A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC



        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


  Topic: Gay Marriage: Bill O´Reilly
Misses the Point
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Gay Marriage: Bill O´Reilly
Misses the Point

American Thinker, by Monte Kuligowski

Original Article

Posted By:magnante, 4/8/2013 10:57:12 AM

During the highly publicized exchange between Bill O´Reilly and Laura Ingraham on gay marriage, O´Reilly made this statement: "There are Bible thumpers, and all they do is say, ´I object to gay marriage because God objects to it.´ You don´t win a policy debate in America with that." Really? Before central control out of Washington was imposed in 2003, policy arguments for criminalizing homosexual acts were won explicitly "with that." And because of "that," the idea of gay marriage has been unthinkable throughout the history of the American nation.

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: LudicrousSextus, 4/8/2013 11:10:33 AM     (No. 9265234)

It´s pretty amusing watching this all play out. The gay ´activist´ scenario basically antagonized the APA into removing ´gay´ from the DSM-II in the early 70´s - and pretty much every ´advance´ since then has resulted from the same thing - gay activists antagonizing people who don´t believe as they do.

And O´Reilly does miss the point - perhaps he should inform his viewers what the ´gay lobby´ has done to American children over the last dozen years of preaching ´Normal and Healthy!´ to captive grammar school kids, indoctrinating them with garbage advice - to the tune of (currently) 1000 new cases of HIV in 12-21 year old males *monthly* - the only demographic where HIV is still on the upswing.

We´re basically just watching mental health issues ´normalized´ in this country at this point.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: lostinmassachusetts, 4/8/2013 11:38:12 AM     (No. 9265291)

BOR misses the point by a mile. Has he not considered why a society should care about the sexual practices of its members, other than for religious reasons? What is as stake for a society to encourage and certify heterosexual unions, as has been the case since ancient times? Is it not to ensure it can continue to exist by producing new healthy and productive members, and stable social units (families). This is why all societies in the past (including pagan ones, which did not eschew homosexual relations) promoted and protected heterosexual marriage as the cornerstone of their social structure. Surely O´Reilly as a former history teacher should know this.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: mickturn, 4/8/2013 11:44:40 AM     (No. 9265305)

No Spin Zone is a Joke...more like the Bill BS Fest!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: FelineFine, 4/8/2013 11:49:19 AM     (No. 9265316)

Does anyone still watch this BORe?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: terrywhite, 4/8/2013 11:53:44 AM     (No. 9265328)

Guess Mr. Bill never heard of Martin Luther King, Jr., who marched and demanded equality for blacks while referring to and quoting what God and his justice as presented in His word, the Bible, demand. In other words, our public policy should be based on unchanging truths and righteousness, not on the whims of the day. I can´t imagine a situation where doing what is right will counter what the Bible says! In this case, it affirms that same sex relations are wrong.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: msjena, 4/8/2013 12:16:45 PM     (No. 9265364)

We never would have ended slavery in this country if we had had to deal with those Bible-thumpers. Oh wait....

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    10 persons like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: absalom, 4/8/2013 12:20:24 PM     (No. 9265375)

Does the institution of marriage, which evolved from the dawn of man, in order to socialize children and self regulate sexual activity, pre-date its religious formalities? Yes or no. If yes, then the institution can be firmly defended as a bedrock of culture and civilization; w/o the need for quotations from the Bible, as worthy as they are. Formal religion, due to multiple self inflicted woulds, is held in low esteem by many. Using it to make the case against homosexual ´marriage´ is a weak reed and a mistake. And O´Reilly is indeed a moron.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: belwhatter, 4/8/2013 12:23:00 PM     (No. 9265382)

The Bible set out the laws for living,and there were ten commandments as well as numerous other cautionary statements and illustrations by metaphor on how to do this. The dangers of deliberately ignoring God´s laws are all around us unfortunately as man sets himself over God. Marriage is primarily for the procreation of the species and as such should be protected. Sinfully ignoring this brings a terrible result, the physical body breaks down to match the break down of moral laws.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    8 persons like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: sunsong, 4/8/2013 12:46:54 PM     (No. 9265411)

This silly little man misses the point. America is NOT a theocracy. If you want that move to Iran or Saudi Arabia where nobody can *violate* what their good book says.

This is America where people are free to do what others consider sin. The Catholic believe that divorce and adultey and pre-marital sex are sins - but people are free to do them.

This argument was lost a long time ago. O Reilly is right. People who want to force others to live by their beliefs or their religion or their morality are immoral! It is about freedom in America and those who are attempting to abolish free will are the true sinners here.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    8 persons like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: marthaville, 4/8/2013 12:59:30 PM     (No. 9265433)

Is O´Reilly homosexual or bisexual? We learned a few years ago he likes to talk dirty on the telephone, but his opposition to what Laura Ingraham said makes me wonder if he is intimately familiar with the practices of homosexuals.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: veritas, 4/8/2013 1:42:19 PM     (No. 9265495)

"Bill O´Reilly Misses the Point"

I think that headline might have been swiped from Taranto´s "News of the Tautological."

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    11 persons like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Dignitary Protection, 4/8/2013 2:06:11 PM     (No. 9265531)

In answer to #4, yes I do...BUT I DVR it. I still like Dennis Miller, Bernie Goldberg and the like but fast forward through all the liberals.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    8 persons like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: ebuilder, 4/8/2013 3:15:23 PM     (No. 9265627)

What if everything has a moral context? What if wisdom and discernment and every word in every sentence, in order to make sense, have a moral context? What if sanity itself has a moral context? So that when you try to look "fair" and "amoral" and think you can look out for everyone, including the rich bubble of the hour, your circle of "strange" and narcissist luftmenschen who do not have a controlling legal authority and do not want one -- maybe it is your side that is one dimensional. Is it better to be fair, or to be stupid? Is their a moral context for "stupid" vs. "ignorant"? "Stupid" is a stubborn schlimiel who will finally ruin a country by championing 50 equal and polyamorous internationalist moralities under one big tent, unprincipled social contract, for fairness sake -- then realize he will have to get the folks to champion the need for something like sharia law to guide all men back to the ability to make sense based on "something." "Stupid" goes forward with no vision towards the brave new world of transformed morality. Can you possibly understand this, or do you really "know not what you do?" PS -- the Army Training Manual just called Christian evangelists "extremists like Al Qiadda". Any vision of where this is going?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    8 persons like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: Rinktum, 4/8/2013 3:40:30 PM     (No. 9265657)

Bill O´Reilly- I´d like to buy him for what he´s worth and sell him for what he thinks he´s worth.

He is so sure of his opinions that he rejects out of hand any differing thoughts from anyone else. This is not a wise man. I believe it is called being a foolish blowhard.

He needs to stick to writing non-fiction for children. He did write a great book about Lincoln that my 11 year old grandson loved.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: bemused conservative, 4/8/2013 3:52:07 PM     (No. 9265672)

I love how arguments against same sex marriage always reference what God wants, as though anyone knows. I would think that if God disapproved of homosexuality it wouldn´t exist. Of course, that´s assuming that God gives a rat´s keister about this blue dot at all.

Stop dragging "God´s will" into it and stand on your own feet. You don´t like homos. Great. Don´t marry one.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    6 persons like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: Razorgirl, 4/8/2013 4:26:48 PM     (No. 9265708)

Have you noticed that from the start this administration has made it their goal to change the definitions of things or to rename things? Their current cause is the definition of marriage. So what will they choose next? Oh yes, no more illegal immigrant. They believe if they change the words they can more easily control the conversation. And guess what? It´s working.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 730284




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "magnante"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "magnante"



White House honors French neo-Marxist
American Thinker, by Thomas Lifson    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/20/2014 9:11:28 AM     Post Reply
Thomas Piketty may not be a household name in this country (yet), but the French economist who is updating Karl Marx has quite a following at the White House and among thought leaders of the Democratic Party. Thomas Hubert of France24 explains: In his latest book, French economist Thomas Piketty warns that modern-day capitalism leads to unsustainable levels of inequality. (Snip) So far this week, he has met the White House’s Council of Economic Advisors as well as Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew. “The Democratic Party, especially the Obama administration, has been in contact with us and using our findings for

Living in the New York Times World
American Thinker, by J. Paul Masko    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/19/2014 7:48:36 AM     Post Reply
I began reading the entirety of the first section of the New York Times at nine years old, and continued that practice, more or less, for decades.(snip) ...the power of reverence, intrinsic to what I call the “cascade” of The Times: the near avalanche-like flow and distribution of information through electronic and print networks: through like-minded network newscasts, magazines, local newspaper s, blogs, daytime talk TV, late-night entertainment, statements at media award ceremonies, the celebrity Twitterverse, etc. The cascade rolls through Saturday Night Live, Jon Stewart, The New Yorker, the mouths of third-grade teachers, Elmo, Madonna and Susan Sarandon …through

Labor Fascism in Chattanooga
American Thinker, by Mathew Vadum    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/18/2014 9:08:36 AM     Post Reply
As the labor movement tells the story, two months ago, the silly, ungrateful Volkswagen factory workers in Tennessee foolishly rejected the generous invitation of the company and the United Auto Workers to welcome the Detroit-killing union with open arms. In an election supervised by the federal National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), the workers in VW´s Chattanooga plant rejected UAW representation by a vote of 712 to 626. Amazingly, the UAW and the automaker both refuse to take the workers´ "no" for an answer. The two sides are acting in unison to overturn the democratically expressed will of the workers. Nullifying an election by

Bundy and ´Civil Disobedience´
American Thinker, by Rick Moran    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/17/2014 10:02:46 AM     Post Reply
For more than 160 years, Henry David Thoreau´s essay on Civil Disobedience has inspired Americans to "make known what kind of government would command his respect" so that we could live under that government in good conscience. Ultimately, in a free society, that´s all we have that is truly our own; our conscience. Following its dictates, says Thoreau, is the only rational way to live your life and be true to oneself. It had been years since I read Civil Disobedience and I was surpised by how Cliven Bundy´s words echoed many of the theses in the essay. Legal experts overwhelmingly agree

Soros and the Bundy Ranch
American Thinker, by M. Catharine Evans    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/17/2014 10:00:58 AM     Post Reply
A Soros-funded nonprofit New Yorker magazine called “one of the most important radical environmental groups in the country” has issued a statement denouncing the Bureau of Land Management‘s (BLM) decision to back away from a showdown with Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy and hundreds of supporters. A scientist for The Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) blasted BLM saying the federal agency “has a sacred duty to manage our public lands in the public interest…instead it is allowing a freeloading rancher and armed thugs to seize hundreds of thousands of acres of the people’s land as their own fiefdom.” CBD is funded by Earthjustice

   

 



 
More prog-on-prog class
warfare in San Francisco
American Thinker, by Thomas Lifson    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/16/2014 9:37:52 AM     Post Reply
If you live in flyover country, lay in a supply of popcorn and get ready to watch a continuing comedy drama being staged for your amusement by the progressives of San Francisco. The driving force is the classic dirty little secret of progressivism, greed and envy, and these deadly sins are amply on display in Baghdad-by-the-Bay these days.(snip)Yesterday, hundreds of SEIU members rallied in front of Twitter HQ to denounce the greed of the company that provides jobs and plenty of other tax revenue to assorted governments that employ SEIU members. John Coté reports for the SF Chronicle: City nurses [who

The New Liberal Racism
American Thinker, by E.W. Jackson    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/16/2014 9:20:02 AM     Post Reply
Last week we witnessed repeated efforts by Democrats to polarize the country along racial lines. Eric Holder, speaking at Al Sharpton´s conference, implied that he and the President are being treated harshly because they are black. (snip) The Republican base that Steve Israel says is animated by racism, nominated me -- an American of African descent and a great grandson of slaves -- for Lt. Governor of Virginia. They embraced me warmly, treated me respectfully and supported me enthusiastically. The liberal media on the other hand set out to destroy me. My white Democrat opponent was even caught on camera



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



´America´s royal baby´: How Chelsea´s first
child could give Hillary Clinton a boost in
the polls if she runs for president in 2016

42 replie(s)
Daily Mail (U.K.), by Jessica Jerreat    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/19/2014 7:12:10 PM     Post Reply
For Hillary Clinton, having her own baby grandchild to kiss on the campaign trail, could be one of the biggest boosts to her possible presidential election campaign. Although the former Secretary of State and First Lady has not said if she will run in 2016, the arrival of her first grandchild will soften her image, analysts have said. While Chelsea only revealed her pregnancy on Thursday, supporters of her mother have already started cooing over a possible baby in the White House. With the Clintons having a near-royal status in the U.S., the announcement of a new arrival due this fall has sent

Living in the New York Times World
39 replie(s)
American Thinker, by J. Paul Masko    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/19/2014 7:48:36 AM     Post Reply
I began reading the entirety of the first section of the New York Times at nine years old, and continued that practice, more or less, for decades.(snip) ...the power of reverence, intrinsic to what I call the “cascade” of The Times: the near avalanche-like flow and distribution of information through electronic and print networks: through like-minded network newscasts, magazines, local newspaper s, blogs, daytime talk TV, late-night entertainment, statements at media award ceremonies, the celebrity Twitterverse, etc. The cascade rolls through Saturday Night Live, Jon Stewart, The New Yorker, the mouths of third-grade teachers, Elmo, Madonna and Susan Sarandon …through

Barack Obama and the politics of lies
35 replie(s)
Washington Examiner [DC], by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/20/2014 5:45:25 AM     Post Reply
That was quite a victory dance President Obama did Thursday while claiming Obamacare is “working” because eight million people have now supposedly signed up for the health care program. He even indulged in some less-than-subtle mockery of Republicans - and by extension the majority of Americans who have disapproved of Obamacare since before it became law. "The repeal debate is and should be over,” Obama said, taking a dig at Republicans who are “going through, you know, the stages of grief … anger and denial and all that stuff …” But a president who is viewed by most Americans as less

In a Hole, Golf Considers
Digging a Wider One

32 replie(s)
New York Times, by Bill Pennington    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/19/2014 10:48:33 AM     Post Reply
GREENSBORO, Ga. — Golf holes the size of pizzas. Soccer balls on the back nine. A mulligan on every hole. These are some of the measures — some would say gimmicks — that golf courses across the country have experimented with to stop people from quitting the game. Golf has always reveled in its standards and rich tradition. But increasingly a victim of its own image and hidebound ways, golf has lost five million players in the last decade, according to the National Golf Foundation, with 20 percent of the existing 25 million golfers apt to quit in the next few years. People under 35 have especially spurned the game, saying it takes too

Obama: ´For me, Easter is a story of hope,
a belief in a better day to come´

30 replie(s)
Investor´s Business Daily, by Andrew Malcolm    Original Article
Posted By: SurferLad- 4/19/2014 9:16:36 AM     Post Reply
Hi, everybody. For millions of Americans, this time of year holds great meaning. Earlier this week, we hosted a Passover Seder at the White House, and joined Jewish families around the world in their re-tellings of the story of the Exodus and the victory of faith over oppression. And this Sunday, Michelle, Malia, Sasha, and I will join our fellow Christians around the world in celebrating the Resurrection of Christ, the salvation he offered the world, and the hope that comes with the Easter season. These holy days have their roots in miracles that took place long ago. And yet, they still inspire us, guide us, and strengthen us today. They remind us of our

Harry Reid calls dissident Nevada ranchers
´domestic terrorists´ following show of
force against the federal government

30 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by David Martosko    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/19/2014 9:29:17 AM     Post Reply
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said Thursday that a family of dissident ranchers and their supporters in his home state of Nevada are ´domestic terrorists,´ citing this week´s standoff with the federal government´s Bureau of Land Management. Cliven Bundy has refused to pay grazing fees for land where his hundreds of cattle roam every day. The land is owned by the federal government, which says he owes more than $1 million. Bundy, however, insists that since his family has been using the land since the 1870s, Uncle Sam can´t collect the grazing fees. A tense standoff developed this week after

White House asks American parents to
monitor their children for signs of terrorism

29 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Eric Owens    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/19/2014 5:50:04 PM     Post Reply
In a speech earlier this week, Lisa O. Monaco, President Barack Obama’s assistant for homeland security and counterterrorism, insisted that American parents must be vigilant because their “confrontational” children could be on the verge of becoming terrorists. Monaco’s full, prepared text is available here. She presented the speech, entitled “Countering Violent Extremism and the Power of Community,” at Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government on April 15. Monaco began her remarks by eloquently describing the lives tragically lost last year during the Boston Marathon bombings. Interestingly, the Harvard grad failed to mention the religion or the motive of brothers Dzhokhar and Tamerlan

   

Post Reply   Close thread 730284





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~