|
|
| |
Topic: Injunction over negative Yelp review overturned by Virginia Supreme Court |
Injunction over negative Yelp review overturned by Virginia Supreme Court
Washington Post, by Justin Jouvenal,
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Drive, 1/2/2013 8:57:25 PM
|
| The Virginia Supreme Court has overturned a preliminary injunction against a Fairfax woman who is facing a $750,000 defamation lawsuit for her negative reviews on Yelp and Angie’s List. A Fairfax County Circuit Court had previously ordered Jane Perez to remove some claims she made in her negatice reviews of a D.C. contractor who performed work on her home and barred her from repeating those accusations in future posts. But on Friday, the Virginia Supreme Court found the preliminary injunction was not limited to a prescribed period, was not justified
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
saguni, 1/2/2013 9:23:51 PM (No. 9095639)
I think it was Ben Franklin that said, "If you steal my purse, you take little of value, but if you take my good name, I can never get it back."
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
bob913, 1/2/2013 11:03:21 PM (No. 9095742)
I have had people bad mouth me behind my back. They hide like cowards. At least this person was able to connect a name and a bank account to the person that bad mouth him.
I would have expected she could have provided photos of the damage or non performance of the work at the very least. The article does not say if she did but did say the case had been dismissed prior to going to court. That to me shows no evidence.
You want evidence then watch Holmes on Homes who repairs what other contractors wreck.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
4Justice, 1/3/2013 12:25:41 AM (No. 9095816)
I have mixed feelings...however, if I see only one bad review and a lot of good ones, I tend to discount the one bad. I know people can be vindictive and crazy. But then again I have also been erroneously treated badly by some businesses too. We had a veterinarian office lie about us and then force us to leave in the middle of treatment. It was all a misunderstanding over an agreement one of the doctors made but the doctor wasn´t there and the office people claimed we called them liars and threatened them (never happened). The office people were rude from the beginning and we just tried to get them to call the doctor. Nobody threatened anyone. So, what can a person do? Write a review. I tried calling the office manager but she wouldn´t even listen to me. Her mind was closed. So, yes..sometimes businesses do mess with their customers. And when they do, people should be able to have a place to relay their experiences so others don´t have to endure it.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Charactercounts, 1/3/2013 1:15:04 AM (No. 9095838)
Having endured the incompetence and downright dishonesty (and theft) of contractors, my sympathies tend to lie with the customer, who posted a bad review.
If the contractor was unfairly reviewed, there should be a number of good reviews to counter the bad one.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Keekng, 1/3/2013 5:31:45 AM (No. 9095931)
Does "Angies List" attract sponsors by disallowing negative comments?
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Drive"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Drive"
|
Ex-Diplomats Report New Benghazi Whistleblowers with Info Devastating to Clinton and Obama
|
|
PJ Media, by Roger L. Simon
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: drive- 5/21/2013 8:22:05 AM
Post Reply
|
|
More whistleblowers will emerge shortly in the escalating Benghazi scandal, according to two former U.S. diplomats who spoke with PJ Media Monday afternoon. These whistleblowers, colleagues of the former diplomats, are currently securing legal counsel because they work in areas not fully protected by the Whistleblower law. According to the diplomats, what these whistleblowers will say will be at least as explosive as what we have already learned about the scandal, including details about what really transpired in Benghazi that are potentially devastating to both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.
|
| |
|
Cheer up, Righties — We’re all victims now!
|
|
Daily Caller, by Will Rahn
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: drive- 5/21/2013 8:14:23 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Conservatives have always belonged to our nation’s least sympathetic group: the unvictimized. The Republican Party is overwhelmingly white, Christian, straight and increasingly Southern. It is, at least in the minds of its critics, the party of the privileged oppressor. It’s here that the unfolding IRS scandal involving the targeting and abuse of conservative groups has one little bit of a silver lining. For the first time in decades, it can now be proven that conservatives are the victims of government-mandated discrimination at the hands of America’s least popular government agency.
|
|
Stop the Leaks
|
|
New York Times, by William P. Barr *
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: drive- 5/21/2013 8:00:45 AM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON — FOLLOWING the disclosure that the Justice Department obtained the telephone records of Associated Press journalists, The A.P. and other news organizations have sharply criticized the action as investigative overreaching and unwarranted interference with the ability of journalists to report on government operations. As former Justice Department officials who served in the three administrations preceding President Obama’s, we are worried that the criticism of the decision to subpoena telephone toll records of A.P.
|
Former IRS commissioner heads to Hill amid scandal
|
|
Associated Press, by Stephen Ohlmacher and Alan Fram
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: drive- 5/21/2013 7:45:02 AM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON - Lawmakers are getting their first chance to question the former head of the Internal Revenue Service, the man who ran the agency when agents were improperly targeting tea party groups. Some of the questions on Tuesday will be direct: What did you know, and when did you know it? They also want to know why former IRS Commissioner Douglas Shulman didn´t tell Congress that agents had been singling out conservative political groups for additional scrutiny when they applied for tax-exempt status - even after he was briefed.
|
This Time, It’s Personal: DOJ vs. Rosen Another Ugly Chapter Of Obama vs. Fox
|
|
Mediaite, by Joe Concha
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: drive- 5/21/2013 7:31:37 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The Department of Justice seizing two months of phone records from approximately 100 reporters at the Associated Press has been roundly branded as “chilling” by those who live inside the media bubble. But to average folks not paying close attention due to long hours at the office, taking care of family matters, or just apathy about anything political these days, the story didn’t have the impact some thought it might have. Perhaps it’s scandal fatigue (so many scandals, so little time), or maybe it’s because the AP is a humdrum entity: no cable television
|
|
Obama´s ´idiot´ defense
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Jonah Goldberg
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: drive- 5/21/2013 7:03:17 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Although there´s still a great deal to be learned about the scandals and controversies swirling around the White House like so many ominous dorsal fins in the surf, the nature of President Obama´s bind is becoming clear. The best defenses of his administration require undermining the rationale for his presidency. "We´re portrayed by Republicans as either being lying or idiots. It´s actually closer to us being idiots." So far, this is the administration´s best defense. It was offered to CBS´ Sharyl Attkisson by an anonymous aide involved in the White House´s disastrous response to the attacks in Benghazi, Libya.
|
| |
|
Carney: Senior White House staff knew of IRS probe
|
|
Associated Press, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 5/20/2013 4:04:05 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON — The White House says White House Counsel Kathryn Ruemmler was first informed about an audit of the IRS´ inappropriate targeting of conservative groups on April 24 and that she notified senior staff, including Denis McDonough, the chief of staff to President Barack Obama. White House press secretary Jay Carney says Ruemmler "appropriately" decided not to tell Obama at the time because the audit was ongoing. The audit by a Treasury Department inspector general found that IRS employees singled out groups with names like "tea party" and "patriots" for special scrutiny that delayed their applications for tax exempt status.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Analyze this
|
|
Power Line, by Scott Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript
|
Obama: "As An African American You Have To Work Twice As Hard As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"
|
|
Real Clear Politics, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM
Post Reply
|
|
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life
|
White House Chief of Staff knew about damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark
|
|
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.
|
BREAKING: WashPost Reports Obama DOJ Also Spied on James Rosen of Fox News
|
|
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:
|
| |
|
Candy Crowley: Is it Possible This Isn´t Political and IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass the Tea Party?
|
|
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week
|
White House Aide calls Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´
|
|
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.
|
If Your Doctor Asks You About Guns, Do You Have to Answer?
|
|
Fox News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement
|
| | |
|
|