 A Message From Lucianne
Now More Than Ever Get Your Eagles Up! Lucianne Tees - in Black or White Click to Buy
|
|
Is Obama overrated as a candidate?
Washington Post, by Chris Cillizza
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Dreadnought, 10/7/2012 11:51:36 PM
|
| In his closing remarks at the first debate in Denver last week, President Obama uttered the following sentence: “Four years ago, I said that I’m not a perfect man and I wouldn’t be a perfect president.” For anyone who has watched Obama campaign for a second term this year, the phrase is old hat — part of the president’s seemingly self-effacing acknowledgment that he has, is and will continue to make mistakes but that he does so in the service of trying to do the right thing. But the now-familiar phrase took on a different — and more troubling
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
blizzard, 10/7/2012 11:52:14 PM (No. 8917120)
He's overrated as a man...period.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Charactercounts, 10/8/2012 12:01:33 AM (No. 8917129)
Link requires registration.
However, in answer to the question, yes, he is overrated.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
ColonialAmerican1623, 10/8/2012 12:06:21 AM (No. 8917137)
People usually tell you who they are, we just don't believe them. He told us he would stand with his Muzlim brothers. He told us he wouldn't be a perfect prez. He also said he was a choomer. Many didn't believe him and voted for him anyway. Now they will repeat the same mistake. They just happened to see the real Zippy on stage in the first debate.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Northcross, 10/8/2012 12:06:24 AM (No. 8917138)
Why the heck didn't you ask this question four years ago?
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
chance_232, 10/8/2012 12:06:49 AM (No. 8917139)
He was over rated in 2004, he was over rated in 2008 and he's over rated today. It was the press that insisted that 0bama was the light bringer, g-ds gift to the masses, smartest man on earth. 0bama didn't "defeat" or "outmaneuver" Hillary Clinton. The truth is that the press destroyed her while ignoring anything negative about 0bama.
0bama is the creation of the media. He is no more "presidential" material than Martin Sheen. 0bama is a creation, a facade, a myth. Obama IS Styrofoam Greek columns.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
bobgray2, 10/8/2012 12:07:14 AM (No. 8917141)
We have today's "duh" question.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
MtGardenerview, 10/8/2012 12:17:19 AM (No. 8917152)
He is overrated as a human, should face theft charges for stealing oxygen
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Safari Man, 10/8/2012 12:28:44 AM (No. 8917158)
If I am not mistaken, Cillizza is a reliable fanboy of Obama. I am noticing that, since the debate, it seems to be popular to pile on the Obama basking wagon. Let's hope this keep up. We're gonna need a big victory to overcome the Chavez-style fraud the dims have planned.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
mitzi, 10/8/2012 12:33:53 AM (No. 8917160)
Is this a trick question?
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
dragon, 10/8/2012 12:45:33 AM (No. 8917168)
Beat me to it #10.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Photoonist, 10/8/2012 12:47:37 AM (No. 8917169)
Like all Marxist socialists, IMO the people pulling his strings tend to get bored with prepping 0bama with the right programming and just fill him with a serving of praise and some platitudes and send him out while they concentrate on looting the system and enslaving the masses. Oops, 0bama fell over. Time to prop him up again. But it might be too late.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
bluehouse, 10/8/2012 12:53:25 AM (No. 8917175)
Obama is not a candidate. He is the sitting POTUS. He should be judged on his record as POTUS.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
stablemoney, 10/8/2012 12:54:26 AM (No. 8917176)
They call him Zero.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
saraguay, 10/8/2012 12:54:56 AM (No. 8917177)
read all the comments at the end of the article. there are still an awful lot of obama lovers and romney haters out there. i just wonder why, if romney lied so much during the debate, pres. obama didn't question the lie and correct it. clearly, he can't think on his feet. all he can do is read the teleprompter and give silly interviews with silly people. let's see some brilliance. i haven't seen it once in all these 4 years of this president.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Dante, 10/8/2012 1:00:06 AM (No. 8917181)
'Overreted' doesn't capture it. He's a Pontiac Aztec which was forced upon us as a Maserati.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
glcinpdx, 10/8/2012 1:32:44 AM (No. 8917212)
Et Tu. WaPoo?
How sharper than a serpents tooth it is to have an ungrateful Journ-O-Lister...
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Spidey, 10/8/2012 2:26:43 AM (No. 8917237)
The left and media bought their own baloney and hype about Obama,that's why they're so shell shocked about Obama's debate performance.Matthews couldn't figure it out because Obama's IQ is in the stratosphere.
The whole reason for Obama being president is redistribution.Without that as a theme,he's lost. He did manage to attack rich people but it was clumsily delivered.
There's no way Obama is going to be prepared for the next debate without getting the questions ahead of time.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Oriton, 10/8/2012 4:05:45 AM (No. 8917257)
I recall oblamo saying more like he was the second coming, not that he was imperfect and would be an imperfect president. Something about the seas responding to his anointing...
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Bjnealeigh@aol.com, 10/8/2012 4:52:42 AM (No. 8917264)
Yes indeed. He is a typical nitwit democrat!
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
srhcb, 10/8/2012 6:03:24 AM (No. 8917289)
Is the WaPo overrated as fish wrap?
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
shamus, 10/8/2012 6:03:39 AM (No. 8917290)
Obama doesn't rate.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
JLoophole, 10/8/2012 6:43:29 AM (No. 8917308)
I guess this is what passes for "shock factor" headlines in the WaPo. Next thing you know, they'll tell us about this really cool show they discovered, called "Lost", and a singer named "Taylor Swift" and a store called "Costco".
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
uno, 10/8/2012 7:07:32 AM (No. 8917328)
Overrated and more importantly, unvetted.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
steveW, 10/8/2012 7:11:04 AM (No. 8917331)
I still think he is a perfect man and a perfect president. I think this because I get my hard-hitting, objective news from the mainstream media, and they not only tell the truth but not once have tried to cover-up or lie for President Perfection. Not once! It's so great that we have such a free press, that when Eternal Perfection comes along in the form of socialist mulatto with a teleprompter, that this free press is brave enough to proclaim His perfection for four whole years without the slightest little tingle of dissent! It's just awesome, as is He.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
JAN, 10/8/2012 7:23:37 AM (No. 8917352)
This person has not accomplished a single thing for the good of the country in his entire presidency.
Oh but it could have been worse just doesn't cut it.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
dadawg, 10/8/2012 7:26:04 AM (No. 8917357)
The writer is as close to objective as one can be and keep their job at WAPO. If it wasn't for WAPO owning a for-profit "university" they would be bankrupt. We need an obscene profits tax on Kaplan since it gets most of its revenue from government student loans.
I keep expecting Jake Tapper to get fired from ABC at any time for the crime of sometimtes pulling back the curtain on the all powerful Wizard of Odd. UpChuck Todd and the rest of the Andrea Mitchells at NBC are really getting testy these days. I guess the Obama bundlers who (COMmmunistCAST)own them are putting pressure on them to turn this thing back around. Everyone needs to buy a "Journalists for Obama" tee-shirt. A lot of the Dims don't even know its a joke, but if we don't turn out to vote, the joke will be on us again.
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
Phooey, 10/8/2012 7:27:39 AM (No. 8917359)
#25 Ouch!
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
Janjan, 10/8/2012 7:31:28 AM (No. 8917362)
Don't get too excited over the sudden media enlightenment. The second debate is a 'townhall' that will be heavily stacked with birkenstock liberals all stoked up with handwritten gotcha questions. The media are too heavily invested in this election to let him lose now. Romney will need to make fools out of Obama and the audience.
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
sorosisbehindit, 10/8/2012 7:42:02 AM (No. 8917383)
I think what we are seeing from the press is not even buyer's remorse. It is a scramble to rescue their own credibility. Picture a used car salesman trying to sell a shiny sports car that he knows has been in a flood and needs major mechanical repairs. While on a test drive the muffler falls off on the road. Does he continue to draw the eye to the great color and leather seats, or does he express his disgust at his mechanics for not being more diligent and then guide the customer to another car. If he continues to say this is a fine car, the customer will no longer trust him. The press is just trying to critique O in hopes of regaining the respect of their readers. They have hopes of selling them many cars over the years. #5 is right. O is the competent reader of prepared speeches. He is not, and never was a genius or superior politician. He had all the required elements that the puppet masters needed. Then 911 happened and they realized that his name was going to be a problem. But they pressed on anyway because their investment had been so great and it still had the potential for success.
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
TXspyder, 10/8/2012 8:05:10 AM (No. 8917434)
Bear=woods, pope=catholic, connect the dots.
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
Jebediah, 10/8/2012 8:09:04 AM (No. 8917440)
He is our own personal Hugo Chavez however: look out for the Chicago methodology. Already a scandal re: foreign (and accepted) campaign donations, the business re: the WARN notices for layoffs, with Obama promising to pay for any lawsuits that result for lack of compliance, no i,d. to vote, military not getting material for voting despite huge amounts of $ being spent to guarantee it, etc. etc. etc. This will NOT be an honest election.
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
Bad Dog, 10/8/2012 8:10:47 AM (No. 8917443)
Well, Chris, dammit! Why don't you look into his background NOW?! Stop telling us how you've been staring at your dang belly button, and BE A JOURNALIST for cryin' out loud!
Plenty of good people before you - LONG BEFORE YOU - have figured this guy out, and you just ridiculed us. You expect us to believe YOU'RE one of the Super-Smarts in charge of shaping our opinions? In your wet dreams, buddy.
Now, pull your head out, and get busy! I dare you to publish what you find out there - it's not that difficult, and it's voluminous! Forget your cocktail party tonight - those people have steered you wrong, you dope.
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
zephyrgirl, 10/8/2012 8:21:07 AM (No. 8917457)
"He doesn't throw punches." Riiiiight. Except when someone can't answer back, like the SCOTUS and Paul Ryan, or when he's standing in front of his Hollywierd buds.
|
Reply 34 - Posted by:
ocjim, 10/8/2012 8:22:45 AM (No. 8917464)
''Four years ago, I said that I’m not a perfect man and I wouldn’t be a perfect president.''
Reeked of false modesty the moment he said it. Among his catalog of poor character traits, being disingenuous is among the most prominent.
|
Reply 35 - Posted by:
nonsense, 10/8/2012 8:23:23 AM (No. 8917466)
I wonder if the Zero has an A.B. Normal brain. It is not capable of remembering facts, figures, etc. about our economy, domestic policy, and so much more. So he just Alinskyfies everything and hopes it will cover his lack of cognitive ability. The severe lack of functioning brain cells is hi-lighted by a debate format.
Also wondering if they will chemically enhance him for his next performance and he will be so over the top that it will make heads spin.
|
Reply 36 - Posted by:
ocjim, 10/8/2012 8:24:33 AM (No. 8917469)
#34, What you are describing is a bully and a coward. I concur.
|
Reply 37 - Posted by:
Jebediah, 10/8/2012 8:36:31 AM (No. 8917485)
And the Press has gone way too far to rescue its credibility re: Obama. With the excerption of a few, like Jake Tapper at ABC who manage to be decent, they are so in the bag as to be laughable........take NBC in general, for example, with the leadership of Brian Williams and Tom Brocaw------in their own way they are as terrible as a Chris Matthews, maybe even more so because they are supposedly giving us "straight" news and not raging opinion. Just look at the fact that NBC under Williams had to tap dance like mad re: Holder's indictment, as they had mentioned Fast & Furious just once over the past year!
|
Reply 38 - Posted by:
LZK, 10/8/2012 8:40:29 AM (No. 8917495)
Looks like the lefties are choking on their "eye candy"....
LZK
|
Reply 39 - Posted by:
maryc, 10/8/2012 8:49:46 AM (No. 8917509)
Only if you expect for America to survive.
|
Reply 40 - Posted by:
cheese, 10/8/2012 9:15:08 AM (No. 8917549)
I think the media is beginning to show its immaturity. Like the youth of today, the media wants ALWAYS to be first first first, because to have something RARE is to be the coolest in the room. Just like the teenager or young adult who will spend crazy amounts of money on trendy and expensive clothes, the media wants to be at the top of the trends, too.
The newest trend is to express doubt in Obama and question his ability to lead. It makes you look oh so wise if you're a far lefty. It has nothing to do with wanting to look more conservative or give approval to Romney, it's simply something different, and therefore, rare. "Oh, Obama, he's SOOOOO 2008!" Rarity = coolness. Even Saturday Night Live has been part of this trend, trying to look so prescient and wise.
|
Reply 41 - Posted by:
Holeymoses, 10/8/2012 9:26:24 AM (No. 8917575)
It looks like the writer is just dipping his toe in the critical waters. I still feel some awe there, definitely not an aahhhh.
|
Reply 42 - Posted by:
steveracer, 10/8/2012 9:27:38 AM (No. 8917583)
A lot of things are overrated like journalism. Don't blame Barry the BS artist for your malpractice.
|
Reply 43 - Posted by:
gaeditor, 10/8/2012 9:34:12 AM (No. 8917595)
Great posts, guys!! Yessir, #39.
The left is just filled with empty-headed, shallow, silly nitwits. Obama is "young, good-looking (??), can read well, is brilliant, a law professor (not), went to the right schools, etc etc"
All of which are hollow nothingness. None of which is related to doing a good job as anything, including -especially- as president.
They love actors too (I used to be one -a pro) and that I don't get. Actors read what other people have written -they may be good at that, but it doesn't translate into brainpower or good sense. In many cases, they aren't just not smart, they don't have the sense to tie their own shoes. But the left "admire" them. And actually listen to them. (Think for a moment of Sean Penn in that boat in New Orleans. Right?)
The left are all silly, shallow people. The Obama debacle has been a eye-opener for some, maybe even Chris Cillizza (probably not). May be some good news there.
|
Reply 44 - Posted by:
cgood, 10/8/2012 9:58:11 AM (No. 8917663)
Just another lib journalist pointing out Obama's 'faults' which are actually positive traits. Chris claims that Obama is a poor faker and is probably just too darn analytical to be able to throw out statements that he hasn't oh so carefully considered. What a smackdown. \s
|
Reply 45 - Posted by:
Arby, 10/8/2012 9:58:24 AM (No. 8917666)
He is overrated on every scale imaginable. Earth to the LSM: he's never done anything in his life except run for office. There's no there, there. The emperor has no clothes. He's the man behind the screen. Take away his TelePrompter and he's dead. (I'll stop now; call me if you begin to get the leg tingles.)
|
Reply 46 - Posted by:
Aunt Agnes, 10/8/2012 10:13:47 AM (No. 8917716)
No.s 41 & 45 said it right. Lefties like to project their own "good intentions" & bad luck stories on the chosen few they vote for. Shallowness & the "cool" factor are actual job qualifiers for dems. I'll take it one further, I know an extreme lib who was very impressed with BO's books - BO had an aboriginal name, a citizen-of-the-world upbringing & he took drugs to expand his "awareness." This made him a special kind of exotic rebel - unbound by normal, white-bread conventions! These loser qualities are what appealed to this particular lib. In other words - they had a lot in common & he was voting for someone who was no better than he was.
|
Reply 47 - Posted by:
pineledger, 10/8/2012 10:15:16 AM (No. 8917722)
This getting full credit for "trying" is something that is ingrained in certain segments of our population. The idea that all you have to do is show up and you get the same result as the guy who actually accomplishes something is the equivalent of not keeping score.
It is pernicious and corrosive to our society. It has to stop.
|
Reply 48 - Posted by:
Old Army Vet, 10/8/2012 10:43:59 AM (No. 8917797)
Obama is overrated period.
|
Reply 49 - Posted by:
NorthernDog, 10/8/2012 11:00:04 AM (No. 8917847)
He's like the Japanese Navy in 1942. Looked awesome until they bumped up against a credible challenge - then they ended up in the bottom of the sea.
|
Reply 50 - Posted by:
Persecutor2, 10/8/2012 11:00:53 AM (No. 8917851)
Looks like Chris is still in the tank and makin' excuses for his pet to me...
|
Reply 51 - Posted by:
BaseballFan, 10/8/2012 11:03:23 AM (No. 8917860)
I was watching the news from Venezuela this morning, with Chavez' 54% victory... interviews were done with people in the streets, and one man saying "We need socialism so we can have a better life."
Those words chilled me to the core. It's happening here. It has to be stopped, or there'll be no going back.
|
Reply 52 - Posted by:
pigop, 10/8/2012 11:09:22 AM (No. 8917877)
The question should have been: As an owner of a business, would you hire him as CEO solely based on his resume?
|
Reply 53 - Posted by:
mulhaven, 10/8/2012 11:21:24 AM (No. 8917910)
Overrated by whom? He is a great speech giver only to those who like sophomoric and empty pomposity. As a candidate he is what he is, a media invention. And they are having an increasingly difficult time trying to pass him off as an accomplished politician (and person). The media failures are reflected in the title of this article.
As far as Bill Clinton is concerned, he is another of their foundlings. Does Chris remember how upset their hero was when he pointed his finger at the public and declared, "I did not have sex with that woman"? Now Chris tells us how magnificent his precious Bill was under duress. What a crock!
These media types certainly can convince themselves of the most insincere thoughts. Does Chris think that maybe they themselves are highly overrated as propagandists?
|
Reply 54 - Posted by:
William1, 10/8/2012 11:27:47 AM (No. 8917928)
Mr. Cillizza may be the town fool in the old west who bought the magic elixir from the snake oil peddler, and bought the same junk upon the peddler's return 4 years later.
|
Reply 55 - Posted by:
artlover, 10/8/2012 11:40:22 AM (No. 8917980)
Some democrat saw him before the time he was elected and thought, this is a good speaker, we can mold him into a person who can take over this country and make it like we want it - liberal through and through. SO someone started programing Obama and now that is what we are seeing. Obama is not a smart man, he is just been programmed like a puppet to say and do things like his handlers want him to be. This is a conspiricy to take over this country by the liberals and they have capured the media and now they have gone with it. It is working, probably even better than they ever dreamed it would. It will continue to work as there are so many stupid people in this country.
|
Reply 56 - Posted by:
Hermit_Crab, 10/8/2012 12:26:19 PM (No. 8918124)
The problem is not that 0bama is overrated.
The problem is that 0bama is UNDERRATED.
As an intentional destroyer of the USA.
Too many of you people think that he has brought all this about because he is incompetent and ignorant.
NO, He has brought this about because he was raised from infancy to hate the USA, Capitalism, and western civilization in general, and is intentionally doing all he can to remake it into a second world marxist / maoist hellhole.
|
Reply 57 - Posted by:
geronimo, 10/8/2012 12:34:17 PM (No. 8918142)
What I have never understood is why people buy the myth that Obama said this, Obama did that, Obama believes such and so.
Obama does not exist. There is a stooge made to look like him, a cardboard cutout at the front of a robot whose controls are manipulated by Valerie Jarrett and her cadre of Muslims and leftists to direct his every movement and program his teleprompter.
Obama was fine with that while rose petals were being strewn in his path. Now that he's the one getting pies in the face, it's not so much fun. He wants to gather his toys and go to Hawaii.
|
Reply 58 - Posted by:
Teleologicus, 10/8/2012 12:36:37 PM (No. 8918146)
All style, no substance.
|
Reply 59 - Posted by:
leopardtwo, 10/8/2012 12:38:22 PM (No. 8918151)
'The latest jobs report is out, showing the economy added 114,000 jobs, beating estimates of 113,000. The unemployment rate fell to 7.8%, the Department of Labor reported, due to the addition of 873,000 people who self-identified as employed. That rate was a sharp drop from the 8.1% a month earlier. Those jobs were mostly part-time in nature. Also, the 7.8% jobless rate understates the problem of the underemployed. What would the unemployment rate be if all the people who want a job suddenly re-entered the workforce? Answer: 11.63%.' - Source: Elizabeth McDonald, Fox Business News
|
Reply 60 - Posted by:
lencu255, 10/8/2012 12:55:32 PM (No. 8918201)
What I am waiting from the repubics to find out the dark forces behind obozo. Because, I think many of you agree with me that obozo is just a convenient front for anti-American cabal. For them he was the front that will speed up the final goal - transformation of America or maybe seizure of power! Not hillary, not many other dems - they were too "American" unlike this person. So, in mine conspiracy theory polluted mind we need to not only win this elections, but find these forces and expose them, so we have the support of majority of Americans to not get in this dire situation again!
|
Reply 61 - Posted by:
lencu255, 10/8/2012 1:09:33 PM (No. 8918238)
Continuing my comment #62. #30 - the media doesn't do "credibility" anymore. Did pravda of voelkischer beobachter do "credibility"? No, they did propaganda under the orders from the Ministry of Propaganda! (which in our case is whoever is behind the scenes. Many of you mention jarrett as a composer and conductor. I think there are mightier forces at the base of this cabal. They needed money and broad base to vet enough of the operatives. I am from former soviet union and they made me study the history of the communist party of USSR. I will tell you this: that kind of movement has to have huge amount of money, places for conspiracy meeting, for storing documents, working on vetting prospective members, etc And our repubics completely missed this!
|
Reply 62 - Posted by:
garyhope, 10/8/2012 1:28:02 PM (No. 8918271)
"Obama IS Styrofoam Greek columns." Perfect, you nailed it #5.
"0bama is the creation of the media. He is no more "presidential" material than Martin Sheen. 0bama is a creation, a facade, a myth. Obama IS Styrofoam Greek columns."
True also. I've been trying to tell my friends that Obama is a fake, fraud and phony for a long, long time. Do they listen,......? No, of course not.
|
Reply 63 - Posted by:
Aria, 10/8/2012 1:29:21 PM (No. 8918273)
Zero has made fools of his ardent supporters and they're not only embarrassed, and mystified, but angry. HA!
|
Reply 64 - Posted by:
radrelic, 10/8/2012 2:49:13 PM (No. 8918463)
His 47% is cracking?
The 47% being his diehards. That 47% deserves some head cleansing.
|
Reply 65 - Posted by:
rmyersne, 10/8/2012 3:39:50 PM (No. 8918603)
The only election he has ever won, without eliminating the competition, is 2008. Freddy Krueger could have beaten McCain with the campaign he ran.
|
Reply 66 - Posted by:
rc1776, 10/8/2012 4:21:07 PM (No. 8918684)
Once I thought there was no number lower than ∅. ∅' blo0 is a class lower and approaching mojo ahmadinejad. The lowest class is of course ∅dimfecal.
|
Reply 67 - Posted by:
dirtydave, 10/8/2012 5:00:17 PM (No. 8918772)
Yep. Sorry, Mom. Yes.
All of that cool, detached brilliance was just so much deer-in-the-headlight bafflement. He's good actor, maybe.
|
Reply 68 - Posted by:
strike3, 10/8/2012 5:32:54 PM (No. 8918841)
Not to insult the guy but I know a lot of animals I would rather have as company.
|
Reply 69 - Posted by:
TruthandJustice, 10/8/2012 7:32:03 PM (No. 8919005)
From the get go...Obama is simply
Being There
Chauncey Gardener
|
Reply 70 - Posted by:
Dodge Boy, 10/8/2012 7:52:27 PM (No. 8919042)
"Is Obama overrated as a candidate?" Does the sun rise in the east every morning?
|
Reply 71 - Posted by:
Beca, 10/8/2012 10:48:42 PM (No. 8919311)
R u kidding. If u have to ask. Why is he overrated. Because press like you have lied to the American people. And presented a guy s Who is a comPlete fraud. Shame
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
|
Ariel Castro, Cleveland Kidnapper, Is a Registered Democrat
|
|
American Thinker, by Oleg Atbashian
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/9/2013 7:28:47 AM
Post Reply
|
|
According to voter registration records, Ariel Castro, the Cleveland kidnapper, is a registered Democrat. He was also the alleged leader among the three Castro brothers, who were arrested this week, and the owner of the house at 2207 Seymour Ave., where the three abducted local women had been kept in captivity for over a decade. Why is this important? Whenever a crime or a scandal captures national attention, the pattern in the mainstream media is to either identify the culprit as a Republican or hold silence -- in which case we can rest assured that the culprit
|
|
Senate defeats expansion of gun rights
|
|
Washington Times, by Stephen Dinan
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/8/2013 11:27:58 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Senate beat back a new push to expand gun rights Wednesday, defeating a plan to let gun owners carry their weapons on federal lands in states where it would otherwise be legal. Still, Wednesday’s vote drew more support than last month’s efforts to impose new gun controls in the wake of the Sandy Hook shooting, suggesting that Second Amendment supporters retain the momentum in the gun debate. The 56-43 vote was four shy of the 60 needed to be adopted under Senate rules. At stake was the ability
|
White House struggles to respond to new Benghazi revelations
|
|
Washington Times, by Susan Crabtree
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/8/2013 11:24:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The White House on Wednesday stood by its story that the Obama administration remained unsure exactly who was responsible for the attack on the U.S. diplomatic post in Benghazi nearly five days after it occurred even though new revelations show Ansar al-Sharia’s direct involvement. Gregory Hicks, the deputy chief of mission at the U.S. Embassy in Libya and a self-described whistleblower, testified before a Congressional committee Wednesday that the body of Ambassador J. Christpher Stevens was missing for hours during the attack after being dragged out of the diplomatic post in Benghazi.
|
At Benghazi hearing, State Dept. officials challenge administration review of attacks
|
|
Washington Post, by Ernesto Londoño and Karen DeYoung
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/8/2013 11:16:28 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Three State Department officials provided a riveting, emotional account of last year’s fatal attack on U.S. installations in eastern Libya on Wednesday as they charged senior government officials with withholding embarrassing facts and failing to take enough responsibility for security lapses. The testimony provided new details on the Sept. 11, 2012, assaults on U.S. installations in Benghazi and their aftermath. But the new information failed to break the political logjam the attacks spawned, with Republicans and Democrats offering starkly different interpretations of what happened and who within the U.S. government is to blame.
|
Obama’s false hopes for 2014 — and his legacy
|
|
Washington Post, by George F. Will
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/8/2013 11:09:49 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Thirty-one months ago Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell affronted the media and other custodians of propriety by saying something common-sensical. On Oct. 23, 2010, he said: “The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president.” He meant that America needed conservative change from the statist course of Obama’s presidency (the stimulus, Obamacare, etc.), therefore America needed a president who would not veto such change. By similar reasoning, Obama today could sensibly say, and probably has said to himself
|
7 Things We Learned from the Benghazi Whistleblower Hearing
|
|
PJ Media, by Bryan Preston
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/8/2013 10:56:03 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Republicans mishandled the Benghazi whistleblowers’ hearing. What should have been stretched across several days to give the nation time to digest it all, was instead packed into a single day filled with an overwhelming amount of information. The media’s attention span is not that long. The verdict in the Jodi Arias trial came along in the afternoon and blew Benghazi off the networks, most of which didn’t want to cover it at all. Even Fox joined the drive-by media, taking Benghazi off the air in favor of the irrelevant Arias trial
|
The Benghazi Hearing: Did It Matter?
|
|
Power Line, by John Hinderaker
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/8/2013 10:52:32 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Today’s Benghazi hearing had many dramatic moments and added significantly to our knowledge of that disaster. For example, we now know that there were multiple instances when special ops would-be rescuers were told to stand down, leading Lt. Col. Gibson to tell Greg Hicks, “This is the first time in my career that a diplomat has more balls than somebody in the military.” Obvious questions remain to be answered: Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton hide behind the military, saying or implying that doing nothing to try to save the besieged Americans in Benghazi
|
Hillary Hasn’t Heard the End of Benghazi
|
|
Commentary Magazine, by Jonathan S. Tobin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/8/2013 10:49:47 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Democrats arrived at the House Oversight Committee’s hearing on the Benghazi terror attack determined to defend the reputation of the person that most believe will be their presidential candidate in 2016. Ranking member Elijah Cummings and his colleagues thundered at Chair Darrel Issa and any other Republican who dared to raise questions about the way the State Department responded not only to the attack but also to questions about the aftermath, determined to cast the entire event as a partisan ambush. But the testimony of the three whistleblowers overshadowed their complaints
|
Benghazi Hearing Aims to Reveal High Level Decision-Makers
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Peace, by Kerry Picket
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/8/2013 8:28:16 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Republicans on the House Oversight Committee say there will be “explosive” revelations that will come forth during the Committee’s hearing on Wednesday when three State Department witnesses reveal what they knew the night the U.S. consulate and CIA annex in Benghazi, Libya were attacked by terrorists. Committee members will be hearing the testimonies of State Department employees Greg Hicks, Mark Thompson, and Eric Nordstrom. The Committee appears to be interested in finding out who ultimately made the decision to tell military assets not to send help
|
Obama says chemical use in Syria is only ‘perceived’
|
|
Washington Times, by Susan Crabtree
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/7/2013 10:05:47 PM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama defiantly defended his reluctance to increase the U.S.intervention in Syria, saying he has yet to receive clear, corroborated evidence to back up initial intelligence reports of small-scale use of chemical weapons by the Syrian regime and would not make a decision based on a “hope and a prayer.” Mr. Obama last summer said chemical use by Syrian leader Bashar Assad would be a “red line” that would change his calculus about authorizing U.S. action in that country’s civil war. Reports last week suggested
|
As red ink recedes, pressure fades for budget deal
|
|
Washington Post, by Lori Montgomery and Zachary A. Goldfarb
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/7/2013 10:03:45 PM
Post Reply
|
|
After four years of trillion-dollar deficits, the red ink is receding rapidly in Washington, easing pressure on policymakers but shattering hopes for a summertime budget deal. Federal tax revenue is up and spending is down thanks to an improving economy, tax hikes enacted in January and the automatic budget cuts known as the sequester. The sunnier outlook means that President Obama will be able to pay the nation’s bills for months without seeking additional borrowing authority from Congress — probably until Oct. 1, according to independent forecasts.
|
Graham: ‘I Think the Dam Is About to Break on Benghazi’
|
|
Washington Free Beacon, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/7/2013 9:55:55 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R., S.C.) wrote Tuesday he believes major revelations about the lead up to the Sept. 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya, are imminent, in a Facebook message: “I think the dam is about to break on Benghazi. We’re going to find a system failure before, during, and after the attacks. “We’re going to find political manipulation seven weeks before an election. We’re going to find people asleep at the switch when it comes to the State Department, including Hillary Clinton.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Republican probe of Benghazi attacks turns to Hillary Clinton
|
|
Washington Post, by Philip Rucker
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/8/2013 6:52:16 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Republican lawmakers, who have spent months seeking to tie President Obama to last year’s deadly attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, are increasingly focusing their probe on a new target: former secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton. The GOP-led investigation of the Sept. 11, 2012, assaults that killed U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three others now centers heavily on the State Department and whether officials there deliberately misled the public about the nature of the assault. Three State Department officials are scheduled to testify before a House committee on Wednesday about the Benghazi attack and its aftermath.
|
Seattle to melt buyback guns into peace bricks
|
|
Associated Press, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: maggie2u- 5/7/2013 1:13:31 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Seattle Police Department collected more than 700 guns during a buyback in January, and now city officials have a plan for what to do with them. Mayor Mike McGinn is expected to announce Tuesday that they´ll be melted into bricks carrying messages of peace, and the bricks will be placed around the city. The buyback program was announced a month after last December´s elementary school massacre in Newtown, Conn., by city leaders sick of hearing about gun violence. Private sponsors including Amazon.com contributed tens of thousands of dollars
|
Sanford gets second chance: On political scrapheap 4 years ago, ex-governor wins 1st district seat
|
|
Post & Courier [Charleston, SC], by Glenn Smith*
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 5/8/2013 12:59:28 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Former Gov. Mark Sanford completed the trail to political redemption Tuesday with a win over Democrat Elizabeth Colbert Busch to reclaim his old seat in Congress. Sanford defeated Colbert Busch 54 percent to 45 percent, according to full unofficial results. Turnout was heavier than expected, with about 32 percent of the district’s 455,702 registered voters casting ballots. Sanford, who has never lost an election, returns to the 1st District seat he held for three terms from 1995-2001. It’s a remarkable comeback for a man many pundits had written off after his highly publicized affair with an Argentine
|
A new ‘Dawn’ at ABC: Newsman becomes newswoman
|
|
New York Post, by Tara Palmeri
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/8/2013 11:26:11 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Top ABC News editor Don Ennis walked into his Manhattan office on Friday in a “little black dress” and a brunette bobbed wig and announced to colleagues that from now on, he would like to be known as Dawn. The 49-year-old father of three said he’s splitting from his wife of 17 years to become a woman, or Dawn Stacey Ennis, as she is now known on her governmental records. “Today I begin anew,” she wrote on her Facebook timeline, where she debuted a flirty new profile picture. “Please understand: This is not a game of
|
Dem Congressman At Benghazi Hearing: "Death Is A Part Of Life"
|
|
Real Clear Politics, by Ian Schwartz
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/8/2013 2:27:15 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD), ranking member of the House Oversight Committee, tells Benghazi witnesses that "death is a part of life." CUMMINGS: And, as I listen to your testimony I could not help but think of something that I said very recently -- two years ago now -- in a eulogy for a relative. I said that death is a part of life, so often we have to find a way to make life a part of death. And, I guess the reason why I´m saying that, going back to something Mr. Nordstrom said, he wanted,
|
Benghazi: Incompetence, but no cover-up
|
|
National Journal, by Michael Hirsh
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 5/8/2013 6:04:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
There was tragic incompetence, plainly, in the Obama administration’s handling of the Benghazi attacks, and even possibly some political calculation. It is a record that may well come to haunt Hillary Clinton, the first Secretary of State to lose an ambassador in the field in more than three decades, if she runs for president in 2016. But the obvious Republican effort to turn this inquiry into the Democratic (Obama) version of the Iraq intelligence scandal that has tarred the GOP since the George W. Bush years -- led by that least-credible of champions, the almost-always-wrong Darrell Issa --
|
Fox Analyst Shreds ‘Cowardly, Duplicitous’ Admin Over Benghazi: ‘Sacrificed American Lives For Politics’
|
|
Mediaite, by Meenal Vamburkar
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/8/2013 11:47:07 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Ahead of the Benghazi hearings in which three witnesses are set to testify before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, Fox & Friends co-host Brian Kilmeade invited Fox News analyst Lt. Col. Ralph Peters to discuss the issue. Peters was unflinching in his criticism of the “cowardly” Obama administration — and the “establishment media” that aids it. “Is this a national security coverup?” Kilmeade asking, explaining that the witness testimony is expected to say the administration was deceitful in its handling of the situation. “The administration, facing the election, went into panic mode, wanted to contain it,”
|
Stephen Hawking backs boycott of Israeli academics
|
|
Associated Press, by Gregory Katz and Aron Heller
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/8/2013 12:08:27 PM
Post Reply
|
|
British physicist Stephen Hawking has dropped plans to attend a major international conference in Israel in June, citing his belief that he should respect a Palestinian call to boycott contacts with Israeli academics. The University of Cambridge released a statement Wednesday indicating that Hawking had told the Israelis last week that he would not be attending "based on advice from Palestinian academics that he should respect the boycott." University officials said they had "previously understood" that Hawking´s decision was based solely on health concerns — he is 71 and has severe disabilities — but had now been told otherwise by Hawking´s office.
|
Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee: Constitution implies a right to health care, education
|
|
Washington Times, by Douglas Ernst
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/7/2013 8:22:18 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee took to the House floor Monday night and implied that the right to health care and education exists in the Constitution. Ms. Jackson Lee, Texas Democrat, also made the case that the moral authority for such services is also derived from the Declaration of Independence. “One might argue that education and health care fall into those provisions of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness,” she said. Ms. Jackson Lee added, “I think that what should be continuously emphasized is the president’s leadership on one single point: that although health care was not
|
Mark Sanford wins South Carolina special election
|
|
Washington Post, by Rachel Weiner
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: supersid- 5/7/2013 8:55:20 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Mark Sanford has won the South Carolina special election in a competitive race for what in normal circumstances is a safe Republican seat. The former governor beat Democrat Elizabeth Colbert Busch, the sister of comedian Stephen Colbert Busch, for the state’s 1st congressional district. The AP called the race for Sanford early in the evening, with the Republican leading Colbert Busch 54 percent 46 percent.
|
|

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
FS
|
|