A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy

































   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


Karl Rove: Mitt Romney
Had A ‘Butt Ugly’ GOP
Primary Campaign

Mediaite, by Andrew Kirell

Original Article

Posted By:KarenJ1, 11/16/2012 10:23:07 AM

Continuing the post-election Republican streak of using buttocks-related phrases to describe the party’s electoral defeat, GOP strategist and Fox News analyst Karl Rove said Wednesday night that Mitt Romney lost thanks in part to a “butt-ugly” GOP primary campaign that helped paint him in an “unfavorable light” for the actual presidential campaign season. Rove made the case that Romney’s campaign took severe damage at multiple points throughout the 2012 presidential campaign. The brutally long Republican primary campaign had “way too many debates,” Rove said, adding that they tended to focus on social

Comments:
Heavy sigh. I originally wanted Rick Perry to get the nomination. Unfortunately, for whatever reason he collapsed under the pressure. So will Rove help lead us to another devastating loss the next time??

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: jeffreyabigail, 11/16/2012 10:33:23 AM     (No. 9018279)

Why in the world do they agree to so many debates? How many debates did Ronald Reagan have when he ran in 1980? I bet not too many. And there has to be some kind of standard to get into the debates. No more Herman Cain´s please.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Redneck In NY, 11/16/2012 10:39:28 AM     (No. 9018300)

Single issue (Repub) voters will continue to kill any hope of a true conservative candidate. This is the reason we had 10 guys running for the nomination, and so many debates.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: TheMotherCO, 11/16/2012 10:39:58 AM     (No. 9018305)

As usual, Karl is correct - the debates were won by Romney but media claimed their little moron bammy was best. Debates are a useless preview of what a President will do, but somehow I cannot believe that the American people were so stupid as to vote for the black moron.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Feebie, 11/16/2012 10:40:00 AM     (No. 9018306)

What a charming man.... s/


Reply 5 - Posted by: rosewater, 11/16/2012 10:47:52 AM     (No. 9018325)

I don´t want to hear from Rove anymore. Next!!


Reply 6 - Posted by: OhMy, 11/16/2012 10:49:18 AM     (No. 9018329)

Poor Romney - it is not about Romney it is about the country. Many votes for Romney were really votes against Obama. Romney trashed his rivals in the primary but would not trash his enemies in the election campaign. This is something that needs to change. I remember Mark Levin experessed concern that these loosing GOP candidates would not be able to unite behind Romney after what he did not them in the primary. Is Rove going to give an unopposed path to the next nomination for an articulate genuine conservative or is he only asking for a clear path for an establishment candidate?


Reply 7 - Posted by: bluehouse, 11/16/2012 10:49:58 AM     (No. 9018333)

Gingrich couldn´t handle his primary campaign finances, Bill Clinton, or his massive baggage - all self inflicted. Cain hadn´t even been elected dog-catcher. Santorum couldn´t win his senate seat. Bachmann barely won her house seat. Perry wasn´t ready. Ron Paul was his usual distraction without a real purpose. You go to war with the army you have - Romney.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: harleynyc, 11/16/2012 10:52:14 AM     (No. 9018345)

Memo to Rove: Not interested. Go away.


Reply 9 - Posted by: chillijilli, 11/16/2012 10:56:31 AM     (No. 9018358)

Pardon me. But I guess that butt ugly is in the eyes of the beholder and my eyes see Rove himself as butt ugly Hes just sore that he made an idiot of himself with his little dry eraser board. And I am SICK of talking heads running off at the mouth about how Romney ran his campaign. Name ONE other candidate who would´ve gotten as far as he did! Others may have said what some wished , but the media would´ve DESTROYED them in the 1st month.


Reply 10 - Posted by: King of all trolls, 11/16/2012 10:57:00 AM     (No. 9018362)

Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich and Rick Perry did a great job of poisoning the well. None of these guys were even close to ready for Primetime and by attacking the character of Romney rather than his policies and record was particularly toxic. And then there was the Herman Cain sideshow act. Not a good way to develop a winner, especially when up against messiah and his loyal court eunuchs in the media. On the other hand, mitt improved dramatically as a debater thanks to all the chaos of primary season. Romney also shares some of the blame for slipping on the kid gloves during the second and third presidential debates.


Reply 11 - Posted by: chuck koala, 11/16/2012 11:00:04 AM     (No. 9018370)

There´s a lot of "groupthink" these days. 1. My feeling is Rove did an ok job. and 2. Romney´s 47% comments and this one this time about "gifts" were supposed to be private. Inner circle, tight group, and secure. 3. Someone´s a RAT!


Reply 12 - Posted by: MHR, 11/16/2012 11:00:41 AM     (No. 9018375)

Limit campaigns to one yr prior to the election, primaries and all...2 debates and that´s it!


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: reilly, 11/16/2012 11:11:57 AM     (No. 9018411)


Rove, in the name of God, go.


Reply 14 - Posted by: tenncon231, 11/16/2012 11:20:27 AM     (No. 9018423)

Karl--take the next 15 years as a full time job getting "hair plugs"! We know it will take that long for the plugs to take as the "fertilizer" under your chrome dome is nothing but B S.


Reply 15 - Posted by: Foggybottom, 11/16/2012 11:26:10 AM     (No. 9018436)

The party elites and their groupies will find their reasons for loss by looking in a mirror.


Reply 16 - Posted by: capt scurvey, 11/16/2012 11:27:52 AM     (No. 9018441)

I´ve had enough Karl Rove to last me quite a while, thanks...


Reply 17 - Posted by: Coy860, 11/16/2012 11:31:02 AM     (No. 9018449)

I was right in the thick of things here in Florida, and if Romney had campaigned against Obama the way he did against Gingrich, we would be calling him President-elect Romney today.
Where did Romney´s "fight" go once he got the nomination?


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Italiano, 11/16/2012 11:38:32 AM     (No. 9018465)

You can bet that Rove will be back. In 2016. With Jeb Bush.

Assuming that we still have a country left by then.


Reply 19 - Posted by: bmoc, 11/16/2012 11:43:42 AM     (No. 9018480)

Also in Florida.... and I agree with #18. Rightly or wrongly, Romney´s campaign waged a scorched earth diatribe against fellow Republicans but I saw none of that against Obama. Curious.


Reply 20 - Posted by: thethirdruffian, 11/16/2012 11:44:41 AM     (No. 9018482)

Romney´s lies and slanders against fellow Republicans during the primary is what convinced me he was not worth voting for.


Reply 21 - Posted by: thethirdruffian, 11/16/2012 11:45:58 AM     (No. 9018487)

#18 Romney follows Reagan´s Golden Rule --- except Romney modifies it to "not speak ill of fellow Democrats."


Reply 22 - Posted by: chumley, 11/16/2012 12:06:36 PM     (No. 9018553)

Go away Rove. Experts like you have been forcing "moderate" candidates and failed elections on us for far too long.
Maybe you could retire and write a book nobody will read.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: woofwoofwoof, 11/16/2012 12:25:59 PM     (No. 9018603)

I´m another had more than enough of Rove.


Reply 24 - Posted by: Not your typical New Yorker, 11/16/2012 12:27:08 PM     (No. 9018607)

We need more Lee Atwater and less Karl Rove.


Reply 25 - Posted by: Rolfnader, 11/16/2012 12:39:31 PM     (No. 9018639)

It took a lot longer than I thought for someone to get around to blaming this on Sarah. Oh, I knew it would happen- just didn´t think it would be here.


Reply 26 - Posted by: Passion, 11/16/2012 12:46:41 PM     (No. 9018655)

Rove, Mitt and his super pacs MADE it butt ugly. They attacked Newt long before Newt ever attacked them. This is all Roves fault, Mitt´s fault, and Mitts super pacs fault.

For any of you Mitt drones too retarded to remember history, go check it out. Facts are stubborn things.


Reply 27 - Posted by: RightShoe, 11/16/2012 12:47:22 PM     (No. 9018658)

Rove is right. But this was largely his own fault.

Who let George Stephanopolous into the debates? Who chose the number of debates? Who decided to go negative on every candidate? Team Romney did, that’s who. From the get go we were told that it was Romney, or else! And it was team Romney and his surrogates, Coulter, Rubin and Sununu that assassinated all the other candidates. I have to admit, I would have preferred “else” to Romney.

At the end of the primary, Romney won, but he emerged much weaker than when he went in and our strongest advocates for the Republican Party - who could have been there to articulate positive and effective messages - were left too wounded and discredited to help him out.

Santorum made some very effective arguments about the positive economic impacts of social conservatism. But Santorum was an idiot! Right? Bye Rick.

Gingrich has always made excellent arguments about the economic benefits of smaller government, and he implemented them when he was in congress. But Gingrich is an arrogant adulterer! Right? (Like democrats care about these things.) Bye Newt.

Cain may not have been a good President, but destroying him meant that he was no longer available to reach out to the minority community. He could have done that. Mr. electable could have used some help there. Bye Herman.

Perry blew it. Too bad that one.

In the end, Mr. Electable stood alone, and he didn’t get elected - because he left himself looking butt ugly.

Good Bye, Karl, oh Great Master of Hindsight.


Reply 28 - Posted by: italianlooks, 11/16/2012 12:52:03 PM     (No. 9018671)

The election was lost during the Primary..Canabilation never works.

There is no "I" in "Team." We preach this to our children from early youth. These folks never got the word. So smart they are dumb!

The individual were willing to lose the election and country rather than bow out gracefully! In the end we all lost!


Reply 29 - Posted by: TXknitter, 11/16/2012 1:03:18 PM     (No. 9018698)

Rove has to blame somebody - and it´s always those pesky conservatives, purists, Sarah, etc.! The slurs flying fast and ugly from the heart of the party establishment. Conservatives fell for this junk for the last time. Expect another loss if his next brilliant idea is a Bush for 2016.


Reply 30 - Posted by: cym rhondda, 11/16/2012 1:14:18 PM     (No. 9018716)

Hey! Reply 2.Redneck In NY. ´Single issue (Repub) voters will continue to kill any hope of a true conservative candidate...´

Would one of those single issues be the MASSACRE of the unborn?

Abortion on demand is not an ISSUE, it is cold blooded MURDER. A ´true conservative candidate´ would NEVER be a baby killer.

´Righteousness exalteth a nation but sin is a reproach to any people.´


Reply 31 - Posted by: rmsimms, 11/16/2012 1:57:12 PM     (No. 9018825)

If Newt or Santorum had gotten the nomination, we would have lost the House, too. Newt is the worst sort of hypocrite and Santorum is a fanatic.


Reply 32 - Posted by: PageTurner, 11/16/2012 2:05:54 PM     (No. 9018845)

I wouldn´t vote for Santorum - he hates free trade and I don´t think I could take four years of gooey treacle over that handicapped kid. Newt or Cain were the ones I liked best - both of them besmirched themselves however, so let´s look for a Newt without the baggage.


Reply 33 - Posted by: ColonialAmerican1623, 11/16/2012 6:07:59 PM     (No. 9019343)

According to a minority voter today, it was that 47% comment. My response was about the people that enjoy being poor with perks.

It´s numbers and if you think they outnumber us today, think what it will be in four years after another floodgate opens.


Reply 34 - Posted by: doctorfixit, 11/18/2012 5:18:01 AM     (No. 9021478)

Karl Rove would prefer that the establishment pick be selected by secret ballot and signaled with white smoke. Please go away Mr. sour grapes loser, we told you your establishment RINO guy would lose. The debates were great. Why should Republicans be afraid to have more opportunities to communicate, unless they aren´t really interested in communicating with potential voters? Herman Cain would have made a great candidate, too bad he got railroaded. Ron Paul was fantastic. Gingrich was great. The only ones who bombed were Perry and the assistant Sunday School preacher from Pennsylvania.



Post Reply   Close thread 712305




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"



Krauthammer: Obama "Essence Of Exactly
The System That He Denounced And He
Promised He Would Messianically Redeem"
Real Clear Politics, by Ian Schwartz    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/5/2013 11:37:06 AM     Post Reply
CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER: There´s a larger issue here, which I think you´re overlooking. CHRIS WALLACE: No doubt. KRAUTHAMMER: I just have to get that in. I mean, Obama runs in 2008 as the man who is going to change our politics. You know, he is only going to implement new ideas, he is going to change the way Washington works. And the essence of the corruption he was attacking was the money. So, number one, in ´08, he is the first who refuses public financing for his campaign, he raises a billion dollars. And now what he is doing,

Obama: ‘We Still Waste Money in
All Kinds of Things That Don´t Work’
Weekly Standard, by Jeryl Bier    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/5/2013 11:11:44 AM     Post Reply
At a Democratic National Committee fund raising event in Atherton, California Thursday morning, President Obama declared that the United States government still needs to get its fiscal house in order: We still waste money in all kinds of things that don´t work, and we have the capacity to shift those dollars into things that do work and that will grow our economy. And we can reduce our deficit, stabilize our debt, and do so without sacrificing the kinds of investments that are going to be required to grow. During his remarks, the president spoke of the

Controversial Preacher Removed
from Diversity Day Program
Fox News, by Todd Starnes    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/5/2013 11:08:11 AM     Post Reply
Michael Pfleger, the controversial Catholic priest who made racial remarks about Hillary Clinton and defended Louis Farrakhan, has been removed as a keynote speaker at a diversity day event sponsored by a federal government agency. A spokesperson for the Broadcasting Board of Governors told Fox News that Pfleger’s office has been notified that his invitation to address the group has been rescinded. “This is an event that is meant to celebrate inclusiveness and diversity,” spokesperson Lynne Weil told Fox News. “It was deemed by our senior management that it was not appropriate to have him as a speaker.”

Students Want Anti-Gay Priest
Removed from University
Fox News, by Todd Starnes    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/5/2013 11:04:03 AM     Post Reply
Religious liberty groups are mobilizing to defend the chaplain of George Washington University’s Newman Center after gay students launched an effort to have the priest fired because he preaches against homosexuality and abortion. “It’s discrimination against Catholics,” said Patrick Reilly, president of the Cardinal Newman Society. “Secular colleges are fast becoming a very unsafe place for Catholics who hold true to their faith. This is a very, very sad situation.” Two gay students at George Washington told the GW Hatchet student newspaper that they want Father Greg Shaffer removed from campus

Carney: Obama´s fundraising push for
Pelosi in Calif. a ´traditional exercise´
The Hill [Washington, DC], by Justin Sink    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/5/2013 10:43:22 AM     Post Reply
White House press secretary Jay Carney on Thursday defended President Obama´s fundraising swing through California, saying that despite "rhetoric from the other side" critical of the president, his push on behalf of Democratic Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi was "a traditional exercise." "I think it’s important to note that -- because you’ve seen a lot of rhetoric from the other side suggesting that there is something wrong with that -- that Republican leaders in the House and the Senate have been out raising money for Republican candidates;

First key fight in immigration battle
is what to name the reform bill
The Hill [Washington, DC], by Molly K. Hooper    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/5/2013 10:39:00 AM     Post Reply
One of the first political issues negotiators must tackle in crafting an immigration reform bill is among the most important: what to name it. It’s a decision that will bruise egos, create legacies and deeply affect subsequent messaging battles. “Every time the bill is mentioned in the press, you either have a brand that´s positive or a brand that doesn´t mean anything or even hurts you,” said Frank Sharry, the executive director of the pro-immigration reform group America’s Voice. The wrong name, he warned, could doom a good bill. “If there´s not a

Psychiatrist warned campus
police about Aurora shooter
a month before mass murder
Hot Air, by Ed Morrissey    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/5/2013 10:05:18 AM     Post Reply
In a revelation that may have Colorado voters rethinking their state’s push on gun control, court documents revealed that the mass shooting in Aurora that killed 12 and injured 70 more could have been prevented by law enforcement. The psychiatrist for suspect, James Holmes, had warned campus police that Holmes was dangerous and homicidal a month before the shooting took place. Lynne Fenton even told the police that Holmes had begun to stalk and threaten her, and yet no action was apparently taken: A University of Colorado psychiatrist told campus police a month before the Aurora

Rep. Peter King attacks Sen.
Marco Rubio for voting against
Sandy funding
Washington Times, by Seth McLaughlin    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/5/2013 9:58:55 AM     Post Reply
Rep. Peter King of New York on Friday cast Sen. Marco Rubio as a hypocrite for voting against the the Hurricane Sandy relief package and expressed disbelief that the Florida senator would then turn around and try to raise campaign money in the region. Mr. King questioned how Mr. Rubio could vote against the $60 million in relief for New York and New Jersey when Florida has received loads of federal money for Hurricane victims. “Guys like Marco Rubio of Florida, with all the money that you people have gotten in Florida over the years, with every hurricane

Attorney General Eric Holder:
Jail time for blacks is too long
Washington Times, by Cheryl K. Chumley    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/5/2013 9:53:14 AM     Post Reply
Attorney General Eric Holder expressed “concern” Thursday evening that black men are unfairly served with longer prison sentences than white men and that America’s prison system demands overhaul. “Too many people go to too many prisons for far too long for no good law enforcement reason,” Mr. Holder said, in remarks to the Rev. Al Sharpton’s National Action Network in New York, Politico reported. “It is time to ask ourselves some fundamental questions about our criminal justice system. … It is time to examine our systems and determine what truly works.” Mr. Holder said in the Politico report

TV news ´lies´ about
Obama, ex-speechwriter says
Washington Examiner, by Paul Bedard    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/5/2013 9:48:55 AM     Post Reply
President Obama and other Washington politicians are getting a bum rap on TV news as money-grubbers and power-grabbers, views the president´s former top speechwriter calls lies, especially those aimed at his former boss. Jon Favreau told students at Harvard University´s Institute of Politics that TV portrays political leaders wrongly, and that the public ends up with a bad view of those in power. "I think that a lot of people turn on the news today, a lot of young people, and they hear people tell them that every motivation of every politician on either

Obama has “no coherent
message” for the Arab world
Washington Examiner, by Sean Higgins    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/5/2013 9:42:23 AM     Post Reply
Joyce Karam, Washington correspondent for pan-Arabic daily Al-Hayat, offers a sobering assessment on the Al-Arabiya website of the current administrations efforts in the post-”Arab Spring” Middle East. She begins by noting a how a minor recent diplomatic walkback highlights the White House’s contradictory policy: It was only fitting that the U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry announces another traditional trip to the Middle East on the same day that the U.S. embassy in Cairo withdraws its tweet advancing the case for Egyptian Comedian Bassem Youssef as he faces intimidation from the Mursi government.

Democrats have doubts
about Obamacare too
Washington Examiner, by Brian Hughes    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/5/2013 9:38:46 AM     Post Reply
President Obama is eager to build public support for his health care overhaul in the few months remaining before its implementation, but waning enthusiasm from Democrats threatens his effort right out of the gate. Two-thirds of Democrats now believe Obama´s health care reforms will either hurt them personally or have no effect on their daily lives, a Quinnipiac University poll released Thursday shows. In comparison, just 27 percent of Democratic respondents said the reforms would help them. The president has long struggled to convince independent and Republican-leaning voters that his health care blueprint would lower premiums and expand insurance coverage.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



We are living in a dying country (Thread 2)
73 replie(s)
Rushlimbaugh.com, by Rush Limbaugh    Original Article
Posted By: LComStaff- 4/7/2013 6:49:54 AM     Post Reply
This is the second thread of an article posted yesterday which can be found here:http://lucianne.com/thread/?artnum=730032

´My bangs are getting
a little irritating´: Michelle
Obama admits she already regrets
her high-maintenance hairdo

65 replie(s)
Daily Mail (UK), by Margot Peppers    Original Article
Posted By: pineledger- 4/7/2013 7:43:42 AM     Post Reply
Michelle Obama has admitted that she is already tired of the bangs she first sported in January. The First Lady said in an interview with Entertainment Tonight: ´Bangs are a day-by-day proposition. They´re starting to grow out, get a little irritating.´ Still, she hasn´t let her hairdo woes get her down. ´It´s okay,´ she said after her initial complaint. ´We´ll be good.´ The first indication that her hairstyle was becoming a burden came about last weekend, when Malia, 14, was spotted adjusting her mother´s hair during the White House Easter Egg Roll.

McCain: ´I don´t understand´
GOP filibuster on guns

65 replie(s)
Politico, by Jennifer Epstein    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/7/2013 12:18:14 PM     Post Reply
Sen. John McCain says he doesn´t understand the threats from some of his Republican colleagues to filibuster a bill on background checks to buy guns. "I don´t understand it," the Arizona Republican said on Sunday of the threat coming from Sen. Rand Paul,Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen. Mike Lee and nine other Republicans. "The purpose of the United States Senate is to debate and to vote and to let the people know where we stand.” "What are we afraid of? ... If this issue is as important as we all think it is, why not take ... it up and debate?"

Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney
General´ Comment Was a Gaffe

62 replie(s)
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM     Post Reply
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that

Christians, here´s why we´re
losing our religion

48 replie(s)
Fox News, by Craig Groeschel    Original Article
Posted By: STLstudent- 4/7/2013 5:13:55 PM     Post Reply
Recent research indicates that the number of people who do not consider themselves a part of an organized religion is steadily on the rise. Interestingly enough, though the number of those religiously unaffiliated is increasing, there is little to no trend in the number of those who express atheist or agnostic beliefs. People aren’t saying they don’t believe in God. They’re saying they don’t believe in religion. They are not rejecting Christ. They are rejecting the church. This begs the question, “Why are we losing our religion?”

Broadcasters worry
about ´Zero TV´ homes

47 replie(s)
Associated Press, by Ryan Nakashima    Original Article
Posted By: Ribicon- 4/7/2013 2:43:40 PM     Post Reply
Los Angeles — Some people have had it with TV. They´ve had enough of the 100-plus channel universe. They don´t like timing their lives around network show schedules. They´re tired of $100-plus monthly bills. A growing number of them have stopped paying for cable and satellite TV service, and don´t even use an antenna to get free signals over the air. (Snip) Last month, the Nielsen Co. started labeling people in this group "Zero TV" households, because they fall outside the traditional definition of a TV home. There are 5 million of these residences in the U.S., up from

Mother Of Slain Benghazi
Officer To Sean Hannity:
‘They Want Me To Shut Up’

44 replie(s)
Mediaite, by A.J. Delgado    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:00:16 AM     Post Reply
On Friday, Sean Hannity brought Pat Smith, mother of the late Sean Smith, on his radio program. The 34-year-old information management officer was one of four Americans murdered in the Benghazi embassy attack on September 11, 2012. In the chilling interview, a distraught Ms. Smith, in tears, pleaded for answers and spoke of the efforts to silence her. Ms. Smith first relayed how her son, prior to the attack, requested additional security in advance and warned the State Department: He did tell them, ahead of time, he typed it into his little typewriter over there,

Vanishing workforce
weighs on growth

42 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Jim Tankersley    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:28:59 PM     Post Reply
Put out an all-points bulletin: Millions of Americans have gone missing from the workforce. Every month that those would-be workers are gone raises the odds that they might never come back, dimming the prospects for future economic growth. The vanishing trend is more than a decade old, but it accelerated during the Great Recession. Throughout 2012, economists held out hope that it had stopped. But then came Friday’s jobs report, and hopes were dashed. The Labor Department reported that the U.S. labor force — everyone who has a job or is looking for one — shrank

Hillary Clinton Would Not
´Clear the Field´ for 2016

41 replie(s)
New Republic, by Tod Lindberg    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/6/2013 5:22:36 AM     Post Reply
No one is more preoccupied these days with Hillary Clinton´s 2016 plans than the Beltway political class—not even the former presidential candidate herself. To hear some tell it, her decision will be dispositive for all other Democrats thinking of entering the race. And pundits and reporters aren´t the only ones positing the "The Hillary Factor": No less than the House Democratic whip, Steny Hoyer, told BuzzFeed, “I don´t know that anybody would run against Hillary…. If she runs, she clears the field.” It´s an understandable conclusion, given Clinton´s stature in the Democratic Party and her 70 percent

Obama critic apologizes for
his ´poorly chosen words´
on gay marriage

41 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington DC], by Alexandra Jaffe    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/6/2013 12:18:19 PM     Post Reply
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson, considered by some to be a potential Republican contender for president, apologized to Johns Hopkins University for the "poorly chosen words" he used in expressing his opposition to gay marriage last month.“I am sorry for any embarrassment this has caused,” Carson said in the letter, reported in New York Magazine.(Snip) "Although I do believe marriage is between a man and a woman, there are much less offensive ways to make that point. I hope all will look at a lifetime of service over some poorly chosen words.” Carson will remain as commencement speaker at Johns Hopkins,

The Secrets of Princeton
40 replie(s)
New York Times, by Ross Douthat    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 8:08:09 AM     Post Reply
Susan Patton, the Princeton alumna who became famous for her letter urging Ivy League women to use their college years to find a mate, has been denounced as a traitor to feminism, to coeducation, to the university ideal. But really she’s something much more interesting: a traitor to her class. Her betrayal consists of being gauche enough to acknowledge publicly a truth that everyone who’s come up through Ivy League culture knows intuitively —

Is going gluten-free
healthier for everybody?

33 replie(s)
The Week, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: NorthernDog- 4/7/2013 11:28:27 AM     Post Reply
Gluten-free diets are all the rage, but they can be dangerous if not done right. What is gluten? It´s the spongy complex of proteins, found naturally in wheat, rye, and barley, that gives elasticity to dough and allows it to rise. When flour is moistened and either kneaded or mixed into dough, gluten molecules form an elastic, microscopic latticework that traps the carbon dioxide produced when yeast ferments, causing dough to inflate like a hot air balloon. Baking hardens the gluten, which helps the finished product keep its shape. Wheat — and gluten — is ubiquitous in the American diet.


Post Reply   Close thread 712305





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS