A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC


   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


Why Obama Chose to Let
Them Die in Benghazi

American Thinker, by Karin McQuillan

Original Article

Posted By:DW626, 11/2/2012 5:16:15 AM

The burning question is why Obama didn't give orders to defend our consulate and American lives in Benghazi. The answer is becoming clearer each time President Obama and Secretary of Defense Panetta issue a denial or explanation of their inaction. To the president's surprise, he chanced on an honest reporter during a local interview on the campaign trail in Denver. On October 26, for the first time, Obama was asked directly about the explosive reports on CBS and Fox News, a week earlier

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: AisA, 11/2/2012 5:27:30 AM     (No. 8981433)

Must read. The truth is dripping out so so slowly indicative of the coverup all around.

Question?

Can we try a former pResident for Dereliction of Duty, Treason, or other such crimes after the election?


Accountability should be understood by the DemonRats even when not in office.

Take Back America on November 6 -- It is YOUR Duty!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Kurto, 11/2/2012 5:30:30 AM     (No. 8981435)

The backup squad was sent to the CIA 'Annex' from Tripoli. While manning the CIA 'Annex' they were ordered three times not to go to the Consulate. It was more important to protect the 'Annex', than to try to save lives at the Annex. So, what was so important at the CIA 'Annex?'

Gun running to terrorists, including Al Qaeda. Fast & Furious 2.0 on a very big scale.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Patchy groundfog, 11/2/2012 6:15:52 AM     (No. 8981477)

By Panetta's logic, a lifeguard would only save a drowning man after learning the details of how the man first entered the water.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Crosscut, 11/2/2012 6:56:26 AM     (No. 8981523)

Obama and Hillary have blood on their hands and should be held accountable. There has been no scandal or coverup comparable to this in all American history. It should not be allowed to go away.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Ephesians, 11/2/2012 7:39:30 AM     (No. 8981583)

My heart has been torn to shreds by this total betrayal of our brave and faithful soldiers. I may not like Obama, but he is my president, and he is the head of my country, and I take it so personally that he let our soldiers down. It is like we all did, and I keep seeing them in the fire, and under fire, and what they must have been feeling knowing, finally, that no one was coming. Oh my God in heaven, please bring the full truth to the forefront and bring justice to all who betrayed these men.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: thelmalou, 11/2/2012 7:41:22 AM     (No. 8981587)

Most excellent piece. Most excellent.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: squid, 11/2/2012 7:45:29 AM     (No. 8981597)

Obama voted "Present"

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: mythman, 11/2/2012 7:59:53 AM     (No. 8981622)

Dems want the Muslim campaign cash. They're going to sell us out for it. It's clear from the article a few up here on Pelosi. OMG. Why didn't I get this before?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 9 - Posted by: JackBurton, 11/2/2012 8:05:10 AM     (No. 8981634)

Just thinking aloud here but:

Americans tend to rally round a president who is defending us or fighting for us. If the Ambassador had been taken alive and he staged an operation to rescue him, would it have made a difference in the election? The polls? Why tell our people to stand down? Why (so obviously) put an ambassador in harm's way? Why refuse to defend him with even the meager forces that could be rallied on short notice? It's almost as if he was allowing the Ambassador to be taken.

And that would have set him up to be the hero.

Just thinking... This would have been a helluva a fourth quarter news story.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: NuGoddess, 11/2/2012 8:15:22 AM     (No. 8981648)

It does not matter why Obama chose to let them die; the fact remains that he did and that should be considered murder.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: Judith, 11/2/2012 8:34:28 AM     (No. 8981701)

When it comes to a decision, I will side with the muslims. Obama's famous saying just keeps echoing.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 12 - Posted by: Grambo, 11/2/2012 8:47:57 AM     (No. 8981728)

Just as he promised in his book, when the winds blew ill, Obama stood with Islam.

Damn him, and damn the Media who enable him.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: Haskell, 11/2/2012 8:55:34 AM     (No. 8981747)

Huge applause for reporter Kyle Clark of Denver who put the question to Obama. He showed more guts than the regulars who hang out in the White House briefing room each day.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 14 - Posted by: pigop, 11/2/2012 8:56:14 AM     (No. 8981750)

Obama knew all along way before this fatal day what was going on and made the decision - for political gain - not to intervene. it was more of a group think in the Whitehouse to use this rapidly developing "bad" situation as a means to their ends - Obama's re-election. Nothing more complicated than that.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 15 - Posted by: milwaukeeroad, 11/2/2012 8:56:26 AM     (No. 8981752)

Curious whether Barry (or Clinton)gave the silent nod to his companions in the Muslim Brotherhood to go ahead and TAKE the Consulate, but "just don't kill anybody in the process. Our media will do the rest for ya." The video was already determined to be the instigator ahead of time, right? No marine detachment was on site, 9/11 anniversary, and Stephens wasn't supposed to be there anyway. If kept quiet, the American public never finds out the truth. Appears like an innocently excuseable uprising caused by a YouTube film. (Spare me!) Sounds like a workable deal that, unfortunately for Barry, has gone bad. Our own Prez-o-dent was giving away the store and events went awry. Why else stand down the defense of the place? Brave souls fought back to defend the Consulate as 30 American lives were jeopardized. Again, just curious until we know more.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: geekrunner, 11/2/2012 9:04:36 AM     (No. 8981762)

Great piece, but Karin McQuillan misses the point I see. The Benghazi "consulate" was not a consulate. It was a clandestine CIA outpost running guns and weapons to Syrian rebels (co-opted by Al Quaeda). It used the idea of a "consulate" as it's cover. It wasn't defended because defending it would have blown it's cover, and forced the LSM to actually do it's job of reporting on it fairly. It would have blown the lid off the whole operation, exposing Obama's feckless foreign policy as incompetent and failed.

And also exposing Obama as the liar he is, right before election day.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: frankb4now, 11/2/2012 9:39:47 AM     (No. 8981869)

My take

Obama was taking Libyan weapons and supplying Al Quaeda in Syria through the CIA, the Ambassador was not in the loop on this deal. However, he did get wind of weapons transfers and was hot on the trail of this fiascal...He had to be silenced.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: BaseballFan, 11/2/2012 10:35:42 AM     (No. 8982024)

The Obamedia will never report on this.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: RaisedByBears, 11/2/2012 10:43:54 AM     (No. 8982054)

Socialism views people as a "mass." In a socialist state, "truth" is whatever benefits the state. Most Americans view people as individuals and a persons word as "true " or "false." Given that Obama is a Socialist, and not an American Socialist, but a Socialist with a world view, his actions are perfectly understandable. Ambassador Stevens, Ty Woods, and the other Americans who lost their lives - viewed through the prisim of socialist realthink, are only statistics.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 710109




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "DW626"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "DW626"



The Poverty Hoax
American Thinker, by John Dietrich    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 4/8/2014 7:54:23 AM     Post Reply
A major concern of progressives is their supposed interest in the fate of the poor. They purport to be the champions of the poor. But the truth is that they need the poor more than the poor need them, in a symbiotic relationship. As much as 75% of the money allocated to the poor is consumed by the vast bureaucracies that administer this aid. These agencies are actually job programs for college graduates who would often find it difficult to find employment in the private sector. The late William Raspberry wrote a column dealing with Gina, a 14 year old

State of Disunion
American Thinker, by Clarice Feldman    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 4/6/2014 6:09:11 AM     Post Reply
The clumsiness and incoherence, if not madness, of this administration’s foreign policies are creating havoc around the world. No one wrapped up the story of the chaos better than Sultan Knish did this week: When Bush left office at the end of his second term, the region was mostly stable aside from Iran’s nuclear program. By the time Obama had finished his first term, it was in a state of endless war. [snip] Bush had sought to stabilize the Middle East by removing Saddam. Obama instead destabilized it by trying to remove every government that was in any way friendly to the

   

 



 
Calling a Spade a ´Garden Implement´
Doesn´t Make it a Hoe
American Thinker, by Clarice Feldman    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 3/16/2014 5:09:00 AM     Post Reply
Early on in the Genesis chapter of the Bible much is made of Adam giving names to all living creatures. Like everything about the Bible, the meaning of this event is subject to many interpretations, the most often given is that it signals man’s dominion over the other creatures of the earth. I don’t dispute that reading, but to me, the naming description signifies that there can be no real communication among people unless the names we use mean the same thing to all of us. A spade certainly is a garden implement, but if you are in the gardening

Why Ukraine? Why Now?
American Thinker, by Mike Razar    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 3/14/2014 5:58:15 AM     Post Reply
The “I’m shocked, shocked” line from Casablanca is too much a cliché to carry any -- umm -- shock value, but surely it fits Putin’s actions against Ukraine. But the civilized world, mainly the Anglosphere, has long shown its utter indifference to human life by ignoring mass killings on a scale surpassed only by the Nazis and the Communists in the last century. More than a hundred thousand in Syria and still going on; perhaps a million or more in North Korea; millions in Africa, uncounted tens of thousands or more in Iran. The one place we intervened was Iraq, with

Well, I´ll Cry Tomorrow:
Medea, Debo Get No R-S-P-E-C-T
American Thinker, by Clarice Feldman    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 3/9/2014 7:36:58 AM     Post Reply
This week President Obama, following a long string of bloopers that the media underplays or ignores, spelled respect "R-S-P-E-C-T´". It was a fitting blunder in a week in which he and America´s left wing took a series of pratfalls.To start off, Medea Benjamin, master media manipulator and water carrier for countless leftist tyrants, winged into Cairo apparently to lend her inestimable support to the Moslem Brotherhood. The Egyptian government treated her less courteously than did the Democrat legislators who regularly let her and her pinko buddies disrupt Congressional hearings. In one instance her team, which had certainly been invited in by Democrats

Hollywood Continues to Flee
California at Alarming Rate
Variety, by Dave McNary    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 3/6/2014 4:48:18 PM     Post Reply
When Paul Audley took the job as president of FilmL.A. in late 2008, he was astounded to discover that physical production on the $70 million pic “Battle: Los Angeles” wasn’t being done in Los Angeles.“It stunned me that the movie was shooting in Louisiana, and that the state of California was letting this happen,” he recalls. In the subsequent five years, the situation has only worsened, despite the film production incentive program California enacted in 2009, which provides for $100 million a year in tax credits for what’s usually 20% of production costs. That’s significantly smaller than programs offered by other

CNN journalist admits Obama
racial double standard on air
American Thinker, by Thomas Lifson    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 2/28/2014 5:29:45 PM     Post Reply
Kudos to Don Lemon, the CNN journalist, for admitting what conservatives have maintained ever since Barack Obama became president with unquestioning media support and suppression of any conservatism as racist: (This is the totality of the text, video is enclosed.)

There Oughta Be a Law(yer)
American Thinker, by Clarice Feldman    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 2/16/2014 4:37:06 AM     Post Reply
Nothing better depicted Obama´s illegal tampering with the clear words of ObamaCare -- his announcement this week that he was delaying the employer mandate for medium-sized companies -- than Michael Ramirez´ brilliant cartoon showing the law as a blank page in which Obama had continually changed its words and meaning. Along similar lines, Charles Krauthammer observes: But generally speaking you get past the next election by changing your policies, by announcing new initiatives, but not by wantonly changing the law lawlessly. This is stuff you do in a banana republic. It´s as if the law is simply a blackboard on which Obama

Where Is the Red Line
of Impeachment?
American Thinker, by Cindy Simpson    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 2/15/2014 5:11:34 AM     Post Reply
In the business world, a diligent board of directors would have long ago fired CEO Obama. Sometimes it takes only a year of less than expected earnings to result in the termination of a corporate CEO. A couple of underperforming years and a few reasons more, and a CEO would have his bags packed and stowed underneath his buck-stopping desk. A long list of problems -- especially one suggesting even a hint of fraud -- that fails to generate a satisfactory board response would stir shareholders and lenders to demand the resignation of not only the CEO and other key employees,

Demonomics
American Thinker, by Clarice Feldman    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 2/9/2014 4:19:32 AM     Post Reply
This week the big story was the tag end of the old JournoList gang trying to spin gold out of the dross of the Congressional Budget Report. The CBO report projected that by 2021 under ObamaCare more than 2 million full-time workers will find it financially advisable to quit work entirely or switch to part-time jobs in order to get more subsidies for healthcare insurance. To most of us who studied real economics or just paid attention to human nature, subsidizing indolence means you´ll get more of it. But to the airheads on the left and their JournoList spinmasters -- the

The State of the Static Union
(and Universalist Claptrap)
American Thinker, by Clarice Feldman    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 2/2/2014 5:51:02 AM     Post Reply
This week to an ever-diminishing audience President Obama outlined a pedestrian plan for the remainder of this year, amidst the usual hornswoggle of invited guests in the gallery and dubious daytime TV style anecdotal stories of their lives. More popular than ever is the wish that we could return to State of the Union messages being delivered on paper to Congress. In the meantime my friend Ignatz, the genius Sultan Knish (Daniel Greenfield) and even Vladimir Putin offered up some sage observations which underscore the rot at the heart of the administration and his party and the likely consequences of their

Liberals Who Love Obama,
a 501(c)(4) for the
Age Of Gangsterism
American Thinker, by Clarice Feldman    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 1/26/2014 5:06:22 AM     Post Reply
Apart from me, there is only one other non-Democrat I know of in my immediate D.C. neighborhood. Let´s call him John Doe, because he´s petrified that he´ll be the next target of this extra-constitutional gang from Chicago and wouldn´t want to see his name made public. I hadn´t seen him around for a while, but yesterday afternoon there was a knock on the back door. No one ever uses it so I figured it was the gas meter reader, but no, it was John who scurried in, using the cover of the large fig tree branches out of fear he might



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Has Rush Limbaugh Finally
Reached the End Of The Road?

47 replie(s)
Forbes Magazine, by Rick Ungar    Original Article
Posted By: EveningStar- 4/16/2014 7:24:05 PM     Post Reply
Like him or hate him, there is no disputing that Rush Limbaugh’s very special brand of mixing right-wing politics with his flare for entertainment has produced one of the most successful radio programs in the medium’s long history. Whatever the burning political question of the day, millions of Americans have relished the opportunity to tune into Rush’s program, knowing that he would quickly take that hot potato, throw a few gallons of verbal kerosene into the mix and elevate the matter into a five alarm fire with a just a few well-chosen words spoken in the style only Rush Limbaugh could

Kim Novak responds to post-
Oscars ridicule: ‘I was bullied.’

47 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Soroya Nadia McDonald    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/18/2014 5:02:40 AM     Post Reply
After presenting at the Academy Awards this year, Kim Novak didn’t want to leave her house. The Hitchcock screen siren, 81, was too humiliated to venture from her home near the Rogue River in Oregon. She read the cruel posts and Internet snark about her appearance, and it was just too much. “It got to me like it gets kids and teenagers,” she told the Associated Press. The “Vertigo” actress, considered one of the great beauties in her day, posted a note on her Facebook wall Thursday, acknowledging that she’d gotten fat injections in her face and addressing her halted

Analysis: Obama Celebrates
Eight Million ´Enrollments,´
Again Declares Debate ´Over´

41 replie(s)
Townhall, by Guy Benson    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/17/2014 8:56:28 PM     Post Reply
President Obama addressed the White House press corps today, announcing that with the final numbers in, Obamacare´s exchanges have attracted eight million sign-ups -- 35 percent of whom are "under the age of 35," he said. Several elements of his comments were misleading: (1) At first blush, the 35 percent stat is both significant and impressive. As recently as last month, the share of "young invincibles" signing up for plans was struggling in the 25 percent range, far short of the actuarial target of nearly 40 percent. A leap into the mid-30´s, while still shy of the goal, would constitute a major step, and would bode well for the risk pools'

Michelle Obama Riverdances
Through Dublin to the Tune
of $7,921,638

40 replie(s)
Breitbart Big Peace, by Tom Fitton    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/17/2014 6:45:16 AM     Post Reply
When it comes to tracking the cost of Obama family vacations, there are two primary challenges. First, the Obamas are prolific jet-setters, so there are many details to track. Second, the Obama administration, clearly embarrassed by these lavish and frequent family vacations, stonewalls the release of records at every turn. But we have been relentless in pursuit of this information. Our attorneys file the lawsuits and make our case, and our investigators pour through pages of records and crunch the numbers. And the information we’ve uncovered – information that would otherwise remain under lock and key – shows that the

Why is US Senator Harry
Reid so concerned with
a local Nevada rancher?

39 replie(s)
Fox News, by Wayne Allyn Root    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/16/2014 9:37:12 PM     Post Reply
I live in Las Vegas. I live and breath Nevada politics. Something is very wrong. Something smells rotten in the Nevada desert. And Senator Harry Reid’s fingerprints are all over it. I am of course referring to the Bundy Ranch siege. This was a dispute between a Nevada ranching family with rights to the land in question for 140 years and the BLM (Bureayu of Land Management). The government claims they haven’t paid grazing fees for 20 years. The result was a government assault on the ranch- including snipers with assault rifles, SUV’s, helicopters, airplanes and over 200 heavily armed troops. No

The Folly Of The Bundy Ranch Rebellion
39 replie(s)
The Federalist, by Grace Olmstead    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/18/2014 4:21:46 AM     Post Reply
It’s the stuff of Westerns: a showdown on the desert plains, the big bad government against an underdog farmer. Though the story has only grabbed national headlines in the past several days, rancher Cliven Bundy has illegally grazed cattle on the Nevada land surrounding his farm for over 20 years. He hasn’t paid grazing fees since 1993, and refuses to renew the necessary grazing permit.(Snip)Rather than using the avenues and pathways presented to him, Bundy has staunchly declared his own law and allegiances. Unfortunately, reality doesn’t work this way. If only it did—we could rebel for paying stupid taxes, refuse to

Students Demand Acknowledgement of
Robert E. Lee´s ´Racist and Dishonorable Conduct´

37 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by AWR Hawkins    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/18/2014 12:35:28 PM     Post Reply
A group of seven multiracial Washington and Lee University (W&L) students are demanding the school remove all Confederate flags from campus and "acknowledge" General Robert E. Lee´s "dishonorable side." According to the Roanoke Times, "seven multiracial students, calling themselves ´The Committee,´" have also demanded the school "acknowledge and apologize for participating in chattel slavery." They want recognition of "Martin Luther King Jr. Day on the undergraduate campus" and an end to "neo-Confederates" marching across campus "to the Lee Chapel on Lee-Jackson Day." The students say they will "engage in civil disobedience" if their demands are not met by September 1st. They added: "The

Elizabeth Warren whines about coverage
of her fraudulent Indian claim

35 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Patrick Howley    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/16/2014 9:54:52 PM     Post Reply
Democratic Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren wrote in her forthcoming book that she was “hurt” and “angry” by 2012 reporting on her fraudulent claim to Native American heritage. “What really threw me, though, were the constant attacks from the other side,” Warren wrote in her book “A Fighting Chance.” “I would almost persuade myself that I was starting to get the hang of full-throttle campaigning and then — bam! Out of left field, the state Republican Party, or the Brown campaign, or some blogger, would launch a rocket at me,” Warren wrote, adding, ”I was stunned by the attacks.” This reporter (blogger?) reported extensively

Former US president joins
opposition to Keystone XL

33 replie(s)
Houston Chronicle, by Jennifer A. Dlouhy    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/16/2014 10:32:12 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON — Former President Jimmy Carter joined fellow Nobel laureates Wednesday in opposing Keystone XL, insisting that approving the pipeline would trigger “more climate upheaval” around the globe. In an open letter to President Barack Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry, Carter and the nine other Nobel Peace Prize winners bluntly warned the leaders: “Your decision on the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline will define your climate legacy.” The missive, published as an advertisement in Politico, represents the first time Carter has taken a position on the $5.4 billion project and makes him the first former president to come

Fox News Poll: Many voters say Obama lies
to the country on important matters

30 replie(s)
Fox News, by Dana Blanton    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/16/2014 7:39:27 PM     Post Reply
About six in ten American voters think Barack Obama lies to the country on important matters some or most of the time, according to a Fox News poll released Wednesday. Thirty-seven percent think Obama lies “most of the time,” while another 24 percent say he lies “some of the time.” Twenty percent of voters say “only now and then” and 15 percent “never.” Click here for the poll results. President Obama has been accused by political opponents and media fact-checkers alike of telling falsehoods. Frequently cited: His repeated claim that under Obamacare “If you like your plan, you can keep

Pelosi assists in Holy Week
foot-washing ritual

27 replie(s)
San Francisco Chronicle, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Harlowe- 4/18/2014 11:46:54 AM     Post Reply
To "honor the dignity and work of immigrants," Democratic House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi helps Bishop Marc Andrus wash the feet of two children Thursday at Saint John the Evangelist Episcopal Church in San Francisco. Pelosi also used the occasion to talk about passing HR15 - bipartisan immigration legislation that her office says would "reduce the deficit by nearly $1 trillion, secure our borders, unite our families, protect our workers and provide an earned pathway to citizenship." The Democratic leader´s ceremony coincides with Pope Francis´ similar ceremony in Rome to mark Holy Week.

Every Media Outlet: Hillary
Grandkid the Most Consequential
Baby Since Jesus

25 replie(s)
Mediaite, by Tina Nguyen    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/18/2014 10:34:40 AM     Post Reply
Less than 16 hours after Chelsea Clinton announced she was pregnant, a lot of major news outlets started staring into the crystal ball of Chelsea’s womb, wondering what this currently floating zygotic multicellular being meant for the prospects of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign, which is also a floating, zygotic, multicellular being. Their answer: The immaculately conceived Clinton child could mean everything. And no, it’s not just the fact that having a grandchild could be personally fulfilling to Hillary and Bill (mazel tov, by the way), or that a cute baby would be a sweet cherry on top of Hillary’s already

   

Post Reply   Close thread 710109





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google



© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS