|
|
| |
Topic: How Our Media Mislead on Guns |
How Our Media Mislead on Guns
Power Line, by John Hinderaker
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:StormCnter, 1/14/2013 6:03:35 AM
|
| That could be a long post! For now, let’s just note one aspect of the news media’s biased gun coverage: the media frequently paint the National Rifle Association as a sinister, shadowy organization that exercises a mysterious power over legislation. Thus this Yahoo News headline on a Christian Science Monitor article:(Snip for graphic)This is silly. Obviously, Congress has the “muscle” to pass whatever it wants to, and neither “gun lobby”–either pro or con–has any power to dictate to Congress. What is happening is that the pro-gun control forces don’t have the votes
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Rob_NC, 1/14/2013 6:12:36 AM (No. 9115088)
"GUN LOBBY" ...funny there`s never a specific person just some shadowy voice in the mist...I`m thinking the voice is the one rattling around in their heads...
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
jalo1951, 1/14/2013 6:15:09 AM (No. 9115091)
Just as one does not need to be intelligent to be an elected official you do not need to be intelligent to be a journalist.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
rabbit, 1/14/2013 6:47:15 AM (No. 9115125)
I find it amusing that the author laughs at the uneducated term "magazine clips"...and then turns around and gives an uneducated ´reason´ for mentally ill people to perpetrate mass killings.
Mentally ill people don´t do this because it is in the news and they think it will make them famous. Mentally ill people do this because they are psychotic; they have delusional, irrational thinking going on in their brains. That irrational thinking can take many turns. Some think that, by taking this action, they will save the earth from an alien invasion. Others think they are saving the President from an invasion from country X. Or that Mom has some incurable disease that can only be overcome by doing this deed. Or....
I know, these are nutty ideas, right? But...that is the way the mind works in the midst of psychosis. Anyone with the capacity to think through what he is doing...wouldn´t be doing it in the first place! If you want to reduce the homicides by the seriously mentally ill, you have to (1) get them into treatment more easily and (2) make it harder for them to get hold of weapons.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
King of all trolls, 1/14/2013 6:59:26 AM (No. 9115138)
The most frightening aspect of the whole tragedy is the way in which the media was able to use hysterical and saturated coverage to whip up a mob of heavily mediated women and some men to take away part of our Bill of Rights. Our Bill of Rights are not negotiable. And guns are not any more evil than knives, or hammers, or cars, or subway trains, or any other instrumentalities that can be used by evil people for evil purposes.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
philsner, 1/14/2013 7:16:38 AM (No. 9115159)
All he said was that violating the 1st amendment would be more effective than violating the 2nd amendment. Neither is warranted.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
pineledger, 1/14/2013 7:33:42 AM (No. 9115176)
Mr. L did his usual Sunday blood pressure elevating routine of watching MSNBC while I cooked and listened. Incredible. Candy Crowley needs to be institutionalized.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Crosscut, 1/14/2013 8:28:23 AM (No. 9115250)
Political suicide for Democrats.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Judith, 1/14/2013 8:31:52 AM (No. 9115258)
Maybe if we had a two party system? Maybe if we had the old republican party? Maybe if we had a citizenry with common sense? Alas, we have none of the above. I´m from MA and if I want to find ONE happy place to visit in this state, at this time, I go to Bass Pro Shop. What a bunch of happy hunters and fishermen and families. My husband and I go there just for the atmosphere. Since 11/2008, however, I always stop by the gun area to see people exercising their Second Amendment rights. Which, from the sounds of it, and with the republican party´s enthusiastic support, will shortly cease to exist.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Patchy Groundfog, 1/14/2013 8:44:42 AM (No. 9115283)
The left never tires of the phrase ´gun lobby´ but with 100 million owners and 300+ million guns isn´t the ´lobby´ actually the building with the statists occupying a small broom closet?
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
LZK, 1/14/2013 8:57:45 AM (No. 9115305)
Psychotic shooteres -- are the journalists´ bread and butter. They don´t have to research the "reason" -- it´s easy.....
Don´t be calling these journalists "OUR" media. They are NOT mine....they are in the pockets of the libbie/leftie/wackos.....
LZK
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
hamrman, 1/14/2013 9:49:10 AM (No. 9115408)
They are nothing more than mindless morons...will common sense please report for duty?
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
owl, 1/14/2013 10:03:19 AM (No. 9115439)
" How the media misleads " is an oxymoron . They are the propaganda arm of the socialist party . That simple . If you´re a conservative , don´t give yourself a heart attack paying them any attention . Go do something constructive that´ll make you happy .
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
zazu, 1/14/2013 10:35:42 AM (No. 9115511)
What a bunch of morons!! If you are going to report or write about something you should at least have some basic knowlege. My M1 Garand uses clips. Everything else uses magazines.
They call semi-auto wheapons automatics, Really? Need a class three license for that.
Also, technically you could consider a double action revolver a semi-automatic. (one pull one shot) With a speed loader you can reload almost as fast as with a magazine.
Idiots, Morons and other names I could not say on this thread.
LHT
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Butch59, 1/14/2013 10:59:51 AM (No. 9115588)
I wonder if anyone ever bothers to read a little history of this country. There was a time, not too far distant, that these mass killings and attacks on schools, etc. didn´t happen. And the people that were mentally deranged and were apt to do some acts like that were institutionalized. But something happened. The country became awash in tears about all the helpless and harmless people and fought to get them removed from said institutions and had the institutions closed down. Now we have those same people living on the streets (the homeless) and mentally deranged people walking around being a danger to any and all. But just try to bring up the true reasons and you will be called every vile name in the book. And some that aren´t. So, in truth, nothing that might work is going to bet done. That´s my two cents worth.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Butch59, 1/14/2013 11:01:43 AM (No. 9115596)
sorry. Nothing is going to "get" done.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
BaseballFan, 1/14/2013 11:10:35 AM (No. 9115621)
And while we´re at it, let´s call the Left what they are, and dispense with the description of what they are not.
What they are is "anti-2nd Amendment", or if you will, "anti-Constitution". What they are not is "pro gun-control".
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
trapper, 1/14/2013 11:14:22 AM (No. 9115634)
If the NRA is the gun lobby, is the ACLU the speech lobby?
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Bobn.T, 1/14/2013 11:18:34 AM (No. 9115648)
And Candy Crowley is not candy. She´s more like a pork roast.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Gazelle2, 1/14/2013 11:24:59 AM (No. 9115672)
Poster #8 nailed it. Politicians like Øbama and Feinstein have nothing to lose. On the other hand, however, a whole bunch of democrat senators and representatives remember what happened in 2006 to those who were arm twisted into voting for Øbamacare. The last thing in the world they want to do is to go on the record as voting for gun restrictions. They are hoping beyond hope that Øbama will go it alone by using Executive fiat instead of making Congress vote on the issue. To them, this is even worse than having to vote on Øbamacare because this proposed legislation has zero percent chance of passing.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
faith_and_reason, 1/14/2013 12:49:01 PM (No. 9115865)
Contrary to the mental health expert (/sarcasm off) #3, who claims these are mentally ill people who think they are stopping a Martian invasion or something, these are actually evil Narcissists who can´t stand to discover the world doesn´t revolve around them.
They aren´t shooting water pistols at portraits on the wall. They are craftily gathering high-tech pistols, rifles, ammo and explosives, researching where the gun-free zones are, and amassing the largest possible list of deaths possible with the least possible resistance.
Media coverage definitely fuels it, as do gun-free zones, but gun possession by millions of random, anonymous passers-by would be a huge deterrent. And those not deterred would be quickly dispatched to h*ll.
And if one rare attacker was trying to kill kids by the dozens for some purely delusional purpose, it would still be best to kill him as quickly and efficiently as possible.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Polecat49, 1/14/2013 12:49:43 PM (No. 9115868)
obama said he has executive power to more or less do whatever in the H-ll he wants to do. I´ve heard obama supporters called the under informed. I just wonder when will they ever put their brains in gear to learn or recall that is how adolph hitler, joe stalin or mao got so much power. I guess most of them never heard about the Jewish supporters of hitler in Germany of the 1930s.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
Marzon, 1/14/2013 12:51:53 PM (No. 9115872)
Did not the KKK commit its dirty deeds in packs? A black man about to be lynched by a mob of sheetheads could probably use an AR-15 with some high capacity mags. If the left disgrees, they must be in favor of lynchings.
Did not Obama´s justice department give thousands of high capacity "assault" rifles to brutal drug gangs? A rancher in the southwest running into them would be much better off with an AR-15 and high cap mags as well. Again the lefties are in favor of more dead ranchers.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
suncitypro, 1/14/2013 1:34:06 PM (No. 9115976)
I hope the demdumbs get a bill to present to Congress--then let´s see who votes to restrict any part of the 2nd Amendment. That will tell us who will not be there in 2014. We can only hope.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
peterfleming, 1/14/2013 1:48:35 PM (No. 9116006)
Feinstein wants what Hitler wanted. Schumer, Bloomberg, George Clooney want what Stalin wanted. Chief Nazi propagandist Herman Goebbels wanted what all of our unionized TV news actor want. They all want to end private ownership of guns. What better way to introduce tyranny, dictatorship, than to remove guns from the hands of all war veterans, retired police and sheriffs, licensed hunters, Olympic quality championship marksmen, and millions of highly responsible individuals in every neighborhood of our sensible society? It can never happen by law, and it will never happen by tyranny of Obama or any other dictator communist. The State wants every American to be classified as a lawbreaker, subject to arbitrary arrest at any given, convenient time of day or night. That can never happen. And that is the ultimete goal of the State; to be able to arbitrarily classify ANYbody as a criminal.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
Rafter, 1/14/2013 2:44:59 PM (No. 9116110)
#8 and also #20 are onto it...
Overreaching by a mean and arrogant president is going to backfire on him. No pun intended.
FDR blew up his far vaster popularity post-1936 landslide by attempting to "pack" the Supreme Court.
(Only Hitler´s idiocy in starting the war in 1939 enabled FDR to justify running again for a third term. Unemployment was 16 percent in Dec 1941, showing the "New Deal" did not solve our problems, only delayed recovery.)
The results in the 2010 midterms will be repeated even worse for Obama´s party in the 2014 midterms in reaction to the horrors of Obamacare and the economy, etc. And the backfire on this gun-grab plan will add to the GOP´s turnout and votes. You could almost guarantee a pro-conservative vote. The GOP will then own the House and Senate by Jan. 2015. &... We can take the WH in 2016.
For #19, I´d like to point out... if Candy Crowley had married the late comic, her look-alike, Jon Candy... today, she´d be... Candy Candy. Serve that with the pork roast.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
stryker714, 1/14/2013 3:10:20 PM (No. 9116150)
How about the 2013 Miss America to be, Miss New York: Mallory Hytes Hagan, who answered the Sandy Hook gun question with an answer that she, "didn´t believe in countering violence with violence" answer? Must have made Sam Champion the questioner all warm and fuzzy. She should run that viewpoint by parents who would have loved to have armed security at Sandy Hook. Their presence is a great deterrent.
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
Sinatra5, 1/14/2013 5:35:18 PM (No. 9116398)
"A LITTLE GUN HISTORY These are round numbers, but close enough to teach a lesson:
*In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million "dissidents", unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated. *In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated. *Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, a total of 13 million Jews and others unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated. *China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated. *Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated. *Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated. *Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, one million educated people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated. *Defenseless people rounded up and exterminated in the 20th Century because of gun control: 56 million. Take away the People´s guns and you leave them defenseless, whether you think it´s applicable or not. A defenseless citizenry invites tyranny. "
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
peterfleming, 1/14/2013 7:09:07 PM (No. 9116562)
Sinatra5 #28 repeats the tyranical history of gun confiscation, from dictator after dictator..all with predictable, terrifying results. Our Bloombergs, Feinsteins, Reids are power crazed looneys who want to send us on a journey to holocaust hell. This list, above, needs to be re-posted daily until the communist Obamas, Bidens, Sawyers Schumers and Boxers shut down their Nazi Goebelsian citizen hate campaign. Bravo Sinatra5 !
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
Dodge Boy, 1/14/2013 8:53:01 PM (No. 9116721)
Here here #28. This is what the sheep out there need to see. Folks, when will we get past the complaining stage, draw the line, and march on Washington with the message to back off?
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
Polecat49, 1/14/2013 11:06:16 PM (No. 9116902)
One or more of our greatest dangers as a Nation is that our so-called mass media has sold the United States down the drain for 17 (seventeen pieces of silver). The vast majority of them worship at their altars to karl marx and more hideous past tyrants and dictators. Our so-called media makes a habit of Lying, Cheating anf Stealing and have gotten so good at it that they can convince 51 percent of the American people to sell themselves into slavery or servitude.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"
|
|
Eric Holder versus journalism
|
|
Salon, by Alex Pareene
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/24/2013 10:19:23 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Attorney General Eric Holder personally signed off on the warrant naming Fox News journalist James Rosen a “possible co-conspirator” in violation of the Espionage Act, Michael Isikoff reported yesterday. Which is sort of awkward, because Barack Obama also yesterday told the country (the whole country) that he didn’t want to criminalize reporting, and that he was going to ask his Justice Department to make sure not to do that anymore. Rosen wasn’t charged. In truth, the government never really intended on charging him. (Snip)That’s the scandal: That the government could charge a journalist with, effectively, spying, simply for reporting.
|
|
A Toxic Combination
|
|
Weekly Standard, by Jeffrey H. Anderson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/24/2013 10:07:20 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Of all the scandals in his administration that President Obama knows nothing about, the one Americans find most appalling is the decision by the Internal Revenue Service to target the president’s political adversaries. What’s more, as subsequent congressional testimony has made clear, the IRS isn’t particularly repentant about its actions. One thing Republicans and Democrats should therefore be able to agree on is that this is no time to significantly expand the IRS’s power. Yet that is exactly what will happen under Obamacare if no action is taken. A simple proposal: Remove the IRS from any role
|
|
The United States of El Norte
|
|
American Spectator, by Larry Thornberry
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/24/2013 6:13:28 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Rookie Florida Senator Marco Rubio continues to work tirelessly to get the United States to annex Mexico, though an exhaustive (and exhausting) search of his 2010 election campaign reveals no promises to do, nor even a mention that he might consider doing such an outlandish thing. Au the contraire, the pre-election Rubio said all the right things about line-cutters and lawbreakers. That’s one of the reasons he’s a senator today. There are only two sure consequences of the current 800-page immigration hairball before Congress. The first is that a minimum of 11 million citizens of other countries, more Mexicans
|
President Obama dreamily wants to scale back the war on terror
|
|
New York Daily News, by Editorial
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/24/2013 6:04:56 AM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama declared on Thursday that it’s time for the U.S. to leave behind the global war on terror. He might first try convincing America’s war-waging global enemies to do the same. Almost a dozen years after 9/11, the President wishfully hopes to demilitarize national security in the age of Islamist radicalism. He judges the country ready for such a step because a long fight has markedly degraded the attacking capacities of Al Qaeda and affiliates. Even so, Obama dared not utter the word victory in his address at the National Defense University, because plainly the hostiles are still coming
|
The Mystery of the Queens Accountant Held for $3 Million for 32 Days
|
|
Atlantic, by Dashiell Bennett
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/24/2013 5:46:39 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In a strange true-life story that seems ripped from TV crime drama (rather than the other way around), a New York City man was kidnapped and held for ransom for over a month, before the NYPD rescued him this week. Pedro Portugal was grabbed off the street in broad daylight on April 18, and held hostage in a Queens warehouse (pictured above) while a group of men attempted to extract a $3 million ransom from his family in Ecuador. Police in both countries (with the help of the State Department) tracked down the kidnappers,
|
Obama Asks Staff to Start Cc’ing Him on Stuff
|
|
New Yorker, by Andy Borowitz
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/24/2013 5:31:36 AM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON —In a dramatic departure from existing White House procedures, President Obama requested today that his staff start cc’ing him on stuff. “Look, I know a lot of you think I’m really busy and you don’t want to bother me,” the President reportedly told his staff in an Oval Office meeting. “But cc me anyway. It’s good for me to keep up on what’s going on around here.” “It’s not good when I turn on the news and they’re talking about something at the White House and I’m like, whoa, when did that happen?”
|
|
O ‘ends’ terror war
|
|
New York Post, by John Podhoretz
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/24/2013 5:28:38 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Amid catcalls from a Leftist heckler too blitheringly stupid to understand her dream was coming true, President Obama yesterday declared his intention to end the War on Terror — not quite 12 years since the 9/11 attacks. In what may have been the most important speech of his presidency, Obama said he would ask Congress to join him in efforts to “refine, and ultimately repeal,” the Authorization to Use Military Force passed three days after 9/11. In other words, he intends to write the War on Terror out of US law. “This war, like all wars, must end,” he said.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Lois Lerner´s Brief And Awful Day On Capitol Hill
|
|
NPR, by Frank James
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/22/2013 10:21:38 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The public got its first look Thursday at Lois Lerner, who has gone from faceless IRS bureaucrat to the face that launched what feels like 1,000 congressional hearings and conspiracy theories. But it was only a brief sighting since she didn´t stay long at a House hearing to further probe her role in how some IRS workers came to target conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status. (Snip)She did make a short statement to declare her innocence, however. Lerner´s motivation was more transparent than much of what the IRS has done in connection with this controversy. She was determined to
|
Criminality Appears To Lie at the Heart of the IRS Scandal
|
|
New York Sun, by Lawrence Kudlow
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/23/2013 5:59:27 AM
Post Reply
|
|
When you get right down to it, the political targeting and stalling of tax-exempt applications by the IRS was an effort to defund the Tea Party. Rick Santelli, one of the Tea Party founders and my CNBC colleague, was the first to make this point. I’ve taken it a step further: The IRS was taking the Tea Party out of play for the 2012 election, as it looked to avoid a repeat of 2010 and another Tea Party landslide.There are a lot of numbers out there.
|
Eva Longoria graduates with master´s degree in Chicano studies
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Nardine Saad
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: NorthernDog- 5/23/2013 3:03:53 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Eva Longoria is backing up her beauty with a whole lot of brain. The actress graduated with a master´s degree Wednesday. Longoria, 38, took home a real degree (not an honorary one) in Chicano studies from Cal State Northridge, where she physically attended classes for three years, according to TMZ. "Big day today!!! Very excited to graduate for my master´s degree in Chicano studies! You´re never too old or too busy to continue your education!" the actress wrote on her Who Say site Wednesday, sharing loads of pics of her big day, posing with her family, cohorts and diploma.
|
Why was the Department of Homeland Security monitoring Tea Party IRS demonstrations?
|
|
American Thinker, by Sally Zelikovsky
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: magnante- 5/23/2013 8:09:21 AM
Post Reply
|
|
What´s so interesting about 60 tea partiers protesting the IRS in San Jose, California on Tuesday, May 21st? The fact that this bit of information was conveyed to the protesters by a Department of Homeland Security officer who was also in attendance. What was a DHS agent doing at the San Jose Tea Party protest? (snip) they weren´t just spying on us in San Jose and monitoring us in San Francisco, they were watching us throughout the entire state
|
Obama nominates Nuland for assistant secretary of state
|
|
Politico, by Reid J. Epstein
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/23/2013 10:08:52 PM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama on Thursday nominated Victoria Nuland, a State Department official involved in the editing of the administration´s talking points on Benghazi, to be the next assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs. Nuland, a career foreign service officer who was until recently State´s top spokesperson, had long been expected to be nominated the post to replace Philip Gordon, who Obama picked to serve as Middle East coordinator for the National Security Council. Nuland´s nomination -- which requires Senate confirmation -- could come under scrutiny from Republicans who see her as playing a central role in shaping
|
The Mystery Night
|
|
Politico, by Rich Lowry
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: RappVol- 5/23/2013 7:36:59 AM
Post Reply
|
|
On “Fox News Sunday” last weekend, White House aide Dan Pfeiffer was asked about President Barack Obama’s whereabouts the night of the Sept. 11 attack in Benghazi. This was the night when we lost our first ambassador in 30 years, and when three other Americans were killed in an attack that lasted all night long at multiple locations within the eastern Libyan city. Since the president is commander in chief, one would think where he was and what he did during such an event would be of obvious public concern.
|
Darrell Issa: Lois Lerner lost her rights
|
|
Politico, by Rachel Bade
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/22/2013 3:34:05 PM
Post Reply
|
|
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa said embattled IRS official Lois Lerner waived her Fifth Amendment rights and will be hauled back to appear before his panel again. The California Republican said Lerner’s Fifth Amendment right to avoid self-incrimination was voided when she gave an opening statement this morning denying any wrongdoing and professing pride in her government service. “When I asked her her questions from the very beginning, I did so so she could assert her rights prior to any statement,” Issa told POLITICO. “She chose not to do so — so she waived.”
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|