A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Low-Info Voters Just Not
Interested In Politics
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Low-Info Voters Just Not
Interested In Politics

Irish Examiner USA, by Alicia Colon

Original Article

Posted By:abuela10, 1/10/2013 6:43:28 AM

How many times have you tried to have a serious conversation about current events only to have your listeners say, "I´m not interested in politics"? These are the low-info voters that the Republicans have never been able to communicate with but the Democrats know exactly how to reach them. That is why they concentrate their connections in the mainstream media and Hollywood and why these voters know more about the Kardashians than what the fiscal cliff means to the economy or where Benghazi is. It´s also why these voters tune out boring Republicans who continue to blah, blah, blah

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Spidey, 1/10/2013 7:06:55 AM     (No. 9108401)

Tome,low info voters are really low motivation voters whi intentionally blind themselves to reality so their government freebies keep flowing.They watch lunatic shows like MSNBC because they basically condone their culture of laziness and government dependency.Student loans have become a huge new leg of the welfare state where lazy people go through the motions of getting educated,when it´s actually just an easy money grab to avoid working. These people can become career college students piling up worthless degrees to avoid paying student loans back.This is just the latest leftist breakthrough trap to drag in armies of new voters. You have people at an 8th grade reading level going to college.The courses have been dumbed down,making the almost impossible to fail.

Where´s the job market for african american,latino or islamic studies?It´s all subjective education where you write a thesis agreeing with the professor to get a passing grade.
In the meantime we have to dole out thousands of work visas to foreigners to fill skill positions.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Crosscut, 1/10/2013 7:10:10 AM     (No. 9108403)

Until the GOP can reach these folks they are in a hopeless situation, especially electing a Republican president. Bush may have been the last. However, as African-Americans appear to only vote by skin color and only Democrat, if the Democrats run a white person for president the blacks will stay home. Then perhaps the GOP has a chance.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: globalwarmer, 1/10/2013 7:10:27 AM     (No. 9108406)

The media are always on the lookout for a rising GOP/conservative spokesman and then, once identified, vilify him/her with spurious and never ending attacks....right out of Rules for Radicals.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Rather Read, 1/10/2013 7:19:06 AM     (No. 9108418)

This is an excellent article and it states what I have been thinking for some time now. However, Ms Colon leaves out one thing. If the GOP does find an articulate spokesman, he (or she) had better be squeakier than squeaky clean. The MSM, which has no interest in The Won´s college transcripts, will pounce on the least little thing the the spokesman´s past to tar him as a racist, sexist or whatever -ist is the current demon.


Reply 5 - Posted by: god of irony, 1/10/2013 7:42:13 AM     (No. 9108442)

Maybe the RNC and it´s candidates should change the way the spend their money. Instead of waiting until the last minute and running non stop negative ads. They should run fewer ads over a longer period of time that are light hearted and in a clever way points out why conservativism beats socialism.


Reply 6 - Posted by: mickeymat, 1/10/2013 7:45:15 AM     (No. 9108447)

In addition to those who are not interested in politics we have those who think they are informed because they read the local paper and watch ABC, CBS and NBC. It is an insult to them when you imply they are uninformed and when given the opportunity must vote to affirm their previous stupid vote as a matter of pride.


Reply 7 - Posted by: M2, 1/10/2013 7:45:33 AM     (No. 9108450)

When it comes to who makes up the base of the party, the GOP establishment is as low-info as those who voted for Obama.

Now that is scary.

So if Democrat targeting of the moron vote worked, and it did, how does the GOP attract that same moron vote when the media suppresses our message? When it´s not cool to be a conservative, how do we make it cool? Because cool is what this generation and the one before and after it is all about?

If America as founded isn´t destroyed in the interim, this is going to take years of public school retraining to get this toxicity out of our culture.

I do not have high hopes in this lifetime for anything other than secession.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Rakasha, 1/10/2013 7:49:31 AM     (No. 9108457)

I´m sorry to disagree but the GOP establishment are not low on information, they are high on control; and they can´t control independent thinkers like Ronald Reagan or the original conservative base or the TEA party folk. That is why they ridicule, disparage and discredit those who do not toe the line.

They know perfectly well who the base was and who they want the base to be. They are certain that they have a lock hold on the original base, after all, where else are they going to go? That is why they feel free to ignore and disparage the ideas and principles of the past (Conservatism? Let´s just redefine it.) while wooing and catering to a new, more dependant and maleable constituency.

I do not believe the Republican establishment want another Ronald Reagan. I remember the condescension and mockery they treated him with. They did the same thing to Sarah Palin, only far more vehemently and effectively after they learned their lesson with Reagan. It took them a long time to regain control of the party and they do not intend to lose it again without a fight, especially to a bunch of unwashed, uneducated, unenlightened rubes like ´the people´.


Reply 9 - Posted by: garyhope, 1/10/2013 8:09:40 AM     (No. 9108475)

Why don´t we change their names from "Low-Info Voters" to "High Suicidal Voters" or "American Culture Killer Voters" or just plain stupid?


Reply 10 - Posted by: TrueBlueWfan, 1/10/2013 8:14:49 AM     (No. 9108482)

#4, it doesn´t matter how squeaky clean our spokesperson is, the left invents scandal against anyone that shows promise on our side. Sarah Palin and Mitt Romney come to mind.

We have come across this attitude, this disdain for politics, with our own grown kids. They don´t want to hear it, they think it is beneath them, and just Republicans trashing the other guys for sport. I think they voted the right way, but to interest them is next to impossible.

I like to tell them, "You may not be interested in politics, but politics sure are interested in you."


Reply 11 - Posted by: olcap, 1/10/2013 8:16:09 AM     (No. 9108484)

I would suggest that it´s more like people are fed up with the ONE party system that is disguised as a two party system, and the lunatic fringe at either extreme.


Reply 12 - Posted by: 49 Ford, 1/10/2013 8:40:36 AM     (No. 9108517)

I know many people like those poster #6 describes. They watch 20 minutes of "the news" most evenings and think themselves well informed. If you suggest they might not understand what´s really going on they become insulted and tune you out. It is those voters along with the hard core honey boo-boos who are taking our country to perdition. Damned if I know how to reach them.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: OhMy, 1/10/2013 8:43:33 AM     (No. 9108523)

Excellent article, we have a lot of work to do. Any electorate that would allow any of these things that are going on to happen is degenerate.


Reply 14 - Posted by: Keekng, 1/10/2013 8:49:32 AM     (No. 9108533)

Low information voters watch Honey Boo Boo and MSNBC


Reply 15 - Posted by: lilo, 1/10/2013 9:32:01 AM     (No. 9108619)

I´ve never watched Honey BooBoo, but I would be willing to bet it is both more truthful and entertaining than MSNBC.


Reply 16 - Posted by: LZK, 1/10/2013 9:35:02 AM     (No. 9108627)

Doom and gloom.....

Just be patient -- stop with the sky is falling.

The new obamataxes will hit the weak/minded as well and then alllllll the welfare in the world won´t put down their response.....

LZK


Reply 17 - Posted by: Grambo, 1/10/2013 9:38:45 AM     (No. 9108636)

Can we have two Parties, the Honey Boo Boos and the Conservatives, two elections, and two sets of laws, one for each of them?


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: jasper, 1/10/2013 9:39:51 AM     (No. 9108639)

High info voters with a modicum of brains are getting fatigued across the entire political spectrum The normal political structure and self interest of the past fifty years has become so huge lately and the government has become so controlling that it is no longer what we remember. Yet pork and re-election still dominates political thinking, across the political spectrum. With Obama imitating Hugo Chavez, the USA. as we know it. is approaching huge trouble. All we can do is look out for ourselves and our young family. That´s why many Americans do not care about current politics.


Reply 19 - Posted by: Blue-Z-Anna, 1/10/2013 9:54:09 AM     (No. 9108667)

The systematic destruction of ALL promising conservative leaders is a crime against humanity. It´s compound damage is that it dissuades the next generation of great leaders from subjecting themselves from this predictable barrage and a ´fixed´ system.

That old tree of liberty is looking mighty DRY to me.


Reply 20 - Posted by: mrduc, 1/10/2013 10:00:23 AM     (No. 9108680)

Since the voting machines have been rigged, none of this matters. Our election process has been corrupted. Until that gets fixed, you can forget about any and all conversations about who the voters are, low-info voters, honey googoo, all of it.


Reply 21 - Posted by: smcchk, 1/10/2013 10:20:06 AM     (No. 9108738)

The liberal message seeps into the subconscious of low-information voters through the entertainment media and entertainment commentary, that they think is news. We have no such outlets for that. But we also never come up with good sound bites! That is what we need. I estimate you have about 10 seconds to get someone´s attention. We need to grab these voters in those 10 seconds. Keep the message simple!


Reply 22 - Posted by: The Patriot Code, 1/10/2013 10:20:13 AM     (No. 9108740)


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: Eheu Fugaces, 1/10/2013 10:34:21 AM     (No. 9108795)

#8 - Good analysis. Which is why we can call the "moderate" wing of the GOP the New Whigs. They are racing toward complete political irrelevance as an independent party. They are beginning to consolidate their position as a sort of genteel, reluctant auxiliary of the Democrats. They have no ideas, can´t plan for the future, and can´t manage anything effectively (the Romney campaign is exhibit A.)


Reply 24 - Posted by: coldoc, 1/10/2013 10:37:20 AM     (No. 9108808)

I see little cause for optimism, as (thanks you ron white), you can´t fix stupid. These obama voters will be told the tax increases and coming injustices are the fault of the evil republicans and they will believe it.


Reply 25 - Posted by: dman, 1/10/2013 10:38:04 AM     (No. 9108812)

How to get their attention:

Shut down the government.


Reply 26 - Posted by: Butch59, 1/10/2013 10:40:49 AM     (No. 9108825)

My own belief is that this country, as presently made up, is going to crash. Period. Into dust. What will rise up from those ashes is anyone´s guess. And one huge reason for this is that this country has lost it´s will to work. In it´s early years, people yearned to be free and work to sustain themselves and their families. Just stay out of their way and allow them to do so. In today´s world, we simply have far too many people that are lazy. Call it what it is. They want to sit around and sit on their fat behinds and yell about how "the govmint" is supposed to take care of them. And there are a lot of politicians that are willing to do just that. All they ask is your vote. For life time. And the votes of your children and grandchildren. Forever.

Viva la revolution!


Reply 27 - Posted by: The Patriot Code, 1/10/2013 10:41:22 AM     (No. 9108828)

This High Info Voter is becoming way, way less politically inclined. As of the morning of November 7th, I rarely send any emails out to my list of friends, rarely watch Fox News programming anymore, and rarely listen to any radio programs other than Rush.

I still read the news, but no where near as ravenously as before 11/6. I find myself listening to music much more than I have in years. And I am listening to a variety of music and it is all OLD music. Music that was created when America was really America. Pre-0bama Entitlement, Low Info America. Whether it´s Ella Fitzgerald, Elvis, Johnny Cash, or 70´s Rock, I like listening to music that was created by people who never knew about the current plague that would befall our nation.

And bourbon tastes better than it ever has.

I am of the opinion that politics absolutely will not get us out of the mess we are in. I am exhausted by the stupidity of the people in this nation, and mortified at the blatant corruption that goes unchecked by the horrible msm.

I am 100% committed to providing for and protecting my family, and am off my soap box as far as trying to convince anybody of anything.


Reply 28 - Posted by: RancherJack, 1/10/2013 11:05:17 AM     (No. 9108896)

Gimme my free phone and I´ll pull the lever

No phone, no love


Reply 29 - Posted by: Arby, 1/10/2013 11:11:39 AM     (No. 9108913)

The dirty little secret is that many of the low-info voters are putative intellectuals and opinion leaders. I´ve met a slew of college professors who know next to nothing about the actual details of political policies, actions, etc.


Reply 30 - Posted by: Dixie, 1/10/2013 1:07:03 PM     (No. 9109178)

The fastest way I can think of to turn this country around if for the conservatives in the Republican party to become very, VERY good at voter fraud.

Once Republicans win surprising Senate seats in places where they shouldn´t have, two good things will happen:
1) Republicans will have the Senate and can, with the House, do much to mitigate problems in the country...including increasing our drilling for oil.
2) The Democrats will FINALLY work with the Republicans to eliminate voter fraud.


Reply 31 - Posted by: johngalt1, 1/10/2013 1:24:02 PM     (No. 9109216)

Let’s stop using the phrase “low information voters” to describe people who are essentially Democratic Party drones.

Back in 1982, John Naisbet wrote a book entitled “Megatrends” in which he said “We are drowning in information but starved for knowledge.” This was a full decade before the internet became a vast, instant information resource for billions of people.

Today, if you lack information, it’s because you don’t want it. People who decline the opportunity to become informed are ignorant by choice. They believe they already have all the information they need. They don’t want to be educated, they want to be entertained.

So-called “low information voters” are really drones remotely guided on election day by the formidable Democratic Party machine, which is very skillful at pushing their buttons by “spinning” issues to reinforce drones´ preexisting mindsets.

It’s been said that if a lie is repeated often enough people will believe it. Can the same be said for the truth? If so, why is it that when a politician tells the truth it’s referred to by the press as a gaffe?

Republicans have allowed the left to define them as the party of the rich, a coalition of un-hip, humorless, intolerant, callous people stuck in the past who are mean to children, the poor, women, blacks, Latinos, gays, lesbians, bisexuals, teachers, atheists, Muslims, leftist dictators, unions, and dogs.

This will remain the case until the GOP embraces the marketing nuances that drive popular culture.


Reply 32 - Posted by: 6079 Smith, W, 1/10/2013 1:29:01 PM     (No. 9109223)

Low Information Voter = LIV = 54 in Roman Numerals. So, I will call them 54s.


Reply 33 - Posted by: joew9, 1/10/2013 2:03:02 PM     (No. 9109276)

I wonder how the low interest voters would like it if I, a disinterested non-football fan, made the rules about the game. Or if perhaps I decided the next topics of discussion on the Oprah show or whatever it´s equivalent is today.


Reply 34 - Posted by: jojobo, 1/10/2013 2:57:35 PM     (No. 9109399)

Had to laugh. I misread it as low-life voters. When I realized my mistake, it didn´t change the story for me at all.


Reply 35 - Posted by: Charactercounts, 1/10/2013 3:00:55 PM     (No. 9109404)

#3, you´re exactly right. Any articulate spokesperson for conservative values is quickly attacked and destroyed--or, as they used to say in spy movies, neutralized.


Reply 36 - Posted by: KTWO, 1/10/2013 3:31:01 PM     (No. 9109446)

Who are such voters?

Let´s consider one type. Those who are live solely on entitlements.

You are immune from nearly all taxes. You don´t have enough income or property.

If you never expect to have another job you don´t care about the unemployment rate. Or whether you can find a job.

Life doesn´t change much in a recession.

To you the national debt and deficit seem abstract. Neither seems to affect you.

OTOH inflation is not abstract. It will hurt if it comes. But it hasn´t hurt much yet so why worry. And won´t the entitlements rise as prices rise?

If your relatives and/or friends cannot find work that affects you. But maybe they live as you live, on entitlements.

And more government spending means you may get free cell phones, cable,internet, better subsidized housing, better medical care. Better this, better that.


Reply 37 - Posted by: lencu255, 1/10/2013 3:47:58 PM     (No. 9109478)

Whoever agrees with this point of view is 100% wrong. Propaganda works just fine. Yes, the sheeple are dumb, they are selfish, they hate, they are jealous, but
They have point of view and it is formulated by mainstream media, commie education and entertainment and to some extent, facts. That are commies who are giving them 99 weeks of unemployment, food stamps and welfare, and who are telling them that as soon as they will expropriate the RICH, everybody will be RICH!
And what are we doing? Nothing! Is there any benefit for the country that WE, conservatives, are listening to rush or watching hannity (I personally don´t do it anymore)?
We need our, conservative mainstream media in which we can propagandize the truth and educate the sheeple. Otherwise we will hear those not smart remarks that drones/leeches/sheeple don´t have opinions. It is not true - they do. We just don´t agree with them and they are against common sense.


Reply 38 - Posted by: Javelin, 1/10/2013 3:51:37 PM     (No. 9109481)

May I step out of the line a bit here? We need to be honest:
1) There are too many conservatives (and reactionaries and libertarians, etc.) who confuse intensity with success. We were intense. We lost. We have to reach the persuadable and not count on stirring each others´ souls.
2) There are people in the GOP who are not aware that "all men are created equal." I have seen a few remarks on this site (which I regard as the home of the brightest posters) that would make me uneasy if I were black or Jewish or female, etc. Those remarks are few, but we must avoid them.
3) There is a positive action that could be taken: harken to the Ev and Charlie Show or the later Ev and Jerry Show when the GOP leaders in the Senate and House had a weekly press conference. It blunted the power of the Presidential bully pulpit to some extent. Let´s try it again. I´d be for Senator Rubio as "Mario" and an articulate woman from the House. Finding someone ready to replace Charlie Halleck or Jerry Ford in the lineup should not be difficult.


Reply 39 - Posted by: absalom, 1/10/2013 3:53:23 PM     (No. 9109485)

#11 is correct. We have a republicrat duopoly and more importantly, the R Est. is viscerally hostile to conservative values. A true conservative party would never, ever consider jackasses like Landon, Wilkie, Dewey, Stassen, the Bush buffoons, Dole,
McCain, Romney etc; as POTUS material.


Reply 40 - Posted by: chefrandy, 1/10/2013 3:55:27 PM     (No. 9109491)

I think #32 is on to a solution. If we get better than they do at cheating the system, they´ll finally have to work at reforming it. They continually say there´s no proof or its us or so difficult to get proper ID and with the complicit media we might as well get blamed for something we´re actually doing for a change.


Reply 41 - Posted by: srhcb, 1/10/2013 7:52:16 PM     (No. 9109825)

Let´s quit being PC and call them what they are; stupid voters.


Reply 42 - Posted by: uno, 1/10/2013 8:23:52 PM     (No. 9109871)

I call most of ´em two times stupid voters.
2008 & 2012



Post Reply   Close thread 718362




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "abuela10"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "abuela10"



Christie: Obama ´kept every
promise´ on Sandy aid
Associated Press, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: abuela10- 4/29/2013 8:55:53 AM     Post Reply
HIGHLANDS, NJ — New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie said Monday that President Obama "has kept every promise he´s made" about helping the state recover from Hurricane Sandy. Speaking on MSNBC´s "Morning Joe" program on the 6-month anniversary of the deadly storm, the Republican governor said presidential politics were the last thing on his mind as he toured storm-devastated areas with Obama last fall. "The president has kept every promise he´s made," said Christie, widely considered a potential candidate for the republican presidential nomination in 2016. "I think he´s done a good job. He kept his word."

How Twitter moves markets
Politico, by Dylan Byers    Original Article
Posted By: abuela10- 4/25/2013 1:36:53 PM     Post Reply
In the wake of this week´s false AP tweet about explosions at the White House, Bloomberg´s Jared Keller and Evan Applegate offer a look at how "false tweets" can move markets, sending stocks spiking or crashing in an instant. "The AP hack highlights the potential pitfalls of relying on social networks for tradable information, but false tweets have been affecting markets and companies for the past few years," they write. "In some cases the impact of false tweets can be immediate. On August 6, 2012: A Twitter account claiming to be that of Russian Interior Minister Vladimir Kolokoltsev

Tamerlan Tsarnaev and Family
Received Welfare
Weekly Standard, by Daniel Halper    Original Article
Posted By: abuela10- 4/24/2013 7:30:01 AM     Post Reply
Tamerlan Tsarnaev was on welfare, sponsored by tax payers. Tsarnaev, now dead, is suspected of bombing the Boston Marathon last week. "Marathon bombings mastermind Tamerlan Tsarnaev was living on taxpayer-funded state welfare benefits even as he was delving deep into the world of radical anti-American Islamism, the Herald has learned," reports the Boston Herald. "State officials confirmed last night that Tsarnaev, slain in a raging gun battle with police last Friday, was receiving benefits along with his wife, Katherine Russell Tsarnaev, and their 3-year-old daughter.

How American Muslims Can
Respond to Boston
Daily Beast, by Asra Q. Nomani    Original Article
Posted By: abuela10- 4/24/2013 7:20:15 AM     Post Reply
“He looks like me,” my son, Shibli, 10, said as we looked at a photo of a young Dzhokhar Tsarnaev flash upon the TV screen Friday night. Indeed, with his innocent eyes and rumple of dark curly hair, he did. As an American, a Muslim, a mother, and an aunt to a nephew on the cusp of manhood, my heart just broke for yet another boy lost in our Muslim community, taking with him the lives of others. Enough, enough, enough, I say, with the CYA—Cover Your A**—strategy in our Muslim communities.

Maher: Mayor Bloomberg ´Makes Me
Want To Join Tea Party
And Marry Ann Coulter´
Breitbart TV, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: abuela10- 4/4/2013 9:22:56 AM     Post Reply
JIMMY KIMMEL, HOST: Mayor Bloomberg is somebody that… BILL MAHER: [Sighs] Ohh. KIMMEL: Now, what do you think of his efforts to protect us from carbonated beverages and the like? BILL MAHER: I don´t like it. You know, I think it gives liberals a bad name. I really do. It makes liberals look like bullies who want to tell people what to do. And they never met a regulation they didn´t like. I mean, obviously we do have a problem with child obesity. I don´t want our children to be 99 percent Mountain Dew.

Outrage 101: Radical jailed
in slay now Columbia prof
New York Post, by Larry Celona and Dan Mangan    Original Article
Posted By: abuela10- 4/2/2013 8:09:46 AM     Post Reply
Former Weather Underground radical Kathy Boudin — who spent 22 years in prison for an armored-car robbery that killed two cops and a Brinks guard — now holds a prestigious adjunct professorship at Columbia University’s School of Social Work, The Post has learned. Boudin, 69, this year won another academic laurel — being named the Sheinberg Scholar-in-Residence at NYU Law School, where last month she gave a lecture on “the politics of parole and re-entry.” Boudin’s bounce-back into respectability after her 2003 parole comes to light a week before the release of Robert Redford’s movie

Not an April Fools’ joke:
Obama announces National
Financial Capability Month
Daily Caller, by Jim Treacher    Original Article
Posted By: abuela10- 4/2/2013 7:43:29 AM     Post Reply
This is a real thing that is really happening. For real. CNS News: President Barack Obama, who has increased the national debt by $53,377 per household, has proclaimed April “National Financial Capability Month,” during which his administration will do things such as teach young people “how to budget responsibly.” “I call upon all Americans to observe this month with programs and activities to improve their understanding of financial principles and practices,” Obama said in an official proclamation released Friday…



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Raindrops wash away
reeling O’s fake veneer

46 replie(s)
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM     Post Reply
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons

Obama a new Nixon?
Oh, get serious.

43 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/16/2013 10:54:51 PM     Post Reply
STANDING BEFORE reporters Thursday, President Obama declined an invitation to compare the recent scandals weighing down his administration with those that forced President Nixon to resign in 1974. So allow us to do the work for him: There is no comparison. Nixon, in a series of crimes that collectively came to be known as Watergate, directed from the White House and Justice Department a concerted campaign against those he perceived as political enemies, in the process subverting the FBI, the IRS, other government agencies and the electoral process to his nefarious purposes. Mr. Obama has done nothing of the kind.

Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting
Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.

41 replie(s)
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM     Post Reply
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,

NBC´s Todd Warns: If GOP
Investigates Obama Scandals,
´The Voters Will Punish Them´

36 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Kyle Drennen    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/16/2013 1:51:02 PM     Post Reply
On Thursday´s NBC Today, in a desperate attempt to deflect from the scandals engulfing the Obama administration, co-host Savannah Guthrie wondered: "I read a headline yesterday that said Republicans see blood in the water. That they see a president who´s very vulnerable politically. Is there a danger that they will overreach?" Chief White House correspondent Chuck Todd agreed with the slanted premise: "There is. I mean, that´s what happened to Republicans in 1998 with Bill Clinton.

When it rains, it pours: Ten
press conference take aways

35 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Jennifer Rubin    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/17/2013 4:52:42 AM     Post Reply
President Obama’s press conference in the rain was not a success, if by success, his supporters would mean an event which convinces anyone who doesn’t work for him that he’s getting ahead of the scandal deluge. The sight of a Marine holding an umbrella over his head only added to the weirdness of the event. So what did we learn? 1. He has full confidence in Attorney General Eric Holder, the man who purportedly recused himself (whenever) without putting it in writing (whatever). When asked about the untrammeled snooping on Associated Press reporters and editors,

Obama 47 minutes late for his press
conference; leaves reporters in the rain

34 replie(s)
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/16/2013 1:20:06 PM     Post Reply
“I look forward to taking some questions at tomorrow’s press conference,” President Obama said last night, after announcing the resignation of the acting IRS commissioner Steven Miller. The president scheduled a noon press conference today with Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan in honor of his visit. Reporters, however, found themselves waiting outside in the rain for Obama, who was 47 minutes late. Only New York Times reporter Mark Landler had an umbrella.

Fox’s Brit Hume: ‘Stupid’ For GOP
To Think Of Impeaching Obama Over
Recent Scandals

32 replie(s)
Mediaite, by Andrew Kirell    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 5:05:46 PM     Post Reply
Appearing on Laura Ingraham‘s radio show this afternoon, Fox News senior political analyst Brit Hume suggested some Republicans were “stupid” to consider impeachment of President Obama a viable response to the ongoing scandals regarding the Benghazi attacks, the IRS targeting of conservative groups, and the Justice Department secret seizure of AP phone records. Likely referring to some GOP lawmakers, including Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK) who has put impeachment on the table as an option for handling the Benghazi fallout, Ingraham asked Hume to comment on how some Republican leaders have “ran to the microphone” to suggest removal


Post Reply   Close thread 718362





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~