A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy

































   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


It's Not Over
American Thinker, by William L. Gensert

Original Article

Posted By:magnante, 10/31/2012 7:31:50 AM

Does anyone believe that when Barack Obama loses on November 6, he will go quietly? This election is shaping up to be a landslide loss for the president, and by the ever-present look of desperation on his face, he knows it. The nation should be preparing for how he might react when it happens -- there is nothing more dangerous than a cornered god. (Snip) He may never have been more than a part-time president, but to expect him to give up the job easily or gracefully is to fall prey to wishful thinking. His monstrous ego will not allow any other course of action but to fight.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: GreatGreyhounds, 10/31/2012 7:34:24 AM     (No. 8976244)

I agree! 60+ days for Executive Orders, Pardons, and Decrees from On High could complete Our destruction...


Reply 2 - Posted by: Woodenleg, 10/31/2012 7:42:51 AM     (No. 8976254)

BO is a Marxist and he will react like all Marxists....he will use what power he has to prevent his successor from being effective and he will have his radical troops take to the streets.
Since these people believe they are the anointed, they will destroy.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: PChristopher, 10/31/2012 7:45:38 AM     (No. 8976259)

I would be very surprised if he goes quietly. Even if he does, his sycophants will not let it go, and I do not want to be downtown next week. I personally think he will pursue a scorched earth policy and lay waste to the country with as much legislation and executive orders as he can. Frankly, I think he should, at a minimum, be stripped of his presidential pension, however much that is, and his Secret Service protection...let his unions and black panthers protect him.


Reply 4 - Posted by: M2, 10/31/2012 7:50:34 AM     (No. 8976263)

If the GOP isn't ready for a black few months after this election, they should all be dismissed from office:

Is this a man we can trust to accept the verdict of the electorate? I would like to believe yes, but all the evidence points to no.

The Democrats are already lawyering up, you'd better believe it. They will claim voting-machine tampering, voter fraud, racism, "disenfranchisement", Sandy and anything else they can think of. It's going to get ugly unless some honorable Democrats, if any are left, stand up and say that Romney's win is legit.

OPEN LETTER TO GOP and the ACLJ: Are you ready? Dems are. You'd damn well better be at least as ready as they are.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Teleologicus, 10/31/2012 7:54:40 AM     (No. 8976268)

It's not just Obama, either. There is a big gang of backers, cronies, co-conspirators, accomplices, and assorted camp followers who stand to lose a lot if Obama gets the boot. This unsavory crew includes everybody from extreme Left ideologues to mega-business and high finance. Politics makes strange bedfellows. Then there are our friends in the mainstream(!) media and the liberal establishment. They have staked their all on re-electing Barack Obama. One cannot deny that they have done their best for him. They are not likely to be good losers. Altogether there are many people and interests whose careers, fortunes, plans, dreams, credibility, self-worth and reason for living are contingent upon the re-election of Barack Obama. It is hard to imagine them taking his defeat well.


Reply 6 - Posted by: doodah, 10/31/2012 8:03:08 AM     (No. 8976286)

I believe that there are enough good people who will literally "come out of the woodwork" to declare that the election was honest enough. Remember the Chick-fil-lay surprize, all those folks streaming out for the right thing to do. We have many loud liberals and leftards, but I believe the numbers are on our side. Chrissy might lose his show if he gets anymore obscene. And who watches the alphabets anymore?


Reply 7 - Posted by: ebgodard, 10/31/2012 8:05:42 AM     (No. 8976288)

It's true. Romney can not just win. He has to win by huge numbers so that no amount of lawyers, no court cases, no challenges can diminish the win. Every person must drag themselves to the polls, regardless of where they live- safe state or not. Rain, snow, sleet, hail, flooding or not. The popular vote must be OVERWHELMING. We have to combat the illegals and dead people voting; the bussing of Somalians who can't speak a word of English voting in Ohio.
We must combat their ground game of SEIU, ACORN and teachers unions. Let's roll!


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: overwrought conservative, 10/31/2012 8:05:43 AM     (No. 8976289)

When this bunch is finally out they will do more than take the W's off the keyboards.


Reply 9 - Posted by: revdeppisch316, 10/31/2012 8:07:53 AM     (No. 8976296)

Stop fretting-- what a bunch of wusses! A landslide will be the first media wake up-- then begins the re-education of the media who will want the majority who left them for Fox (and Friends) back-- so they will play it more down the middle.

Obama can do all he wants-- and each time he does something unpopular-- Romney will hold a press conference to declare yet another EO or Decree that will be undone in January.

Obama is not God-- God is God-- and if God ordains a Romney presidency-- God will not hamper our new president with things that cannot be changed for the better.

Stop wetting your beds!


Reply 10 - Posted by: Mass Minority, 10/31/2012 8:22:32 AM     (No. 8976316)

There is only one small silver lining to the corrupt manner in which the Won has denigrated his office.

That which was enacted by decree can be repealed by decree. Executive orders are not laws, they are decrees and only carry weight as long as either congress or the executive will tolerate them. Romney can undo much of the worst of Obamas imperial presidency before the inaugural ball, with no more than a pen and a couple sheets of paper.

Obamas "legacy", outside of the disastros obamacare bill, is a house of cards with no supporting legal foundation beyond his whim. Romney will be a fresh breeze from a finally opened window. The house of cards doesn't stand a chance.


Reply 11 - Posted by: steveW, 10/31/2012 8:36:44 AM     (No. 8976349)

Obama could demand that pregnant chads be recounted and that deadlines be shifted by the courts until a "favorable" number of Obama votes are, uh, found. Almost worked for Gore, and he wasn't even prosecuted for that blatant attempt at election fraud. Go for it, Barry. That, or martial law.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Catherine, 10/31/2012 8:44:19 AM     (No. 8976366)

I've worried about exactly this. Clinton went crazy during the voting period and when he had to leave the White House. I think we need to change the timing so that whoever wins takes office the next day, or sooner. If he loses, Obama has about 8 weeks to wreak havoc.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: Lawsy0, 10/31/2012 8:44:42 AM     (No. 8976367)

Even after he lands in Hawaii, he will still be a thorn in our collective side. As they say, he'll hang in there like a hair in a biscuit. The Clintons did. The Beltway is their life.

I've never gotten enough of either of the Prez Bushes and their classy family. Politics may have been in their blood, but they weren't obsessive about it.

Obama will do his very worst from Nov 7th until noon on Jan 20th. If you are just now praying for America, you are almost too late.


Reply 14 - Posted by: Holeymoses, 10/31/2012 8:46:37 AM     (No. 8976372)

WE can keep him busy worrying about his role in Bengahzi, Moochelle will be plaguing him wih domesic concerns about their Hawaiian move, and who knows what else will be discovered. I'm a thinkin he'll be glad to get out of there and start making some real money making anti -American speeches.


Reply 15 - Posted by: RedWhiteBlue, 10/31/2012 9:09:45 AM     (No. 8976417)

I know that the Pompass militant and racist Michelle will not go gently into the moving van and neither will Val Jarret!!!

I just feel sorry to the poor dog!!!! I hope he finds a good, loving home!


Reply 16 - Posted by: Illinois Resident, 10/31/2012 9:10:44 AM     (No. 8976422)

I agree with Mr. Gensert. Look at what happend with the "lame duck" legislature and the parting shot of Pelosi by passing ObamaCare! These delusional democrats have managed to put pre-set time bombs into law that will continue to explode and destroy this country and government for years to come. What will Obama do???? if he can't campaign for the rest of Novemeber, December, until January 20? If he starts talking to democrat legislators,for a change, we are in big trouble.


Reply 17 - Posted by: Arby, 10/31/2012 9:18:48 AM     (No. 8976440)

Someone should quietly mention the word 'impeachment' and the destruction of his 'legacy'. Sober 'im up.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: blizzard, 10/31/2012 9:21:54 AM     (No. 8976446)

I don't care who the loser of the election represents, they should NOT be allowed to give executive orders, and the like, once they have lost.


Reply 19 - Posted by: FormerDem, 10/31/2012 9:25:32 AM     (No. 8976451)

Yes, I agree. But, fine, that will be an opportunity to extend the damage he does to Democrats. They can be asked in public what they think of all he'll say and do, and his supporters will say and do. Down they go, unless they let go of him.


Reply 20 - Posted by: enuf8, 10/31/2012 9:26:08 AM     (No. 8976453)

Well, if he tries to sign more Executive Orders Congress can refuse to fund it or pass a law preventing it, or take it to Court. He may try to veto a law passed by Congress and then it would take 2/3's vote. But with Dingy Hairy in charge of the Senate----not funding sounds like the only alternative.


Reply 21 - Posted by: fed-up, 10/31/2012 9:30:07 AM     (No. 8976460)

Assuming the outcome of the election (I'm taking nothing for granted yet), I think the louse in chief's biggest problem will be to find out he isn't adorned by all those he thought. Unlike Clinton, who has enjoyed the fruits of his post presidency, Obama will not have the Hollywood crowd or even most liberals. You need no more than to look at those who have been stepped on to promote this hollow man. Where do you hear of any in Chicago that are shouting his wonderfulness? He burns bridges faster than terrorist burn flags. He will be left with no one, but Moochell and Axelgrease, and hopefully Stephanie pinnochio.

I hope I never have to hear from any of them again.


Reply 22 - Posted by: Deedo, 10/31/2012 9:35:28 AM     (No. 8976475)

Obama will take whatever billions are left in slush funds and distribute them to his buddies and himself during a lame-duck session.

It's all about the Benjamins.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: lasvegaslou, 10/31/2012 9:37:18 AM     (No. 8976481)

I hope you are all right but I worry. I remember Clinton's reelection campaign. I did not see how he could be reelected, even with a RINO cabbage like Dole leading the opposition. But he was.

In 2008, I could not understand how a total zero could be elected even with something like McCain running against him. He was.

I also remember all the elections that were flat-out stolen, Starting with Kennedy in 1960, up to Franken in 2010(?), the Governor's race in Washington,
where the courts finally concluded, after the Dem was sworn in, that election fraud did indeed occur but sorry, it's too late. The list goes on.

Somebody tell me not to worry.


Reply 24 - Posted by: woodsman, 10/31/2012 9:38:02 AM     (No. 8976484)

I have never understood why we wait two months after an election to pass the baton...It should be immediate with a week for the incumbent to move - Just like in the private sector


Reply 25 - Posted by: BeatleJeff, 10/31/2012 9:39:49 AM     (No. 8976489)

Let's not be such pessimists. On Day One all Mitt has to do do is declare all of Barry's EOs null and void and start issuing his own. The worst the Choomster can do is issue pardons to a bunch of radicals. He'll do that whatever the outcome, not much we can do about it. But anything else is reversable. Broken glass, People!


Reply 26 - Posted by: papasparky, 10/31/2012 9:45:05 AM     (No. 8976504)

Mike Huckabee faced a similar situation on a much smaller scale in 1996 when Governor Jim Guy Tucker would not vacate the office after resigning.

Tucker had been convicted of felonies in the White Water scandal involving the Clintons and their minions. The Arkansas Constitution forbids convicted felons from holding public office, so Tucker filed a formal resignation and then refused to leave when the ceremony to swear in Lt. Gov. Huckabee was set to commence.

The legislators in attendance for the ceremony threatened Tucker with immediate impeachment if he did not leave pronto.

IIRC, the Democrats controlled the Legislature at the time this soap opera was playing out.


Reply 27 - Posted by: Pepper Tree, 10/31/2012 9:46:13 AM     (No. 8976507)

Obama clearly sees himself beyond the law and may call for the prisons to be emptied onto America. What could be done to prevent it or undo it afterwards?

Imagine the chaos of over a million felons released onto our communities. Citizens would be forced to take up arms against criminals who would be able to blend in, at least superficially. Theft and murder would be rampant, and suspicion of everyone you don't know would become the norm.

If there are still a few responsible people in federal politics and government, they'd better be ready for something like this.


Reply 28 - Posted by: stablemoney, 10/31/2012 9:48:59 AM     (No. 8976512)

Obama is going and anything he tries is DOA. Obama is a lame duck. He will probably pardon all the blacks in jail. No matter they are repeat offenders and will be back within weeks.


Reply 29 - Posted by: iceman, 10/31/2012 9:49:27 AM     (No. 8976514)

Arm yourselves if you can. Cities will burn.


Reply 30 - Posted by: joeyinempirestate, 10/31/2012 9:49:54 AM     (No. 8976515)

The meme will be that he was too good for White America, so they spitefully cut him loose. I'm fine with that as long as he leaves with some dignity. I'll chip in for a golf tour fund where he can't hurt anyone but the gallery lining the fairway.


Reply 31 - Posted by: lftrn97, 10/31/2012 10:00:55 AM     (No. 8976548)

Please, please don't retain a single Washington-based employee hired during the past four years or any that had a referral from any Democratic member of Congress especially with nay connection to Dingy Harry and Pelosi.


Reply 32 - Posted by: stryker714, 10/31/2012 10:04:01 AM     (No. 8976554)

Yeah #9 is correct. There is nothing to fear but fear itself. The writing on the wall is obama will be a new benchmark of scorched earth. So be ready for anything.

A "deep throat" Obama insider interviewed on the sly, indicated the Chicago syndicate has big expectations from the majik mulatto, in the form of a second term. If he fails to deliver, the mierda is going to hit the fan.

Don't worry about martial law-think of it as a an open season chance to set things right. Then we won't have to worry about squashing follow up perks and protections.
The baby ruth finally flushes for good.

Just as the 2010 elections, the Wisconsin Gov recall, the Chick Fil A backlash, etc all blew up in their foolish faces, so will any attempt to retain power. The F&F was indeed an "under the radar" attempt to make sure he could stay in office by force. It failed as certainly he will fail. Ceaucescu redux.


Reply 33 - Posted by: trapper, 10/31/2012 10:12:04 AM     (No. 8976574)

OK, so it makes for a nice scary story on Halloween, but there's really not that much damage Obama can do, other than to throw open the prison gates with blanket pardons. Romney's transition team will be all over everything. He and his turnaround guys have dealt with disgruntled lame-duck management before. This is how it works:

The people at the top tier will all be looking for jobs, completely neglecting their duties. Any who DO decide to do damage will run up against the next rung down, the career government employees. Most of them won't jeopardize their own paychecks by participating in the mischief, so the orders and directives and shredding memos will just sit, unimplemented. Passive aggressive resistance. Nothing will get done. Most will be busy trying to figure out who to suck up to next, and the photocopiers will be much busier than the shredders as people frantically try to preserve evidence that it was all someone else's fault, and then cart it home for safe keeping.

And in all honesty, I don't think Obama really cares that much. He's a user, not a leader. I'm thinking he used the left just like he has used everyone else in his life. He knows he has some God awful ugly screaming sessions to look forward to from Michelle and Valerie, but then it's permanent vacation time. Woo hoo!


Reply 34 - Posted by: mc squared, 10/31/2012 10:17:18 AM     (No. 8976585)

#15, I just feel sorry to the poor dog!!!!

If he stays out of the kitchen he'll be OK.


Reply 35 - Posted by: Attercliffe, 10/31/2012 10:21:37 AM     (No. 8976594)

Perhaps Obama will take a leaf from Gordon Brown's playbook (he was the last Labour Prime Minister in the UK). Look at this Telegraph header just six days ago:

"Gordon Brown’s secret army could defeat the Coalition’s welfare and education reforms: Britain’s charities and quangos are now stuffed to the gunwales with Labour placemen"

In short, a sort of government in exile. For more, please see:

http://tinyurl.com/cstqbvc

It makes for scary reading.


Reply 36 - Posted by: RoosterBob, 10/31/2012 10:23:08 AM     (No. 8976599)

"Don't worry about martial law?" My question relates to Obama's EO to commandeer communications (including the internet) in the event of a "National Emergency." How do patriots become notified? Who organizes? How? Inquiring minds want to know.


Reply 37 - Posted by: joeyinempirestate, 10/31/2012 10:23:56 AM     (No. 8976603)

#33, from what I've read the Chicago crowd is resigned to the fact that he's history. Oprah will tell you as much, and she's not in mourning over this, either.


Reply 38 - Posted by: gwmcclintok, 10/31/2012 10:28:51 AM     (No. 8976616)

I do not believe that Michelle will spend one minute with O in Hawaii. She can't even stand to fly with the 'down low' boy.


Reply 39 - Posted by: Aunt Agnes, 10/31/2012 10:45:20 AM     (No. 8976663)

I think No. 34's assessment comes closest to reality. Not only is BO an opportunist & user, IMO he is still a drug user. I've seen people throw away professional careers just so they could continue being lazy, do-nothing junkies. Revenge & all of its manifestations takes work & planning. You can't concentrate on that when your next thought is getting high. I think he's looking forward to having nothing to do all day but stay high. He will have his pension & other monies socked away to do with as he pleases. Of course, he would use every opportunity to diss Amercia anytime an interviewer asks, but talking big is all he ever really does & takes no more effort than opening his mouth. The rest of the time, he basically plays.


Reply 40 - Posted by: choey, 10/31/2012 10:46:11 AM     (No. 8976667)

The EOs he implements can be swept away the day Romney takes office and he won't get congress to pass any meaningful legislation. I doubt that he's stupid enough to refuse to vacate the whitehouse. What worries me is that his czars will remain after he's gone. Romney needs to ferret them out and kick them to the curb before they can continue their destruction of America.


Reply 41 - Posted by: mickturn, 10/31/2012 10:47:16 AM     (No. 8976672)

We know they will steal the silver and furniture...but he will also leave a legacy of pardons for his cronie friends that stole all the money!


Reply 42 - Posted by: hurricanegirl, 10/31/2012 10:50:08 AM     (No. 8976681)

Warning! Warning! Fear porn galore!!!

Nonsense. Why would any Democrat let this bozo totally wreck their chances of winning any election for 30 years!

He may TRY some idiotic stuff, but it won't work!

Despite what we've been believing for four years, he's not all powerful! He's not God! He's a small small man!

So quit with the scare tactics already!


Reply 43 - Posted by: Hardright, 10/31/2012 10:52:55 AM     (No. 8976692)

Romney needs to fire ALL of the Obama people, ASAP! Unlike W. who let them stay on to do their dirty work. He also needs to do a sweep for all bugs. Obama and his people want to know what's going on in the government, even after they're gone. Don't doubt me. We're dealing with pure evil.


Reply 44 - Posted by: RancherJack, 10/31/2012 10:54:53 AM     (No. 8976700)

Duck and Cover


Reply 45 - Posted by: oh-heck, 10/31/2012 11:03:16 AM     (No. 8976728)

When Romney wins he needs to have a small team review every Obama executive orders and regulations. Most have been written without a legal review and restrict access of the People to something they previously could visit or use freely. The regulation frequently contain totally new substances that need to be regulated and at levels not created in the existing laws. Entirely new hazards, dramatically reduced standards, and rules that only affect some states, all need to originate in Congress.


Reply 46 - Posted by: trapper, 10/31/2012 11:08:38 AM     (No. 8976746)

Sorry, but just one more thought. I'm not even terribly worried about pardons. Other than Holder, Jarrett, some donors and MAYBE Biden, I can't even see Obama going out of his way to pardon anyone. When has he ever gone out of his way to help anyone in the past besides himself? He jettisons people when the going gets tough, and forgets all about them when he is finished using them. My guess? He's going to make himself scarce between election day and Romney's swearing in. And even if you do track him down, getting him to actually DO anything will be next to impossible.

Romney will, for all practical purposes, take over a week after the election, putting everything in place for him to sign into effect the day after his inauguration. Watch.


Reply 47 - Posted by: Lucky4, 10/31/2012 11:14:51 AM     (No. 8976769)

I disagree with this 100%. Obama did not like being President. Michelle did not like it.
They both love the celebrity lifestyle. They will move to Hawaii in the new home Penny Pritzker has bought for them. He will golf with his celebrity friends, hang out with Jay-Z and Beyonce. He is going to be off the scene. The most I see him doing is giving 100k fee lectures to the 1% he demonized.


Reply 48 - Posted by: robert28, 10/31/2012 11:17:38 AM     (No. 8976776)

People! If you have never prayed before it is time you started. My wife and I have been praying for over four years that God will forgive this nation and save it. And us. We feel that all of these terrible storms and earthquakes and fires are His way of getting our attention. Birth pains. Pray with all of your hearts. Please.


Reply 49 - Posted by: ScarletPimpernel, 10/31/2012 11:22:47 AM     (No. 8976789)

FTA: "This election is shaping up to be a landslide loss for the president, and by the ever-present look of desperation on his face, he knows it."

Many polls are showing a very tight race in certain states, with 0bama in a slight lead in some. And don't forget the Electoral College. So how is this shaping up to be a "landslide"? I hope and pray it is true, because Romney needs a large margin of victory to prevent any challenges, but right now I just do not see a "landslide".


Reply 50 - Posted by: fransand, 10/31/2012 11:35:42 AM     (No. 8976833)

Remember how popular Clinton was even up to the end of his presidency? On inauguration day he,in his hubris, set up a rally site at the airport to ride the wave. Well I was happy to note that even with his popularity and Gore's shenanigans, once inauguration day arrived, the press treated him as old news and moved on to Bush.


Reply 51 - Posted by: PoliticalJunky, 10/31/2012 11:45:14 AM     (No. 8976849)

What I foresee is not martial law but Obama's lawyers filing suit to restore the early voting days lost because of the storm. They will argue that the result is unfair to all those who have been unable to vote. This could be a long ordeal with the Democrats losing in court but forever after claiming that they were cheated as they do to this day re the Bush/Gore election. That claim must have some traction since the UN wants to send poll watchers here to be sure conservatives let liberals vote.


Reply 52 - Posted by: M Stuart, 10/31/2012 12:04:27 PM     (No. 8976904)

I also remember the Clintons' Long Goodbye!

I thought they'd never leave, and then the damage to the White House had to be fixed and the furnishings had to be counted. Didn't she have to return some of the White House furniture? Remember the Rodhams? Roger Clinton?

0bama will give out whatever goodies he has at his disposal. If he pardons Holder for the things he has done so far, Holder can still be held responsible for charges brought after the pardon, can't he? I hope so. I want him to pay for what he has done to this country.


Reply 53 - Posted by: Marzon, 10/31/2012 12:26:19 PM     (No. 8976959)

My biggest worry is that he will do nothing to stop sequestration and thereby push us into the financial abyss as payback for rejecting him. Bonus is that it will that much harder for a Romney admin to turn things around and he can count on the media to blame Romney for everything from day 1 of his administration, no matter what.


Reply 54 - Posted by: lencu255, 10/31/2012 12:40:08 PM     (No. 8976993)

#55 and others: let's pray, but don't forget to go out and vote.
And the other thing I am incessantly talking about: let's work to create conservative mainstream media. Let's demand from republicans the active measures to buy newspapers and local tv stations. Otherwise, Romney's win will be short lived. We know what the leftist will do in the media, in academia, in education, in local bureaucracy!
They will sabotage all our efforts.
Don't forget the simple fact - they tax us not to take our money and give it to the leeches and drones. They want it for themselves. Look how it is done in all leftist, radical dictatorships!


Reply 55 - Posted by: Butch59, 10/31/2012 12:59:29 PM     (No. 8977045)

I would not put it past Obozo to attempt to re-schedule next week's election, using Sandy as the cause. He will attempt to use the argument that so much infrastructure was damaged or destroyed that it made voting impossible in those areas affected by the storm. And I really don't know how the courts or the country would react to that. Giving the Dims past, I just don't put is past them attempting anything, no matter how outrageous.


Reply 56 - Posted by: MMC, 10/31/2012 1:21:40 PM     (No. 8977106)

Bill Clinton is campaigning in Minnesota....the only state Reagan didnt win.

What do these tea leaves say?

However much Obama doesnt want to be pResident, val jar does... Keep praying for Romney!


Reply 57 - Posted by: Nevadadad46, 10/31/2012 1:23:09 PM     (No. 8977110)

Knowing Øbama as I do, and believe me, I know him very well based on my life experiences dealing with people just like him and worse, he will cave and run. He can not stand criticism and will not be able to look anyone in the eye after his defeat. Yes, not just the bubble will burst but his own self image will erupt. Instead, his sycophants will surround him, try to rebuild him for the new role as overpaid university speaker, and then take him on the most extravagant vacation anyone has ever had. He will globe trot like Clinton did after the Monica disaster. He will avoid Americans like avoiding a severe case of STD. Too painful. Then, he will leave the WH in tatters, declaring complete ignorance of the vandalistic actions of his entourage, as Clinton did. And we can then close the filthy Øbama chapter in our history and begin to reclaim America. I'll pray every single day that God will grant us, as a people, the wisdom and courage to have learned from this bitter disaster. If history is any guide, I doubt very seriously that prayer vigil will be positively answered. People seldom learn from such mistakes. I cite the example of the Israelites and practically their entire history!


Reply 58 - Posted by: Photoonist, 10/31/2012 2:21:51 PM     (No. 8977214)

Any state within 10,000 votes will be challenged. If there aren't any or enough to make a difference within that range it will be within 100,000 or more. The Chicago Marxists won't go quietly and accusations of cheating from them have already started, though they are the ones with a record of cheating.


Reply 59 - Posted by: Bla Bla, 10/31/2012 2:27:01 PM     (No. 8977228)

#24 -- Don't worry! Prayer helps. I've been asking God to call on the journalists throughout our media to be true to their consciences & investigate & expose to the public what this administration is really doing.

And, because of how the media treated Palin & her chlidren, the public has less & less trust in them!

Don't ever forget this about Clinton: he won by less votes than Dukakis lost with. That's right! Ross Perot split the conservative vote in both of his election bids. Even when he quit the race "someone" convinced him to get back in. We have no 3rd party doing that in this election.

I don't know about Jack Kennedy, but our GOP congress better be watchdogs like no other election. If there is voter fraud, may it be exposed! I think, personally, that Obama is going to be beaten so bad that even voter fraud won't be enough to save him.


Reply 60 - Posted by: stealthy, 10/31/2012 2:29:34 PM     (No. 8977230)

We've got to stop taking it for granted that he will lose. It's really not over at all.


Reply 61 - Posted by: dman, 10/31/2012 5:00:12 PM     (No. 8977634)

First, let's all cross the finish line on November 6th. Take nothing for granted.

Second, President Romney will have much to do after 12-noon on January 20th, and may have carpal tunnel syndrome on January 21st after all the directives and executive orders he will sign.


Reply 62 - Posted by: vesicant, 10/31/2012 6:03:26 PM     (No. 8977811)

I was thinking about just this thing a few days ago. If scumbama refuses to leave the White House, who's authorized to use force to remove him -- the Secret Service? The FBI? The Capitol Police?


Reply 63 - Posted by: DoktorFranken, 10/31/2012 8:11:22 PM     (No. 8978087)

FTA: " If his claim is validated by sycophantic media minions, it could gain traction among the electorate."

IF?!?! Puh-lease!!

Here's one of the greatest worries an incoming Romney will have to face - a White House FULL of bugs and other data gathering devices planted by Barry's administration. Case in point - Exactly WHAT was that 2-year secret "remodeling" all about? There are NO visual differences.


Reply 64 - Posted by: Dodge Boy, 10/31/2012 8:12:47 PM     (No. 8978092)

This is the issue that concerns me now. Can we get Red Green to pay Obie a visit on the 7th and duck tape Obie's hands together so he can't sign anything for the next two and a half months?


Reply 65 - Posted by: DebiAnn, 10/31/2012 9:18:27 PM     (No. 8978266)

#64....President Romney removes him!!


Reply 66 - Posted by: hamrman, 10/31/2012 9:25:26 PM     (No. 8978287)

Scary...


Reply 67 - Posted by: bedub, 10/31/2012 10:15:29 PM     (No. 8978392)

Obama will do another world tour advising foreign leaders not to trust Romney. Then he'll play golf and ignore any emergencies that come up. Michelle will be busy relocating her kids to a private school in Hawaii, she'll have to find one where there is a gay sexual predator on staff, which may take some time. Obama's staffers, all 20-somethings with Women's Studies degrees and no real world experience, will be loading up their cars and moving into Mom and Dad's basement and filing for unemployment, and cancelling their subscriptions to the NY Times. The MSM will be trying to figure out how they can suck up to the new boss, who hopefully will be cleaning out the press room and filling it with objective, actual Journalists (there will be empty seats).


Reply 68 - Posted by: EagleJim, 10/31/2012 11:49:26 PM     (No. 8978531)

This was over-the-top for me, bordering on the ridiculous. Anyway, it was a fun read, just for the sport of it all.

It reminded me of back in 2008 when the Left put out articles about how Bush, if he lost the election, would declare himself a dictator instead of leaving office; and again, this year when the Right is putting out articles about Obama cancelling the election, declaring martial law, nullifying the election, etc., instead of leaving office.

I think a lot of people need to get a basic reality check and not let their imaginations and partisan desires run away with their minds.


Reply 69 - Posted by: ocjim, 11/1/2012 12:00:06 AM     (No. 8978544)

IMO, as a loser with 60 days left, he will stop at nothing. In fact he will compress and accelerate his goals. He wants to be revered by the Far Left. Whatever he does in the last 60 days will raise his stature for the future and I think his ego requires a significant future beyond his luxurious Hawaiian estate. Since he cannot get anything through the House, he will move immediately and aggressively via the enormous federal bureaucracy to quickly achieve his last ditch Leftist goals. Treaties are a special worry since treaties become law with only Senate approval required... Taylor-made for his post defeat situation. We'll need the help of still sane Dem Senators like Joe Manchin to put a stop to this. And it is possible that we all may have go to Washington to protest en masse the shocking things he'll try and do, and do with impunity prior to Jan 20. He will attempt to boil us frogs very quickly and we'll jump.
A lame duck Obama would be an Obama in full.


Reply 70 - Posted by: pensom2, 11/1/2012 1:02:50 AM     (No. 8978597)

Sorry, I'm not buying it. This article is overwrought. I'm with the poster who commented that Obie is a user, not a leader. He'll do whatever Valerie Jarrett tells him to do. I don't think even she will stick her neck out as far as everyone seems to worry. She'll make sure she picks up a few million dollars though some kind of kickback that she's likely already working on. And Obie will pardon some skunks, especially those who will promise to donate to his presidential library. But he won't pardon the "Blind Sheik." Then Obie & Mooch will get outta town with lots of silverware and furniture.



Post Reply   Close thread 709752




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "magnante"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "magnante"



Shaming the MSM on abortion
house of horrors blackout
American Thinker, by Thomas Lifson    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/12/2013 10:21:49 AM     Post Reply
The progressive media are deliberately ignoring the horrifying practices of Dr. Kenneth Gosnell, the Philadelphia abortionist who executed babies born live and is now on trial for murder. Mark Steyn does not mince words: "The U.S. media´s unanimous agreement to see no evil is sick and totalitarian." At this stage of media corruption, the only option we have in facing such evil is public shaming and ridicule. We must demand answers as to why they ignore such a compelling story, and when we get them, we must parse them and ridicule the self-serving rationalizations. They are whoring out their journalistic principles

Deifying the Dear Leader
American Thinker, by Daren Jonescu    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/12/2013 8:07:56 AM     Post Reply
For a clue as to what may be motivating the North Korean regime´s recent provocations, one need look no further than Kim Jong-Un´s American counterpart in the Dear Leader deification sweepstakes. Barack Obama is another man without meaningful accomplishments elevated to a leadership position for which he was utterly unprepared and unqualified. Just as the American political establishment and media made fools of themselves producing an illusion of significance around this most insignificant character, so North Korea must do the same for its chubby cherub-cum-demigod.

News that must be suppressed
American Thinker, by Thomas Lifson    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/11/2013 10:37:27 AM     Post Reply
If our major media were not fully committed propagandists, they would report the findings of a large scale survey of law enforcement personnel on the subject of further gun legislation. After all, they are currently following the President´s strategy of distracting the public from the awful state of the economy by exploiting the victims of Newtown to push for further erosion of Second Amendment rights. So the views of law enforcement personnel ought ot be of some interest. But of course the results are dramatic

The most shocking news
you won´t see in the MSM today
American Thinker, by Thomas Lifson    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/9/2013 11:49:09 AM     Post Reply
The murder trial of abortionist Kermit Gosnell largely is being ignored by the mainstream media, even in the face of grisly testimony, such as what we heard yesterday. Life News reports: ...a former employee described how she heard a baby scream during a live-birth abortion. Abortion clinic employee Sherry West described an incident which "really freaked (her) out" and related to the jury how she heard a child who was born alive following an abortion scream.

Corrupt federal prosecutors escape
even a slap on the hand
American Thinker, by Clarice Feldman    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/9/2013 7:47:46 AM     Post Reply
The prosecutors of Senator Ted Stevens who, by unethically hiding exculpatory evidence form him and other unprofessional conduct, got him removed from office in time to allow the Democrats to steam roll Obamacare through Congress, have now avoided even the most minor punishment for their acts

Same-Sex Marriage
and the NFL Gambit
American Thinker, by William Sullivan    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/9/2013 7:45:31 AM     Post Reply
What Americans say in public about same-sex marriage isn´t necessarily a good barometer of public opinion, because, if we´re going to be honest, there´s a huge discrepancy between the opinions that Americans express in polls and the opinions they express at the polls.(snip)It´s important for Americans to understand that the same-sex marriage campaign is about the disenfranchisement of dissenters, not empowerment. The protests, the social media memes, the entire agenda is about demonizing opponents of same-sex marriage

Definition Of Marriage;
What Can We Learn From Islam?
American Thinker, by Nonie Darwish    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/8/2013 3:57:29 PM     Post Reply
Before America embarks on changing the concept of marriage, I hope they will at least agree on examining cultures that do not define marriage as a covenant between one man and one woman. In their eagerness to achieve their goals, the pro gay marriage enthusiasts are marching towards what they perceive as progress and modernity while ignoring lessons from other cultures, history, basic human nature and the horrific and negative unintended consequences of redefining "marriage". Islam´s definition of marriage is one man and up to four women

Gay Marriage: Bill O´Reilly
Misses the Point
American Thinker, by Monte Kuligowski    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/8/2013 10:57:12 AM     Post Reply
During the highly publicized exchange between Bill O´Reilly and Laura Ingraham on gay marriage, O´Reilly made this statement: "There are Bible thumpers, and all they do is say, ´I object to gay marriage because God objects to it.´ You don´t win a policy debate in America with that." Really? Before central control out of Washington was imposed in 2003, policy arguments for criminalizing homosexual acts were won explicitly "with that." And because of "that," the idea of gay marriage has been unthinkable throughout the history of the American nation.

Jesse Jackson: Neighborhood
Watchman, Racial Profiler
American Thinker, by Jack Cashill    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/8/2013 8:36:50 AM     Post Reply
It had to pain the very reverend Jesse Jackson that when the Trayvon Martin story began to break nationally in mid-March 2012 he was on a pointless glad handing tour of Europe.(snip)As it happens, in 1991 Jackson bought a red brick mansion in a Washington, D.C. neighborhood that had seen its better days. Months after moving in, a burglar broke into the house and made off with some valuables while his mother-in-law was home alone. She heard him and then saw him run away.

By his own standards,
Obama is ´self-delusional´
American Thinker, by Thomas Lifson    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/6/2013 9:03:24 AM     Post Reply
It´s one thing for President Obama to be cocky and overstate his prowess at governing. People are used to politicians grabbing credit, and besides, you can always rationalize when it comes to explaining why things didn´t quite work out as you claimed they would - "the sequester ate my recovery" being the latest successful-enough example. But sports is something else. The basketball either goes through the hoop or it doesn´t. That´s why President Obama´s history of braggadocio regarding his prowess at hoops is having a potent effect on his overall public image, especially with those who are favorably inclined to him.

Gays for Sharia?
American Thinker, by Pamela Geller    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/5/2013 9:10:00 AM     Post Reply
Over at Salon, Chris Stedman, the Assistant Humanist Chaplain and the Values in Action Coordinator for the Humanist Community at Harvard, has published a vicious piece attacking me for calling attention to the persecution of gays under Islamic law. This comes just days after San Francisco´s Board of Supervisors unanimously passed a resolution condemning my ads standing up for gays. Stedman and the transgender head of the San Francisco Human Rights Commission, Theresa Sparks, could form a new organization: Gays for Sharia.

Barry butches up with
comment on California AG
American Thinker, by Thomas Lifson    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/5/2013 9:08:13 AM     Post Reply
During his two day flurry of fundraising in Northern California, the President of the United States took it upon himself (and allow to be released to the public - not all of his fundraising comments make it to the masses) to praise the attractiveness of Kamala Harris, California Attorney General (snip) The remark, predictably, generated a little of what Allahpundit called a ´Blue on blue food fight." I suspect that was the intention. The president´s image as a manly man took a beating when he missed 20 of 22 basketball shots, all recorded on video.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Newtown mom begs for gun
control in heartbreaking plea
during the President´s weekly
radio address, the first person
to deliver the statement other
than Obama or Biden since 2009

68 replie(s)
Associated Press, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/13/2013 11:41:39 AM     Post Reply
The mother of a 6-year-old boy killed in the Connecticut school shooting used the opportunity to fill in for President Barack Obama during the weekly radio and Internet address to make a personal plea from the White House for action to combat gun violence. ´Thousands of other families across the United States are also drowning in our grief,´ said Francine Wheeler, choking back tears in the address broadcast Saturday. ´Please help us do something before our tragedy becomes your tragedy.´ Ben Wheeler was among the 20 first-graders and six adults killed in the Dec. 14 attack

The Golf World Is Outraged That
Tiger Woods Didn´t Get Disqualified

57 replie(s)
Business Insider, by Tony Manfred    Original Article
Posted By: SoCalGal- 4/13/2013 1:56:27 PM     Post Reply
Pro golfers, golf writers, and TV commentators are up in arms that Tiger Woods was only given a 2-stroke penalty for his illegal drop on the 15th hole yesterday. Tiger said last night that he dropped his ball two yards behind his previous spot, clearly violating the rule that you must drop "as nearly as possible" to your original spot. Golf people are not happy about it. They say that the new rule is B.S. (or it´s at least being misinterpreted), and Tiger should DQ himself to save the integrity of the game.

From Dehumanizing Word
Games to Gosnell

50 replie(s)
National Review Online, by Andrew C. McCarthy    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/13/2013 6:07:01 AM     Post Reply
In Philadelphia, at a human abattoir on Lancaster Avenue, is where it ends, not where it starts. It starts with the perversion of language. It starts when the icons of a dissipated culture reduce a baby to a “fetus.” From there, Yeats’s blood-dimmed tide rolls rapidly in. Before long, a baby is not a person but a punishment, as President Barack Obama framed the matter in his familiar off-the-cuff iciness. Of course, to describe newborn children in their boundless possibilities and wonder would be to acknowledge, foremost, their humanity. That is why, instead, abortion enthusiasts must grope for words

Obamacare Architect: Affordable
Care Act ´Beyond Comprehension´

49 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Wynton Hall    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/12/2013 9:51:16 PM     Post Reply
Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-WV), one of the architects of the Affordable Care Act, said on Tuesday that the healthcare law, set to go into full effect in less than eight months, is “probably the most complex piece of legislation ever passed by the United States Congress” and “is just beyond comprehension.” Rockefeller said he is concerned that early missteps with implementing the healthcare overhaul may cascade into confusion and chaos. The law, said Rockefeller, is “so complicated and if it isn’t done right the first time, it will just simply get worse.” Rockefeller’s consternation echoes comments made earlier this

Philly Abortion Clinic
Workers Saw Few Options

44 replie(s)
Associated Press, by Maryclaire Dale    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/12/2013 7:28:32 PM     Post Reply
They say they were just doing what the boss trained them to do. But eight former employees of a run-down West Philadelphia abortion clinic now face prison time for the work they did for Dr. Kermit Gosnell. Three have pleaded guilty to third-degree murder. And Gosnell, 72, is on trial in the deaths of a patient and seven babies allegedly born alive. In testimony at the capital murder trial this past month, an unlicensed doctor and untrained aides described long, chaotic days at the clinic. They said they performed grueling, often gruesome work for little more than minimum wage,

Leaving Blue New York, Boo-Hoo
43 replie(s)
Irish Examiner USA, by Alicia Colon    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/12/2013 6:44:47 AM     Post Reply
Only one of my six children has left New York for economic reasons but the strain of living in this expensive nanny state is weighing heavy on my other five and their families. As a native New Yorker, I´ve seen its middle class population decline over the years due to its neglect of blue collar families which is ironic since this is a Democrat city. With the recent arrests of several local politicians for corruption perhaps New Yorkers will pay more attention to those they put in office. Given their past indifference in local elections this is highly unlikely.

The Decline of Obama
43 replie(s)
Weekly Standard, by Fred Barnes    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/13/2013 5:13:17 AM     Post Reply
With President Obama, there’s always a catch. In the 2014 budget he announced last week, Obama proposed a more accurate way of calculating the inflation rate for annual cost-of-living increases in Social Security. It’s a technical change in pursuit of honesty and good government. And if adopted, it would cause benefits to grow more slowly, though almost imperceptibly so. Republican leaders in Congress ought to be delighted since they had “championed”—Obama’s word—the idea in the first place. Then came the catch. The president’s price for adopting this gentle reform was hundreds of billions in new tax increases.

1,500 Page Immigration Bill to Drop
One Day Before Only Hearing?

41 replie(s)
Breitbart Big Government, by Matthew Boyle    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/13/2013 4:29:08 PM     Post Reply
According to an ABC News report, senators from the bipartisan “Gang of Eight” pushing immigration reform are expected to drop their bill, estimated at around 1,500 pages, on Tuesday, mere hours before the only scheduled Senate hearing on the topic. “A bipartisan group of senators plans to introduce its long-awaited immigration bill on Tuesday, Senate sources confirmed to ABC News,” Jim Avila and Jordan Fabian wrote on Friday. “Four Democrats and four Republicans, known as the ´Gang of Eight,´ wrapped up months of hard-fought negotiations this week and will put forth a bill that includes a pathway

Little Anthony Freemont´s
Twilight Zone is Our Reality

40 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Doug Mainwaring    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/12/2013 6:34:43 AM     Post Reply
Remember little Anthony Freemont, played by cute little Billy Mumy, in one of the "Twilight Zone´s" most famous episodes? In the opening sequence Rod Serling informs us: "A monster had arrived in the village. Just by using his mind, he took away the automobiles, the electricity, the machines -- because they displeased him -- and he moved an entire community back into the dark ages -- just by using his mind. . . . and the people there have to smile. They have to think happy thoughts and say happy things because once displeased, the monster can wish them into a cornfield

Boehner: I Don´t Need
GOP to Pass Gun Law...

32 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Ben Shapiro    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/12/2013 11:51:37 AM     Post Reply
On Thursday, in the midst of ongoing national debate over prospective gun control and comprehensive immigration legislation, House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) said that he didn’t need the approval of a majority of his own party to move forward with legislation. Referring to the so-called Hastert Rule, named after former House Speaker Denny Hastert (R-IL), which dictated that House leadership not bring up any bill for a vote without the support of a majority of the majority party, Boehner said, “Listen: It was never a rule to begin with.” Then, realizing the gravity of admitting

Thatcher thought Britain
was worth fighting for

31 replie(s)
Orange County Register (Ca), by Mark Steyn    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/12/2013 5:58:55 PM     Post Reply
A few hours after Margaret Thatcher´s death on Monday, the snarling deadbeats of the British underclass were gleefully rampaging through the streets of Brixton in South London, scaling the marquee of the local fleapit and hanging a banner announcing, "THE B@&$! IS DEAD." Amazingly, they managed to spell all four words correctly. By Friday, "Ding Dong! The Witch Is Dead," from "The Wizard of Oz," was the No. 1 download at Amazon UK. Mrs. Thatcher would have enjoyed all this. Her former speechwriter John O´Sullivan recalls how, some years after leaving office, she

Senate plan would make clogging
left lane a ticketable offense

31 replie(s)
Tampa Tribune, by Bill Cotterell    Original Article
Posted By: Hazymac- 4/13/2013 11:04:13 AM     Post Reply
TALLAHASSEE - Picture this: You´re in the left lane of the interstate, driving a little below the speed limit, when some guy zips up behind you and swerves past you on the right. Then you notice the blue lights flashing. You´re savoring the satisfaction of seeing a trooper actually nab an aggressive driver — until you realize it´s you he´s pulling over. This could happen, if not very often, under a major transportation package expected to be taken up in the Senate Appropriations Committee next week. Introduced by Sen. Jeff Brandes, a St. Petersburg Republican, the bill is a 173-page


Post Reply   Close thread 709752





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS