|
|
Not an Awful Deal
American Spectator, by Quin Hillyer
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Dreadnought, 1/1/2013 11:18:20 AM
|
| After about an hour of studying last night’s budget deal, I find it right on the borderline between (A) awful-tasting medicine we still need to take for our health and (B) a cure that is worse than the disease. But careful, careful attention pushes the calculation every-so-slightly toward the former. This isn’t even a 51-49 proposition, but only a 50.1-49.9 proposition. Still, here’s why the option of a “yes” vote for House Republicans — notwithstanding my warnings yesterday that “no deal” is better than a bad deal — is not an unacceptable decision. First, obviously
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Cleanhousein2012, 1/1/2013 11:44:04 AM (No. 9093125)
Go over the cliff. Let people understand the cost of big union government.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Rusino, 1/1/2013 11:50:06 AM (No. 9093131)
Mr. Hillyer shines a different light on the ´agreement´. Although he assumes that there are Elected Republicans that are smart enough, strong enough and brave enough to figure it out!
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Johnny Angle, 1/1/2013 12:12:18 PM (No. 9093158)
Keep your eye on the prize - the debt ceiling power of the House.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
pgvoisin, 1/1/2013 12:16:57 PM (No. 9093169)
Slowly but surely, this "Fiscal Cliff" narrative will actually become a turning point in America Politics with a series of questions that The White House, The Senate, The MSM, and the American people will need to answer. If the Republicans and the Libertarians are smart, all they will need to do is ask these questions and let the Progressives answer them.
Will more tax revenue solve our spending problems? (No. $1 of debt reduction for every $42 of tax revenue won’t stop debt limit increases)
If we raise taxes even more later this year, will that balance our budget? (No)
If we raise our debt limit, will we balance our budget? (No)
Is cutting the GROWTH of spending actually cutting the number of dollars we spend? (No)
But if we DO cut the GROWTH of spending, will that stop us from having to keep increasing our debt limit? (No)
So the only way to balance the budget is to actually CUT spending? (Yes)
Do we have recommendations to cut our waste, fraud, and abuse in government spending? (Yes)
Have we ever proposed doing that before we raise taxes or cut vital safety net programs? (No)
Will the political party that proposes that first be demonized or praised by the other party and the press for doing so? (Who knows?)
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
noproblems, 1/1/2013 12:20:04 PM (No. 9093181)
just another establishment inside the bubble moron.
time to change you voter registration to the American Renaissance Party. No establishment Repugs and no Dimms allowed.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
horacer, 1/1/2013 12:25:38 PM (No. 9093192)
The agreement stinks, but it could have been worse. We put ourselves in this position. We lost and Obama has all the leverage.
My only problem with Boehner has been his tactics. Instead of negotiating with Obama he should have made a clear, concise pitch to the voters. We need a big 2014 to take the Senate, this was an opportunity to fire the opening salvo.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Brianod1, 1/1/2013 12:32:35 PM (No. 9093203)
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Brianod1, 1/1/2013 12:34:48 PM (No. 9093207)
L dotters, please read the article before posting. And sorry for second blank post in two days..still mastering the ipad.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
reilly, 1/1/2013 12:36:35 PM (No. 9093217)
So what of the Breitbart numbers? They´ve got all day. Make some spending and AMT and deduction amendments and send it back. And ignore the patsy up the street.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
yuban, 1/1/2013 12:43:57 PM (No. 9093236)
The House can stop this nonsense.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
cobieone, 1/1/2013 12:49:32 PM (No. 9093248)
Couldn´t agree more Mr Hillyer... "It might just be time to lick our wounds, take our medicine, hobble away, and prepare a counterassault from high ground of our own choosing. In those two months, conservatives should push Paul Ryan back to the fore, and should listen to the wisdom of Jeff Sessions in the Senate about using open hearings to highlight the conservative case for lower spending, and should also push people to the fore such as Wisconsin’s Ron Johnson, and Marco Rubio, and Ted Cruz."
Where has Paul Ryan been????
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
jimboendaatl, 1/1/2013 1:03:53 PM (No. 9093278)
Good article, thanks for posting, it´s good to hear both sides after reading the Breitbart version this morning.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Bpl40, 1/1/2013 1:28:35 PM (No. 9093320)
Don´t like the result but what else can you realistically expect? We couldn´t get enough workers to the polls on November 6 and continue to be outnumbered by the parasites. Bottom line - go back to basics and awaken as many of the Nov 6 absentees as you can.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
PageTurner, 1/1/2013 2:10:18 PM (No. 9093341)
I agree with Hillyer. The alternative is really bad and I´d rather not do it. That said, the argument that those who vote for big government should pay for big government makes sense. The thing is, I didn´t vote for big government.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
noproblems, 1/1/2013 3:05:24 PM (No. 9093398)
OMG, it is sad to see even onside the beltway folksd like Hillyer dont understand that the Senate will not cut spending. They put off the "cuts". Why even include the provision at all if there intent was to cut spending?
They act like cutting 10% from a $600 billion budget will make us defenseless.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Javelin, 1/1/2013 3:49:33 PM (No. 9093446)
Nonsense. Obama won this battle in the public perception. The details don´t matter. We will not be able to "fight from high ground." We are in full retreat. The House should amend the bill to Bowles-Simpson and watch the fascist in the White House choke. They won´t. It´s a tuxedo world and the GOP is a pair of brown shoes.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
eoddad, 1/1/2013 4:34:48 PM (No. 9093493)
Corporal Hitler refused to let his generals on the Eastern front make strategic withdrawals when it could have made a vast improvement in their situation. His refusal resulted in numerous German Armies being completely destroyed. The Germans were experts in these type actions. I hope Quin is right and McConnel and Boehner are doing a maneuver here, two months with Obamacare kicking in, 5% drop this week in O´s popularity since Christmas and the embarrassing act he did in his speech yesterday all give hope. Its hard to carryout a maneuver when our own side blames our guys for the poor situation. It´s about strategy and slowing down the enemy as well as leading "them" into a trap for a change. I know one thing, Obama does not sound or act like he´s winning.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Trigger2, 1/2/2013 5:12:57 AM (No. 9094145)
Not awful? Then how come that $620B tax increase is already mostly spent? Each year congress automatically increases spending by 6-8% by some stupid congressional rule. That 15B cut is already gone because the increase in spending wipes it out.
This deal was a deal with the devil. McConnell needs to be sent packing. And now that the House has passed it, so do they. Next cave will be the debt limit.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
|
Petraeus’s role in drafting Benghazi talking points raises questions
|
|
Washington Post, by Scott Wilson and Karen DeYoung
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 11:03:01 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The controversy over the Obama administration’s response to the Benghazi attack last year began at a meeting over coffee on Capitol Hill three days after the assault. It was at this informal session with the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence that the ranking Democrat asked David H. Petraeus, who was CIA director at the time, to ensure that committee members did not inadvertently disclose classified information when talking to the news media about the attack. “We had some new members on the committee, and we knew the press would be very aggressive on this, so we didn’t want
|
With more clarity, White House adds to confusion on IRS
|
|
Washington Post, by Dan Balz
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:59:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
It is never good for an administration when a front-page newspaper article about an ongoing controversy begins as follows: “The White House offered a new account Monday of how and when it learned .?.?. ” That’s what readers of The Post awoke to on Tuesday. In trying to contain the controversy and protect President Obama, White House officials have only added to questions about what happened. Until this week, the story of how White House officials learned that the Internal Revenue Service was targeting conservative groups was fairly straightforward. White House counsel Kathryn Ruemmler was notified in late April
|
In AP, Rosen investigations, government makes criminals of reporters
|
|
Washington Post, by Dana Milbank
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:56:21 PM
Post Reply
|
|
There are various reasons you might not care about the Obama administration’s spying on journalist James Rosen and labeling him a “co-conspirator and/or aider and abettor” in an espionage case. Liberals may not be particularly bothered because the targeted journalist works for Fox News. Conservatives may not be concerned because of their antipathy toward the news media generally. And the general public certainly doesn’t have much patience for journalists’ whining. But here’s why you should care — and why this case, along with the administration’s broad snooping into Associated Press phone records, is more serious than the other supposed
|
| |
|
|
White House meltdown: A truth deficit
|
|
Washington Post, by Jennifer Rubin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:53:11 PM
Post Reply
|
|
There seems to be bipartisan consensus that whatever the White House is doing to fend off scandal is making things worse. Howard Fineman sounds a lot like Right Turn these days: “White House aides are tempting fate with their reluctant, piecemeal and contradictory disclosures of what they knew and when they knew it, especially about a report on the Internal Revenue Service’s 18-month effort to target tea party and other conservative groups for special scrutiny.” The constantly shifting stories from Jay Carney and the IRS dissembling and pleas of ignorance only heighten concern that there has been serious wrongdoing.
|
|
A Crack in the IRS Dam
|
|
Power Line, by John Hinderaker
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:50:44 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The dam protecting the IRS scandal began to crack today when Lois Lerner, the IRS official who announced, and apologized for, the improper singling out of conservative-leaning organizations by IRS employees under her command, announced through her criminal defense lawyer that she will not testify as scheduled tomorrow before the House Oversight Committee. Rather, she will assert her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. This marks an enormous milestone in the IRS investigation. It can now be taken as more or less established that crimes were committed by Obama administration employees. Lerner’s lawyer tried to minimize the significance
|
|
‘Rosen’s in the Wind!’
|
|
National Review Online, by Jonah Goldberg
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 9:29:36 PM
Post Reply
|
|
John Podhoretz has a good column today on the Obama administration’s travails. I did not know this bit until I read the column: Even more startling, the search warrant makes clear that the FBI already had everything it needed on the leaker, as the request for a search warrant features quotes from an interview that were tantamount to a confession. It asked that the warrant be sealed — in other words, that Rosen not be told — because knowledge might “cause subjects to flee”! Imagine it: Rosen, an on-air reporter
|
All of Obama´s Scandals Are Ultimately About Information Control
|
|
National Review Online, by Jim Geraghty
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 9:26:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
There’s really no reason for the press to suggest that the recent slew of scandals involving the Obama administration — Benghazi, the AP phone-record seizure, the snooping in James Rosen’s e-mail, the IRS’s targeting of conservative groups, and so on — are a confusing jumble. There is a very clear thread running through all of the administration’s actions: The U.S. deputy chief of mission in Libya, Gregory Hicks, says that he was told not to speak to a member of Congress about Benghazi without a State Department lawyer present, that he received a phone call from Hillary Clinton’s
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
White House Chief of Staff knew about damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark
|
|
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.
|
Leaks turn to deluge for reeling White House
|
|
New York Post, by John Podhoretz
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 4:49:13 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The wheels came off the Obama administration yesterday. We learned of a startling assault on freedom of the press by the Department of Justice, following the revelation last week of the unprecedented information-gathering foray by that department against The Associated Press. Then, a few minutes later, the Justice Department’s inspector general released a report declaring that the US attorney in Arizona used the leak of a confidential memo to try to discredit a whistleblower in the notorious “gun-walking” scandal known as Fast and Furious (which got two federal agents killed). The leak was called “egregious.”
|
Top IRS official will invoke Fifth Amendment
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Richard Simon and Joseph Tanfani
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 3:53:35 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups. Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd. Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.
|
Anthony Weiner announces NYC mayor run
|
|
Politico, by Kevin Robillard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/22/2013 6:06:40 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Former Rep. Anthony Weiner, whose career in public life came to an abrupt end when he sent lewd pictures to a college student on Twitter, jumped back into politics on Wednesday by announcing a bid for mayor of New York City. “Look, I’ve made some big mistakes and I know I’ve let a lot of people down,” the Democrat said in a 2-minute video announcing his bid. “But I’ve also learned some tough lessons. I’m running for mayor because I’ve been fighting for the middle class and those struggling to make it for my entire life.
|
Howard Dean: ‘Benghazi is a Laughable Joke’
|
|
National Review Online, by Andrew Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 11:59:15 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Former Democratic National committee chairman Howard Dean considers the controversy over Benghazi a “joke” and “silly.” “Benghazi is a laughable joke,” Dean proclaimed twice in a discussion with Republican National Committee communications chairman Sean Spicer last week. “With all due respect, governor, when four Americans die serving this country, that’s not a joke, sir,” Spicer responded. “Oh, stop it,” said Dean. The former Democratic presidential candidate also said that there were “no serious questions being asked about Benghazi” and brushed it off as an effort by Republicans to score political points.
|
If Your Doctor Asks You About Guns, Do You Have to Answer?
|
|
Fox News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement
|
Democratic Senator uses Okla. tornado for anti-GOP rant over global warming
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: bamapreacher- 5/20/2013 8:20:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
While many Americans were tuned into news coverage of the massive damage from tornadoes ravaging the state of Oklahoma, Rhode Island Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse took to the Senate floor to rail against his Republican colleagues for denying the theory of anthropogenic global warming. Whitehouse spent 15 minutes chastising GOP senators and justified his remarks by alluding to states that seek federal assistance in the wake of natural disasters. “So, you may have a question for me,” Whitehouse said. “Why do you care? Why do you, Sheldon Whitehouse, Democrat of Rhode Island, care
|
| | |
|
|