A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy

































   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


Why Is Obama so
Nasty and Vulgar?

PJ Media, by Michael Ledeen

Original Article

Posted By:Dreadnought, 10/29/2012 7:29:59 AM

Rude, insulting language about Romney (“bullsh****r) from the president. Vulgar sexual innuendo, aimed at seducing young women to vote for him. The vice president asking a bereaved parent about the size of his murdered son’s testicles. It’s quite a spectacle. We’re a fractious people, and our politics have always been full of colorful language, but I can’t recall the current depth of vulgarity. The “politics of personal destruction” have gotten uglier. Does it mean anything? Should we try to understand it? First, it bespeaks a coarsening of public language. No surprise there

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Standlow, 10/29/2012 7:36:44 AM     (No. 8970892)

Like Bill Clinton, Obama has no concept of dignity. Both men have a sense of being offended, but they don't have a natural gentleman inside, lacking father figures in their young lives. Obama is crude by nature. He himself has said he was a 'Jakarta street kid'. He has never left that beginning.


Reply 2 - Posted by: JAN, 10/29/2012 7:40:39 AM     (No. 8970900)

No honor, no integrity, no soul, no decency, just plain garbage.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Really?, 10/29/2012 7:43:12 AM     (No. 8970906)

No class.....some people do not have it. Sometimes it is understandable due to circumstances. Maybe this is one of those cases. In my opinion, Obama, Clinton, Nixon...all have diminished the Presidency each in their own way. There have probably been others.

Politics aside, I would like to see leadership in all areas, including dignified language. Oh...and Biden ? More pathetic than Obama. Just a foolish man.


Reply 4 - Posted by: zoidberg, 10/29/2012 7:48:10 AM     (No. 8970910)

LBJ had an actual father, and he was as coarse as they come.


Reply 5 - Posted by: ruready?, 10/29/2012 7:51:19 AM     (No. 8970914)

The more liberal, the more vial. Been that way for millenia. Take a look from the Bible

"These people are springs without water and mists driven by a storm. Blackest darkness is reserved for them. For they mouth empty, boastful words and, by appealing to the lustful desires of the flesh, they entice people who are just escaping from those who live in error. They promise them freedom, while they themselves are slaves of depravity..."


Reply 6 - Posted by: ruready?, 10/29/2012 7:53:08 AM     (No. 8970916)

The more liberal, the more vile

(sorry, guys)


Reply 7 - Posted by: Mai Bad, 10/29/2012 7:57:17 AM     (No. 8970924)

Yo...yo...That is so he can maintain his pimp "street creds" with his peeps!


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: msctex1, 10/29/2012 7:58:32 AM     (No. 8970928)

Vulgarity is to Depth as their Pragmatism is to Principle.

A substitute for something they can never have.


Reply 9 - Posted by: lakerman1, 10/29/2012 7:58:40 AM     (No. 8970929)

#3 Nixon is looking pretty good, in retrospect. He used vulgar language, but in private, not out on the campaign trail.


Reply 10 - Posted by: Northcross, 10/29/2012 7:59:29 AM     (No. 8970932)

A better question is how did we elect such a low class pretender into office to begin with.


Reply 11 - Posted by: StormCnter, 10/29/2012 8:02:01 AM     (No. 8970940)

Many people didn't realize what a thug Obama is until this campaign season and, most importantly, the third debate. He was exposed and the voters were appalled.


Reply 12 - Posted by: lonestarm3, 10/29/2012 8:05:02 AM     (No. 8970946)

Vulgarity, vocal, behavioral and political has been the hallmark of the Obama presidency. While we are on the subject lets not forget the infamous incident of the vice president of the US stage whisper to the president, live on coast-to-coast TV: "This is a Big F***ing Deal!" And instead of a public apology, the president responded with an only slightly suppressed version of his famous "joker smirk."

Then there is his "spiritual tutor" with "God D**M America from the pulpit of Obama's church of twenty years.

And his cute trick of laying the wrong finger beside his nose as a subtle "high five" to his base during speeches.

And dozens of others....


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: Nimby, 10/29/2012 8:11:11 AM     (No. 8970960)

One word to define O's campaign------ DESPERATION


Reply 14 - Posted by: Judith, 10/29/2012 8:13:46 AM     (No. 8970963)

Look at his upbringing. Look at the people he CHOSE to associate with as an adult. And consider the core of this man. The sad thing is this weak, stupid, immoral man appeals to almost half, if not more, of the voters in this country.


Reply 15 - Posted by: Teleologicus, 10/29/2012 8:22:50 AM     (No. 8970983)

Leftism is a kind of arrested emotional development that keeps victims stuck in adolescence, so it is no surprise they act, think and talk like grandiose, know it all, rebellious teenagers. Much of it is posing and posturing - an act intended to demonstrate independence and superiority to common conventions. Potty mouth is a mark of distinction, not something to be ashamed of. It proves one is no fool that he is righteous, that he is not afraid of transgressing the limits. Once upon a time it shocked and horrified the bourgeoisie. Now, of course, it is old hat. It is expected. And even when people who are supposed to be adults, e.g. the president &etc. use such language, we are only mildly surprised. We are used to it.

Profanity and vulgarity in speech, besides being markers for an immature world view, are highly correlated with impoverished thinking and a constricted working vocabulary. They are manifestations of mental laziness and carelessness, of a mind that is fundamentally undisciplined and subject to emotions. They usually connote a dogmatic, rigid, intolerant personality. And they represent bad manners and disrespect for others, particularly in the presence of strangers. They pollute discourse. It might be acceptable or funny to pass gas noisily and odiferously in the presence of one's friends - but to do so in public is boorish and juvenile, like Leftism itself.


Reply 16 - Posted by: athina, 10/29/2012 8:23:50 AM     (No. 8970985)

As the article says, it's the real Obama coming out. Remember him scratchig the side of his face while surreptitiously giving the finger, in 2008. That told me everything about him. Now, his vulgarity is not the slightest bit surreptitious.


Reply 17 - Posted by: JLoophole, 10/29/2012 8:26:37 AM     (No. 8970992)

Well, I guess when you're a naked emperor and your glass jaw and "marbles" are on display for the whole world to see, there's not much left. So you cuss, hoping that makes you look tougher.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: pinger, 10/29/2012 8:27:13 AM     (No. 8970995)

Obama is nasty and vulgar because those characters are molded into his DNA. When things are going well, those things bubble below the surface. When in trouble he has no choice but to let the real Obama surface. If his current opponent was Mother Teresa, his campaign and demeanor would be no different than it is with Gov. Romney today.


Reply 19 - Posted by: LZK, 10/29/2012 8:29:32 AM     (No. 8971000)

Personally speaking -- I'm happy his foul mouth and vulgar antics have been blasted upfront on the television...

What you see -- is what you get....

He's an angry, bitter, anti/american thug -- and his true color is showing.... (no pun intended)...

LZK


Reply 20 - Posted by: Malia2012, 10/29/2012 8:32:26 AM     (No. 8971011)

Amazing that so many people are "surprised and shocked" by the real obama coming out. He went to Church with Jeremiah Wright for more than 20 years, was a community organizer in Chicago and helped Acorn-criminals and unions plant roots in every state. WHAT is the surprise? He and his minions have ALWAYS been "rude, insulting, nasty and vulgar", the people who voted for this horrendous 'president' in 2008 just weren't paying attention. Nov. 6 is coming!


Reply 21 - Posted by: pineledger, 10/29/2012 8:34:26 AM     (No. 8971014)

This pair of lowlifes would not be allowed in my house.

Not long ago I had a dinner party for some friends and neighbors, and one man "pulled a Biden," complete with language and gross (arm) gestures. He has not been invited back and won't be, and we have declined their invitations.

It's up to each of us to draw the line.


Reply 22 - Posted by: texaspast, 10/29/2012 8:36:19 AM     (No. 8971019)

That's like asking why a skunk stinks - it's just what it do!


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: bpl40, 10/29/2012 8:47:03 AM     (No. 8971039)

Gentlemanlyness, courteous behavior toward others is looked upon as a hallmark of the established oppressive culture. Just like non-violence -'because they already have what you deserve and don't want you take it from them'. Vulgarity is a means of differentiating yourself and identifying with the victims. Its the essence of cool. Many of the positions on social issues - homosexuality, abortion, traditional role of women in a nuclear family, faith etc. are also driven by this. They will be vulgar because it is in their very nature as Left Wingers. This is not Liberalism. Hubert Humphrey, George McGovern, Daniel Patrick Moynihan were all Libersls.


Reply 24 - Posted by: GreatPlains, 10/29/2012 8:47:30 AM     (No. 8971040)

In some ways Obama reminds me of a feral child grown into an adult.
He exhibits zero manners or etiquette.
The first couple of months Brian Kneepad Williams had an hour special where he trailed Obama.
As they rode together in the back of the People's multimillion dollar presidential limo-
Obama put his shoes up on the seat.
During the ram through of Obamacare , I saw him body block Pelosi and shove her out of the way ,
so he could walk through a door first.
She was stunned at his rudeness and started looking around chagrined .
Obama wrote often in Dreams of his rage against whites and America.
Combine that with his bizarre upbringing , the early indoctrination into the culture of Marxism, pedophilia and Islam, the heavy drug use ,
the absence of a work ethic,
the lack of education and the NPD ( Narcissistic Personality Disorder ) and we have one perfect storm of an extremely dysfunctional POTUS.


Reply 25 - Posted by: sagman, 10/29/2012 8:49:05 AM     (No. 8971045)

Obama War Room: It's You and Me, Baby

OBAMA: OK, we got the Muslims; the generation ship welfarers; dead urban Democrats; the Greens, blacks, and browns; academics; the Mediscared; home-grown communists; Jews; gays; enfranchised illegals; Kos Kids living in their parents’ basements; and drug cartel members with dual citizenship.
DAVID PLOUFFE: We need another bloc.
JOE BIDEN: How about ''Sucker Moms''?
OBAMA: We've lost that demographic.
BIDEN: Not ''Soccer Moms,'' Chief — ''Sucker Moms.'' Single women who thought the boyfriend would stay around soon’s he found out there was a bâtard in the oven.
OBAMA: And you're proposing?
BIDEN: Declare, um, marital law, Boss. Or is it ''common-law''? Whatever. Then, issue a directive defining ''deserter'' as any civilian male AWOL from his family unit.
JANET NAPOLITANO: I could transfer to Washington personnel who are busy ignoring human trafficking on the border, sir. They’d team with FBI agents and MPs to track down deadbeat dads and return them to their home bases.
OBAMA: Not bad. What else to tempt these women?
BIDEN: We find language in ObamaCare guaranteeing 24/7 Supernanny coverage--contingent on your reelection.
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS: I'd throw in free tubal ligation. Insurance companies would be free to reject offering these benefits at their peril.
BIDEN: Oh, we better keep a lid on Iran attacking us in the Strait of Hormel.
JAY CARNEY: That’s the Strait of Hormuz. Hormel is an American company that makes Spam.
BIDEN: Why're they in the Strait? Betcha one of Romney’s companies outsourced operations there. We’ll say he’s still involved. We can sic the FCC on ‘em, too, Chief. Everybody’s always complainin’ about spam. You’d be the only one doin’ anything about it.
OBAMA: Joe, you’re going to be out of action with the flu until November 7.


Reply 26 - Posted by: saucy, 10/29/2012 8:59:42 AM     (No. 8971067)

Being surrounded by people like the Axe, slumlord ValGer and angry Moochelle certainly tells us who he is.


Reply 27 - Posted by: Linda Ann, 10/29/2012 9:01:33 AM     (No. 8971069)

Deleted racist comment. LCom Staff.


Reply 28 - Posted by: PoliticalJunky, 10/29/2012 9:02:01 AM     (No. 8971072)

When it was first reported that Obama "hates" Romney I was puzzled. I could understand Obama having a different philosophy but Romney doesn't seem like someone who would inspire hatredl. Then I realized that Obama is very conceited and wants to feel superior to everyone. He knows he is inferior to Romney in every way. To him that is unforgivable.


Reply 29 - Posted by: berlin, 10/29/2012 9:02:58 AM     (No. 8971075)

The descriptive that comes to mind here is ‘trailer trash’.


Reply 30 - Posted by: Dilettante, 10/29/2012 9:05:12 AM     (No. 8971079)

Because breeding always tells.


Reply 31 - Posted by: fire_mission, 10/29/2012 9:09:19 AM     (No. 8971089)

Upbringing plus #6 and #15.


Reply 32 - Posted by: 80coyotekate, 10/29/2012 9:12:05 AM     (No. 8971095)

Trucker Observation: #16

Obama is giving his base what they want. They are a vulgar lot. Libtards riot at any opportunity. Look at the rioting and property destruction caused in San Francisco last night after the World Series.


Reply 33 - Posted by: Hermoine, 10/29/2012 9:15:12 AM     (No. 8971108)

I'll agree with Ledeen on the vulgarity, but it's not new. JFK was a sex addict that we KNOW commanded young women to "service" some of his senior staff. LBJ was a mean, snarly, nasty man with very foul language. . .and we're all very familiar with Bill "put some ice on that" Clinton; not to mention the long list of Democrat Senators who played nasty in DC for years (led by Teddy, of course). Obama and Biden are just part and parcel of their gang of thugs.

The cleanest one out of the entire group was Jimmy Carter and that is because he came from completely outside the establishment. He's a bitter, petulant old man, but I don't think I could ever accuse him of vulgarity.


Reply 34 - Posted by: philemon1967, 10/29/2012 9:15:31 AM     (No. 8971109)

What is Alinsky's main thesis? It is basically that one can manipulate people so that power can be achieved and kept by those who are willing to flout society's natural boundaries.

The spirit within Obama, I would hazard a guess based on the fruit that falls from that tree, is not holy but something else altogether.


Reply 35 - Posted by: Arby, 10/29/2012 9:15:59 AM     (No. 8971111)

What does the poet say? Profanity is the attempt of the weak mind to express itself forcefully.

In Biden's case, the attempt of the empty mind.


Reply 36 - Posted by: Pepper Tree, 10/29/2012 9:18:05 AM     (No. 8971120)

"mediscared" is a keeper, #25.

Why's Barry so nasty and vulgar? Why do guys marry girls-next-door instead of seasoned lap dancers?

The answer is, so that their kids won't grow up to be Barack and Michelle Obamas.

If those photos published in porno mags are considered, you'd have to say Barry's mother would have been making grainy movies with a co-star who wore garters to hold up his socks and a half mask - if her father had known the producer of such films, that is.

His mother taught him his social boundaries and manners. That's why he's a lout today.


Reply 37 - Posted by: William1, 10/29/2012 9:19:48 AM     (No. 8971127)

Reminds me of an excellent comment from National Review years ago. The thrust was that the elites have failed to provide guidance to the lower classes in the area of social behavior. Nowadays, the elites get down in the gutter with the lowest levels of society.


Reply 38 - Posted by: Rumblehog, 10/29/2012 9:20:56 AM     (No. 8971133)

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the Democrats have become the American Communist Party.


Reply 39 - Posted by: GOP_U_BET, 10/29/2012 9:23:04 AM     (No. 8971139)

Because he was brought up by nasty and vulgar people. There are nude photos of his Mother on the Internet. His grandparents, particularly his Grandfather were party buddies with Frank Marshall Davis, who was a filthy degenrate mess.


Reply 40 - Posted by: Elvira, 10/29/2012 9:23:07 AM     (No. 8971140)

Oh Sagman, he who wields imaginative scenarios like a ninja wields his sword, if only my heart weren't so heavy with worry for our nation. I might then be able to enjoy your writings of fancy and wit this day as I always have in the past. Perhaps it is the dreary downpour here that makes my outlook so dour. Most likely it's a combination of both.


Reply 41 - Posted by: southernboy, 10/29/2012 9:27:27 AM     (No. 8971148)

#38 You are not wrong!


Reply 42 - Posted by: pomom, 10/29/2012 9:30:41 AM     (No. 8971155)

Obama thinks his position of power gives him the right to say or not to say anything he wants. He also thinks he can do anything he wants or not do it. I'll always remember the day he was caught saying ''I don't need this.''

He was placed in the position as President by the dark forces of evil, a complicit MSM, and by ill-informed voters. Now, he's having to do the hard work and he doesn't like it. His campaign is run by juveniles and he'll pay for it next week.


Reply 43 - Posted by: LadyVet, 10/29/2012 9:42:21 AM     (No. 8971186)

#25, the "Strait of Hormel" reminds me of the true story of the over-friendly waitress in a small Texas town who was serving breakfast to a customer she did not recognize as local. She asked his name and he responded, "Bart Starr." Then she asked what he did for a living. He said, "I'm with the Green Bay Packers." Her response was "Well, we get all our meat from Gooch."


Reply 44 - Posted by: Stopstoreload, 10/29/2012 9:52:41 AM     (No. 8971216)

Because tacky is forever


Reply 45 - Posted by: nerdowell, 10/29/2012 9:55:00 AM     (No. 8971223)

Presidents have always cussed in in private, I'd guess. They probably also occasionally or even frequently got a little drunk. They may have had dalliances or kept mistresses or misters even( Who knows or cares?)

The difference is that the press more or less kept their mouths shut out of respect for the office and personal privacy. Politicians, in return for that consideration, never flaunted their business.

Clinton brought sex to the Oval Office, but that was more symptom than cause: over the past few decades the line between private and public has eroded. At the same time we've enshrined a "right to privacy" in our legal and ethical codes we've seen both the extent of that private and public domains diminish. Private acts are routinely displayed in public and the increasingly voyeuristic public is entitled to know whatever secrets any celebrity may be trying to keep.

There is one proviso in this new understanding: we are not allowed to judge the person solely on the revelation alone. We can only condemn that person if a charge of hypocrisy can be sustained.

Welcome to the new error-- I mean, era.


Reply 46 - Posted by: J F Ackerman, 10/29/2012 9:57:44 AM     (No. 8971229)

More accurately: Why Are Democrats So Nasty and Vulgar? Democrats are the problem. It is almost 98% Democrat where I live and they are the nastiest, crudest, most self-absorbed, vile, and unhappy people one can imagine.


Reply 47 - Posted by: chicodon, 10/29/2012 10:01:03 AM     (No. 8971234)

My belief... Obama will not go down without a fight. He will challenge every close state and demand recounts. He will claim massive civil rights violations and file court actions. If he loses he may have to be forcibly removed. First and foremost he is an agitator.


Reply 48 - Posted by: Eheu Fugaces, 10/29/2012 10:08:55 AM     (No. 8971256)

Obama's vulgarity and nastiness reflect his lifelong dwelling within the Leftist stockade. This is common, everyday, acceptable behavior to Leftists. His base sees nothing wrong with it, and undoubtedly finds it [bleep]ing cool.


Reply 49 - Posted by: TCloud, 10/29/2012 10:11:18 AM     (No. 8971261)

Misery is their MOA! Personally, I am an eternal optimist and like to make things happen and live happily with the results...Peace.


Reply 50 - Posted by: Me?Opinionated?Nah!, 10/29/2012 10:27:27 AM     (No. 8971309)

Par for the “coarse!”

This thread contains mentions of a goodly number of low-class, no-class Democrats who, over the years, have lowered the level of propriety of our currently not so great nation. Ironically, first on the list is their party’s greatest superstar, Bill Clinton. I mean how ya gonna top what he did with and to history’s most famous intern? It was nothing if not internal. But, let’s not go there.

I can’t help but wonder if our Veep, Mr. Tactful Joe Biden ever inquired of his boss, the POTUS, what the size of his you-know-whats are, only to discover they’re commensurate with a couple of sesame seeds.

That alone answers a veritable plethora of questions, does it not?


Reply 51 - Posted by: mitzi, 10/29/2012 10:30:33 AM     (No. 8971320)

They speak that way so casually - it's just part of who they are, how they were reared, and who they associate with now.


Reply 52 - Posted by: chrisrenegar, 10/29/2012 10:41:01 AM     (No. 8971356)

Black culture is rife with vulgarity. Everyone else is supposed to laugh while we all look around at each other with dismay in our faces. This is the same garbage that scratches his face with the middle finger when thanking people like Clinton and McCain for a good campaign. No more lying kings in our white house, ever!


Reply 53 - Posted by: freightdog, 10/29/2012 10:41:36 AM     (No. 8971358)

The president's language and conduct doesn't say much for a Harvard education.


Reply 54 - Posted by: NotaBene, 10/29/2012 10:43:49 AM     (No. 8971375)

Eye candy is so School on Saturday - no class.


Reply 55 - Posted by: joeyinempirestate, 10/29/2012 10:44:53 AM     (No. 8971382)

Treat youself to a good laugh and youtube LBJ ordering Haggar slacks over the phone, this thread demands that you do.


Reply 56 - Posted by: Mayzie, 10/29/2012 10:46:31 AM     (No. 8971391)

Why does a dog lick his -----?

Because he can


Reply 57 - Posted by: mickturn, 10/29/2012 11:10:31 AM     (No. 8971477)

The answer is simple, he was brought up that way, to have zero respect for anyone or anything.

On top of that he's a LIB...and they, as a group, think they are smarter than everyone else so they have no respect for anyone else!

Time to put all of them in a Lib zoo for all of us to throw peanuts to!


Reply 58 - Posted by: leopardtwo, 10/29/2012 11:11:25 AM     (No. 8971483)

It has become increasingly clear that anyone who would choose Joe BiteMe as his VP cannot be completely sane.
Impeach.


Reply 59 - Posted by: Aunt Agnes, 10/29/2012 12:15:46 PM     (No. 8971711)

As other posters have noted - it is a lack of maturity. Libs are stuck in a time warp - they are forever young, rebellious teens flouting theirs parents & the rules of polite society. If the old, fuddy-duddies (parents) want you to be considerate of others & keep your language clean, then it is your "duty" as an in-your-face "rebel" to do the opposite. Nobody is going to tell you what to do! I've got one of these arrested-development-rebels in the family & becuase she hates her successful, church-going Republican father, she uses vulgar language to shock him and disrespect him.


Reply 60 - Posted by: Marilu, 10/29/2012 12:28:42 PM     (No. 8971778)

Luke 6:45 KJV
A good man out of the good treasure of his heart bringeth forth that which is good; and an evil man out of the evil treasure of his heart bringeth forth that which is evil: for of the abundance of the heart his mouth speaketh.


Reply 61 - Posted by: lencu255, 10/29/2012 12:30:02 PM     (No. 8971787)

I believe some of us already said that, but I haven't seen it and I will say it.
It is not that that the leftists (fascists, commies) are nasty. It is that nasty, miserable freaks become leftists (fascists, commies).
The more or less open bureaucrats in USSR shared with me the process how to get into the closed circle. The inner circle freaks vet them thoroughly in different circumstances, like mafia, grade them, and only the highest grade freaks have a go at higher rungs. Remember, how jarrett talked about van jones - they were following him for many years!


Reply 62 - Posted by: cmardh, 10/29/2012 1:06:11 PM     (No. 8971935)

Anybody remember that dark Inaugural Day of 1993? Bill and Hillary had opened up the White House (for the little people) and it turned into a logistic nightmare. Someone caught Hillary, on an open mike, chewing out Bill how they (well, him, probably) had just f***** the people. Over and over and over again. It's who they are.


Reply 63 - Posted by: Butch59, 10/29/2012 1:08:35 PM     (No. 8971943)

I vividly remember when I was a child and my mother heard me or one of my siblings say a "bad" word, she would literally wash our mouth with soap. Lesson learned.

I have actually heard Bob Blabbermouth on Fox New's The Five use the "F" on live TV. Of course he apologized for it, but you could see by his demeanor that he really didn't mean it. He just got caught.

And one problem with all of this profanity being used in our modern day is that most of us put up with it. I mean, when the last time when you heard someone use profanity in public, did you step forward and politely ask that person NOT to use language like that in public? If not, then you have acquiesced to that type of language. Even here at LCom, there is a code of speech and use of language that if you violate it, you get barred. We can can and should do that in our everyday lives.


Reply 64 - Posted by: sagman, 10/29/2012 1:11:02 PM     (No. 8971950)

You know, #40 (Elvira) has a point.

Obama and the left pose a dire threat to our liberty, and up until now one way I've been able to keep my sanity while watching this man sully the presidency and undermine the Constitution is to mock him and his acolytes. Conventional wisdom is that ridicule diminishes such people.

But this administration is immune to ridicule. I can't tell you how many far-out scenarios I've posited in my satires over the last four years that have actually come to pass.

The time for jokes about the poseur in the Oval Office is over. In fact, though I persisted in trying to skewer him, his defilement of the presidency made me wonder more than once whether finding amusement in his actions served any purpose.

I'm not laughing at Obama any more ... just loathing him. No more jokes until, well, at least until he's defeated and I can get the disdain level dialed down. We're way beyond parody with this guy.


Reply 65 - Posted by: redwhite&blue2, 10/29/2012 1:58:16 PM     (No. 8972131)

He's not one of us..he's never been one of us. I grew up an All-American kid, loved baseball, the Air Force, fast cars, my country, my family....He's not like me. He likes pimp rap, Muslim brotherhoods, talk shows, and he loves to lie. He's deceptive, he's sinister, he's vulgar, he's so often mistaken(Navy CORPSEman, 57 states, my Muslim faith, I'll balance the budget, I'll close Gitmo, the You Tube Libya LIES)...Whatever hallucinatory TRANCE the idiots who voted for him in 2008 were under, it's ALL OVER! Bye Bye Barry "Stinky" Soetoro, and take that obscene demented idiot liar Bite Me Biden with ya!

Romney/Ryan on Nov. 6th !


Reply 66 - Posted by: Safari Man, 10/29/2012 2:00:18 PM     (No. 8972142)

Nearly half our country is just as bad.


Reply 67 - Posted by: Lawsy0, 10/29/2012 2:09:21 PM     (No. 8972179)

If either Obama or Biden were kids in our neighborhood, Mom would never have let us play with them. We probably would have invited them to church, however.


Reply 68 - Posted by: scarface67, 10/29/2012 2:21:23 PM     (No. 8972224)


Just being himself while trying to appeal to his base.



Reply 69 - Posted by: cheeflo, 10/29/2012 2:33:40 PM     (No. 8972283)

I dunno, #3 -- he has lots of class. All of it very, very low.


Reply 70 - Posted by: Photoonist, 10/29/2012 2:35:35 PM     (No. 8972295)

'Indeed, as we now see, he’s a bum.'' - article. 0bama is a community agitator and a psychotic malignant narcissist. I'm a bit surprised only in that he's not prone to acts of violence in public, but give him time and a big electoral defeat.


Reply 71 - Posted by: manofparadise, 10/29/2012 3:30:49 PM     (No. 8972518)

I've posted this message with Lucianne on various articles for the past 8 months. I'll repeat it one more time, because the election is near.

Mitt 55%
Obama 44%


Reply 72 - Posted by: jdmii, 10/29/2012 3:36:56 PM     (No. 8972540)

It is in the genes and the jeans.


Reply 73 - Posted by: M2, 10/29/2012 4:10:47 PM     (No. 8972635)

He's a narcissistic affirmative-action Marxist liberal Democrat who grew up with pigs like Bill Ayers, Bernadine Dohrn, Jeremiah Wright, Saul Alinsky and potheads from his own generation and others. What else is there you need to know to answer the question why he's vulgar and nasty?


Reply 74 - Posted by: TruthandJustice, 10/29/2012 4:34:24 PM     (No. 8972714)

Men who lie and cheat...and have twisted perverted nasty secrets in their closet ...have no business heading an administration...Holds true for Affirmative Action Narcissistic Communists too.


Reply 75 - Posted by: 4Justice, 10/29/2012 5:39:36 PM     (No. 8972904)

Leftists arw always vulgar and immature. That is why they are leftists...they are constantly looking for immediate self-gratification (usually at the expense of others). That's why they are also controlling tyrants.

#7 & #27 -- I find your turning this into a racial issue very disturbing and off color. Conservatives do not judge people on irrelevant characteristics like race or skin color--that is what leftists do. We see people as individuals who should be judged thier individual character. Let's continue to take the high road, eh?


Reply 76 - Posted by: SoSensible, 10/29/2012 5:45:09 PM     (No. 8972922)

My Dream

Someday, all of Sagman's Lucianne posts will be gathered together and offered as the incentive for donations to the site. Of course, Sagman will receive a generous cut. Thank you, as always for your cleverness.


Reply 77 - Posted by: sagman, 10/29/2012 6:30:47 PM     (No. 8973055)

My promise:

At some point, when my muse no longer sings to me (and her voice has been growing faint of late), I'll set up a blog and stuff it with everything humorous I've done here at Lucianne's and as a contributor at Breitbart's sites for two years.

The only thing I'll ask is that people continue to support lucianne.com, a beacon of sanity in the maelstrom of political discussion on the internet.


Reply 78 - Posted by: Dodge Boy, 10/29/2012 8:09:16 PM     (No. 8973296)

I just got home from work and don't know where to start with this one. All the posters ahead of me understand. And #25.


Reply 79 - Posted by: Tasine, 10/29/2012 8:36:12 PM     (No. 8973370)


Reply 80 - Posted by: LC Hoghead, 10/29/2012 8:39:09 PM     (No. 8973378)

WASHINGTON – Using a Pakistani Internet Protocol, or IP address, a disposable credit card and a fake address, “Osama bin Laden” has successfully donated twice to Barack Obama’s presidential re-election campaign.

The “Bin Laden” donations, actually made by WND staff, included a listed occupation of “deceased terror chief” and a stated employer of “al-Qaida.”

“Bin Laden” is currently set up on the official campaign website to contribute more to Obama’s campaign. The name is also registered as a volunteer.

Since the “foreign” contribution was sent, “Bin Laden’s” email address has received several solicitations from Obama’s campaign asking for more donations.

The acceptance of foreign contributions is strictly illegal under U.S. campaign finance law.

One $15 donation was made at BarackObama.com using a confirmed Pakistani IP address. In other words, as far as the campaign website was concerned, the donation was openly identified electronically as coming from Pakistan.

Upon clicking the “donate” button, WND staff selected the $15 amount and were taken to a page on the campaign website asking for a first and last name, city, state, zip code, email address and phone number.

The information submitted was: “Osama bin Laden, 911 Jihad Way, Abbottabad, CA 91101.”

While the website only has options for U.S. states and zip codes, there is no mechanism in place on Obama’s website to verify the individual is actually located in that state or zip code, or even in the U.S.

The Obama campaign refuses to release the identification of donors who give less than $200

In the case of this donation, the 91101 zip code is real but corresponds to Pasadena, Calif., and not Abbottabad, the Pakistani city in which bin Laden was found holed up in a compound.

For a requested phone number, WND inputted the White House information line of (202) 456-2121.

The email address used to set up the donation account was osama4obama2012@gmail.com.




Reply 81 - Posted by: Cor-vet, 10/29/2012 8:52:30 PM     (No. 8973398)

You'd be nasty and vulgar too, if you had to go home to the Mooch every night!


Reply 82 - Posted by: zapper1979, 10/29/2012 9:09:28 PM     (No. 8973428)

All of the low information voters who elected this scum thought they were getting "clean and articulate". Instead they got a thugrat on the DL.


Reply 83 - Posted by: Penney, 10/29/2012 9:28:23 PM     (No. 8973467)

''Why...?!' ...It's what dem pols' do. They have NO SHAME.


Reply 84 - Posted by: owl, 10/29/2012 9:32:30 PM     (No. 8973478)

Ah , who really cares . Just two more adjectives to add to the already lengthy list . As one poster noted , our countries disintegrating moral fiber could have as much to with it as anything . Look at how popular he ( as well as Clinton ) still is . America actually voted and put him in office without a shred of scrutiny . American Idol nation is one sorry state od affairs .


Reply 85 - Posted by: ColonialAmerican1623, 10/29/2012 10:54:06 PM     (No. 8973633)

Ghetto trash all dressed up and pimped.
Vulgarity is used by ignorant people.
Guess when you have a fake diploma, you don't learn the finer points of an ivy league education. Maybe he learned some 'stuff' from JayZ.


Reply 86 - Posted by: larryp, 10/30/2012 12:23:10 AM     (No. 8973738)

Recall "Doo-Dad Pro". That was the donor to Obama from Gaza in the '08 election. Many computer experts on the 'net told them: 'your security is turned off.' and told them how to re-estblish it. But they were not interested and wanted the dough.
For the insults of Obama , Paul Rahe of Hillsdale College wrote an article on it. It was called "the Insulting Gestures of Obama", similar to that, posted on
powerlineblog.com
It might be in their archives.
Recall he gave the finger to both M'Cain and Hilary. The audience-morons laughed and both were thrown off the stride and focus.
He gave someone the finger this weekend by rubbing his eye with his middle finger.


Reply 87 - Posted by: MSD78, 10/30/2012 10:59:00 AM     (No. 8974470)

#1 and #2: Well you have the reason.


Reply 88 - Posted by: MSD78, 10/30/2012 11:14:17 AM     (No. 8974502)

Maybe this video can prove what a "brother" says about him. It's worth looking at, it hits right at home... let any liberal accuse conservatives of racism and here you have it from a man who's black and who says it as it is..he's no intellectual but he's not blind-sided by the lies and the bunkum of the media and the president's campaign.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2933126/posts



Post Reply   Close thread 709365




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"



Maryland girl is armed with
arguments against gun control
Washington Times, by David Sherfinski    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/7/2013 11:26:36 PM     Post Reply
A three-minute video of Sarah Merkle’s testimony about Maryland’s new gun legislation has drawn more than 2 million views on YouTube, won her praise from gun rights advocates across the country and even scored her an interview on national television last week. But the 15-year-old from Baltimore said she cares more about her message. “The biggest part of this is that the pro-gun, Second Amendment argument is getting publicity,” she said. “I like that it actually got out there, and not just because it’s me, but because it’s the argument.”

Filibuster gains support to
delay gun control vote
Washington Times, by David Sherfinski    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/7/2013 11:25:18 PM     Post Reply
A growing number of senators are trying to quash gun legislation before it even hits the chamber floor as Democrats hold out hope for a compromise and the White House gears up for a weeklong offensive to pressure Congress to act. Larry Pratt, executive director of Gun Owners of America, said as many as 13 senators now publicly support a filibuster on the motion to proceed on pending gun legislation, which effectively would block debate on the bill. “When you’re in a snake pit, you kill a snake any time and chance that you get,”

White House looks to salvage
gun-control legislation
Washington Times, by Tim Devaney    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/7/2013 11:22:42 PM     Post Reply
The Obama administration took to the airwaves Sunday morning to call on Republicans to back the president’s plan for gun control. In interviews on “Fox News Sunday” and ABC’s “This Week,”Dan Pfeiffer, a senior White House adviser, pointed out that 90 percent of Americans support President Obama’s plan to expand background checks on citizens who purchase guns, and he pressured Republicans to get on board with what he said where “common-sense measures.” “You can’t get 90 percent of Americans to agree on the weather,” Mr. Pfeiffer said on “Fox News Sunday.” Mr. Pfeiffer warned that a potential Republican filibuster

Bipartisan unity on North Korea:
Republicans praise Obama’s
handling of threat
Washington Times, by Guy Taylor    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/7/2013 11:20:32 PM     Post Reply
President Obama won rare foreign policy praise from Republicans for his administration’s handling of the North Korea crisis, as China signaled a possible readiness to play a more active role in pressuring Pyongyang away from provoking a military conflict. Two influential Republicans commended the White House on separate news talk shows Sunday for striking an effective balance by allowing senior Cabinet members to issue cautionary remarks in response to North Korea, while also strategically adjusting the U.S. military posture in the region. “This administration’s acted responsibly,” said Sen. Lindsey Graham

Senate has become more
partisan, less collegial —
more like the House
Washington Post, by Chris Cillizza    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/7/2013 11:17:33 PM     Post Reply
The world’s greatest deliberative body has started to look a lot like its legislative little brother over the past few years. The Senate was once regarded as the home of the great political orators of the time — not to mention the body where true dealmaking actually took place. Its members prided themselves on their cool approach to legislating, in contrast with the more brawling nature of the House. Senators, generally, liked one another — no matter their party — and weren’t afraid to show it, either personally or politically. No longer. The Senate has undergone a marked transformation

Gun legislation’s prospects improve
Washington Post, by Ed O´Keefe and Philip Rucker    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/7/2013 11:14:37 PM     Post Reply
Prospects for a bipartisan deal to expand federal background checks for gun purchases are improving with the emergence of fresh Republican support, according to top Senate aides. The possibility that after weeks of stalled negotiations senators might be on the cusp of a breakthrough comes as President Obama and his top surrogates will begin on Monday their most aggressive push yet to rally Americans around his gun-control agenda. Even though polls show that a universal background-check system is supported by nine in 10 Americans, the president has been unable to translate popular support

An act of political malpractice
Washington Post, by Ruth Marcus    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/7/2013 11:12:28 PM     Post Reply
On the matter of the president and Kamala Harris, I could go either way. I could write a column — call it Classic Feminist High Dudgeon — lamenting the president’s comments about the California attorney general’s good looks. This column would discuss the continuing, albeit more subtle, discrimination against women in the workplace. It would explain how, even if unintentionally, Obama’s reference to Harris’s attractiveness is demeaning — that it serves, in the apologetic words of White House press secretary Jay Carney, “to diminish the attorney general’s professional accomplishments and her capabilities.” It would, inevitably, invoke the president’s daughters

Democrats push problem
solvers in House contests
Washington Post, by Paul Kane    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:38:26 PM     Post Reply
Democratic Party officials believe that Kevin Strouse is exactly the kind of candidate who can help them retake the House next year. He’s a smart, young former Army Ranger — good qualities for any aspiring politician. But what party leaders really like is that Strouse doesn’t have particularly strong views on the country’s hottest issues. Immigration? Tax policy? “Certainly I have a lot of research to do,” Strouse acknowledged in an interview Thursday as he announced his candidacy in a suburban Philadelphia House district. Strouse’s candidacy reflects an emerging

Texas prosecutors’ slayings
unnerve rural Kaufman County
Washington Post, by Stephanie McCrummen    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:33:08 PM     Post Reply
KAUFMAN, Tex. — The judge was on the phone. “Yep, I said I’ll do anything,” Bruce Wood told the person on the other end, rubbing his forehead. “They asked me to do a eulogy. I don’t know what I’m going to say.” Elsewhere in the Kaufman County Courthouse, a sheriff’s deputy was handing out bulletproof vests. “I brought the smallest one,” he said to a secretary, who stared at the khaki armor as he explained how to adjust the side straps should the need arise. “These have the neck for a female.” Outside, two armed guards

Vanishing workforce
weighs on growth
Washington Post, by Jim Tankersley    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:28:59 PM     Post Reply
Put out an all-points bulletin: Millions of Americans have gone missing from the workforce. Every month that those would-be workers are gone raises the odds that they might never come back, dimming the prospects for future economic growth. The vanishing trend is more than a decade old, but it accelerated during the Great Recession. Throughout 2012, economists held out hope that it had stopped. But then came Friday’s jobs report, and hopes were dashed. The Labor Department reported that the U.S. labor force — everyone who has a job or is looking for one — shrank

A Reporter Explains Why
Gun Coverage Is So Biased
Power Line, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 9:13:14 PM     Post Reply
Well, not intentionally. But Jim Ragsdale of the Minneapolis Star Tribune attended a conference in Chicago on covering gun issues, which he describes this way: “Covering Guns” brought reporters with front-line experience covering mass shootings in Tucson, Ariz.; Aurora, Colo.; Newtown, Conn., and Red Lake, Minn., to meet with gun experts and advocates and gun trainers. Sponsored by the Poynter journalism center and funded by the McCormick Foundation of Chicago, we gathered in a city that witnessed 506 homicides last year. The idea, I take it

Report: Carbon Emissions
in US Lowest Since 1994
PJ Media, by Rick Moran    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 9:03:02 PM     Post Reply
Carbon emissions in the US were at their lowest level in 2012 since 1994, according to figures released by the US Energy Information Administration. We did it without carbon trading scams, the EPA making carbon dioxide a poison, or obeying the dictates of the Kyoto climate Treaty. We did it partly because of decreased economic activity as a result of the Obama recovery-that-isn’t, but mostly because of good old fashioned market forces; competition between natural gas and coal: Energy-related carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in 2012 were the lowest in the United States since 1994



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



We are living in a dying country (Thread 2)
72 replie(s)
Rushlimbaugh.com, by Rush Limbaugh    Original Article
Posted By: LComStaff- 4/7/2013 6:49:54 AM     Post Reply
This is the second thread of an article posted yesterday which can be found here:http://lucianne.com/thread/?artnum=730032

´My bangs are getting
a little irritating´: Michelle
Obama admits she already regrets
her high-maintenance hairdo

65 replie(s)
Daily Mail (UK), by Margot Peppers    Original Article
Posted By: pineledger- 4/7/2013 7:43:42 AM     Post Reply
Michelle Obama has admitted that she is already tired of the bangs she first sported in January. The First Lady said in an interview with Entertainment Tonight: ´Bangs are a day-by-day proposition. They´re starting to grow out, get a little irritating.´ Still, she hasn´t let her hairdo woes get her down. ´It´s okay,´ she said after her initial complaint. ´We´ll be good.´ The first indication that her hairstyle was becoming a burden came about last weekend, when Malia, 14, was spotted adjusting her mother´s hair during the White House Easter Egg Roll.

McCain: ´I don´t understand´
GOP filibuster on guns

65 replie(s)
Politico, by Jennifer Epstein    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/7/2013 12:18:14 PM     Post Reply
Sen. John McCain says he doesn´t understand the threats from some of his Republican colleagues to filibuster a bill on background checks to buy guns. "I don´t understand it," the Arizona Republican said on Sunday of the threat coming from Sen. Rand Paul,Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen. Mike Lee and nine other Republicans. "The purpose of the United States Senate is to debate and to vote and to let the people know where we stand.” "What are we afraid of? ... If this issue is as important as we all think it is, why not take ... it up and debate?"

Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney
General´ Comment Was a Gaffe

62 replie(s)
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM     Post Reply
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that

Christians, here´s why we´re
losing our religion

47 replie(s)
Fox News, by Craig Groeschel    Original Article
Posted By: STLstudent- 4/7/2013 5:13:55 PM     Post Reply
Recent research indicates that the number of people who do not consider themselves a part of an organized religion is steadily on the rise. Interestingly enough, though the number of those religiously unaffiliated is increasing, there is little to no trend in the number of those who express atheist or agnostic beliefs. People aren’t saying they don’t believe in God. They’re saying they don’t believe in religion. They are not rejecting Christ. They are rejecting the church. This begs the question, “Why are we losing our religion?”

Broadcasters worry
about ´Zero TV´ homes

46 replie(s)
Associated Press, by Ryan Nakashima    Original Article
Posted By: Ribicon- 4/7/2013 2:43:40 PM     Post Reply
Los Angeles — Some people have had it with TV. They´ve had enough of the 100-plus channel universe. They don´t like timing their lives around network show schedules. They´re tired of $100-plus monthly bills. A growing number of them have stopped paying for cable and satellite TV service, and don´t even use an antenna to get free signals over the air. (Snip) Last month, the Nielsen Co. started labeling people in this group "Zero TV" households, because they fall outside the traditional definition of a TV home. There are 5 million of these residences in the U.S., up from

Mother Of Slain Benghazi
Officer To Sean Hannity:
‘They Want Me To Shut Up’

44 replie(s)
Mediaite, by A.J. Delgado    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:00:16 AM     Post Reply
On Friday, Sean Hannity brought Pat Smith, mother of the late Sean Smith, on his radio program. The 34-year-old information management officer was one of four Americans murdered in the Benghazi embassy attack on September 11, 2012. In the chilling interview, a distraught Ms. Smith, in tears, pleaded for answers and spoke of the efforts to silence her. Ms. Smith first relayed how her son, prior to the attack, requested additional security in advance and warned the State Department: He did tell them, ahead of time, he typed it into his little typewriter over there,

Vanishing workforce
weighs on growth

42 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Jim Tankersley    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:28:59 PM     Post Reply
Put out an all-points bulletin: Millions of Americans have gone missing from the workforce. Every month that those would-be workers are gone raises the odds that they might never come back, dimming the prospects for future economic growth. The vanishing trend is more than a decade old, but it accelerated during the Great Recession. Throughout 2012, economists held out hope that it had stopped. But then came Friday’s jobs report, and hopes were dashed. The Labor Department reported that the U.S. labor force — everyone who has a job or is looking for one — shrank

Hillary Clinton Would Not
´Clear the Field´ for 2016

41 replie(s)
New Republic, by Tod Lindberg    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/6/2013 5:22:36 AM     Post Reply
No one is more preoccupied these days with Hillary Clinton´s 2016 plans than the Beltway political class—not even the former presidential candidate herself. To hear some tell it, her decision will be dispositive for all other Democrats thinking of entering the race. And pundits and reporters aren´t the only ones positing the "The Hillary Factor": No less than the House Democratic whip, Steny Hoyer, told BuzzFeed, “I don´t know that anybody would run against Hillary…. If she runs, she clears the field.” It´s an understandable conclusion, given Clinton´s stature in the Democratic Party and her 70 percent

Obama critic apologizes for
his ´poorly chosen words´
on gay marriage

41 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington DC], by Alexandra Jaffe    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/6/2013 12:18:19 PM     Post Reply
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson, considered by some to be a potential Republican contender for president, apologized to Johns Hopkins University for the "poorly chosen words" he used in expressing his opposition to gay marriage last month.“I am sorry for any embarrassment this has caused,” Carson said in the letter, reported in New York Magazine.(Snip) "Although I do believe marriage is between a man and a woman, there are much less offensive ways to make that point. I hope all will look at a lifetime of service over some poorly chosen words.” Carson will remain as commencement speaker at Johns Hopkins,

The Secrets of Princeton
40 replie(s)
New York Times, by Ross Douthat    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 8:08:09 AM     Post Reply
Susan Patton, the Princeton alumna who became famous for her letter urging Ivy League women to use their college years to find a mate, has been denounced as a traitor to feminism, to coeducation, to the university ideal. But really she’s something much more interesting: a traitor to her class. Her betrayal consists of being gauche enough to acknowledge publicly a truth that everyone who’s come up through Ivy League culture knows intuitively —

Beyonce, Jay-Z celebrate 5th
anniversary in Havana, Cuba

32 replie(s)
Los Angeles Times, by Nardine Saad    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 4/6/2013 8:20:04 AM     Post Reply
Beyonce and Jay-Z celebrated their fifth wedding anniversary in Cuba this week. The couple, who married on April 4, 2008, took in the sights of Old Havana, visited a school, dined on a rooftop terrace and strolled the fan-filled streets in their island best.(snip).The power couple declined to answer journalists´ questions about their visit to the island nation, but some outlets are reporting that the moguls are there as tourists, though that would be illegal because of the half-century embargo the U.S. has on the Communist country. However, the Miami Herald said Washington has issued special licenses for


Post Reply   Close thread 709365





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS