irritating´: Michelle Obama admits she already regrets her high-maintenance hairdo
|
|
Daily Mail (UK), by Margot Peppers
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: pineledger- 4/7/2013 7:43:42 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Michelle Obama has admitted that she is already tired of the bangs she first sported in January. The First Lady said in an interview with Entertainment Tonight: ´Bangs are a day-by-day proposition. They´re starting to grow out, get a little irritating.´ Still, she hasn´t let her hairdo woes get her down. ´It´s okay,´ she said after her initial complaint. ´We´ll be good.´ The first indication that her hairstyle was becoming a burden came about last weekend, when Malia, 14, was spotted adjusting her mother´s hair during the White House Easter Egg Roll.
|
McCain: ´I don´t understand´ GOP filibuster on guns
|
|
Politico, by Jennifer Epstein
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/7/2013 12:18:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Sen. John McCain says he doesn´t understand the threats from some of his Republican colleagues to filibuster a bill on background checks to buy guns. "I don´t understand it," the Arizona Republican said on Sunday of the threat coming from Sen. Rand Paul,Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen. Mike Lee and nine other Republicans. "The purpose of the United States Senate is to debate and to vote and to let the people know where we stand.” "What are we afraid of? ... If this issue is as important as we all think it is, why not take ... it up and debate?"
|
Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney General´ Comment Was a Gaffe
|
|
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that
|
Christians, here´s why we´re losing our religion
|
|
Fox News, by Craig Groeschel
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: STLstudent- 4/7/2013 5:13:55 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Recent research indicates that the number of people who do not consider themselves a part of an organized religion is steadily on the rise. Interestingly enough, though the number of those religiously unaffiliated is increasing, there is little to no trend in the number of those who express atheist or agnostic beliefs. People aren’t saying they don’t believe in God. They’re saying they don’t believe in religion. They are not rejecting Christ. They are rejecting the church. This begs the question, “Why are we losing our religion?”
|
Broadcasters worry about ´Zero TV´ homes
|
|
Associated Press, by Ryan Nakashima
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Ribicon- 4/7/2013 2:43:40 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Los Angeles — Some people have had it with TV. They´ve had enough of the 100-plus channel universe. They don´t like timing their lives around network show schedules. They´re tired of $100-plus monthly bills. A growing number of them have stopped paying for cable and satellite TV service, and don´t even use an antenna to get free signals over the air. (Snip) Last month, the Nielsen Co. started labeling people in this group "Zero TV" households, because they fall outside the traditional definition of a TV home. There are 5 million of these residences in the U.S., up from
|
Mother Of Slain Benghazi Officer To Sean Hannity: ‘They Want Me To Shut Up’
|
|
Mediaite, by A.J. Delgado
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:00:16 AM
Post Reply
|
|
On Friday, Sean Hannity brought Pat Smith, mother of the late Sean Smith, on his radio program. The 34-year-old information management officer was one of four Americans murdered in the Benghazi embassy attack on September 11, 2012. In the chilling interview, a distraught Ms. Smith, in tears, pleaded for answers and spoke of the efforts to silence her. Ms. Smith first relayed how her son, prior to the attack, requested additional security in advance and warned the State Department: He did tell them, ahead of time, he typed it into his little typewriter over there,
|
Vanishing workforce weighs on growth
|
|
Washington Post, by Jim Tankersley
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:28:59 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Put out an all-points bulletin: Millions of Americans have gone missing from the workforce. Every month that those would-be workers are gone raises the odds that they might never come back, dimming the prospects for future economic growth. The vanishing trend is more than a decade old, but it accelerated during the Great Recession. Throughout 2012, economists held out hope that it had stopped. But then came Friday’s jobs report, and hopes were dashed. The Labor Department reported that the U.S. labor force — everyone who has a job or is looking for one — shrank
|
Obama critic apologizes for his ´poorly chosen words´ on gay marriage
|
|
The Hill [Washington DC], by Alexandra Jaffe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/6/2013 12:18:19 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson, considered by some to be a potential Republican contender for president, apologized to Johns Hopkins University for the "poorly chosen words" he used in expressing his opposition to gay marriage last month.“I am sorry for any embarrassment this has caused,” Carson said in the letter, reported in New York Magazine.(Snip) "Although I do believe marriage is between a man and a woman, there are much less offensive ways to make that point. I hope all will look at a lifetime of service over some poorly chosen words.” Carson will remain as commencement speaker at Johns Hopkins,
|
The Secrets of Princeton
|
|
New York Times, by Ross Douthat
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 8:08:09 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Susan Patton, the Princeton alumna who became famous for her letter urging Ivy League women to use their college years to find a mate, has been denounced as a traitor to feminism, to coeducation, to the university ideal. But really she’s something much more interesting: a traitor to her class. Her betrayal consists of being gauche enough to acknowledge publicly a truth that everyone who’s come up through Ivy League culture knows intuitively —
|
Is going gluten-free healthier for everybody?
|
|
The Week, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: NorthernDog- 4/7/2013 11:28:27 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Gluten-free diets are all the rage, but they can be dangerous if not done right. What is gluten? It´s the spongy complex of proteins, found naturally in wheat, rye, and barley, that gives elasticity to dough and allows it to rise. When flour is moistened and either kneaded or mixed into dough, gluten molecules form an elastic, microscopic latticework that traps the carbon dioxide produced when yeast ferments, causing dough to inflate like a hot air balloon. Baking hardens the gluten, which helps the finished product keep its shape. Wheat — and gluten — is ubiquitous in the American diet.
|
Beyonce, Jay-Z celebrate 5th anniversary in Havana, Cuba
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Nardine Saad
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 4/6/2013 8:20:04 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Beyonce and Jay-Z celebrated their fifth wedding anniversary in Cuba this week. The couple, who married on April 4, 2008, took in the sights of Old Havana, visited a school, dined on a rooftop terrace and strolled the fan-filled streets in their island best.(snip).The power couple declined to answer journalists´ questions about their visit to the island nation, but some outlets are reporting that the moguls are there as tourists, though that would be illegal because of the half-century embargo the U.S. has on the Communist country. However, the Miami Herald said Washington has issued special licenses for
|
|

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
FS
|
|