|
|
| |
Topic: Pomp(ousness) and Circumstance:
Inauguration 2013 counter-programming |
Pomp(ousness) and Circumstance:
Inauguration 2013 counter-programming
Washington Times, by Eric Golub
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:KarenJ1, 1/20/2013 8:54:11 AM
|
| LOS ANGELES — Many people will be glued to the television watching President Barack Obama celebrate his second and final inauguration. This begs a simple question. Does Obama really need an inauguration? Isn´t his entire presidency, in fact his entire existence, a celebration of himself celebrating himself? Given that he will say the same exact things again in a week or so at his 2013 State of the Useless address, it is unnecessary to sit through day 1,461 of the Obama 2008 Inauguration. Many of us would sooner watch reruns of the Royal Wedding of Prince Charles
|
Comments:
Mr. Golub says what so many of us are feeling. He´s spot on!
|
 
Reply 1 - Posted by:
dwillyc, 1/20/2013 9:09:38 AM (No. 9127727)
I have to wash my hair that day.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
EnsignO´Toole, 1/20/2013 9:19:06 AM (No. 9127746)
We need more articles by this fellow during the next dismal four years. Good for the Washington Times for printing it.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
lakerman1, 1/20/2013 9:26:00 AM (No. 9127763)
-
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
lakerman1, 1/20/2013 9:28:22 AM (No. 9127766)
The snotty Chelsea Clinton was on C span yesterday, as part of the inaugural festivities, and talked at great length about her maternal grandmother, a sainted woman, who knitted clothing for the poor....
I didn´t hear Chelsea speak one word about President Hologram. Not one word. But I did switch channels so that my tv set would not blow up, carrying the face of chelsea.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
grampagasman, 1/20/2013 9:43:56 AM (No. 9127796)
I´ll watch football instead.
GO NINERS!
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
VeteranAmerican, 1/20/2013 9:44:05 AM (No. 9127797)
Every time big ears or minnie the moocher show up on my big screen I quickly change the channel so I don´t throw something at the screen. They really look bad on a 65" screen.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Pros7767, 1/20/2013 9:45:26 AM (No. 9127805)
I´ll be reading a good book, although I may tune in briefly to see how hideous the Wookie looks. Her lack of style is pathetic,
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
earlybird, 1/20/2013 10:00:46 AM (No. 9127852)
Way to go, Eric!
Once we get through Monday, we will not have to hear about Obama again until his next major "historic" and "unprecedented" announcement about another non-achievement. This will most likely occur on Tuesday, which is day 1,462 of his inauguration. MSNBC as always will be providing blanket coverage.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
KanCreeper, 1/20/2013 10:35:17 AM (No. 9127915)
THE OBAMA ´Inauguration´/ Imaculation (?) is probably nothing more than a case of Self-Gratification?.
Surely, a waste of time and money to honor someone who is a malignant narcissist.
The Media will massage the event with grandiose verbiage, and tight crowd shots.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
jrldev, 1/20/2013 10:44:11 AM (No. 9127941)
Well, the way things are developing since November´s election this could not be "his secondf and FINAL inaguration". Somehow I recall the situation in Gemany in the beginning of Hitler´s "Reign" over that nation.Not very many people from that era are around today but recorded history could give us more details. Take time and read about it. Never doubt that History Does Repeat Itself.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Udanja99, 1/20/2013 10:56:48 AM (No. 9127968)
Don´t torture yourself that way, #7. Just wait until his evening and go to michellesmirror.com for a hilarious wrap up.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
farmwife, 1/20/2013 11:15:46 AM (No. 9128006)
Best line of the article, #8!
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Roll Tide, 1/20/2013 11:16:52 AM (No. 9128009)
Ah, but will Arietha Franklin show up in another wild get-up? I´ll wait for the pictures. At least George, Sr. and Bar have good reasons for not attending this year. --And too bad that some unbelievable blizzard isn´t in the forcast. It´s a good occasion for that Hell to freeze over.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
jackie, 1/20/2013 11:18:12 AM (No. 9128013)
It will be way to frigid here to go out and about...so I am going to declare it a Netflix day at my house...
I would rather walk through fire than watch that lying piece of crap and his ghetto witch wife celebrating the stupidity of the fools who voted for more welfare..
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
ricktutt, 1/20/2013 11:47:36 AM (No. 9128078)
Will not be watching
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
a man over thirty, 1/20/2013 11:52:22 AM (No. 9128087)
Thank goodness we have DVRs and Netflix and such as TBS and TNT and ESPN so that we are not force-fed Obama 24/7.
In fact, in his first term, I have not caught more than a couple of fleeting images of the Obamas nor heard his sing-song voice more than a few words at a time as I have become adept at instant channel-changing.
The One can be avoided - it just takes practice and hair-trigger reaction time.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Penney, 1/20/2013 2:47:56 PM (No. 9128437)
We will be watching Netflix fims that we haven´t had time for. This will actually be the first time we haven´t watched an inauguration since they began televising them. sigh
Sometimes it is best to shun agitators.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
M Stuart, 1/20/2013 8:30:31 PM (No. 9128894)
I´ve been watching the things stacked up on my TiVo.
Can´t stand the slobbering over 0bamessiah.
My spell check doesn´t even complain any more over "0bamessiah". hmmm
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
|
Colorado sheriffs seek to
block new gun restrictions,
file lawsuit against state
|
|
Associated Press, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 10:12:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
DENVER — Colorado sheriffs upset with gun restrictions adopted in the aftermath of last year’s mass shootings filed a federal lawsuit Friday, challenging the regulations as unconstitutional. The lawsuit involves sheriffs from 54 of Colorado’s 64 counties, most representing rural, gun-friendly areas of the state. The sheriffs say the new state laws violate Second Amendment protections that guarantee the right to keep and bear arms. Opponents are criticizing the lawsuit as political maneuvering. The filing targets Colorado laws that limit the size of ammunition magazines and expand background checks. The regulations
|
´We could lose everything´: Tea
Party groups prepare to sue IRS
|
|
Fox News, by Barnini Chakraborty
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 10:04:13 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – Jay Devereaux hadn’t paid much attention to the daily drumbeat of partisan politics in D.C. He wasn’t a Washington nerd, and didn’t know who said what during congressional hearings -- nor did he care. But when news broke that the government was using taxpayer money to bail out Wall Street banks, he started paying attention and didn’t like what he was hearing. So the Florida father and information technology specialist decided to form a group, Unite in Action, to educate people in his area about the issues, he said.
|
First Lady Expands Anti-
Obesity Campaign to Museums
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Elizabeth Harrington
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 9:51:43 PM
Post Reply
|
|
First Lady Michelle Obama has expanded her anti-obesity campaign to museums, enlisting them to offer “healthy food options,” and change their menus. Mrs. Obama’s “Let’s Move!” initiative is now calling for museums, zoos, gardens, science and technology centers to “join the call to action,” to decrease obesity among children. The first lady is recruiting these institutions to join the “Let’s Move! Museums and Gardens” project because of their power to “influence real and sustained behavior change” on the eating habits of kids. “With their impressive reach and great potential for impact, museums and gardens can launch community
|
| |
|
Congressman: IRS asked pro-
life group about ´the content
of their prayers´
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 9:26:42 PM
Post Reply
|
|
During a House Ways and Means Committee hearing today, Rep. Aaron Schock, R-Ill., grilled outgoing IRS commissioner Steven Miller about the IRS targeting a pro-life group in Iowa. "Their question, specifically asked from the IRS to the Coalition for Life of Iowa: ‘Please detail the content of the members of your organization’s prayers,’" Schock declared. “Would that be an inappropriate question to a 501 c3 applicant?” asked Schock. “The content of one’s prayers?” “It pains me to say I can’t speak to that one either,” Miller replied. After Schock pressed him further, Miller explained that although
|
Treasury Knew of I.R.S.
Inquiry in 2012, Official Says
|
|
New York Times, by Jonathan Weisman & Jeremy W. Peters
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 8:51:48 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON — Congressional Republicans, not resting with the Internal Revenue Service scandal, are moving to broaden the matter to an array of tax malfeasances and “intimidation tactics” they hope will ensnare the White House. Republican charges range from the clearly questionable to the seemingly specious, and they grow by the day. On Friday, lawmakers sought to tie the I.R.S. matter to the implementation of President Obama’s health care law, which will rely heavily on the agency. Whether they succeed holds significant ramifications for Mr. Obama,
|
HHS:´Telework´ Gives Gov´t
Employees More Time for ´Planning
and Preparing Healthy Meals´
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Terence P. Jeffrey
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 8:40:41 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services says it wants as many as 20 percent of its workers to "telework," use an "alternative work schedule," or do both, in order to "reduce green house gas emissions," decrease "employee stress," and give these government workers more time for "planning and preparing healthy meals." So says one of the HHS "performance measures" detailed in an appendix to the department´s latest strategic plan. HHS´s performance measure "4.D.05" says: "Increase the percent employees on telework or on Alternative Work Schedule." Telework means working from home via phone and computer.
|
Will real villains in IRS
scandal ever be punished?
|
|
Fox News, by Juan Williams
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 7:46:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Bloodletting, in the form of firings, dismissals, resignation, and expulsions, is a tribal rite in political Washington. It is most often used by the powerful on anyone less powerful as a symbolic sacrifice. Steven Miller, the now former acting commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, is the latest victim of ritual sacrifice. This week the Obama White House demanded his resignation to demonstrate the president’s “anger” at news that the IRS targeted conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status for added review and slow approval. Next, we’ll watch as Congress takes up the bloodletting knife.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Raindrops wash away
reeling O’s fake veneer
|
|
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons
|
Officials on Benghazi:
"We made mistakes,
but without malice"
|
|
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.
|
Obama a new Nixon?
Oh, get serious.
|
|
Washington Post, by Editorial
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/16/2013 10:54:51 PM
Post Reply
|
|
STANDING BEFORE reporters Thursday, President Obama declined an invitation to compare the recent scandals weighing down his administration with those that forced President Nixon to resign in 1974. So allow us to do the work for him: There is no comparison. Nixon, in a series of crimes that collectively came to be known as Watergate, directed from the White House and Justice Department a concerted campaign against those he perceived as political enemies, in the process subverting the FBI, the IRS, other government agencies and the electoral process to his nefarious purposes. Mr. Obama has done nothing of the kind.
|
Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting
Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.
|
|
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,
|
NBC´s Todd Warns: If GOP
Investigates Obama Scandals,
´The Voters Will Punish Them´
|
|
Newsbusters, by Kyle Drennen
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/16/2013 1:51:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
On Thursday´s NBC Today, in a desperate attempt to deflect from the scandals engulfing the Obama administration, co-host Savannah Guthrie wondered: "I read a headline yesterday that said Republicans see blood in the water. That they see a president who´s very vulnerable politically. Is there a danger that they will overreach?" Chief White House correspondent Chuck Todd agreed with the slanted premise: "There is. I mean, that´s what happened to Republicans in 1998 with Bill Clinton.
|
Watergate 2.0 -- why the
IRS scandal is far worse
|
|
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,
|
When it rains, it pours: Ten
press conference take aways
|
|
Washington Post, by Jennifer Rubin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/17/2013 4:52:42 AM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama’s press conference in the rain was not a success, if by success, his supporters would mean an event which convinces anyone who doesn’t work for him that he’s getting ahead of the scandal deluge. The sight of a Marine holding an umbrella over his head only added to the weirdness of the event. So what did we learn? 1. He has full confidence in Attorney General Eric Holder, the man who purportedly recused himself (whenever) without putting it in writing (whatever). When asked about the untrammeled snooping on Associated Press reporters and editors,
|
| | |
|
|
