A Message From Lucianne  


S-CR-TEO

S-ADI-01






ST-GC


        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


B-CR-TEO
  Topic: Maybe Trump knows his
base better than we do
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Maybe Trump knows his
base better than we do

Washington Post, by Fareed Zakaria

Original Article

Posted By:PageTurner, 12/1/2017 11:38:03 AM

Watching the Republican tax plan race through Congress, one is reminded of a big apparent difference between President Trump’s program and other populist movements in the Western world. In the United States, Trump is leading something that is best described as plutocratic populism, a mixture of traditional populist causes with extreme libertarian ones. Congress’s own think tanks — the Joint Committee on Taxation and the Congressional Budget Office — calculate that in 10 years, people making between $50,000 and $75,000 (around the median income in the United States) would effectively pay a whopping $4 billion more in taxes, while people making

Comments:
Fareed is perplexed.

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: nimby, 12/1/2017 11:59:28 AM     (No. 11467571)

Not a "Maybe" you political hack!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    44 persons like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Ben Around, 12/1/2017 12:02:30 PM     (No. 11467575)


I agree with #1. It is obvious the dems and establishment do not understand Trump or his supporters. That is good news, right now it looks like a lot of the establishment are once again going to be shocked and deranged by the results of the coming elections.

Deja Vous all over again!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    48 persons like this.


   

 

    
R-LU-C1-New-Sek
R-LU-C1-New-Sek
  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: PIAPilot, 12/1/2017 12:18:41 PM     (No. 11467599)

As usual he looks at one set of numbers and draws a massive conclusion without explaining the underlying info. I would be lumped into his median income group saying I would pay more. In my personal circumstances I will be better off with an increased standard deduction rather than a litany of deductions. Where are these median income people who will be paying more taxes? This comes to $400Million per year over the 10 years. How many taxpayers are impacted? 1 million? 10 million? Are those in blue states (NY, NJ, CA, etc) more unevenly impacted due to high taxes? Will those in lower tax states better off? The article is woefully short on information.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    13 persons like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: cThree, 12/1/2017 12:26:10 PM     (No. 11467609)

I used to read Zakaria fairly often, but y´know, when you go to bed with the WaPost, you´re going to wake up with rather a journalistic chlamydia.

I can see it in the first paragraph excerpted here. I´ll save my "click" for a healthier source.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    17 persons like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: bohallx, 12/1/2017 12:58:58 PM     (No. 11467648)

As I recall it, way back in 1998 or thereabouts I first proposed reforming the federal income tax system such that the Democrats had their taxes increased, and the Republicans had their taxes decreased.

I think we have success in this package.

All should be happy.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    26 persons like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: cheeflo, 12/1/2017 1:32:28 PM     (No. 11467697)

Ya think?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    12 persons like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: beancounter, 12/1/2017 1:55:00 PM     (No. 11467720)

Maybe Trump´s people can read a CBO report better than Fareed Zakaria. If you look at page 10 of the linked document, you can see that the numbers he is referring to are only for the year 2027. For the year 2021 the numbers are $19.47 billion savings for the middle class segment and $28.69 billion savings for the top income segment.

Of course, the fact that they do these projections out 10 years based on tax increases 8+ years in the future, that we all know will not happen, is a joke. You only have to look at the projections for ObamaCare to see that.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    15 persons like this.


   

 

R-TA-Wide_2
  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: TexasHillCountry, 12/1/2017 2:43:29 PM     (No. 11467779)

Fareed, bless you muslim heart, it is not only his base that POTUS Trump knows better than you do. I´d start a list, but even a short one would exceed the word limit.

Just sit down, shut up, pay attention, and watch what happens, FZ.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    15 persons like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: jeffkinnh, 12/1/2017 4:59:46 PM     (No. 11467913)

What Trump´s base know is that projections that the media likes to quote are useless. They are wrong, incomplete, biased, and messed up.

An example. One of these projections say medical costs will rise for lower income people because they, freed from the BOCare mandate, will CHOOSE not to buy health care, and somehow that will increase their costs.

There is no way to really know what will happen or the financial impact. It´s all guesswork, just like the original BOCare "projections were, and were TOTALLY wrong.

The tax bill tries to get government off the backs of the people and free the economy from absurd levels of tax. It´s the right thing to do and is likely to be effective. How much exactly is anyone´s guess.

So spin your numbers Fareed. They are worthless as is your "reporting".

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    12 persons like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: MOAB, 12/1/2017 5:37:04 PM     (No. 11467942)

Got that that right Charlie. He is smarter than the press with 2/3 his brain tied behind his back.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    10 persons like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: dvc, 12/1/2017 5:48:09 PM     (No. 11467953)

Perhaps THE single stupidest headline I have ever seen.

MAYBE??

Idiots.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    11 persons like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 929403




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "PageTurner"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "PageTurner"



Obama tries to claim credit for
Trump economic boom, finally
gets smacked down
American Thinker, by Monica Showalter    Original Article
Posted By: PageTurner- 12/11/2017 11:28:35 AM     Post Reply
One of the more obvious things about the Trump economy is how much better it is than the Obama economy. Yet incredibly, President Obama, as if jealously looking on at this night-and-day difference, is trying to claim credit for it. From the Washington Times: Former President Barack Obama is taking credit for the robust economic growth that is taking place under President Trump. At a conference of mayors in Chicago, Mr. Obama congratulated himself Tuesday for strong employment numbers in the U.S. this year, saying his climate-change policies have contributed to growth.

Jerry Brown blames everyone
but himself for California wildfires
American Thinker, by Monica Showalter    Original Article
Posted By: PageTurner- 12/10/2017 4:06:21 PM     Post Reply
Jerry Brown is at it again. Blaming Californians for the devastating series of California wildfires month, he went Full Moonbeam and declared the problem a function of global warming, calling it a new normal about which nothing is to be done. As if wildfires that sweep away homes in California´s unique Mediteranean microclimates have never happened before this past week. Compare and contrast to President Trump´s gracious tweet on the matter, which was the classy thing to say: Our thoughts and prayers are with everyone in the path of California’s wildfires. I encourage everyone to heed the advice and orders of local and state

Power hungry Anna Wintour
is ‘scaring’ Conde staffers in meetings
New York Post, by Merle Ginsburg    Original Article
Posted By: PageTurner- 12/10/2017 1:52:10 PM     Post Reply
Since its inception in 1994, the Vanity Fair Oscar party, long hosted by Editor-in-Chief Graydon Carter, has become the must-attend bash for Hollywood A-listers. Everyone who’s anyone poses on the red carpet: The night’s big winners inevitably stop by before or after hitting their own studio-hosted affairs; and stars not attending the awards ceremony show up here to watch it on big-screen televisions. The only other annual party that’s as star-studded is the Met Gala in Manhattan. In 2018, those two events could look more similar than ever, as tongues are wagging that Anna Wintour — editor-in-chief of Vogue, editorial

New evacuations as huge
Southern California fire flares up
Associated Press, by Christopher Weber    Original Article
Posted By: PageTurner- 12/10/2017 1:25:50 PM     Post Reply
LOS ANGELES – A flare-up on the western edge of Southern California´s largest and most destructive wildfire sent residents fleeing Sunday, as wind-fanned flames churned through canyons and down hillsides toward coastal towns. Crews with help from water-dropping aircraft saved several homes as unpredictable gusts sent the blaze churning deeper into foothill areas northwest of Los Angeles that haven´t burned in decades. New evacuations were ordered in Carpinteria, a seaside city in Santa Barbara County that has been under fire threat for days. "The winds are kind of squirrely right now," said county fire spokesman Mike Eliason. "Some places the smoke is

Lessons learned? Lilac Fire tested
strategies drawn from ´07 and ´03 fires
San Diego Union-Tribune, by Peter Rowe    Original Article
Posted By: PageTurner- 12/10/2017 1:18:41 PM     Post Reply
After more than a decade of studying wildfires, San Diego County took its final exams last week. Did we pass? Authorities say the region is far better equipped to handle swift, wind-whipped flames than it was during the firestorms of 2007 and ’03. “We’re about $460 million more prepared,” Supervisor Dianne Jacob said Friday, “both on the ground and in the air.” Officials cited better communication between fire agencies; more fire engines and air tankers on the front lines, day and night; and better tracking of the flames. Despite these advances, the Lilac Fire’s first 24 hours consumed 4,100 acres

   

 

R-LJ
  


 
Amnesty International caught taking
Soros cash to push abortion in Ireland
American Thinker, by Monica Showalter    Original Article
Posted By: PageTurner- 12/10/2017 7:34:29 AM     Post Reply
Amnesty International, the sanctimonious purported human rights group that champions halting the death penalty, has been caught taking $160,000 from George Soros´s Open Society Foundation to promote...abortion, in contravention of Irish law. File under "unclear on the concept" in championing the value of human life. It´s hard to say which player in this drama here is most loathsome. Soros is appalling just for his uni-world vision with rotted out values, from pot legalization to releasing predators out on the streets from prisons to coercive, anything-goes redefinitions of family. He calls himself a "stateless statesman" and sees that as his license

"The new normal": Governor Jerry
Brown surveys damage of Thomas Fire
Associated Press, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: PageTurner- 12/9/2017 9:11:09 PM     Post Reply
Update (1:30 p.m.) - California Governor Jerry Brown says deadly and destructive wildfires in winter are "the new normal." Brown on Saturday toured Ventura County neighborhoods ravaged by a weeklong wildfire that killed at least one person and destroyed hundreds of homes and other buildings. At a news conference, Brown said drought and climate change mean California faces a "new reality" where lives and property are continually threatened by fire, at a cost of billions of dollars. He added that gusty winds and low humidity are continuing and warned that there´s a good chance of seeing "firefighting at Christmas." He also said: "With climate



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



5 Things to Know About Doug Jones´ Victory
Over Roy Moore in the Alabama Senate Race

51 replie(s)
PJ Media, by Tyler O´Neil    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 12/13/2017 4:25:54 AM     Post Reply
On Tuesday, Democrat Doug Jones pulled off a stunning victory over Republican Roy Moore in Alabama. The race went down to the wire, but the Democrat prevailed. Here are five things to know about why Jones won, why Moore lost, and what it means for the future of the U.S. Senate and both parties. 1. Character matters. According to NBC News exit polls, 49 percent of Alabama voters thought the sexual assault accusations against Roy Moore were "definitely" or "probably" true. Republicans and Democrats split on partisan lines — a whopping 82 percent of Republicans said the allegations were "probably" or "definitely" false,

Alabama Senate election: Doug Jones
defeats Roy Moore, Fox News projects

46 replie(s)
Fox News, by Alex Pappas    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 12/12/2017 10:32:26 PM     Post Reply
DEVELOPING…Democrat Doug Jones has defeated Roy Moore in Alabama’s Senate election, according to a projection from the Fox News Decision Desk.ORIGINAL STORY…The hard-fought Alabama Senate race between Republican Roy Moore and Democrat Doug Jones remains too close to call, though a Fox News voter analysis shows the Democratic nominee enjoying a lead over his GOP rival. Jones’ competitiveness is a remarkable development in a deep red state that reflects just how badly Moore has been hurt by a sex scandal. But the race is still fluid. With 87 percent of precincts reporting, Jones and Moore both had 49.2 percent, according to

Brzezinski: Trump ‘Literally
Sexually Harassed’ Gillibrand

45 replie(s)
Breitbart Video, by Ian Hanchett    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 12/12/2017 4:40:27 PM     Post Reply
On Tuesday’s broadcast of MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” co-host Mika Brzezinski argued President Trump’s tweet about Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) constitutes sexual harassment and that people who work around the president and don’t try to get him to delete the tweet don’t care about the country or women. Brzezinski said, “I just want to say something, beyond the fact that it is reprehensible that the president of the United States would say something so derogatory and disgusting about a woman, we’re not surprised, Mr. President. You do it all the time. You treat women terribly, and you treat the women around

   

 



 
Al Franken Still Hasn’t Said
When He’s Actually Resigning

37 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Peter Hasson    Original Article
Posted By: NorthernDog- 12/12/2017 1:24:41 PM     Post Reply
Franken announced last Thursday that he would be resigning “in the coming weeks” after eight different women accused him of groping or forcibly kissing them. “The timing of Franken’s resignation remains unclear, as is his motive in delaying it,” New York Magazine’s Ed Kilgore noted at the time. Franken has yet to offer any more specificity about when he’s going to follow through in resigning. Franken’s office did not return multiple requests for comment on the subject. Franken begrudgingly offered his resignation after 35 Democratic senators called on him to do so, three weeks after he was first accused

Trump attacks Gillibrand in tweet
critics say is sexually suggestive
and demeaning

34 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Ashley Parker    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 12/12/2017 12:07:28 PM     Post Reply
President Trump attacked Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) in a sexually suggestive tweet Tuesday morning that implied Gillibrand would do just about anything for money, prompting a swift and immediate backlash. “Lightweight Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, a total flunky for Charles E. Schumer and someone who would come to my office ´begging´ for campaign contributions not so long ago (and would do anything for them), is now in the ring fighting against Trump,” the president wrote. “Very disloyal to Bill & Crooked-USED!”

The actress to marry Prince Harry
is not a commoner, and neither
are you, my fellow American

33 replie(s)
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, by David Shribman    Original Article
Posted By: Tianne- 12/12/2017 12:38:57 PM     Post Reply
Margaret Thatcher was born one. So were predecessor Prime Ministers Benjamin Disraeli and William E. Gladstone. Diana, the princess of Wales, too. Also William Pitt, who presided over the British victory in the French and Indian War and lent his name to Pittsburgh. And, according to some university authorities four decades ago, me as well. We were all born commoners. But — despite what newspapers, websites and television stations on both sides of the Atlantic have reported with wonder and wild-eyed delight — Meghan Markle, the actor who is to marry Prince Harry, is not a commoner. She’s an American, and

Sen. Elizabeth Warren Faces Criticism
over ‘Slut-Shaming’ Tweet

30 replie(s)
Breitbart.com, by Charlie Nash    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 12/12/2017 3:55:27 PM     Post Reply
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) faced criticism for saying that President Donald Trump “slut-shamed” Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) with a non-sexual insult, Tuesday. After President Donald Trump made a post on Twitter claiming that Sen. Gillibrand “would do anything” for campaign contributions, Sen. Warren made her own post accusing Trump of “slut-shaming.” “Are you really trying to bully, intimidate and slut-shame @SenGillibrand?” asked Sen. Warren in her post. “Do you know who you’re picking a fight with? Good luck with that, @realDonaldTrump. Nevertheless, #shepersisted.” Are you really trying to bully, intimidate and slut-shame @SenGillibrand? Do you know who you´re picking a fight with? Good

   

Post Reply   Close thread 929403



Sek-Float


Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


© 2015 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~