A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: The pygmies vs. the Zulu warrior --
how Republicans missed a big
opportunity with Clinton
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
The pygmies vs. the Zulu warrior --
how Republicans missed a big
opportunity with Clinton

Fox News, by K.T. McFarland

Original Article

Posted By:KarenJ1, 1/24/2013 10:24:57 AM

Republican Senators and Congressmen thought they finally had a chance to cross-examine Secretary Clinton Wednesday on the Obama administration’s failure to provide adequate security for our Benghazi consulate. They thought they could grill her about what happened both before the attacks that killed our ambassador and three others and the failure to mount rescue operations once the attacks began. Instead, the Secretary turned the tables and chastised Congress for failing to provide adequate funding to protect our people.

Comments:
I agree that there were more pertinent questions they could have asked, however, the way it was set up to allow only five minutes of questioning was outrageous and was not conducive to receiving substantial information. Who made the decision to allow only five minutes? The Democrats?

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: snichols, 1/24/2013 10:57:10 AM     (No. 9136346)

It was disgusting to watch "turban Durban" do his routine in the questioning. What a fawning jerk.


Reply 2 - Posted by: 3XALADY, 1/24/2013 11:08:43 AM     (No. 9136371)

Herself! should be squeaky clean after all those tongue baths yesterday. Barf - arooni! All that, 7 hours, and still no answers. Are you going to let her get by with that? Thought so.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: kanphil, 1/24/2013 11:12:08 AM     (No. 9136382)

Those hearings were a total sellout, Republican and Democrat alike.


Reply 4 - Posted by: retiree, 1/24/2013 11:14:03 AM     (No. 9136387)


Why did she only testify for one day? Who approved the one day testimony and why only 5 minute limit? Stinks!


Reply 5 - Posted by: kahunavol, 1/24/2013 11:17:31 AM     (No. 9136396)

If you want to know why so many conservatives are deserting the R party, yesterday was exhibit A. If you don´t get it, you never will.


Reply 6 - Posted by: JAN, 1/24/2013 11:29:41 AM     (No. 9136432)

Clearly there is a mission to denigrate the republicans so they lose in the mid terms.

Are we going to buy into this bull or are we going to stand up for the republicans, who are NOT the enemy.

The ENEMY is in the white house.


Reply 7 - Posted by: chicodon, 1/24/2013 11:45:55 AM     (No. 9136487)

K.T. has got to know she´ll be accused of racism.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: TXknitter, 1/24/2013 11:55:58 AM     (No. 9136520)

Just as Brit Hume said yesterday, K.T. The R´s had a huge chance. She came prepared and the Dems had a strategy. The R´s were all over the place with their questioning. They deserve to be denigrated!


Reply 9 - Posted by: thelmalou, 1/24/2013 12:34:15 PM     (No. 9136632)

One after another they lined up to ask the same tired old questions about timelines and talking points and cable traffic. They spent more time grandstanding than grilling. They looked like a bunch of Pygmies going up against the great Zulu warrior.

Exactly, Ms. McF. I´ve been saying the whole time that McPain and Graham braying about when Susan Rice knew what is just silly. They should have questioned the ROOT of the issue, but AS ALWAYS, they contented themselves with appearing to do something while letting her waltz away. Morons.


Reply 10 - Posted by: DanvilleBill, 1/24/2013 1:27:20 PM     (No. 9136774)

If you ever had any question about the mental capabilities of today´s politicians, these two hearings should have provided some clarity.


Reply 11 - Posted by: kahunavol, 1/24/2013 2:54:09 PM     (No. 9136973)

If I had a dog that I had gotten to protect my house and he rolled over when my enemies came so they could give him a good scratch I would replace him. Same goes for congress people.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Penney, 1/24/2013 3:56:22 PM     (No. 9137106)

Excellent article. The dem pols answer to EVERYTHING is ALWAYS more taxpayers´ hard earned money in TAXES so THEY can decide how & where to spend it instead of us, regardless of how inappropriate that supposed, ´remedy,´ is to each specific situation. Dems no longer even attempt to engage in factual policy discussions, much less logical accountability inquiries, regarding issues of policy AND the results which they demonstrably produce, as in Benghazi!

The slippery, evasive Mrs. slick tried yet again yesterday to sidetrack responsibility & reform by again asking for more $$$. She sounded like a broken record. Her schtick is so old, over-used and irrelevant, how could anyone not recognize the con?

Yesterday´s scripted, ´Oranges & ´Apple-Annie,´ beltway show was tap dancing all around the stage once again. sigh


   

 



 

Post Reply   Close thread 720394




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"



Colorado sheriffs seek to
block new gun restrictions,
file lawsuit against state
Associated Press, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 10:12:54 PM     Post Reply
DENVER — Colorado sheriffs upset with gun restrictions adopted in the aftermath of last year’s mass shootings filed a federal lawsuit Friday, challenging the regulations as unconstitutional. The lawsuit involves sheriffs from 54 of Colorado’s 64 counties, most representing rural, gun-friendly areas of the state. The sheriffs say the new state laws violate Second Amendment protections that guarantee the right to keep and bear arms. Opponents are criticizing the lawsuit as political maneuvering. The filing targets Colorado laws that limit the size of ammunition magazines and expand background checks. The regulations

´We could lose everything´: Tea
Party groups prepare to sue IRS
Fox News, by Barnini Chakraborty    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 10:04:13 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – Jay Devereaux hadn’t paid much attention to the daily drumbeat of partisan politics in D.C. He wasn’t a Washington nerd, and didn’t know who said what during congressional hearings -- nor did he care. But when news broke that the government was using taxpayer money to bail out Wall Street banks, he started paying attention and didn’t like what he was hearing. So the Florida father and information technology specialist decided to form a group, Unite in Action, to educate people in his area about the issues, he said.

First Lady Expands Anti-
Obesity Campaign to Museums
Cybercast News Service, by Elizabeth Harrington    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 9:51:43 PM     Post Reply
First Lady Michelle Obama has expanded her anti-obesity campaign to museums, enlisting them to offer “healthy food options,” and change their menus. Mrs. Obama’s “Let’s Move!” initiative is now calling for museums, zoos, gardens, science and technology centers to “join the call to action,” to decrease obesity among children. The first lady is recruiting these institutions to join the “Let’s Move! Museums and Gardens” project because of their power to “influence real and sustained behavior change” on the eating habits of kids. “With their impressive reach and great potential for impact, museums and gardens can launch community

Congressman: IRS asked pro-
life group about ´the content
of their prayers´
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 9:26:42 PM     Post Reply
During a House Ways and Means Committee hearing today, Rep. Aaron Schock, R-Ill., grilled outgoing IRS commissioner Steven Miller about the IRS targeting a pro-life group in Iowa. "Their question, specifically asked from the IRS to the Coalition for Life of Iowa: ‘Please detail the content of the members of your organization’s prayers,’" Schock declared. “Would that be an inappropriate question to a 501 c3 applicant?” asked Schock. “The content of one’s prayers?” “It pains me to say I can’t speak to that one either,” Miller replied. After Schock pressed him further, Miller explained that although

   

 

  


 
Treasury Knew of I.R.S.
Inquiry in 2012, Official Says
New York Times, by Jonathan Weisman & Jeremy W. Peters    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 8:51:48 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON — Congressional Republicans, not resting with the Internal Revenue Service scandal, are moving to broaden the matter to an array of tax malfeasances and “intimidation tactics” they hope will ensnare the White House. Republican charges range from the clearly questionable to the seemingly specious, and they grow by the day. On Friday, lawmakers sought to tie the I.R.S. matter to the implementation of President Obama’s health care law, which will rely heavily on the agency. Whether they succeed holds significant ramifications for Mr. Obama,

HHS:´Telework´ Gives Gov´t
Employees More Time for ´Planning
and Preparing Healthy Meals´
Cybercast News Service, by Terence P. Jeffrey    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 8:40:41 PM     Post Reply
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services says it wants as many as 20 percent of its workers to "telework," use an "alternative work schedule," or do both, in order to "reduce green house gas emissions," decrease "employee stress," and give these government workers more time for "planning and preparing healthy meals." So says one of the HHS "performance measures" detailed in an appendix to the department´s latest strategic plan. HHS´s performance measure "4.D.05" says: "Increase the percent employees on telework or on Alternative Work Schedule." Telework means working from home via phone and computer.

Will real villains in IRS
scandal ever be punished?
Fox News, by Juan Williams    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 7:46:14 PM     Post Reply
Bloodletting, in the form of firings, dismissals, resignation, and expulsions, is a tribal rite in political Washington. It is most often used by the powerful on anyone less powerful as a symbolic sacrifice. Steven Miller, the now former acting commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, is the latest victim of ritual sacrifice. This week the Obama White House demanded his resignation to demonstrate the president’s “anger” at news that the IRS targeted conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status for added review and slow approval. Next, we’ll watch as Congress takes up the bloodletting knife.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Officials on Benghazi:
"We made mistakes,
but without malice"

52 replie(s)
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM     Post Reply
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.

Raindrops wash away
reeling O’s fake veneer

46 replie(s)
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM     Post Reply
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons

   

 



 
Watergate 2.0 -- why the
IRS scandal is far worse

44 replie(s)
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM     Post Reply
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,

Obama a new Nixon?
Oh, get serious.

43 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/16/2013 10:54:51 PM     Post Reply
STANDING BEFORE reporters Thursday, President Obama declined an invitation to compare the recent scandals weighing down his administration with those that forced President Nixon to resign in 1974. So allow us to do the work for him: There is no comparison. Nixon, in a series of crimes that collectively came to be known as Watergate, directed from the White House and Justice Department a concerted campaign against those he perceived as political enemies, in the process subverting the FBI, the IRS, other government agencies and the electoral process to his nefarious purposes. Mr. Obama has done nothing of the kind.

Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting
Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.

41 replie(s)
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM     Post Reply
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,

Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
41 replie(s)
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM     Post Reply
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part

Rep. Issa subpoenas Benghazi
auditor Thomas Pickering

38 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington DC], by Julian Pecquet    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/17/2013 3:53:45 PM     Post Reply
The lawmaker leading the charge to investigate the Benghazi terror attack on Friday subpoenaed the co-author of a report that slammed the State Department but didn´t interview Hillary Clinton. House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) formally demanded that retired ambassador Thomas Pickering submit to being deposed by the committee next Thursday. The subpoena comes in the wake of a series of acrimonious public exchanges this week between the two men. Issa didn´t issue a subpoena to former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Michael Mullen, who co-authored the Benghazi report with Pickering.

   

Post Reply   Close thread 720394





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~