A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Lance Armstrong´s
worldwide web of lies
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Lance Armstrong´s
worldwide web of lies

New York Daily News, by Mike Lupica

Original Article

Posted By:StormCnter, 1/13/2013 5:43:55 AM

To the end Lance Armstrong, desperate to remain relevant, somehow is allowed to control his own narrative. So after all the lies from Armstrong from across all the years, lies about himself and about all those who dared to tell the truth about him, there comes one last one: That he still has something we want. To the end this guy thinks he can play the whole world for suckers. Unless Armstrong and his team of lawyers and crisis managers have him back out of his interview with Oprah Winfrey at the last moment

Comments:
Welcome to Pete Rose´s tarnished world, Mr. Armstrong. There are consequences to the brand, even for the icons.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Japanorama, 1/13/2013 6:33:58 AM     (No. 9113632)

I´ll bet every pro cyclist uses drugs or blood doping.


Reply 2 - Posted by: floridagator, 1/13/2013 6:57:22 AM     (No. 9113646)

Is Lance a cad in his personal life? Maybe. Is he also the greatest man to have ever raced in competitive cycling? Absolutely. All of the grousing and whining in the world will never change that. Only punks, losers and old women continue to pretend that any of this truly matters. My favorite CSM was a Dominican immigrant who would stand in front of formation and pronounce, "If you´re not cheatin´, you´re not trying." Miniscule trolls like Lupica, who probably couldn´t even throw a baseball 60 feet or ride a bike 10 miles, seem to be the favored sports journalists in a community of midgets who´ve made a living sniffing the jocks of great men. Mike, you are a pathetic, little man. I don´t care how much money you have, how many awards you´ve won, or who the people are at ESPN/NY Daily News that think you´re cute. You´ve never been able to reach the top shelf of a kitchen cabinet, carry a woman in your arms, or compete mano a mano in any way. I feel sorry for you.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Pluperfect, 1/13/2013 7:01:48 AM     (No. 9113654)

Sorry, #2. Lots of athletes can do wondrous things with the help of performance enhancement drugs, even racehorses. It´s not ok.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Hank Reardon, 1/13/2013 7:04:11 AM     (No. 9113659)

Bet your wrong, #1.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Hank Reardon, 1/13/2013 7:04:55 AM     (No. 9113661)

you´re


Reply 6 - Posted by: Crosscut, 1/13/2013 7:10:54 AM     (No. 9113667)

Let all these jock morons of whatever sport drug away. I don´t care.


Reply 7 - Posted by: Emerson, 1/13/2013 7:14:02 AM     (No. 9113669)

Lupica has never accomplished anything, drugged or not.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: earlybird, 1/13/2013 7:17:56 AM     (No. 9113673)

The "drug" that Armstrong is accused of using has been an integral part of cancer treatment, to prevent anemia by aiding in rebuilding the red blood cell production damaged by chemotherapy, for some time. He would have had to have it for that purpose. Did that get snarled up with his racing?

When you read the reports most of the griping comes from his competitors and their wives. It seems to me that they have a built-in conflict of interest.

That said, I have no interest in Oprah ever, regardless of her guest.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Spidey, 1/13/2013 7:45:14 AM     (No. 9113705)

I hear ads on the radio all the time on products boosting testosterone and others selling HGH formulas but both are considered as PEDs by professional sports owners/operators.Both products are produced naturally by the body and all these supplements do is boost the levels causing quicker muscle development. I mean whey power products can do the same thing.So it´s hard for me to understand why legal products are banned from sports use. You still need a base skill to produce in any sport.

I don´t know what Armstrong is accused of,nor do I care because I hate the sport of cycling to begin with.One of Armstrong´s whistle blowers said he got death threats,more that likely some came from Armstrong himself. Whatever stupid mea culpa he does on Oprah means absolutely nothing to me.He´s only came clean after evidence cornered him in a box.I have questions about his mentality from dating Cheryl Crow,a lefty fruitcake if there ever was one.


Reply 10 - Posted by: bpl40, 1/13/2013 8:01:43 AM     (No. 9113721)

This is cabinet level talent. Zippy must not let it go waste. What, no experience or qualification for the job? Even better!


Reply 11 - Posted by: tocsin, 1/13/2013 8:19:43 AM     (No. 9113745)

You lost me at Opie


Reply 12 - Posted by: vesicant, 1/13/2013 8:38:32 AM     (No. 9113767)

Maybe scumbama dopes? It would explain a lot.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: NorthernDog, 1/13/2013 8:39:27 AM     (No. 9113769)

We´ll have to see what the actual ´confession´ is, but this is a huge disappointment. Perhaps cyclists like Greg LeMond feel a little bit vindicated now, since he had blowing the whistle on Armstrong and others for many years.


Reply 14 - Posted by: Edgelady, 1/13/2013 8:44:11 AM     (No. 9113778)

A cheat is a cheat; his scam was so elaborate he´d have blood transfusions to get rid of evidence. He wasn´t just a bad husband and a cad - he let down a whole bunch of people at his foundation.

I´m talking about the essence of the man´s character. You can use the relativity of his enhanced prowess all you want. That memory will now be cast aside because of his other gargantuan effort: lie and fool everybody.

To me it´s perfectly pitiful that he´s taken the Oprah route. There´s historical evidence now as to how bad many her choices of champion have gone. I chose not to get her channel, but wouldn´t watch it anyway, not even to see him do the grovelling bit on TV.


Reply 15 - Posted by: LZK, 1/13/2013 8:46:55 AM     (No. 9113788)

Those who can -- DO -- those who can´t write stories and sniff jock straps....

Love that line -- poster # 2....

It´s like movie critics and food critics....

Who cares........ The man beat cancer, cycled into the history books inspite of the dogs biting at his back....

It´s not like the hilton tramps or the kardasian misfits who did "nothing" and are media pets....

Mediocre seems to be the rallying cry for this bunch -- led by lupica.

LZK


Reply 16 - Posted by: skedaddle, 1/13/2013 8:52:32 AM     (No. 9113802)

I´m so disappointed...that Oprah is still doing interviews.


Reply 17 - Posted by: knarfski, 1/13/2013 8:53:23 AM     (No. 9113805)

Deal with it #2...reminds me of a Clinton defense: "It´s all about sex." No, it was about lies--to millions and millions of people, far and wide. POTUS!

Armstrong: the "greatest man" in competitive cycling? Greatest?


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Lawsy0, 1/13/2013 9:04:34 AM     (No. 9113832)

Just as is Oprah, ´´Snakey, sneaky, awash in self importance.´´ Poster #1 wins first place for Cynic of the Day.


Reply 19 - Posted by: navybrat, 1/13/2013 9:17:58 AM     (No. 9113850)

I don´t understand all the interest in a bicycle rider. What is so wonderful about him even if he did not take drugs.


Reply 20 - Posted by: cb, 1/13/2013 9:36:26 AM     (No. 9113875)

Lance trashed a lot of people who were telling the truth. I wonder if his apology will include that.


Reply 21 - Posted by: JAN, 1/13/2013 9:47:59 AM     (No. 9113891)

Compared to the lies told by O and his cohorts, this is irrelevant.

JMO


Reply 22 - Posted by: postaway, 1/13/2013 9:51:11 AM     (No. 9113898)

The lefty Mike Lupica is not a beloved figure on this blog and for good reason. Another athlete of a different color or race would probably be treated, if anything was said at all by Lupica, with sympathy and the kind of paternalism that now passes for compassion. But cheating is cheating. We long for heroes but are fed a steady diet f phoneys. It´s not good for our children to see us make excuses for such people. And having or having had cancer isn´t no excuse. Armstrong was living a lie rather than trying to reform a dirty sport.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: TheMotherCO, 1/13/2013 10:03:26 AM     (No. 9113922)

#2 and #8 said it best - I do remember that incident and it was whiners from other countries that started that rumor and at the time, I thought it was stupid that no meds, no nothing could be taken by an athelete. Good lord, they get sick, have allergies and sometimes need medicines. The other countries were dismal.


Reply 24 - Posted by: mozey, 1/13/2013 10:21:33 AM     (No. 9113950)

Oh poor me. Armstrong is just another narcissist who will do or say or leak anything to keep himself on the front page. As an above poster mentioned, he reminds me of Pete Rose. But at least Rose has just reduced himself to whining and selling signed pictures, not crying to a bunch of foolish women and their Leader, Oprah. Armstrong has now hit bottom.


Reply 25 - Posted by: gazela, 1/13/2013 10:31:34 AM     (No. 9113973)

I can´t say I care much for Armstrong´s lies and treatment of other people, but I fail to see how taking him down does anything to vindicate the sport of cycling. It seems that everyone in the top tier of cyclists was doping and that nobody won any of the big races without doping. It´s disappointing, but not terribly surprising, that Armstrong wasn´t the super-athlete that he appeared to be, but his sport was, and probably always will be, dirty with dope.


Reply 26 - Posted by: bldrrepub, 1/13/2013 11:02:04 AM     (No. 9114040)

Good Lord people.

Its not (just) about the doping. It is the trafficking, the lying, the bribery to the UCI, and USADA, the witness intimidation in a Federal case, the threatening of other riders´ wives, the public humiliation of anyone who dared question the myth, and on and on.

His own "Doctor" who started his doping program (Ferrari) thought that his early doping in the 90s gave him his cancer.

Get a clue.


Reply 27 - Posted by: capt scurvey, 1/13/2013 11:03:34 AM     (No. 9114044)

Lupica would probably do a lot better better if he started juicing, #2...


Reply 28 - Posted by: nonsense, 1/13/2013 11:07:30 AM     (No. 9114054)

Very strange, the interview has not taken place, yet we have all the "details". Very psychically interesting.

If only we had the same type of intellectual interest in the drug users who live and reign at the highest levels of the national government.


Reply 29 - Posted by: mamafrog, 1/13/2013 11:10:46 AM     (No. 9114063)

Cycling is a sport where everyone cheats, I learned that decades ago when I saw Breaking Away. I really don´t care about whether Lance cheated. I do admire his fight against cancer and I hope that he can go on to have a productive and meaningful life. But most of all I am glad that he has a life because he beat cancer.


Reply 30 - Posted by: TexaTucky, 1/13/2013 11:27:33 AM     (No. 9114103)

He threw his family away.

My hero.

But at least he has a sniffable jock.


Reply 31 - Posted by: califedup, 1/13/2013 11:41:07 AM     (No. 9114129)

Just the fact that Lance Armstrong is confessing his "sins" to the most worthless obese lump of flesh in existence (except Michael Moore) , Oprah Winfrey, who´s own "career" was built on a mountain of lies tells you just what kind of person Armstrong really is and how the moral standards of this country are almost to rock bottom. These two (Oprah and Lance)deserve each other.

Must not see TV. Gross.


Reply 32 - Posted by: navyjag907, 1/13/2013 11:46:23 AM     (No. 9114139)

I stopped being excited about being able to ride a bicycle when I turned 11. And I don´t own a TV so I can´t watch all the trash stuff. But Armstrong is a loser and a crook; if wants forgiveness, there are churches in that business.


Reply 33 - Posted by: columba, 1/13/2013 11:48:58 AM     (No. 9114144)

You have to hand it to Obama ... uh Lance: his lies are often believable.


Reply 34 - Posted by: RancherJack, 1/13/2013 11:59:54 AM     (No. 9114162)

Obama´s Life coach


Reply 35 - Posted by: bluefindad, 1/13/2013 12:10:15 PM     (No. 9114185)

Lance has been confronted with his own version of the ´blue dress´. It is destroying him.

Does Armstrong deserve his fate? Oh, yes. But wait, maybe he doesn´t. After all, what happened to the first man to be confronted with the blue dress?

Could there be different standards for politicians than sports figures?


Reply 36 - Posted by: woofwoofwoof, 1/13/2013 12:25:17 PM     (No. 9114221)

I´m conflicted about all of this. I tend to think, he got away with it fair and square, and probably most of his competitors were doing it too. He put in a lot of work cheating, it was very risky to himself, and that should be respected.


Reply 37 - Posted by: bldrrepub, 1/13/2013 1:56:38 PM     (No. 9114382)

Let´s not forget a meeting with Senator Diane Feinstein; two weeks later, his charity Livestrong makes a $100,000 donation to Planned Parenthood. One week later, Feinstein protege and US Attorney Andre Birotte drops the Justice Department´s criminal investigation with no consultation with the Federal investigators and only 15 minute notice.

Yeah, every bike racer does that - because they all do it. I saw it in a movie.


Reply 38 - Posted by: trapper, 1/13/2013 2:10:11 PM     (No. 9114397)

Lance Armstrong apparently took substances he knew were against the rules and then lied about it. Not once, which would make him weak and human, but over and over and over again, which makes him a liar and a cheat. Once one´s lack of character has been confirmed, only a lifetime of pennance and demonstrated change can earn back the trust that was destroyed. There is no quick fix.


Reply 39 - Posted by: SaguaroJack, 1/13/2013 2:12:09 PM     (No. 9114402)

The fix to doping is simple. Have two categories - the undoped and the doped. The undoped would be the only ones eligible to win a competition.

The doped could race and all that, but couldn´t win anything. Or perhaps have a 1st, 2d and 3d among the dopers.

The award ceremony would have to come a week or so after an event to allow for dope testing.


Reply 40 - Posted by: MariettaGator, 1/13/2013 2:40:39 PM     (No. 9114444)

#2 you´re an idiot and I´m ashamed you claim to be a Gator...


Reply 41 - Posted by: suncitypro, 1/13/2013 2:50:12 PM     (No. 9114458)

#26--Absolutely right!
Lance, plain and simple is a liar.
But then again liberals think that is a resume´ enhancer.


Reply 42 - Posted by: thelmalou, 1/13/2013 2:52:36 PM     (No. 9114460)

I knew all I needed to know about Lance Armstrong when he threw away his wife and kids for the glamour of fame and fortune. So this surprises me not one whit. Just another lying cheat who wants everybody to overlook his indiscretions so he can "move ahead" with the work of the people. Or something.


Reply 43 - Posted by: LoneVoice, 1/13/2013 3:06:21 PM     (No. 9114478)

I don´t understand the continued hero worship of a man who shown himself to be an absolute creep.

I saw the same thing when Clinton lied under oath.

I guess the rules that apply to us little people don´t apply to your heros.


Reply 44 - Posted by: bob913, 1/13/2013 3:18:10 PM     (No. 9114488)

Will he give up all the money he made by lying and cheating? Nope.


Reply 45 - Posted by: Japanorama, 1/13/2013 3:55:02 PM     (No. 9114529)

Many contemporary celebrities (athletes included) subscribe to the idea that the ends justify the means, because, once famous and rich, one can afford as many mea culpas as needed to pacify the law-abiding, uncelebrated suckers.


Reply 46 - Posted by: oldvlc, 1/13/2013 4:05:29 PM     (No. 9114539)

Lance used epogen, a red blood cell multiplier that, guess what, thousands of kidney patients and others use to maintain some level of energy through their day. I used to give myself injections of it daily when I was on dialysis, not that it helped greatly in the treatment of dying kidneys. I do NOT consider that substance much of an aid to the blood. Lance was the greatest cycling athlete since the Belgian Eddy Merkx, and his accomplishments should not have been ignored because of epogen. It just is not that much of a stimulant, if at all.


Reply 47 - Posted by: oldvlc, 1/13/2013 4:11:58 PM     (No. 9114547)

#4 you don´t know the seedy underside of professional European cycling. #1 would probably win a bet with you; the pressure and stakes are enormous for riders who routinely ride an average of 28 to 30 MPH over hundreds of miles, or in the case of the Tour, thousands. These kids see racing as their only hope out of desparate conditions, and are superstitious to the max along with willing to try anything to
give them an edge.


Reply 48 - Posted by: kelty, 1/13/2013 5:28:12 PM     (No. 9114626)

Breaking News: Asshat remains an asshat


Reply 49 - Posted by: leftcoastmom, 1/13/2013 8:15:22 PM     (No. 9114782)

If they were all doping then the "playing field" was still equal...yes? He is going to say that the drugs were for his cancer...probably true. This whole thing is sad. Please continue to support Livestrong!


Reply 50 - Posted by: ColonialAmerican1623, 1/13/2013 8:57:33 PM     (No. 9114809)

Whether it´s Lance Armstrong, Tiger Woods,
Pete Rose, Michael Vick or other athletes,
kids look up to you and you lied and cheated when given extraordinary opportunities they can only hope to have one day.

This is poor representation of the US worldwide.


Reply 51 - Posted by: Polecat49, 1/13/2013 9:00:10 PM     (No. 9114811)

#48. kind of sounds like any athlete who wants to turn pro OR kid wanting to be a democRAT politician.


Reply 52 - Posted by: Moonspinner, 1/13/2013 9:19:24 PM     (No. 9114831)

I really don´t care what Lance Armstrong did or didn´t do. I am more concerned about what politicians are doing to this country. Wish the media went after Obama and his ilk like they have been after Armstrong.



Post Reply   Close thread 718813




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"



Despite the WaPost, Benghazi
Is a Major Scandal
American Spectator, by Quin Hillyer    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 6:16:56 AM     Post Reply
There’s a huge red flag in the Benghazi mess, but conservatives are letting the media get away with using a red herring to avoid it. Give the establishment media credit for obstinacy: Once it settles on a standard narrative or explanation for a particular subject, it shows remarkable discipline in explaining away any evidence that contradicts its own approved spin. So it has been with the media’s 250-day old determination to downplay the scandalous nature of the Obama administration’s treatment of its outpost in Benghazi before, during, and after the terrorist attack there that took four American lives.

Role of Health-Law
´Navigators´ Under Fire
Wall Street Journal, by Louise Radnofsky    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 6:14:03 AM     Post Reply
Lawmakers across the country are tussling over the Obama administration´s plans to create a small army of assistants to guide millions of Americans as they sign up for new health-insurance options available this fall. Backers of the health-care overhaul face an uphill battle to spread the word about the law, in the face of consumer research that suggests most uninsured people know little about it and are skeptical about the value of health insurance generally. Some Democrats have openly worried that the administration is doing too little to make sure the enrollment process goes smoothly. That is where the "patient navigators"

Labor unions break ranks with
White House on ObamaCare
The Hill [DC], by Kevin Bogardus    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 6:04:54 AM     Post Reply
Labor unions are breaking with President Obama on ObamaCare. Months after the president’s reelection, a variety of unions are publicly balking at how the administration plans to implement the landmark law. They warn that unless there are changes, the results could be catastrophic. The United Food and Commercial Workers International Union (UFCW) — a 1.3 million-member labor group that twice endorsed Obama for president — is very worried about how the reform law will affect its members’ healthcare plans. Last month, the president of the United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers released a statement calling “for repeal

Issa Warns Hillary
National Review Online, by Jonathan Strong    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:36:12 AM     Post Reply
Since Hillary Clinton last came up to Capitol Hill, we’ve learned senior State Department officials sought to scrub references to terrorism from the infamous Benghazi talking points to insulate Foggy Bottom from political criticism — citing concerns of their “building’s leadership” to justify the demands. The rising temperature of the scandal means it’s possible that Hillary could be asked to return and testify again. If she comes back, she had better be prepared, says House Oversight and Government Reform chairman Darrell Issa. “We are interviewing lots of people, most of them under oath,” Issa says, describing the “methodical” approach his committee

Billy Sol: Now That Was a Scandal
Weekly Standard, by Geoffrey Norman    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:32:49 AM     Post Reply
We hear a lot, these days, about how President Obama is not like Lyndon Johnson and thanks be to heaven for that small mercy. The point seems to be that the president doesn´t know how to arm twist, sweet talk, bribe, and emasculate both friend and enemy (of which he truly had neither) in order to further his agenda. Since many among the chattering class believe, still, in that agenda, his is generally regarded as an excellent presidency. Never mind that more than half a century after Johnson declared war on poverty ...

How Hope and Change Gave
Way To Spying on the Press
Daily Beast, by Kirsten Powers    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:11:50 AM     Post Reply
First they came for Fox News, and they did not speak out – because they were not Fox News. Then they came for government whistleblowers, and they did not speak out – because they were not government whistleblowers. Then they came for the maker of a You Tube video, and – okay, we know how this story ends. But how did we get here?Turns out, it’s a fairly swift sojourn from a president pushing to “delegitimize” a news organization, to threatening criminal prosecution for journalistic activity by a Fox News reporter, James Rosen,

Ex-Diplomats Report New Benghazi
Whistleblowers with Info
Devastating to Clinton and Obama
PJ Media, by Roger L. Simon    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:02:13 AM     Post Reply
More whistleblowers will emerge shortly in the escalating Benghazi scandal, according to two former U.S. diplomats who spoke with PJ Media Monday afternoon. These whistleblowers, colleagues of the former diplomats, are currently securing legal counsel because they work in areas not fully protected by the Whistleblower law. According to the diplomats, what these whistleblowers will say will be at least as explosive as what we have already learned about the scandal, including details about what really transpired in Benghazi that are potentially devastating to both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



White House Chief of Staff knew about
damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark

61 replie(s)
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.

BREAKING: WashPost Reports
Obama DOJ Also Spied on
James Rosen of Fox News

49 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham    Original Article
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM     Post Reply
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:

Leaks turn to deluge
for reeling White House

48 replie(s)
New York Post, by John Podhoretz    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 4:49:13 AM     Post Reply
The wheels came off the Obama administration yesterday. We learned of a startling assault on freedom of the press by the Department of Justice, following the revelation last week of the unprecedented information-gathering foray by that department against The Associated Press. Then, a few minutes later, the Justice Department’s inspector general released a report declaring that the US attorney in Arizona used the leak of a confidential memo to try to discredit a whistleblower in the notorious “gun-walking” scandal known as Fast and Furious (which got two federal agents killed). The leak was called “egregious.”

Top IRS official will
invoke Fifth Amendment

48 replie(s)
Los Angeles Times, by Richard Simon and Joseph Tanfani    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 3:53:35 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups. Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd. Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.

White House Aide calls
Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´

41 replie(s)
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM     Post Reply
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.

If Your Doctor Asks You About
Guns, Do You Have to Answer?

39 replie(s)
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM     Post Reply
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement

Democratic Senator uses Okla.
tornado for anti-GOP rant
over global warming

39 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor    Original Article
Posted By: bamapreacher- 5/20/2013 8:20:54 PM     Post Reply
While many Americans were tuned into news coverage of the massive damage from tornadoes ravaging the state of Oklahoma, Rhode Island Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse took to the Senate floor to rail against his Republican colleagues for denying the theory of anthropogenic global warming. Whitehouse spent 15 minutes chastising GOP senators and justified his remarks by alluding to states that seek federal assistance in the wake of natural disasters. “So, you may have a question for me,” Whitehouse said. “Why do you care? Why do you, Sheldon Whitehouse, Democrat of Rhode Island, care


Post Reply   Close thread 718813





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~