|
|
| |
Topic: Time for a balanced-
budget amendment |
Time for a balanced-
budget amendment
Washington Post, by George F. Will
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Dreadnought, 1/9/2013 10:46:06 PM
|
| “Even victors are by victories undone.” — John Dryden Democrats not allergic to arithmetic must know the cost of their “fiscal cliff” victory. When they flinched from allowing all of George W. Bush’s tax rates, especially those on middle-class incomes, to expire, liberalism lost its nerve and began what will be a long slide into ludicrousness. Those temporary rates were enacted in 2001, when only 28 House Democrats supported them, and in 2003, when only seven did. But with the “American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012” — did liberals think about that title?
|
 
Reply 1 - Posted by:
pearlyjo, 1/9/2013 10:56:24 PM (No. 9108145)
Amendment? What would a balanced-budget amendment mean to this administration and the Democrats in Congress? Seriously.
By the way, it´s time for another amendment: term limits on Congress.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
veritas, 1/9/2013 10:57:48 PM (No. 9108146)
No! [Beep] no!
Leave the Constitution alone.
The legislators who intentionally exempted themselves from prosecution for insider-trading crimes are hardly going to line up -- or hold the line on -- a balanced budget.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
earlybird, 1/9/2013 11:34:03 PM (No. 9108183)
Investor´s Business Daily is also carrying this story today.
Better headline?
"Democrats´ Loss Of Nerve Gives GOP An Opening"
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
SoCalGal, 1/9/2013 11:38:28 PM (No. 9108188)
Beware posting Replies based upon the headline (which is never written by the author of the article, and often reflects the source´s agenda).
Will knows that a balanced budget amendment has no chance of passing,
Still, Republicans, whose divisions cause Democratic gloating, could use a balanced budget amendment to divide Democrats who threw the remnants of their fiscal self-respect off the cliff.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
horacer, 1/10/2013 12:15:09 AM (No. 9108206)
Paul Simon would bring this up every year in the 90´s. It always got to 66 votes. It´s a stupid idea. Government’s indiscipline will always be incorrigible and shameless. Growth is the only answer. Unshackle capital and de-regulate. Those 82% who pay more in payroll taxes than income taxes are in for a rude awakening if we don´t adopt a pro growth agenda.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
KTWO, 1/10/2013 1:53:52 AM (No. 9108234)
Even if such an amendment passed I doubt Obama and the present Democrats in Washington would feel bound by it.
They grow ever closer to saying laws and the Constitution no longer limit them.
But we won´t get it anyway.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Muguy, 1/10/2013 2:17:10 AM (No. 9108243)
We did have a vote on this back when Poppy Bush said "read my lips"...
Representative Charlie Stenholm finally got a vote in the House on a balanced budget amendment and it fell only a very short handful of votes short....
That was the deal with the Devil to "cut the deficit"--all it did (and we have never learned this) is to trigger more wasteful spending! That only creates more spending!
Too bad Stenholm´s bill was defeated-- we have been and will be paying for that debt forever with the value of our dollar going down every day now....
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Sunhan65, 1/10/2013 8:50:08 AM (No. 9108534)
When in the course of human events...
There is an amendment process within the Constitution for a reason--to remedy profound defects in American governance and, most important, to protect its free citizens from the federal government. The United States Federal Government is bankrupting the present and looting the future. If it is not stopped, it will destroy our republic. We cannot allow that. Most U.S. state constitutions mandate balanced budgets. The federal government should live within the same limitations.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
|
Petraeus’s role in drafting Benghazi
talking points raises questions
|
|
Washington Post, by Scott Wilson and Karen DeYoung
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 11:03:01 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The controversy over the Obama administration’s response to the Benghazi attack last year began at a meeting over coffee on Capitol Hill three days after the assault. It was at this informal session with the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence that the ranking Democrat asked David H. Petraeus, who was CIA director at the time, to ensure that committee members did not inadvertently disclose classified information when talking to the news media about the attack. “We had some new members on the committee, and we knew the press would be very aggressive on this, so we didn’t want
|
With more clarity, White House
adds to confusion on IRS
|
|
Washington Post, by Dan Balz
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:59:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
It is never good for an administration when a front-page newspaper article about an ongoing controversy begins as follows: “The White House offered a new account Monday of how and when it learned .?.?. ” That’s what readers of The Post awoke to on Tuesday. In trying to contain the controversy and protect President Obama, White House officials have only added to questions about what happened. Until this week, the story of how White House officials learned that the Internal Revenue Service was targeting conservative groups was fairly straightforward. White House counsel Kathryn Ruemmler was notified in late April
|
In AP, Rosen investigations,
government makes
criminals of reporters
|
|
Washington Post, by Dana Milbank
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:56:21 PM
Post Reply
|
|
There are various reasons you might not care about the Obama administration’s spying on journalist James Rosen and labeling him a “co-conspirator and/or aider and abettor” in an espionage case. Liberals may not be particularly bothered because the targeted journalist works for Fox News. Conservatives may not be concerned because of their antipathy toward the news media generally. And the general public certainly doesn’t have much patience for journalists’ whining. But here’s why you should care — and why this case, along with the administration’s broad snooping into Associated Press phone records, is more serious than the other supposed
|
| |
|
|
White House meltdown: A truth deficit
|
|
Washington Post, by Jennifer Rubin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:53:11 PM
Post Reply
|
|
There seems to be bipartisan consensus that whatever the White House is doing to fend off scandal is making things worse. Howard Fineman sounds a lot like Right Turn these days: “White House aides are tempting fate with their reluctant, piecemeal and contradictory disclosures of what they knew and when they knew it, especially about a report on the Internal Revenue Service’s 18-month effort to target tea party and other conservative groups for special scrutiny.” The constantly shifting stories from Jay Carney and the IRS dissembling and pleas of ignorance only heighten concern that there has been serious wrongdoing.
|
|
A Crack in the IRS Dam
|
|
Power Line, by John Hinderaker
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:50:44 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The dam protecting the IRS scandal began to crack today when Lois Lerner, the IRS official who announced, and apologized for, the improper singling out of conservative-leaning organizations by IRS employees under her command, announced through her criminal defense lawyer that she will not testify as scheduled tomorrow before the House Oversight Committee. Rather, she will assert her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. This marks an enormous milestone in the IRS investigation. It can now be taken as more or less established that crimes were committed by Obama administration employees. Lerner’s lawyer tried to minimize the significance
|
|
‘Rosen’s in the Wind!’
|
|
National Review Online, by Jonah Goldberg
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 9:29:36 PM
Post Reply
|
|
John Podhoretz has a good column today on the Obama administration’s travails. I did not know this bit until I read the column: Even more startling, the search warrant makes clear that the FBI already had everything it needed on the leaker, as the request for a search warrant features quotes from an interview that were tantamount to a confession. It asked that the warrant be sealed — in other words, that Rosen not be told — because knowledge might “cause subjects to flee”! Imagine it: Rosen, an on-air reporter
|
All of Obama´s Scandals Are
Ultimately About Information Control
|
|
National Review Online, by Jim Geraghty
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 9:26:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
There’s really no reason for the press to suggest that the recent slew of scandals involving the Obama administration — Benghazi, the AP phone-record seizure, the snooping in James Rosen’s e-mail, the IRS’s targeting of conservative groups, and so on — are a confusing jumble. There is a very clear thread running through all of the administration’s actions: The U.S. deputy chief of mission in Libya, Gregory Hicks, says that he was told not to speak to a member of Congress about Benghazi without a State Department lawyer present, that he received a phone call from Hillary Clinton’s
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
White House Chief of Staff knew about
damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark
|
|
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.
|
| |
|
Leaks turn to deluge
for reeling White House
|
|
New York Post, by John Podhoretz
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 4:49:13 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The wheels came off the Obama administration yesterday. We learned of a startling assault on freedom of the press by the Department of Justice, following the revelation last week of the unprecedented information-gathering foray by that department against The Associated Press. Then, a few minutes later, the Justice Department’s inspector general released a report declaring that the US attorney in Arizona used the leak of a confidential memo to try to discredit a whistleblower in the notorious “gun-walking” scandal known as Fast and Furious (which got two federal agents killed). The leak was called “egregious.”
|
Top IRS official will
invoke Fifth Amendment
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Richard Simon and Joseph Tanfani
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 3:53:35 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups. Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd. Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.
|
Anthony Weiner announces NYC mayor run
|
|
Politico, by Kevin Robillard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/22/2013 6:06:40 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Former Rep. Anthony Weiner, whose career in public life came to an abrupt end when he sent lewd pictures to a college student on Twitter, jumped back into politics on Wednesday by announcing a bid for mayor of New York City. “Look, I’ve made some big mistakes and I know I’ve let a lot of people down,” the Democrat said in a 2-minute video announcing his bid. “But I’ve also learned some tough lessons. I’m running for mayor because I’ve been fighting for the middle class and those struggling to make it for my entire life.
|
A Crack in the IRS Dam
|
|
Power Line, by John Hinderaker
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:50:44 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The dam protecting the IRS scandal began to crack today when Lois Lerner, the IRS official who announced, and apologized for, the improper singling out of conservative-leaning organizations by IRS employees under her command, announced through her criminal defense lawyer that she will not testify as scheduled tomorrow before the House Oversight Committee. Rather, she will assert her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. This marks an enormous milestone in the IRS investigation. It can now be taken as more or less established that crimes were committed by Obama administration employees. Lerner’s lawyer tried to minimize the significance
|
Howard Dean: ‘Benghazi
is a Laughable Joke’
|
|
National Review Online, by Andrew Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 11:59:15 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Former Democratic National committee chairman Howard Dean considers the controversy over Benghazi a “joke” and “silly.” “Benghazi is a laughable joke,” Dean proclaimed twice in a discussion with Republican National Committee communications chairman Sean Spicer last week. “With all due respect, governor, when four Americans die serving this country, that’s not a joke, sir,” Spicer responded. “Oh, stop it,” said Dean. The former Democratic presidential candidate also said that there were “no serious questions being asked about Benghazi” and brushed it off as an effort by Republicans to score political points.
|
| |
|
Man questioned in Boston Marathon
bombing shot, killed by FBI
|
|
WCBV-TV [Boston], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 5/22/2013 7:21:44 AM
Post Reply
|
|
One of two men allegedly being questioned in connection with the Boston Marathon bombings was shot and killed by an FBI agent in Florida on Tuesday, (Snip)A friend of Ibragim Todashev said he and Todashev were being investigated as part of the Boston bombings. He said Todashev, 27, knew bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev because both were MMA fighters. The man claims he and Todashev were interviewed by the FBI for nearly three hours on Tuesday. The friend said he left the interview, and when he came back to the apartment he found that there had been a shooting.
|
| | |
|
|
