A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Obama Asks Doctors to
Help Deal With Guns
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Obama Asks Doctors to
Help Deal With Guns

Weekly Standard, by Daniel Halper

Original Article

Posted By:JoniTx, 1/16/2013 2:30:32 PM

According to a background briefer provided by the White House, President Barack Obama is asking doctors to help deal with guns. Here´s the relevant passage: PRESERVE THE RIGHTS OF HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS TO PROTECT THEIR PATIENTS AND COMMUNITIES FROM GUN VIOLENCE: We should never ask doctors and other health care providers to turn a blind eye to the risks posed by guns in the wrong hands. Clarify that no federal law prevents health care providers from warning law enforcement authorities about threats of violence: Doctors and other mental health professionals play an important role in protecting the safety

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: daphne, 1/16/2013 2:34:33 PM     (No. 9120437)

Oh goodie. I can just see my doctor doubled over with laughter at this latest insanity as he zooms from examining room to examining room because he is a board certified internist in Southern California who has a large caseload of Medicare patients--not sure that he´s accepting any new ones. O keeps talking and my doctor will take early retirement.


Reply 2 - Posted by: chumley, 1/16/2013 2:36:29 PM     (No. 9120443)

I asked the doctor I go to about that when Zerocare was first foisted on us. He said he would never ask in the first place. He said it was none of his business.
Then he told me about the nice AR-15 he had just bought.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Rubinski, 1/16/2013 2:38:24 PM     (No. 9120445)

As a health care provider this concerns me greatly.

Am I now liable for a patient that commits gun violence? Will I be sued if I don´t report to the authorities and something happens with my patient?

I suspect I could be liable if it is now incumbent upon me to ask and document whether they have a gun at home, where the guns are stored, where the ammunition is kept etc.

Fascist state--it´s here.


Reply 4 - Posted by: shamrock, 1/16/2013 2:40:35 PM     (No. 9120451)

#3, anyone that would answer those intrusive questions is nuts, so rat them out. There, helped you out.


Reply 5 - Posted by: youngtexan, 1/16/2013 2:43:20 PM     (No. 9120454)

I´ll be damned if my doctor ask me questions about me being a gun owner.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Rubinski, 1/16/2013 2:43:52 PM     (No. 9120457)

I suppose I could chart "patient denies access to any guns", after telling the patient "I am supposed to ask you if you have access to any guns at home, because I have to report that to the government. You don´t, do you?"

It´s not like I am going to administer a lie detector test. I can´t control whether patients tell me the truth--I can only document what they tell me.


Reply 7 - Posted by: FL_Absentee_Voter, 1/16/2013 2:44:10 PM     (No. 9120459)

Won´t the remaining doctors soon be government employees, anyway? So this would fall in line with the master plan.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: NuGoddess, 1/16/2013 2:44:55 PM     (No. 9120461)

What about doctor/patient confidentiality? At what point is my physician obliged to violate my trust in him by ratting me out to the Feds?


Reply 9 - Posted by: Rubinski, 1/16/2013 2:45:50 PM     (No. 9120463)

**Of course I would not do that with someone I had actual concerns about...


Reply 10 - Posted by: Rubinski, 1/16/2013 2:47:21 PM     (No. 9120466)

#8, if the patient expresses intent to harm himself or others, medical confidentiality is trumped.


Reply 11 - Posted by: OhMy, 1/16/2013 2:51:11 PM     (No. 9120477)

All you doctors out there look on the bright side! You are not supposed to make a living by curing illness so now you could be allowed to get yourselves some income on the side by reporting gun owners to the government. Government work pays well and it could support you while you undertake the volunteer work of healh care provider.


Reply 12 - Posted by: whyyeseyec, 1/16/2013 2:52:17 PM     (No. 9120481)

Doctors, hospitals and clinics a-l-r-e-a-d-y notify the police when someone comes in with a gunshot wound.

Perhaps Dictator would like to assign an ATF agent to each doctor. They can hold hands during surgery so the agent can capture the bullet fresh from the wounded individual..../s/s/s

Stupid @ss govn.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: LadyHen, 1/16/2013 2:52:26 PM     (No. 9120482)

And we as patients are perfectly within our rights to out and out lie... just as we do about how much exercise we take and how much bad food we eat.


Reply 14 - Posted by: fayebeck, 1/16/2013 2:53:08 PM     (No. 9120484)

After all the bluff and bluster I just wonder how many "gun violence VICTIMS" will sue the doctors who did not play obama´s game?


Reply 15 - Posted by: Rubinski, 1/16/2013 2:55:50 PM     (No. 9120490)

#12 - when I worked trauma, there WERE in-hospital ATF agents that would observe bullets being removed--they would also collect them for evidence. It was so there was no mixup about the bullet during any criminal prosecution.

Sorry for the multiple posts.


Reply 16 - Posted by: ScarletPimpernel, 1/16/2013 2:56:11 PM     (No. 9120493)

#2 I hope there are more doctors like yours.

My husband and I refuse to answer questions about guns on those medical forms. Period. One doctor actually agreed with my husband that the question is inappropriate.


Reply 17 - Posted by: antiquegolf, 1/16/2013 2:56:26 PM     (No. 9120496)

Doctor: Mr. Antique, do you have any guns in your home?

Mr. Antique: Do you have any?


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: horacer, 1/16/2013 3:00:25 PM     (No. 9120508)

If you´re going to ask about guns then you have to ask about knives, hammers, chain saws, tire irons, bricks ...


Reply 19 - Posted by: Safari Man, 1/16/2013 3:04:05 PM     (No. 9120514)

#7 is on the right track. This is Obama revealing his feeling that medical professionals are already responsible to the government and are basically government agents. Its a small step from there to force them to b employees of the government.

George Orwell call your office.

I can see it now, the Dr says drop your trousers, bend over, and let me check you for weapons... as he snaps his latex gloves.


Reply 20 - Posted by: Penney, 1/16/2013 3:04:24 PM     (No. 9120518)

Doctor´s are already being required to ask a long list of personal questions of patients in order to comply with 0bamacare, including, ´´Does you house have a second story.´´ Now, 0bama adds this to the list?!!! How invasive of privacy can the dem pols get?!!! ...Enough already!

Shun dem pols!


Reply 21 - Posted by: peasantnumberthree, 1/16/2013 3:04:39 PM     (No. 9120520)

I agree this is an unwarranted intrusion into people´s lives.

If I am ever asked questions about this and am called on my answers, I plan to do what Dr. House says all patients do - lie.


Reply 22 - Posted by: heartsurgeon, 1/16/2013 3:08:07 PM     (No. 9120526)

Obama is making doctors liable for gun violence. I can see the lawsuits flying...


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: AltaD, 1/16/2013 3:15:50 PM     (No. 9120536)

I never lie to my doctors. When they ask how often I exercise I say "I don´t exercise.", when they ask I´m getting enough calcium or veggies I say, without hesitation, "No.". I think my frankness surprises them but I figure it´s best they know the truth. However, being a gun owner has nothing to do with my health so if/when I´m asked I will refuse to answer or maybe, I´ll lie.


Reply 24 - Posted by: heartsurgeon, 1/16/2013 3:17:41 PM     (No. 9120540)

Exactly how will this actually prevent any killing? Does anyone believe people are going to be arrested or committed based on report of threat? This isn´t even a new law or proposal, obama is merely deflecting potential blame to physicians, and likely spawning a new class of malpractice lawsuits based upon notfollowing HHS defined best practices in interrogating and reporting patients based on gun ownership....this is a nightmare.


Reply 25 - Posted by: Time4AR2, 1/16/2013 3:19:16 PM     (No. 9120544)

What happens if you assert your Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable search and seizure?


Reply 26 - Posted by: GreatPlains, 1/16/2013 3:21:19 PM     (No. 9120548)

His 2nd Order should raise eyebrows ,too.
Actually, cause them to fly off.
2. Address unnecessary legal barriers, particularly relating to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act,
that may prevent states from making information available to the background check system.

HIPAA has many draconian orders , like demands that all computers in physician´s office can never be viewed by the public.
If a spot check reveals an office computer at an improper angle , even just off a smidgen-the physician can face huge fines.
Physicians can even lose their licenses for picayune infractions.
But..now Barry wants physicians to tell the feds if someone
is depressed or stressed from marriage or job woes ?
We should all abide by Don´t Ask Don´t Tell as much as possible the next four looooong years.


Reply 27 - Posted by: Davids918, 1/16/2013 3:25:27 PM     (No. 9120556)

I´m sure the ACLU will want to chim-in on this topic just like they did with the mental hospitals, and prevented MA from having involuntary admittance which the mother wanted to do, but was prevented by the actions of the ACLU.


Reply 28 - Posted by: LadyHen, 1/16/2013 3:26:55 PM     (No. 9120561)

Oh btw... many doctors following the guidelines set out by the American Academy of Pediatrics "Injury Prevention Program" have for years been collecting information on firearms in homes with children.

The AAP´s position on guns has always been "no guns" so of course they have no agenda. /s


Reply 29 - Posted by: starsNstripes, 1/16/2013 3:47:26 PM     (No. 9120601)

Two points:

1. Last week several posts showed NRA-friendly language embedded in Obamacare that made it illegal for doctors to capture the answers to the "do you have any guns at home?" question and then forward this to any government agencies. The NRA apparently go Harry Reid to slip this into the bill at the 11th hour. So not only is HIPPA a roadblock, but now Obamacare is too. So now not only will doctors get sued by victims of gun crimes, but they´ll get sued by gun owners who have had their privacy violated. Lose-Lose for doctors.

2. If doctors will have to ask the "do you have guns at home" question and then report to authorities if the answer is yes, will Obama´s daughters get in trouble when they answer yes? After all, technically, the SS details all carry weapons in the Obama´s house(s) whether in DC or Hawaii.


Reply 30 - Posted by: bldrrepub, 1/16/2013 3:52:36 PM     (No. 9120608)

My doctor´s practice was part of a pilot study back in 2010. The questions started off innocuously enough: Have you traveled overseas recently?, etc. The third question was "Do you have any guns in the house?". I told the nurse with a added profanity that it was none of her business.


Reply 31 - Posted by: kanphil, 1/16/2013 3:53:05 PM     (No. 9120609)

When I took one of my flock in for a checkup the other week, there was a substitute doc there who asked the question. I answered indirectly saying most people in my neighborhood own guns. She followed with asking if I kept them locked up. "What locked up?" was my answer. She gave up. By the way, my regular doc would have known better than to ask.


Reply 32 - Posted by: Jubilationtcornpone, 1/16/2013 3:55:35 PM     (No. 9120612)

I haven´t read the actual legislation proposed, but what I get out of it is that doctors who feel their patients may be a danger to themselves or others, ask about guns in the household. My father went through a severe depressive episode several years ago and the doctor advised my mother to get the guns out of the house. I don´t know what the reporting requirements will be or if patients need to meet some threshold before reporting occurs. But iif we´re talking about keeping guns out of the hands of mentally unstable people, this may be a start.


Reply 33 - Posted by: Jethro bo, 1/16/2013 4:04:27 PM     (No. 9120622)

Meet the fascist state´s m=newest spy, your doctor. HOw pathetic has our gooberment gotten to sink to levels of destroying the trust between doctor and patient just so Big Brother can spy on its citizens.


Reply 34 - Posted by: Grambo, 1/16/2013 4:05:11 PM     (No. 9120625)

Of course, the purpose of physicians asking about guns is not to encourage or promote safety, it´s to find out where the guns are and put pins in the map so as to know where to go to get them.

The correct answer to the question is, "Doctor, can we stay on topic, my medical issues?"


Reply 35 - Posted by: rmsimms, 1/16/2013 4:08:30 PM     (No. 9120631)

Whatever you say to your doctor will be taken down and put in your central FedGov Obamacare™ file that can be freely accessed by anyone from Dem operatives to your insurance company....you bet I´m going to lie if they ask me. You can bet they will mark anything other than no as YES.


Reply 36 - Posted by: sgtfox of the jarhead clan, 1/16/2013 4:11:45 PM     (No. 9120635)

Next we will have the ´Obama Youth´ who will report any suspicious activity at home . It will be their duty in the young democrat brigades. They will be asked what books Dad reads and what his hobbies are.


Reply 37 - Posted by: nonsense, 1/16/2013 4:11:49 PM     (No. 9120636)

What´s the name of the lake where the boaters lost their guns overboard? In case I need it the next time I visit the friendly family dr.


Reply 38 - Posted by: Philipsonh, 1/16/2013 4:16:10 PM     (No. 9120642)

I have no guns and I am NOT going to tell my doctor about the B-52 Bomber I have in my garage. She would refer to to a psychiatrist,
but he is likely at the (gun) range practicing. Seriously, there is NOTHING one can think about our current Administration which would be too outrageous, because no matter how idiotic an idea you have, they always top it with more and more truly delusional ones. I doubt if even one doctor in 100 would even consider asking a patient about weapons, not ask, even CONSIDER. Obama is simply an alien to our culture and laws.
That is my OPINION.


Reply 39 - Posted by: rabbit, 1/16/2013 4:24:15 PM     (No. 9120652)

#3, teachers have been mandatory reporters in certain situation for years...and that wasn´t a ´fascist state´. It is about time that public safety got in line in front of patient privacy in the mental health field.

The psychiatrist in Colorado knew that her patient was deteriorating and had various fixations...yet she was unable to tell anyone. He killed and injured a lot of people. I, and a lot of other people, think she should not fear the ´privacy´ regulations and be able to report to law enforcement, or be able to seek inpatient evaluation for him.


Reply 40 - Posted by: steveW, 1/16/2013 4:27:06 PM     (No. 9120659)

It sure is beginning to feel like Obama is pushing, intentionally pushing, sentient Americans (those who didn´t vote for him) to the point of no return. I wonder what he plans to do then..


Reply 41 - Posted by: Charactercounts, 1/16/2013 4:29:21 PM     (No. 9120664)

#29 is correct. Our pediatrician asked our kids, about 20 years ago, about guns in our home. When I asked why he wanted to know, he told me that the American Academy of Pediatricians had mandated that they collect this information from patients.

By the way, the kids jumped up and down and told the doctor all about their supersoaker water guns.


Reply 42 - Posted by: Udanja99, 1/16/2013 4:33:03 PM     (No. 9120669)

S the bottom line is that all of this nonsense benefits lawyers. Imagine that.


Reply 43 - Posted by: eoddad, 1/16/2013 4:33:43 PM     (No. 9120670)

Cuba routinely loans out its so called Doctors, especially in Venezuela where they are KNOWN to act as Intelligence Collectors and Propagandist in the Barrios. The Obama Dictatorship is being built here one brick at a time.


Reply 44 - Posted by: Dante, 1/16/2013 5:06:15 PM     (No. 9120736)

Surely kitchen knives are also a danger, can we inquire about those as well? How about baseball bats and tire irons?


Reply 45 - Posted by: chief1942, 1/16/2013 5:10:37 PM     (No. 9120751)

My PCP actually has a .357 mag for her self protection. I worry little about this aspect of the debate. Even if she were to ask I would simply reply "None of your business. Next question?".


Reply 46 - Posted by: QRP, 1/16/2013 5:18:03 PM     (No. 9120772)

You had better answer NO. Anything else is going to go down as a yes.


Reply 47 - Posted by: Time4AR2, 1/16/2013 6:17:00 PM     (No. 9120887)

Rush and reply 41 wonder about obama´s motives.

Two words: Martial Law.


Reply 48 - Posted by: Blue-Z-Anna, 1/16/2013 6:35:12 PM     (No. 9120921)

Like that drunk in the bar....pushing...pushing...insulting...degrading.....giving no quarter.....showing no signs of someone who shares your ultimate goals....

....seems like just one punch would do it.

But then, I´m a lover not a fighter.

hash tag= lover, not fighter
do not investigate.


Reply 49 - Posted by: Coy860, 1/16/2013 6:44:01 PM     (No. 9120939)

Defense attorneys, even if their client TELLS them they are going to kill someone, are forbidden from notifying law enforcement..attorney/client privilege you know. s/


Reply 50 - Posted by: pineledger, 1/17/2013 5:43:24 AM     (No. 9121569)

Any doctor asks me that, I´m walking out.


Reply 51 - Posted by: feziwig, 1/17/2013 5:14:26 PM     (No. 9122794)

Just finished my second "wellness exam". Although the question was never asked, I had two replies at the ready:

a.) "None of your damned business".
b.) "What do you think of this little baby", as I pull my pistol out of my pocket.



Post Reply   Close thread 719283




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "JoniTx"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "JoniTx"



´The Unaccountable Executive´
American Thinker, by Rick Moran    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/23/2013 12:45:03 PM     Post Reply
A Wall Street Journal editorial socks it to the president and his hands-off management style. Every day brings new revelations about who knew what about the IRS targeting conservative groups during President Obama´s re-election campaign, but the overall impression is of a vast federal bureaucracy run amok. While the White House continues to peddle the story of a driverless train wreck, taxpayers are being treated to a demonstration of the dangers of an unwieldy and unaccountable administrative state. Look, Ma, no hands! In his press events, Mr. Obama has said that while he learned about the Cincinnati rogues

First Lady Michelle Obama
briefly dated Inspector
General whose audit set off
IRS investigation: report
New York Daily News, by Adam Edelman    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/23/2013 11:52:00 AM     Post Reply
It could have been a match made in tax haven. A young Michelle Obama once dated the inspector general who recently uncovered the IRS scandal, according to a bombshell report.The future First Lady, then known as Michelle Robinson, reportedly dated J. Russell George, the current IRS top watchdog responsible for investigating the widening trouble at the tax agency, while the two were at Harvard Law School in the 1980s, the National Journal reported.The power pair were both members of the Black Law Students Association (BLSA) and graduated together in 1988, and at the very least, shared a few

London attackers known
to British security services
Reuters, by Guy Faulconbridge & Michael Holden    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/23/2013 11:38:48 AM     Post Reply
LONDON- Two British men of Nigerian descent accused of hacking a soldier to death on a London street in revenge for wars in Muslim countries were known to security services, a source close to the investigation said Thursday. One man, filmed calmly justifying the killing as he stood by the body holding a knife and meat cleaver in bloodied hands, was named by acquaintances as 28-year-old Londoner Michael Adebolajo - a British-born convert to radical Islam. So frenzied was the attack, some witnesses thought they tried to behead the victim.

Ford to Shut Australia Plants
After Nine Decades on Costs
Bloomberg News, by David Fickling & David Stringer    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/23/2013 10:45:55 AM     Post Reply
Ford Motor Co. (F) will stop making cars in Australia, nine decades after founder Henry Ford first began building Model Ts in the country, as a surge in the currency undermines the local industry’s ability to compete with imports. Ford Australia faces costs double those in Europe and four times those of its Asian divisions, local President Bob Graziano told reporters today. He announced the loss of 1,200 jobs from October 2016 at two plants in Melbourne and Geelong.Australia’s three car makers have struggled as a 27 percent rise in the local dollar against the yen

Stratfor Email: Brennan
Behind ´Witch Hunt´ of
Journalists Reporting Leaks
Breitbart Big Journalism, by Kerry Picket    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/23/2013 7:34:34 AM     Post Reply
An obscure November 2012 Wikileaks email dump points to former White House counterterrorism adviser and now-CIA chief John Brennan as the person behind the “witch hunt” of journalists who reported unflattering Obama administration leaks. A little over a week after President Barack Obama’s reelection, Wikileaks released an email dump of global intelligence files from the private intelligence company Stratfor. One particular email, dated September 21, 2010 discussed President Obama’s “Leak Investigations.”

Obama to address drones,
Gitmo in security speech
Associated Press, by Lara Jakes & Lolita C. Baldor    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/23/2013 7:30:29 AM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON - President Barack Obama on Thursday is expected to address some of the thornier aspects of national security policy, including drone strikes, the prison at Guantanamo Bay and the dire threats Americans continue to face , even from fellow citizens. On the eve of the president´s speech at the National Defense University, the Obama administration revealed for the first time that a fourth American citizen had been killed in secretive drone strikes abroad. The killings of three other Americans in counterterror operations since 2009 were known before a letter from Attorney General Eric Holder to

Obama to announce plans
to lift ban on sending
Guantanamo detainees to Yemen
Fox News & Associated Press, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/23/2013 6:55:17 AM     Post Reply
President Obama will announce Thursday that the White House plans to lift the ban on sending detainees from Guantanamo Bay to Yemen, Fox News confirms, a move that could effectively resume efforts to close down the prison. That effort, however, has been stymied because many countries don´t want the detainees or are unwilling or unable to guarantee that once transferred, detainees who may continue to be a threat will not be released. There are currently about 166 prisoners at Guantanamo, and 86 have been approved for transfer as long as security restrictions are met.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Anthony Weiner announces NYC mayor run
75 replie(s)
Politico, by Kevin Robillard    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/22/2013 6:06:40 AM     Post Reply
Former Rep. Anthony Weiner, whose career in public life came to an abrupt end when he sent lewd pictures to a college student on Twitter, jumped back into politics on Wednesday by announcing a bid for mayor of New York City. “Look, I’ve made some big mistakes and I know I’ve let a lot of people down,” the Democrat said in a 2-minute video announcing his bid. “But I’ve also learned some tough lessons. I’m running for mayor because I’ve been fighting for the middle class and those struggling to make it for my entire life.

A Crack in the IRS Dam
55 replie(s)
Power Line, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:50:44 PM     Post Reply
The dam protecting the IRS scandal began to crack today when Lois Lerner, the IRS official who announced, and apologized for, the improper singling out of conservative-leaning organizations by IRS employees under her command, announced through her criminal defense lawyer that she will not testify as scheduled tomorrow before the House Oversight Committee. Rather, she will assert her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. This marks an enormous milestone in the IRS investigation. It can now be taken as more or less established that crimes were committed by Obama administration employees. Lerner’s lawyer tried to minimize the significance

Man questioned in Boston Marathon
bombing shot, killed by FBI

51 replie(s)
WCBV-TV [Boston], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 5/22/2013 7:21:44 AM     Post Reply
One of two men allegedly being questioned in connection with the Boston Marathon bombings was shot and killed by an FBI agent in Florida on Tuesday, (Snip)A friend of Ibragim Todashev said he and Todashev were being investigated as part of the Boston bombings. He said Todashev, 27, knew bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev because both were MMA fighters. The man claims he and Todashev were interviewed by the FBI for nearly three hours on Tuesday. The friend said he left the interview, and when he came back to the apartment he found that there had been a shooting.

Top IRS official will
invoke Fifth Amendment

48 replie(s)
Los Angeles Times, by Richard Simon and Joseph Tanfani    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 3:53:35 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups. Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd. Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.

Criminality Appears To Lie at the
Heart of the IRS Scandal

46 replie(s)
New York Sun, by Lawrence Kudlow    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/23/2013 5:59:27 AM     Post Reply
When you get right down to it, the political targeting and stalling of tax-exempt applications by the IRS was an effort to defund the Tea Party. Rick Santelli, one of the Tea Party founders and my CNBC colleague, was the first to make this point. I’ve taken it a step further: The IRS was taking the Tea Party out of play for the 2012 election, as it looked to avoid a repeat of 2010 and another Tea Party landslide.There are a lot of numbers out there.

Darrell Issa: Lois Lerner
lost her rights

42 replie(s)
Politico, by Rachel Bade    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/22/2013 3:34:05 PM     Post Reply
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa said embattled IRS official Lois Lerner waived her Fifth Amendment rights and will be hauled back to appear before his panel again. The California Republican said Lerner’s Fifth Amendment right to avoid self-incrimination was voided when she gave an opening statement this morning denying any wrongdoing and professing pride in her government service. “When I asked her her questions from the very beginning, I did so so she could assert her rights prior to any statement,” Issa told POLITICO. “She chose not to do so — so she waived.”

Lois Lerner´s Brief And
Awful Day On Capitol Hill

42 replie(s)
NPR, by Frank James    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/22/2013 10:21:38 PM     Post Reply
The public got its first look Thursday at Lois Lerner, who has gone from faceless IRS bureaucrat to the face that launched what feels like 1,000 congressional hearings and conspiracy theories. But it was only a brief sighting since she didn´t stay long at a House hearing to further probe her role in how some IRS workers came to target conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status. (Snip)She did make a short statement to declare her innocence, however. Lerner´s motivation was more transparent than much of what the IRS has done in connection with this controversy. She was determined to


Post Reply   Close thread 719283





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~