A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy

































   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


If He’s Lost the New Yorker…
Power Line, by John Hinderaker

Original Article

Posted By:StormCnter, 10/6/2012 6:13:02 AM

…then it is hard to imagine who still believes the myth of Barack Obama. Next week’s New Yorker cover:(Snip for graphic)So I guess it’s unanimous. Clint Eastwood was right. But here is what I don’t understand: why isn’t everyone embarrassed to be a liberal? Or, put another way, a Democrat? How is it that some people can witness the latest liberal fiasco–Romney sneaked a crib sheet into the debate! That’s the only way he could remember all those facts! No one could actually know all that stuff!–and say, hey, I don’t mind associating with those people!

Comments:
The New Yorker cover is creating a brushfire in bloggerville. There's a lot of discussion.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: RosietheObserver, 10/6/2012 6:27:21 AM     (No. 8913591)

The caricature of Romney gives him quite a chin. If you color it in, he looks like Lincoln. I think that's an accident, but subliminally it could have quite a positive effect.


Reply 2 - Posted by: frodocasey, 10/6/2012 6:36:30 AM     (No. 8913597)

I know Romney was good with his facts at the debate but was he that good? - that he needed notes? Maybe you're right, Liberals and I hope you are!


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: srhcb, 10/6/2012 7:07:31 AM     (No. 8913643)

I never missed an issue of "The New Yorker", (and former editor Bill Shawn insisted it be addressed that way), from 1952-87. (I "read" my parents' copy before I could actually read) When they became overtly political I sadly gave up on them.

I'm willing to bet they think the cover is a slam on Romney, by portraying him as imitating Eastwood while their poster boy Obama remains somewhere above the fray.


Reply 4 - Posted by: lakerman1, 10/6/2012 8:48:40 AM     (No. 8913814)

President Romney combined his law school education with his MBA, and added in his real world experience,
(which we used to expect from our presidential candidates) and smoked barack.
I have to wonder if barack even went to class in law school.
And I have to wonder if barack was chewing khat.


Reply 5 - Posted by: capecodfox, 10/6/2012 8:50:55 AM     (No. 8913818)

Clint's chair has legs. Obama fit the narrative perfectly at the debate. Maybe now some of the Dims have finally gotten Clint's point.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Bubbasuncle, 10/6/2012 8:52:29 AM     (No. 8913825)

FTA:" But here is what I don’t understand: why isn’t everyone embarrassed to be a liberal? Or, put another way, a Democrat?" IMHO, two reasons; one, they want to be thought of as reasonable, thoughtful, and caring. Two, if they were to finally admit it would be devastating to realize that one was so wrong for so long.


Reply 7 - Posted by: tnorling, 10/6/2012 8:59:13 AM     (No. 8913838)

Whoa. As said before, if you've lost the New Yorker...


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Maybeth, 10/6/2012 8:59:18 AM     (No. 8913839)

I have a gut suspicion. I'm wondering if the Obama handlers plan to stage a phony 'hero thing' for the president, who will bravely be rescued from 'whatever.'
.... My 'gut' is rarely wrong.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Holeymoses, 10/6/2012 9:06:00 AM     (No. 8913854)

This cover was a surprise. All evidence that the left is angry with a loser, one of them. Axelrod has so much cleaning and pruning to do that I wonder how he gets any sleep at night.

I am sure poor Obama is getting advice (make that "direction") on how to behave on the next round. Too much prodding Axelrod, and you are going to make him petulent.

The world is watching.


Reply 10 - Posted by: LZK, 10/6/2012 9:08:19 AM     (No. 8913859)

The libbies are desperate. The American People are wise to the Chicago mob, i.e. obama and jarret.

The cover doesn't mean a thing to WE the People. It may give solace to the demorats who are whinnnning these days....

The economy will do obama in -- no matter how he cooks the books.... It's tough out here and WE KNOW it....

LZK


Reply 11 - Posted by: Echohawk, 10/6/2012 9:08:28 AM     (No. 8913860)

This is The New Yorker's clever way of warning Obama that he has to do a better job in the next two debates or he is finished.
Remember, too, that those who write for and edit The New Yorker are some of the smartest wordsmiths on the planet. They knew an empty chair when they saw one.


Reply 12 - Posted by: vwlarry, 10/6/2012 9:18:21 AM     (No. 8913877)

Not to worry. The next debate between them is gonna be even MORE fun. Bet on it. King Putt is mega-flustered now and is not equipped to recover, IMO.

Pop LOTS of popcorn. :-D


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: pomom, 10/6/2012 9:22:59 AM     (No. 8913886)

#2, the answer is yes to the fact that he was that good. As far as ''taking notes'', I noticed he scribbled a few notes when Obama started meandering off topic.

I needed a new wallpaper for my computer and now I have it.


Reply 14 - Posted by: sherlock1, 10/6/2012 9:25:39 AM     (No. 8913892)

Obama has been busy convincing his base of lo-info voters that CEOs are overpaid leeches who provide no value, and get by on insider conections.

Oops... one of those drones just mopped the floor with him, and sopped up the mess with a media talking head for good measure.

ps. Don't miss the comments in New Yorker article... most are more scathing on Obama's performance than the picture is!


Reply 15 - Posted by: Douglas DC, 10/6/2012 9:32:16 AM     (No. 8913911)

This is a big deal there is not on elib I know who isn't talking bout this...
Ozymandias time...


Reply 16 - Posted by: M Stuart, 10/6/2012 9:33:10 AM     (No. 8913912)

I'd love to see the New Yorker read Hillbuzz and give us some enlightenment on 0bama's drug use.

Maybe 0bama will make the cover of High Times.


Reply 17 - Posted by: snakeoil, 10/6/2012 9:36:20 AM     (No. 8913922)

The next debate is supposed to be about Foreign Policy. Jug Ears will point out that he killed Osama bin Biden and he won the Nobel Peace Prize. Every 4 years we are told that this is the most important election in American history and usually it's just hype. But if we lose this one I lose my health care in 2014. So it's plenty important to me. Along with I haven't had a pay raise in 4 years and my house is worth less each year. Speaking of debates I'm expecting Plugs to do much better than expected which will validate Clint Eastwood's observation that Ole Joe is the intellectual leader of the demoncraps.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: slab, 10/6/2012 9:37:54 AM     (No. 8913926)

#13, thanks for the suggestion!


Reply 19 - Posted by: tylertexan, 10/6/2012 9:40:27 AM     (No. 8913928)

I was told by our trusty MSM a few weeks ago that the Clint Eastwood bit was a rambling performance by a senile old coot.

Now, what is the one thing nearly everyone (Repub., Dem., Ind.) remembers from either convention?


Reply 20 - Posted by: cake crumb, 10/6/2012 9:41:16 AM     (No. 8913929)

He hasn't lost the New Yorker, though he might have lost the cover artist: every single article about the debate that I saw in that issue wsa pro-Obama.


Reply 21 - Posted by: William1, 10/6/2012 9:45:17 AM     (No. 8913941)

Poster #2, welcome to the site! Too bad we'll never hear from you after the election...

I'll let you in on a deep, dark secret. Romney had a secret radio transmitter sewn into his Magic Mormon Underwear! That's how he really mopped up the floor with The Slug.

O, how the mighty have fallen.


Reply 22 - Posted by: Arby, 10/6/2012 9:51:10 AM     (No. 8913948)

The current New Yorker is nothing like the magazine under Ross. This left-wing rag (with an occasional funny cartoon) has abandoned Fauxbama. Wow, what's next? Mother Jones?


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: tocsin, 10/6/2012 9:53:01 AM     (No. 8913951)

Now it's all up to Candy Crowley & the ''undecided voters'' as selected by(the unbiased)Gallup Organization.


Reply 24 - Posted by: frodocasey, 10/6/2012 10:15:18 AM     (No. 8913990)

replies #13 and #21 - I meant my reply to be completely sarcastic to the Liberals, I should have written it better.


Reply 25 - Posted by: JimS, 10/6/2012 10:17:39 AM     (No. 8913994)

If you are reading this site, thanks Clint!

The USA owes you big time.


Reply 26 - Posted by: ScarletPimpernel, 10/6/2012 10:45:28 AM     (No. 8914043)

I'm going to buy the magazine today. From now until election day, when the weather is good, we'll put the cover in a plastic sleeve and place it on an empty camping chair in front of our lawn. I suggest LDotters around the country do the same!


Reply 27 - Posted by: geronimo, 10/6/2012 11:07:41 AM     (No. 8914089)

This isn't the first time The New Yorker has taken a swing at Obama:

http://www.newyorker.com/online/covers/slideshow_blittcovers#slide=1

They get over it and return to the fold.


Reply 28 - Posted by: Gallo3, 10/6/2012 11:36:07 AM     (No. 8914159)

Breathtaking, this flop of Obama. Never to be forgotten.

The rise of President Romney.


Reply 29 - Posted by: Aria, 10/6/2012 11:44:33 AM     (No. 8914173)

Like any actor zero needs someone to write his lines and is lost without a script. He also is completely dependent on the "star marker" dept - the guys who really ran the "brilliant" campaign in 2008, the publicists, the agents, the trainers, the accountants, business managers, and on and on.

With his actual work record as evidence how could anyone have expected that this man had somehow accumulated any meaningful leadership experience in life before the White House or would bother to apply himself while in the WH?

He was never anything but a reflection.


Reply 30 - Posted by: peterfleming, 10/6/2012 11:58:52 AM     (No. 8914200)

NOW is the time to stop calling all these big oppressive government promoters, the good name of liberal. They are NOT liberal.
They are authoritarian, indivdual oppressing power mad traitors to the truth.
If every good soul simply stops and rethinks
this could change in a few days. Get over your fear to call them what they ARE.
They ARE socialists, statists, collectivists
reds, commies, anti Constitutioalists, not radicals but reactionaries, fellow travelers
Marxists, dictator crazed, believers in ever
larger cureaucracies, more taxes, more jails
more bureaucratic controls, everything needs to be controlled BY THE STATE. They want to close down the internet because they can't control it. Overcome your own personal fears, and try it out in front of the mirror. Try calling them the names above, pretend like you're Ayn Rand. She called them only what they are. She came from Communist Russia, escaped, really under stood how terrifying dictator like governments are to the destruction of the individual and their natural rights. Shape up.


Reply 31 - Posted by: rochow, 10/6/2012 12:01:05 PM     (No. 8914206)

Never buy this 'rag',.... this time I shall and will frame the cover,...who knows, perhaps I should get several and give them as a present to some Dems?!


Reply 32 - Posted by: LC Chihuahua, 10/6/2012 12:31:00 PM     (No. 8914274)

Looks like all the lefties are leaving Obama. Who knew Obama would be thrown under his own bus.

The lefties knew all those skewed polls were lies, and Obama's poor performance only confirmed what alot of people already knew. Obama lies all the time, and nobody likes a liar. The left know Obama is going to lose, and do not want to be dragged down with him.

The left will sacrifice Obama and abandon him before they will ever admit their style of government is wrong.

November 6 is 'Impeach Obama' day.


Reply 33 - Posted by: Fat Elvis, 10/6/2012 12:31:05 PM     (No. 8914275)

Please, if Obama has even a nominally good performance in the next debate, the headlines will scream OBAMA'S BACK!! The media is definitely rooting for him like they root for every democrat.
No matter. Romney is the best choice for the country. Obama has got to go.


Reply 34 - Posted by: Lalo, 10/6/2012 12:33:52 PM     (No. 8914279)

Good point, 31st poster, though I suppose we have to go with the common parlance, unfortunately.

As for Bams - my theory is that Clint's stunning performance put a sort of spell on him and that Romney continued this nailing of him to the wall that Clint began, to the point that he could hardly move or speak. A sort of literal metaphor.


Reply 35 - Posted by: Lalo, 10/6/2012 12:34:23 PM     (No. 8914281)

Ooops.. #30, that is.


Reply 36 - Posted by: snowcloud, 10/6/2012 12:38:37 PM     (No. 8914285)

The same people who think Romney "cheated" with notes are the same ones who think there is nothing whatsoever wrong with a president who can't say gesundheit without a teleprompter. Wow.


Reply 37 - Posted by: risailor, 10/6/2012 12:45:46 PM     (No. 8914301)

If the dopes really believe that Romney had notes (it was a hankerchief), why couldn't he just memorize what was on the notes?


Reply 38 - Posted by: Heraclitus, 10/6/2012 12:46:24 PM     (No. 8914302)

Good reminder, #33; lefties do not really give up... they re-organize.

Great ideas, #s 26 and 31. Especially like the empty chair on the lawn. Just make sure it's a chair you can do without. I fully expect the spoiled-sports to steal and or destroy. Maybe bring it in at night.

Ramirez's cartoon is even more devastating.

I expect the going to get much, much rougher, the lies to fly fast and wildly.


Reply 39 - Posted by: Safari Man, 10/6/2012 1:00:58 PM     (No. 8914327)

#27 I believe that "Fist bump" cartoon was taking a swipe at the right -- they were trying to say how "ridiculous" our claims were about Obama.


Reply 40 - Posted by: 10sgal67 be, 10/6/2012 2:07:58 PM     (No. 8914455)

#8 I have thought about that also. I believe Obama is very dangerous at this point and would try anything to get re-elected. Hope I am wrong.


Reply 41 - Posted by: oriton, 10/6/2012 2:49:59 PM     (No. 8914503)

I hope Mitt mentions in the foreign policy debate how many military people we've lost since obit ramped things up in Afghanistan. It seems that's the only way the news will get out there. obit can brag that he got Osama, and it's still not a fact that "he" got him, but will he take responsibility for the service members who've lost their lives. He doesn't even acknowledge the loss or the sacrifice unless it helps him. And, Mitt should throw in how he, Mitt, not obama, is fighting for military absentee voting extensions in several states.


Reply 42 - Posted by: rc1776, 10/6/2012 3:01:45 PM     (No. 8914520)

The only leftist to the left of the new yorker is dimfecal jaun willyms.


Reply 43 - Posted by: mollybob, 10/6/2012 4:05:43 PM     (No. 8914609)

Glad to know I wasn't the only one who noticed the "Lincolnesque" nature of the caricature. As #1 noted, it was almost certainly unintentional, but those are the kinds of things that often have a strong, if subtle, impact.
As for the rest of it, I'm willing to take the entire matter at face--or in this case, cover--value: The New Yorker mocked Obama. It means he's lost them...for now.


Reply 44 - Posted by: cat2, 10/6/2012 5:34:07 PM     (No. 8914749)

The last time The New Yorker criticized Obama with a cover (showing him and Michelle as Muslims, as I recall), it promptly apologized with a cover equating him with Lincoln, and maybe godhood. Stay tuned.


Reply 45 - Posted by: starboard, 10/6/2012 6:27:13 PM     (No. 8914818)

All the "know it all" pundits are gleefully reporting the Town Hall meeting format favors Obama. Since when? They're always overrating this guy. We saw the real slouch vote present on Wednesday night. Sure, we know they want a horse race, but Romney is not just any horse, He's become Secretariat running in the Belmont stakes. Go Big Red.


Reply 46 - Posted by: jorgecito, 10/6/2012 7:54:32 PM     (No. 8914957)

Yes #45, the New Yorker you mention cover did show Obama dressed as a Muslim. Michelle was in an Angela Davis style get-up, and I believe was holding a machine gun.

When the New Yorker got flak for that cover, they claimed it was "satire," i.e. a joke ridiculing not the Obamas, but the Right -- for our allegedly unfounded fears about the Obama couple.

The irony was that the "satire" was actually very close to reality ... i.e., the Right was right after all.

Wonder if the New Yorker's editors have figured that out now?


Reply 47 - Posted by: ocjim, 10/6/2012 8:40:56 PM     (No. 8914996)

Eastwood Ho!


Reply 48 - Posted by: fhancock, 10/6/2012 9:21:52 PM     (No. 8915048)

Obama is now the object of unadulterated ridicule...He is toast...when the ridicule and reality are the same, there is ZERO chance of recovering


Reply 49 - Posted by: hammondb3, 10/6/2012 9:31:16 PM     (No. 8915064)

#2, AKA #24

I got it on the first read. You did nothing wrong at all. Just came at it from a little different angle than most.


Reply 50 - Posted by: ocjim, 10/6/2012 9:52:29 PM     (No. 8915086)

If Romney repeats in the second debate then we will truly have a very injured, desperate and powerful predator roaming the woods looking for relief, anywhere and anyhow.



Post Reply   Close thread 705296




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"



Is the U.S. becoming
a sham democracy?
Power Line, by Paul Mirengoff    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 6:04:56 AM     Post Reply
Eliana Johnson reports that four Republican members of the Senate Judiciary — Jeff Sessions, Chuck Grassley, Mike Lee, and Ted Cruz — are calling for transparency from their GOP colleagues in the “Gang of Eight” that is drafting immigration reform legislation. In a letter to John McCain, Lindsey Graham, Marco Rubio, and Jeff Flake, the four Judiciary Committee members express concern that an immigration reform bill will be rushed through Congress without proper oversight in the form of hearings and robust debate. They note that the Gang has “secretly met for months” without consulting

Fight for the right
to grow raisins
USA Today, by James Bovard    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 6:00:51 AM     Post Reply
The Supreme Court could soon end one of the federal government´s most archaic practices. Since the 1930s, the Agriculture Department has turned California raisin growers into pawns of its Raisin Administrative Committee, which can commandeer up to half of the farmer´s crop and then pay them little or nothing for the product. Marvin Horne, a 67-year-old raisin farmer in Fresno, Calif., was fined almost $700,000 for refusing to surrender control of much of his harvest to the government committee in 2002. Horne, who has been growing raisins for more than 40 years,

Dirty pols sink Andy
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:55:50 AM     Post Reply
There are many who scoff at Andrew Cuomo’s chances in a presidential primary campaign, but I am not among them. His name is an iconic Democratic brand, he’s forceful on the stump and a prodigious fund-raiser. Besides, somebody has to win the nomination. Of course, there are hurdles. Saint Hillary is gearing up to run, and there will be a scrum among contenders, probably including Vice President Joe Biden, competing just to be Clinton’s top rival. The scenario, then, is daunting but doable — or at least it was,

Discovery Of A 17th Century Spanish
Shipwreck Yields Awesome Treasure
LiveScience, by Marc Lallinilla    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:40:58 AM     Post Reply
A great superpower, weakened by economic calamity at home and staggering under the debt from years of war in the Middle East, finally collapses. A new political best-seller, or an apocalyptic Hollywood blockbuster? Neither — it´s the story told by a 1622 shipwreck whose treasures were desperately needed to shore up the finances of the struggling Spanish Empire. The galleon Buen Jesus y Nuestra Senora del Rosario was one of 28 ships in the Tierra Firme fleet; all were sailing from the New World back to Spain, laden with colonial treasures,

How the ´indispensable man´ became
America´s only six-star general
Washington Examiner, by Joseph Dooley    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:35:55 AM     Post Reply
Historian James Thomas Flexner referred to George Washington as "the indispensable man." Americans all know he was a general, but have you ever wondered what grade of general? How many stars did Gen. Washington have? In today´s Army, a one-star general is a brigadier; two stars is a major general; three stars is a lieutenant general; four stars is just plain general. During World War II, Congress created the five-star general, the modern rank of general of the Army. There had been an earlier grade that was called general of the Army,

South Korea has already won
Washington Post, by Max Fisher    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:26:19 AM     Post Reply
On March 30, three days after North Korea severed a military hotline with the South and announced that South Korean President Park Geun-hye “will meet a miserable ruin,” the country declared a state of war. “The time has come to stage a do-or-die final battle,” an official statement said. Meanwhile, many of South Korea’s youth were worried about something else. A 25-year-old pop star named Seo In-guk had appeared on a popular reality TV show the night before and, in a misstep that quickly dominated online conversations, had washed his strawberries incorrectly. Ilbe, a conservative Web forum —

The Rutgers Scandal Now Has
an F.B.I. Extortion Investigation
Atlantic, by Connor Simpson    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:18:30 AM     Post Reply
If you had an extortion investigation in your "what twists the Rutgers basketball scandal will take next" pool, well, collect your winnings. Also, buy a lottery ticket because you may be telepathic. Because the F.B.I. is investigating Eric Murdock, the whistleblowing former assistant coach, for extortion. University officials let it slip to The New York Times´ Steve Eder that Federal Bureau of Investigation officers recently visited the campus and met with athletic director Tim Pernetti sometime before Pernetti was fired on Friday. They´re trying to determine whether or not Murdock, the former director of player development,

Hollywood’s Come to Jesus Moment?
American Spectator, by Marta H. Mossberg    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:07:42 AM     Post Reply
Imagine the pitch to a History Channel executive for the smash hit The Bible. Here’s one scenario: Producers Roma Downey and Mark Burnett: “Hi, we want to produce a story that appeals to all age groups. It’s has everything: love, lust, greed, war, self-sacrifice and redemption. It’s called ‘The Bible.’” Executive: “Could you repeat that? You said ‘The Bible’?” RD and MB: “Yes – we want to retell the Bible for this generation. And we think we can make money doing it. We’ve done a lot of market research —there is no competition out there.”

Rolling Out
Weekly Standard, by Geoffrey Norman    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:04:35 AM     Post Reply
Since the Shermans of General Patton´s Third Army crossed the Rhine on March 22, 1945, there have been American tanks in Germany. No more, as John Vandiver of Stars and Stripes reports. The U.S. Army’s 69-year history of basing main battle tanks on German soil quietly ended last month when 22 Abrams tanks, a main feature of armored combat units throughout the Cold War, embarked for the U.S. The departure of the last M-1 Abrams tanks coincides with the inactivation of two of the Army’s Germany-based heavy brigades.

Mother Of Slain Benghazi
Officer To Sean Hannity:
‘They Want Me To Shut Up’
Mediaite, by A.J. Delgado    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:00:16 AM     Post Reply
On Friday, Sean Hannity brought Pat Smith, mother of the late Sean Smith, on his radio program. The 34-year-old information management officer was one of four Americans murdered in the Benghazi embassy attack on September 11, 2012. In the chilling interview, a distraught Ms. Smith, in tears, pleaded for answers and spoke of the efforts to silence her. Ms. Smith first relayed how her son, prior to the attack, requested additional security in advance and warned the State Department: He did tell them, ahead of time, he typed it into his little typewriter over there,

Councilman busted in bribery
probe was flogged by
leaders of his heathen religion
New York Post, by Bill Nestel    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 4:55:27 AM     Post Reply
The city councilman who bungled his way into federal bribery charges is also a total bonehead in his kooky heathen religion — whose members wear medieval garb, make sacrifices to multiple gods and compete in combat games. Dan Halloran (R-Queens) — who was arrested Tuesday as the suspected bag man in state Sen. Malcolm Smith’s alleged plot to buy his way onto the mayoral ticket — has been publicly flogged and lost a spear-throwing contest as part of his Theodish punishments. Halloran converted in the 1980s from Catholicism to the pre-Christian Germanic religion, whose believers drink mead

Why Is California Hosed?
Blame ‘The Bloomberg Syndrome’
PJ Media, by Ed Driscoll    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 4:43:34 AM     Post Reply
“Nice puff piece on San Francisco’s Trash Inspectors” in the Atlantic, one of Ace’s co-bloggers quips. “I can’t quite put my thumb on why California has a debt issue. It couldn’t be paying people to do stuff like this can it?” The piece highlights — I take it back, praises — nanny-state intrusiveness to the nth-degree: To help improve the city’s landfill diversion rate, Slattery and his crew pound the pavement, both in the early morning and in the evening, keeping tabs on what’s being thrown out and educating people about the three-bin system.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



We Are Living in
a Dying Country

92 replie(s)
Rushlimbaugh.com, by Rush Limbaugh    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/5/2013 4:53:10 PM     Post Reply
RUSH: Folks, I don´t know how else to categorize this. We are living in a dying country. I don´t know how else to categorize what´s happening -- 88,000 new jobs. The unemployment rate, because of a terrible statistic, is down to 7.6%. The number of people in this country who are not working is shameful. Ninety million Americans are no longer in the workforce. Ninety million. People not in the labor force grew by 663,000, and now 90 million. That´s the labor force participation rate. This is 1979 levels.

Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney
General´ Comment Was a Gaffe

62 replie(s)
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM     Post Reply
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that

Hillary Clinton Would Not
´Clear the Field´ for 2016

41 replie(s)
New Republic, by Tod Lindberg    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/6/2013 5:22:36 AM     Post Reply
No one is more preoccupied these days with Hillary Clinton´s 2016 plans than the Beltway political class—not even the former presidential candidate herself. To hear some tell it, her decision will be dispositive for all other Democrats thinking of entering the race. And pundits and reporters aren´t the only ones positing the "The Hillary Factor": No less than the House Democratic whip, Steny Hoyer, told BuzzFeed, “I don´t know that anybody would run against Hillary…. If she runs, she clears the field.” It´s an understandable conclusion, given Clinton´s stature in the Democratic Party and her 70 percent

Obama critic apologizes for
his ´poorly chosen words´
on gay marriage

41 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington DC], by Alexandra Jaffe    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/6/2013 12:18:19 PM     Post Reply
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson, considered by some to be a potential Republican contender for president, apologized to Johns Hopkins University for the "poorly chosen words" he used in expressing his opposition to gay marriage last month.“I am sorry for any embarrassment this has caused,” Carson said in the letter, reported in New York Magazine.(Snip) "Although I do believe marriage is between a man and a woman, there are much less offensive ways to make that point. I hope all will look at a lifetime of service over some poorly chosen words.” Carson will remain as commencement speaker at Johns Hopkins,

´My bangs are getting
a little irritating´: Michelle
Obama admits she already regrets
her high-maintenance hairdo

40 replie(s)
Daily Mail (UK), by Margot Peppers    Original Article
Posted By: pineledger- 4/7/2013 7:43:42 AM     Post Reply
Michelle Obama has admitted that she is already tired of the bangs she first sported in January. The First Lady said in an interview with Entertainment Tonight: ´Bangs are a day-by-day proposition. They´re starting to grow out, get a little irritating.´ Still, she hasn´t let her hairdo woes get her down. ´It´s okay,´ she said after her initial complaint. ´We´ll be good.´ The first indication that her hairstyle was becoming a burden came about last weekend, when Malia, 14, was spotted adjusting her mother´s hair during the White House Easter Egg Roll.

Hillary Clinton: The clock is turning
back for women in America

38 replie(s)
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/5/2013 3:25:20 PM     Post Reply
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton explained to the Women in the World summit in New York today that the clock is turning back for women in America. Clinton praised her own mother for helping empower her to success and marveled at the opportunities that her own daughter Chelsea has pursued. But Clinton warned that there is still so much to do to promote women´s rights in America. "As I look at all these young women that I am privileged to work with, or know through Chelsea, and its hard to imagine turning the clock on them," Clinton said.

White House Blames Jobs
Numbers on Sequester

36 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Wynton Hall    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/5/2013 8:02:58 PM     Post Reply
The Obama White House is scrambling to blame Friday’s abysmal March jobs numbers on the sequester’s trimming of the rate of growth in federal budgets that have yet to fully commence. After the Labor Department announced that a mass exodus of 663,000 workers left the U.S. workforce last month and that job creation fell 112,000 jobs short of projections, Obama’s top economic adviser Alan B. Krueger, took to the White House blog to blame the sequester: It is important to bear in mind that the March household and payroll surveys are the first monthly surveys to look

We are living in a dying country (Thread 2)
36 replie(s)
Rushlimbaugh.com, by Rush Limbaugh    Original Article
Posted By: LComStaff- 4/7/2013 6:49:54 AM     Post Reply
This is the second thread of an article posted yesterday which can be found here:http://lucianne.com/thread/?artnum=730032

The Deafening Silence that
Signals Our Demise

35 replie(s)
Townhall, by Diana West    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/5/2013 11:56:32 AM     Post Reply
Get ready for the last straw. First, though, I´d like to suggest that anyone reading this column in a local newspaper or news site pat the editor on the back for publishing what in our neo-medieval world of fear amounts to a forbidden column. Yup, I am about to say something about the Great Barack Obama Identity/Eligibility Scandal again. I know that this is one rich and urgent topic that doesn´t see the light of day in certain so-called news outlets -- and I say that from the experience of watching my own syndicated columns

Trayvon Martin´s parents
settle wrongful death claim

32 replie(s)
Orlando Sentinel, by Rene Stutzman    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/5/2013 3:15:25 PM     Post Reply
SANFORD - Trayvon Martin´s parents have settled a wrongful death claim for an amount believed to be more than $1 million against the homeowners association of the Sanford subdivision where their teenage son was killed. Their attorney, Benjamin Crump, filed that paperwork at the Seminole County Courthouse, a portion of which was made public today. In the five pages of the settlement that were available for public review, the settlement amount had been marked out. Lower in the agreement, the parties specified that they would keep that amount confidential. When asked during an earlier interview whether the amount was

Beyonce, Jay-Z celebrate 5th
anniversary in Havana, Cuba

32 replie(s)
Los Angeles Times, by Nardine Saad    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 4/6/2013 8:20:04 AM     Post Reply
Beyonce and Jay-Z celebrated their fifth wedding anniversary in Cuba this week. The couple, who married on April 4, 2008, took in the sights of Old Havana, visited a school, dined on a rooftop terrace and strolled the fan-filled streets in their island best.(snip).The power couple declined to answer journalists´ questions about their visit to the island nation, but some outlets are reporting that the moguls are there as tourists, though that would be illegal because of the half-century embargo the U.S. has on the Communist country. However, the Miami Herald said Washington has issued special licenses for

Obama Budget to Cap Retirement
Accounts at $3 Million

30 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Tony Lee    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/5/2013 9:40:39 PM     Post Reply
The budget President Barack Obama will submit on April 10 will contain a proposal that would prohibit individuals from accumulating more than $3 million in Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) and tax-preferred retirement accounts. According to a White House statement, the Obama administration believes the current rules allow some wealthy individuals "to accumulate many millions of dollars in these accounts, substantially more than is needed to fund reasonable levels of retirement saving." "The budget would limit an individual’s total balance across tax-preferred accounts to an amount sufficient to finance an annuity of not more than $205,000 per


Post Reply   Close thread 705296





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS