A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC



        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


  Topic: The Feinstein “Assault Weapons”
Ban: What’s It All About?
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
The Feinstein “Assault Weapons”
Ban: What’s It All About?

Power Line, by John Hinderaker

Original Article

Posted By:Dreadnought, 1/24/2013 10:46:20 PM

Today Senator Dianne Feinstein unveiled her long-promised legislation to ban “assault weapons.” Since there is no such thing as an assault weapon, we will have to read the text of the law to see what it actually does. So far, I haven’t seen the text anywhere, but Feinstein’s web site has a fairly detailed description of the bill, including a list of the 157 weapons that are specifically banned. News coverage of Feinstein’s proposal has been laughably bad. Feinstein’s bill purports to toughen the 1994 assault weapons ban by reducing the number of “military style” features that make a firearm

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Bobn.T, 1/24/2013 10:56:00 PM     (No. 9137810)

I just gave the NRA a contribution.
I pray that God will deliver us from this evil destroying the country.

America needs a white knight on a white horse.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: ccyr, 1/24/2013 10:59:22 PM     (No. 9137814)

I just figured it was a way to sell more AR-15´s because that´s exactly what it´s doing. While I was waiting for a lane to open up, I saw ten of them jump off the shelf in a little more than an hour this afternoon at $1,600 to $2,300 a piece.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: thewarden, 1/24/2013 11:10:27 PM     (No. 9137822)

Wake me up when I care what a filthy rich eitist with personal security and an unrestricted concealed carry permit says...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: ccyr, 1/24/2013 11:13:17 PM     (No. 9137825)

If we are going to pass a law to keep Sandy Hook from happening again, shouldn´t we pass a law that would have saved a single victim had it been enacted at the time of the shooting rather than a law that wouldn´t have saved a single life had it been enacted before the shooting?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: King of all trolls, 1/24/2013 11:29:43 PM     (No. 9137837)

Crime rates have been dropping precipitously over the last 20 years. Some psychopath commits a heinous crime with a stolen weapon and suddenly our Constitutional rights are negotiable.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: jl80863, 1/25/2013 12:14:15 AM     (No. 9137869)

If they want to ban "ugly guns" again can we ban ugly legislators?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: dvc, 1/25/2013 1:01:34 AM     (No. 9137889)

Feinstein hates military styled weapons, mental illness on her part. She is psychotic, totally illogical.

ALL these bills are OBVIOUSLY infringement on our right to keep and bear arms and are clearly unconstitutional. We need to stop this in the Senate AND in the House, BOTH.

Remember - the "no private sales" push, being sold as the ´gun show loophole´ is equally fictional, but the push is intended to result in registering all guns. Confiscation to follow.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: gator, 1/25/2013 2:31:46 AM     (No. 9137933)

The bill, like the woman, is stupid. But so are many Americans who (if even aware of it) will swallow it hook, line, and sinker.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: hoosierblue, 1/25/2013 5:04:42 AM     (No. 9137960)

The Feinstein “Assault Weapons”
Ban: What’s It All About? -------CONTROL !!!!!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: Trigger2, 1/25/2013 5:27:10 AM     (No. 9137971)

What´s it about? Removing guns behind every blade of grass so the country is wide open for muslim/chinese/fill in the blank takeover.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: Red Jeep, 1/25/2013 7:32:06 AM     (No. 9138077)

"...the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

I should be able to own any weapon I want without licensing, registration or a background check.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Janjan, 1/25/2013 7:33:41 AM     (No. 9138080)

Unless Obama can put the full force of the military on the streets, assuming they would obey such an order, no one in the Federal Government is going to disarm Americans. They will just turn us all into criminals.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: 4Justice, 1/25/2013 7:46:21 AM     (No. 9138089)

I want to make a bumper sticker for that one #6. Ban ugly and scary legislators!! Totally agree, #11.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: Bad Dog, 1/25/2013 7:58:30 AM     (No. 9138118)

Yeah, somebody go tell the thugs in the ghettos that their favorite toys are being banned by their favorite politicians.

And watch them laugh and blast their way into YOUR saferoom.....

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: stablemoney, 1/25/2013 7:58:32 AM     (No. 9138119)

Did the NRA shoot anybody, Dianne? The NRA was home watching tv at the time of the crime.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: miceal, 1/25/2013 8:06:49 AM     (No. 9138142)

She should be impeached, she is attempting to circumvent our Constitution without the required amendment. Articles of Impeachment and at least a LONG prison sentence....

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: disasterman, 1/25/2013 8:07:10 AM     (No. 9138144)

A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity.
Sigmund Freud

This about sums up most of the liberals/progressives that I know.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: preciosodrogas, 1/25/2013 8:29:50 AM     (No. 9138200)

Of course it is grandstanding, and look at the attention it has gotten her. But then gun bands are not about preventing violence, it is all about wanting to project the fantasy that all is well in lala land.
Needing a gun for self defense or protection against tyranny exposes the truth and they simply can´t handle the truth. They so want to control all the pieces because they want reality to conform to their beliefs. They are scared and can´t handle the truth so we must sacrifice our liberties so they can live in their pretend world.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: Mr. Know-It-All, 1/25/2013 8:32:36 AM     (No. 9138206)

I have seen the supposed list. It specifically bans the Ruger Mini 14 tactical rifle. The only difference between the tactical version and a run of the mill ranch rifle is the stock. Period. All of the important stuff is exactly the same.

You can buy a ranch rifle and make into a tactical by buying an after market folding and adjustable length stock. So I suppose that such stocks should be made illegal so that you cannot do that.

As hildabeast would say, what does it matter? The ranch rifle fires the same rounds, in the same manner, and at the same rate. The only difference is how they look.

Feinstein is obviously driven by some kind of mental aberration against the way a rifle looks. Or to put it another way; she´s a loon.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 20 - Posted by: texaseducator, 1/25/2013 8:37:49 AM     (No. 9138222)

The only thing most of these people know about weapons is what they see on tv and at the movies and Toys R Us. They have no idea how weapons work or why they are designed the way they are or what the real descriptive terms mean. They reveal their ignorance everytime they talk about weapons. The scary thing is they know about the same amount on everything they talk about.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: safesword, 1/25/2013 8:50:26 AM     (No. 9138247)

these idiots in congress...every time i read what they are up to,i scream so many four letter words...for hours at a time!!!..they drive me to become so apoplectic!!!!!UGGGHHHH!!! i cant take reading anymore!!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 22 - Posted by: marthaville, 1/25/2013 9:12:06 AM     (No. 9138305)

Waiting for Sen. Feinstein to start crying like Hillary did. That always, always disarms the men.

Don´t you love being told what to do by a wealthy woman who has spent her life working in government jobs? Redistribute your wealth, Dianne.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: bob913, 1/25/2013 9:37:14 AM     (No. 9138375)

Whada ya know

Feinstein Gun Control Bill Would Exempt Government Officials...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 24 - Posted by: pete moss, 1/25/2013 10:09:57 AM     (No. 9138463)

"Could Diane Feinstein´s assault on our civil rights actually be a smoke screen to divert attention from this? On the day the
new Congress convened this year she introduced legislation to route $25 billion in tax payer money to a government agency that had just awarded her husband´s real estate firm a lucrative contract to sell foreclosed properties at compensation rates higher than the industry norms. Her intervention on behalf of the FDIC is unusual since she isn´t a member of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban affairs with jurisdiction over FDIC; and the committee is supposed to operate from money it raises from bank-paid insurance payments- not direct federal dollars." In other words, she´s a crook.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 25 - Posted by: Mr. Hanky, 1/25/2013 10:12:05 AM     (No. 9138473)

And "government officials" are exempted.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 26 - Posted by: Grambo, 1/25/2013 10:28:19 AM     (No. 9138513)

The Left lives for control, and an armed and obstinate American is problematic to them. So, what to do…oh, I know….

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 27 - Posted by: RancherJack, 1/25/2013 10:55:38 AM     (No. 9138583)

Feinstein exempts government employees, contractors.

That´s all we need to know.

It is us v. Them.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 28 - Posted by: capt scurvey, 1/25/2013 11:03:41 AM     (No. 9138613)

Disarm Chicago´s ghettos first as a test run, DiFi, then get back to us when that´s been accomplished...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 29 - Posted by: sdish, 1/25/2013 11:08:54 AM     (No. 9138625)

This is an attempt to ban guns having certain cosmetic features with legislation that’s based on foolish reasoning, promoted by liberal politicians for deceitful purposes.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 30 - Posted by: Marzipan, 1/25/2013 11:16:51 AM     (No. 9138645)

Meanwhile back at the peoples house Mr. pResident is mandating all high schools outfit their sports programs to be totally accessible to the handicapped. Hmmm, not enough money for teaching them, let´s have them spend more to include a special olympics theme. I do think high schools make the sports available already for those kids that are truly motivated.. It´s all about spend spend spend so we the legislative ruling class can continue to eat cake.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 31 - Posted by: bighambone, 1/25/2013 11:20:34 AM     (No. 9138659)

The liberal Democrats can´t stop criminals and crazy people from getting their hands on guns because there are too many guns out there for the liberals to ever effectively control. Banning guns and ammunition magazines will only create new black markets for those items throughout the USA.

What the liberals really want to do is wipe out most of the US small arms and related industries that the liberals consider to be conservative oriented enterprises. Once just about all modern firearms produced and sold in the USA, both rifles and handguns, are banned, there is no way that those industries could survive by bidding on ever diminishing military contracts alone. With those industries gone, all the tens of thousands of well paying American jobs and the technical know how connected to them would also be gone.

The liberal mission there is clear, and at the same time the liberals refer to the mentally ill, a few of who perpetrate the mass shootings, as being victims who they want to help. The liberals also are silent on the movie, TV, and addictive violent video game industries those entertainment products give vulnerable young people with mental disorders, who grow up in places like peaceful small Connecticut towns, ideas completely foreign to those places, like that to gain media attention to themselves the thing to do is to commit criminally insane acts while setting out on their own individual suicide missions. Of course the mental health industry and the makers of violent movie, TV, and video games are all liberal Democrat constituency groups.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 32 - Posted by: Butch59, 1/25/2013 11:21:40 AM     (No. 9138665)

In a quick response to the author, yes, there are, or have been, rifle launched grenades. The old M1 Garand of WWII fame had the capable of firing them. I fired on during basic training the Ft. Polk, La. 1963.

And, if I came up and beat you to a pulp with a wooden club or any other blunt object, whould that also be classified as an assult weapon? After all, I "assulted" you with one.

And in response to poster #12, Obozo won´t turn the military on Americian citizens en mass. He will act piece meal by sending federal agents to individuals or small groups and threaten them with prison if they don´t turn it their guns. Or do what the Russians did in 1917-1918. Just round them up and shoot them.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 33 - Posted by: chicodon, 1/25/2013 11:41:23 AM     (No. 9138722)

We need to have this conversation once and for all. If they want to modify the 2nd Amendment then they can make their case. There´s a mechanism for amending the Constitution. The founders couldn´t envision the day that the citizens would be so unequally outgunned. It began with the National Firearms Act in 1934 and now this. Let´s get it out in the open. Either we have a right to "bear" arms or we don´t.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 34 - Posted by: loveUSA, 1/25/2013 12:17:18 PM     (No. 9138812)

Have you noticed that these so called gun safety laws exempt Congress? This proposed assault weapons bill exempts them.

ObamaCare exempts them. Congress has their own health care. They make laws for the citizens, but these laws don´t apply to them, the ruling class. That´s the definition of an elitist. And the definition of evil.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 35 - Posted by: kctiger, 1/25/2013 1:20:42 PM     (No. 9138973)

It´s not God´s job to deliver us from the evils of this world.

It is our job to keep evil at bay while we are in this world!

We are failing miserably!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 36 - Posted by: jintz, 1/25/2013 1:38:36 PM     (No. 9139006)

Any bets that all Pols will be exempt from the gun bill just as with the health care bill,phonies the whole bunch of them

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 37 - Posted by: RKFree2b, 1/25/2013 1:40:23 PM     (No. 9139013)

It´s about taking time trying to control something (guns) that congress and the white house have no constitutional authority to do.

It´s about not taking time to control something(federal government spending) that congress and the white house are constitutionally mandated to do.

It´s about transforming the United States Federal government into a tyrannical government.

C U T T H E S P E N D I N G ! ! !

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 38 - Posted by: weejun, 1/25/2013 2:05:14 PM     (No. 9139052)

As a an avid gun owner, the current "debate" is maddening: the misinformation in the press is staggering, and the public is being manipulated like putty by the liberals. Even John Elway - bless his heart - was duped last night by Piers Morgan, who asked him if he could see any reason why a citizen should own a rifle that can spew out "hundreds of rounds" at a time? Poor John´s reply: I don´t personally own a MACHINE GUN and I can´t see why anybody should." There´s a reason, John: except for holders of expensive and hard to get Class III firearm licenses, these weapons have been strictly controlled/registered in the US since 1934. Why can´t the press at least acknowledge that it doesn´t have a clue what it´s talking about when it comes to "assault weapons" (rhetorical question - sorry)? The job to fix this lack of knowledge and our inability to understand the true facts about gun murders in the US is almost too overwhelming to address. We have a long, hard fight ahead of us.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 39 - Posted by: caddyjak, 1/25/2013 2:09:30 PM     (No. 9139058)

Wasn´t it either Feinsteen or Boxer´s husband who sold tech secrets to the Chinese? Combine those two with Piloopsy and California voters should be disenfranchised immediately.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 40 - Posted by: woodsman, 1/25/2013 3:20:58 PM     (No. 9139189)

I noticed that too #19 about the mini 14...This won´t pass and if it does expect a lot of new manufacturers offering retrofit more "hunting" looking wooden stocks for AR´s and AKs....New stock....new gun....easy.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 41 - Posted by: kenecarroll, 1/25/2013 4:06:44 PM     (No. 9139275)

Oh...but wait....we have to pass the gun control bill first before you can see what is in it.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 42 - Posted by: vesicant, 1/25/2013 4:19:44 PM     (No. 9139294)

This guy Hinderaker, whoever he is, needs some education too. For instance, barrels are threaded not just for silencers, but also to accept flash suppressors (which only suppress the flash for the user, not those downrange), muzzle brakes, or thread protectors.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 43 - Posted by: larryp, 1/25/2013 8:55:54 PM     (No. 9139738)

I called a radio station a few yrs ago about the NRA. I said to the answerer onthe Phone "why doesn´t the NRA buy some TV time or News paper space to outline the group´s views ? He said tjat they can´t. I said Why? He said that the newspapersand the TV stations won´t sell any time or space to the NRA!
I don´t know if that is still true but when have you seen a full page ad from the NRA in the Paper or a TV special?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 44 - Posted by: Kennerboy, 1/25/2013 9:44:36 PM     (No. 9139786)

Time to get serious about term limits.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 720487




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"



Long-term unemployed struggle
to find — and keep — jobs
Washington Post, by Ylan Q. Mui    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/18/2014 10:37:47 PM     Post Reply
For the long-term unemployed, finding a job is hard — but keeping one may be even harder. New research tracking people who have been out of work for six months or longer found that 23 percent of them landed a job within a few months of the study. But a year later, more than a third of that group was unemployed again or out of the labor force altogether. The findings are the latest in a bleak but growing body of literature suggesting long-term unemployment has become a trap that is difficult to escape. Economists say that means the long-term unemployed could become a permanent underclass, left behind by the nation’s broader

Social Security stops trying
to collect on old debts by
seizing tax refunds
Washington Post, by Marc Fisher    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/14/2014 10:13:04 PM     Post Reply
The Social Security Administration announced Monday that it will immediately cease efforts to collect on taxpayers’ debts to the government that are more than 10 years old. The action comes after The Washington Post reported that the government was seizing state and federal tax refunds that were on their way to about 400,000 Americans who had relatives who owed money to Social Security. In many cases, the people whose refunds were intercepted had never heard of any debt, and the debts dated as far back as the middle of the past century. “I have directed an immediate halt to further

Wendy Davis Ethical Questions Surface
Breitbart Texas, by Bob Price    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/14/2014 8:58:53 AM     Post Reply
Despite promises to the contrary, it appears that State Senator Wendy Davis (D-Fort Worth) voted on bills that affect her clients and favorably impact the bottom line of her law firm. “I have never done anything in a way that represents a conflict in my voting and something that would benefit me personally,” she said in an interview, but state records seem to tell a different story. The Dallas Morning News´ Senior Political Writer Wayne Slater (DMN) reported that Davis supported legislation governing a toll road project. That would be all well and good except for the fact that the

Democrats Lose Two More Special
Elections They Didn’t Expect To
National Review Online, by John Fund    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/14/2014 8:38:34 AM     Post Reply
Democrats have had a recurring problem in special elections this year: Their voters aren’t turning out. If a weak economy and continued Obamacare problems persist, the November elections could be a disaster for Democrats. Last week, Democrats lost two special elections they weren’t planning to. Arlington, Va., is a classic wealthy ObamaTown, filled with government workers and limousine liberals. Mitt Romney won only 29 percent of the vote in 2012. But last Tuesday, Democrats lost their first election for the five-member Arlington County Board in 15 years when John Vihstadt, a Republican running as an independent, won a vacancy on

Nevada ranch standoff could leave
dirt on Harry Reid’s reputation
Washington Times, by Valerie Richardson    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/13/2014 10:19:32 PM     Post Reply
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said little as federal agents seized and then released cattle last week from the Bundy ranch, but there is little doubt that the highly charged episode was threatening to become a political headache for the Nevada Democrat. The Bureau of Land Management is headed by former longtime Reid aide Neil Kornze, who was confirmed by the Senate as BLM director on Tuesday, just as federal authorities descended on the cattle ranch outside Mesquite, Nev. Mr. Kornze issued a statement Saturday saying that the bureau would return the cattle and withdraw its agents from the ranch

Democrats settle on fairness
issues hoping to avoid a repeat
of 2010 midterm disaster
Washington Post, by Wesley Lowery    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/13/2014 10:16:38 PM     Post Reply
On the defensive about their prospects in the midterm elections this fall, congressional Democrats have spent all of April savaging the Republican budget proposal, decrying the Koch brothers and championing a series of bills meant to ingratiate themselves to struggling middle-class voters. In promoting legislation that would extend unemployment benefits, increase the minimum wage and promote equal pay for women, the Democrats have declared themselves the party that will ensure a “fair shot” for all. Republicans, they insist, are the party of special interests. It has been a classic Washington messaging campaign for these partisan

For Hillary Clinton and Boeing,
a beneficial relationship
Washington Post, by Rosalind S. Helderman    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/13/2014 10:13:05 PM     Post Reply
On a trip to Moscow early in her tenure as secretary of state, Hillary Rodham Clinton played the role of international saleswoman, pressing Russian government officials to sign a multibillion-dollar deal to buy dozens of aircraft from Boeing. A month later, Clinton was in China, where she jubilantly announced that the aerospace giant would be writing a generous check to help resuscitate floundering U.S. efforts to host a pavilion at the upcoming World’s Fair. Boeing, she said, “has just agreed to double its contribution to $2 million.” Clinton did not point out that, to secure the donation, the State Department



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Kim Novak responds to post-
Oscars ridicule: ‘I was bullied.’

53 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Soroya Nadia McDonald    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/18/2014 5:02:40 AM     Post Reply
After presenting at the Academy Awards this year, Kim Novak didn’t want to leave her house. The Hitchcock screen siren, 81, was too humiliated to venture from her home near the Rogue River in Oregon. She read the cruel posts and Internet snark about her appearance, and it was just too much. “It got to me like it gets kids and teenagers,” she told the Associated Press. The “Vertigo” actress, considered one of the great beauties in her day, posted a note on her Facebook wall Thursday, acknowledging that she’d gotten fat injections in her face and addressing her halted

Analysis: Obama Celebrates
Eight Million ´Enrollments,´
Again Declares Debate ´Over´

44 replie(s)
Townhall, by Guy Benson    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/17/2014 8:56:28 PM     Post Reply
President Obama addressed the White House press corps today, announcing that with the final numbers in, Obamacare´s exchanges have attracted eight million sign-ups -- 35 percent of whom are "under the age of 35," he said. Several elements of his comments were misleading: (1) At first blush, the 35 percent stat is both significant and impressive. As recently as last month, the share of "young invincibles" signing up for plans was struggling in the 25 percent range, far short of the actuarial target of nearly 40 percent. A leap into the mid-30´s, while still shy of the goal, would constitute a major step, and would bode well for the risk pools'

The Folly Of The Bundy Ranch Rebellion
44 replie(s)
The Federalist, by Grace Olmstead    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/18/2014 4:21:46 AM     Post Reply
It’s the stuff of Westerns: a showdown on the desert plains, the big bad government against an underdog farmer. Though the story has only grabbed national headlines in the past several days, rancher Cliven Bundy has illegally grazed cattle on the Nevada land surrounding his farm for over 20 years. He hasn’t paid grazing fees since 1993, and refuses to renew the necessary grazing permit.(Snip)Rather than using the avenues and pathways presented to him, Bundy has staunchly declared his own law and allegiances. Unfortunately, reality doesn’t work this way. If only it did—we could rebel for paying stupid taxes, refuse to

Students Demand Acknowledgement of
Robert E. Lee´s ´Racist and Dishonorable Conduct´

42 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by AWR Hawkins    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/18/2014 12:35:28 PM     Post Reply
A group of seven multiracial Washington and Lee University (W&L) students are demanding the school remove all Confederate flags from campus and "acknowledge" General Robert E. Lee´s "dishonorable side." According to the Roanoke Times, "seven multiracial students, calling themselves ´The Committee,´" have also demanded the school "acknowledge and apologize for participating in chattel slavery." They want recognition of "Martin Luther King Jr. Day on the undergraduate campus" and an end to "neo-Confederates" marching across campus "to the Lee Chapel on Lee-Jackson Day." The students say they will "engage in civil disobedience" if their demands are not met by September 1st. They added: "The

Pelosi assists in Holy Week
foot-washing ritual

28 replie(s)
San Francisco Chronicle, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Harlowe- 4/18/2014 11:46:54 AM     Post Reply
To "honor the dignity and work of immigrants," Democratic House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi helps Bishop Marc Andrus wash the feet of two children Thursday at Saint John the Evangelist Episcopal Church in San Francisco. Pelosi also used the occasion to talk about passing HR15 - bipartisan immigration legislation that her office says would "reduce the deficit by nearly $1 trillion, secure our borders, unite our families, protect our workers and provide an earned pathway to citizenship." The Democratic leader´s ceremony coincides with Pope Francis´ similar ceremony in Rome to mark Holy Week.

Deadbeat on the Range
27 replie(s)
New York Times, by Timothy Eagan    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/18/2014 3:52:52 PM     Post Reply
Imagine a vendor on the National Mall, selling burgers and dogs, who hasn’t paid his rent in 20 years. He refuses to recognize his landlord, the National Park Service, as a legitimate authority. Every court has ruled against him, and fines have piled up. What’s more, the effluents from his food cart are having a detrimental effect on the spring grass in the capital. Would an armed posse come to his defense, aiming their guns at the park police? Would the lawbreaker get prime airtime on Fox News, breathless updates in the Drudge Report, a sympathetic ear from Tea Party Republicans?

Illinois Dems to offer $100 million in
taxpayer money to lure Obama library site

25 replie(s)
Investor´s Business Daily, by Andrew Malcolm    Original Article
Posted By: SurferLad- 4/18/2014 9:15:50 AM     Post Reply
First, the good news: We are close enough to the end of the Obama presidency for his crowd to talk about a presidential library. Now, the bad news: Obama´s retirement is still 1,008 days distant. Plenty of time though to round up the dough to build it somewhere. Figure they need Solyndra-style money, at least $500 million. The last two presidents – Bill Clinton and George W. Bush -- built their legacy edifices totally with private money. [Snip] However, Obama supporters have a different take. They think taxpayers should put up $100 million in public money for Obama´s library.


Post Reply   Close thread 720487





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~