The air has been full of 10th-anniversary Iraq war retrospectives. One that caught my eye was a smart piece by Tom Curry, national affairs writer for NBC News, who wrote of one element of the story, the war´s impact on the Republican Party: "The conflict not only transformed" the GOP, "but all of American politics." It has, but it´s an unfinished transformation. Did the Iraq war hurt the GOP? Yes. The war, and the crash of ´08, half killed it. It´s still digging out, and whether it can succeed is an open question.
Talleyrand remarked; "It was far, far worse than a Russian military catastrophe; it was a mistake. And great nations cannot make such mistakes and remain great." Iraq was a mistake of the first magnitude and wholly owned by the biggest buffoon to sit in the WH in 100 years; the consequences of which will reverberate for generations.
The so called ´Crash of ´08´ was triggered purposely by George Soros to slow the sudden burst of popularity of the McCain/Palin ticket. McCain played his hand so poorly in that September time period that he never got the chance to win in the November election. His further inability stop those members of his own staff from taking very loud and very vocal potshots at Palin during a running campaign finished the barrage and then sunk him.
I understand that George W. Bush went wobbly and wandered, almost pandered to the left in his last three years, but my biggest problem was that he or members of his team, lead by Karl Rove, never ONCE stood up and called the traitorous left out for the series of outright lies they told about him. I know he signed on to many things that furthered Agenda 21 and lots of other bad things but never once did I ever question his love for America. I question every motive, every word, and every thought that emanates from this administration.
#4 forgets (or, more likely, conveniently ignores) that going into Iraq was very much a bipartisan decision with the explicit support of, for instance, both Clintons, John Kerry, Al Gore, Harry Reid, and a cast of hundreds of prominent Democrats. (Only the Occupy Wall Street types didn´t support the war.) Most of the world´s intelligence agencies thought (correctly, in hindsight) that Saddam Hussein, who had used lethal gas on the Kurds, killing thousands, had an active WMD program, the contents of which were spirited over the border into Assad´s Syria just before the bombs fell in 2003. If Baby Assad is using poison gas on his own population now, he´s probably using some of Saddam´s old stock.
And speaking of the sadistic Saddam, he had in recent years invaded Iran, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia, and was a clear and present danger to any kind of peace or stability in that vital region. Iraq, because of its location and proximity to so many neighbors (the "keystone state") in the region, had a murderous ruler who had to be put down. So he was.
It´s only ignorance--carefully cuiltivated by the MSM and people like #4--that places sole responsibility for the Iraq war on the Republicans. The war wasn´t prosecuted properly until the surge that won the war, but the war was won. If the strategically inept--if not actively treasonous--actions of Obama reverse tha gains, the onus will be on him where it belongs.
The USA gave Iraq, which has superabundant natural resources (oil, gas, gold, arable land, etc.), an opportunity to become a wealthy and independent nation. Whether or not Iraq achieves that won´t be known for several years. But at least they have a chance.
I will go to my grave loathing the Democrat party for trying to have me shot in the jungles of Viet Nam. The reservoir of hatred for warmongers is vast and deep. I do not hate W, I pity him. He was weak minded and allowed the neocons to manipulate him. He was not actively evil, like LBJ. But nonetheless he was amazingly effective at destroying the GOP.
It seemed to me that we had stabilized Iraq and established a strategic presence in the Middle East. That seemed to be a victory or at least, progress. Perhaps, if we had not given it all up, Iran would not be so threatening today.
What is wrong with this woman? Iraq was a major success for America--not just the Republican Party. A brutal dictator who was hostile to the US and who had nuclear ambitions was replaced with a democratic government. That is more than can be said of half of Europe after World War II!
Noonan is just sore because GW did not hire her and Reagan had long since tired of her and rarely talked with her. As for GW - strong and steady and was the first president to have to deal with a deadly attack on the USA. Noonan was on TV with someone prattling about how wonderful she is and how she did all of the work. Nonsense and so is the troll that trashed GW.
This little rant is stupid and beyond irrelevant. By all signs Peggy Noonan is, or soon will be, senile. She´s "calling for debate"? Give me a break. Who could possibly care? She voted for Obama in 2008. And she fawned over him like a love struck teenage girl in the run-up to the election. You can look it up. Is Iraq better off today than it was under Saddam? The Iraqis think so. Obama has tried for 4 years to grab defeat from the jaws of victory. But he´s just too stupid to pull it off. He doesn´t care about Iraq. He´s more interested in destroying America.
The justified removal of Saddam Hussein was exploited mercilessly by the loathsome MSM as an ax with which to split open the head of the GOP. It was their best chance since Vietnam to show that it was they, the loathsome MSM, who were "anti-war" and Republicans who heartlessly rejoiced at the deaths of brown-skinned "freedom fighters". The loathsome MSM succeeded magnificently in this campaign of lies.
To discuss "...the war´s impact on the Republican Party" as Peggy Noonan and others are doing now, with little regard to the MSM dirty tricks that poisoned world opinion - the actual heart of the problem, not the Iraq war itself - is worse than counterproductive. Had the removal of a terrorist-supporting arab dictator with potential to spread WMDs been led by a Democrat president, we all know how "anti-war" the loathsome MSM would have been then, and how many times Abu Ghraib would have been headlined (zero times, instead of hundreds). We see this hypocrisy even now, as not one single "grim milestone" has blanketed the airwaves since Dear Leader began his White House occupation.
W made many mistakes, but prosecuting the war like a true commander in chief was not one of them. The issue here, Peggy, is not Republican policy on national defense. It is the false image and hateful attitude intentionally conveyed by the loathsome MSM about Republican policy on national defense. If you can´t separate the two, you are not a clear thinker. W did more for world peace than any person alive today, and is ruthlessly scorned for it. The moral coward of a Marxist fraud gets the Nobel Peace Prize, and the world cheers. Analyze that, and you´ll understand the actual threat to the party so much better.
The Iraq war went exceptionally well, and was over in 3 weeks. The occupation, after the war was won, failed. We forgot to make the occupation painful, decisive, and final, then backing out and letting Iraq rebuild for themselves. We got all PC, to show the world and our idiot media we care. Dumb idea.
Well said, #22. The invasion of Iraq was justified and well done. What puzzles me is the aftermath. What made us think that the Sunnis and Shiites, suddenly given freedom from tyranny, would not fight for supremacy, having been at odds since the Seventh Century? I have found that difficult to comprehend.
We could have left the country in a shambles and let them fight it out, but al Qaeda would have lept into the gap and taken advantage of their partisan idiocies. Tactically, perhaps we should have acted like conquerors and kicked one party or both into submission before leaving. That might have provided a level of stability to prevent the insurgence of al Qaeda, but it is not our style.
I don´t pretend to know how it should have ended, but I never have doubted the necessity of unseating Saddam. Let´s try to differentiate the two issues before discussing the cost of Iraq. I believe the Iraqi invasion saved us from a nuclear, Saddam -aided holocaust.
Having spent two decades in the Middle East, allow me to share a little reality w/the arm chair von Clausewitz´s. After Schwarzkopf drove the Iraqi´s from Kuwait, the USAF imposed no fly zones in the Kurdish north and Shiite south,´killing´ anything that moved and gradually strangling Baghdad. Our drone and manned tech, owned the Iraqi air. Yet Bush opted for a land war which Tommy Franks executed brilliantly, via a helo/tank blitz through the Euphrates and Tigris Valley storming Baghdad in less than 100 days. That was the decisive moment to impose order and bend Iraq to our will; so where was the plan??? THERE WAS NO PLAN! Bush fantasizing about Arab Democracy; w/Baghdad as Paris ´44, and Iraqi´s showering our troops w/candy, flowers and kisses; NEVER HAD A PLAN, and the results were catastrophic. In fact, 99.4% of our casualties were sustained after the collapse of Baghdad. Most tellingly, Iraq remains an unstable, ungovernable and violent cauldron of religious and sectarian hatred now moving rapidly into the orbit of Iran w/the political ascendance of the Shia. The usual suspects will eternally carry water for Bush, no matter what. A example is their WMD canard, a thoroughly discredited fantasy, they repeat endlessly to excuse Bush´s incompetence. Also, for the record, the gas Saddam deployed against the Kurd was Phosgene; first used at Ypres in 1915 and it´s not a WMD. So I guess Talleyrand was wrong and mistakes like this don´t matter after all. So be it. Bush is the core reason Obama sits in the WH today.
Since I often agree with #4 on things domestic, I approach our disagreements on foreign policy with caution. We simply see things differently. Here´s how I see it: The Muslim terror attacks on New York and Washington showed the world how easy it is to kill an American city. They also invalidated a central premise of post-World War II national security: Mutually Assured Destruction. We cannot deter terrorists who want to die; we cannot rely on MAD to stop madmen. We can only kill them before they kill us. Regimes that seek the intersection between terrorist delivery systems and genocidal intent are a clear and present danger to the American republic and must be eliminated. Iraq was such a regime and is no longer.
Time will compare the success of the Iraq intervention to the Afghanistan intervention. Bush won and quietly shipped out thousands of tons of yellow cake that Hussein had accumulated. Just for contrast, last year insurgents slipped onto a US air base and destroyed 8 Harrier jump jets and killed the American commander. Give me Bush any day.
The best that can be said about the House-Senate budget deal announced late Tuesday is that it includes no tax increases, no new incentives for not working, and some modest entitlement reforms. Oh, and it will avoid another shutdown fiasco, assuming enough Republicans refuse to attempt suicide a second time. The worst part of the two-year deal is that it breaks the 2011 Budget Control Act´s discretionary spending caps for fiscal years 2014 and 2015. The deal breaks the caps by some $63 billion over the two years and then re-establishes the caps starting in 2016 where they are in current
As he was ascending to the pinnacle of power in the Senate Republican conference almost exactly seven years ago, Mitch McConnell planted the seeds of a feud that could conceivably end his career this May. Democrats, capitalizing on the public’s weariness with the Iraq War and outrage at the GOP’s Abramoff-era corruption, had taken control of both houses of Congress. And McConnell had been unanimously elected minority leader. As they are today, Republicans were searching for a way to reconnect with the public. McConnell, for example, canceled an annual lobbyist-funded retreat at the tony Greenbrier resort in West Virginia in favor of
Pope Francis issued his first apostolic exhortation this week, and it has created quite a firestorm. A Google news search on ´Pope´ following the release of exhortation turned up all kinds of stories proclaiming that Pope Francis says Capitalism is ´evil´ from major news sources raning from the Chicago Tribune to ABC News to the Washington Post. Yahoo News ran AP writer Nicole Winfield´s article about the exhortation, Evangelii Gaudium, (The Joy of the Gospel), with a headline that initially said something like ´Pope Blasts Capitalism, says rich should share the wealth.´ After 12 hours the headline changed to "Pope issues
Paul Ryan is ready to move beyond last year’s failed presidential campaign and the budget committee chairmanship that has defined him to embark on an ambitious new project: Steering Republicans away from the angry, nativist inclinations of the tea party movement and toward the more inclusive vision of his mentor, the late Jack Kemp. Since February, Ryan (R-Wis.) has been quietly visiting inner-city neighborhoods with another old Kemp ally, Bob Woodson, the 76-year-old civil rights activist and anti-poverty crusader, to talk to ex-convicts and recovering addicts about the means of their salvation. Ryan’s staff, meanwhile, has been trolling center-right think
In the recent government shutdown fight I found myself in polite (on my part at least!) disagreement with the elements of the right inclined to denounce the “Republican establishment.” No need to rehash all that again. But, I will say that in the wake of the Cuccinelli defeat, I think the critics of the establishment have the better side of the argument. If the folks running the party want the tea partiers to support their preferred candidates — when they’re the nominee, at least — it should work the other way around as well. It now appears that Cuccinelli, a
A campaign strategist for Republican Virginia gubernatorial candidate Ken Cuccinelli said that the national GOP abandoned the campaign in its final days. At the end of the race, Cuccinelli was closing in on Democrat Terry McAuliffe, who eked out a two-point victory on Tuesday despite exit polls that showed McAuliffe was up by seven points. According to the Washington Post, Chris La Civita said that financial support from national Republican sources dried up on October 1. “There are a lot of questions people are going to be asking and that is, was leaving Cuccinelli alone in the first week of October, a smart
Boyd Marcus, the chief of staff for Cantor until 2003—who later teamed with another GOP operative Ray Allen to found the firm Marcus Allen, which Cantor employed until earlier this year—joined the McAuliffe campaign after Lt. Gov. Bill Bolling, with whom Marcus campaigned, did not win the GOP nominee in Virginia. “I was looking at the candidates, and I saw Terry McAuliffe as the guy who will work with everybody to get things done,” Marcus told the Associated Press in August when he joined McAuliffe’s campaign. Cantor employed Marcus Allen until the day before Marcus left the firm to work
When I was a kid, I knew two different Santa Clauses. The first had a fat belly, rosy cheeks, a long white beard, and skin as pink as bubble gum. He was omnipresent, visiting my pre-school and the local mall, visible in all of my favorite Christmas specials. Then there was the Santa in my family’s household, in the form of ornaments, cards, and holiday figurines. A near-carbon copy of the first one—big belly, rosy cheeks, long white beard: check, check, check. But his skin was as dark as mine. Seeing two different Santas was bewildering. Eventually I asked my father what
US President Barack Obama may have moved the masses attending Nelson Mandela’s memorial service with his stirring eulogy, but it was his grinning "selfie" with the Danish and British premiers that set social networks abuzz. In a candid moment captured by a photographer, Denmark’s Prime Minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt can be seen holding up her smartphone, with Obama lending a helping hand, as they pose for a picture with David Cameron, all three of them smiling broadly in their seats at Soweto’s World Cup stadium.(Snip)Mashable, the news and technology website, ran the photograph under the headline: ‘‘Dear Obama: Funerals are no place
Johannesburg - A man who provided sign language interpretation on stage for Nelson Mandela´s memorial service, attended by scores of heads of state, was a "fake," the national director of the Deaf Federation of South Africa said on Tuesday. Asked about the claim by The Associated Press, South Africa´s government said it was preparing a statement. Three sign language experts said the man was not signing in South African or American sign languages. South African sign language covers all of the country´s 11 official languages, according to the federation. It wasn´t immediately clear if the unidentified man was using a
On his way to the podium at the memorial ceremony for former South African president Nelson Mandela, President Obama walked down the line of dignitaries, greeting other leaders there to pay their respects. Among the hands shaken: that of Cuban leader Raul Castro. Obama neither made a special effort to shake Castro’s hand nor to avoid him. A snub might have been awkward: In his speech, Obama praised Mandela’s “greatest gift” as “his recognition that we are all bound together in ways that can be invisible to the eye; that there is a oneness to humanity; that we achieve ourselves by
House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) snapped at conservative groups that have come out in opposition to the budget deal reached Wednesday between Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) and Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.). "They´re using the American people for their own purposes. This is ridiculous," Boehner said at a press conference with other members of House Republican leadership on Wednesday. Over the past few days, a number of conservative groups have blasted the deal because it sets discretionary spending levels in the budget higher than previous levels under sequestration. In the past three days, the influential Heritage Action, Club for Growth, Americans
The Obama State Department has finally released a second round of photos revealing the harrowing devastation wrought by a terrorist attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi on Sept. 11, 2012. The new photographs depict rampant damage to the consulate. They show charred walls, smoldering fires, Arabic graffiti defacing exterior walls, and scattered debris throughout. The extent of the damage would lead any reasonably serious person to conclude that this was a cold, calculated attack, carefully coordinated to mark the 11th anniversary of Sept. 11, 2001. Unfortunately for the American people, the Obama-Clinton-Rice cabal that led to the Benghazi cover-up was
A black fashion student says he was brutally attacked by a gang of Hasidic men who shouted anti-gay slurs at him while he was walking through Williamsburg after a night of partying, the Daily News has learned. Taj Patterson, 22, was headed home to Fort Greene around 4:30 a.m. on Dec. 1 when he says more than a dozen ultra-Orthodox Jewish men began assaulting him on Flushing Ave. and yelling, “Stay down, f----t!”