A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC


   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


The Obama-Crowley Set-Up
National Review Online, by John Yoo

Original Article

Posted By:Dreadnought, 10/18/2012 7:03:46 PM

Most observers seem to agree that the Barack Obama–Mitt Romney–Candy Crowley debate over whether the attack on our Benghazi consulate resulted from terrorism was the low point for the Republican candidate. While Romney turned out to be right on the substance, he was clearly flustered by Crowley’s intervention in Obama’s favor on the question of the president had called the attack an act of terror the day after. An old-time political hand in D.C., whom I know and who has advised and worked on many campaigns, is utterly convinced that the exchange was a setup

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: BaseballFan, 10/18/2012 7:09:34 PM     (No. 8943933)

FTA: Romney, of course, should go into the next debate assuming that the moderator, as a member of the working media, will have a conscious or unconscious bias against him and will shade things in favor of the incumbent.

Bob Schieffer, biased?!? No way!

/s off/

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: hammondb3, 10/18/2012 7:16:11 PM     (No. 8943941)

Honestly, the way I see it, I thought the gist of this article would be that it was a setup by the ROMNEY campaign for the next debate.

Romney now has the President on record, taking yet another untenable position into the last debate that will FEATURE this topic. The setup is there for Romney to deliver a knockout blow to Obama. Obama has now told the world that he KNEW it was a terrorist attack within 24 hours of the event. Now, that just begs the question as to why the sudden wholesale move to a story that involved a guy with a camcorder and a YouTube account.

If Romney plays this right (and he will, trust me), then Obama has a lot of explaining to do and frankly, there is no answer other than he decided to mount a campaign of disinformation to deflect blame away from his administration. Obama is hung out to dry on this and Obama/Crowley have played an unwitting role in a gambit that will have proven fatal to his campaign.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: JAN, 10/18/2012 7:20:39 PM     (No. 8943950)

Since the crow had the question in advance she had her answer ready too.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: pgvoisin, 10/18/2012 7:21:39 PM     (No. 8943951)

Setup?

You mean setback!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: john56, 10/18/2012 7:32:30 PM     (No. 8943973)

Why the Fat Lady was allowed to have anything other than DEBATE related material (ground rules, script -- which by the way appears on a telepromter in the screen in front of her -- for opening remarks, etc., a timer -- also in view of candidates --, or the questions of the audience) should never have been allowed.

But the Fat Lady was telegraphing for at least a week that she intended to disregard the agreed-upon rules of the debate. Of course, Obama agreed to change the rules in the middle of the game, so Romney was forced to acquiese to the Fat Lady's whims.

Fat Lady should have been thanked for her prior willingness to moderate and another RAT infested media whore should have been selected for the job once she determined she could not do the job as required.











  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Haskell, 10/18/2012 7:40:25 PM     (No. 8943989)

Interesting that she had THAT particular transcript at hand.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: lylacat, 10/18/2012 7:45:19 PM     (No. 8944002)

Candy Crowley is dumber than a door, wrong on the facts, and she is bigger than the average cow.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: grampus, 10/18/2012 7:48:41 PM     (No. 8944008)

I called it a "cooperative setup" on a thread here yesterday....based on the same evidence: Obama immediately called to Fudge Crowley, "Get the Transcript!"

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: rolanddd, 10/18/2012 7:50:57 PM     (No. 8944010)

BO totally knew there was a transcript.

I was screaming at the TV.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: veritasmatters, 10/18/2012 8:02:41 PM     (No. 8944028)

Curiously, Candy Crowley is on RECORD, two weeks ago during Sunday program, asking someone at the WH why it took so long to clarify "terrorist" activity responsible NOT uTube ditty. Odd that this is not being used in Mr. Yoo's article and many others. Obviously, since she pointed this out then, she was covering for zero at the debate. Just saying...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: bighambone, 10/18/2012 8:38:10 PM     (No. 8944094)

No matter what happened, Obama and crew have been deceptive with the American people since the 9/11/12 Banghazi terrorist attack about what actually occurred. Being a smart ass in the last debate about that by parsing the words he uttered on 9/12/12 is not going to save him and his administration. Most likely he will not figure that out until the votes are counted on election day.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: janylou, 10/18/2012 8:38:21 PM     (No. 8944096)

At Debates.org, in the lower left (isn't that a coincidence) corner, there is a link to send a message. I suggest that everyone does to voice their displeasure at this shameless biased display because clearly there was coordination between Crowley and Obama.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: FormerDem, 10/18/2012 8:47:28 PM     (No. 8944114)

Yes, I thought it was a setup too. She went straight to shuffling some papers and had the answer in front of her. Yeah right.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: Safari Man, 10/18/2012 9:41:07 PM     (No. 8944205)

The article doesn't mention Crowley held up some sheet of paper as she defended Obama. Its still unclear to me if that was the transcript, but it sure appeared to be. In any case, from Romney's perspective, it would have looked like she was reading directly from the transcript, which further put Romney at a disadvantage.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: NorthernDog, 10/18/2012 9:46:57 PM     (No. 8944217)

Their little trick isn't going to same him. But maybe she'll get a place of honor in his museum, which he can start working on 01/20/2013.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: lostinmassachusetts, 10/18/2012 10:06:02 PM     (No. 8944266)

To me, the proof that this was a setup was Obama's saying "Proceed Governor" with a wise-guy grin when Romney started to bring up the issue. You could tell he had some trick up his sleeve, and sure enough, that was the queue for Crowley to dig out the transcript to discredit what Romney was about to say. Too bad Romney didn't have time to ask why, if the President believed it was an "act of terror," he and his lackeys spent the next 14 days trying to deny it. My hope is that this issue won't day, but will come back to bite the administration in the days ahead.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: lostinmassachusetts, 10/18/2012 10:07:27 PM     (No. 8944272)

"day" should be "die"

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: ocjim, 10/18/2012 10:30:30 PM     (No. 8944309)

Arrogant Obama played his hand one debate too early. He needed to have Schieffer have the transcripts at the ready, and make his bold assertion (lie) in the third debate. Now he's tipped his hand, allowed Romney a few days to regain his balance on the issue, develop an ironclad Benghazi offense and prosecute it next Monday night. Typical Obama... He thinks tactically, not strategically. In his arrogance, he fights battles cleverly, runs victory laps and then loses the war.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: woodsman, 10/18/2012 10:56:58 PM     (No. 8944387)

More interesting that Barry knew she had it #6

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 20 - Posted by: hammondb3, 10/18/2012 11:36:41 PM     (No. 8944470)

17,

I took Obama's "Proceed, Governor" in a completely different manner. Romney was personally confronting him at the time and my initial sense was that Obama just wanted Romney to move on and not put him on the spot. It was a very interesting exchange to be sure.

And, now with Obama's insistence upon having known it was a terrorist attack within 24 hours of the event (as he SHOULD have known, frankly) that opens up a world of hurt on the obfuscation that ensued for the next 14 days from multiple persons under Obama's direct control.

Again, if Romney plays this right (and I have every reason to believe that he will) then Obama is in yet another indefensible position.

For the chess players out there, Romney has a knight fork on O's King & Queen. And you can stick that fork in Obama when it is over for he will be done.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: dolphin, 10/19/2012 7:46:08 AM     (No. 8945002)

We knew this would happen. We knew it had happened before. We know it will happen again and again and again.

I believe we may have the definition of insanity here. Any ideas on what to do about it? Anybody?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 22 - Posted by: Mazeman, 10/19/2012 7:46:22 AM     (No. 8945003)

Obama knew the name of the qustioner (Kerry) before being told. He quietly says "Hi Kerry" before the name was announced.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: guybee, 10/19/2012 7:54:25 AM     (No. 8945018)

Watch the debate at the 1 hour and 06 minute mark. When Obama looks for Kerry Ladka in the audience BEFORE he reveals himself?

Didn't Crowley say she had the questions formulated the AM before - on Monday. How did Ladka and his brain trust come up with this question afterwards?

Notice Obama says Hi Kerry before he finds him and then corrects himself and starts looking around for him - realizing he was showing he knew too much.

Proceed Governor was Obama telling Romney he was about to step in it.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 24 - Posted by: uno, 10/19/2012 8:02:41 AM     (No. 8945034)

#24 - That's how it impressed me. "Proceed Governor" you're going in the right direction, you're about to step in it, go ahead and make my night.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 25 - Posted by: sagman, 10/19/2012 8:25:30 AM     (No. 8945083)

Dream On

WOLF BLITZER: Candy did what she was told: set Romney up or she’d become a stringer in Nairobi.
SCOTT PELLEY: I’m getting ticked. Carney just gave me a list of election night analysts acceptable to the White House.
BOB SCHIEFFER: On Monday, I’m supposed to ask Romney if he has any concerns about a Mormon in the Oval Office who is subject to his church’s elders. There’s also a court order restraining me from coming within 500 feet of Obama with a question which might appear harmless but could be used to bludgeon him.
BRIAN WILLIAMS: Remember when it was collaborative?
DIANE SAWYER: Yeah. Wasn’t so long ago they rolled over in the morning and kissed us and said they still respected us.
BLITZER: I’m tired of sucking up to these people.
JIM LEHRER: Look, we’re all progressives, but it’s way past time we put journalistic integrity before bootlicking.
SAWYER: Agreed. Let’s get our reputations back by reporting the news instead of spinning it.
BLITZER: I’m in. People, we have been flaming hypocrites for a long time. Time to make amends.
WILLIAMS: Join hands. Let’s remember what Benjamin Franklin wrote in 1776: ''We must, indeed, all hang together, or most assuredly we shall all hang separately.''

[Williams’ cell rings]

Hello. What? Damn! [hangs up] Word's already out we're turning. Starting tonight, NBC Nightly News is on a five minute tape delay.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 26 - Posted by: gwmcclintok, 10/19/2012 8:26:02 AM     (No. 8945085)

Jack Cashill has a similar article as well at American Thinker. The fact is the MSM in person of Crow-ley told a lie to defend Obama. That is the 'tipping point' from yesterday. The press has been telling lies to help Obama and his so called presidency. They are liars assisting a liar in chief. And she knew she was lying to defend Obama. It was arranged for sure. This is also why the MSM has become an enemy to our country and our freedoms.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 27 - Posted by: Pepper Tree, 10/19/2012 8:28:54 AM     (No. 8945092)

"Proceed, Governor" was Barry misreading his cards and thinking he was holding a straight flush.

He and everyone else knew the topic of the film lie would come up, and that he and Crowley had a routine worked out when it did.

When he arrogantly said, "proceed Governor", it was also his childish impatience tipping off the whole world that a trap of collusion had been set.

What must have gone through Crowley's mind when dumbell Barry exposed her as well as himself. So much for the myth of Barry's cool and intellect.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 28 - Posted by: mabelkitty, 10/19/2012 8:38:14 AM     (No. 8945115)

The sad part of all this is that she has been shuttled to the sidelines of media like so many women because we get older, puffier, and no longer 'relevant to men', if you will.

Rather than come on as an equal and make a name for herself as a feminist icon by holding them both to the fire, she ingratiated herself to men in such a way as to prop him up and diminish her stature.

She squandered a great opportunity.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 29 - Posted by: Standlow, 10/19/2012 8:44:27 AM     (No. 8945138)

How could Obama and Crowley think that we would be so credulous as to believe this obviously pre-planned exchange? When did Crowley abandon her previous statements of delay in calling it terror? This is grade school level chicanery.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 30 - Posted by: Adam, 10/19/2012 8:47:32 AM     (No. 8945149)

Having worked for a major media company for almost decades, I tend to chalk up such things to garden variety bias and not conspiracy. But, this really smells like a set up. The coincidences are just too fantastic.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 31 - Posted by: twinkles, 10/19/2012 8:56:11 AM     (No. 8945166)

We sit and watch and have apoplexy. Enough is enough. The biased moderators are an insult to this nation and all it was built on. Carrying their agenda into the arena is the height of unfairness. Why have the Republicans tolerated this horse plop all these years?

I suggest that the debate format be changed. There should be TWO moderators; one chosen from each side.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 32 - Posted by: Jebediah, 10/19/2012 8:57:29 AM     (No. 8945171)

Hate to say it, but this is what I thought right off the bat. Obama's confident "get the transcript"( twice) and Crowley just happening to HAVE the transcript is just too pat......I think the author lets her off the hook way too easily. She is a long term political newsperson, not some kid just off the boat, so she must have sensed her prepping, and at least tacitly agreed------and there is still the fact that she HAD the transcript at the ready. She is a huge embarrassment, but CNN is even more so for being so proud of her, constant interruptions during ROMNEY's key points non withstanding.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 33 - Posted by: fed-up, 10/19/2012 8:58:26 AM     (No. 8945174)

Romney will have the facts on his side on Monday. My only hope is that he never turns to ask obama a question.. that only gives the one a chance to respond and lie. Just keep driving home the simple facts, and question rhetorically.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 34 - Posted by: Holeymoses, 10/19/2012 9:03:47 AM     (No. 8945185)

Obama was saved by the bell, that's all. He's got bad stuff coming his way Monday night and I m sure the TV will be wall to wall Benghazi this weekend. Watch poll numbers go lower.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 35 - Posted by: LZK, 10/19/2012 9:27:18 AM     (No. 8945252)

When WE are the guys who play "by the rules set up" -- WE are shocked to see such a obvious beach of ethics....

Well -- why should WE be shocked? WE should always expect dirty tricks. It's obama -- for goodness sakes....

The liar/in/chief plays dirty and mean like the streets in Chicago.....

LZK

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 36 - Posted by: Maybeth, 10/19/2012 9:34:27 AM     (No. 8945280)

More interesing is the fact that Obama was well aware that Crowley had the transcript on hand .... as he breathlessly awaited the moment when he his debating partner, Candy, could spring a surprise against Mitt.

Ooops.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 37 - Posted by: Salt5792, 10/19/2012 9:40:47 AM     (No. 8945299)

One point in Crowley's favor--Scheiffer is worse.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 38 - Posted by: Grambo, 10/19/2012 9:42:34 AM     (No. 8945302)

The WH/CNN team made the mistake of thinking that the sort of chicanery that they get away with on their Honey Boo Boo audience doesn’t fly in the debate forum. Honey Boo Boo’s don’t watch debates – serious people do, and they don’t fall for cheap tricks. Once again, the exploding cigar singes Obama’s eyebrows.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 39 - Posted by: starbaby, 10/19/2012 9:52:01 AM     (No. 8945330)

#11, I saved the debate transcript and plan to go through and count. The most obvious to me was when Romney was talking about Fast & Furious. OBAMA: Candy? And lo and behold Candy interrupted Romney & cut him off.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 40 - Posted by: Eheu Fugaces, 10/19/2012 10:13:33 AM     (No. 8945405)

At this point, there is little question that there was collusion. The only questions remaining pertain to the extent, the depth, and the breadth of the collusion. The results have been plain for all to see, but as SOP for this administration, there is obfuscation up front, and frantic cleanup in the backgruund.

P.S. Good job, #26. Once again you nailed it.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 41 - Posted by: greggojo, 10/19/2012 10:22:45 AM     (No. 8945422)

Obama is a snake. So are all of the self-appointed elitist liberals who control 90% of the American media. I am so sick of these "socialism for thee, not for me" multimillionaires (Chris Matthews comes right to mind), beyond their hypocrisy, they have made a catastrophic mess of our country.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 42 - Posted by: Arby, 10/19/2012 10:37:46 AM     (No. 8945447)

You never expect to be lied to, in a flagrant way, in public. It's startling and decentering. In this case, however, it represents serious grist for the foreign policy debate. This one is going to be biting Fauxbama's skinny butt, big time.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 43 - Posted by: peterfleming, 10/19/2012 10:42:19 AM     (No. 8945463)

The so called "main stream press" IS
THE ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE. The Cow Crowley proved her socialist O slanting shamelessly.
The really weak TV link is that FoxTVNews, for all the good they do, will not slam their fellow union newscasters along with their enemy politicians. On FoxTVNews, and most of unionized talk radio, Diane Sawyer and the entire Old Media crew get a virtual pass. The TV Mafia Media is the Protection Racket for all of the Beltway greed and crimes. The New Breitbartian Media attack must be versus ALL crooked politicians, bureaucrats, the Fed, etc, along with the commies in the traitorous old media.
If the Diane Sawyers were honest to their audience, we would not be in the severe mess
we find ourselves. The Benghazi Lie is the most recent and frightening issue to throw at all the Diane Sawyers. This is as obvious
a dishonest, blatant cover up as any reasonable person will ever need to see the work of TV network traitors to the truth.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 44 - Posted by: bobdog, 10/19/2012 10:59:55 AM     (No. 8945513)

If you liked Candy Crowley last week, you're gonna absolutely love Bob Schieffer next week.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 45 - Posted by: RancherJack, 10/19/2012 11:13:14 AM     (No. 8945536)

Once is happenstance
Twice coincidence
Three times is enemy action


We're way past three times

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 46 - Posted by: Cadillaqjaq, 10/19/2012 11:16:37 AM     (No. 8945546)

In reading the many good comments on the subject today, I've seen several that presume Governor Romney will try to make his point again about what President Obama knew and when he knew it, i.e., ''...if Romney plays this right, and I have every reason to believe that he will...''

Certainly he has the ammunition to create what many of us see as a huge problem for President Obama and his White House cabal: please explain why for weeks they chose to blame a distasteful video as the cause of the Benghazi Conulate attack if the President, in fact, did initially label it a terror attack as he and CNN's Candy Crowely claimed.

Will Governor Romney take the opportunity? Or instead pressure the President on his total lack of leadership in the Iranian nuclear issue?

I guess we will know soon enough; Monday is a few days away.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 47 - Posted by: mrduc, 10/19/2012 11:20:24 AM     (No. 8945557)

The reason urkel kept looking down during the first debate was that a staff member had planted an iPad in his podium earlier to coach him and feed info. Long after the first debate was over and the stage cleared, cameras caught the same staffer retrieving the device. At the second debate, Candy was invited to the WH before hand and coached what to do when (not if) urkel got in trouble. Hence, the 'Candy...' prompts from Urkel and then she jumped right in and cut of Romney. An orchestrated ballet. These are wicked, evil people.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 48 - Posted by: LINGILLEN, 10/19/2012 11:23:22 AM     (No. 8945566)

#6 & # 20

More interesting, still, is that Obama's answer to the Town Hall question was irrelevant, which means that the supposed transcript to support it was also irrelevant. (Town Hall participant, Kerry Ladka, asked 'who denied the embassy's request for aid on 9/11/12, and why').

How did Crowley know Obama was going to give an irrelevant answer?

It was reported here earlier in the week that Crowley had visited the White House the Sunday before the debate. It's almost as if they agreed that if the subject of Benghazi came up, this would be their answer, 'and stick with it.'

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 49 - Posted by: DelandMarco, 10/19/2012 11:26:24 AM     (No. 8945574)

Why not refuse to participate unless there is one liberal and one conservative moderator or better yet, no moderator at all.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 50 - Posted by: Cadillaqjaq, 10/19/2012 11:29:44 AM     (No. 8945582)



If Frank J. Fahrenkopf, Jr. hasn't been contacted and a demand made to clean up the so-called ''debates'' and eliminate the current two-on-one venue before Monday, he should be... someone of us here must know how to find him. It's way past time IMO!

jaq~



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 51 - Posted by: seminolesecure, 10/19/2012 11:37:00 AM     (No. 8945604)

Leave us not forget that when Candy "got the transcript" as directed, a certain First Lady in the audience broke rules and of course decorum and started the forbidden clapping. The kerry stuff is intriguing! He sure loves the limelight and in subsequent interviews he does not seem the least bit undecided to me. A koolaid drinker fer sure.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 52 - Posted by: NoodlesNoodlemann, 10/19/2012 12:25:56 PM     (No. 8945741)

Romney will be ready to knock it out of the park at the final debate. No reason to go for the knockout in the 2nd debate. Save it for the final. I think Romney will be prepared and they are keeping Obama off balance. He could have creamed him this week, but why give him time to recover? Do it in the final debate. Romney is no dope.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 53 - Posted by: DSchneider, 10/19/2012 12:36:03 PM     (No. 8945771)

I don't think Obama actually said during the debate that he called Benghazi an act of terror. He had Crowley do that for him. All he asked was that Romney proceed. Then he asked Crowley to look at the transcript (how did he know she had it in front of her?). When she said that he'd called it terror, he DID NOT agree with her. He just asked for her to repeat it more loudly.

Crowley did the dirty work for Obama, who could then say "I never said that" in subsequent debates and interviews.

Get the picture?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 54 - Posted by: stealthy, 10/19/2012 12:49:57 PM     (No. 8945796)

It's a safe bet that shieferbrains will try to help Oboy.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 55 - Posted by: mickturn, 10/19/2012 1:04:15 PM     (No. 8945824)

You know the witch was in Obie's back pocket, why else would they be comparing notes on the Rose Garden Speech?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 56 - Posted by: uno, 10/19/2012 1:28:12 PM     (No. 8945915)

Next week's burning question for inquiring minds is:
Will Bob "The Knob" Schieffer claim ignorance of Benghazi because he was on vacation that week???

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 57 - Posted by: walcb, 10/19/2012 1:32:26 PM     (No. 8945930)

At some time Crowley has to be questioned about how she happened to have the transcript and how she didn't have to open the transcript to state that Obama did use the word terror. Surely this will happen??

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 58 - Posted by: larryp, 10/19/2012 2:14:57 PM     (No. 8946069)

Look at the exchange between Crowley et al with the MUTE off.You can see her scripted
motions, to wit: move hands here,stand up, move hands/arms there--totally scripted appearing.Like a magician distracts from what is said by arm/hand movements.
In '08 Obama gave Obama and Hillary the finger by rubbing his cheek with his middle finger-Hillary in the primary and M'cain during the debates. The audience laughed both times.The finger was the side away from the moderator but the audience of morons caught it.
This time, Crowley was invited to the WH acc to reports on Sunday. That was when the
rehearsal took place. She even has WH docs!
Besides Meatloaf couldn't appear as moderator so she was the stand-in.Heh heh!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 59 - Posted by: wlit22z, 10/19/2012 2:20:36 PM     (No. 8946081)

Crowley was a very poor choice as moderator. Sort of like going to the bottom of the barrel because others didn't want to have anything to do with it. It was a foregone conclusion that Crowley would be a helpmate to the Mulatto Kid, after all she's a lib on a lib network. What more do you have to know?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 60 - Posted by: slowslider, 10/19/2012 3:41:52 PM     (No. 8946267)

Assume the moderator and LSM are biased?!?!?! WTH? BL, if Mitt didn't know before he started the campaign he shouldn't even be in the ring.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 61 - Posted by: Quiet Observer, 10/19/2012 4:01:47 PM     (No. 8946311)

A few days ago Breitbart.com reported (link below) on how Candy Crowley had stepped into the exact same trap when interviewing David Axelrod on her “State of the Union” Show on 9/30. Following that interview, either Crowley pulled the transcript of Obama’s 9/12 rose garden speech or received a copy of it from someone on the Obama team (with a note to bring it with her to the debate?).

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2012/10/16/Flashback-Crowley-To-Axelrod-Obama-Never-Said-Benghazi-Attack-Was-Act-Of-Terror-On-Day-After

I am not trying to defend her actions - she could have said that although Obama used the phrase “acts of terror” in the 9/12 speech in which he also discussed the Benghazi attack, he made no effort to connect the two – but, by interrupting Romney and “settling the issue” of whether Obama said “act(s) of terror” during the 9/12 speech, she may have inadvertently saved Romney from jumping into the trap with both feet.

As it turned out, by drawing so much attention to that speech, the full transcript has come out - allowing anyone with an open mind to realize that Obama was lying. Nowhere in that speech did he identify the Benghazi attack as an act of terror.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 62 - Posted by: snowcloud, 10/19/2012 4:02:48 PM     (No. 8946313)

That transcript comment by BO showed very clearly that there was collusion.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 63 - Posted by: bifgroovey, 10/19/2012 4:05:02 PM     (No. 8946317)

In the next debate, Romney should just ask Bob to grab the transcript of something and watch what happens.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 64 - Posted by: ocjim, 10/19/2012 4:51:18 PM     (No. 8946432)

My understanding is that Crowley was at the WH last Sunday before the debate. Looks to me like someone told her then or otherwise told her that Obama naturally expected some attacks from Romney on Benghazi and Obama told her to have several transcripts available. I don't think it was conspiratorial, just some coordination that sure should have been made more public and that the Romney campaign should have been informed of the transcripts being present during the debate. Maybe she did inform the Romney campaign. In any case, during the debate it ran letter perfect for Obama and he could even ask Crowley to go to the transcript, and even ask her to repeat it. Gotcha!
Or not quite so quick, Mr. Smarty Pants Liar... One problem, he was obviously misrepresenting the transcript contents and got caught and he now after the debate, looks desperate and dishonest for all to see.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 65 - Posted by: Me?Opinionated?Nah!, 10/19/2012 6:14:15 PM     (No. 8946631)

What a great concept for a debate! The moderator in cahoots with the incumbent candidate! The aspiring candidate totally out of the loop! It’s an ideal time-saver. No meanspirited bickering and arguing to gum up the works. That’s how things get done The Chicago Way. Just ask Al Capone, whydon’tcha!



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 66 - Posted by: Bla Bla, 10/19/2012 6:27:00 PM     (No. 8946648)

If it was a set-up, the set-up BLEW-up in their faces! It has caused all eyes & ears to turn to the Benghazi incident in a way they never wanted. They stupidly thought that it would settle their hot potato once & for all, & everyone would move on. But, instead, it opened a Pandora's box they can't shut.

Now even the talk shows & alphabet news networks are having to cover this story. Talk about an exploding cigar! They have built their own gallows. Thank you God, for allowing them to hang themselves with their own cheating bias!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 67 - Posted by: pouncer, 10/19/2012 7:07:34 PM     (No. 8946717)

Wow. Obama looked RIGHT AT and nodded his head at Kerry Latka and said hello Mr. Kerry to him and then caught himself and pretended to look all around the room and then PRETENDED to not remember his name. Check out the 1.07.17 mark.

BUSTED !!!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 68 - Posted by: Charactercounts, 10/19/2012 9:31:51 PM     (No. 8946897)

The whole exchange was a set-up. Its obvious. Look at Obama's demeanor, his "Proceed, Governor" remark, then his telling Candy to say it louder. All very rehearsed.

He might think that this sort of hairsplitting settles things, but it doesn't. The people watching saw it for what it was. Playing lawlerly games with the use of the word terrorism looks exactly like what it is, and people don't have patience for that kind of stuff.

As #70 said, Obama may have thought that would settle the matter. Instead, everyone is paying more attention to the whole Benghazi incident, along with knowing that he and Crowley colluded.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 69 - Posted by: LINGILLEN, 10/19/2012 9:45:31 PM     (No. 8946926)

#61 - CNN said of their overwhelmingly positive comments on Crowley's performance, the question most raised was about the transcript. I posted it here twice. They said she had it with her because she had selected the questions herself, and needed transcripts to refresh her memory and to refer to, if needed, during the Town Hall debate. But why did both of them refer to that particular transcript, which had nothing to do with the question of why were the ambassador's requests for aid denied?

#68 - Crowley and Obama should no way have met and discussed the questions to be discussed, since Crowley chose the questions, herself. Did Obama help her select the ones that worked to his advantage? Any discussion between the two of them would be an extreme case of 'conflict of interest' and is probably against the rules of the Town Hall-style debate. However, Crowley changed the rules to suit herself. Now we know why.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 70 - Posted by: radrelic, 10/19/2012 10:32:53 PM     (No. 8947000)

Candy Cowlike met obama at the White House or at least was at the White House withing the week prior to the debate. She was subject overplaying her probably-longed-for time in the political arena spotlight--A career or portfolio booster.

I think she at least told him she would have the transcripts and info for the questions and I wouldn't put it past her to have given him the questions.

Inserting herself into the debate was a gift to all of us who hate the media bias as a threat to democracy. Who knows, if it continues we might have a socialist in th eWhite House who gives a cabinet position to an avowed Communist and is so sure of media cover that doesn't even hesitate on many unprecedented actions or inactions. s/

That Romney recovered the double shock blow o and C landed is the good part. He will be able to handle Putin and China and Iran, IMO. And will have a think tank to help him and I bet he puts aside old animosities to do so. An extraordinary man, and Veep and recovery in sight. God willing.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 707572




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"



The five extra words that can
fix the Second Amendment
Washington Post, by John Paul Stevens    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/11/2014 10:35:30 PM     Post Reply
Following the massacre of grammar-school children in Newtown, Conn., in December 2012, high-powered weapons have been used to kill innocent victims in more senseless public incidents. Those killings, however, are only a fragment of the total harm caused by the misuse of firearms. Each year, more than 30,000 people die in the United States in firearm-related incidents. Many of those deaths involve handguns. The adoption of rules that will lessen the number of those incidents should be a matter of primary concern to both federal and state legislators. Legislatures are in a far better position than judges to assess the

U.S. blocks Iran’s pick as envoy to
U.N., setting up new confrontation
Washington Post, by Anne Gearan    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/11/2014 10:32:08 PM     Post Reply
The Obama administration said Friday that it would block Iran’s nominee as ambassador to the United Nations from entering the United States, setting up a new confrontation with Tehran just as relations with the Islamic republic appeared to be improving. The decision to bar entry to the diplomat, who was allegedly involved in the 1979 seizure of the U.S. Embassy in Tehran, followed intense political pressure on the administration from Republicans and Democrats on Capitol Hill. But it also marked a rare instance in which Washington has effectively vetoed another country’s preferred choice as envoy to the United Nations. Iran

Distressed homeowners seeking
mortgage relief could get
stuck with a big tax bill
Washington Post, by Dina ElBoghdady    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/11/2014 10:28:52 PM     Post Reply
Struggling homeowners across the country could face significant new tax bills if they receive mortgage relief from their banks, a prospect that threatens to slow the housing recovery and put further strain on distressed borrowers. The collapse of the housing market and plunging home prices left millions of people stuck owing more on their mortgages than their homes were worth. Some have worked with their banks to reduce the loan amount to avoid foreclosure or enable a sale. In 2007, Congress adopted a law that spared those homeowners from being taxed on the amount of the loan that was forgiven. But

11 Sebelius Supporters with
Egg on Their Faces Today
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Ben Shapiro    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/11/2014 8:43:12 PM     Post Reply
On Thursday, Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius resigned her position. The New York Times reported the resignation as a punishment for failure: Officials said Ms. Sebelius, 65, made the decision to resign and was not forced out. But the frustration at the White House over her performance had become increasingly clear, as administration aides worried that the crippling problems at HealthCare.gov, the website set up to enroll Americans in insurance exchanges, would result in lasting damage to the president’s legacy. So Sebelius stuck around just long enough to reach the mythical 7 million enrollment number

Contempt and the IRS
National Review Online, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/11/2014 7:37:05 AM     Post Reply
The House Oversight Committee has voted to hold former IRS subpotentate Lois Lerner in contempt of Congress, while the House Ways and Means Committee has referred her case to the Justice Department for criminal prosecution. The facts in the case suggest very strongly that Ms. Lerner has earned the contempt of the American people as well as criminal prosecution to the full extent of the law. The question of whether Justice will do justice now rests with the Obama administration, in service to which Ms. Lerner organized and oversaw the repression of nonprofit activists under color of IRS authority. That

A Criminal Organization Masquerading
As… Oh, You Know the Rest
PJ Media, by Michael Walsh    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/10/2014 10:25:12 PM     Post Reply
Another day, another chronicle of Democratic Party malfeasance. Enjoy: In Congress, Rep. Darrell Issa of California has just leveled an explosive charge against his Democrat counterpart on the House Oversight and Government Reform committee — to wit, that the gentleman from Maryland colluded with the IRS to harass a conservative organization fighting for honest elections: Issa said records obtained last week from the IRS show communications from the office of ranking member Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., about True the Vote, a Texas-based, non-profit conservative group that aims to prevent voter fraud.The communications at one point involved Lois Lerner, the ex-IRS

Kathleen Sebelius resigning after
botched Obamacare rollout
Washington Times, by Tom Howell Jr. and Dave Boyer    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/10/2014 10:21:10 PM     Post Reply
With the rocky rollout of his health care law in a post-deadline lull, President Obama will move this week to shake up his health care team, accepting the resignation of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and tapping his budget director as a troubleshooting replacement, the White House confirmed Thursday. Mrs. Sebelius, a former Kansas governor who has served as HHS secretary for Mr. Obama’s entire tenure, was the president’s point person as his signature law stumbled out of the blocks in October. Despite calls for her to be fired, Mrs. Sebelius stayed on the job to oversee a

Social Security, Treasury
target taxpayers for their
parents’ decades-old debts
Washington Post, by Marc Fisher    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/10/2014 10:14:13 PM     Post Reply
A few weeks ago, with no notice, the U.S. government intercepted Mary Grice’s tax refunds from both the IRS and the state of Maryland. Grice had no idea that Uncle Sam had seized her money until some days later, when she got a letter saying that her refund had gone to satisfy an old debt to the government — a very old debt. When Grice was 4, back in 1960, her father died, leaving her mother with five children to raise. Until the kids turned 18, Sadie Grice got survivor benefits from Social Security to help feed and clothe them.

Thought police on patrol
Washington Post, by Charles Krauthammer    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/10/2014 10:10:00 PM     Post Reply
Two months ago, a petition bearing more than 110,000 signatures was delivered to The Post, demanding a ban on any article questioning global warming. The petition arrived the day before publication of my column, which consisted of precisely that heresy. The column ran as usual. But I was gratified by the show of intolerance because it perfectly illustrated my argument that the left is entering a new phase of ideological agitation — no longer trying to win the debate but stopping debate altogether, banishing from public discourse any and all opposition. The proper word for that attitude is totalitarian. It

A Divisive Attorney General
National Review Online, by Victor Davis Hanson    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/10/2014 9:52:38 PM     Post Reply
Attorney General Eric Holder must be suffering from a sort of amnesia. He is upset at supposed divisiveness and rudeness directed at him when testifying before Congress, and suggests not too subtly that he and President Obama have been accorded inordinately harsh treatment (fill in the blanks why). Aside from the fact that he seemed to have relished the combat with Representative Gohmert in quite unprofessional tones (“you don’t want to go there, buddy, alright?”/ “good luck with your asparagus”), he seems to forget what former attorney general Alberto Gonzales once endured both in the liberal media and before Democrats

The Shame of Brandeis
Commentary Magazine, by John Podhoretz    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/9/2014 8:32:37 PM     Post Reply
If you have not yet heard, Brandeis University has rescinded its offer of an honorary degree to Ayaan Hirsi Ali, the Somali-born activist whose work has focused on the barbaric misogyny rampant in Islamic societies like the one in which she was raised—and whose efforts to call attention to them as a legislator in the Netherlands led to a political crisis there and her eventual flight to the United States. Given that it only takes a Google search to find out everything one would need to know about her, including the controversial aspects of her views, it is disgustingly laughable

Demonizing SCOTUS:
The OCare Precedent
Commentary Magazine, by Seth Mandel    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/8/2014 9:12:38 PM     Post Reply
When Chief Justice John Roberts rewrote ObamaCare from the bench in order to save it, most of the ramifications were immediately apparent. But there was one aspect of the stunt that as a member of the Supreme Court Roberts should have been sensitive to: precedent. Having caved to a public intimidation campaign from the president and his congressional allies (as well as the media) Roberts signaled that the way to get a conservative justice to discard his better judgment and rule against constitutional law was to impugn the court’s reputation in the public square. Be mean to John Roberts and



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Bundy Ranch, the Federal Government,
and the Nevada Water Tipping Point

52 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Monica Morrill    Original Article
Posted By: mikkins2- 4/12/2014 7:29:42 AM     Post Reply
Many Americans have been watching with great consternation the ongoing struggle between the Federal Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the U.S. Marshals against Cliven Bundy and his family. There are no signs of either side relinquishing their position. Many onlookers have been informed that this dispute is over protecting the desert tortoise. But it is nothing of the sort. In fact, the reality of the dispute goes far underneath what is being talked about. The more appropriate source of the dispute is ground water as well as surface water -- this is a war over water. Cliven Bundy and his

Cowboys steal their cattle BACK
in tense showdown over Nevada´s last
rancher: Protesters break federal
blockade as militias threaten to
join fight and pregnant woman claims
she was assaulted by agents

50 replie(s)
Daily Mail (UK), by Dan Miller & Meghan Keneally    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/11/2014 10:29:52 AM     Post Reply
The son of the Nevada rancher locked in an increasingly tense land dispute with the federal government, says their cowboys managed to break a blockade and retrieve around 30 head of cattle. Federal agents swooped on Tuesday after Cliven Bundy, dubbed the last remaining rancher in southern Nevada, refused to remove his herd of 900 cows from land he claims has been in his family since 1870. The heavily-armed federal agents, equipped with eight helicopters and backed-up by snipers, surrounded the Bundy ranch after the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) attained a federal court order to confiscate the family´s herd. But

Hillary Clinton Cancels Appearance Where
Benghazi Victim´s Mom, Protestors Await

47 replie(s)
Cybercast News Service, by Barbara Boland    Original Article
Posted By: BaseballFan- 4/11/2014 10:02:18 AM     Post Reply
Hillary Clinton was the planned keynote speaker at the 17th Annual Western Healthcare Leadership Academy in San Diego on April 11 - but she´s cancelled her visit in the midst of planned protests from San Diego locals and military families. Protestors organized by "The Difference Matters" do not want the former U.S. Secretary of State to come because of Clinton´s role in the Benghazi scandal. "She is not welcome here in San Diego by so many of us. We don´t want her here," said Jan Iverson, a local mother and protestor. (Snip) Clinton´s office says she changed plans because of

The five extra words that can
fix the Second Amendment

44 replie(s)
Washington Post, by John Paul Stevens    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/11/2014 10:35:30 PM     Post Reply
Following the massacre of grammar-school children in Newtown, Conn., in December 2012, high-powered weapons have been used to kill innocent victims in more senseless public incidents. Those killings, however, are only a fragment of the total harm caused by the misuse of firearms. Each year, more than 30,000 people die in the United States in firearm-related incidents. Many of those deaths involve handguns. The adoption of rules that will lessen the number of those incidents should be a matter of primary concern to both federal and state legislators. Legislatures are in a far better position than judges to assess the

Barack Obama Saves Wife
Michelle From Wardrobe Malfunction,
Marilyn Monroe Moment: Picture

34 replie(s)
US Magazine, by Rachel McRady    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 4/10/2014 7:59:06 PM     Post Reply
Barack Obama got quite the handful on Thursday, April 10, but it was all for a good cause! As the President of the United States was boarding Air Force One with his wife Michelle Obama, a gust of wind blew up her skirt. Barack quickly stepped in and grabbed the First Lady´s billowing skirt to help her avoid a wardrobe malfunction and embarrassing Marilyn Monroe moment. Earlier in the week, another famous lady on the global stage suffered a similar snafu, but no one was around to help her -- not even her prince!

Sunk: Climate change threatens to
flood world´s largest Navy base
warns Gov. Terry McAuliffe

32 replie(s)
Washington Examiner, by Paul Bedard    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/11/2014 4:08:01 PM     Post Reply
Recently elected Democratic Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe is warning that global warming could raise sea levels high enough to flood the Hampton Roads region, home to the world´s largest naval base, without immediate and “smart decisions.” Addressing an environmental summit this week at the Virginia Military Institute in Lexington, Va., McAuliffe embraced climate change, blamed humans for causing it, and said action is needed now to protect Virginia´s coast from rising ocean levels that will result from global warming. “The first big decision of course is to accept that climate change is real,” he told the group. “I happen to believe in

President Obama stands by Rev. Al Sharpton
while accusing Republicans of trying
to restrict the right to vote

28 replie(s)
New York Daily News, by Celeste Katz & Annie Karni    Original Article
Posted By: Flyright- 4/12/2014 7:02:39 AM     Post Reply
President Obama stood Friday with the Rev. Al Sharpton and accused Republicans of trying to keep millions of Americans from voting, in a fiery speech days after new revelations about Sharpton’s past as an FBI informant. “The right to vote is threatened today in a way that it has not been since the Voting Rights Act became law nearly five decades ago,” Obama told the annual convention of Sharpton’s National Action Network in Manhattan. Obama’s appearance represented a presidential seal of approval of Sharpton’s role as a civil rights activist, amid the new revelations about how Sharpton used a wire to record

The IRS Scandal Comes Into Focus
27 replie(s)
Wall Street Journal, by Kimberley A. Strassel    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/11/2014 6:33:53 AM     Post Reply
Nearly a year into the IRS scandal, we still don´t know exactly what happened—though we are finally getting an inkling. That´s thanks to the letter House Ways and Means Chairman Dave Camp sent this week to the Justice Department recommending a criminal probe of Lois Lerner. The average citizen might be dizzied by the torrent of confusing terms—BOLO lists, Tigta, 501(c)(4)—and the array of accusations that have made up this IRS investigation. Mr. Camp´s letter takes a step back to remind us why this matters, even as it provides compelling new information that goes to motive and method—and clarifies some of

Global solar dominance in sight
as science trumps fossil fuels

26 replie(s)
Telegraph [UK], by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/10/2014 6:08:54 PM     Post Reply
Solar power has won the global argument. Photovoltaic energy is already so cheap that it competes with oil, diesel and liquefied natural gas in much of Asia without subsidies. Roughly 29pc of electricity capacity added in America last year came from solar, rising to 100pc even in Massachusetts and Vermont.[Snip] The technology is improving so fast--helped by the US military--that it has achieved a virtous circle. Michael Parker and Flora Chang, at Sanford Bernstein, say we entering a new order of "global energy deflation" that must ineluctably erode the viability of oil, gas and the fossil fuel nexus over time.

Jeb Bush defends ‘act of love’
26 replie(s)
Politico, by Maggie Haberman    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/11/2014 12:53:18 PM     Post Reply
STAMFORD, Conn. — Jeb Bush defended his controversial comments about immigration reform, insisting they were nothing new for him and urging “sensitivity to the immigrant experience.” At a Connecticut Republican party dinner Thursday night, the former Republican governor of Florida did not repeat his remarks from last weekend at his father’s presidential library, when he said that people who come to the United States illegally in search of a better life for their children “broke the law, but it’s not a felony. It’s an act of love.” This time the potential 2016 candidate put it differently. “To be young and

Pelosi: Immigration law
like internment of Japanese

24 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Neil Munro    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/10/2014 3:42:16 PM     Post Reply
The deportation of foreigners living illegally in the United States is similar to the forced internment of ethnic-Japanese Americans in World War II, according to Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi. “I’ll be very honest with you: Looking at the numbers at some point, in terms of how people are treated and deported and families separated and the rest, this has a scent of Japanese internment,” Pelosi told a Politico reporter. “It’s really a black mark,” said Pelosi. Roughly 110,000 ethnic-Japanese immigrants and their American children were detained during World War II after Japan’s sneak attack on Americans in Pearl Harbor. Pelosi also urged Obama

Obama´s politicized, lawless executive branch
24 replie(s)
Washington Examiner, by David Limbaugh    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/10/2014 4:29:52 PM     Post Reply
Under the administration of President Obama, as never before in my lifetime, there is reason to be a bit afraid of the federal government. I have written two books documenting Obama´s abuses of power, his assaults on the Constitution, his wars against business and energy, his abominably reckless spending, his divisiveness, his renegade Justice Department, his regulatory expansion, his executive orders, his overall lawlessness, and more. Obama´s conduct concerning Obamacare alone would be enough to get the impeachment wheels rolling for any other president. His flagrant, deliberate lies regarding almost every aspect of that


Post Reply   Close thread 707572





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google



© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS