A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Top Romney Strategist
Stuart Stevens says media
´not in the tank´ for
President Obama
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Top Romney Strategist
Stuart Stevens says media
´not in the tank´ for
President Obama

Mediaite, by Jon Nicosia

Original Article

Posted By:Fiesta del sol, 2/24/2013 7:15:53 PM

Ever since then-Senator Barack Obama first took a lead in the 2008 Democratic primary, the political news media has faced the accusation that they are “in the tank” for the now-second term President Obama. On Sunday morning’s Reliable Sources, the press got a qualified defense from a surprising source: Mitt Romney chief strategist Stuart Stevens. Host Howard Kurtz asked Stevens if ” much of the media is in the tank for Barack Obama,” to which Stevens replied, “In the tank? I would say no.”

Comments:
How could we have won if Romney´s top guy didn´t know what he was up against? SMH

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: nina584, 2/24/2013 7:21:43 PM     (No. 9194065)

Stupid Republican establishment!!!!


Reply 2 - Posted by: john56, 2/24/2013 7:22:32 PM     (No. 9194066)

And I´m the King of Sheba!

Call the folks in the white coats. There´s a looney named Stuart Stevens running loose!


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Blue-Z-Anna, 2/24/2013 7:25:09 PM     (No. 9194069)

Ya, that´s a stupid remark but like most of the Romney effort it´s faults were attributable, in large part, to Mitt and his people being nice people who play fair and don´t make claims they can´t prove or charges that are not helpful.

It´s a maturity thing and a class thing.

Barky´s peeps never heard of such a thing.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Lalo, 2/24/2013 7:27:30 PM     (No. 9194070)

What a pitiful reflection of how out of touch with reality the candidate himself must have been, if this was top strategist... !


Reply 5 - Posted by: Lalo, 2/24/2013 7:28:16 PM     (No. 9194071)

..´his´ top strategist, that is..


Reply 6 - Posted by: dipi, 2/24/2013 7:31:18 PM     (No. 9194075)

Surely you jest!


Reply 7 - Posted by: Sunhan65, 2/24/2013 7:32:57 PM     (No. 9194079)

Earlier today I posted about delusional incompetence within the Romney Campaign. Meet a delusional incompetent.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: scottc, 2/24/2013 7:33:13 PM     (No. 9194080)

Romney´s loss is becoming more and more evident as to why it happened. Wow are the GOP establishment out to lunch.


Reply 9 - Posted by: ASAvet, 2/24/2013 7:43:14 PM     (No. 9194089)

This clown needs to go back to Utah and tend his sheep.


Reply 10 - Posted by: annie xango, 2/24/2013 7:44:53 PM     (No. 9194090)

Well, I guess that says it all!! Can someone please , please tell me how these ninnies are considered "tops" in their fields??WTH!!!!!How did they get there??? Next time hire an LDotter ..we will do it for FREE!! and we won´t have that outcome...


Reply 11 - Posted by: jackie, 2/24/2013 7:47:21 PM     (No. 9194093)

with staff like this..I have to wonder..did Romney really want to win? Were we had? Romney is not a stupid man so why surround yourself with fools like this...


Reply 12 - Posted by: alliecat, 2/24/2013 7:49:25 PM     (No. 9194096)

Now I know why we lost. Unbelievable. We need a savvy media shark, dang it, not some East Coast social wanna be.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: srhcb, 2/24/2013 7:49:31 PM     (No. 9194097)

The old word for a person like Stevens is "ninny".


Reply 14 - Posted by: STLstudent, 2/24/2013 7:54:34 PM     (No. 9194101)

The strategist is looking for a job with the Democrats. It is not complex.


Reply 15 - Posted by: eoddad, 2/24/2013 7:58:49 PM     (No. 9194105)

MUST be trying to get a job at MSNBC. Move over Scarborough you have competition.


Reply 16 - Posted by: Boneshaker, 2/24/2013 8:04:42 PM     (No. 9194111)

helps understand why we saw such a limp-wristed campaign - doesn´t it?


Reply 17 - Posted by: LudicrousSextus, 2/24/2013 8:11:34 PM     (No. 9194116)

The phrase ´in the tank´ doesn´t actually describe the MSM towards Obama...

´Stole the damn car for him´ would be more appropriate.

The behavior of ´news media´ since the ´affirmative action black president´ took charge has been nothing short of reprehensible.

They have absolutely abandoned any ´objectivity in the public interest´ for this buffoon.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Alpha91c, 2/24/2013 8:23:26 PM     (No. 9194124)

Beside rapant voter fraud, Mr. Stevens explains in large part why Romney lost. If Romney surrounded himself with people like that maybe it is just a well that he lost. He would not have been much of an improvement on Dear Leader.


Reply 19 - Posted by: TXknitter, 2/24/2013 8:23:30 PM     (No. 9194125)

This kind of media naïveté or really, just being too dang scared to tell the TRUTH is what lost the election. I know, besides voter fraud, I know. Yes, Mitt plays fair and Dems and MSM do not. Well, RR was up against the same and he outmaneuvered them and boxed their ears. This is why Mitt should stay in business and out of politics. Fiercely honest, boldly patriotic and smart as a whip with the media is what kind of leader America must have now.


Reply 20 - Posted by: F16 guy, 2/24/2013 8:25:09 PM     (No. 9194126)


This is a blessed reminder of why I changed my voter registration from Republican after this last election.

The party is a joke.


Reply 21 - Posted by: Pros7767, 2/24/2013 8:28:51 PM     (No. 9194132)

Won´t read the article. The election results are self explanatory. I am truly disgusted. They sacrificed this country because of their idiocy.


Reply 22 - Posted by: coldoc, 2/24/2013 8:32:26 PM     (No. 9194136)

Shows why giving a republican money is a waste. This guy is on something and its seriously affecting his brain cells. Loser.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: altoona, 2/24/2013 8:33:33 PM     (No. 9194138)

Soros plant, Stuart Stevens, today said the media was not in the tank for Obama.


Reply 24 - Posted by: zahbudda, 2/24/2013 8:49:48 PM     (No. 9194151)

Idiot! An imbecile! Another elitist without a clue!


Reply 25 - Posted by: Downtowngal, 2/24/2013 8:52:33 PM     (No. 9194153)

Watching him on CNN this morning was more than I could stomach. For me, the mystery of Romney´s loss was solved. I wanted to bash in my TV set. Exactly who was responsible for this fool?


Reply 26 - Posted by: Polecat49, 2/24/2013 9:00:59 PM     (No. 9194161)

If we keep letting blithering idiots like this run repulican campaigns, the democRAT dynasty will last forever. I didn´t really like romney, AND, now I know he DID NOT want to win.


Reply 27 - Posted by: tisHimself, 2/24/2013 9:03:33 PM     (No. 9194162)

And yet, no word herein from Palin hatin, Rove loving there is no establishment and the t party doesn´t exist severe conservatives.

Own it.


Reply 28 - Posted by: 4Justice, 2/24/2013 9:37:23 PM     (No. 9194180)

Are people seriously leaving the Republican Party over stuff like this???


Reply 29 - Posted by: CleanhouseinDc, 2/24/2013 9:45:18 PM     (No. 9194186)

And to think how badly some of us were flamed for pointing out the obvious. No more holding my nose.


Reply 30 - Posted by: smcchk, 2/24/2013 9:51:00 PM     (No. 9194193)

What newspapers/news broadcasts was this fellow reading and listening to? I give up.


Reply 31 - Posted by: enuf8, 2/24/2013 9:53:37 PM     (No. 9194198)

The reporting of one of Romney´s sons stated his father was not that enthused about winning---now this. Yep, I believe them. Played dirty against his peers during the primary didn´t he?


Reply 32 - Posted by: dman, 2/24/2013 10:02:54 PM     (No. 9194207)

No surprise - what we suspected. These RINOs are part of the problem.

BTW: Where is Mr. Romney these days? The nation is at the precipice, and he´s hidden away on the Marriott board. Not a "peep" from him.


Reply 33 - Posted by: SheikYerBooty, 2/24/2013 10:07:08 PM     (No. 9194210)

I tried to warn everybody that Mitt was going to fold up like a cheap lawn chair and was routinely chastised by the Karl Rove sycophantic suck-ups.


Reply 34 - Posted by: cincinnati whig, 2/24/2013 10:15:02 PM     (No. 9194221)

I don´t get how some alleged conservatives seem to think the way to deal with people like this in the Republican Party is to withdraw and retreat. Romney´s nomination wasn´t as easy as McCain´s, because in 2012 almost all conservative candidates dropped out faster than in 2008 when it was obvious they had no chance of winning and were just handing the RINO candidate a string of plurality victories by dispersing conservative votes. Almost all... it´s Newt Gingrich you can thank for the GOP nomination going to Romney rather than Santorum.


Reply 35 - Posted by: DaBigGuy, 2/24/2013 10:15:42 PM     (No. 9194222)

Maybe Katie Couric should ask Stevens exactly what he reads. Or watches. Or both.

This is beyond pathetic, a case of, "We think we have met the enemy, but we´re not sure because we wouldn´t recognize it if we tripped over it."

But this is merely a reflection of elite attitude and stupidity. Given the amount of voter fraud, even hiring someone competent in that position wouldn´t have affected the outcome.


Reply 36 - Posted by: janylou, 2/24/2013 10:28:23 PM     (No. 9194234)

Can he say that with a straight face while confronting Candy and her great intervention.


Reply 37 - Posted by: TrueBlueWfan, 2/24/2013 10:29:33 PM     (No. 9194236)

Maybe Stuart Stevens should re-watch the 2nd debate when the ever-impartial Candy Crowley was a human shield for our poseur.

Come on, it is bad enough we have to fight these lying socialists every single darned day of our lives, now even people supposedly on our side don´t even know who they are up against. This guy will probably still be a consultant on the next GOP campaign too, because it is the same people doing the same darned things that lose us elections.


Reply 38 - Posted by: a man over thirty, 2/24/2013 10:36:48 PM     (No. 9194244)

They share Obama´s agenda. They worship Obama. He is the One they were waiting for.

But they´re not ´in the tank´ for Obama.

This guy was a ´top Romney strategist´?
No wonder Mitt lost.

Idiot.


Reply 39 - Posted by: gabula, 2/24/2013 10:51:44 PM     (No. 9194255)

Mitt sure as heck could fight with his party and gave up in the real fight. He was just like McCain and all of his people... can´t attack Obama.....

I can´t recall all the names now, but Schmit and Nicole Wallace come to mind now.. and LURKING somewhere I hear KARL ROVE...

He and Ann on FOX next week. No thanks, at CPAC, won´t bother, have something else to do when he speaks.....

Gabula


Reply 40 - Posted by: kahunavol, 2/24/2013 11:15:44 PM     (No. 9194266)

The R party is nothing but a joke. Why anyone gives money is a mystery except for the old truism about a fool and his/her money.


Reply 41 - Posted by: chicodon, 2/24/2013 11:52:11 PM     (No. 9194295)

OK, there you have it.


Reply 42 - Posted by: floridagator, 2/24/2013 11:55:26 PM     (No. 9194298)

Not just the Republican Party, #28, but Republican blogs as well. It´s over.


Reply 43 - Posted by: PChristopher, 2/25/2013 1:54:43 AM     (No. 9194373)

Then this guy should never have been in his position.


Reply 44 - Posted by: killerbee, 2/25/2013 2:39:46 AM     (No. 9194398)

Pure self-promotion from this guy. He will throw the entire campaign staff under the bus in his attempt to secure some of that Steve Schmidt blood money.

If this guy truly thinks the media is not in the tank for Obama then he has no business being involved in politics at all. He is a pure incompetent. There were a few of those on the Romney campaign, and no doubt this is just the beginning of them coming out of the woodwork.


Reply 45 - Posted by: flatwater, 2/25/2013 2:57:05 AM     (No. 9194404)

The entire establishment GOP has imbeciles like this advising them.

Keep sending up TEA Party candidates like Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz. Either we get rid of imbeciles like this from the inside out, or we´re forced to go third party.


Reply 46 - Posted by: Spidey, 2/25/2013 3:41:41 AM     (No. 9194413)

The media has always been in the tank for a dem candidate and we´ve won in spite of that. Romney´s problem was he didn´t give people a compelling reason to vote for him and his religion had a lot to do with stay at home voters,especially hardcore evangelicals.

Romney was also a poor choice to run against Obamacare when his own plan was he basis for it.Employer based healthcare with gov´t subsidies isn´t a bad idea and it´s an incentive to work. As soon as they included the "can´t afford it" crowd it was doomed.Freeloaders will dig a 3000 mile tunnel to get to a government giveaway like that.They should have just put the lofos on medicaid,instead of disrupting the mainstream insurance companies.

The main reason Obamacare won´t work is there´s too many carve outs for dem supporters.The risk pool isn´t being spread around enough.


Reply 47 - Posted by: philsner, 2/25/2013 6:45:54 AM     (No. 9194473)

But we all need to rally around Rove and erect a big tent.
So many posters on this site keep telling us that.

No, we don´t need someone like Palin, we need people like Rove and Romney to woo the independents.

Barf me with a spoon.


Reply 48 - Posted by: JimS, 2/25/2013 6:47:53 AM     (No. 9194477)

The stupidity of that statement takes my breath away.
Can Stuart (Little) Stevens really be that stupid and disconnected?
Or is he just looking for Leftmedia acclaim and a fat job offer?


Reply 49 - Posted by: BarryNo, 2/25/2013 7:14:44 AM     (No. 9194507)

This donkey in pachyderm drag brays, "Nope! No asses here! Trust me! Heee HAAAAAWWW!"


Reply 50 - Posted by: dolphin, 2/25/2013 9:07:31 AM     (No. 9194679)

Romney had a strategist? Gee. That IS news.


Reply 51 - Posted by: chicodon, 2/25/2013 9:15:19 AM     (No. 9194694)

The immortal line from Ed Wood´s Plan 9 from Outer Space... "Earth people are stupid, stupid, stupid." Actually I think they were talking about this guy.


Reply 52 - Posted by: MisterDickens, 2/25/2013 9:18:32 AM     (No. 9194698)

Just one or two more of these Establishement Republican straws get piled on me and I´m gone.

I have a new name for the Republican Establishment, the Pubtanic, led by Captain Karl Rove.

Conservatives: "Look! Up ahead, Karl. It´s an iceberg!!"

Karl: "Don´t bother me! I´m busy throwing Sharon Angle off the ship."


Reply 53 - Posted by: mickturn, 2/25/2013 9:22:06 AM     (No. 9194703)

...and one of the key reasons Romney lost (not counting the massive voter fraud).


Reply 54 - Posted by: KarenJ1, 2/25/2013 9:45:25 AM     (No. 9194752)

I truly don´t know whether to laugh or cry. This is just astonishing! Meanwhile, 0bama and the regime are blanketing this country with their new campaign PAC to further destroy us. It´s extremely disheartening that we have people are our side who are really this naive and stupid. Stevens was a former travel writer?? and worked for Dole and McCain. Where do we find these morons??We were dead in the water before it even began. If we continue to have incompetent idiots like this running campaigns against the Democrat behemoth machine we are doomed forever. It´s just breathtaking and very depressing.


Reply 55 - Posted by: PoliticalJunky, 2/25/2013 9:48:02 AM     (No. 9194763)

11, Romney wanted to win badly enough so that he spent 15 million dollars of his own moneyh when he tried to get the nomination the first time. He was vilified by our side for "trying to buy the presidency" as though it was more noble to spend money raised than to spend one´s own money. I never figured that one out.

31, Romney was not enthusiastic about trying again but after being talked into it he was, of course, anxious to win. Why else would he demean himself and inconvenience himself with all those stupid debates with other Republicans, some of whom were spoilers because they couldn´t accept that there was no path to securing the nomination open to them but their egos just would not permit them to give up. He finally had to get tough with Gingrich, which many did not like to see, but Gingrich was not on the ballot at all in VA and not on the ballots of some counties in other states. Couldn´t he count? Couoldn´t his followers count? When you can´t win get out of the way.


Reply 56 - Posted by: mathman, 2/25/2013 9:48:37 AM     (No. 9194767)

With friends like this, pubbies do not need enemies.
Who hired this twit?
Strategy: lose.
Top strategist: lose big.
In the tank: mind-numbed robots.
What journalism has been practiced by the Lame-Stream Media about Obama´s promises? None.
What journalism has penetrated the veil of secrecy surrounding the lack of origin, education, or past history of Won? None.
It is truly Won and Done.
Stuart Stevens should be paid by the Dems. He is doing their work for free.


Reply 57 - Posted by: blizzard, 2/25/2013 9:50:47 AM     (No. 9194775)

I´m done with the GOP until the RINOs are gone.


Reply 58 - Posted by: BorninOKC, 2/25/2013 10:00:38 AM     (No. 9194792)

For some years now there has been another person like this jsut when i start to think I have seen the dumbest Pubbie spokesman.


Reply 59 - Posted by: KanCreeper, 2/25/2013 10:05:28 AM     (No. 9194801)

Stuart Stevens is a moron. The only reason for his making that statement quoted in he headline is his need to find a job. Let him go back to the Democ´RAT Party.

If this guy is a strategist...Moby Dick was an ET!


Reply 60 - Posted by: K.I.S.S., 2/25/2013 10:08:42 AM     (No. 9194813)

PAY ATTENTION CONSERVATIVES!! NEVER...EVER USE A "REPUBLICAN" PROFESSIONAL ANYTHING!!


Reply 61 - Posted by: Grandpa Bill, 2/25/2013 10:19:35 AM     (No. 9194835)

Extraordinary posts on this thread, especially #8´s pithy comment which hit the proverbial nail on the head.


Reply 62 - Posted by: Ivehadit, 2/25/2013 10:22:13 AM     (No. 9194838)

Stuart Stevens is a soggy cucumber sandwich to use one of Hillbuzz´s terms. Call it what you like(maturity, class). I call it grandiosity.

I want Dr. Carson! The country needs him. HE IS NOT AFRAID. His time has come. And you know what?
He doesn´t NEED a Stuart Stevens.


Reply 63 - Posted by: Really?, 2/25/2013 10:22:52 AM     (No. 9194840)

What credibility does the Chief Strategist of a guy who LOST to the worst President in History have anyway ?

Surprised he got any airtime.


Reply 64 - Posted by: RancherJack, 2/25/2013 10:24:18 AM     (No. 9194844)

" ....!"


Reply 65 - Posted by: judy, 2/25/2013 10:24:40 AM     (No. 9194845)

I suggest the repubs go out in the real world & recruit a strategist...DC is way out of touch ...Romney should have included the tea party & Ron Paul ... in other words he should have ignored Rove...


Reply 66 - Posted by: hoopsfan, 2/25/2013 10:28:16 AM     (No. 9194851)

It´s like saying Pravda wasn´t in the tank for the Communist Party.

Utter ignorance.



Reply 67 - Posted by: steveW, 2/25/2013 10:49:25 AM     (No. 9194883)

Romney chose to hire a strategist who didn´t understand the enemy. No wonder Obama won.


Reply 68 - Posted by: belle65355, 2/25/2013 10:50:19 AM     (No. 9194884)

@ #57...if everybody was "done with the GOP until the rinos are gone, " well the tell me who would be left to vote them out? i don´t like what happened any more than anyone else, but we have 2 parties unless you count independents. maybe the "tea party" should become a ligitimate party doncha think? THEN maybe something could get done. in case no one knows it the tea part by and large are constitutionalists.


Reply 69 - Posted by: belle65355, 2/25/2013 11:00:14 AM     (No. 9194896)

sorry for the typos


Reply 70 - Posted by: bighambone, 2/25/2013 11:03:07 AM     (No. 9194908)

It´s pretty clear why Romney lost. The height of rich weak Republican establishment naivety was running against tough street smart liberal Democrat Chicago politicians. It was no contest from the get-go, as the Obama crew had Romney pictured in the minds of their prospective voters as "a rich someone who did not care about them" before Romney ever got off his beach chair behind his mansion at the lake in New Hampshire.


Reply 71 - Posted by: redink, 2/25/2013 11:42:17 AM     (No. 9195004)

Romney´s CHIEF strategist.
And the rinos are still trying to bring Mitt back to life.
*heavy sigh*

Gingrich-bashers wake up. Newt was the only one of the candidates who took the fight to the media and Obama...the real enemies.

Can we learn from this?
The Tea Party is not the problem. Conservative principles are not the problem.
Even the dem machine is not the problem.
The problem is Stuart Stevens and everyone who thinks like him.
That includes the Epic Rino Romney.


Reply 72 - Posted by: berlin, 2/25/2013 11:43:02 AM     (No. 9195009)

I wonder what this guy is smoking.


Reply 73 - Posted by: belwhatter, 2/25/2013 12:04:54 PM     (No. 9195088)

#28 I think the rest of the comments on this thread provide a forceful answer to your question. The Republican party is dead for obvious reasons but some of them won´t lie down - yet. The time has come for new leaders, new ideas and some honesty in support of the Constitution and yes, I like Dr. Ben and am a diehard Palin supporter.


Reply 74 - Posted by: EQKimball, 2/25/2013 12:06:59 PM     (No. 9195093)

The coach of the losing team, if he has any class, never blames the officials, the fans or the media, no matter how well deserved. Others will do it for him. That is our job.


Reply 75 - Posted by: WIBadger, 2/25/2013 12:13:14 PM     (No. 9195114)

An Obama mole....?


Reply 76 - Posted by: VAfreedomluver, 2/25/2013 12:28:43 PM     (No. 9195154)

It´s worth noting that Reagan´s election team was heavy on his California loyalists and short on Beltway establishment types. This is the way it has to be done by Republicans if they want to win.

Romney took the lead for awhile in October by getting aggressive in the first debate and going after both Obama and the media. When he went back to playing nice and playing defense, Obama regained the momentum and never looked back. It sounds like this Stuart Stevens fellow (never heard of him before this) was one of the "play nice" types.

Politics ain´t beanbag.


Reply 77 - Posted by: golfer1, 2/25/2013 12:52:04 PM     (No. 9195202)

And then they wonder why they lost...


Reply 78 - Posted by: Hobbiest, 2/25/2013 1:00:48 PM     (No. 9195224)

Mitt was stupid to rely as much as he did on the advice of the DC based Republican consultancy. Perhaps he assumed they were of the same professional caliber as Boston Consultants. They aren´t. Indeed, they have been handing out bad political advice for most of my lifetime. As another poster noted, Reagan began to win in 1980 after he fired the DC based advisers. Someone over at Redstate looked at how incestuous Mitt´s crew was, how much cash they raked in and how most of their 2012 efforts went to settling old political scores instead of trying to actually win the election.


Reply 79 - Posted by: Grambo, 2/25/2013 1:01:05 PM     (No. 9195227)

The statement will do exactly what he intended it to, get him on the liberal DC cocktail circuit.


Reply 80 - Posted by: Quiet Observer, 2/25/2013 1:45:11 PM     (No. 9195325)

Maybe he couldn´t see the media because he´s not a doctor. After all, most of the MSM are so far up Obama´s backside that the only way to see them is with a colonoscope.


Reply 81 - Posted by: King of all trolls, 2/25/2013 1:58:51 PM     (No. 9195354)

What a buffoon. Why is "republican strategist" an oxymoron?


Reply 82 - Posted by: flatwater, 2/25/2013 2:12:32 PM     (No. 9195379)

Every single person on this board would have given better political advice....


Reply 83 - Posted by: Billyc, 2/25/2013 2:25:24 PM     (No. 9195417)

Stevens is off his rocker. This anchor weight together with a lot of Conservatves lack of help in electing Romney.Gingrich was paricularily offensive towards Mitt Romney. Even Rush Limbaugh was luke warm.As a MA Conservative I consider the Governor was the man for the job,an eloquent speaker and he knew his facts, especially the economy. In the debates Governor Romney brought this cowering idiot down to size.We are left with an empty space in the White House. I will never forget Obamas cowardice and his lieing in not giving a direct command down the line to help the 4 men fighting for their lives at the Benghazi Consulate. How an earth can this enept, incompetant occupant of the White House be still issuing orders. Does not make sense.


Reply 84 - Posted by: redwhite&blue2, 2/25/2013 2:26:01 PM     (No. 9195421)

Somewhere out there is the perfect Conservative candidate who could whip Obama´s ass....but this person has obviously not been discovered by us yet...sigh.....

And to think I wasted my valuable vote on McPain and then Romney. The right candidate would have smothered Barry Soetoro. Combine that candidate incompetence with the DemocRAT machine voting fraud and its no wonder that even King Hussein was so surprised that he won re-election. I cant help feeling so screwed. How about you?

If we dont learn to start FIGHTING them, fighting back, and fighting hard, we will continue to be screwed, and I dont appreciate feeling screwed, do you?

Mister or Mrs. Stuart whoever the hell you are Stevens, YOU ARE THE WEAKEST LINK! Get outta here! Dumbass!


Reply 85 - Posted by: Timber Queen, 2/25/2013 2:39:29 PM     (No. 9195460)

The Republican establishment are not naive, stupid, or too nice. They are complicit in the socialist transformation of America.

It is said that our only hope is to work inside the party to bring up more constitutional conservatives like Ted Cruz and Rand Paul. However, we don´t have the time to do that.

I´m sick and tired of fighting the socialists, both outside and inside the GOP. I am afraid of my government. If they don´t want to abide by the Constitution, then I don´t have to follow their edicts.

What difference, at this point, does it make? Who is John Galt? I am John Galt.


Reply 86 - Posted by: kctiger, 2/25/2013 2:41:37 PM     (No. 9195472)

A top stratagist says...

Explains a lot doesn´t it folks!!


Reply 87 - Posted by: grandpa, 2/25/2013 6:01:06 PM     (No. 9195906)

A top strategist on the Democrats side killed Romney´s chances by constantly playing a video of him saying he would overturn Roe v Wade and abolish Planned Parenthood. That alone killed the women´s vote and assured Romney´s defeat. And if Republicans don´t get off the abortion issue, they will lose again and again. Are you listening, top Republican strategists?


Reply 88 - Posted by: kahunavol, 2/25/2013 6:24:22 PM     (No. 9195943)

I always appreciate the non sequitur posts.


Reply 89 - Posted by: cat2, 2/25/2013 6:34:16 PM     (No. 9195954)

Romney wasted our time and he wasted our money. He assembled the dumbest campaign staff ever. Romney gets what Romney wants -- he is not stupid -- and apparently he did not want the presidency.


Reply 90 - Posted by: lana720, 2/25/2013 7:01:37 PM     (No. 9195980)

With friends like this....
I believe Romney lost the first time he said zippy was a nice man with a good family or words to that effect. He NEVER should have repeated it. He never called him out on his horrible record.
OMG, how do we survive four more years of this?


Reply 91 - Posted by: Janjan, 2/25/2013 8:41:47 PM     (No. 9196093)

Obama and the media smell blood in the water and they are out to destroy the Republican Party. Romney was easy pickings and the judgement of his ´strategist´ proves it. They need to stop murmuring about Obama´s good intentions (he doesn´t have any) and acknowledge the fact that Obama´s policies are destroying us while he smilingly and successfully blames them all on Congressional Republicans. Why we can see this and they can´t or won´t is the mystery of our generation.


Reply 92 - Posted by: tonyl, 2/25/2013 8:46:34 PM     (No. 9196100)

Mitt should have had nothing to lose playing nice. In a normal America, Obama would have lost to Bozo the clown. But it´s not the America I grew up in anymore. Republicans who didn´t get their way stayed home in droves on Mitt. If I didn´t know any better I´d say Gingrich and Santorum were democrat operatives in the primaries. 59 voter precincts in Philly and not one vote for mitt? A mathematical and statistical impossibility. Yeah...he stood a chance. His handlers stunk but you can´t blame it all on them.


Reply 93 - Posted by: globalwarmer, 2/25/2013 9:25:42 PM     (No. 9196143)

This is a big reason why I hang up on the RNC stooges every time they call wanting money.


Reply 94 - Posted by: pineledger, 2/26/2013 5:04:05 AM     (No. 9196426)

Dumb doesn´t win.


Reply 95 - Posted by: kahunavol, 2/26/2013 8:14:03 AM     (No. 9196630)

So, how to reconcile staying home in droves with the fact that Mitt got more votes than McCain. Republican memes are as silly as Democrats.



Post Reply   Close thread 724751




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Fiesta del sol"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Fiesta del sol"



Past presidents have
sent IRS after critics
Associated Press, by Tom Raum    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 5/17/2013 11:14:02 AM     Post Reply
The Internal Revenue Service controversy dogging President Barack Obama is hardly the first time a White House and the tax agency have been accused of political meddling and bias. Over the past week, Republicans have been trying to link Obama to what the IRS has acknowledged was improper extra scrutiny of conservative political groups seeking tax-exempt status. That’s despite the fact that little — if anything — has surfaced to suggest White House officials had advance knowledge of the IRS actions. The line between IRS misconduct and the Oval Office appears less fuzzy in IRS political incidents in previous administrations.

Ad on Rush Limbaugh
featuring Belk
creates online stir
Charlotte Observer, by Ely Portillo    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 5/16/2013 12:38:35 PM     Post Reply
Charlotte-based Belk Inc. found itself in the middle of an online battle between political partisans this week, when an ad featuring the company ran on conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh’s radio program. The fight highlights the fine line companies walk with advertising and social media. The ad featuring Belk was apparently first noticed Monday by a group on Facebook that monitors Rush Limbaugh’s advertisers in an effort to pressure the talk show host financially. On Tuesday, the liberal website Daily Kos mentioned the ad in a posting. People started posting messages on Belk’s Facebook page protesting the ad.

W.H. Holds off-the-
record Benghazi briefing
Politico, by Dylan Byers    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 5/10/2013 2:31:40 PM     Post Reply
The White House held an off-the-record briefing with reporters on Friday afternoon to discuss recent revelations about the Benghazi investigation, sources familiar with the meeting tell POLITICO. The meeting began around 12:45 p.m. and postponed the daily, on-the-record White House press briefing to 1:45 p.m. White House press secretary Jay Carney did not respond to a request for confirmation of the meeting. The off-the-record session was announced to reporters in the wake of an ABC News report showing that White House and State Dept. officials were involved in revising the now-discredited CIA talking points about the attack on Benghazi.

Obama orders top aides
to praise Obamacare
during commencement speeches
Washington Examiner, by Joel Gehrke    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 5/9/2013 4:20:38 PM     Post Reply
President Obama has ordered his Cabinet officials to praise Obamacare when giving speeches at college commencement ceremonies, even as the president’s aides fear that poor implementation of the law will tarnish his legacy. “To counter the criticism, the White House has told all Cabinet members and senior officials to use commencement speeches to drive home for graduating college students and their parents the benefits they gain from a provision of the law that allows young adults to stay on their family’s insurance plans until they turn 26,” Bloomberg reports. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., did her part to tout

John McCain Wants to
Blow Up The Cable Industry
As We Know It
Business Insider, by Jay Yarow    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 5/9/2013 1:19:00 PM     Post Reply
John McCain is going to release a bill that would dismantle cable as it´s currently constructed, Brenden Sasso at The Hill reports. The legislation would force cable companies and satellite TV providers to give consumers an option to pick and choose which channels they get. This is called "à la carte programming," and it´s long been a dream of consumers who only want a handful of channels. McCain tried to introduce similar legislation in 2006 and it went nowhere.

Benghazi: Incompetence,
but no cover-up
National Journal, by Michael Hirsh    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 5/8/2013 6:04:54 PM     Post Reply
There was tragic incompetence, plainly, in the Obama administration’s handling of the Benghazi attacks, and even possibly some political calculation. It is a record that may well come to haunt Hillary Clinton, the first Secretary of State to lose an ambassador in the field in more than three decades, if she runs for president in 2016. But the obvious Republican effort to turn this inquiry into the Democratic (Obama) version of the Iraq intelligence scandal that has tarred the GOP since the George W. Bush years -- led by that least-credible of champions, the almost-always-wrong Darrell Issa --

Benghazi Again
Time Magazine, by Joe Klein    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 5/8/2013 11:21:13 AM     Post Reply
The Republicans, apparently with nothing better to do, are still chasing their tails over the tragic events in Benghazi on September 11.Actually, no. That’s not true. They’re chasing their tails over what happened after the tragic events of September 11. They’re mostly concerned that the Obama Administration tried to cover up the fact that this was a terrorist attack by a local militia (translation: local street gang) which aspired toward bad-butt Al Qaeda status. This is a pretty hard sell since, the day after the attack, the President called it an “act of terror.”



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Officials on Benghazi:
"We made mistakes,
but without malice"

52 replie(s)
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM     Post Reply
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.

Raindrops wash away
reeling O’s fake veneer

46 replie(s)
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM     Post Reply
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons

Watergate 2.0 -- why the
IRS scandal is far worse

44 replie(s)
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM     Post Reply
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,

Obama a new Nixon?
Oh, get serious.

43 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/16/2013 10:54:51 PM     Post Reply
STANDING BEFORE reporters Thursday, President Obama declined an invitation to compare the recent scandals weighing down his administration with those that forced President Nixon to resign in 1974. So allow us to do the work for him: There is no comparison. Nixon, in a series of crimes that collectively came to be known as Watergate, directed from the White House and Justice Department a concerted campaign against those he perceived as political enemies, in the process subverting the FBI, the IRS, other government agencies and the electoral process to his nefarious purposes. Mr. Obama has done nothing of the kind.

Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting
Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.

41 replie(s)
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM     Post Reply
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,

Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
41 replie(s)
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM     Post Reply
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part

Rep. Issa subpoenas Benghazi
auditor Thomas Pickering

37 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington DC], by Julian Pecquet    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/17/2013 3:53:45 PM     Post Reply
The lawmaker leading the charge to investigate the Benghazi terror attack on Friday subpoenaed the co-author of a report that slammed the State Department but didn´t interview Hillary Clinton. House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) formally demanded that retired ambassador Thomas Pickering submit to being deposed by the committee next Thursday. The subpoena comes in the wake of a series of acrimonious public exchanges this week between the two men. Issa didn´t issue a subpoena to former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Michael Mullen, who co-authored the Benghazi report with Pickering.


Post Reply   Close thread 724751





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~