 A Message From Lucianne
Now More Than Ever Get Your Eagles Up! Lucianne Tees - in Black or White Click to Buy
|
|
White House Insider: Second Debate: Obama Won – But Romney Didn’t Lose
Ulsterman Report, by Ulsterman
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:earlybird, 10/17/2012 11:39:45 AM
|
| A brief update from a longtime D.C. political operative shows calm in the storm that is the final weeks of a presidential campaign – and regarding last night’s most recent debate between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney, the sentiment appears to be NO WORRIES. (Snip)Obama won. Just deal with it and move on. I’d call it a toss up until the moderator stopped the governor’s momentum on Benghazi. You already did something on that yourself. That was about as blatant a moment of media bias smack in the middle of a debate that I can recall.
|
Comments: WHI interview goes on to state that Romney's people acted with strength and class, not whining about the bias. WHI gives them a lot of points for that and believes the audience that watched the debate knows what happened.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
oriton, 10/17/2012 11:57:55 AM (No. 8940101)
obama won is the spin for the day. He didn't win, he just didn't completely lose. Yet, he is still a loser. I'm convinced the media folk want to build up to the next debate to boost their ratings up to get more people to watch the next debate. They run the risk of turning off viewers.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
JAN, 10/17/2012 11:58:17 AM (No. 8940103)
Candy was Obamao's teleprompter.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
lylacat, 10/17/2012 11:58:48 AM (No. 8940105)
I was happy to see the Luntz focus groups see all the wonderful potential in Romney after the debate. Most of them had voted for 0bama in 2008, but now changed to Romney. Unlike the owners of "0bama phones," all these people who possess these FREE phones used them to Tweet they want to kill Romney, because they might lose their Food Stamps and Free Phones. How sick has this society become?
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
awen, 10/17/2012 11:59:31 AM (No. 8940108)
Good lands. Obama did not win. But they'll say it all day long until they believe their own lies. The best sign of Obama's loss? The focus groups.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
IdahoSky, 10/17/2012 12:03:37 PM (No. 8940120)
First rate analysis. Should be a Must Read.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
curious1, 10/17/2012 12:23:33 PM (No. 8940172)
#3, what's hilarious about those morons is that don't realize they're going to lose them anyway when the economy collapses. I just hope R&R can stave it off a few more years. But with over 200 trillion of federal debt, that amount isn't going to be paid off in current dollars, ever.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
FunOne, 10/17/2012 12:24:24 PM (No. 8940175)
The fact is, Romney did not compete against Obama. He had to compete against the tag team of Obama and Crawley, and he was successful in doing that.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
shalimar, 10/17/2012 12:28:50 PM (No. 8940188)
Very hard to square this analysis with the focus group we saw on Hannity after the debate.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
harper, 10/17/2012 12:28:56 PM (No. 8940189)
Obama was declared the winner last week, so that's no surprise. I have to admit the Crawley/Obama team was as effective as the Rattass/Biden team at steamrolling and controlling the process.
Poor Jim Lehrer. He will go done as a failure for not carrying his lifeless team member across the finish line in a way that could be argued as a win. Will he be merely shunned or outright banned for his failure?
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Kurto, 10/17/2012 1:18:42 PM (No. 8940327)
Romney won the debate. 0bama made a lot of noise and kicked up dust, but he did not make any points. Intellectually, he was still an empty chair.
The left-media knows 0bama is finished. That's why they stacked the deck in his favor and sent in Candy 'Refrigerator' Cowley to block for him.
Romney won, brilliantly.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
starbaby, 10/17/2012 1:34:07 PM (No. 8940353)
#2, Indeed. Re: Fast and Furious, a bit of the transcript from the debate:
ROMNEY:... I'd like to understand who it was that did this, what the idea was behind it, why it led to the violence, thousands of guns going to Mexican drug lords. OBAMA: Candy?
CROWLEY: Governor, Governor, if I could, the question was about these assault weapons that once were once banned and are no longer banned.
As WHI said, so obvious.
Transcript: http://tinyurl.com/caraczs
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
earlybird, 10/17/2012 2:24:59 PM (No. 8940494)
An Update from the White House Insider has been added to the original article since it was posted. It begins:
*****UPDATE*****
This just came from Insider:
Have a heads up for you. This comes directly from the Old Man. Military intelligence may have tracked location of a guy called “Khattalah” who apparently organized the Benghazi attack. Check media reports for name. Obama to order drone strikes or possible all out bombing operation. Says it appears imminent. Obama will then make claim “perpetrators brought to justice” to squash Benghazi questions and play part of hero. “Bin Laden Version 2 “ If accurate, this scenario would fit with the earlier rescue operation scenario you had sent me earlier. That went to sh-t so now they are recalibrating the same general idea with an updated version of it.
Go to article to read full update. And Google Khattalah - WSJ has an article today that can be read at Google but not posted as it is subscriber content.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
earlybird, 10/17/2012 2:46:48 PM (No. 8940548)
OK. He said to watch for news reports. Here's the New York Times David Kirkpatrick breaking this story, just posted:
Libya Singles Out Islamist as a Commander in Consulate Attack, Libyans Say
lucianne.com/thread/?artnum=707346
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
pineledger, 10/17/2012 3:01:18 PM (No. 8940582)
Wag the dog.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Quaestio, 10/17/2012 3:05:34 PM (No. 8940594)
So they'll try to do it before next Monday so he can brag about it at the debate.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Aria, 10/17/2012 3:09:48 PM (No. 8940608)
Well I hope our ambassador and the other 2 Americans don't mind giving their lives for the attempted re-election of a Marxist set out to destroy this country.
Obama is going to explode this country and as a communist agitator I'm sure that will be fine with him.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
andyboy, 10/17/2012 3:13:04 PM (No. 8940614)
Even if the Gov't claims (accurately or falsely) to have found the perpetrator and starts bombing, that does not erase the fact that Obama and his administration knew from the outset that the 9/11 attack was a planned al-Qaeda hit, and engaged in a deliberate two-week cover-up to avoid bad PR, blaming everything instead on an idiotic YouTube video.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
udanja99, 10/17/2012 3:28:05 PM (No. 8940643)
No matter what, this will be nothing more than a 'wag the dog' and zippy and his crew will still have lied about it for weeks. I seriously doubt anyone will change his vote over a bombing at this late date. And it will reek of desperation.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
red923, 10/17/2012 3:28:40 PM (No. 8940645)
Love that Lucianne is posting Ulsterman. Things are going to get scary in the next 3 weeks.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
Jebediah, 10/17/2012 3:29:47 PM (No. 8940649)
What an ass!
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
woofwoofwoof, 10/17/2012 3:30:57 PM (No. 8940651)
And that will bring Stevens back, right?
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
joeyinempirestate, 10/17/2012 3:35:36 PM (No. 8940661)
Big deal, another aspirin factory job a la BillyJeff, but the economy still stinks. We are not that gullible.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
J F Ackerman, 10/17/2012 3:36:20 PM (No. 8940664)
Look, an October Surprise is, and always has been, baked in the cake. Adicice to Mitt: Be ready for what ever it may be and react calmly and presidentially.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
fb2002, 10/17/2012 3:41:03 PM (No. 8940677)
Ambassador died, Obama lied and then flew off to Vegas, then lied on the View, to the General Assembly, to the Univision team and to Letterman. What is wrong about the above?
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
StormCnter, 10/17/2012 3:45:40 PM (No. 8940683)
Sorry, but I do not believe a word of this.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
chicodon, 10/17/2012 3:51:01 PM (No. 8940691)
I wish I could dig up my old post from the day after the first debate. I postulated that Obama had to head into the foreign policy debate with a foreign policy success story. I guessed it would be a Libya retaliatory strike. So today, according to Ulsterman, we hear that the consulate attack mastermind “Khattalah” has been found! If it's true, I'm now guessing that “Khattalah” will be blown to smithereens and his body parts submerged next to Osama. The alternative is that Libya already has him under arrest and there will be a colorful show trial. Of course the credit will go to Obama. Whatever it is it will be a staged event. We'll see.
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
kofcfn, 10/17/2012 3:53:01 PM (No. 8940692)
I would have been more bruttle than Mitt ast night. I would have said to Candy, "Ms. Crawley, I know that President Obama is a little boy, but still you are not allowed to help him".
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
AppleAnnie, 10/17/2012 3:53:06 PM (No. 8940693)
Re ***ALERT***, a military strike is right up the Chicago crowd's alley, and just like Bill Clinton who hit an aspirin factory and couple of tents. We'll deal with whatever comes.
Meanwhile, higher ups in the intelligence community are reportedly outraged over Obama's treatment of Benghazi last night on top of his continued attempts to blame them for the debacle, ''We didn't know.'' Reports say some are ready to blow him out of the water.
Obama and Hillary are playing with fire. Four of our own were killed and important people are not happy.
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
VAfreedomluver, 10/17/2012 3:54:07 PM (No. 8940695)
Exactly what good does Obama think throwing a bunch of bombs around Libya will do? A large percentage of the population there is pro-American, with only a relatively small Islamist presence there. Any bombing campaign will make the situation there massively worse.
If Obama does this, Romney needs to oppose it in the worst way. There are ways of getting the perpetrators of the attack without a bombing campaign. It's obviously a "wag the dog" move, and I sincerely hope Romney has the stones to point out the foolishness of such a move, if it happens.
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
ZurichMike, 10/17/2012 3:55:12 PM (No. 8940700)
I don't believe a word of this at all. So Obama and Rice said it was a video, then a terrorist attack, then it was Hillary's fault, and now Barack will fire a drone? So it wasnt' a video and he lied at the beginning? I don't think the US has enough military presence anywhere at the moment to launch the kind of assault Obama thinks will save his skinny butt. If I recall, the intelligence gathering in Libya was and is a shambles, and I am guessing this Bin Laden II fellow is somewhere far in the desert away from prying eyes.
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
StormCnter, 10/17/2012 3:56:42 PM (No. 8940705)
Why would Obama drop bombs inside Libya when he and Hillary refused to send additional security and reinforcements to the consulate because of the fear of offending the new Libyan government? Now we are to believe he's going to drop bombs instead?
Nah.
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
yottyhere, 10/17/2012 4:02:44 PM (No. 8940721)
I agree with #25 and 30. Don't believe this at all.
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
joeyinempirestate, 10/17/2012 4:24:49 PM (No. 8940768)
A dark-complected Arab or two with beards like Jerry Garcia will get buried at sea in accordance with Muslim tradition, no DNA in sight, this is laughable.
|
Reply 34 - Posted by:
O.S. Banker, 10/17/2012 4:31:09 PM (No. 8940783)
Now maybe I am thinking too much in the first world, but if I had masterminded the Benghazi attack, I think I would be keepintg an eye on the nets to see if my name was coming into play. And if I saw this you can bet that I would be running far and hiding deep.
|
Reply 35 - Posted by:
jorgecito, 10/17/2012 4:33:03 PM (No. 8940788)
Re "update" at #12:
...Obama will then make claim “perpetrators brought to justice” to squash Benghazi questions and play part of hero...
Obama can try to make that claim. But it's 4 lives too late.
Why were our personnel in Benghazi deliberately left unprotected in such an obviously dangerous time? Whether an alleged perpetrator is vaporized by a drone, or not, that question still remains -- and will forever remain a blot on Obama's pathetic record.
|
Reply 36 - Posted by:
Calvinesq, 10/17/2012 4:35:15 PM (No. 8940794)
While my gut is with #25, #30, #31 and #32, I have another question: Suppose Obama orders a drone strike, killing, say 50 people. How the hell are we supposed to know whether he got the real bad guy? Are you kiddin me?
|
Reply 37 - Posted by:
Holeymoses, 10/17/2012 4:39:27 PM (No. 8940801)
Not unexpected move, however, the public is becoming so jaded, that anyone who switched from Obama at this point, isn't going to switch back simply because he ordered a few drones. With the way his luck is going, he'll probably hit a few innocent civilians in the process and get bad press.
|
Reply 38 - Posted by:
NuGoddess, 10/17/2012 5:10:21 PM (No. 8940868)
Not from Missouri but, IMHO, Ulsterman does not reveal his ''sources'' so anything he says/writes I consider conjecture.
I believe we are being played.
|
Reply 39 - Posted by:
mabelkitty, 10/17/2012 5:21:30 PM (No. 8940880)
Obama used a drone strike to kill an American on foreigh process without due process.
This does not impress me and will only anger his base, as I agree with the Dems that this is a very slippery slope and very bad policy.
Therefore, bring it on.
|
Reply 40 - Posted by:
Avogadra, 10/17/2012 5:28:12 PM (No. 8940895)
According to Lame Cherry, and implied in an earlier posting by the White House Insider, the Obama administration left Benghazi unguarded because they expected the Libyans to kidnap the ambassador. Then in an October surprise, Obama would get the ambassador released, maybe by doing a trade for the blind sheik or maybe by doing some sort of air strike and terrorizing the Libyans.
A little hitch happened when the ambassador was unexpectedly killed and sodomized, or perhaps sodomized and killed. Anyway, if these sources are correct, Obama is now going to the air strike scenario for revenge. Obama keeps saying over and over that these people will be brought to justice, and even if he only manages to blow up a tent and a camel, the MSM will back him when he says he has taught Al Qaeda another lesson. And voila, a new and shiny foreign policy triumph for our brave president.
|
Reply 41 - Posted by:
Susannah, 10/17/2012 5:48:14 PM (No. 8940920)
Sorry, but I just can't accept as quite credible an anonymous blogger who claims to have such highly-placed sources inside Wall Street, the White House, and the Pentagon. And his dialogue sounds straight from Clancy or Ludlum.
|
Reply 42 - Posted by:
GO3, 10/17/2012 6:01:28 PM (No. 8940938)
"Military Intelligence" is a branch in the US Army, not a specific organization. Until his sources are narrowed down a bit from the all powerful military intellgence machine, I view this as BS.
|
Reply 43 - Posted by:
PLPointer67, 10/17/2012 6:13:42 PM (No. 8940956)
The new update not withstanding... What I like about Ulsterman's original story about 0 winning the debate, is his multiple references to: "Just deal with it and move on." There really isn't any time before the election to waste time with 'what if's.'
We need to say, 'It is what it is,' and move forward with the truth, as it appears the Romeny/Ryan team is doing. Good for them.
And, before I forget, have you studied the painting/illustration at the top of the story. Wow - SO telling/condemning of the 0 administration.
And, IF the 0 people are manipulating the murder of the four for a political 'bump', may God condemn them to Hell.
|
Reply 44 - Posted by:
susieq1, 10/17/2012 6:29:49 PM (No. 8940979)
Watched some of the debate but could not stand the so called "moderator" ; so turned off to read discussions. And these undecideds, if some one hasn't made up their mind by now then they have a lot of problems. The "moderator" picks the questions, blow me down...this is an all time set up moderator,undecideds and some one knowing the questions before the debate...color me cynical.
|
Reply 45 - Posted by:
LZK, 10/17/2012 7:03:16 PM (No. 8941029)
I'm not familiar with the ulsterman report -- so I don't know what their bias is....
There's that famous clinton word -- "is" -- I wanted to laugh out loud when obama inferred that the Rose Garden briefing was a shining moment in the Bengazi attack. It all depends on what "is" a terror attack -- or any terror attack "is" serious....
They love to play with words. And the candy crawly woman came through loud and clear as biased and opinionated. She isn't running for president -- at least I don't think so... AND I know obama needed her help -- but -- in front of millions of people -- it wasn't a good moment for her. She's lost credibility -- completely....
BTW -- Limbaugh is right about the study done in California. Liberal women are "not" very attractive compared with comservative women. WE conservative women take pride in looking good for our husbands...
LZK
|
Reply 46 - Posted by:
faldo, 10/17/2012 7:13:30 PM (No. 8941038)
Can the Sunday morning television talking heads (Schieffer, Gregory, Wallace, and George Stephy) invite the poor guy that started all this hulabaloo...?
That would be the guy arrested 12 days ago who made this darn video back in June that was seen by about 135 views on Youtube.
Release him--he deserves his 15 minutes of fame, for crying out loud.
|
Reply 47 - Posted by:
3XALADY, 10/17/2012 7:31:35 PM (No. 8941060)
Feel sorry for anyone living in Libya and being named Khattalah! Whether he's guilty or not. The boy president is feeling his oats and needs to feel big again. This may be tantamount to Klintoon lobbing bombs at camel butts in an earlier day.
It is so entertaining when dhimmocrats are in office. Gack.
|
Reply 48 - Posted by:
Garage Logician, 10/17/2012 7:44:46 PM (No. 8941073)
Who is this "whatever" guy and why do we care what he thinks?
Maybe he should take some B12 and rehydrate and get back to us.
|
Reply 49 - Posted by:
OregonBoomerGirl, 10/17/2012 7:45:13 PM (No. 8941074)
Not surprised by any of this. If it happens it will look like just what it is, Wag the Dog, October Surprise, Desperate Attempt to save campaign. And there's always the chance - a big one - it will get screwed up and make things much worse.
Oh, and a Muzzie tried to blow up the Federal Reserve Bldg today - even though Obama has eradicated terrorism, dontcha know. This is exactly what happened here in Portland a couple years ago, when a guy tried to blow up families awaiting the Christmas tree lighting - hundreds of people with babies in strollers, etc. But of course it's a religion of peace that we need to respect. And Obama loves them. Can things get any more screwed up???
|
Reply 50 - Posted by:
trapper, 10/17/2012 7:50:58 PM (No. 8941082)
I read somewhere a while back that CIA knew who these guys were the next day, because they were all over their cell phones talking about it. We have friends in Libya. GOOD friends, thanks to Stevens and others. Friends who would be happy to finger the guys responsible and eliminate their competition. Drones? Bombs? Pure cowboy stuff. Just let the spooks handle it and wait for bad guys to start going permanently missing.
Will Obama order some strikes? Maybe. Will there be some quiet warnings to our friends? Maybe. I still say Benghazi and the video demonstrations were unrelated events. I don't buy the phony kidnap scenario. Obama's crew had advance notice of the video demonstrations and was about to roll out a narrative linking them to American Christian fundamentalists. Crazy? Sure. But how did the Cairo embassy apologize for the video BEFORE the demonstrations began?
|
Reply 51 - Posted by:
cgood, 10/17/2012 8:04:53 PM (No. 8941093)
A true 'wag the dog' scenario won't risk killing innocent civilians because it will be staged.
|
Reply 52 - Posted by:
Paral04, 10/17/2012 8:16:24 PM (No. 8941111)
I bet my empire on the fact that Obama had the questions before the debate. He didn't give the rehearsed answer about Libya so Candy jumped in to help him.
|
Reply 53 - Posted by:
u2phile, 10/17/2012 8:18:52 PM (No. 8941114)
I have been reading the White House Insider for a couple of years now, and it is scary how accurate the reporting has been. So I read with scepticism but keep in mind what is suggested.
Was totally heartened that Candy kept this story alive with her unintented flub last night. The O administration desparately wanted to kill this story before next Monday, now that is not going to happen, and I am wondering what the Clintons are devising? Something is up there. I also don't think that it is out of the question for Obama to go all "asprin factory", if you remember that attack ended up being an embarassment for Clinton.
Encouraged that there are numerous lawn signs in the burbs of Easton PA. These same folks had Obama signs out last election! Way Cool!!!
|
Reply 54 - Posted by:
nevernaught, 10/17/2012 8:23:03 PM (No. 8941119)
Gosh, the way the WH fouls up things I hope they don't bomb Israel, Canada, Mexico or Haiti by mistake. You never know which way the tele-prompter is going to point. By the way, I think he bowled another 39 last night.
|
Reply 55 - Posted by:
ThinkingOutLoud, 10/17/2012 8:56:54 PM (No. 8941148)
Romney won the 2nd debate. Because Obama had a pulse this time, the MSM gives the win to Obama, however, it was all style, no substance. Romney won substance bigtime. The media wants the horse race. They would have declared Obama the winner even if he had sent Joe Biden in his place. Romney will win in a landslide. Oh woe to the Dems, their day of reckoning is drawing nigh.
|
Reply 56 - Posted by:
LadyVet, 10/17/2012 8:58:00 PM (No. 8941149)
I predicted a drone strike this morning, early, before the Ulsterman report. This White House is just so predictable. And Hillary is in the game with all the experience she has at these Wag-the-Dog stunts from the Clinton Admin. I expect a drone strike, or some other strike, before the Sunday talk shows. Early voting starts Monday in Texas.
|
Reply 57 - Posted by:
Dodge Boy, 10/17/2012 8:58:12 PM (No. 8941150)
No worries, folks. I'll just say it again...Romney by 5% in three weeks. But must keep the pressure on Obie.
|
Reply 58 - Posted by:
Lonestar Jack, 10/17/2012 9:22:29 PM (No. 8941183)
Where are DNI Clapper and General David in all this mess?
Oh yes -- executive privilege except there is no executive in the WH.
Lots of privilege and no executive.
|
Reply 59 - Posted by:
killerbee, 10/17/2012 9:39:51 PM (No. 8941197)
So, if the update is correct, then I think those with Twitter accounts should start a hashtag dealing with the rumors in advance. That way it will be so totally obvious that Obama is pulling a fast one he either won't do it or it won't have the same impact. I think he's going to be trying to get out of doing that debate altogether.
Just asking the question gets it out there and it'll have to be dealt with.
|
Reply 60 - Posted by:
GreatPlains, 10/17/2012 9:41:40 PM (No. 8941198)
If the intelligence community " failed " Obama in Benghazi , how can they suddenly be trusted to pinpoint the proper target in a dysfunctional third world country of lookalikes ??? Rush to judgement and pathetic wag the dog spring to mind. And shouldn't the alleged terrorist be given a trial before execution ? Paging the ACLU and Code Pink. CNN says the reason that Mama Milk Dud gave Obama more speaking time is because he's a slow talker. That's hilarious and makes him sound mentally challenged. And like something from a Seinfeld episode.
|
Reply 61 - Posted by:
LC Hoghead, 10/17/2012 9:52:26 PM (No. 8941210)
All we heard after the vice presidential debate last Thursday night was how much good the cackling, slightly unbalanced Joe Biden had done for an Obama campaign that had been rocked by Mitt Romney's overwhelming performance in the first presidential debate. Well, now we know that just isn't the case. Since the VP debate, Romney's increased his lead in Gallup to 51-45%.
|
Reply 62 - Posted by:
ScarletPimpernel, 10/17/2012 10:19:01 PM (No. 8941231)
FTA: "The media is gonna try and spin the “comeback kid” scenario for Obama the next few.......By the weekend a different tune is coming. Of course, there are lots of whispers of plans to alter this outcome. Hit Romney up with a scandal, maybe Obama bombs the f-ck out of Libya just for sh-ts and giggles."
Hit Romney with a scandal?? Good luck with that. It just shows how desperate (and evil) the 0bama camp is at this point, so desperate that I might even suspect 0bama's ratings are much lower than the polls are reflecting.
|
Reply 63 - Posted by:
Crosscut, 10/17/2012 10:54:59 PM (No. 8941294)
If I was a Muslim in the middle-east I would be keeping a tight rectum between now and the next debate. Obama may want to whack a few Muslims to show how tough he is, and he won't be too picky.
|
Reply 64 - Posted by:
danu, 10/17/2012 11:16:33 PM (No. 8941335)
Fast and Furious. *Mummy!!* Benghazi. *Mummyyyy. Get the Rose Garden transcript, Mummy!!! He's picking on me Mummy!!*
Now its: Fasten your seat belts...there's gonna be some 'bumps in the road'. /s/
Dr. Jekyll and Miss Hide.
|
Reply 65 - Posted by:
voldurey, 10/17/2012 11:17:24 PM (No. 8941337)
Surely an autopsy was done on Ambassador Stevens and the other victims? Has anyone heard anything about one? I haven't heard it mentioned, but its a no-brainer given the circumstances. Why has no one asked?
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "earlybird"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "earlybird"
|
Rutgers Basketball Scandal Brings Down AD Pernetti
|
|
Associated Press, by Tom Canavan
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 4/5/2013 8:00:39 PM
Post Reply
|
|
NEW BRUNSWICK, N.J.-- Rutgers´ coaching scandal spiraled deeper Friday, bringing down the popular athletic director and a school vice president while donors threatened to cut off their contributions to New Jersey´s largest public university. The day of mounting troubles for the school began with Athletic Director Tim Pernetti resigning over his failure to immediately fire coach Mike Rice, who was caught on video hitting, kicking and taunting players with anti-gay slurs at practice.
|
Newtown massacre: Gun dealer´s license yanked
|
|
Journal News [Westchester County, NY], by Lee Higgins
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 4/5/2013 7:51:28 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives has permanently revoked the federal firearms license of East Windsor, Conn., gun store owner David LaGuercia, whose shop reportedly sold guns used in the Newtown school massacre and a second Connecticut mass shooting. ATF spokeswoman Deb Seifert told The Journal News on Thursday that she could not be more specific on the reasons LaGuercia’s license was revoked. It was revoked Dec. 20 and the 60-day time frame to appeal has expired.(Snip) In December, LaGuercia said in a statement that he was “absolutely appalled”
|
Riverside: RCC divided on campus president’s sex-offender status
|
|
Press-Enterprise [Riverside, CA], by DEBRA GRUSZECKI
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 4/5/2013 12:46:46 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The anonymous black-and-white fliers that had been pinned to billboards April 1 at Riverside City College to call attention to the student body president as a registered sex offender were nowhere to be seen Thursday.(Snip)But the mood was anything but light inside the Associated Students of Riverside City College building where Doug Robert Figueroa, 40, of Riverside, has served as RCC student body president since May 2012. Students huddled there defended the integrity of their leader. “He’s been a great leader,” student Kendall McCardle said, commenting on his advocacy skills, leadership roles with all three branches
|
After years of lying, ex-honors student admits her role in murder
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Joel Rubin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 4/5/2013 11:45:26 AM
Post Reply
|
|
When Keeairra Dashiell graduated with honors from Crenshaw High School seven years ago, she seemed headed for success. Offered admission into several top colleges, she accepted a scholarship to UC San Diego, leaving behind the often rough, inner-city world of South Los Angeles. But on Thursday, Dashiell´s talent and promise were a distant, squandered memory as the 24-year-old sat handcuffed in a downtown Los Angeles courtroom. After years of lying, she fully confessed to her role in a 2007 murder and, in a deal with prosecutors, pleaded guilty to second-degree murder and attempted robbery.(Snip)Judge Michael Pastor sentenced
|
Police Militarization, Abuses of Power, and the Road to Impeachment
|
|
Accuracy in Media, by James Simpson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 4/4/2013 8:16:47 PM
Post Reply
|
|
These are trying times. Never in the history of this country have we been so weakened and polarized by what many view as deliberate government policy. Now anti-gunners in the U.S. Congress, the Obama administration, and legislatures across the country are seeking to exploit the Newtown tragedy to promote their “gun control” agenda that envisions federal, universal background checks on gun purchases, and that could lead to gun registration and confiscation. At the same time, the increasing militarization of law enforcement, most visibly demonstrated by the growing use of massive, SWAT-type raids on businesses and individuals, sometimes with federal
|
‘Buckwild’ star died of carbon monoxide
|
|
Columbus Dispatch [OH], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 4/3/2013 8:46:26 AM
Post Reply
|
|
An autopsy on Shain Gandee, a cast member of the MTV reality show Buckwild, showed he died of carbon monoxide poisoning, the Kanawha County sheriff’s department said yesterday. The deaths of Gandee, 21, his uncle David Gandee, 48, and friend Donald Robert Myers, 27, on Monday morning were ruled accidental after coroners completed the autopsies.(Snip) The truck was found after the MTV star was reported missing by family members after a late-night session in a local bar.
|
Spain princess to face court in corruption inquiry
|
|
BBC News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 4/3/2013 8:41:10 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Spain´s Princess Cristina has been summoned to appear in court over allegations that her husband misused millions of euros of public money. It is reported to be the first court summons for a direct descendant of the Spanish king. She is King Juan Carlos´s youngest daughter. Her husband, Inaki Urdangarin, denies wrongdoing and has not been charged. He is suspected of having massively overcharged local authorities for organising sporting events.
|
|
Those Irritating Verbs-as-Nouns
|
|
New York Times, by Henry Hitchings
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 4/2/2013 9:51:38 AM
Post Reply
|
|
“Do you have a solve for this problem?” “Let’s all focus on the build.” “That’s the take-away from today’s seminar.” Or, to quote a song that was recently a No. 1 hit in Britain, “Would you let me see beneath your beautiful?” If you find these sentences annoying, you are not alone. Each contains an example of nominalization: a word we are used to encountering as a verb or adjective that has been transmuted into a noun. (Snip) Writing packed with nominalizations is commonly regarded as slovenly, obfuscatory, pretentious or merely ugly.
|
|
Susan Patton Told the Truth
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by James Taranto
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 4/1/2013 1:43:26 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Oops, we forgot all about Women´s History Month. To make amends to the fairer sex, today we introduce our readers to a feminist pioneer. This is Susan Patton. In 1973 she was admitted to Princeton University as part of only the fifth coeducational class in the school´s history. (Snip) On Friday this feminist pioneer found herself transformed into a feminist hate object after the Daily Princetonian student newspaper published her letter to the editor. The paper´s website has been overwhelmed by traffic, so with Patton´s permission we´re reprinting the letter in full:
|
For Westmont College women, sadness fueled an ardor on the court
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Bill Plaschke
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 3/31/2013 3:52:43 PM
Post Reply
|
|
MONTECITO — Her final pep talk wasn´t a pep talk at all. Kirsten Moore was beyond pep. Her final pep talk, given while surrounded by her Westmont College women´s basketball team before the NAIA national championship game, was her chance to say thanks. Moore thanked her team for keeping her soul alive. She thanked them for sitting in the third row for her husband´s funeral, for playing with her infant daughter in the third row of the team bus, for sharing her pain and embellishing her joy. She thanked them for their patience when she was weeping at an unseen
|
The Modern King in the Arab Spring
|
|
The Atlantic, by Jeffrey Goldberg
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 3/29/2013 1:45:13 PM
Post Reply
|
|
It is still, on occasion, good to be the king. It is not necessarily good to be the king of a Middle Eastern country that is bereft of oil; nor is it necessarily so wonderful to be the king during the turmoil and uncertainty of the Arab Spring. (Snip) the king had explained to me the reason for the trip to Karak: he was trying, in advance of parliamentary elections in January, to instruct these tribal leaders on the importance of representative democracy. He wanted, he said, to see Jordanians build political parties that would not simply function
|
LAPD’s New ‘Lieutenants List’ and the ‘Club’
|
|
PJ Media, by Jack Dunphy
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 3/29/2013 12:02:22 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Some years ago, on a warm afternoon in South-Central Los Angeles, I responded to the scene of a drive-by shooting in which a man had been killed. Such crimes were — and remain today — sadly common in that part of town, so much so that my coworkers and I were well-practiced in the routine of preserving evidence, identifying witnesses, and all the other chores uniformed officers are expected to perform (Snip)We had completed those chores and transitioned into the standing-around phase when our watch commander arrived at the scene. He was a newly minted lieutenant,
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
McCain: ´I don´t understand´ GOP filibuster on guns
|
|
Politico, by Jennifer Epstein
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/7/2013 12:18:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Sen. John McCain says he doesn´t understand the threats from some of his Republican colleagues to filibuster a bill on background checks to buy guns. "I don´t understand it," the Arizona Republican said on Sunday of the threat coming from Sen. Rand Paul,Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen. Mike Lee and nine other Republicans. "The purpose of the United States Senate is to debate and to vote and to let the people know where we stand.” "What are we afraid of? ... If this issue is as important as we all think it is, why not take ... it up and debate?"
|
´My bangs are getting a little irritating´: Michelle Obama admits she already regrets her high-maintenance hairdo
|
|
Daily Mail (UK), by Margot Peppers
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: pineledger- 4/7/2013 7:43:42 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Michelle Obama has admitted that she is already tired of the bangs she first sported in January. The First Lady said in an interview with Entertainment Tonight: ´Bangs are a day-by-day proposition. They´re starting to grow out, get a little irritating.´ Still, she hasn´t let her hairdo woes get her down. ´It´s okay,´ she said after her initial complaint. ´We´ll be good.´ The first indication that her hairstyle was becoming a burden came about last weekend, when Malia, 14, was spotted adjusting her mother´s hair during the White House Easter Egg Roll.
|
Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney General´ Comment Was a Gaffe
|
|
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that
|
Christians, here´s why we´re losing our religion
|
|
Fox News, by Craig Groeschel
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: STLstudent- 4/7/2013 5:13:55 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Recent research indicates that the number of people who do not consider themselves a part of an organized religion is steadily on the rise. Interestingly enough, though the number of those religiously unaffiliated is increasing, there is little to no trend in the number of those who express atheist or agnostic beliefs. People aren’t saying they don’t believe in God. They’re saying they don’t believe in religion. They are not rejecting Christ. They are rejecting the church. This begs the question, “Why are we losing our religion?”
|
Mother Of Slain Benghazi Officer To Sean Hannity: ‘They Want Me To Shut Up’
|
|
Mediaite, by A.J. Delgado
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:00:16 AM
Post Reply
|
|
On Friday, Sean Hannity brought Pat Smith, mother of the late Sean Smith, on his radio program. The 34-year-old information management officer was one of four Americans murdered in the Benghazi embassy attack on September 11, 2012. In the chilling interview, a distraught Ms. Smith, in tears, pleaded for answers and spoke of the efforts to silence her. Ms. Smith first relayed how her son, prior to the attack, requested additional security in advance and warned the State Department: He did tell them, ahead of time, he typed it into his little typewriter over there,
|
Broadcasters worry about ´Zero TV´ homes
|
|
Associated Press, by Ryan Nakashima
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Ribicon- 4/7/2013 2:43:40 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Los Angeles — Some people have had it with TV. They´ve had enough of the 100-plus channel universe. They don´t like timing their lives around network show schedules. They´re tired of $100-plus monthly bills. A growing number of them have stopped paying for cable and satellite TV service, and don´t even use an antenna to get free signals over the air. (Snip) Last month, the Nielsen Co. started labeling people in this group "Zero TV" households, because they fall outside the traditional definition of a TV home. There are 5 million of these residences in the U.S., up from
|
Vanishing workforce weighs on growth
|
|
Washington Post, by Jim Tankersley
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:28:59 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Put out an all-points bulletin: Millions of Americans have gone missing from the workforce. Every month that those would-be workers are gone raises the odds that they might never come back, dimming the prospects for future economic growth. The vanishing trend is more than a decade old, but it accelerated during the Great Recession. Throughout 2012, economists held out hope that it had stopped. But then came Friday’s jobs report, and hopes were dashed. The Labor Department reported that the U.S. labor force — everyone who has a job or is looking for one — shrank
|
Hillary Clinton Would Not ´Clear the Field´ for 2016
|
|
New Republic, by Tod Lindberg
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/6/2013 5:22:36 AM
Post Reply
|
|
No one is more preoccupied these days with Hillary Clinton´s 2016 plans than the Beltway political class—not even the former presidential candidate herself. To hear some tell it, her decision will be dispositive for all other Democrats thinking of entering the race. And pundits and reporters aren´t the only ones positing the "The Hillary Factor": No less than the House Democratic whip, Steny Hoyer, told BuzzFeed, “I don´t know that anybody would run against Hillary…. If she runs, she clears the field.” It´s an understandable conclusion, given Clinton´s stature in the Democratic Party and her 70 percent
|
Obama critic apologizes for his ´poorly chosen words´ on gay marriage
|
|
The Hill [Washington DC], by Alexandra Jaffe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/6/2013 12:18:19 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson, considered by some to be a potential Republican contender for president, apologized to Johns Hopkins University for the "poorly chosen words" he used in expressing his opposition to gay marriage last month.“I am sorry for any embarrassment this has caused,” Carson said in the letter, reported in New York Magazine.(Snip) "Although I do believe marriage is between a man and a woman, there are much less offensive ways to make that point. I hope all will look at a lifetime of service over some poorly chosen words.” Carson will remain as commencement speaker at Johns Hopkins,
|
The Secrets of Princeton
|
|
New York Times, by Ross Douthat
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 8:08:09 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Susan Patton, the Princeton alumna who became famous for her letter urging Ivy League women to use their college years to find a mate, has been denounced as a traitor to feminism, to coeducation, to the university ideal. But really she’s something much more interesting: a traitor to her class. Her betrayal consists of being gauche enough to acknowledge publicly a truth that everyone who’s come up through Ivy League culture knows intuitively —
|
Beyonce, Jay-Z celebrate 5th anniversary in Havana, Cuba
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Nardine Saad
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 4/6/2013 8:20:04 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Beyonce and Jay-Z celebrated their fifth wedding anniversary in Cuba this week. The couple, who married on April 4, 2008, took in the sights of Old Havana, visited a school, dined on a rooftop terrace and strolled the fan-filled streets in their island best.(snip).The power couple declined to answer journalists´ questions about their visit to the island nation, but some outlets are reporting that the moguls are there as tourists, though that would be illegal because of the half-century embargo the U.S. has on the Communist country. However, the Miami Herald said Washington has issued special licenses for
|
|

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
FS
|
|