A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC



        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


  Topic: Tear down this icon: Why the GOP
has to get over Ronald Reagan
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Tear down this icon: Why the GOP
has to get over Ronald Reagan

Washington Post, by Jennifer Rubin

Original Article

Posted By:Desert Fox, 4/27/2013 6:32:46 AM

The unfailing reverence on the American right for Ronald Reagan is understandable. He was the only exemplar of modern conservatism to win the White House, and unlike liberal icons such as Roosevelt or Johnson or Obama, he presided over an economic boom and became beloved by voters not normally drawn to his party. No wonder that Reagan, long before his death in 2004, attained mythical status in the conservative movement and the Republican Party. But that myth has become a burden for the modern GOP. It has bound Reagan’s followers on the right to policies and positions that were

Comments:
She sounds like she actually posts here on Lucianne.com using numerous pseudonymns. Why am I not surprised by this? Rubin was totally and embarrassingly head-over-heels over Mitt Romney. Praised him to the skies, and dumped on anyone opposing him. Loathed Palin. Seemed entirely dismissive (if not actually antagonistic) towards the grassroots/tea-party. Her GOP-E ilk always hated Reagan. She needs to be reminded that Ronald Reagan was not a Myth. He actually accomplished Historic Achievements. He also said what he meant and meant what he said.


      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: dudette4freedom, 4/27/2013 6:42:03 AM     (No. 9299021)

She is flat wrong here. Once in awhile she writes something intelligent. This is not it.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 2 - Posted by: Judith, 4/27/2013 6:43:33 AM     (No. 9299023)

The GOP has to finally own up to the fact that it is now a democrat entity. The rest of the country has to find a new political party that behaves like a responsible adult. And Rubin has to realize that she, too, is actually a democrat, she never transformed.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Grace Veritas, 4/27/2013 7:02:26 AM     (No. 9299037)

Omigosh, what is it with the suicidal tendencies of the Republican Party? Can you imagine the Dems ever talking about the need to dial it back on the deification of FDR, JFK, heck, for that matter Mikhail Gorbachev? A more self-loathing party than the Republicans (as governed by its elites) cannot be imagined.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 4 - Posted by: plumnellie, 4/27/2013 7:05:07 AM     (No. 9299040)

Thanks OP. I have long felt Lcom had serial posters and Rubin would probably be the type to be one. I guess she has forgotten that Mitt lost, Dole lost, McCain lost but Reagan won twice. She wants the conservatives to stop trying to follow their beliefs and just rubber stamp the liberal Repubs.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 5 - Posted by: Periwinkel, 4/27/2013 7:06:02 AM     (No. 9299041)

Jennifer is a denizen of DC and, as such, she hates the conservatives across the country. Sometimes I wonder if she has ever ventured outside her Washington-Maryland-Northern Virginia confines. She probably has visited the Grand Canyon and believes that gives her credibility to expound on various GOP topics vs conservatives´ views.

I will say her tv makeup has improved over the last year or two.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 6 - Posted by: nonsense, 4/27/2013 7:13:37 AM     (No. 9299046)

Must agree with other L-dotters, she is a Bloomin´ Boomtowner, filled with cocktail party chatter and advice for the "little people".

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 7 - Posted by: RoseOfTexas, 4/27/2013 7:20:47 AM     (No. 9299059)

When I think of people the GOP has to get over, the first one that comes to mind is Marco Rubio.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: globalwarmer, 4/27/2013 7:26:22 AM     (No. 9299067)

Rush should have fun with this one today.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 9 - Posted by: globalwarmer, 4/27/2013 7:26:56 AM     (No. 9299069)

Whoops, I mean Monday.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 10 - Posted by: Freeloader, 4/27/2013 7:51:01 AM     (No. 9299098)

Forget Sir Ronaldus Magnus, our leader who carried 49 States in 1984 and secured for the GOP the greatest Electoral College victory in the history of The Republic?...Wonder how much The Washington Post pays this young political ignoramus?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 11 - Posted by: kahunavol, 4/27/2013 8:06:59 AM     (No. 9299125)

Jennifer and her cohorts here are like liberal Episcopalians. They have won and now control the denomination/party but found that those whom they have conquered are not obliged to continue the association. Now what you do with what you won is up to you entirely. Have fun with that because it doesn´t seem to be working out very well for you.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 12 - Posted by: PoliticalJunky, 4/27/2013 8:10:21 AM     (No. 9299128)

Four pages! Wow. Well, she certainly tried hard.

I revere Ronald Reagan. I have sometimes thought, however, that any subsequent candidate is in the position of a second wife who can never measure up to her husband´s memory of his sainted first wife.

This longing for another Reagan has been a stumbling block for a great many Republicans and as we read constantly on this site, they will settle for no less and will stay home before they accept less. Even worse, they will attack and denigrate any proposed successor thereby helping the Democrats while claiming they are standing up for principle. I don´t think there is any cure for what ails them.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: LouD, 4/27/2013 8:26:22 AM     (No. 9299148)

I couldn´t even get past the Johnson and Obama were icons. Barf!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 14 - Posted by: Guard SGT (ret), 4/27/2013 8:31:30 AM     (No. 9299150)

First the Corrupt Party has to admit that Barry Soetoro is an unconstitutional Usurper and not the 44th President. When they admit he and their party are a total fraud, I might listen.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 15 - Posted by: sunsong, 4/27/2013 8:36:39 AM     (No. 9299160)

She is totally right. Excellent article!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 16 - Posted by: BuckeyeRon, 4/27/2013 8:44:19 AM     (No. 9299166)

#5, Rubin is a Californian with undergrad and law school at Berkeley and a 20 year stint as a labor lawyer in Hollyweird and only recently moved to the DC area...what GOP campaigns, local or state organizations, or local/state/federal administrations has she actually been involved with? How did she become designated a conservative columnist? Rubin, her spin and the WaPo are bogus...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 17 - Posted by: zzzghy, 4/27/2013 8:52:27 AM     (No. 9299175)

I agree; Rubin uses four pages to argue a point that a skilled writer could manage in two, but I´m not willing to throw her overboard just for that.

FTA:

Today’s Republican Party, however, faces legions of voters and candidates who came of age politically after Reagan’s eight years in office. An entire generation recalls him vaguely as a genial, optimistic president who stood up for America in the Cold War.

The Republican Party can remain a Ronald Reagan historical society, or it can try to endure as a force in national politics. But it can’t do both. The choice matters greatly, for there is no guarantee that the GOP will retain its ability to win national elections or that conservatism has a future as a national governing philosophy.


She could´ve stopped there.

The GOP is constipated, big time. People in that condition are no fun to be around, and they can´t get anything done because they´re all plugged up and self-absorbed.

Conservative voters are pretty much on the outside looking in now; the democrats are off-the-hook crazy and the GOP isn´t very far behind. Rubin´s list of new ´pubbie "leaders" doesn´t exactly inspire -- McDonnell, Walker, Christie, Rubio Paul, Jindal, Martinez -- and it makes me wonder if the lofo phenom and a truly crappy roster of GOPers might be producing a perfect storm that could lay waste the Republican Party (on the national scene, at least) for a couple decades. That would probably be fatal for our Country, at least, as we know it.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: ramona, 4/27/2013 9:08:44 AM     (No. 9299198)

Yeah, well, I´ve just always wanted to go down a rabbit hole.....
Ramona (the Pest)

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 19 - Posted by: bella, 4/27/2013 9:39:30 AM     (No. 9299235)

Ms. Rubin is wrong, again.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 20 - Posted by: tisHimself, 4/27/2013 9:44:39 AM     (No. 9299240)

Jennifer Rubin, spokesperson for the establishment Flat Earth republicans. Enjoy the free shrimp and merlot, sleep in on Sunday and pretend that 2010 didn´t happen. And whatever you do, pay no attention to the tea party villagers with their pitchforks and their torches, they just don´t understand the brilliance of the enlightened republican royalists.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: Angry Dumbo, 4/27/2013 9:45:24 AM     (No. 9299241)

I agree with Rubin about the purity issue. There is only one Reagan and as a party we should be able to argue about policy, not simply imitate Reagan´s. So long as we focus on framing issues within the context of limited government under the enumerated powers, I´m good.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 22 - Posted by: jansgraphix, 4/27/2013 9:51:36 AM     (No. 9299250)

She was a democrat when the Reagan revolution happened and missed the whole thing. Now shes switched to republican. Obviously the transformation was incomplete which helps explain a lot. A more perfect rino could not be ´made´.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: yuban, 4/27/2013 9:52:53 AM     (No. 9299253)

It is easy to name the posters that could be Rubin. We already have another RR but the Moderates that run the GOP hate her and continually try to destroy her. The Moderates would rather keep losing the WH than to let a Conservative win.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 24 - Posted by: Grumpy Yee, 4/27/2013 9:59:09 AM     (No. 9299259)

I heard Mark Levin´s comments on her piece and he tore her a new one and I stopped reading this woman´s writings a long time ago because she always appeared to be brain dead whenever I read her column. Now this just proves she is totally clueless.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 25 - Posted by: jasmine, 4/27/2013 10:15:48 AM     (No. 9299290)

I have to agree that John McCain makes an ugly poster child for the GOP. But isn´t that the point? It´s not Reagan who is out of place. The biggest threat to the GOP comes from RINOs like McCain, who are stupidly pushing the legalization of millions of undocumented Democrats. How dumb do you have to be to miss that?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 26 - Posted by: stablemoney, 4/27/2013 10:17:32 AM     (No. 9299293)

GTH.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 27 - Posted by: kanphil, 4/27/2013 10:19:14 AM     (No. 9299298)

Get over Reagan? That´s like saying we should get over the Constitution. Ain´t gonna happen.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 28 - Posted by: hoosiergirl71, 4/27/2013 10:31:02 AM     (No. 9299319)

We will if the Left gets over Bill C. At least our Icon is legit. Sorry Jen, you slipped off the rail on this one.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 29 - Posted by: Jakester2344, 4/27/2013 10:31:56 AM     (No. 9299321)

Well it surprised me to see a moderate Republican go after Reagan. I mean it is almost like they want to emulate and imitate the dims.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 30 - Posted by: 49 Ford, 4/27/2013 10:39:59 AM     (No. 9299325)

Rubin´s basic point is sound - the terrain has changed a great deal since the 1970´s and ´80´s. We have a different electorate which is larger, browner and weaned on video games, sloppy education, sexual license and the notion of government as the all-purpose Sugar Daddy.

Does a traditional conservative message resonate with such a people? No. But do Rubin´s mushy, imprecise prescriptions offer a workable alternative? I don´t think so.

A country in the grip of political correctness, myopia and determined ignorance of the social and economic consequences of its current course will not be turned around by politicians, however solid or well intentioned.

Sorry to be the skunk at the picnic, but I don´t see any way out. I´ll be the first to rejoice if I am eventually proven wrong.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 31 - Posted by: god of irony, 4/27/2013 10:57:56 AM     (No. 9299351)

The basic laws of how a society works has NOT changed. Humans are best served with a government, social and economical system that is the least intrusive as possible. The best government can hope to do is to slow things up a little. Reagan understood and so does all REAL conservatives.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 32 - Posted by: Dragonslayer2, 4/27/2013 11:13:30 AM     (No. 9299374)

Talk of finding or forming a " new party" is a tale told by an idiot.

No new party could becom competitive for decades. Don´´t sacrifice the possibility of actually winning a presidential election for foolish principle.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 33 - Posted by: Foggybottom, 4/27/2013 11:23:15 AM     (No. 9299390)

The Republican party has left me. USIP anyone?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 34 - Posted by: SheikYerBooty, 4/27/2013 11:24:41 AM     (No. 9299394)

Reagan was a good man that genuinely cared about and loved America and believed in and projected the greatness of our wonderful country and it´s people.

He knew that liberalism is a destructive force and that government exasperates problems and that liberal policies result in untold pain, misery, death and degradation to our lives.

He believed in life including the life of the unborn, liberty (individual freedom) and the pursuit of happiness to live out your dreams.

In my opinion RINOs like their liberal brothers have no moral compass and a limited sense of right and wrong.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 35 - Posted by: Hermit_Crab, 4/27/2013 11:25:49 AM     (No. 9299396)

Yeah, Republicans better "get over" Reagan.

Face the facts. The GOP-E is never going to allow a conservative, well spoken honest and honorable person, who loves all the things that once made America great, to win a nomination again.

The GOP-E would rather reign in hell than serve in heaven. Heck, they would rather serve the left in hell, as long as they got a nice slice of the pie and the illusion that they are important.

The USA will never have an inspirational leader again. Only rulers and pseudo-populist figureheads.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 36 - Posted by: earlybird, 4/27/2013 11:35:04 AM     (No. 9299410)

That headline is a bit harsh.

Ronald Reagan wanted to win and knew that far right would not do it. (Remember, he had been on the other side for many years and had also been president of a union.) This is hard for many here to swallow, but it was his rationale when he made that "big tent" remark.

He was also a pragmatist, willing to compromise to at least get most of what he wanted.

I don´t believe he would be "electable" by today´s Republicans. The conservatives of today could not go along with his pragmatism.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 37 - Posted by: tomishere, 4/27/2013 11:56:40 AM     (No. 9299437)

Reagen would be hated by many posters here, for compromising with democrats. Reagens tax plan was suppose to be like the reductions in england, reductions of 10/10/10 for the first three years, his was 5/10/10. Bill Buckley asked him why he compromised with the democrats and he replied the "art of the possible". Could you imagine the snark and insults thrown at him with today´s conservatives. He raised taxes in 83, could you imagine our posters if he did that now, also thhe also didn´t cut social spending as much as he could have, he knew there was no political will for that. We now have very rigid demands that Reagen himself couldn´t live up to.

Although some parts of the article have fuzzy logic, the idea we need to make the conservative position relevant to today´s society makes sense, the rise of the one issue voter is really killing us, many poster here would never have voted for Reagen if they disagreed with him on any issue. The part of not connecting emotionally is a big problem for us, Reagen was a master at that. I think all she is trying to say is we need to be better at choosing our battles.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 38 - Posted by: sunsong, 4/27/2013 12:16:21 PM     (No. 9299453)

Republicans need to come into the 21st century and learn where they are in time. The GOP ought to be about empowering the individual (the BIll of Rights) and empowering the middle class.

Instead, right now, they are about hating - hating gays, hating immigrants, hating women, hating liberals, hating moderates, essentially hating anyone ANYONE who does not agree with them. They are so distant from Christ´s Love it is embarassing.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 39 - Posted by: Penney, 4/27/2013 12:20:39 PM     (No. 9299459)

Aside from restoring integrity, prosperity and strength to the USA following the disastrous malaise of Carter´s tenure and his Iran debacle, and all-the-while setting the captives of Communism free around the planet, who can possible attempt to marginalize the value & vision of President Reagan´s leadership when they can read his own words which are now published and available to all who cherish Life, Liberty and Justice for all?! Both his radio broadcasts before becoming President which he composed himself and are now available in published written form, and his journals which he wrote IN HIS OWN WORDS best relate RR´s authentic wisdom and where it came from.

Pres. Reagan´s example of leadership by example will probably never be surpassed as he remains one of American history´s greatest men to have ever occupied the WH, ...but voters must never give up that daunting quest! Why settle for the opposite?! America deserves the very best of our leaders and Pres. Reagan´s integrity, policy accomplishments & good cheer represent the best example of leadership which America has produced and has to offer the future.

Note: Despite the constant taunting by the lefty/lib/dem media, Pres. Reagan knew & displayed exactly how to handle the always negative press critters!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 40 - Posted by: hot coffee, 4/27/2013 12:25:55 PM     (No. 9299464)

Reagan is easily the best president of my lifetime.

If he were around today, the usual suspects would call him a RINO.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 41 - Posted by: msjena, 4/27/2013 12:30:48 PM     (No. 9299468)

The issue is not Ronald Reagan versus 2013. The issue is conservative ideas and philosophy. If they are right, they don´t change. Lower taxes, smaller government, individual liberty. That those happened to be Reagan´s ideas don´t make them any less relevant today.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 42 - Posted by: Susannah, 4/27/2013 12:55:05 PM     (No. 9299488)

Well, Posters 12, 13, 16, 31, 33, 37, 38, 39, and 41 have clearly revealed themselves to be Jennifer Rubin in disguise, with more to come, no doubt. Where does she find the time?

Ronald Reagan was the greatest president of my lifetime. But to quote the late John Gary: "Once upon a time never comes again."

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 43 - Posted by: TXknitter, 4/27/2013 12:56:53 PM     (No. 9299491)

If Reagan were around today, he would be vilified exactly like Sarah Palin. The elites (Bush crowd) despised him behind the scenes. It keeps one´s thinking straight to always remember that fact.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 44 - Posted by: BuckeyeRon, 4/27/2013 1:10:41 PM     (No. 9299506)

#44 and others, if RR was around today he would get the nomination. Let´s not forget he was dismissed as a light weight in his runs for and service as governor of CA and president. Go back and read #40...RR was of very high intellect and wrote extensively for years, and when you couple that with a love of country, core principles, and a unique magnetism whether you dealt with him one on one or in a large audience or via the TV, you have a winner. GOP winners since Ike have all been from big states, and two were governors with executive experience in large states. He also was a politician who assembled a crack team of no-nonsense players for his campaigns and for governing (including a cadre of Bushies and folks we now call RINOs). I´m looking at a Scott Walker or more polished Rick Perry for 2016.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 45 - Posted by: absalom, 4/27/2013 1:40:30 PM     (No. 9299530)

The GOP has never been a conservative party. NEVER! It´s energizing theme was preserving the Union, a noble cause it consummated in much blood. Post Civil War, its theme shifted to secular progressivism which encouraged the expansion of industrial capitalism; creating great wealth and resulted in the R´s being labeled the party of big business which has little, if anything, in common w/principled conservatism. So is it any wonder the GOP nominated but two conservatives in the last 100 years? Rubin, an R lefty, speaks for the Est. gang that presented the voters w/the likes of Hover, Landon, Wilkie, Dewey, the Bushes, Romney etc; her core argument being that conservatism is a loser and to win the GOP need more of the same old. Really? Sadly a number of posters believe that garbage. Despite all the happy talk, the R´s have been in decline since FDR; the D´s effective control of Congress being testament to that reality. Conservatives understand full well the electoral dynamic in play; the sad sack GOP does not.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 46 - Posted by: VAfreedomluver, 4/27/2013 1:46:25 PM     (No. 9299532)

It´s one thing to argue over policies and change them if they need changing.

But I will never abandon my principles for the sake of political expediency. And make no mistake about it, the argument within the GOP right now is all about principles. Jennifer Rubin and her ilk are apparently happy to be cast as "slightly more parsimonious liberals." If the GOP goes that way, I will happily vote Libertarian.

There is nothing magical about the GOP, and if it abandons me and my principles, I will look elsewhere.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 47 - Posted by: 49 Ford, 4/27/2013 1:49:43 PM     (No. 9299533)

Well #43, I for one (#31) am not Jennifer Rubin. I wouldn´t even know what a morning make-up routine is all about. But if you have some idea of how to sell conservative ideas to an increasingly ignorant and slovenly electorate, by all means have at it. I´ll contribute to your PAC or vote for you.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 48 - Posted by: mseegal, 4/27/2013 1:51:37 PM     (No. 9299536)

When I saw the article´s headline, my head nearly exploded. I admit to being a rabid fan of RR. After I actually read the article, though, I found myself agreeing with some of her points, but not all. My favorite line was "Policy without a politician is a dissertation." Hello, Bob Dole, John McCain and Mitt Romney!!

I´m so upset with all the problems #31 related, that I´m inclined to retire my 2009 Tea Party posters, hang up my marching shoes, focus on my family, my neighbors and God´s Holy Word. Then comes the Ted Cruz candidacy, which the Texas GOP establishment (that´s you Rick Perry and all the Bushes) tried to kill in its cradle. Dewhurst had all the money and organization, but we had THE candidate and grass-roots passion. The rest of America is discovering Ted Cruz and you can thank non-establishment conservative Texans for that! You´re welcome.

So my prescription is tell the RNC to go to heck, work like crazy in the primaries for conservatives and don´t let the federal mess in Washington steal your joy. Someday we will have our national candidate, rather than a dissertation, and conservativism will be restored.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 49 - Posted by: beth, 4/27/2013 2:11:56 PM     (No. 9299551)

No one should set aside the issues they find most important to support a party. If there is no one on the ballot who represents my concerns than why vote? As someone who has voted Republican for over three decades, I´m finding it harder to want to even bother.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 50 - Posted by: tomishere, 4/27/2013 2:43:15 PM     (No. 9299571)

#43 I doubt you read the article, you are the type that would have turned against Reagen if he did one thing you didn´t agree with. The governors she used as examples have put conservative principals into action, but they have done it without hostility towards groups they disagree with. The article points out we have failed to explain how conservatism can make life better for the masses. One of the many brilliant attributes of Reagen was he had the ability to show how conservative principals could make peoples lies better. while Reagen was staunchly pro life, he was not hostile towards any group of people, like some conservatives are. I will remind everybody Reagen was the proponent of the big tent.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 51 - Posted by: redink, 4/27/2013 2:59:14 PM     (No. 9299585)

I suppose we should also get over George Washington, Ben Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Thomas Paine, Patrick Henry...oh, and while we´re getting over heroic Americans, why not include across the pond: Margaret Thatcher and Winston Churchill.

What is it with pundits? Courage is a thing to be emulated and admired.
Does Jennifer think Conservatives need a cloned Reagan? The purity meme is getting old. What a foolish woman.
We need a SPINE.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 52 - Posted by: JoElla Bee, 4/27/2013 3:02:34 PM     (No. 9299592)

FTA: "The old guard has become convinced that Reagan’s solutions to the problems of his time were the essence of conservatism — not simply conservative ideas appropriate for that era."

Rubin thinks we need to "move on" from what she considers ideas appropriate for a past era. That is a familiar argument. It is an argument made with regard to the U.S. Constitution and even the Holy Bible. To some, that "outdated worldview" and those old paths have served their time and purpose and this postmodern era requires a new kind of thinking for a new updated worldview.

Rubin says, "A successful political party must not just acknowledge new realities but adjust to them, even embrace them." She wants to "step away from the Reagan hymnal" and redefine conservatism.
That redefinition by the "New Right" means doing away with conservatism´s foundational principles.

But that old Book, the inspired word of God, and its precepts embraced by our Founding Documents have been the foundation of the most free and prosperous country the world has known. We have been able to adjust and overcome all obstacles ("new realities") so long as we remained true to those basic precepts and principles.

That old Book says in Jeremiah 6:16 -

Thus says the Lord:

“Stand in the ways and see,
And ask for the old paths, where the good way is,
And walk in it;
Then you will find rest for your souls.
But they said, ‘We will not walk in it.’




  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 53 - Posted by: JoElla Bee, 4/27/2013 3:03:49 PM     (No. 9299595)

#53 contd:

This country is ´going to hell in a handbasket´ and the new thinkers want to not only throw away the restorative "hymnal" that inspires a return to the old paths, but to embrace the "new realities" along the road to perdition where the blind are leading the blind, and the POTUS is asking the blessings of God on an organization known for embracing that new normal of abortion on demand - a woman´s right to have her baby murdered (and to make certain it dies even if the first attempt isn´t successful). What we need is enough leaders with the ability to see and to educate others to see before we are destroyed. May God help us to return to the old paths that lead to Him.




  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 54 - Posted by: BuckeyeRon, 4/27/2013 3:07:23 PM     (No. 9299599)

#51...I think you misconstrue the big tent...Reagan built a tent on a foundation of conservative principles and welcomed all to who chose to enter it, knowing they would be standing on that foundation. I´ll never forget a meeting he had with Jesse Jackson during the ´80 campaign, one Reagan insisted on but Jesse tried mightily to avoid because Jimmah Carter had him by the short hairs for misusing federal grant money...Reagan was lightly briefed because the meeting was literally scheduled at the last minute...Jesse tried to set him up by announcing to the traveling press the KKK in some small town had endorsed RR that morning...Reagan preempted him, announced his REJECTION of the endorsement and made it clear that those whose support he welcomed must accept his principles....

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 55 - Posted by: Susannah, 4/27/2013 3:40:19 PM     (No. 9299627)

#48 and #51, it was a joke playing on the observations made by earlier posters that Jennifer Rubin was posting here under various disguises, and based on the notion that anyone who agreed in any part with what Rubin said would automatically be branded a RINO. Perhaps I should have been more clear. As it happens, I DID read the article, and I agreed with many of the points that Rubin made. And I heartily agreed with both your posts.

As for a solution to the problem? I have no idea of how to sell conservative ideas to electorate that increasingly wants a nanny state. I wish I did.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 56 - Posted by: KingBubo, 4/27/2013 4:10:16 PM     (No. 9299658)

Yes and no. Many love Reagan (rightfully so), but do their best to ignore the 11th commandment.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 57 - Posted by: tisHimself, 4/27/2013 5:04:14 PM     (No. 9299695)

The big tent works a lot better when somebody not from the RockfellerBushRomney wing of the liberal republican wing holds the clip board and hires the entertainment. As for those Roverites who shrug their shoulders and admit they cannot sell conservative ideals-- we agree, you suck at it because you don´t believe in it. Stand aside.
As to the gnashing of teeth over the eleventh commandment-- all but one of the republican nomination seekers agreed to stay positive, but faced with the inability to get over 26% the guy with the money and nothing to sell went negative earliest, most often and didn´t look back. And Jennifer Rubin and the people here who parrot her vibe certainly weren´t troubled by the eleventh commandment then. Commandments only apply to the believers, the faithful, the bitter clingers. Enjoy the artichoke dip.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 58 - Posted by: TXknitter, 4/27/2013 7:16:18 PM     (No. 9299798)

#45, I am well aware of every fact you mentioned about one of our finest Presidents, Ronald Reagan. I did not say he could not WIN an election today. I am of the opinion that his core principles, crack intellect and outstanding speaking ability would serve him just as well today. Mark Levin was there and he saw first hand how the Rockefeller Republicans despised him. I read #40 and agree wholeheartedly with every word.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 59 - Posted by: rocket scientist, 4/27/2013 8:47:17 PM     (No. 9299859)

Some things I remember about Reagan, You could believe what he said. He meant what he said and said what he meant. You could trust him. He was truthful to Americans. He was anti-corruption. Now we have the exact opposite squatting in the White House. Obama lies all the time, you can´t believe a word he says and he is corrupt. I don´t understand why the Republicans don´t embrace being the anti-corruption party? They never talk about corruption, how money is misspent around Washington. The DemocRATS are thoroughly corrupt. Obamacare is corrupt. Unless the Repubs start to care about corruption, the TEA Party will overtake them and I will gladly support the TEA Party people over the corrupt establishment Repubs.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment



Post Reply   Close thread 733162




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Desert Fox"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Desert Fox"



Report: Hillary Clinton
Accused GOP Staffers of
Colluding with ´Extremists´
on Internet
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Warner Todd Huston    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/19/2014 7:46:15 PM     Post Reply
Just ahead of a possible Hillary run for the presidency, the Clinton Library released a new load of documents from President Bill Clinton’s years in the White House. One of those documents attempts to explain Hillary´s "vast right-wing conspiracy" claim in which the Clinton administration accused Republican staffers of colluding with "extremists" on the Internet to hurt the Clintons. On January 27, 1998, Hillary Clinton appeared on NBC´s Today Show. During her interview with Matt Lauer, she claimed that a "vast right-wing conspiracy" had been trying to destroy her husband "since the day he announced for president." That interview drew

A Lesson in Liberal/Democratic Party Hypocrisy
American Thinker, by Lloyd Marcus    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/19/2014 7:44:11 PM     Post Reply
What do Herman Cain, Sarah Palin, Ted Cruz, Tim Scott, Michele Bachmann, Condoleezza Rice, Allen West, Dr. Ben Carson, and TW Shannon all have in common? Calm down, Joseph. I see your hand, but I want someone else to answer for a change. No takers? Okay, Joseph. You are correct. They are hated by liberals and Democrats. Tell us why? Correct again, Joseph. They are women and minorities who honor God, family, and country. They are self-reliant, extremely successful and do not view themselves as victims. Liberals and Democrats will not tolerate such liberated independent thinking by women and minorities. It threatens the

British Photojournalist Finds
American Gun Owners Don´t
Fit ´Gun-Nut´ Stereotype
Breitbart´s Big Government, by AWR Hawkins    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/19/2014 7:40:04 PM     Post Reply
When British photojournalist Charles Ommanney traveled through six states to photograph American gun owners, he found something he did not expect: they don´t fit the stereotypes. According to PolicyMic.com, Ommanney was sent to photograph American gun owners for the German magazine Stern. In so doing, he discovered "people who are often far from the stereotypical vision of the American ´gun-nut.´" He found a teenager named Elizabeth, who posed with a Walther handgun "in front of a floral wallpaper backdrop." He found entire families--mother, father, daughter, son--who posed with their firearms of choice. Ommanney also found one woman with a pump shotgun for home

Documents: Bill Clinton Feared
Hillarycare Would Cause People
to Lose Insurance
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Warner Todd Huston    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/19/2014 7:32:59 PM     Post Reply
As the nation awaits Hillary Clinton´s decision of whether or not she will run for president in 2016, a cache of 7,500 pages of newly released documents from Bill Clinton´s years in the White House show some familiar political themes. One revelation is that Bill Clinton worried that a massive new healthcare scheme would cause Americans to lose their insurance. In 1993, the President allowed his wife, first lady Hillary Clinton, to become the face of an Obamacare-like takeover of the nation´s healthcare system. The plan was sarcastically dubbed Hillarycare. But as these internal documents show, in what is now a

´America´s royal baby´: How Chelsea´s first
child could give Hillary Clinton a boost in
the polls if she runs for president in 2016
Daily Mail (U.K.), by Jessica Jerreat    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/19/2014 7:12:10 PM     Post Reply
For Hillary Clinton, having her own baby grandchild to kiss on the campaign trail, could be one of the biggest boosts to her possible presidential election campaign. Although the former Secretary of State and First Lady has not said if she will run in 2016, the arrival of her first grandchild will soften her image, analysts have said. While Chelsea only revealed her pregnancy on Thursday, supporters of her mother have already started cooing over a possible baby in the White House. With the Clintons having a near-royal status in the U.S., the announcement of a new arrival due this fall has sent

Special Report: How the U.S.
made its Putin problem worse
Reuters, by David Rohde and Arshad Mohammed    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/19/2014 7:04:33 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON AND NEW YORK - In September 2001, as the U.S. reeled from the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, Vladimir Putin supported Washington´s imminent invasion of Afghanistan in ways that would have been inconceivable during the Cold War. He agreed that U.S. planes carrying humanitarian aid could fly through Russian air space. He said the U.S. military could use airbases in former Soviet republics in Central Asia. And he ordered his generals to brief their U.S. counterparts on their own ill-fated 1980s occupation of Afghanistan. During Putin´s visit to President George W. Bush´s Texas ranch two

Is THIS America´s newest top-secret spy
plane? Clearest picture yet of mystery
aircraft spotted flying over Kansas just
weeks after being seen in Texas
Daily Mail (U.K.), by Jonathan O´Callaghan*    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/19/2014 7:01:49 PM     Post Reply
A new photo of a mysterious flying object over Kansas has been revealed. It appears to be the same aircraft as one that was snapped soaring over Texas last month. The exact identify of the aircraft remains a mystery, but rumours abound that it could be a secret jet. ´The photo is grainy because it was taken with a hand-held maxed-out 400mm telephoto lens through a cloud layer and then it was severely cropped to bring it up even close,´ says Jeff Templin, who took the photo on 16 April. ´There is no way to know the altitude and no way to judge its



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



´America´s royal baby´: How Chelsea´s first
child could give Hillary Clinton a boost in
the polls if she runs for president in 2016

42 replie(s)
Daily Mail (U.K.), by Jessica Jerreat    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/19/2014 7:12:10 PM     Post Reply
For Hillary Clinton, having her own baby grandchild to kiss on the campaign trail, could be one of the biggest boosts to her possible presidential election campaign. Although the former Secretary of State and First Lady has not said if she will run in 2016, the arrival of her first grandchild will soften her image, analysts have said. While Chelsea only revealed her pregnancy on Thursday, supporters of her mother have already started cooing over a possible baby in the White House. With the Clintons having a near-royal status in the U.S., the announcement of a new arrival due this fall has sent

Living in the New York Times World
39 replie(s)
American Thinker, by J. Paul Masko    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/19/2014 7:48:36 AM     Post Reply
I began reading the entirety of the first section of the New York Times at nine years old, and continued that practice, more or less, for decades.(snip) ...the power of reverence, intrinsic to what I call the “cascade” of The Times: the near avalanche-like flow and distribution of information through electronic and print networks: through like-minded network newscasts, magazines, local newspaper s, blogs, daytime talk TV, late-night entertainment, statements at media award ceremonies, the celebrity Twitterverse, etc. The cascade rolls through Saturday Night Live, Jon Stewart, The New Yorker, the mouths of third-grade teachers, Elmo, Madonna and Susan Sarandon …through

Barack Obama and the politics of lies
35 replie(s)
Washington Examiner [DC], by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/20/2014 5:45:25 AM     Post Reply
That was quite a victory dance President Obama did Thursday while claiming Obamacare is “working” because eight million people have now supposedly signed up for the health care program. He even indulged in some less-than-subtle mockery of Republicans - and by extension the majority of Americans who have disapproved of Obamacare since before it became law. "The repeal debate is and should be over,” Obama said, taking a dig at Republicans who are “going through, you know, the stages of grief … anger and denial and all that stuff …” But a president who is viewed by most Americans as less

In a Hole, Golf Considers
Digging a Wider One

32 replie(s)
New York Times, by Bill Pennington    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/19/2014 10:48:33 AM     Post Reply
GREENSBORO, Ga. — Golf holes the size of pizzas. Soccer balls on the back nine. A mulligan on every hole. These are some of the measures — some would say gimmicks — that golf courses across the country have experimented with to stop people from quitting the game. Golf has always reveled in its standards and rich tradition. But increasingly a victim of its own image and hidebound ways, golf has lost five million players in the last decade, according to the National Golf Foundation, with 20 percent of the existing 25 million golfers apt to quit in the next few years. People under 35 have especially spurned the game, saying it takes too

White House asks American parents to
monitor their children for signs of terrorism

32 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Eric Owens    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/19/2014 5:50:04 PM     Post Reply
In a speech earlier this week, Lisa O. Monaco, President Barack Obama’s assistant for homeland security and counterterrorism, insisted that American parents must be vigilant because their “confrontational” children could be on the verge of becoming terrorists. Monaco’s full, prepared text is available here. She presented the speech, entitled “Countering Violent Extremism and the Power of Community,” at Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government on April 15. Monaco began her remarks by eloquently describing the lives tragically lost last year during the Boston Marathon bombings. Interestingly, the Harvard grad failed to mention the religion or the motive of brothers Dzhokhar and Tamerlan

Obama: ´For me, Easter is a story of hope,
a belief in a better day to come´

30 replie(s)
Investor´s Business Daily, by Andrew Malcolm    Original Article
Posted By: SurferLad- 4/19/2014 9:16:36 AM     Post Reply
Hi, everybody. For millions of Americans, this time of year holds great meaning. Earlier this week, we hosted a Passover Seder at the White House, and joined Jewish families around the world in their re-tellings of the story of the Exodus and the victory of faith over oppression. And this Sunday, Michelle, Malia, Sasha, and I will join our fellow Christians around the world in celebrating the Resurrection of Christ, the salvation he offered the world, and the hope that comes with the Easter season. These holy days have their roots in miracles that took place long ago. And yet, they still inspire us, guide us, and strengthen us today. They remind us of our

Harry Reid calls dissident Nevada ranchers
´domestic terrorists´ following show of
force against the federal government

30 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by David Martosko    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/19/2014 9:29:17 AM     Post Reply
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said Thursday that a family of dissident ranchers and their supporters in his home state of Nevada are ´domestic terrorists,´ citing this week´s standoff with the federal government´s Bureau of Land Management. Cliven Bundy has refused to pay grazing fees for land where his hundreds of cattle roam every day. The land is owned by the federal government, which says he owes more than $1 million. Bundy, however, insists that since his family has been using the land since the 1870s, Uncle Sam can´t collect the grazing fees. A tense standoff developed this week after


Post Reply   Close thread 733162





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~