|
|
| |
Topic: A Not-So-Doomed GOP |
A Not-So-Doomed GOP
Tribune Media Services, by Jonah Goldberg
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Pluperfect, 2/1/2013 5:44:43 AM
|
| The Republicans are doomed. Conservatism is over. President Obama is conducting a mop-up operation at this point. That’s the basic consensus in places like New York City; Washington, D.C.; and other citadels of blue America. And let’s be fair, liberals have every reason to gloat — a little. The GOP has its troubles. Long-term demographic trends; often-irrational animosity from Hollywood, the media, and academia; a thumbless grasp of the culture on the part of many Republicans: All of these things create a headwind for the party and the broader conservative movement.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
olcap, 2/1/2013 6:02:06 AM (No. 9151808)
Thing is, the broader conservative movement is not part of the Republican Party. Not any longer.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Spidey, 2/1/2013 6:07:44 AM (No. 9151811)
Demographics is way overblown as a reason we´re losing and we´ll continue to lose if we buy into this crap. There´s no question that hispanics are inching their way up population wise but there´s more than enough white voters left to win elections.
There´s at least 10 million voters or more we´re not reaching or motivating to the polls. There´s a lot of voter apathy among white voters who don´t see a difference between the parties. If we got a substantial seperation of what republicans stand for,we could rally the troops. Instead establishment republicans think we need to blend in with the left to win.This is a huge mistake.
Liberals are motivated to the polls by financial rewards,we can´t offer that other than growing the economy to improve jobs. The problem there is people don´t care about jobs any more.
Obama has killed millions of jobs with more on the way putting more tax stress on the remaining workers. Every person who loses a tax paying job means we have to borrow more to replace that loss. That never occurs to Obama who only goal is to destroy his political enemies.
It wouldn´t be that hard to make the case Obama is insane.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
tulipwood, 2/1/2013 6:30:11 AM (No. 9151820)
The first GOP candidate to realize that its Ruling Class against Country Class and run with it, will win. The problem is that today´s GOP is too emeshed in the Ruling Class to be able to see the forest for the trees.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
dotty, 2/1/2013 6:49:04 AM (No. 9151836)
I hope the Republican Party dies. It birthed Progressivism with Teddy Roosevelt. It birthed the New World Order vie Bush the elder. It birthed the Patriot Act that destroyed the forth amendment under George Bush. It never fought the Federal Reserve, it defined patriotism as an absurd and genocidal call to war, it calls men like Orrin Hatch one of its own. Die Republican Party, you are evil.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Toledo, 2/1/2013 7:35:53 AM (No. 9151887)
It sounds like someone is on the wrong site.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
mindyourbubble, 2/1/2013 7:57:20 AM (No. 9151917)
I am a Conservative. I quit the Republican Party in 2005. My guess is that most of the so called republicans in congress are all RINOS. I saw the RNC as useless and wasted in their own egos. I keep getting these renew you membership envelopes with a request for $´s. I am tired of wasting my $´s on a group that drowns those who do not comply with their lousy planning, tactics, and still operating in the 18 century style of cigars and huff and puff. Why? In PA the RNC supported Specter instead of Santorum and Toomey in the primaries. Specter did a 180 and cast the winning vote in the senate for Obamacare. Instead of grooming candidates for POTUS over the last 4 years and cultivating voters in the blue states, the RNC sat on its backside and did little more than nod their heads asleep in the dens hidden in antiquity. It is time for a change in the RNC and a time to clean house in the RNC.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
StormCnter, 2/1/2013 8:20:38 AM (No. 9151961)
I am a conservative Republican, and I will remain a conservative Republican. I haven´t seen anything in any of the multitude of third/fourth/fifth and to infinity parties that suit me better. Those who dream of something else better get started on it because talk is easy, but forming a viable alternative party is a long, hard, expensive and rarely successful challenge. Why not use all that energy to begin today to fix whatever you believe is wrong inside the party we´ve got? Something more is required than just pointing fingers. If there are party figures you like and want to encourage, send money, letters, help them. All control isn´t in DC. There is lots of improvement to be made locally and in your state. Get started on it. Just look what we did in 2010. Let´s do it again in 2014. And, by the way, the national committees won´t be able to locate, encourage and succeed with new and good candidates if we don´t support them with donations. Stop lamenting our failures and begin thinking of successes in the future. No more whining, friends.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
tangles, 2/1/2013 8:38:44 AM (No. 9152008)
The Republican one issue voters that stayed home gave us Obama. How´s that working out for you?
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Judith, 2/1/2013 8:57:21 AM (No. 9152038)
For years I stuck with the republican party because I could not imagine ever voting for a dem. Since the republican´s have transformed themselves into very liberal dems, I can´t imagine ever voting again. The corrupt politicians have won and do not represent me or the country I remember. As for the nonsense about one issue voters? Don´t be ridiculous. The election was investigated and found that the conservatives voted for romney. One issue voters is an ignorant argument.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
dotty, 2/1/2013 8:57:36 AM (No. 9152039)
Maybe many of you aren´t aware of Agenda 21 or what the elder George Bush called the New World Order. However, if you live in water rich areas like the Catskill or the Ozarks you have seen NGO´s taking over land and water rights so that the corporations like AIG and Goldman can globally control water and land. Via "Scenic Byway, "Master" and "local "Comprehensive" plans, land use is being federalized an confiscated daily. I am stunned that anyone who has read The Constitution can see the Republican Party as anything but a tool of Global Corporate imprisonment - just like the Democratic Party. These guys eat drink and golf together, just like two divorce attorneys pretending they aren´t pals.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
nonsense, 2/1/2013 8:57:39 AM (No. 9152040)
Still waiting for the Demonrat party to run out of Other People´s Money. Until they do, they will continue to buy votes and send thank you notes to the Fed.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
comstock, 2/1/2013 9:36:45 AM (No. 9152127)
I´m coming around to the notion that the only way to defeat the Progressives and Liberals is to hit them where they live - in the gutter. They killed us over some stupid comments by a couple of obscure congressional candidates, go after Menendez the sleazebag.
Toss softballs at Hillary? What a bunch of schlubs. Panetta has now agreed to testify - go after him. Pin this administration on Bengazi. Tell the truth about the economy, Quit pandering to the Illegal Aliens - call them what they are and don´t let the opposition sign up 15 million new sheeple voters.
Get tough, get dirty. Get in MSNBC´s face. Call CNN´s bluff. Call them out for what they are - mouthpieces for the administration, the Unions, The leeches. Throw decorum out the window, they did a long time ago.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
EnsignO´Toole, 2/1/2013 9:48:59 AM (No. 9152161)
#7 is a very wise person and should be listened for many reasons. Many good, Conservative Republicans were elected in 2010 and 2012. They need a little time to get control of the party. It took a long time to evolve to RINO status, so to get back to Reagan status will take some patience. Little by little we are ridding ourselves of the RINOs. IMHO we need better PR people. Those who held the PR power in both the 2008 and 2012 Presidential elections cannot be allowed to handle our candidate in 2016 - we need fresh faces with strong conservative credentials.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
VAfreedomluver, 2/1/2013 11:54:52 AM (No. 9152502)
This is a very good column from Jonah. One of his best in a long time.
I would add that this "magic thinking" about the feds occurs because there is a disconnect between the federal government and the average voter, since that voter doesn´t interact with the feds in a meaningful way on a daily basis.
That same voter sees the tangible results of state and local governments every time they drive on local streets & roads, each day they send their kids to school, and every time they wait in line at the DMV to renew their driver´s license or car tags. So naturally they´re going to vote in a more aggressive way on these issues.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
hot coffee, 2/1/2013 12:54:07 PM (No. 9152612)
Very well written article. One addition point for the GOP (or actually, its voters)--please stop nominating the likes of Todd Akin, Richard Mourdock, and Christine O´Donnell.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Pluperfect"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Pluperfect"
|
|
Reactionaries in New York
|
|
Time, by Joe Klein
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/19/2013 8:27:40 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The Democratic candidates for mayor in New York are campaigning to win the support of the teachers union. They threaten to return the city to the horrors of the David Dinkins era. Back at the turn of the 1990s, New York City was a mess. Crime was rampant. The schools were dreadful. Children in foster care were brutalized because–as the head of the Child Welfare Agency said–”oversight is racist.” The mayor was an incompetent. And, above all, the city was run for the benefit of its employees rather than its citizens. What followed was 20 years of governance
|
| |
|
|
Immigration reform no sure bet
|
|
Politico, by Seung Min Kim & Jake Sherman
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/19/2013 6:29:04 AM
Post Reply
|
|
After years of false starts, Washington finally appears to be on the path to rewriting the nation’s immigration laws. The Senate Gang of Eight bill is holding its own in committee and is expected to hit the Senate floor in June. And in the House this week, members of a bipartisan group agreed “in principle” on a big bill to be revealed in June. But in this case, looks are deceiving. There are still major hurdles before immigration reform can reach President Barack Obama’s desk. The biggest one is the GOP-controlled House. Right now, the Senate bill has no chance
|
At Cincinnati IRS office, surprise over claims of partisan villainy
|
|
Washington Post, by Lisa Rein & Dan Zak
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/19/2013 5:17:34 AM
Post Reply
|
|
CINCINNATI — The fog of scandal hangs over a boxy, modernist, 10-story building that looks like a monument to paperwork. Shrubs and chain smokers flank its front entrance here on Main Street, in the heart of downtown. Every day, 2,000 employees go to work at various federal agencies in this John F. Kennedy-era structure, whose chief tenant is the Internal Revenue Service — which is having just about the worst week an agency can have. Up on the fourth floor — with its gray linoleum, low ceilings and fluorescent lights, file carts heaped with manila envelopes, its keypad-coded doors labeled 4-022
|
The Smoking Gun Can Tell the AP What a Federal Leak Investigation Is Like
|
|
Atlantic, by Philip Bump
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/18/2013 5:22:57 AM
Post Reply
|
|
When, in 2006, the website The Smoking Gun released a secret CIA memo documenting prisoner organizing strategies at Guantanamo Bay, the FBI took notice. Now the site has posted details of the ensuing 44-month-long investigation, offering a timely glimpse into the black box of a Department of Justice leak prosecution. And The Smoking Gun got lucky. Over the course of the FBI´s hunt, code-named "Stubborn Ways," 43 different people were interviewed, in locations stretching from New Mexico to Boston to Saudi Arabia. After the investigation narrowed to one person who was then exonerated — a woman from Virginia
|
There Was No Surge in IRS Tax-Exempt Applications in 2010
|
|
Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/18/2013 5:03:01 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A number of people have sought to explain the IRS targeting of Tea Party, patriot, and 9/12 group applications -- as well as those from other conservative groups -- for "specialist team" treatment (mainly delays and excessive and inappropriate questions) in 2010 by pointing to the Citizens United decision that year allowing for unlimited, undisclosed fundraising by such groups. That´s the explanation IRS official Lois Lerner gave a week ago when she first revealed that the agency had improperly handled a slew of applications -- the political shorthand was a mistaken attempt to deal with a surge in applications.
|
|
Obamacare and Chicago’s Unions
|
|
American Spectator, by Eileen Norcross
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/17/2013 6:13:58 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Much has been said about the trouble with public-sector pensions. Many state and local plans are underfunded and, unless policy and accounting changes are undertaken, some major plans will run out of assets to pay benefits over the coming years. That means these plans will have to operate on a pay-as-you-go-basis, forcing budgetary tradeoffs and tax hikes. Public-sector pensions often come with legal guarantees. For instance, Illinois and New York offer a constitutional guarantee of promised benefits. Many other states offer statutory protections. That’s why economists make the case that pension benefits
|
| |
|
|
The AP and the NRA
|
|
Politico, by Rich Lowry
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/17/2013 4:56:10 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Rarely has the White House briefing room so resembled the main ballroom at a meeting of Conservative Political Action Conference. When he woke up on Tuesday morning, White House press secretary Jay Carney probably thought that he would have to deal with querulous reporters pressing him on all fronts. Little did he know he’d really have to confront citizens bristling with anger over perceived encroachments on their rights by an overweening government. At times, Carney must have wondered whether he had wandered into a congressional town hall circa 2009 with himself in the role
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Analyze this
|
|
Power Line, by Scott Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript
|
Evidence emerges that Obama administration official knew of IRS targeting during 2012 campaign
|
|
CBS News, by Margaret Brennan
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 5/18/2013 9:01:39 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON - There were new questions Saturday night concerning if anyone in the White House was aware of the IRS´ targeting of conservative groups. Inspector General Russell George said he informed a deputy at the Treasury Department in June of 2012 about the probe into the IRS. The Treasury Department confirmed the timeline but said they did not know the details of the investigation until last week.(Snip)Marcus Owens ran the tax-exempt division at the IRS for 10 years. He said it isn´t difficult to figure out who´s doing what at the agency.
|
Camelot Is Burning
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Christopher Burton
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: mitzi- 5/18/2013 8:16:11 PM
Post Reply
|
|
It began in earnest last Friday. A flash mob of latte drinking, tofu eating media that has done its best to quell, rather than fan the flames of truth, turned on one of their own. Jay Carney lay bludgeoned at the base of the podium, a victim of friendly fire. Ironically, the attack was reminiscent of the one in Benghazi he has repeatedly denied the Administration he represents bears any responsibility for. “Changed twelve times?!” came the cries. And with good reason. We were misled; no, lied to.
|
Watergate 2.0 -- why the IRS scandal is far worse
|
|
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,
|
Lew asks Congress for debt increase, says it’s ´not open to debate´
|
|
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.
|
McCaskill Calls For Firing Of All Involved In IRS Targeting Scandal
|
|
KMOX [St, Louis], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/18/2013 2:46:31 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Washington – Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-MO, issued a video statement Friday in response to reports that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative nonprofit groups. (Snip) “There’s a reason Lady Justice wears a blindfold in America. That is because in America, we don’t apply the law based on who you are, who you know, or what you believe. We apply the law equally.” “We should not only fire the head of the IRS, which has occurred, but we’ve got to go down the line and find every single person who had anything to do with this and make sure
|
Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part
|
| | |
|
|