A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Kerry gets overwhelming Senate
backing to lead State Department
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Kerry gets overwhelming Senate
backing to lead State Department

Washington Post, by Anne Gearan

Original Article

Posted By:sagman, 1/30/2013 6:00:46 AM

The Senate overwhelmingly approved Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.) as the next secretary of state Tuesday afternoon, with three Republican “no” votes. The vote was 94 to 3, clearing the way for Kerry to formally take over from Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton on Friday. He assumes the post amid a civil war in Syria that has killed an estimated 60,000 people, stalled nuclear negotiations with Iran and the spread of militancy across North Africa.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: olcap, 1/30/2013 6:04:53 AM     (No. 9147775)

I would guess that the three "no" votes were "allowed" to those senators in consideration of their reelection efforts.


Reply 2 - Posted by: steveW, 1/30/2013 6:18:47 AM     (No. 9147785)

We can be sure the 3 "no" votes did not come from the Vietcong, the Sandinista or Saddam Hussein. After all, Kerry was there to defend them against the evil Americans when it counted.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: lasvegaslou, 1/30/2013 7:03:37 AM     (No. 9147851)

First and foremost, the Senate is a very exclusive old boys club.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Janjan, 1/30/2013 7:04:31 AM     (No. 9147853)

What difference doest it make?


Reply 5 - Posted by: sagman, 1/30/2013 7:05:24 AM     (No. 9147855)

Kerry on Meet the Press

DAVID GREGORY: Welcome, sir.
KERRY: Morning, Tim. Heard you passed away. Glad you’re back.
GREGORY: Thanks. Hillary had Huma. Have you chosen Muslims for State, sir?
KERRY: Yes: muslin ruffles for my office windows and muslin backdrops for videographic contrast in the studios.
GREGORY: You support evenhandednes in the Mideast?
KERRY: Yes. Hamas gets self-propelled howitzers and Israel gets Northrop’s Skyguard Defender™ to fry the shells in mid-flight. No harm, no foul.
GREGORY: Any message for Abbas and Netanyahu?
KERRY: Palestinians must acknowledge Israel’s determination to avoid another holocaust; Israelis must realize our support is unconditional unless they refuse to recognize a Palestinian state bent on their destruction.
GREGORY: What’s happening in Gaza?
KERRY: Where the pyramids are?
GREGORY: That’s Giza. The West Bank?
KERRY: Um, the savings and loan in Houston?
GREGORY: Word’s out of a plan to resettle Israel’s population in a semi-autonomous enclave in Utah.
KERRY: The president’s idea. Thinks it’ll drive the Mormons crazy. That’s off the record.
GREGORY: We’re live, sir. Morale’s okay at State?
KERRY: Hillary posted Morales to Honduras last week.
GREGORY: Has the CIA captured Mullah Omar?
KERRY: Yes. They’re waterballooning him; he hasn’t broken yet.
GREGORY: What about the Taliban?
KERRY: I’m transferring our Jamaican ambassador to Kabul. His message: ´´Come, Mr. Tali Ban. Dally, you’re bananas. Play this right, mon, we gonna go home.´´
GREGORY: That spy swap with Russia. We gave ten back, we got four. Bad deal?
KERRY: No. We get three more agents to be named later and a first round pick.
GREGORY: Who’s really running China?
KERRY: It’s Wen, not Hu. I’ve met both. Hu knows where, or Wen.
GREGORY: Thanks for your time, sir.

Reprise


Reply 6 - Posted by: tmcavl1, 1/30/2013 7:06:10 AM     (No. 9147856)

It has been reported that one of Mr. Kerry´s first trips as Secretary of State will be to Easter Island, where he will pay homage to his ancestors.


Reply 7 - Posted by: Rotten In Denmark, 1/30/2013 7:06:27 AM     (No. 9147857)

Number 4 got it. The only creature under this sun that rolls over in supplication like the r´s is my dog who loves me and wants a belly rub. What do our r´s expect by doing the same?


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: tocsin, 1/30/2013 7:10:20 AM     (No. 9147864)

´´Three Republicans voted against Kerry: Sens. Ted Cruz and John Cornyn of Texas, and Sen. James M. Inhofe (Okla).´´

Thank you, Gentlemen.


Reply 9 - Posted by: papasparky, 1/30/2013 7:11:25 AM     (No. 9147865)

The reading on my contempt meter edged up to 7.8 after the confirmation vote.

I´m sure it would have gone higher if it were not for the large numbers of treasonous subversives who are on constant surveillance above him.

Unchanged are Obama and Jarrett whose readings peg the meter at 10.0


Reply 10 - Posted by: iamtinman, 1/30/2013 7:12:08 AM     (No. 9147867)

It´s a sad day for the senate which totally failed in its duty, and for the country which gets anoter 4 years of an incompetent Secretary of State.


Reply 11 - Posted by: mws50, 1/30/2013 7:12:51 AM     (No. 9147868)

#1
Ted Cruz is not up for re-election for another 6 years.
John Cornyn´s vote would have no effect on his re-election attempt. We plan on primary´ing him next year. He has been hanging around the senate for too long.


Reply 12 - Posted by: mominNoCA, 1/30/2013 7:13:15 AM     (No. 9147869)

#5,

Love it!


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: Bad Dog, 1/30/2013 7:14:05 AM     (No. 9147872)

Seems to me that 97 U.S. Senators need to read up on a little U.S. history - and fairly recent history at that. To now allow this traitor, who ought to have been permanently incarcerated at Leavenworth, to now represent this country he maligned (and maligns still) to the world as a diplomat is absolutely unbelievable and unforgiveable.

Marco, are you listening?


Reply 14 - Posted by: noproblems, 1/30/2013 7:14:58 AM     (No. 9147877)

i doubt this was a vote of support. just could not find a legit way to vote no


Reply 15 - Posted by: Rumblehog, 1/30/2013 7:20:44 AM     (No. 9147885)

"Genghis" John gets his chance to become what he railed about during the Vietnam War. I predict he will make Henry Kissinger look like a piker when it comes to abuse of military force.


Reply 16 - Posted by: Hermit_Crab, 1/30/2013 7:21:57 AM     (No. 9147890)

Well, whaddya expect from a bunch of overaged frat boys?
I thought possibly as many as five might dissent. Three is pretty close to that.
........................

Good one #5.


Reply 17 - Posted by: mws50, 1/30/2013 7:24:50 AM     (No. 9147896)

I think most of the yes votes were cast to get the buffoon out of the Senate.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Freeloader, 1/30/2013 7:37:48 AM     (No. 9147908)

The question needs to be asked today..."Have we finally reached our ´point of no return´ as a nation?"

"America is great because she is good. If America ceases to be good, America will cease to be great."

Alexis de Tocqueville
"Democracy In America"
(1805-1859)


Reply 19 - Posted by: Jebediah, 1/30/2013 7:46:18 AM     (No. 9147916)

What I would like to know is who wrote the law that says that a President should always get the cabinet he nominates, even when the nominee has flaws the size of the Grand Canyon. This "collegial" attitude by the McCaine´s of this world is what allows people like Kerry, and I greatly fear Hagel, to be installed---and meanwhile the Democrats fight tooth and nail and Bork any candidate they don´t look upon as a go along to get along by a Republican President. The McCaine´s of this world!!!!!!! What a Party! And they wonder why they are losing us.


Reply 20 - Posted by: Judith, 1/30/2013 7:53:44 AM     (No. 9147927)

This congress is a disgrace. As far as I am concerned NONE of the political parties represent me.


Reply 21 - Posted by: a man over thirty, 1/30/2013 7:54:39 AM     (No. 9147931)

I just wonder how John McCain can sleep at night when his ´friend,´ Genghis John Kerry, becomes SecState with the help of McCain´s vote.
Horseface threw you under the bus while you were a resident of the Hanoi Hilton, McCain.

Senatorial idiot (but I repeat myself.)


Reply 22 - Posted by: Not your typical New Yorker, 1/30/2013 7:59:43 AM     (No. 9147945)

They all, on both sides, really and truly suck.

Sheesh, this great country only lasted a little over 200 years.

History laughs at us....we´re pikers in the scheme of things.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: gator, 1/30/2013 8:10:17 AM     (No. 9147965)

You are correct #4; there is no saving the country we once knew.


Reply 24 - Posted by: DaBigGuy, 1/30/2013 8:15:28 AM     (No. 9147975)

Current Senate patriot count: 3.


Reply 25 - Posted by: catfur27, 1/30/2013 8:22:19 AM     (No. 9147992)

..I saw that Gigolo Johnny was highly supported by Viet Nam veterans......the ones on the other side.


Reply 26 - Posted by: Grambo, 1/30/2013 8:34:01 AM     (No. 9148010)

Senate “collegiality” isn´t the reason Kerry got a 97/3 vote. Where was senate collegiality in the Bork and Thomas hearings? Senate collegiality is what the Democrats demand for their own and what the feckless Republicans dutifully give them. Dirty politics is what them Democrats give in return.


Reply 27 - Posted by: Coy860, 1/30/2013 8:46:34 AM     (No. 9148045)

On behalf of my deceased spouse, (USN ret.)
I give Kerry the one fingered salute.
Betrayer of the Navy, betrayer of America.
My spouse served with honor and valor as a Brown Water Sailor in Viet Nam ..something Kerry can never claim.


Reply 28 - Posted by: Felixcat, 1/30/2013 8:50:37 AM     (No. 9148054)

The president gets what he wants when he has a D after his name, otherwise, it´s screw you - we´ll do more than advise and consent - we will obstruct.

Kind of surprised to see that Sen Paul voted yes. hmmm

As for Sen Corker - what is with him?

When your elected reprsentatives stop beliveing in the country and its Constitution - what´s left for us - We the People?


Reply 29 - Posted by: mickturn, 1/30/2013 9:01:12 AM     (No. 9148089)

Anything to get him out of the Senate...


Reply 30 - Posted by: Bobn.T, 1/30/2013 9:04:53 AM     (No. 9148099)

I pray for our country.
I pray that God will deliver us from this evil.


Reply 31 - Posted by: melman, 1/30/2013 9:31:59 AM     (No. 9148174)

Why I left rthe Repblican part , bunch of do-nothins except enrich themselves.


Reply 32 - Posted by: wyowumin, 1/30/2013 9:33:49 AM     (No. 9148178)

I am ashamed and embarrassed that both my Senators, Hide-under-the-desk Enzi and "Conservative" Barraso, voted for this traitorous piece of slime.


Reply 33 - Posted by: sherlock1, 1/30/2013 9:35:17 AM     (No. 9148182)

Well, I´ll admit that Kerry has at least two times as many qualifications as Hillary, who had zero.


Reply 34 - Posted by: Udanja99, 1/30/2013 9:39:33 AM     (No. 9148191)

Ditto, #20. While I appreciate Sagman´s efforts, I can no longer find any humor in anything that is happening these days. When the congress overwhelmingly confirms a known traitor to a cabinet position, this country is over. I weep.


Reply 35 - Posted by: shamrock, 1/30/2013 9:40:24 AM     (No. 9148194)

Awesome sagman!

Our two nitwits from Idaho voted for lurch, anything to get to those cocktail parties with senators from real states.


Reply 36 - Posted by: right-turn, 1/30/2013 9:41:41 AM     (No. 9148198)

Enough to make you puke. Maybe more than enough.


Reply 37 - Posted by: Chuzzles, 1/30/2013 10:01:05 AM     (No. 9148247)

That is why sagman´s efforts are doubly appreciated right now #35. He managed to tweak Kerry and Harry Belafonte in one post. Muy awesome.

As much as I despise Kerry for his traitorous behaviour, I despise John McCain even more for his allowing of it.


Reply 38 - Posted by: Eheu Fugaces, 1/30/2013 10:04:13 AM     (No. 9148256)

Ho, Ho, Ho Chi Minh -- the Viet Cong did finally win!

A great day for America-haters everywhere!


Reply 39 - Posted by: garyhope, 1/30/2013 10:07:30 AM     (No. 9148267)

I´m with # 17. It´s not a bad thing to have Lurch out of the Senate and the country.

I hope he doesn´t run into any IED´s out there.


Reply 40 - Posted by: KanCreeper, 1/30/2013 10:08:42 AM     (No. 9148269)

This whole Kerry Debacle make me wonder if those strokes to the head and the pains from his broken bones have wiped McCain´s memories of those days spent at The Hanoi Hilton from his mind? After all he was awarded his Medals and Rank on the basis of what he physically endured...While Jon Effin´ Kerry created his own bravery; by carrying his own Camera,Typewriter to self Document his "War Record" to advance his political career. He is such a model for America. Particularly when he threw all other American Service Personnel ´under the bus´ by giving false testimony before Congress and then publicly trashing his "Service in the Navy´ by throwing a fist full of"medals(?)" over the WH Fence ( creating his OWN Photo-Op. Kerry is a despicable human who deserves to be in the a prison in the dust-bin of History.


Reply 41 - Posted by: nightvision, 1/30/2013 10:26:30 AM     (No. 9148316)

#5, another brilliant piece.
"waterballooning"...only quick reflexes saved my computer from a serious coffee spew.
Line after line contain delicious nuggets.
Well done, sir.

I have a feeling that with Monsieur Kerry (who, BTW, served in Viet Nam) front and center, you will have a target-rich environment for your bon mots.


Reply 42 - Posted by: coldoc, 1/30/2013 10:46:06 AM     (No. 9148369)

Pathetic display by those involved. The frat boys always support one of their own, over and above any ethical or moral concerns. Absolutely pathetic.


Reply 43 - Posted by: jimmiet, 1/30/2013 10:47:54 AM     (No. 9148374)

Let´s see we have an undocumented muslim in the white house. An unabashed con man whore as former president, a brain damaged ,lying former secy of state, 1st lady to the aforementioned former president, a former campus radical leftist on the supeme court, a racist AG, and a tax fraud as secy of the treasury. A treasonous gigolo as new secy of state seems quite appropriate, actually. Wow are we screwed.


Reply 44 - Posted by: chicodon, 1/30/2013 10:51:32 AM     (No. 9148386)

#5
You give Kerry too much credit. /s This entire regime is a farce.


Reply 45 - Posted by: rael, 1/30/2013 10:52:31 AM     (No. 9148391)

I have to wonder about those republicans who voted ´yes´ on this. Maybe they should consider changing parties? Because now we have a man who received a Dishonorable Discharge running the state department. Is that even legal?


Reply 46 - Posted by: TruthAndJustice, 1/30/2013 10:59:27 AM     (No. 9148413)

Only three Senators who give a hoot about this country...the rest join John Kerry as TRAITORS...

Explain yourselves Rubio and Paul...are your votes bought so easily...

Cruz continues to impress.


Reply 47 - Posted by: EnsignO´Toole, 1/30/2013 11:05:39 AM     (No. 9148434)

Hopefully, the Senate Republicans who voted to confirm Kerry just wanted to get him out of the Senate.

We shouldn´t be too surprised that McCain voted to confirm him despite McCain´s prisoner of war status in 1971. IIRC McCain was being considered for Kerry´s running mate in 2004 - McCain certainly didn´t try hard to squelch the rumor.

All I can say is shame on 97 Senators for elevating a traitor to SOS. I hope everyone realizes he now becomes the fourth in the line to the presidency.

This is almost more sickening than I can endure. Pray hard, folks. I have faith that God is in charge; the frustrating part is I don´t know what God is doing.


Reply 48 - Posted by: sagman, 1/30/2013 11:29:12 AM     (No. 9148511)

I completely understand your point, #35.

When Obama won, I was so depressed I posted the following: ´´I am laying down my satirist´s pen. Humor involving this man, his administration, and his Party is now, in my view, misplaced. There is nothing to laugh at any more.´´

It took me a while to remember my primary purpose in writing the satires: to ridicule phonies like Obama and Kerry and Hillary and Biden. Humor was just a byproduct.

I started posting stuff again when somebody reminded me that criticism rolls off their backs, but they hate being mocked. These days, it´s one of the few ways we can get under their skins.

An aside: obviously, I can´t acknowledge every instance of positive feedback, but I do appreciate it, more than you know.


Reply 49 - Posted by: broken01, 1/30/2013 11:35:51 AM     (No. 9148538)

Heinz 57 private jet- 10 million dollars
Windsurfing equipment for failed 2004 presidential photo op- 10 grand
Yacht that he tried to hide in Rhode Island to avoid Taxachusetts property taxes- 70 million dollars.
Number 5´s post about this dunderhead and Odummer jockey shorts holder David(gun clip) Gregory being themselves and making me laugh so hard I almost shot pepsi out of my nose-PRICELESS. There are a few things money can´t buy(honor, integrity, courage). For everything else there´s MasterCard. Thank you and good day to you all.


Reply 50 - Posted by: RancherJack, 1/30/2013 11:46:53 AM     (No. 9148559)

Se, John Heinz (R) rolls over in his grave ...

... since it´s his money John Kerry lives on.


Reply 51 - Posted by: VAfreedomluver, 1/30/2013 12:03:10 PM     (No. 9148588)

I wonder how much Teresa´s travel budget is going to be? You know she´s going to spend the next four years sight-seeing along with her darling Jenjis John.


Reply 52 - Posted by: GreatPlains, 1/30/2013 12:15:51 PM     (No. 9148611)

McCain and Graham were able to prevent Obama from nominating Susan Rice for this position.
Which was an amazing feat considering
that Republicans only have 45 members
compared
to the 55 the Democrats have.
Every Republican can vote against Hagel and he will be confirmed with 51 Democrat votes.
Instead of threatening the present Republican Senators , the energy would be better spent trying to defeat
Democrats next election.
But, that unfortunately doesn´t seem to be the priority of the Tea Party.
They would rather defeat electable Republicans.


Reply 53 - Posted by: M Stuart, 1/30/2013 12:20:47 PM     (No. 9148628)

I didn´t even bother calling Saxby Chambliss and Johnny Isakson on this one. They´ve been in the senate too long to have any fire in their bellies.

One small comfort: At least he isn´t President. I´m sorry to the Swift Boat Veterans who stopped him before.


Reply 54 - Posted by: Periwinkel, 1/30/2013 12:23:39 PM     (No. 9148634)

#11 Buena suerta! Let us know if you need help.


Reply 55 - Posted by: ragu, 1/30/2013 12:40:02 PM     (No. 9148671)

Another reason I am done with the Republican Party.


Reply 56 - Posted by: Penney, 1/30/2013 1:01:04 PM     (No. 9148708)

0bama is trying his best to turn the country upside-down & inside-out with statist choices such as this insult to military veterans and all who still support Liberty. mmm mmm mmm

dem pols have no shame


Reply 57 - Posted by: kono, 1/30/2013 1:05:40 PM     (No. 9148716)

I wonder how many senators voted to confirm Kerry simply because they were sick of having the ketchup-digger around them in the Senate.


Reply 58 - Posted by: King of all trolls, 1/30/2013 1:16:23 PM     (No. 9148731)

Hilarious, #5.


Reply 59 - Posted by: Polecat49, 1/30/2013 1:30:53 PM     (No. 9148761)

Hey, mitch. Where were you when the vote came up to support the United States of America? Oh, I forget, you traded your pea sized brain into zero, so that he, his regime and the liberal, socialist, marxist, communist, democRAT media would be nice to you.


Reply 60 - Posted by: G2bme, 1/30/2013 1:48:26 PM     (No. 9148789)

The overwhelming pro vote was so they could finally get rid of him from thr Senate!


Reply 61 - Posted by: nightvision, 1/30/2013 2:08:39 PM     (No. 9148832)

#50, sagman, thank goodness you came back.
And you´re right. They cannot stand to be mocked.
Particularly the imperious, thin-skinned one.

Keep calm and carry on!


Reply 62 - Posted by: Timber Queen, 1/30/2013 2:19:00 PM     (No. 9148849)

#54 – The Susan Rice nomination was a decoy that gave McPain and Ms. Graham “fighting” creds at no real political cost to them, even as John Kerry was being publicly recognized as the real nominee. This is an amazing feat? I hardly think so.

You argue that because there are only 45 Republicans (even if they all vote against a nominee) they cannot stop a nomination, its OK for them to give any dim nominee a pass no matter how unqualified or how traitorous. Where were the tough questions? Where was the evidence of the Swiftboat Vets? 3 noes out of 45 and we’re not supposed to notice? When the dims are in the minority they seem to be able to make a lot of noise and hobble appointments. Some of us would just like to see half of that type of “energy” spent by Republican electeds when openly radical dims are nominated.

Instead we’re accused of “threatening” the current crop of cowards and scolded to use our “energy” to defeat the dims in the next election with “electable Republicans”. What evidence is there that a “republican” majority senate would act any differently? The excuse then would be that their majority isn’t big enough, or that it’s the majority’s responsibility to make sure that the minority point of view prevails - out of fairness, you know. Yes, you are correct when you say the Tea Party wants to defeat these kinds of “representatives”. Progressives run “both” political parties, and patriots will fight both. Waiting until the next election is not an option.

Who is John Galt? What difference, at this point, does it make?


Reply 63 - Posted by: Melody, 1/30/2013 3:13:57 PM     (No. 9148959)

Oh, ouch, #64. Yes, let´s use Hillary´s line, but against her and her friends. That one hurt. I understand how you feel, though.

Thanks, #5, for using your wit to give us smiles. We need all we can get.

Senator Toomey, what´s the matter with you that you voted for Kerry? Arrrgh.


Reply 64 - Posted by: saraguay, 1/30/2013 3:24:11 PM     (No. 9148983)

john kerry is a social climber, lazy,a coward and a manipulator. he has does absolutely zero in the senate for 25 years either for his state or anything else.
he married into big big money twice which financed his political ambitions. howie carr ridicules him mercilessly on his radio program and coined the term, "live shot kerry" because he is always in a photo op - no matter how insignificant but might make him look good.
i believe that his entire life has been spent looking for fame and validation of something other that what he really is (see above). since he can´t be president, being sec´y of state will please "luvey" and give him some additional status (in his head).
can he make a decent sos? almost certainly not, but he may be ever so slightly better than hilary because he is a male and the only sex worth talking to or negotiating with by the misogynistic "folks" in the middle east.
i predict, however, that the tensions and scariness in n. and s. korea will get far worse during his tenure as sos and the middle east will burn and they will try to take america with it. john kerry will most likely do as hilary, watch, complain and look tired and serious, accomplishing nothing.
the next few months are the most frightening to me because i fear that al quaeda and other militant groups/terrorists will use this time to do something dastardly to our country with little fear of reprisal.
god bless america.


Reply 65 - Posted by: fysammy, 1/30/2013 3:47:35 PM     (No. 9149027)

Sagman," it´s Giza, West Bank, S&L in Houston?". Your best ever!!!



Post Reply   Close thread 721241




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "sagman"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "sagman"



Biden to use Obama’s postelection
‘flexibility’ on weapons with Russia
Washington Times, by Dave Boyer    Original Article
Posted By: sagman- 2/1/2013 5:52:05 AM     Post Reply
Vice President Joseph R. Biden will discuss arms control Saturday with Russia’s top envoy, a meeting that could shed light on President Obama’s unguarded comment last year that he would have more “flexibility” to negotiate with the Russians after his re-election. Mr. Biden will hold a one-on-one session with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov in Munich during a four-day European trip with his wife, Jill, that begins Friday. Administration officials confirmed Thursday that the vice president’s agenda with Mr. Lavrov includes an exploration of ways to reduce both nations’ nuclear weapons stockpiles.

Kerry gets overwhelming Senate
backing to lead State Department
Washington Post, by Anne Gearan    Original Article
Posted By: sagman- 1/30/2013 6:00:46 AM     Post Reply
The Senate overwhelmingly approved Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.) as the next secretary of state Tuesday afternoon, with three Republican “no” votes. The vote was 94 to 3, clearing the way for Kerry to formally take over from Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton on Friday. He assumes the post amid a civil war in Syria that has killed an estimated 60,000 people, stalled nuclear negotiations with Iran and the spread of militancy across North Africa.

Debacle in Benghazi
Weekly Standard, by Stephen F. Hayes and Thomas Joscelyn    Original Article
Posted By: sagman- 1/23/2013 6:38:58 AM     Post Reply
On September 21, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton spoke to reporters before a meeting with the Pakistani foreign minister. She addressed the September 11 assault on U.S. facilities in Benghazi, Libya. “What happened was a terrorist attack, and we will not rest until we have tracked down and brought to justice the terrorists who murdered four Americans.” Clinton’s statement was notable. It was the strongest and most direct assessment of the attacks from any Obama administration official in the first 10 days after the deaths.

Gun Control by Executive Order?
National Review, by Scott Coffina    Original Article
Posted By: sagman- 1/16/2013 6:26:26 AM     Post Reply
The horrific recent mass murder of 26 children and adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School predictably has reignited the gun-control debate in this country. (snip) The task force led by Vice President Joe Biden has met mostly with groups either in favor of or opposed to greater restrictions on guns and ammunition. Facing strong political opposition in Congress from both parties, Vice President Biden and President Barack Obama each have suggested publicly that the president will act by executive order to restrict guns.

People are Buying Guns
and Ammunition for a Reason
American Thinker, by Neil Snyder    Original Article
Posted By: sagman- 12/25/2012 6:38:01 AM     Post Reply
It´s 2:00 a.m. You are at home in your bed sound asleep. Your wife is sleeping beside you, and your children are asleep in their rooms down the hall. The muffled sound of a window breaking interrupts your slumber. You´re groggy and you wonder if it was just a dream, so you lie there quietly and listen. A few seconds later, you hear other sounds.

How Romney Lost
National Review Online, by Kevin D. Williamson    Original Article
Posted By: sagman- 11/7/2012 6:28:13 AM     Post Reply
Columbus, Ohio — The realities of the electoral map meant that the Romney campaign really had no choice but to bet big on Ohio, and that bet was a loser. In addition to some critical on-the-ground specifics — Ohio is not hurting as badly as the rest of the country — there were three main reasons for that. 1. Ohio likes crony capitalism. The automotive bailout is popular in Ohio, and not just among self-interested workers and investors in that industry. Putting General Motors on federal life support is economically daft and morally dubious, but it gave the Obama administration a powerful tool for convincing

Obama's Loss: Inevitable for Years
American Thinker, by C. Edmund Wright    Original Article
Posted By: sagman- 11/1/2012 4:16:32 AM     Post Reply
Do not be seduced by the disproportionate emphasis on recent events with regard to Barack Obama's pending landslide loss. I submit that a more sober analysis indicates that November 2012 has been inevitable for at least four years. In some ways, it's been inevitable for even longer than that. You see, Barack Obama and his statist agenda have failed because they could not possibly succeed. In a way, electing Obama was liberal America's dash off a cliff -- and the 2012 election is merely the day they officially make contact with the ground.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



White House Chief of Staff knew about
damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark

61 replie(s)
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.

Obama: "As An African American
You Have To Work Twice As Hard
As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"

60 replie(s)
Real Clear Politics, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM     Post Reply
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life

BREAKING: WashPost Reports
Obama DOJ Also Spied on
James Rosen of Fox News

49 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham    Original Article
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM     Post Reply
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:

Candy Crowley: Is it Possible
This Isn´t Political and
IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass
the Tea Party?

44 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM     Post Reply
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week

White House Aide calls
Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´

41 replie(s)
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM     Post Reply
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.

If Your Doctor Asks You About
Guns, Do You Have to Answer?

39 replie(s)
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM     Post Reply
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement

Democratic Senator uses Okla.
tornado for anti-GOP rant
over global warming

39 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor    Original Article
Posted By: bamapreacher- 5/20/2013 8:20:54 PM     Post Reply
While many Americans were tuned into news coverage of the massive damage from tornadoes ravaging the state of Oklahoma, Rhode Island Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse took to the Senate floor to rail against his Republican colleagues for denying the theory of anthropogenic global warming. Whitehouse spent 15 minutes chastising GOP senators and justified his remarks by alluding to states that seek federal assistance in the wake of natural disasters. “So, you may have a question for me,” Whitehouse said. “Why do you care? Why do you, Sheldon Whitehouse, Democrat of Rhode Island, care


Post Reply   Close thread 721241





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~