Axlerod

The CIA would have retained a copy of the original. Just ask them.

She didn´t know she was lying? Sorry, not buying. They had to coordinate to get the story straight beforehand. Besides which , she has a responsibility to ensure she is telling the truth if she is going to go on 5 Sunday shows.

Obama already told us where her talking points came from; Zippy himself, or the White House staff at his or Valerie´s direction.

I smell Jarrett, and it´s no bouquet of roses.

any detective from any police force from podunk to new york city would have this "riddle" solved inside of two days. these intel people however can´t? put me down with the secessionists. we can´t count on the maroons in washington to protect us from anything

I expect that they are looking for a way to blame George Bush.

Interesting wording in that headline:

"Intel officials unable to say" instead of "Intel officials don´t know"

"Unable to say" ?

...spit.

´said they did not know who changed the talking points´

What is it with these people. Do they have to lie about everything? You can bet they know who changed it and why.

"But honey! I thought you would never find out-that´s why I lied."

My vote is that the guilty party is Tom Donlin, the NSC director. Bob Gates thought he was the source of the Bin Ladin leaks to the NY Times last year and told him to shut the f___ up about classified matters to the press.

My vote goes to the real CinC ValJar.

Doesn´t this crack Intell bunch make you feel really, really safe? (s/o)

Good one, #5.

Yes, interesting manipulation of words, #8.

With a NID, named Clapper, we just knew there´d be trouble.

I´m still trying to find out who promoted Peress.

Has anyone ever figured that one out?

"Inter-agency process" aka Axelrod/Jarrett

There cant be many on the food chain that can change orders for CIA... Denial and plausible deniability cant equal innocence...

An American Ambassador was killed... And it was viewed in real time. Impeach

Seriously the Central "Intelligence" Agency cannot figure this out?! Then fire them all!

Blessed Hussein hisself was the Won.

Squirm baby squirm!
Disco inferno.

Someone is lying. Most likely more than one person.

Subpoena everyone in the loop and interview them separately behind closed doors and find out whose stories don´t add up.

Be relentless and remind them all of the penalty for perjury.

Four good men died to protect Obama´s public image.

Someone has to pay for these crimes.

Find them. Prosecute them.

As McCain said, this needs a select committee. How many more Americans are going to be murdered before someone holds this administration accountable?

Get ready for the press to cover this 24 hours a day. (not).

Someone will leak. It will come out eventually. Always does.

Oh my, oh my. Are they going to ask the tough questions? Who changed the cover-up story? Who´s sleeping with who?

These are not the questions that need to be asked.

Why have Russia, China and Iran very vocally allied themselves with Assad´s Syria? Why has Russia deployed troops to protect Russia´s mediteranean naval port, which is in Syria? Why has NATO pledged it´ full support to Turkey in any actions that Turkey decides to take against Syria? Why is Turkey so upset about missile attacks on their airforce? Why is the Russian representative in the UN condemning "someone" in the west of criminaly running guns from fallen Libya into Syria? Why after the latest attack on Turkish aircraft did a Turkish representative covertly meet with Stevens in Benghazi? How lucky is that Turkish representative to have left the meeting with Stevens minutes before an attack? Why is it that Russia, China, Iran, NATO, Turkey, the Islamic Brotherhood are all in Syria during a civil war making loud angry noises? Why is there no doubt in my mind that obama is running weapons to rebel forces in Syria (in all fair play obama does have a history with gun running in Mexico)? With all of the worlds military powers right in the middle of a nasty civil war with angry points of view, why is no one in washington asking anything about this situation?

Start with who handed Petreaus the revised talking points and work your way back.