A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC



        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


  Topic: Panetta opens combat
roles to women
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Panetta opens combat
roles to women

Associated Press, by Staff

Original Article

Posted By:Judy W., 1/23/2013 3:53:54 PM

Senior defense officials say Pentagon chief Leon Panetta is removing the military´s ban on women serving in combat, opening hundreds of thousands of front-line positions and potentially elite commando jobs after more than a decade at war. The groundbreaking move recommended by the Joint Chiefs of Staff overturns a 1994 rule banning women from being assigned to smaller ground combat units. Panetta´s decision gives the military services until January 2016 to seek special exceptions if they believe any positions must remain closed to women.

Comments:
Good grief, what are we coming to? (That´s the whole article.)

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: yuban, 1/23/2013 3:58:50 PM     (No. 9134868)

Send HRC to the front lines NOW.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Susieq1, 1/23/2013 4:01:10 PM     (No. 9134875)

Foolish!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: aasilver, 1/23/2013 4:01:52 PM     (No. 9134876)

Our first line of defense -- Gays and women.

Sounds like a plan -- to destroy the USA.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: fhancock, 1/23/2013 4:06:41 PM     (No. 9134892)

When do they sign up for Selective Service ...if they are good enough to go into the infantry they should be eligible if and when a draft comes...otherwise they are STILL second-class soldiers...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: wsdiego, 1/23/2013 4:06:45 PM     (No. 9134893)

They won´t last long on an Amtrac!
Semper Fi The Dirty Bird, Marine Amtracs

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Johnny Angle, 1/23/2013 4:07:22 PM     (No. 9134895)

How do now they justify Selective Service for men only?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: JoniTx, 1/23/2013 4:08:50 PM     (No. 9134899)

Doesn´t Congress have a voice on this decision? Just curious...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: GOPinTN, 1/23/2013 4:13:53 PM     (No. 9134907)

Rarely do we find men who willingly engage in hard, solid thinking. There is an almost universal quest for easy answers and half-baked solutions. Nothing pains some people more than having to think.- Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: TXknitter, 1/23/2013 4:16:19 PM     (No. 9134912)

A lot of women say fine, go for it. BUT no whining, special treatment or lawsuits if you get your body parts blown to smithereens.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: Coy860, 1/23/2013 4:16:32 PM     (No. 9134914)

ANY woman in combat better damned well be qualified to carry my grandson to safety if he is wounded in combat. IF not, get OUT.
This is a stupid move.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: Not your typical New Yorker, 1/23/2013 4:16:57 PM     (No. 9134917)

The democrats continue to turn our military into politically correct mush.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Attila DiMedici, 1/23/2013 4:20:30 PM     (No. 9134924)

#7, that was my though as well. I thought that the ban on women in combat was legislated. However, I just did some research and such is apparently not the case.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: on fire, 1/23/2013 4:30:36 PM     (No. 9134942)

Yep, the guys on the front line love nothing better than squandering time carrying gear for tired females or helping them keep up.

Panetta is ridiculous.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: RIsailor, 1/23/2013 4:30:56 PM     (No. 9134946)

The Marine Corps runs a combat school for new Marine officers and opened the school to women last year. Several tried out and flunked. No more women lieutenants are applying.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: tulipwood, 1/23/2013 4:34:55 PM     (No. 9134952)

Say good-by to men. Men will not compete with women, nor will they compete against a culture that has become so repulsively feminized. Ladies, you are on your own.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: lazyman, 1/23/2013 4:38:00 PM     (No. 9134959)

We could have used them in Nam. We still would have lost but the year would have gone faster for me.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: Trust No One, 1/23/2013 4:42:55 PM     (No. 9134969)

How I see it.

Next step - required to sign for Selective Service.

Wars in Africa and Defending Japan from China

Need for more soliders

Draft reinstated

Call up Men AND Women to fight global wars to inrich bankers, military complex and to TRY to keep global economy from crashing DOWN into FIAT oblivion.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: stablemoney, 1/23/2013 4:44:27 PM     (No. 9134973)

The chiefs will stand far in the rear while they are sent forward for cannon fodder.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: King of all trolls, 1/23/2013 4:46:01 PM     (No. 9134977)

There goes chivalry. Why should a man bother to endure what he does in the service if some chick can do the job for him. Stay home. Play video games. What´s the point?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 20 - Posted by: whyyeseyec, 1/23/2013 4:48:49 PM     (No. 9134982)

Send only women into combat. Men have carried the load far too long. If we `need` more women in govn and business then we need more women in combat.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: Scribelus, 1/23/2013 4:49:22 PM     (No. 9134983)

The women involved are volunteers, just like the men. Time will tell if the nation can bear larger female casualty lists.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 22 - Posted by: TexasHillCountry, 1/23/2013 5:06:11 PM     (No. 9135000)

A VERY BAD IDEA.

Not what casualties the public can bear, but the real, and known, loss in combat efficiency? The biggest part of combat for the front-line troops is hard, brutal, dirty work that makes physical, emotional, and psychological demands that have to be experienced to be understood.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: dittohead, 1/23/2013 5:11:34 PM     (No. 9135008)

True Confession: NO ONE would want to depend on ME on the front lines!!! VERY FOOLISH MOVE!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 24 - Posted by: 6079 Smith, W, 1/23/2013 5:12:00 PM     (No. 9135009)

Oh, dear! Another opportunity for us to be beat over the head with "the first woman in combat", "the first black woman in combat", "the first transgendered woman in combat", "the first latina woman in combat", "the first woman killed in combat", "the first black woman killed in combat"...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 25 - Posted by: fayebeck, 1/23/2013 5:14:48 PM     (No. 9135012)

I say only women who support abortion or have had one thereby qualifying them for killing, be put on the front lines. Also just a piggish comment from a pig. Seems women are the only "minority" who lobbied to give up special status. Of course that special status would be considering them "ladies". BUT today´s slutty women would make great soldiers. You won "ladies" now go for it.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 26 - Posted by: HistoryBuff, 1/23/2013 5:19:36 PM     (No. 9135019)

Whoppee! The Academics have ruled!

The sign of equality is that now women can become trained killers.


Lets see how that works out.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 27 - Posted by: Freeloader, 1/23/2013 5:23:07 PM     (No. 9135028)

And from the foxholes, torpedo rooms, tactical command posts, bivouac areas and boondocks around the globe, the new "battle cry" will be heard..."Come on baba, you drive me crazy...Goodness gracious great balls of fire!"

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 28 - Posted by: msjena, 1/23/2013 5:25:34 PM     (No. 9135034)

This is progress? Well, I suppose if you think there are too many people already it is.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 29 - Posted by: Packard Man, 1/23/2013 5:25:45 PM     (No. 9135035)

Interestingly revealed on the day Hillary goes before congress.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 30 - Posted by: chumley, 1/23/2013 5:29:11 PM     (No. 9135040)

I served with a lot of women during my time in. The vast majority did their regular jobs exceptionally well.
When we went into the field or on a remote was another matter entirely. Very few had the strength or stamina to do the work. Their very presence created resentment as someone else had to do two jobs.
Plus, they create drama just by being there. Romances develop all the time, and the last thing some lonely GI needs is to see someone else playing high school lovey games. I saw it on every assignment and every deployment.
This is a bad idea, which means it will be embraced by those who wish to further degrade our military.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 31 - Posted by: semperparatus, 1/23/2013 5:30:08 PM     (No. 9135042)

Of course this is a bad idea, another moronic event in the life of liberals and their followers. Ask anyone aboard ship what they think of this idea.

#27 - I believe the United States has already passed the test when it comes to women killers. A disgusting topic to be sure, but, are we not at the 55 million abortion mark now?

55 million... more than the number of deaths (conservative number) in World War II. Hitler and Stalin would be proud.

Semper Paratus

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 32 - Posted by: viking diver, 1/23/2013 5:32:18 PM     (No. 9135046)

unbelievable and simply stupid, panetta playing PC with the very lives that men will give their lives to defend.
Are women ready to be raped repeatedly by the enemy before being killed.
some of the villages that were friendly and provided security and food to us in Nam, sometimes would be overrun if found out and it wasn´t pretty what was left.
what a way to ruin a combat effective squad by putting a woman in the mix, will she be able to carry 65 lbs of equipment or more while on foot, walk long distances. I remember the Air Force in its infinite wisdom once put a woman with the 5 of us on a mountain top for a remote 6 month tour, we had to give up space for her privacy, and set aside time for the shows just for her, and she still ended up getting pregnant and I don´t think her husband was too pleased by that either.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 33 - Posted by: cav160, 1/23/2013 5:57:57 PM     (No. 9135086)

Well since we are on a PC role lets have a couple of all female Infantry Battalions, commanded by first female Battalion Commander! Throw them into Horn of Africa to show how effective they can be.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 34 - Posted by: FL_Absentee_Voter, 1/23/2013 5:58:42 PM     (No. 9135089)

Sea duty has been opened up to women since 1978 and it seems to be working our real well: more than half of the commanding officers relieved of their commands last year were fired due to some form of sexual misconduct.

Just saw Howitzer Explosion Guy ("Party on, Wayne!") on the cafeteria flat screen - he´s all giddy over the news and had out-of-the-closet helo pilot tammy duckworth on as his guest. Finally, something brings a smile to her face. Up until now, she´s always worn a frown - I didn´t know if it was because she´s merely another angry lesbian or that she lost both legs while fighting in George Bush´s War.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 35 - Posted by: Magic8Ball, 1/23/2013 6:01:09 PM     (No. 9135094)

War against women.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 36 - Posted by: oldsfc, 1/23/2013 6:05:08 PM     (No. 9135102)

The strongest women is still weaker than the average male. I would love to see Mary hump a 50lb ruck. Hah!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 37 - Posted by: Antiquegolf, 1/23/2013 6:06:23 PM     (No. 9135104)

Reply 26, any population control secondary to abortion and other factors is more than canceled by the illegal alien invasion. The population of the USA is increasing at the rate of a 3rd world country. Almost all of the growth is due to immigration. And it´s not just hispanics. The average muslim "family" in USA has 7 children.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 38 - Posted by: mythman, 1/23/2013 6:06:50 PM     (No. 9135107)

It´s been tried before in other armies. As I recall, besides the strength issue there are two more: 1) the maiming of women soldiers in combat has a devastating effect on all present 2) women decide to opt out by getting pregnant in considerable numbers.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 39 - Posted by: Alpha91c, 1/23/2013 6:07:06 PM     (No. 9135109)

Mark my words, this will not end well. PC run amok.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 40 - Posted by: anonymous, 1/23/2013 6:08:02 PM     (No. 9135112)

Well, if this is to be then the Obama administration should immediately require that all young women register for the draft.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 41 - Posted by: Ida Lil, 1/23/2013 6:14:29 PM     (No. 9135120)

Oh My the yang factor at work Obama style. He voices all out protection for women while his minion declares women will be in combat.
Of course the protection from Obe is only in matters of lady parts in political sexual terms while pretending those parts are not included in death or dismemberment in combat.
Like everything else in his governing agenda open mouth stick in foot then cram in the opposite one.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 42 - Posted by: ScarletPimpernel, 1/23/2013 6:21:07 PM     (No. 9135138)

And earlier this afternoon, Valerie Jarrett tweeted, "If there´s one thing we should all agree on, it´s protecting women from violence. Congress needs to pass the Violence Against Women Act." (You can access the link on Drudge.) How screwed up is this Administration??

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 43 - Posted by: HistoryBuff, 1/23/2013 6:34:00 PM     (No. 9135159)

Good.

Now make all 18 year old women of America REGISTER FOR THE DRAFT.

It´ll get reeaaallll quiet.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 44 - Posted by: Penney, 1/23/2013 6:48:43 PM     (No. 9135186)

Poster is exactly right. This is 0bama´s war against women, indeed the entire dem party´s decades-old war against women. The radical militant lefty/libs have betrayed femininity and demeaned masculinity since the 1960s! Their statist policies have fractured the American family unit over the past 4 decades. ...This will NOT work out well.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 45 - Posted by: Rafter, 1/23/2013 6:55:20 PM     (No. 9135190)

#1 and #3...

Remember that old bromide...
"kill two birds with one stone"... ?

Well...
Send Hill-err-ee-ass Herself to combat...
and you got gay women at the front!

Pretty certain she´ll come out as gay before the next election.
Wants all those votes.
Nothing to stop her this time.

Probably plans to marry Jodie Foster in the White House in 2017.
That is...
If she survives her combat role.
Army boots and a camo pants suit.
Trendy.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 46 - Posted by: BaseballFan, 1/23/2013 7:05:58 PM     (No. 9135204)

I envision that this will be as "successful" as putting women on Navy ships. Until they decide (at the last minute) they don´t want to deploy.
Then some poor GI is going to find out he´s being FORCED to do back-to-back deployments.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 47 - Posted by: OC Jackson, 1/23/2013 7:12:00 PM     (No. 9135210)

Lousy idea. One poster talked about a 50 lb. rucksack. More realistically, try a 75 lb. load.

Register all 18 year-old females for the draft. Those who are "selected" for motor pool specialties, are required to change tires on their own. Those selected for the Artillery must be capable of loading an 8" howitzer. The rounds weigh 200 lbs, by the way.

I´ve served with females, officer and enlisted. In the office, they were fine soldiers. The problem came with their relationships (inevitable) with their male counterparts. Young women and men, thrown together in stressful environments will become sexually involved. Problems will range from jealousy to physical conflict.

This is a stupid, PC idea.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 48 - Posted by: dr fate, 1/23/2013 7:27:51 PM     (No. 9135229)

Hey, if Demi Moore could do it so well in a movie, then what´s the big deal?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 49 - Posted by: Bubby, 1/23/2013 8:00:18 PM     (No. 9135269)

This is just another attack by Democrats to destroy the greatest army on earth. First gays and now women. This is purposeful and destructive. I would not go into combat with women period! I don´t care what anyone thinks of this post I wouldn´t do it. It won´t be long before all the physical strength requirements will be revised downward to accomodate women. The result will be more combat deaths to be pc. It´s discusting what the Democrats are doing to this country!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 50 - Posted by: bighambone, 1/24/2013 12:56:43 AM     (No. 9135680)

The only reason that the liberals are able to run with such a ludicrous policy change is that only about 1% of the US population ever serves in the military these days. The percentage that make up the army and marine ground combat units that close with the enemy during ground combat is much less then that 1%. The rest of the about 99% of the population knows little about the military and it´s traditions, or the extreme hardships that marines and soldiers actually face and experience during sustained ground combat operations.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 51 - Posted by: broken01, 1/24/2013 11:47:58 AM     (No. 9136494)

This may look good on paper in the liberal halls of the WH, Pentagon, ACLU, and college campi but being a Navy veteran of 20yrs I´m here tell you this will blow up the dopey liberal´s faces. How you might ask? The first time that ANY terrorist group gets their filthy hands on a female servicemember and uses her to either make her give it up(secrets folks not what your thinking)or tortures her to make some other captive spill the classifed beans. The blowback would make the above institutions rethink this ridiculous idea. Mark my words that will happen.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 720286




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Judy W."

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Judy W."



Common Core´s Dirtiest Trick:
Dividing Parents and Children
American Thinker, by Bruce Deitrick Price    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 4/16/2014 7:23:37 AM     Post Reply
When you look back at New Math (ca. 1965) and Reform Math (ca. 1990), one of the most striking and persistent features was that parents could not understand the homework their children brought home. Mystified parents were trying to advise mystified children. The parents, presumably the wise members of the society, were helpless to say anything useful when confronted by the weird complexities of “reform” math, which has now been rolled forward into Common Core. Here is a commonplace horror story that can stand in for millions of others: “When Mike and Camille Chudzinski tried to help their son with

Chinese Thunder God Herb
Works as Well as Pain Therapy
Bloomberg, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 4/16/2014 7:03:44 AM     Post Reply
A centuries-old Chinese medical herb known as “thunder god vine” eased the pain and swelling of rheumatoid arthritis as effectively as the commonly prescribed methotrexate, a study showed. In a trial of 207 patients in China, those who took extracts of the herb showed slightly more improvement than those on methotrexate alone; combining the two boosted efficacy significantly over methotrexate alone. The study appears in the Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases published by BMJ, formerly known as the British Medical Journal. While traditional Chinese medicine has been practiced for hundreds of years, research into its benefits compared with today’s standard

Infants ´unable to use
toy building blocks´
due to iPad addiction
Telegraph [UK], by Graeme Paton    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 4/16/2014 6:52:13 AM     Post Reply
Rising numbers of infants lack the motor skills needed to play with building blocks because of an “addiction” to tablet computers and smartphones, according to teachers. Many children aged just three or four can “swipe a screen” but have little or no dexterity in their fingers after spending hours glued to iPads, it was claimed. Members of the Association of Teachers and Lecturers also warned how some older children were unable to complete traditional pen and paper exams because their memory had been eroded by overexposure to screen-based technology. They called on parents to crackdown on tablet computer use and even turn off

Regulation Nation: Breweries fight back
against new government grain rules
Fox News, by Garrett Tenney    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 4/15/2014 8:31:39 PM     Post Reply
A fight is brewing between American beer makers and the federal government over happy hour ... for cows. For centuries, brewers have given or sold the leftover grain from the brewing process to local ranchers and dairy farmers for cattle feed. But new regulations proposed by the Food and Drug Administration threaten to end that relationship. "The whole brewing community was shocked about it," said Josh Deth, co-owner of Revolution Brewing in Chicago, Ill. Deth, whose title is "Chairman of the Party," says it´s always been a great deal for both sides. The ranchers get the grain, and the brewers get those leftovers

The EPA´s Science Problem
FrontPage, by Arnold Ahlert    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 4/15/2014 1:01:55 PM     Post Reply
In a stunning admission, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Gina McCarthy revealed to House Science, Space and Technology Committee chairman Lamar Smith (R-TX) that the agency neither possesses, nor can produce, all of the scientific data used to justify the rules and regulations they have imposed on Americans via the Clean Air Act. In short, science has been trumped by the radical environmentalist agenda. The admission follows the issuance of a subpoena by the full Committee last August. It was engendered by two years of EPA stonewalling, apparently aimed at preventing the raw data cited by EPA as the scientific foundation

Will Putin Fall Victim to One
of History´s Historic Blunders?
Foreign Policy, by David C. Gompert & Hans Binnendijk    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 4/15/2014 12:47:33 PM     Post Reply
As eastern Ukraine descends into a state of chaos and seeming anarchy, the specter of an invasion by Russia ticks ever upward. President Vladimir Putin has demanded a neutral and federated Ukraine, one that would be vulnerable to the Kremlin´s coercion and might one day be partitioned. But with masked, armed pro-Russian demonstrators occupying government buildings in the eastern cities of Donetsk, Luhansk, and Kharkiv -- and tens of thousands of Russian troops just across the border -- the ante has been upped considerable. But for all the justifiable fear that Putin is contemplating sending Russian troops into Ukraine, doing

Aiming High
Creators Syndicate, by Mona Charen    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 4/15/2014 8:52:54 AM     Post Reply
There´s an MRCTV video circulating on the Internet that features a man with a microphone asking college students in Washington, D.C., to name just one member of the United States Senate. At least half a dozen are stumped. (Snip) We can all have a good laugh at the expense of the ignorant kids, but, of course, if they are truly undereducated (and these surveys can exaggerate), it´s largely the fault of our schools. It´s nice to be reminded, from time to time, about what good schools and good teachers can achieve. In McLean, Va., a suburb of the District of Columbia, Langley



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Megyn Kelly and the
Sandberg Head Shaker

47 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Richard F. Miniter    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/15/2014 9:16:05 AM     Post Reply
Megyn Kelly’s "Kelly File" is a great news show. She’s incisive, informed and customarily handles the toughest guest with aplomb. But her lengthy interview of Facebook C.O.O. Sheryl Sandberg about her second book in the Lean In series Lean In: For Graduates was a head shaker. Amazing that she of all people allowed Sandberg to restring the same old, same old, shamed, and shopworn feminist myths about women and girls and then jangle it in front of her viewing audience like something new out of the box. Indeed Kelly all but genuflected in front of this woman. Kept her on thru

Why You Should Be Sympathetic
Toward Cliven Bundy

44 replie(s)
Powerline, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Toledo- 4/15/2014 8:40:58 AM     Post Reply
On Saturday, I wrote about the standoff at Bundy Ranch. That post drew a remarkable amount of traffic, even though, as I wrote then, I had not quite decided what to make of the story. Since then, I have continued to study the facts and have drawn some conclusions. Here they are. First, it must be admitted that legally, Bundy doesn’t have a leg to stand on. The Bureau of Land Management has been charging him grazing fees since the early 1990s, which he has refused to pay. Further, BLM has issued orders limiting the area on which Bundy’s cows can

Has Rush Limbaugh Finally
Reached the End Of The Road?

43 replie(s)
Forbes Magazine, by Rick Ungar    Original Article
Posted By: EveningStar- 4/16/2014 7:24:05 PM     Post Reply
Like him or hate him, there is no disputing that Rush Limbaugh’s very special brand of mixing right-wing politics with his flare for entertainment has produced one of the most successful radio programs in the medium’s long history. Whatever the burning political question of the day, millions of Americans have relished the opportunity to tune into Rush’s program, knowing that he would quickly take that hot potato, throw a few gallons of verbal kerosene into the mix and elevate the matter into a five alarm fire with a just a few well-chosen words spoken in the style only Rush Limbaugh could

Biden Tells Boston Bombing
Survivors, ´It Was Worth It´ (Video)

41 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Instablog, by Debra Heine    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/15/2014 9:28:18 PM     Post Reply
Less than a minute into his speech at the Boston marathon bombing memorial on Tuesday, Vice President Joe Biden went tragically off script and told the crowd of Boston bombing survivors that "it was worth it." After expressing how impressed he was with the tribute, he said somberly, "let me say to those ´quote survivors,´ my God, you have survived and you have soared. It was worth it. I mean this sincerely - just to hear each of you speak. You´re truly, truly inspiring." The audience sat in stunned silence until Biden declared, "I´ve never heard anything so beautiful than

Casual marijuana use linked with
brain abnormalities, study finds

40 replie(s)
Fox News, by Loren Grush    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/15/2014 6:12:53 PM     Post Reply
Casual marijuana use may come with some not-so-casual side effects. For the first time ever, researchers at Northwestern University have analyzed the relationship between casual use of marijuana and brain changes – and found that young adults who used cannabis just once or twice a week showed significant abnormalities in two important brain structures. The study’s findings, to be published Wednesday in the Journal of Neuroscience, are similar to those of past research linking chronic, long-term marijuana use with mental illness and changes in brain development. Dr. Hans Breiter, co-senior study author, said he was inspired to look at the effects of casual

Which Actor Portrays The
Best James Bond?

38 replie(s)
American Spectator, by Jonah Goldberg and Taki Theodoracopulos    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/16/2014 11:20:22 AM     Post Reply
Look, everyone loves Sean Connery, particularly Sean Connery. That’s why he plays Sean Connery in every movie he’s in. People love that Scottish brogue so much, they don’t mind that he has it when he plays Juan Sánchez Villa-Lobos Ramírez, an immortal Spaniard in Highlander. The guy even won an Oscar for playing an Irish cop with a Scottish accent. Talk about sexist double standards: Meryl Streep has to master foreign dialects to get her golden statuettes. Connery just has to show up on time. In economics you devalue a currency by printing too much of it. In film you

White babies just 15 months old show racial
bias when picking playmates, study found

34 replie(s)
Daily Mail (U.K.), by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/15/2014 10:23:35 PM     Post Reply
Toddlers show racial bias when picking playmates, a study reveals. They also take account of how fairly others behave. Researchers tested the reaction of white 15-month-olds as toys were distributed. Two white adults divided the toys, one equally and the other unequally. Seventy per cent of the toddlers chose to play with the researcher who distributed the toys fairly. But in a second test, when one researcher favoured a white recipient over an Asian one, they picked the ‘fair’ researcher less often, the journal Frontiers in Psychology reports. And the babies are more likely to help those who share the same ethnicity, which is known as


Post Reply   Close thread 720286





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~