|
|
| |
Topic: Krauthammer: Senate fiscal cliff legislation ´a complete surrender on everything´ |
Krauthammer: Senate fiscal cliff legislation ´a complete surrender on everything´
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:sparky86, 1/1/2013 7:58:51 PM
|
| On Tuesday’s broadcast of Fox News Channel’s “Special Report,” Washington Post columnist Charles Krauthammer speculated that House Majority Leader Eric Cantor might try to replace John Boehner as speaker of the House. “It’s possible this is the prelude to a challenge Thursday to Boehner’s leadership by Eric Cantor,” Krauthammer said. “I think that would be quite naked to do it at this late hour, as a result of this split over the vote. Look, there are a lot of conservatives in the Republican caucus in the House who hate the bill
|
Comments: Strong words from the good doctor. A lot of people probably will disagree, but we´ll have to wait and see if it does any good.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Seaduck79, 1/1/2013 8:04:17 PM (No. 9093711)
The Republican Party needs to figure out what it actually represents that is a positive alternative to the Democrats, then hold to whatever that is.
Right now, there is no cohesive message because there is no strong leader to keep them in line behind a direction they all want to go. Good leaders get their people to focus on what´s important and agree to disagree on what isn´t.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
tearza, 1/1/2013 8:07:36 PM (No. 9093716)
I will never vote for a republican again.... They give in everytime and I´m tired of wasting my vote for these bozos....They say one thing and do another....Just not going to vote anymore.....
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Di Guy, 1/1/2013 8:08:55 PM (No. 9093717)
New political party...anyone? I´m for it...and completely fed up.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Bpl40, 1/1/2013 8:09:20 PM (No. 9093718)
A very basic and fundamental question. Are you for limited government or are you not? It is too late in the hour to say "Yes but"....
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
MDConservative, 1/1/2013 8:17:12 PM (No. 9093727)
Cantor? That grinning fool standing next to Boehner in all the liveshots? Ahhh, no. He´s just as compromised.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
minuteman, 1/1/2013 8:19:29 PM (No. 9093731)
But Boehner is pimping for this nightmare.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
3rdjerseyman, 1/1/2013 8:21:12 PM (No. 9093733)
Enough with the 3rd party nonsense. You are surrendering the country to socialism.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
RLowe, 1/1/2013 8:31:12 PM (No. 9093744)
OK,so let´s surrender to a socialist GOP?
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
GreatPlains, 1/1/2013 8:31:54 PM (No. 9093746)
FTA- " Krauthammer said that if the House rejects the Senate fiscal cliff bill, Republicans should start over with a clean slate in the new Congress."
“They will probably be enough with all the Democrats to pass this,” Krauthammer said.
‘We’re going to introduce the cuts Thursday — a clean bill. None of the other stuff in it, like the wind power credit and all of this other stimulus junk.’”
The House passed a clean bill like this last June ( only 19 Democrats voted for it ) and it died in the Senate. Reid would not allow it to come to a vote. I don´t understand how Dr K thinks Democrats would go along with this now when they haven´t before.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
arcady, 1/1/2013 8:36:20 PM (No. 9093751)
They keep using this word Republican. I don´t think it means, what they think it means.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
SouthSanAntonio, 1/1/2013 9:14:40 PM (No. 9093812)
The Republican Party, along with our Republic, died on 11-6-2012.
What little is left of the Republicans are just surrendering. A little sputter here, a little sputter there, and then surrender.
The Republican Party of today is the France of political parties here in the USSA (United Soviet States of Amerika).
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Bobn.t, 1/2/2013 12:25:39 AM (No. 9094026)
Krauthammer: Senate fiscal cliff legislation ´a complete surrender on everything´ - what did you expect?
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
King of all trolls, 1/2/2013 12:33:16 AM (No. 9094033)
If you´re going third party don´t forget to take West, Palin, Mourdock and the radio shock jocks with you. Please!.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
steveW, 1/2/2013 2:00:47 AM (No. 9094079)
Sarah Palin´s insight that reform, of the magnitude that is now needed, must be swift and relentless is sounding more prescient every day. The GOP is proving incapable of tying its own shoes. I´ve been dead set against third party talk till now, but what on earth is the alternative? Decades more of complete surrender?
The GOP lost the debate long ago when it embraced leftwing Democrat schemes like Social Security and Medicare. Instead of vowing to dismantle these socialist-creep projects (and so many others) that nowhere can be justified in the Constitution, the GOP vows to engrave Democrat-concocted Big Government entitlements in stone so that dependency and collective guilt can never be erased from the American experience. Thus, ceding the "helping people" argument to the Left from the start, it has no principled leg to stand on when it counts. It has shot itself in both feet. Things that can´t go on, won´t. The GOP can´t go on.
I´d have your back, Sarah. Many others now too, I strongly suspect. "Common Sense Party"? "Conservative Party"? or just "Tea Party"?
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
AnnaS, 1/2/2013 7:11:05 AM (No. 9094203)
I did not think they would put up no fight. I did not think they would surrender like that. Boehner absolutely must go and yet he seems to have some stranglehold . He is great at consolidating his own power, just worthless at being a Strong leader! If there is any one person left with an ounce of fight, he/ she must get rid of Boehner!
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
andyboy, 1/2/2013 7:15:05 AM (No. 9094210)
We keep criticizing the Republicans for refusing to fight, but with every setback the posters on this site are quick to whine:
"The United States is dead"
"Let´s form a third party"
"I´ll never vote Republican again"
"etc."
How about if, instead, WE FIGHT to reclaim the Republican Party? There seem to be enough of us to get it done.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
fransand, 1/2/2013 7:35:49 AM (No. 9094242)
Fight to reclaim the Republican Party--that´s the only way. The GOP´s organizational skill´s are a definite problem as this last election proved. Keep fighting and working and quit whining!
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
LZK, 1/2/2013 7:37:37 AM (No. 9094248)
I"m so tired to Washington DC -- I need a good rest from their "razzle dazzle games".....
LZK
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
AnnaS, 1/2/2013 7:44:49 AM (No. 9094258)
#16 exactly how do you suggest we affect this take over of the Republican Party?
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
Bad Dog, 1/2/2013 7:51:15 AM (No. 9094272)
We are becoming quite fractured here. I am completely in agreement with #14 - exactly what I would have said had I arrived here a little sooner, and said quite likely better than I would have said it.
#16 and #17: Your posts cause me to think what you might propose.... It´s one thing to say, Reform the GOP!, but quite another to do it when they ignore those of us who put them in their congressional jobs. I´d be thrilled to stay with the GOP and fight to make the necessary changes from within, but how do we get them to listen to US again, when they´ve all become so entrenched in the DC ways? Their elections to their positions start with us, but apparently their principles end within two years of exposure to and pressure by their own party leaders.
Cantor? Hmmmm...... I have to admit I was surprised late yesterday to see that he had suddenly found what he carries in his trousers..... but then, having become jaded over the years of observing the DC chess games, I immediately suspected he was just giving public balance to Boehner´s immovable ´´let´s make a deal - I´ll give first!!´´ philosophy.
I don´t know what the answers are - but I´d bet many of us here could sustain a viable ´´Common Sense Party´´ - and do a helluva better job at GOVERNING (as opposed to wheeling and dealing the country away to certain devastation).
Gov. Palin - I too would have your back.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
red oak, 1/2/2013 8:02:48 AM (No. 9094288)
The problem is we don´t have the Senate. Hang in there everyone. And this isn´t a retreat, rather a re-trenching, which is tactical.
Obama is the one disappointed. He wanted a cliff dive and didn´t get it.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
Rinktum, 1/2/2013 8:33:09 AM (No. 9094332)
I didn´t leave the Republican Party, the Republican Party left me. If I do nothing else, I will change my party affiliation and I hope many of you will do the same if for no other reason than to make a statement.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
delgarno8, 1/2/2013 9:01:43 AM (No. 9094393)
Palin/Gingrich ticket would not have caved
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
Catherine, 1/2/2013 9:04:55 AM (No. 9094402)
Again this morning, I have to agree with poster # 2. I will never again vote for a Republican if I don´t like him. This ´hold your nose´ business and vote is over with for me. Republicans have coasted on this behavior for years. They may continue to do so but not with my help they won´t.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
Farmwife1, 1/2/2013 9:30:44 AM (No. 9094472)
As Rush has pointed out numerous times: the problem is always the "other guy," but MY congressperson/senator is just fine!
It´s sort of a Catch-22, we want a representative who will bring home the bacon to me, but not to thee. But with the spending problem we have, eventually the pig will be extinct.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
PoliticalJunky, 1/2/2013 9:33:29 AM (No. 9094478)
16 and 17 are correct. We have to keep trying. One thing I tried to teach my children was that if you give up you are already defeated.
How stupid is it to abandon whatever troops you still have? We need more people on our side, not fewer, and some of you are playing the Democrats´ game by removing yourselves from the battle.
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
whyyeseyec, 1/2/2013 10:33:57 AM (No. 9094586)
Boehner will remain Speaker. There is nobody to challenge him. Paul Ryan voted for this legislation and has remained silent on everything since the election loss, so don`t think for one second he would be a Speaker candidate. A new Congress takes effect on Jan. 3rd. Boehner`s first order of business is to take the newbies aside and get them in line with how things work in DC. You want to get ahead do as I say. You stray, there is no GOP money for reelection and no committee assignments. Boehner is tough when it comes to his own troops but cowers when dealing with the dems.
As for the debt ceiling? That too will go right down to the wire and the GOP will cave, raise it and off we go with more debt and more `revenue` demanded by Obama. By 2016 we`ll be lucky to only have 25 trillion in debt.
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
AnnaS, 1/2/2013 10:51:49 AM (No. 9094628)
I am laughing as I come back to this thread and read that Americans are "weary and wary." Why? They voted for what we are getting now! Enjoy!
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
Quiet Observer, 1/2/2013 10:56:39 AM (No. 9094638)
Our first order of business should be to inform every House Republican who voted to surrender (i.e.: voted for this bloated pork-filled tax hike with only miniscule spending cuts - so they wouldn’t be a scapegoat for going over the fiscal cliff) that they have only 2 choices: either announce that they will not run in 2014 or face a no-holds-barred primary challenge by a dedicated TEA (Taxed Enough Already) Party candidate, who will promise to cut spending and will remind voters at every opportunity of your spineless vote on this shameful bill to burden our children with endless debt.
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
RancherJack, 1/2/2013 11:11:39 AM (No. 9094679)
I´ve heard this before.
Only rarely has a change in (R) leadership produced any results.
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
stryker714, 1/2/2013 11:13:36 AM (No. 9094685)
The cave men strike again, just as many thought they would. This aspect of firing off a couple of shots, politically, then throwing the rifle down on the battlefield and walking away is maddening. Why do the pubs keep losing to the majik mulatto? Is BO really that much smarter than them? He cheated his whole way through life so there really isn´t any substance, it´s all smoke and mirrors. The pubs are not playing what few cards they have, wisely anyway. Oh we´ll stick with the republican party ok but only if we get all new people. The debt ceiling is not going to go our way either.
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
pete moss, 1/2/2013 11:30:38 AM (No. 9094726)
Next up, the stupid Republicans will cave in to Diane Feinstein´s destroy the Second Amendment legislation that she will introduce tomorrow. If that happens, I will never vote for those surrender monkeys again!
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
Dixie, 1/2/2013 11:37:58 AM (No. 9094738)
The Speaker of the House does not have to be an elected Representative.
I will support a boomlet for Allen West as Speaker. He will NOT be an elected Representative, thus he will not worry about re-election. I presume he will be (or can be) paid for his services as Speaker. And we can count on him to be... Conservative, and a Fighter.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "sparky86"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "sparky86"
|
Krauthammer: Obama IRS scandal statement ´a holding operation,´ ´the absolute minimum´
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: sparky86- 5/15/2013 8:50:09 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Immediately following President Barack Obama’s remarks on Wednesday about the current scandal embroiling the Internal Revenue Service, Washington Post columnist Charles Krauthammer reacted by downplaying the gesture. “That was a holding operation,” Krauthammer said. “That was the absolute minimum he could have done. He relieves one person. He obviously had to. He had to relieve at least one person. And he chose, of course , the acting commissioner. But, I would have expected more. The other actions he announced are up to now meaningless. Obama and this administration have said a hundred times they’re going to
|
George Will on IRS Tea Party attacks: ´How stupid do they think we are?´
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: sparky86- 5/13/2013 9:48:19 AM
Post Reply
|
|
George Will joined the chorus talking about the prospect of impeachment for President Barack Obama after last week’s admission from the Internal Revenue Service that it had targeted groups with the phrases “tea party” or “patriot” in their tax-exempt applications for extra audits . On Sunday’s broadcast of ABC’s “This Week with George Stephanopoulos,” Will proposed a scenario wherein the Bush administration had targeted groups with the word “progressive” in their names and concluded the situation would be much different in terms of expressions of outrage. “Mr. Hicks, when he was in Libya, said his jaw dropped
|
Brit Hume: ‘No way’ for Hillary Clinton to escape responsibility for Benghazi
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: sparky86- 5/7/2013 8:06:25 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Senior Fox News political analyst Brit Hume laid out why this week’s testimony on last September’s terrorist attack on the U.S. consulate in Libya could be problematic for former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Hume, speaking on Tuesday’s broadcast of “America Live,” said there is no feasible way for her to escape any responsibility since she had to be involved in the crafting of the talking points that came out after the attack that resulted in the deaths of four Americans, including then-U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens. "There’s really no way for her to escape responsibility for this if this
|
NY Times makes same arguments for immigration reform they did ahead of 1986 amnesty
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: sparky86- 4/28/2013 11:16:50 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Back in the 1980s, the country faced a familiar dilemma to the one it faces today — the border was insecure and too many illegal immigrants had moved into the United States. At the time, the proposed solution was a bill crafted by then Wyoming Republican Sen. Alan Simpson and Kentucky Democratic Rep. Romano Mazzoli. Signed into law by President Ronald Reagan in 1986, it instantly granted 3 million illegal immigrants legal status. Yet a little over 30 years later the problem has returned, with more than 11 million illegal immigrants now in the United States.
|
Bill O´Reilly attacks MSNBC´s Alex Wagner: ´Beyond stupid´
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: sparky86- 4/26/2013 7:24:16 AM
Post Reply
|
|
“The O’Reilly Factor” host Bill O’Reilly on Thursday criticized those seeking to downplay the role of Islamic extremism in the Boston Marathon bombings. “There is no question that many on the left are very disappointed the two suspects in the terror bombing are Muslim,” O’Reilly said. “And it is sad to say that many in the Muslim world will never believe the Tsarnaev brothers committed the atrocity.” O’Reilly referred specifically to comments by Zubeidat Tsarnev, the mother of suspected Boston Marathon bombers Dzohkhar and Tamerlan Tsarnev. “Now, there is nothing on Earth that can make that woman accept reality
|
Pat Buchanan calls ´Gang of 8´ proposal acts of ´madness,´ ´suicidal folly´ for GOP
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: sparky86- 4/22/2013 4:56:20 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Conservative columnist Pat Buchanan says the “Gang of Eight” immigration reform bill will, if passed, threaten national security and destroy the Republican Party’s ability to compete on a national level. Buchanan, author of “Suicide of a Superpower: Will America Survive to 2025?” told radio host Laura Ingraham on Monday that passing a “blanket pardon” of illegal immigrants would be “an act of madness,” particularly in the wake of last week’s terrorist attacks in Boston. “It’s been one week since something like 178 to 180 Americans — three of them murdered — but 178 injured, maimed and wounded by two
|
Joe Scarborough: Republicans that filibuster gun control ´put rapists´ rights over parents´ rights´
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: sparky86- 4/8/2013 11:05:50 AM
Post Reply
|
|
On Monday’s broadcast of MSNBC “Morning Joe,” host Joe Scarborough voiced his agreement with Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain, who on Sunday’s “Face the Nation” on CBS questioned those Republicans who are threatening a filibuster on pending gun control legislation. Scarborough said such a filibuster would be an example of the GOP putting “rapists’ rights ahead over parents’ rights.” “[I] tell you what, Richard Haass, I saw John McCain there,” Scarborough said. “And I’m hopeful. Because, you know, there are a lot of guys out there in the Senate and they are going out because it’s a free shot.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Analyze this
|
|
Power Line, by Scott Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript
|
Evidence emerges that Obama administration official knew of IRS targeting during 2012 campaign
|
|
CBS News, by Margaret Brennan
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 5/18/2013 9:01:39 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON - There were new questions Saturday night concerning if anyone in the White House was aware of the IRS´ targeting of conservative groups. Inspector General Russell George said he informed a deputy at the Treasury Department in June of 2012 about the probe into the IRS. The Treasury Department confirmed the timeline but said they did not know the details of the investigation until last week.(Snip)Marcus Owens ran the tax-exempt division at the IRS for 10 years. He said it isn´t difficult to figure out who´s doing what at the agency.
|
Obama: "As An African American You Have To Work Twice As Hard As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"
|
|
Real Clear Politics, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM
Post Reply
|
|
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life
|
Camelot Is Burning
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Christopher Burton
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: mitzi- 5/18/2013 8:16:11 PM
Post Reply
|
|
It began in earnest last Friday. A flash mob of latte drinking, tofu eating media that has done its best to quell, rather than fan the flames of truth, turned on one of their own. Jay Carney lay bludgeoned at the base of the podium, a victim of friendly fire. Ironically, the attack was reminiscent of the one in Benghazi he has repeatedly denied the Administration he represents bears any responsibility for. “Changed twelve times?!” came the cries. And with good reason. We were misled; no, lied to.
|
Watergate 2.0 -- why the IRS scandal is far worse
|
|
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,
|
Lew asks Congress for debt increase, says it’s ´not open to debate´
|
|
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.
|
McCaskill Calls For Firing Of All Involved In IRS Targeting Scandal
|
|
KMOX [St, Louis], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/18/2013 2:46:31 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Washington – Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-MO, issued a video statement Friday in response to reports that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative nonprofit groups. (Snip) “There’s a reason Lady Justice wears a blindfold in America. That is because in America, we don’t apply the law based on who you are, who you know, or what you believe. We apply the law equally.” “We should not only fire the head of the IRS, which has occurred, but we’ve got to go down the line and find every single person who had anything to do with this and make sure
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|