A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: National Organization for Women:
´President Obama, where
are the Women?´
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
National Organization for Women:
´President Obama, where
are the Women?´

Daily Caller, by Caroline May

Original Article

Posted By:sparky86, 1/10/2013 8:07:46 PM

The nation’s leading liberal women’s group, the National Organization for Women, is demanding to know why President Barack Obama has failed to make more high-profile appointments of women to his administration. “President Obama has made a number of high-profile appointments recently — four at last count — and they are all white men,” NOW said in a blast email to supporters Thursday evening, with the subject line, “President Obama, Where are the Women?” The organization noted that while groups like NOW hoped United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice would succeed

Comments:
The hope & change still can´t seem to come through for this administration´s supporters... It really is unbelievable that they fooled everyone into reelection --- of course back then Romney was the bad guy with his "binders full of women." Either way it shouldn´t be about gender or race but about the best person for the job.... who to root for in this scenario?!

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: halfnorsk, 1/10/2013 8:16:17 PM     (No. 9109858)

Hell hath no fury like a feminist scorned. Go get ´im girls. I´ll bring the popcorn.


Reply 2 - Posted by: RCflyer98, 1/10/2013 8:17:30 PM     (No. 9109861)

Looks like Obama has "binders" full of white guys? You voted/supported this POS, how do you like it so far?


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: quark, 1/10/2013 8:19:14 PM     (No. 9109865)

Soooo, there were no women or blacks that were ´qualified´ for the job?

I also noticed how many Democrat black senators there are.... why is that?


Reply 4 - Posted by: Coy860, 1/10/2013 8:19:46 PM     (No. 9109867)

They are out there pulling weeds in Michelle vegetable garden..s/


Reply 5 - Posted by: PoliticalJunky, 1/10/2013 8:20:10 PM     (No. 9109868)

The women voted for Obama He doesn´t need them now.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Northcross, 1/10/2013 8:24:58 PM     (No. 9109873)

Obama´s Reply: Stow it, you hags. You helped get me elected. That is all that matters.

Basically the same response he has given to gays, blacks, Catholics, Jews, Hispanics, Unions, and middle class taxpayers.


Reply 7 - Posted by: uno, 1/10/2013 8:25:25 PM     (No. 9109874)

It´s just a muslim thang...


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: noddy, 1/10/2013 8:25:57 PM     (No. 9109875)

Why am I not surprised to see them concerned about themselves. To heck with all the oppressed women around the world, you know, the ones being raped, stoned and shot simply for being female.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Chuzzles, 1/10/2013 8:26:39 PM     (No. 9109878)

Not a peep from the NAG gang over all the horrific personal attacks on women in predominantly muslim countries in the last couple of years, but boy howdy let President Fingerman get below the quota amount of women in the WH and the howler monkeys come out in force!


Reply 10 - Posted by: wtm, 1/10/2013 8:27:21 PM     (No. 9109879)

The unveiling of Obama has started and his march toward his Islamic way of thinking. Under Islam, and sharia law, there are NO women allowed to make decisions !!!


Reply 11 - Posted by: Crosscut, 1/10/2013 8:34:18 PM     (No. 9109887)

Chumps, you done been played.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Anner40, 1/10/2013 8:35:25 PM     (No. 9109890)

Back to the kitchens you hussies....


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: Italiano, 1/10/2013 8:48:09 PM     (No. 9109906)

As Luca Brasi would have put it: "May your next Administration be a masculine Administration."

Hat tip to John Podhoretz.


Reply 14 - Posted by: JAN, 1/10/2013 9:00:52 PM     (No. 9109922)

He is laughing in the face of every single fool who voted for him.


Reply 15 - Posted by: john56, 1/10/2013 9:01:37 PM     (No. 9109924)

Head NAG, in public: ´President Obama, where
are the Women?´

Head NAG (Natl. Organization of Gals, hat tip to El Rushbo), in private: ´Ok, we did our duty. We won´t complain no more, Master!´


Reply 16 - Posted by: jond, 1/10/2013 9:07:39 PM     (No. 9109928)

Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free?


Reply 17 - Posted by: seamusm, 1/10/2013 9:10:37 PM     (No. 9109931)

As if this is a surprise?


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Ida Lou Pino, 1/10/2013 9:12:19 PM     (No. 9109933)

Ummm - - the wimmen are with the Father Of The Year - -

- - but they´ll be here as soon as they get back up on their feet.


Reply 19 - Posted by: Davids918, 1/10/2013 9:19:05 PM     (No. 9109938)

It´s not just that he´s lacking in women, but the official statement by the Spokesperson, said "we base our decision on qualifications".

Guess, they ran out of qualified women, in their opinion and judgement.


Reply 20 - Posted by: montanabound, 1/10/2013 9:58:32 PM     (No. 9109970)

Is Kathleen Supercilious the only woman left?


Reply 21 - Posted by: BaseballFan, 1/10/2013 10:39:25 PM     (No. 9110013)

New level for irrelevancy, brought to you by NOW.

Wanna tick ´em off even more?

"Hey, NOW members! Remember Sarah Palin?"


Reply 22 - Posted by: Fosterdad, 1/10/2013 11:36:33 PM     (No. 9110067)

What did you expect, you ninnies? He threw his grandmother and his pastor under the bus, why wouldn´t he do the same the you?

You got him elected twice. You have served your purpose. Now he doesn´t need you any more.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: LadyVet, 1/11/2013 12:23:38 AM     (No. 9110094)

Yeah, sure. He´ll still respect you in the morning.


Reply 24 - Posted by: Trigger2, 1/11/2013 5:08:55 AM     (No. 9110176)

It took NOW 4 years to recognize this? Doesn´t say much for them, does it.


Reply 25 - Posted by: civilservant, 1/11/2013 10:46:43 AM     (No. 9110662)

He prefers men.



Post Reply   Close thread 718477




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "sparky86"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "sparky86"



Krauthammer: Obama IRS
scandal statement ´a holding
operation,´ ´the absolute minimum´
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor    Original Article
Posted By: sparky86- 5/15/2013 8:50:09 PM     Post Reply
Immediately following President Barack Obama’s remarks on Wednesday about the current scandal embroiling the Internal Revenue Service, Washington Post columnist Charles Krauthammer reacted by downplaying the gesture. “That was a holding operation,” Krauthammer said. “That was the absolute minimum he could have done. He relieves one person. He obviously had to. He had to relieve at least one person. And he chose, of course , the acting commissioner. But, I would have expected more. The other actions he announced are up to now meaningless. Obama and this administration have said a hundred times they’re going to

George Will on IRS Tea
Party attacks: ´How stupid do
they think we are?´
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor    Original Article
Posted By: sparky86- 5/13/2013 9:48:19 AM     Post Reply
George Will joined the chorus talking about the prospect of impeachment for President Barack Obama after last week’s admission from the Internal Revenue Service that it had targeted groups with the phrases “tea party” or “patriot” in their tax-exempt applications for extra audits . On Sunday’s broadcast of ABC’s “This Week with George Stephanopoulos,” Will proposed a scenario wherein the Bush administration had targeted groups with the word “progressive” in their names and concluded the situation would be much different in terms of expressions of outrage. “Mr. Hicks, when he was in Libya, said his jaw dropped

Brit Hume: ‘No way’ for
Hillary Clinton to escape
responsibility for Benghazi
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor    Original Article
Posted By: sparky86- 5/7/2013 8:06:25 PM     Post Reply
Senior Fox News political analyst Brit Hume laid out why this week’s testimony on last September’s terrorist attack on the U.S. consulate in Libya could be problematic for former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Hume, speaking on Tuesday’s broadcast of “America Live,” said there is no feasible way for her to escape any responsibility since she had to be involved in the crafting of the talking points that came out after the attack that resulted in the deaths of four Americans, including then-U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens. "There’s really no way for her to escape responsibility for this if this

NY Times makes same
arguments for immigration reform
they did ahead of 1986 amnesty
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor    Original Article
Posted By: sparky86- 4/28/2013 11:16:50 AM     Post Reply
Back in the 1980s, the country faced a familiar dilemma to the one it faces today — the border was insecure and too many illegal immigrants had moved into the United States. At the time, the proposed solution was a bill crafted by then Wyoming Republican Sen. Alan Simpson and Kentucky Democratic Rep. Romano Mazzoli. Signed into law by President Ronald Reagan in 1986, it instantly granted 3 million illegal immigrants legal status. Yet a little over 30 years later the problem has returned, with more than 11 million illegal immigrants now in the United States.

Bill O´Reilly attacks MSNBC´s
Alex Wagner: ´Beyond stupid´
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor    Original Article
Posted By: sparky86- 4/26/2013 7:24:16 AM     Post Reply
“The O’Reilly Factor” host Bill O’Reilly on Thursday criticized those seeking to downplay the role of Islamic extremism in the Boston Marathon bombings. “There is no question that many on the left are very disappointed the two suspects in the terror bombing are Muslim,” O’Reilly said. “And it is sad to say that many in the Muslim world will never believe the Tsarnaev brothers committed the atrocity.” O’Reilly referred specifically to comments by Zubeidat Tsarnev, the mother of suspected Boston Marathon bombers Dzohkhar and Tamerlan Tsarnev. “Now, there is nothing on Earth that can make that woman accept reality

Pat Buchanan calls ´Gang of 8´ proposal
acts of ´madness,´ ´suicidal folly´ for GOP
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor    Original Article
Posted By: sparky86- 4/22/2013 4:56:20 PM     Post Reply
Conservative columnist Pat Buchanan says the “Gang of Eight” immigration reform bill will, if passed, threaten national security and destroy the Republican Party’s ability to compete on a national level. Buchanan, author of “Suicide of a Superpower: Will America Survive to 2025?” told radio host Laura Ingraham on Monday that passing a “blanket pardon” of illegal immigrants would be “an act of madness,” particularly in the wake of last week’s terrorist attacks in Boston. “It’s been one week since something like 178 to 180 Americans — three of them murdered — but 178 injured, maimed and wounded by two

Joe Scarborough: Republicans
that filibuster gun control ´put
rapists´ rights over parents´ rights´
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor    Original Article
Posted By: sparky86- 4/8/2013 11:05:50 AM     Post Reply
On Monday’s broadcast of MSNBC “Morning Joe,” host Joe Scarborough voiced his agreement with Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain, who on Sunday’s “Face the Nation” on CBS questioned those Republicans who are threatening a filibuster on pending gun control legislation. Scarborough said such a filibuster would be an example of the GOP putting “rapists’ rights ahead over parents’ rights.” “[I] tell you what, Richard Haass, I saw John McCain there,” Scarborough said. “And I’m hopeful. Because, you know, there are a lot of guys out there in the Senate and they are going out because it’s a free shot.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Bystanders in their own fate
53 replie(s)
Orange County Register (Ca), by Mark Steyn    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/24/2013 5:32:34 PM     Post Reply
On Wednesday, Drummer Lee Rigby of the Royal Regiment of Fusiliers, a man who had served Queen and country honorably in the hell of Helmand Province in Afghanistan, emerged from his barracks on Wellington Street, named after the Duke thereof, in southeast London. Minutes later, he was hacked to death in broad daylight and in full view of onlookers by two men with machetes who crowed "Allahu Akbar!" as they dumped his carcass in the middle of the street like so much roadkill. As grotesque as this act of savagery was, the aftermath was even more unsettling

Benghazi and Obama´s
Ambition to Be U.N. SecGen

53 replie(s)
American Thinker, by James Lewis    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 5/25/2013 9:20:44 AM     Post Reply
Washington rumor has it that Obama wants to be U.N. Secretary General. There are several reasons that make that likely, and if it´s true, it throws new light on a lot of Obama´s oddities -- including his Royalty Bows, his Apology Tours, his Muslim Sellout, and the Benghazi Cover-Up. But first -- why would Obama be planning to become the chief of the U.N. before he has even finished his second term?

Mark Levin: "RINO" Issa Didn´t
Investigate IRS Before Because
He "Despises The Tea Party"

45 replie(s)
Real Clear Politics, by Ian Schwartz    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/24/2013 5:38:38 PM     Post Reply
MARK LEVIN: So why didn´t Chairman Issa hold an investigative hearing a year ago? Why didn´t Chairman Camp, all Republicans, hold an investigative hearing a year ago, and all the other tripping over themselves right now? I´ll tell you why. Because the establishment Republicans, the RINO Republicans, despise the Tea Party. They despise the conservative movement. We exist to be managed, to be shuttled to the polling place, to vote for their candidates. The Karl Roves of the world, and all the rest of them. They fight us in the primaries, they fight us at the grassroots.

Obama Asks Staff to
Start Cc’ing Him on Stuff

37 replie(s)
New Yorker, by Andy Borowitz    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/24/2013 5:31:36 AM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON —In a dramatic departure from existing White House procedures, President Obama requested today that his staff start cc’ing him on stuff. “Look, I know a lot of you think I’m really busy and you don’t want to bother me,” the President reportedly told his staff in an Oval Office meeting. “But cc me anyway. It’s good for me to keep up on what’s going on around here.” “It’s not good when I turn on the news and they’re talking about something at the White House and I’m like, whoa, when did that happen?”

Boy Scouts Change Membership
Guidelines to Allow Homosexuals

30 replie(s)
Cybercast News Service, by Penny Starr    Original Article
Posted By: Maryland_Patriot- 5/24/2013 10:01:34 AM     Post Reply
The Boy Scouts of America (BSA) have reversed their longstanding membership guidelines to allow homosexuals to join the organization. In an email to CNSNews.com, the BSA public affairs office said the vote on the resolution to “remove the restriction denying membership to youth on the basis of sexual orientation alone” was passed with 61.44 percent in favor and 38.56 percent opposed. “For 103 years, the Boy Scouts of America has been a part of the fabric of this nation, with a focus on working together to deliver the nation’s foremost youth program of character development and values-based leadership training,”

The Dots Already Lead To
Obama In The IRS Scandal

30 replie(s)
Investor´s Business Daily, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/24/2013 7:11:39 PM     Post Reply
Abuse Of Power: Any scandal investigation that expects a "Eureka!" moment, a White House e-mail, or Oval Office smoking gun will be misguided. In fact, the dots are already connected directly to the president. Barack Obama is not foolish enough to have a tape recording system hidden in his desk. And his administration staff are not careless enough to send one another incriminating e-mails. If the president was behind the IRS unlawfully harassing conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status, we can be sure the communications were all sotto voce and in persona, like any good Chicago political operator.

Woolwich attack prompts fears of
backlash against British Muslims

29 replie(s)
Guardian [UK], by Sam Jones, Ben Quinn and Conal Urquhart    Original Article
Posted By: NorthernDog- 5/24/2013 3:04:31 PM     Post Reply
The murder of a soldier in south London on Wednesday has prompted fears of a backlash against British Muslims after the English Defence League staged an impromptu rally in the capital and two mosques were attacked. The BNP leader, Nick Griffin, has also reacted to the killing with provocative tweets calling for a protest in Woolwich and claiming the crime is the result of "mass immigration". Farooq Murad of the Muslim Council of Britain said the EDL´s rally in London on Wednesday night was cause for concern. "When attacks like these happen there´s always the danger of far-right extremism


Post Reply   Close thread 718477





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~