So where the HECK are the other 30 or so people extracted the next day? Are they all in a detention center or what? And why is no one asking this question???

Do tell.

Where is Neil Young now?--

No Soldiers or Obama comin´,
Chris Stevens died all alone,
Last autumn from mortars falling
Four Dead in Libya...

Good overview of what we all know. As to the special ops forces out of Croatia this is an interesting assessment of the timeline:

http://www.captainsjournal.com/2012/11/14/trouble-with-the-benghazi-timeline/

I do wonder as well what happened to the other evacuated personnel? Why aren´t they telling their story? Are they hiding something?

No the Libya timeline doesn´t just suggest a cover up. The Libya timeline screams cover up to all who are paying attention.

That doesn´t include much of the media however, because it doesn´t fit their dogma very well.

I have wondered if those 4 were sacrificial lambs.

Really? Where were you before the election? Silent and complicit, yet now, now you question? Well, welcome to last month!

Evidence points to a quick hit planned on a defenseless compound. Chris Stephens and the bald guy,(Sorry), were to be taken out. Wearhouse emptied, and what was missing? Anyone?? Finally, lots of documents and loyal allies to expose and betray. Stand down fellow Americans, that was the Order.
They never planned for the SEALs to show up and drag out the struggle for hours. Surprise Barry. Just made your lying job, harder.

I find it amazing that the administration (FBI & Holder) would say no national security was initially involved with the Petraus investigation, so they didn´t have to notify congress, yet the same ya-hoos took nearly a month to get the FBI into Benghazi to investigate. By that time, the reporters (who didn´t seem to have a problem getting there) had scarfed up all the classified documents laying around. Ironic, isn´t it?

Deft, #3.

It´s not the fingerprints but the timeline that always nails them. Yes, the tad too clever ones. The ones who think of the gloves and the compound rehearsed stories to cover their tracks and invent plausible alibis. But, oops...that pesky timeline.

You want to be a real journalist? You want to ferret out the real story? Ask them about the blatant and unanswerable inconsistencies in the indisputable timeline.

This regime has enjoyed almost complete cover from the media. On top of that they have been able to control the American public. Why would they be concerned about a few rumors about Libya?

All this and the huge debacle at Camp Bastion unmentioned. A mini-Tet, a total surprise with no warning or security.

So Fauxbama bites back, takes umbrage at any suggestion that they could have put politics first (heaven forfend!) and the press cower.

I´ve never seen you lose. Now isn´t that special?

Using Occam´s Razor:
Patraeus, knowing the true nature of the Benghazi attack, initially testified that a video caused the attack because he was being blackmailed.

And the ´too many questions,´ will go unanswered as the scandal eventually disappears from the minds of electeds, judges and journalists. The sloppy cover-up will be filed within the same annals which house details relating to the silencing of Vince Foster and Ron Brown.

Absolutely #1. I have been waiting for interviews. Surely they must be furious and want some answers. Will they be testifying at the close door meeting?

For #1 and 18, I don´t believe there were 30 people ´´extracted´´. Remember when the fighting was going on, there was a contingent of Marines sent from Tripoli and when they got to Benghazi, they were supplemented with about 20 or so Libyans. They surrounded the compound and engaged the enemy, but had to beat feet back to Tripoli. The extraction story was just another attempt to make it look like the admin. was semi-successful at outraged Muzzie crowd control.

No information of WHO decided to develop the $70 million video shown in Pok-is-stan apologizing for the 15 minute trailer. Just when did instructions come to produce that and who could do it in less than 24 hours and secure viewing time on Pokie T.V.
Was the LIAR-in-Chief trying to expand eruptions of protest in other regions with their apology video.

Can´t remember where, but I read that the "other thirty" are CIA employees and now in Germany.

Wouldn´t want them chatting frankly about what was going on day to day in the last two months before the attack. And we really wouldn´t want them telling about the last seven hours.

Imagine the carrot and stick treatment they´re experiencing right now.

Ya think?

Correct #6, beware of media generated "timelines" such as the one put on line by CBS as they tend to distort reality.CBS totally fails to list Clinton´s rant about the "video" and anything that in any way puts the real culprits in this Administration in a bad light.

FTA: "Still lingering is the issue of an exact timeline for President Obama on Sept. 11 after the White House received a State Department email about 4 p.m. (10 p.m. Libya time) stating that the consulate was under attack."

This itself contains a deception: implying that the message was normal "email" from the consulate, rather than "flash message" traffic, which is transmitted via secure, priority channels directly into the WH situation room, and, per protocols, is required to be hand-delivered by the watch officer to the President or his immediate representative. Bottom line: there is NO WAY Zero didn´t know virtually in real time that the consulate was under attack and the situation was desperate.

How a coverup works ....

While delaying, splash all sorts of counter stories, alternative theories and outlandish accusations into the MSM through third parties until the whole thing is such a hash no one can untangle it

Of the 30 or so survivors....they must have family members stateside. Where are those family members and why have they not stepped forward to ask questions or make a statement? Are they being held as well? Have they lost their tongue? Threatened? Why has not one family member shouted? The former Navy SEAL´s dad has been speaking in public for the past two months. Where are the others?

Here´s the tough question I want the media to demand Zippy to answer - -

"Will you favorite color be the same in your second term as it was in your first term?"

When the leftist media has the guts to ask questions like that - - then we´ll really know what´s going on!

I´m probably wrong but this looks like a CIA operation run amok. I wouldn´t doubt that Obama, Panetta and Hillary were clueless, as to the nuts and bolts anyway, until the SHTF. Virtually "everyone" now is covering up. Whatever was going on must have been huge.

#29, what was going on was a gun-running operation to the Syrian ´opposition´ (aka, muslim brotherhood in Syria), and tring to get back the weapons we gave to the Lybian ´opposition´ (aka, the Lybian muslim brotherhood). Stephens had been the initial contact man with the Lybian oppo before they got Khadaffi, and he was trying to retrieve the stuff we had given them and send it thru Turkey to Syria. Hence the visitor from Turkey who left about an hour before the attack began.

Used to be the media would expose coverups.
Now they´re part of the coverup.

Anyone connected to our foreign embassies has to to be Shitt*ng Bricks, so to speak, at the non response of our government to the Libya Fiasco? For the government to let a ambassador hang out to die must have all of the foreign American Diplomats to be shaking in their boots????

Does it trouble the media that the Commander in Chief is taking months to figure out where he was
and what he did on September 11 ???
Obama´s very defensive and angry presser yesterday ,
complete with his voice going into the whiny high octaves
was a tell.
I bet anything that Barry was drunk, doped up or behind closed doors with his latest boy toy.
The fact that he couldn´t say at 5pm on September 11 , in the Situation Room ,
I immediately ordered all resources
deployed to rescue the Americans , is the key.
Instead , he uses the lawyerly phrase " when I was told " I then ordered blah, blah to rescue those folks.

I hope that everyone realizes what´s been missing in every story and explanation and conjecture: someone, preferably a military person who finally says, "I don´t care if you lock me up for the rest of my life and find me guilty of treason, or whatever trumped up charge you want to throw at me, the truth is ....." I cannot believe that, if something devious was planned and occurred that not ONE person would have the cajones to do this.

There are some questions I´d like answered, such as who was it at the embassy in Egypt who preemptively apologized for a video no one had ever seen? Why did they do it? To serve as an excuse for an attack that the regime knew was coming and wanted to happen?

The National Front forthe Liberation of Libya had HQ thre in Benghazi. that was apparently why Benghazi got ambassador-level
attention. We were arming the National Front
(it has some other name)alongwith Nato when the fight was on with Kadaffi.
I see no reason why we aren´t still providing guns.

"Suggests" a coverup????

Reply 1 - Posted by: texaspast, 11/14/2012 11:16:57 PM (No. 9015177)

#1 - texaspast, who knows, they might be in the same jail as the guy who made that video...