Too bad. She has worn much better hair styles than this one.

OK. The bangs make her nose look wider and blobbier and her face doughier. She can no longer let a sweep of hair cover that her "Little (right) Eye". And she generally looks older and more common. If that is possible.

And she´s now stuck with all those bange wigs of different lengths. Just when the closet floor was so cluttered...

"I´m their savior, that´s what they call me, so Lauren Bacall me, from my head to my toes..."

Those "sensible" sleeves the writer noticed cover those menopausal (former) guns. Not so toned any more, they often show the batwing-iness that comes with age.

Oozing toward the big Five-O.

When are the Han, Luke and Princess Leia portraits coming out? I´d like to collect the whole set

It´s like somebody painted a smiley face on a cape buffalo

Diana Ross meets Blackie O . . sorry, it just ain´t working fer me.

Her hands are enormous. Almost looks like it´s in 3D, the way they leap out at you.

She looks like helmet head. She can appear quite pretty with the right cut, this isn´t it. She should try off the shoulders out of the face and add some curls.

I´m told that Jerry Springer has a recurring theme show where black tranny hookers come on, wearing the same kind of wig Michelle has chosen to wear. And she is built like many of those Jerry Springer tranny guests.
geez.

I usually think she looks like a scary linebacker about to eat everyone in her path.
But this picture isn´t that bad.
I still despise her and her husband for lying and cheating and destroying America.

I don´t need to "feel good" about this woman being in the White House because ... I never owned slaves.

Aside from voters "feel good" status, she offers only negatives. And her room-mate is the new version of a Muslim terrorist.

Umm..she does have sleeves which cover her arms. Is the dress well below the ´water line" or more ´mini´?

Please Lord, Please, do not let anyone post that picture where I might see it. Thank you, Lord.

She definitely looks better with sleeves. She doesn´t look as manly.

It is true, the bangs make her look younger, sexier and seductive.

FTA ... most prominent feature:her bangs. Her does!
And what is that scab on her lip?

The uglier she gets the more the press swoons about it.

#17, you´re joking right?

(The collection box for new glasses for #17 is over in the corner.)

Some outrageous folks opine that that new wig (and it is a wig, kids) covers cosmetic surgery scars.

And/or she has been spending too much time lately with Anna Wintour of Vogue - where she is said to be on the March cover. ??? Has anyone seen it in the supermarket and turned it over?

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/28/Anna_Wintour_2009_crop.jpg/220px-Anna_Wintour_2009_crop.jpg

Maybe it´s just me, but doesn´t this whole dog and pony show bother anyone else? I don´t care how flattering her bangs or sleeves are, or how the photgrapher did a reasonably good job given the subject. The country is going through the toughest economic times since the Great Depression; we are being invaded by foreign nationals who are taking our jobs, medical care, educational opportunities and promise to skew our elections; our national defense is being gutted; we no longer have a reasonable expectation of representation at the federal level; we have certifiably liars, loons and buffoons at our highest cabinet levels; we have a president who is either complicit or indifferent to our suffering and in the midst of all of this insanity, Michelle unveils her self-portrait after flying back from her annual, taxpayer funded, ski trip to Aspen and her husband´s taxpayer funded $1M plus three day golf weekend. I wish I could say that this is a Marie Antoinette level of disengagement and disinterest, but even poor Marie cared more. This is more like Nero.

Oops! No Vogue cover just yet. Wintour chose Beyonce.

That smarts.

She should be in La Cage aux Folles.

I guess that one won out over hanging 100 feet off the end of a construction crane swinging backwards into a four story brick building...

A new wig doesn´t change anything.

She´s still a racist, socialist moose.
.

I am curious as to how much the debacle repeat cost the American Taxpayer...another million tossed?

That woman is uglier than 40 miles of crooked highway!

#17 - what the heck? She is the most unattractive first lady since Eleanor Roosevelt.

Make that either her second most prominent feature, or at least her most prominent feature above the waist.

GVN

I barely noticed the Jane Fonda doo...its the Man Hands that really, really jump out at ya...

It´s not a bad portrait of Michelle. I still agree with Miss Lucianne that this hairdo is channeling Michelle´s inner Hanoi Jane from the 60´s. And I thought it was ´a strand of pearls´ not ´a set´.

A linebacker with bangs? Why not? We´ve got ´em with cornrows, dreadlocks, pigtails, afros and tattooed skulls. I guess bangs would be OK.

It´s not a hair-do, it´s a wig. She´s not that thin or proportioned like that . Photo-shopped? Phoney hair, phones picture, phones woman.

#10 commented: "She can appear quite pretty with the right cut, this isn´t it."

I agree. The right cut for Mooch would have the bangs going down to her chin. Maybe then I could tolerate looking at her.
Or not.

Smart move using a chair back to conceal her hips.

I don´t like the obvious wig, but the picture is much more tasteful than usual.

I still haven´t gotten over the barefoot peasant boob-belt outfits.

And she´s had a lot of work done.

Fashion forward = dresses like a skank.

I´m not religious, but even I know she´s covering up the 666.

Are we sure it´s not a "Planet of the Apes" poster?

I do not like this woman, not one bit. But this picture of her is good, as far as pictures go. If she would just dress and look this way when she is on official White House business, she would be MUCH less of an embarrassment. A quiet dress with no wide and high belt, pearls (not a chunky African necklace), a nice hair style and an actual smile on her face. Even her nails are toned down and nicely done, with no loud jewelry. This picture doesn´t make me cringe.

Dorian Obama

Amazing...On black velvet too! Must look great under blacklight.

Kate it ain´t.

I just love reading all the oozing up to Moo trash being written when the truth is that the woman is repulsive and a single look at her is enough to put any need to find a word beyond "ugly" to describe her. Whe really does her in is that she´s ugly from the inside out and it shows. I don´t care which sleaze designer she favors, they can hang anything on her and it won´tl change mean, nasty, cheap, and classless. In a woman like this pig, it´s inbred.

I´d rather read her answers to why she no longer has a law degree and about 50 more questions that were inspired after reading her Princeton thesis in which she makes it crystal clear that her hatred for "whitey" is real.

Man it´s a good thing that I ate a few hours ago. I am sick to death of people who fawn all over this ugly woman as if she were the next Jackie O. Say what you want about JKO but at least she was beautiful. The Wookie on the other hand is NOT a good looking woman. If beauty is in the eye of the beholder then I´m bllind as a bat and can´t hold up much.

I´d take a look at it but I don´t like snakes and I´d rather not turn to stone!!!

Ahh. look at that. a painting of Mooch´s favorite subject...HERSELF!