"Inter-agency process"??? Sounds like garbage to me that he and others can hide behind. Someone, somewhere evidently CHANGED the text. No PROCESS did anything. An actual person or persons did.

It´s OBama who is responsible whether he wants to say so or not. It is OBAMA who OWNS the f*cking processes!!!!

Of course it never occured to these senate idiots to ask WHY Petreaus changed his story and WHO is the inter=agency process.

And he proves to be a coward after all, hiding behind washington-speak.. shameful, go have another extramarital affair mr. honorable..

This is a salon, not a saloon.

Find the people on this "inter-agency" and you´ll find who´s pulling Obama´s strings and who is actually running this country.

And wouldn´t you like to know??!!

So much for military honor.

I could hear him falling on his sword all the way in CA. What a sad end to an estimable military career.

"Inter-agency Process" = Obama´s creatures decide what truth is.

It seems to me, hearing Peter King on FOX this morning that they got a whole bunch of nothing in that "hearing." Clinton and Obama still off the hook day after day.....

Who would stand to benefit from the video myth? Answer: Barack Hussein Obama. His Arab Spring/Osama-is-dead narrative has to be protected. It’s obvious that the WH hatched the myth, and leaned on Petraeus to fudge his original testimony, almost certainly by blackmailing him with exposure of his affair.

Because that is crime, and one that involves an act of war against America, it rises to the level of high crimes and misdemeanors.

The house must impeach.

Valerie Jarrett edited the talking points while O was packing for his fundraising trip to Las Vegas

It may not have changed the election. People I talked to about it did not think Benghazi was important, they don´t understand how it could impact them, it didn´t interfere with their TMZ.

-

Inter-agency Process = Who is in charge of this process? If we are to believe this is a compilation of reports from all intelligence departments, then which dept originated the video narrative that was included in Rice´s talking points?

Mr. Honorable or not, if they don´t ask the questions they can´t get the answers. It appears they weren´t asking the hard questions just providing a forum for the Administration (which Petraeus seems to still be a part of, at least in his heart)to layout their story.

Unfortunately, #13 is correct. We have a kardashian electorate, and once the Fat Bast*rd implicitly endorsed president zero, the election was decided.
I have been around since FDR was president, lived through Nixon´s presidency, Ford´s ineptitude, bill clinton´s perversions, and this is the first time in my life that I hold little hope that our republic as a constitutional democracy will stand.
I say that in all seriousness. We are doomed.
President Zero´s campaign has found the formula for bringing out the minority and lower class vote - the 47%, if you will, and that will be the template for future elections, presidential and congressional.

# 13 - is totally correct.

Eric Erickson on his talk show mentioned it also. Four people dead did not change any DemoRat minds enough to go vote Romney.

The number of Obama votes was down, so we really do not know why they stayed home. Not many changed their votes to Romney.

My uber liberal npr listening sister said to me " there is something wrong with the timeline in Benghazi".

"it smells like a cover up"

Sex may sell papers, but murder and cover up are easily understood as well.

I still want to know who ordered the Stand Down.

And where are the Survivors who flew out the next morning.

Has anyone seen / heard??

Petraeus resigned so he could tell the truth without fear.

Easy there, #1.

So, does liberal, super brilliant rice enjoy being used as a stupid tool of the dem party? Is she hitting the bottle as hard as hillary is in order to tolerate their supine position under king obama´s foot?

"an inter-agency process"

Translation: Herself, the Cold and Joyless, had put her not-so-inconsiderable thumb on the scale.

And with that much shift in priorities, Susan Rice had to have known beforehand the actual involvement of al-Qaeda and its parent organization, the Muslim Brotherhood.

Yet she repeated the patent fabrication.

Petraeus benefactor in the White House ain´t gonna be happy about this testimony. Can´t wait to hear more....

I already knew that anything out of Susan Rice´s mouth would be a lie. Who ordered the STAND DOWN???? That´s the most important question. Who let these 4 brave Americans die??? President Jarrett or Obama????

So many LIARS!

Now what happens? Please don´t tell me the Congress is goingto let this pass. Soldiers, sailors , Marines, Ambassadors and consul staff must be wondering what about if it was me? This does not generate a feeling of confidence. Call Val Jar in to testify under oath. Leave her Secret Service guard outside.

Don´t hold your breath while waiting for the pseudo-communsit main stream media to support the thesis that Obama´s goons removed the line. They´ll just keep on lying, and lying, and lying, and lying and being the Obama propaganda arm. As for Rice, she´s the modern day "Manchurian Candidate" and will continue to spew her mindless babble forever.

#1 and #26 the answer is spelled SOROS

# 13 I can´t tell you how many educated , professional people I have encountered
that don´t have a clue about Benghazi.
Rove and Sheldon Adelson and the other Super PACS should have spent their millions
trying to buy one of the tv networks.
That might have done more good.
So...are we to believe that the Director of the CIA never told the President ????
Or that Obama never asked Petraeus ? -Oh wait, I can buy that.
Was Petraeus under oath ?
The Democrats and the media continue to focus on the video and ignore the bigger story.
That someone in the Oval Office decided that an
entire consulate of 34 " folks " should burn to death.
Now.. if they were NBA players or rappers in danger , I absolutely believe Barry would have leapt into action and ordered
every asset possible immediately
deployed to save them.
Barry took Jay- Z and Beyonce into the Situation Room , but,
he wouldn´t enter it to save the folks in danger at Benghazi .
Some Americans are obviously more expendable than others.

The talking points were altered because Susan is a black woman - - who is also pro-abortion.

Hmmmm? Black? Woman? Pro-abortion? OK. Nothing to see here, folks.

NEXT!

It´s like evolution. All of the pieces magically rearranged themselves and formed a talking point without any possible intelligent input.

Petraeus,started the ball rolling, by his testimony today. Now Congress has to build on it and see where it goes. Hopefully the Pres. and his Mob will be nailed for changing the CIA´s original report on Benghazi?

The truth about Bengazi would not have altered the election results. This election was determined by the greedy, the frightened, and the dumb. These voters do not love their country enough to do the right thing in the voting booth and put their country first.

I don´t think most people ever bought into the idea that it was the video that started things in Benghazi.Certainly not the regulars at this forum.A question that I wonder about is why was it U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice that was asked to go on the talk shows with the fabricated "talking points"?
As far as who was the final authority on what was to be said I agree with those who say Obama because he did not want the Al Qaeda connection made because it would contradict his claim that we had Al Qaeda on the run.

This things smells a lot like Axelrod and that ain´t good.

Bet Jarrett and Axelrod´s fingerprints are all over those edited talking points. And Susan Rice is a fool to be setup to go on TV and flat out lie. I think that Rice like Obama are at best middling talents who have ridden the affirmative action train to fat city.

Can´t expect the Democrats or their supporters to care about the Benghazi terrorist attack. None of the victims were of gender or race.

How about Tom Donilon, National Security Adviser, and the person charged with keeping eruptions down during the last critical months of Obie´s close race for reelection?

Read on:

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/24/us/politics/tom-donilon-a-manager-of-overseas-crises.html?pagewanted=all

Perhaps he tinkered with the wording in the CIA intel before they became Susan Rice´s public talking points....

If in the course of attacking the embassy, the terrorists would have somehow disabled all Obamaphones, there would have been hell to pay.

The news is whatever the press makes it to be. if they dont print it , it never happened. AND, if nothing happened , and they say it did,......well it did !. The media stopped reporting truth a long time ago, what drives them is agenda.

Read the link at #41. After reading I agree, Tom Donilon changed the talking points and briefed Rice.

This paves the way for a Special Select Committee in investigate and have PUBLIC hearings. McCain has said as much. There are too many different branches of this administration that have given conflicting testimony and then we have the statements from Rice and the testimony of the others already. Too bad for Obama that we were paying attention when they lied. Now we just have to sort out who it was that told Rice what to say. Shouldnt be too complicated.

I like Rep. King´s gutsy approach -- usually...

BUT -- me thinks thou doth DC/speak too much....

He´s the one who called the president a liar at the first state of the union speech obama made. Remember?

LZK

Rice is a far left hack, #23, who knows her path to a lifetime of cozy top government jobs. She happily does as he is told by her masters.

I see you´re all enjoying "Survivor- Mordor On The Potomac". So Petraeus is kicked off the island. Who will it be next week? Oooo can´t wait to watch........

It should be no secret to the morons in Congress that it was the Obama crew who changed the talking points, as Obama has been removing all references to Muslims and terrorists from just about everything that happens. Remember what happened at Fort Hood when a Muslim yelling "gos is great" murdered a group of US soldiers, the Obama crew called it an instance of workplace violence!

After the smoke clears, and if he plays the game, Petraeus could well get another job with the Obama crew, he does not want to mess that up, and besides his spouse still holds down a $178,000.00 a year job with the Obama crew in Washington, DC and he does not want any "revenge" to be taken against her.

Susan Rice, even being considered for the position if Secretart if State is laughable. But under this corrupt administration, probable.

# 46, Yes, I wish Mr. King would cease so many tv appearances. Perhaps, he has been appointed the "designated" speaker by the House, but....

I still believe Hillary has a lot of dirt under her fingernails and just maybe it was she who recommended Amb.Rice.

I am sure that Peter King did not tell everything that was said in that committee hearing. We can start to figure this out ourselves. All we need is a smoking gun to prove that the Preezy is the guilty one. The question remains why he ordered the stand down because it could have only been him. What was happening in Benghazi that he didn´t want to be known. The more events unfold with Israel, it becomes clear that this was planned if Obama won. The fix was on. This is just plain ugly and frightening.

Re #46, Rep. Peter King is the chairman of the House Committee on Homeland Security, which I believe is one of the committees holding these hearings.

No, #46, Joe Wilson shouted "you lie",
not Peter King.

#26....That´s the real question!!!...WHO ordered the stand-down.....WHO....When will we have the answer!

has it yet sunk in that closed door testimony is used to keep the suspects from knowing what is going to hit them and prevents them from twisting the facts?
kept in the dark the targets often panics and destroys their own selves.
For all anyone knows waiting was protecting lives such as family and opposing candidate.

Re #53, in addition to his chairmanship of the House Homeland Security Committee, King also sits on the House Intelligence Committee before which Petraeus appeared today. He is very involved in the Benghazi investigation and an excellent spokesperson.

The real issue is who told our troops to stand down. You and I know who, but getting it pinned on Zippy will be impossible.

Next, no one altered anything. It is a made-up lie. Think about it. By blaming an unknown person, it allows Petraeus to provide distance for Zippy in this whole mess and provides cover for Rice, who Zippy has a grand designs for her career.

Also, FTA:

"The original talking points were much more specific about al-Qaeda involvement and yet the finals ones just said´ indications of extremists."

Apparently from the article, the CIA didn´t mention anything about a video. OK, then who instilled the idea of a video causing the riot that was espoused by Rice et al (including Zippy)?

With what authority does the UN ambassador speak on attacks of our consulate in Libya? She should have no superior knowledge of what took place over there so why did she make the rounds on Sunday? Obviously she was serving as the spokesperon for Obama who chose to hide behind the skirt of a black woman for cover. What a cowardly piece of work he is. Winnow through the possible candidates to speak on the Libyan attack and you can easily see why she was chosen.

The Dems and Zero will politicize your grandmother, the weather, large sodas, McDonalds´s - and four dead Americans.
Is anyone surprised?

By Petraeus´s own admission today he knew at the time of his testimony on 9/14 that the video story was at best a deliberate misdirection, and at worst an outright lie. So at the time of his original testimony on 9/14 his integrity had already been compromised. He had already been brought into and was an active part of the coverup conspiracy, so he would not have been surprised by the story Rice was spreading on her 9/16 talk show tour. We aren´t going to get the full truth out of these people short of a full-on CIA interrogation. You get the bucket, I´ll get the towel.

Did they happen to ask you General P, why you originally said the video did it? This little factoid says more to me about you than romancing the Spider woman.

Since you are off the White House Christmas list, does wife Holly get to keep her big salaried job? (Is she as qualified for the post as much as Moochelle was back in Chicago?)

Obama has said publicly that he ordered that all necessary measures (or some such wording) be taken to protect americans in Libya. Obviously it was Valerie Jarrett who overruled him and sent out the orders to stand down. If anyone comes after Valerie Jarrett the chivalrous Obama will come to her defence reminding everyone to come after him and leave the lady alone.

nobody cares . . . they´ll just continue to stumble along in total confusion and nothing, absolutely nothing will be done.

Okay so Petraeus testified and did a 180. Big deal. Now what? I agree with above posters. A corrupt press that is still carrying Zero´s water, a totally non-engaged majority electorate, another 4 years of "I Won", and a castrated Republican leadership and this story gets out how? Nothing to see here. Move on.

Re #65 Unfortunately, I think it is up to us to get the story out. Tell everyone you know.

If Obama gets another couple of Justices as he might, the succession amendment will go the way of the dodo. Thus Obama will run again in 2016 and win,
and we will be stuck with these hacks for yet anoter term

#17

Listening to the Mark Levin show on the way home tonight I heard a story about a young man who knows an illegal who voted Obama. The illegal said "sucks to be you, great to be me". This illegal works, votes himself benefits, and thinks it´s funny.

The bus loads of Somalians - who can´t even read but were helped to vote - all the illegals for whom "providing ID would just be too terrifying", and all the others who vote themselves other people´s money just prove that our ancestors were correct: the republic will last until people figure out they can vote themselves money.

Romney would have been a great POTUS for those of us who believe in paying our way - and we were outvoted ergo the republic will not last.

There will be a revolution and I believe that is what Obama wants. And my personal opinion is he wants to convert the US to Muslim rule. I think Obama believes that Allah has parted the waters for him to enact this. And with what he´s gotten away with so far I can understand why he thinks this.

These are desperate times.

"an inter-agency process."
That´s like saying a "computer error". Or "the dog ate my homework. " Somewhere in all three of those, a human was involved.

The Gen did good. His agenda might have been to lay a trap for the DC demorats...the high ones, catch them ALL (the high placed commies) and then spring the latch to leave them with their pants down. If so, he has succeeded getting them down to their briefs..or boxers as the case me be. ´Betraeus´, not so fast Mr Chan.