A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy

































   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


How Romney Lost
National Review Online, by Kevin D. Williamson

Original Article

Posted By:sagman, 11/7/2012 6:28:13 AM

Columbus, Ohio — The realities of the electoral map meant that the Romney campaign really had no choice but to bet big on Ohio, and that bet was a loser. In addition to some critical on-the-ground specifics — Ohio is not hurting as badly as the rest of the country — there were three main reasons for that. 1. Ohio likes crony capitalism. The automotive bailout is popular in Ohio, and not just among self-interested workers and investors in that industry. Putting General Motors on federal life support is economically daft and morally dubious, but it gave the Obama administration a powerful tool for convincing

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Johnny Angle, 11/7/2012 6:38:32 AM     (No. 8995207)

1. Keep calm and think - that is our strong suit.
2. Don't let Boehner get away with saying "The House is only one-third of the government." Make him and his crew refuse to raise the debt limit: the House is our fail-safe firewall, if they have the beliefs and courage to act that way. Let Obama walk into this new term with a fiscal punch in the nose.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Mike PHX, 11/7/2012 6:38:45 AM     (No. 8995208)

Thank you, big fat POSMan!
Aka Chris Christie.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: redmom, 11/7/2012 6:47:54 AM     (No. 8995222)

Right, Boehner is going to be our firewall.

The Tree of Liberty is dying of thirst.


Reply 4 - Posted by: dulac, 11/7/2012 6:54:34 AM     (No. 8995235)

I nominate this as a Must Read. His 3 points are dead on. Romney let the other side control the dialogue on the auto bailout and it cost him the election. Not having his surrogates step up the truth-telling on Benghazi was also a missed opportunity.

Lastly, Chris Christie put his own political career ahead of what was best for the country. He's a loose cannon and I believe every bit as much of a narcissist as Obama. Can we please quit him now???


Reply 5 - Posted by: civilservant, 11/7/2012 6:56:48 AM     (No. 8995237)

I have long trumpeted the warning siren regarding Chris Christie. But noooooo, I was shouted down here.
Well, Mitt listened to you all and aligned himself with CC.
Who traded OUR Country for a phone call from Bruce.

I am crying for the Country we just lost. America is dead.


Reply 6 - Posted by: FunnyGirl, 11/7/2012 7:00:26 AM     (No. 8995246)

You know I'm hurting as much today as anyone, but this loss had nothing to do with Chris Christie. And, until activists understand basic concepts, we'll keep losing. I live in a red state and I hear people all the time calling for more conservatives to be elected everywhere. Just because YOU don't find Christie conservative enough doesn't mean he isn't the best governor to come out of NJ in my fifty some odd years. So many at this site whined about Scott Brown not being perfect - great, because now we have Pocahontas. Today sucks, but let's not allow feelings to get in the way of facts or we will never get out of this mess.


Reply 7 - Posted by: dadawg, 11/7/2012 7:03:47 AM     (No. 8995255)

Dumb, gullible me, I was optimistic yesterday morning. Today, I feel as estranged from my country as ever, including those dark days at the end of the Vietnam era when we were ignored at best,or ridiculed and scorned. I won't call anyone an Eyore again, I am one now. I will be ending my full-time work career during this Presidential term, but I feel sorry for those remaining who are going to now feel the impact of re-electing the most economics ignorant leader in the history of the Nation. Business,including my employer, have been waiting to see what America decided before they invested in it. Now they have seen and there will be no actual recovery any time soon. Again, my apologies to even Eric Erickson and the other naysayers.

PS, I do speak Spanish, but can't see anyplace better to move. I will most likely need it just to be able to get along in the USA, since official amnesty is just around the corner.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: owl, 11/7/2012 7:06:41 AM     (No. 8995262)

" How He Lost " is the stupidist morning after quip I've ever heard . The American people are idiots THAT'S how he lost .


Reply 9 - Posted by: fobo, 11/7/2012 7:17:12 AM     (No. 8995290)

we get the leaders we deserve.


Reply 10 - Posted by: Rumblehog, 11/7/2012 7:19:16 AM     (No. 8995296)

I believe Putt n' Plugs had a lot of help from Diebold too. Still think there were about 20% of the votes cast for Romney that went to Obama by manipulation. The numbers just don't add up in the so-called "swing" states.


Reply 11 - Posted by: youngtexan, 11/7/2012 7:40:17 AM     (No. 8995356)

I felt sick all night long. Today, I'm recouperating. Right now, I'm ashamed to say that I'm an American. We now realize that we have a bigger picture here that we have to fight. And it's not gonna be pretty. Like alot of voters, Romney wasn't my first choice. Not only do we have to fight back against the politicians, but also the liberal news media. I don't know whether to laugh or cry right now.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Spidey, 11/7/2012 7:40:53 AM     (No. 8995360)

At the end of the day it was stupid white guilt voters who didn't have the stomach to give Obama the boot.Plus we really don't know how much the riot card played on people's minds.
Obama's $6 trillion in new debt bought just enough voters.


His jobs cost $300,000 a piece,what's a million bucks to buy a vote? Open borders was also a huge contributor.This country has no voter integrity at all and the left intends to keep it that way.

It's impossible to screen absentee ballots and early voting.By the time election day rolls around the results are already in.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: rabbit, 11/7/2012 7:51:09 AM     (No. 8995388)

I definitely agree on the Obamacare issue. The bill was front-loaded with some relatively small points that were popular. Talk of total repeal meant that these would go away; lots of voters didn't like that. Talk of reform of Obamacare would have been far more effective - acknowledging that there was work to be done, but making very clear that the high points wouldn't disappear.


Reply 14 - Posted by: MDConservative, 11/7/2012 7:53:57 AM     (No. 8995392)

Ohio likes crony capitalism? Seems a majority of Americans do. We're all leeches now.


Reply 15 - Posted by: Cleanhousein2012, 11/7/2012 7:55:14 AM     (No. 8995395)

He lost because he really was a lousy candidate.

Full stop.


Reply 16 - Posted by: jt26, 11/7/2012 8:12:39 AM     (No. 8995450)

Romney lost because there are now more takers than producers.


Reply 17 - Posted by: Sunhan65, 11/7/2012 8:13:05 AM     (No. 8995453)

Mitt Romney lost this election. We nominate candidates and they take responsibility for the campaign they run, and the results they achieve. Romney won our nomination by destroying his Republican opponents in the most negative primary campaign I have ever seen. It was victory by opposition research and attack ads. This gave Romney key states like Florida when he needed them, but it pushed Mitt's national favors favorable/unfavorable numbers deeply negative. As I said at that time, NO nominee has ever won the presidency with favorability numbers that bad. Romney's favorability numbers stayed under water until just a few weeks ago. And now Mitt Romney has lost to a terrible president running on a worse record with the worst economic numbers. No president has ever been reelected with economic numbers this bad. Until now. The governor is a good and decent man, but this was the most important election in the history of our country, and Mitt Romney lost.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: civilservant, 11/7/2012 8:23:43 AM     (No. 8995488)

#6, I am from NJ. I have been involved in politics most of my life.
The OPTICS of CC and the Wan walking down the shore DESTROYED the difference between the two candidates.
Best Governor NJ could get? BS. He is and always has been a lib in R clothing and he has done NOTHING in NJ that has impacted it ONE IOTA.

U.S.A 1776-2012.........R. I. P.


Reply 19 - Posted by: Italiano, 11/7/2012 8:27:55 AM     (No. 8995504)

Given the fiscal cliff, Obamacare and the Supreme Court now gone for decades, I don't think that we can come back from this one. Add in the changing voter demographics, forget it. We now have the government we deserve. It was a good run while it lasted.


Reply 20 - Posted by: starsNstripes, 11/7/2012 8:28:23 AM     (No. 8995508)

I think #8 is right: "The American people are idiots THAT'S how he lost."

I don't think Romny/Ryan connected with the product of the American public school system. Mitt is very well educated and a very good communicator; however, it appears that today's voters (aside from wanting free goodies from Uncle Sam) are simpletons that don't follow the real news and don't have a clue on how things work.

Having a candidate that is a very rich man that speaks in a polished voice about lofty principles and ideals and about complicated things like China as a currency manipulator is not a formula for success in today's USA.

Lesson learned--get a candidate that:
-Is not an Ivy league rich guy, but a product of some state university
-Is very intelligent, but coats it in a man-on-the-street package
-Identifies with the common man/woman and the struggles of daily life
-Can communicate in simple terms and persuade simple minds
-Puts together a platform that is short and meaningful and hits the simpleton's top 3 concerns (3 points to prosperity...)

I am thinking the Hispanic, female version of Herman Cain.


Reply 21 - Posted by: god of irony, 11/7/2012 8:41:42 AM     (No. 8995566)

#6 the exit polls say you are dead wrong.

Republicans must fight and educate like they mean it.


Reply 22 - Posted by: inigori, 11/7/2012 8:44:20 AM     (No. 8995581)

59.9 millions voted for McCain/Palin in 2008
56.7 millions voted for Romney/Ryan in 2012
I never liked Romney but I voted for him for the love of country..


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: connor, 11/7/2012 8:47:43 AM     (No. 8995591)

Romney is a good and decent man and did nothing wrong in his campaign. I would not have picked Paul Ryan for VP, but that is another story. Romney had to fight the fight basically by himself. Rush Limbaugh never ever gave him much support and actually bashed him at times. The entire media lashed out at him at every opportunity. I do not care for Sarah Palin, but it was sickening watching them crucify her every move. She never stood a chance. I am not sure if we can ever win another election with all the ignorant leeches out there. All waiting for their government check.


Reply 24 - Posted by: stjohnswood, 11/7/2012 9:02:06 AM     (No. 8995664)

#10 is right on the money with the Diebold comment. Add to the more obvious than ever tampered-with or pre-set machines the deliberate chaos of 'early voting', unverified and illegal voters and you have the Dems real ''ground game'' laid out in front of you! And that is how Romney ''lost''.
Right now vote fraud is like the elephant in the room. Everyone knows it's there. But no one wants to admit they can see it.


Reply 25 - Posted by: stablemoney, 11/7/2012 9:06:16 AM     (No. 8995687)

He lost. And we need a fighter, not a crier like Boehner.


Reply 26 - Posted by: killerbee, 11/7/2012 9:07:00 AM     (No. 8995690)

#7: "estranged from my country", that's a great way to put it.


Reply 27 - Posted by: Pepper Tree, 11/7/2012 9:14:10 AM     (No. 8995719)

Romney didn't lose, Americans let him and themselves down. We'll never get one as good as Romney again.

The likes of George Stephanopolis and Peter Jennings got away with lies and distractions because they were allowed to get away with it.

Americans are about to get the government they deserve for being stupid and lazy, instead of free and brave.


Reply 28 - Posted by: dman, 11/7/2012 9:25:18 AM     (No. 8995760)

Simple. He lost because he listened to the same morons who advised McCain. He left Benghazi, Sandy, voter fraud, LSM bias, and a host of other issues on the table. He played "Mr. Nice Guy". He played not to lose.

He listened to Losers, and he lost.


Reply 29 - Posted by: ok state mom, 11/7/2012 9:31:39 AM     (No. 8995777)

He is absolutely correct with assumption #1. Ohio is doing well.

My son, an entry level attorney, found employment in Ohio after being unable to do so in Oklahoma and even Texas. Granted, the company he works for is based in Oklahoma but the work is in eastern Ohio. The mom and pop "hotel" he stays at makes 40K a month off just this one company.


Reply 30 - Posted by: Dixie, 11/7/2012 9:39:31 AM     (No. 8995804)

Romney lost because the boot-licking media (or, Soros-paid media) refused to discuss Benghazi.


Reply 31 - Posted by: LadyVet, 11/7/2012 11:31:28 AM     (No. 8996341)

To get to the real reasons for this loss, you must drill down into minutia of party politics. Before you ever get the candidate, there are the party rules which allow deep blue states to have out-of-proportion influence on who the candidate is. That is why we wind up a former gov from the bluest state as our candidate. If your state can't vote for a GOP candidate on a presidential or state level, your state should not be going FIRST in line. Iowa, NH, and Nevada need to go to the back of the line. Face it, these states are not red states. We may as well let Elizabeth Warren and the Kennedy's pick our candidate.

Why should some little ol' lady from Connecticut have a position of influence on the RNC just because she has lived to be 75 years old when she cannot organize her state party well enough to ever win a election? The party rules need to be completely revamped to give these people what they deserve: a seat at the meeting, little more, until they can show that they can produce results.


Reply 32 - Posted by: tisHimself, 11/7/2012 12:09:14 PM     (No. 8996510)

XX has it right. Look away from the beltway, look away from the Ivy league. Find a candidate for whom the vice presidential choice is a liberal republican--- Jeb Bush, meaning that a genuine conservative you described is in the drivers seat.. That could be Ryan, Jindal or Susana Martinez.

It is no ones turn. Don't let us be brainwashed again.


Reply 33 - Posted by: privateer, 11/7/2012 1:30:20 PM     (No. 8996895)

Of course millions of votes were stolen! Dems always do it, and...they never get in trouble, and they win. Kind of a no brainer, Boehner.



Post Reply   Close thread 711060




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "sagman"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "sagman"



Biden to use Obama’s postelection
‘flexibility’ on weapons with Russia
Washington Times, by Dave Boyer    Original Article
Posted By: sagman- 2/1/2013 5:52:05 AM     Post Reply
Vice President Joseph R. Biden will discuss arms control Saturday with Russia’s top envoy, a meeting that could shed light on President Obama’s unguarded comment last year that he would have more “flexibility” to negotiate with the Russians after his re-election. Mr. Biden will hold a one-on-one session with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov in Munich during a four-day European trip with his wife, Jill, that begins Friday. Administration officials confirmed Thursday that the vice president’s agenda with Mr. Lavrov includes an exploration of ways to reduce both nations’ nuclear weapons stockpiles.

Kerry gets overwhelming Senate
backing to lead State Department
Washington Post, by Anne Gearan    Original Article
Posted By: sagman- 1/30/2013 6:00:46 AM     Post Reply
The Senate overwhelmingly approved Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.) as the next secretary of state Tuesday afternoon, with three Republican “no” votes. The vote was 94 to 3, clearing the way for Kerry to formally take over from Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton on Friday. He assumes the post amid a civil war in Syria that has killed an estimated 60,000 people, stalled nuclear negotiations with Iran and the spread of militancy across North Africa.

Debacle in Benghazi
Weekly Standard, by Stephen F. Hayes and Thomas Joscelyn    Original Article
Posted By: sagman- 1/23/2013 6:38:58 AM     Post Reply
On September 21, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton spoke to reporters before a meeting with the Pakistani foreign minister. She addressed the September 11 assault on U.S. facilities in Benghazi, Libya. “What happened was a terrorist attack, and we will not rest until we have tracked down and brought to justice the terrorists who murdered four Americans.” Clinton’s statement was notable. It was the strongest and most direct assessment of the attacks from any Obama administration official in the first 10 days after the deaths.

Gun Control by Executive Order?
National Review, by Scott Coffina    Original Article
Posted By: sagman- 1/16/2013 6:26:26 AM     Post Reply
The horrific recent mass murder of 26 children and adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School predictably has reignited the gun-control debate in this country. (snip) The task force led by Vice President Joe Biden has met mostly with groups either in favor of or opposed to greater restrictions on guns and ammunition. Facing strong political opposition in Congress from both parties, Vice President Biden and President Barack Obama each have suggested publicly that the president will act by executive order to restrict guns.

People are Buying Guns
and Ammunition for a Reason
American Thinker, by Neil Snyder    Original Article
Posted By: sagman- 12/25/2012 6:38:01 AM     Post Reply
It´s 2:00 a.m. You are at home in your bed sound asleep. Your wife is sleeping beside you, and your children are asleep in their rooms down the hall. The muffled sound of a window breaking interrupts your slumber. You´re groggy and you wonder if it was just a dream, so you lie there quietly and listen. A few seconds later, you hear other sounds.

How Romney Lost
National Review Online, by Kevin D. Williamson    Original Article
Posted By: sagman- 11/7/2012 6:28:13 AM     Post Reply
Columbus, Ohio — The realities of the electoral map meant that the Romney campaign really had no choice but to bet big on Ohio, and that bet was a loser. In addition to some critical on-the-ground specifics — Ohio is not hurting as badly as the rest of the country — there were three main reasons for that. 1. Ohio likes crony capitalism. The automotive bailout is popular in Ohio, and not just among self-interested workers and investors in that industry. Putting General Motors on federal life support is economically daft and morally dubious, but it gave the Obama administration a powerful tool for convincing

Obama's Loss: Inevitable for Years
American Thinker, by C. Edmund Wright    Original Article
Posted By: sagman- 11/1/2012 4:16:32 AM     Post Reply
Do not be seduced by the disproportionate emphasis on recent events with regard to Barack Obama's pending landslide loss. I submit that a more sober analysis indicates that November 2012 has been inevitable for at least four years. In some ways, it's been inevitable for even longer than that. You see, Barack Obama and his statist agenda have failed because they could not possibly succeed. In a way, electing Obama was liberal America's dash off a cliff -- and the 2012 election is merely the day they officially make contact with the ground.

Obama, Oy Vey! American Jews
Finally Have Had Enough
American Thinker, by Stella Paul    Original Article
Posted By: sagman- 10/18/2012 6:13:00 AM     Post Reply
"Two Jews, three opinions" goes the famous joke. And every day, more of those opinions turn pro-Romney, as American Jews increasingly reject the collapsing presidency of Barack Hussein Obama. Romney's surging poll numbers in the crucial state of Florida reflect his growing success with Bubbie Molly and her unemployed grandson Adam, who both thought their right hand would wither if it ever pulled the lever for a Republican. The signs and portents are everywhere, beginning with the special election of a Republican in Anthony Weiner's heavily Jewish, New York congressional district one year ago.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



The most shocking news
you won´t see in the MSM today

62 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Thomas Lifson    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/9/2013 11:49:09 AM     Post Reply
The murder trial of abortionist Kermit Gosnell largely is being ignored by the mainstream media, even in the face of grisly testimony, such as what we heard yesterday. Life News reports: ...a former employee described how she heard a baby scream during a live-birth abortion. Abortion clinic employee Sherry West described an incident which "really freaked (her) out" and related to the jury how she heard a child who was born alive following an abortion scream.

Obama says he´s ´determined
as ever´ for gun bill

60 replie(s)
Associated Press, by Nedra Pickler    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/8/2013 10:27:49 PM     Post Reply
HARTFORD, Conn. -- With time running out on the chance to pass gun control legislation, President Barack Obama on Monday warned Congress not to use delaying tactics against tighter regulations and told families of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting victims that he´s "determined as ever" to honor their children with tougher laws. Obama´s gun control proposals have run into resistance on Capitol Hill, leaving their fate in doubt. Efforts by Senate Democrats to reach compromise with Republicans over expanding required federal background checks have yet to yield an agreement, and conservatives were promising to try

White House: Planned GOP
gun filibuster cowardly

48 replie(s)
Washington Times, by Dave Boyer    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/8/2013 11:08:31 PM     Post Reply
Beginning a week of high pressure on gun control, the White House on Monday accused some Republican senators of cowardice for planning to filibuster gun legislation without allowing the full Senate to vote on President Obama’s initiatives. “If they oppose this legislation, have the courage to say so on the floor and vote no,” said White House press secretary Jay Carney. “Don’t block it. Don’t hide behind a procedural action to prevent a vote. That’s the wrong thing to do, and that’s how the president clearly feels.”

Obama enjoys ´sequester soul concert´
at White House amid massive budget
cuts and government worker furloughs

45 replie(s)
Business Insider, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/10/2013 4:24:28 AM     Post Reply
The sequester may have many across the country singing the blues, but for President Obama, it was all about Memphis Soul. Even with the threat of furloughs and government cuts sparked by the sequester, Obama took the time to enjoy a star-studded concert at the White House tonight. The White House celebration of Memphis Soul music in the East Room--which included special guest appearances by Queen Latifah and Justin Timberlake--is likely to rile Obama´s Republican foes. Some conservatives have called on Obama to give up golf, especially since popular public tours of the White House have been canceled because of

Obamacare architect Rockefeller:
It´s ´beyond comprehension´

44 replie(s)
Washington Examiner, by Paul Bedard    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/10/2013 7:17:19 AM     Post Reply
West Virginia Democratic Sen. Jay Rockefeller, one of the towering architects of Obamacare, on Tuesday openly criticized program managers for not moving quickly enough to build the system, warning that if it gets off to a bumpy start it will just get worse. Decrying the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act as way too complex, he warned the acting Medicare director that Obamacare is "so complicated and if it isn´t done right the first time, it will just simply get worse."

Obama: Put Nation´s 4-Year-Olds
in ‘Public Preschool;´ Will
Save on ‘Child-Care Costs´

38 replie(s)
Cybercast News Service, by Terence P. Jeffrey    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/10/2013 1:18:38 PM     Post Reply
In the message he issued along with his budget proposal on Wednesday morning, President Barack Obama said he wants to see 4-year-old children in the United States enrolled in public schools. Obama said America needs to start enrolling 4-year-olds to make sure the children are “better prepared for the demands of the global economy” and to help parents save on "child-care costs." After saying the United States needs to “equip our citizens with the skills and training” to fill jobs in manufacturing, energy and infrastructure, Obama said, “And that has to start at the earliest possible age.”

Obama´s Army Outmaneuvered by the NRA
35 replie(s)
NationalJournal, by Beth Rinehard    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 4/10/2013 7:18:37 AM     Post Reply
Although the first votes on gun -control legislation have yet to be cast, by some measures the National Rifle Association has already won. Obama’s ambitious plans to ban assault weapons and limit magazine capacities are off the table, while the NRA suggested it could support the most likely outcome -- expanded background checks -- as recently as 1999. The NRA claims that the president’s efforts have triggered a fundraising surge and boosted its membership from 4 million to nearly 5 million.

The World-Changing Margaret Thatcher
33 replie(s)
Wall Street Journal, by Paul Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/8/2013 8:21:53 PM     Post Reply
Margaret Thatcher had more impact on the world than any woman ruler since Catherine the Great of Russia. Not only did she turn around—decisively—the British economy in the 1980s, she also saw her methods copied in more than 50 countries. "Thatcherism" was the most popular and successful way of running a country in the last quarter of the 20th century and into the 21st. Her origins were humble. Born Oct. 13, 1925, she was the daughter of a grocer in the Lincolnshire town of Grantham. Alfred Roberts was no ordinary shopkeeper.

Poll: Obama underwater on
guns, immigration, deficit

30 replie(s)
Politico, by Donovan Slack    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/8/2013 10:17:29 PM     Post Reply
A new CNN/ORC International poll found President Obama´s overall approval rating has ticked up to 51 percent but ratings have fallen on his handling of the key issues on his agenda: immigration, guns, and the deficit. On immigration, 44 percent approve of the way he is handling the issue, down from 51 percent in January. At the same time, disapproval has jumped to 50 percent, up from 43 percent in January. On guns, 45 percent approve and 52 percent disapprove, the poll found. In January, 46 percent approved and 49 percent dispproved. And on the deficit, 38 percent approve

Sebelius: Implementing Obamacare
More ´Difficult´ Than Anticipated

30 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Tony Lee    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/10/2013 7:21:14 AM     Post Reply
Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Kathleen Sebelius conceded Monday that implementing the Affordable Care Act has been more complicated and frustrating than the Obama administration expected, largely due to Republicans who have opposed the law´s state-based exchanges and Medicaid expansion. "The politics has been relentless and that continues," Sebelius said. "There was some hope that once the Supreme Court ruled in July, and then once an election occurred there would be a sense that, ´This is the law of the land, let´s get on board, let´s make this work.´"

Ron Johnson’s JCPenney:
Anatomy of a Retail Failure

29 replie(s)
Yahoo! Finance, by Jeff Macke    Original Article
Posted By: athina- 4/9/2013 9:45:34 AM     Post Reply
In a stunning end to one of the most aggressively unsuccessful tenures in retail history, JCPenney (JCP) last night announced that CEO Ron Johnson would be leaving effective immediately. Myron Ullman, Johnson´s predecessor at JCPenney, takes office as CEO. When Johnson was initially wooed by JCPenney, it was to serve as CEO with Ullman as Chairman. In January 2012, Ullman was unceremoniously removed from the board. Gone with Ullman was any control the Board of Directors had over Ron Johnson and his control of JCPenney resources.
Headline corrected by Staff

CA Proposes Law to Force Insurance
to Cover Homosexual ´Infertility´

29 replie(s)
Breibart´s Big Government, by Breitbart News    Original Article
Posted By: athina- 4/9/2013 10:00:36 AM     Post Reply
The state of California is reportedly considering legislation that would force group insurance policies to provide infertility treatment for gay and lesbian couples. Two men who have sex with each other for a year and do not produce a baby would be considered “infertile” under the proposed legislation. So would two women having sex. Since biology does not allow those without a uterus to conceive or those without a penis to impregnate, every year-long gay couple in California would potentially be covered by this new provision of California law.


Post Reply   Close thread 711060





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS