A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Senate approves fiscal crisis
deal after missed deadline,
bill goes to House
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Senate approves fiscal crisis
deal after missed deadline,
bill goes to House

Fox News, by Ed Henry & Chad Pergram*

Original Article

Posted By:LittleHoodedMonk, 1/1/2013 2:34:13 AM

The Senate approved a scaled-down package early Tuesday morning aimed at halting historic tax hikes for most Americans and postponing across-the-board spending cuts, just hours after Congress missed a midnight deadline for action. The Senate voted 89-8 in favor of the package, which was hastily pulled together after a late-night deal between White House and Senate Republican negotiators. For the near-term, it appears a tax hike will technically go into effect on Jan. 1, as the midnight deadline was missed. In total, $600 billion in tax hikes and spending cuts are scheduled to hit in the new year

Comments:
*[Fox News' Mike Emanuel contributed to this report].


And so, in the dead of night, like most things hiding from the light, the dRATS charade goes forward.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: yuban, 1/1/2013 2:57:44 AM     (No. 9092612)

89-8 means more than Dems voted for it. The GOP is also at fault, again. No backbone or just Socialist lite?


Reply 2 - Posted by: janylou, 1/1/2013 3:04:19 AM     (No. 9092616)

Not at all crazy about this bill. Vote it down!


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Safari Man, 1/1/2013 3:13:02 AM     (No. 9092619)

At what point will the dims push their luck too far? When will all this backfire? I hope the gop has some serious surprises up their sleeve.


Reply 4 - Posted by: CentralFLMom, 1/1/2013 3:21:36 AM     (No. 9092622)

This entire process is a travesty.
I am keeping close track on those GOP members who voted for this deal. I hope they enjoyed their congressional run because our movement will do everything possible to punish and replace their heartless unAmerican soles.


Reply 5 - Posted by: ketchuplover, 1/1/2013 3:53:10 AM     (No. 9092630)

Oh, Pshaw! These are the hoodlums and gangsters that got us into this mess.....spending more than we took in, raiding S.S. and Medicare accounts -- all for boosting their own political prestige and personal gain. Now we are supposed to fall in reverence to their late-night struggles and "agreement?" Heck, no! Stand firm, House conservatives -- NO tax increases on anybody! Any Joe American can go in there and raise taxes, but that´s not where true courage and fortitude lie. Any Joe American who loves his country can go in there and make spending cuts, significant spending cuts and set examples that Americans will not take it anymore -- cut Congressional and Executive perks by at least 50 percent.


Reply 6 - Posted by: MissMann, 1/1/2013 4:04:00 AM     (No. 9092631)

Please, please, please House GOP: do NOT vote for this. It is time to be responsible. It isn´t often popular, but it is time for us to pay for the country we have created, else it will just get worse.

Really, even the cliff doesn´t pay for what we have already spent. It is time to start doing the right thing.


Reply 7 - Posted by: miceal, 1/1/2013 4:11:31 AM     (No. 9092634)

Stabbed in the back by Senate GOPers. A pox on them and their spawn. If "Mr. Speaker" wants to get reelected, he better turn his back on this travesty....


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: STLstudent, 1/1/2013 4:29:54 AM     (No. 9092645)

The GOP believes in nothing and will fight for nothing. The constitutional republic is gone.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Spidey, 1/1/2013 4:41:23 AM     (No. 9092650)

The whole idea behind this foolish exercise was to"freeze the target",that is House tea party people and make them the top villains in 2014.
If Boehner brings this to the floor,it will pass with dim votes,so his only choice is not bring it to the floor and the "crisis" could go on for weeks with the media stabbing the tea party people,every single day.

Obama wants to crow victory if everything goes right or blame Biden/McConnell if it goes wrong.What a farce him coming back to DC is/was.He probably just misses the WH booze cabinet.


Reply 10 - Posted by: Keekng, 1/1/2013 6:09:30 AM     (No. 9092672)

The entire Congress is made up mostly of self-serving spineless wimps, worried only about re-election. The entire lot of them should be replaced.


Reply 11 - Posted by: Ecclesiastes, 1/1/2013 6:26:46 AM     (No. 9092676)

But I WANT spending cuts.


Reply 12 - Posted by: krause, 1/1/2013 7:01:53 AM     (No. 9092699)

Well, I just want to congratulate congress, especially those long-termers for the magnificent way they have handled the people´s money over the years...16+ trillion in debt. But don´t worry, these same people will solve this problem! And they all make a minimum of $174,000 per year. Oops, I forgot, they just got a raise to a minimum $174,900.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: leopardtwo, 1/1/2013 7:11:56 AM     (No. 9092705)

The payroll tax will go up two percent in this ´deal´.


Reply 14 - Posted by: mws50, 1/1/2013 7:23:14 AM     (No. 9092716)

#13, no. It will go back to where it was. Cutting SS by that 2% was a stupid idea.

It would have been much more productive to reduce all government entities budgets by 1 cent on the dollar.


Reply 15 - Posted by: Mr. Hanky, 1/1/2013 7:34:15 AM     (No. 9092725)

Vote it down. Make this President sign a budget with actual spending cuts.


Reply 16 - Posted by: Bad Dog, 1/1/2013 7:50:30 AM     (No. 9092740)

I wish the Bill No. was in the story - I´d like to read it for myself, and I´d like to see the vote. Guess I´ll go searching.....


Reply 17 - Posted by: Bad Dog, 1/1/2013 8:06:44 AM     (No. 9092760)

The Senate Bill is available:
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=112&session=2&vote=00251#position

Tiny version:
http://tinyurl.com/bl37oo9

Here´s the short list of Nay votes:
Bennet (D-CO)
Carper (D-DE)
Grassley (R-IA)
Harkin (D-IA)
Lee (R-UT)
Paul (R-KY)
Rubio (R-FL)
Shelby (R-AL

Another short list of Not Voting:
DeMint (R-SC)
Kirk (R-IL)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)

And Fox News is, just this minute, reporting these specific vote totals.

So, there ya go.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: reformationmama, 1/1/2013 8:18:39 AM     (No. 9092774)

I thought I heard the sound of an empty can being kicked by empty suits in DC. Both my senators, Burr (R) and Hagan (D) voted for the bill. Where´s the backbone? Let´s hope the House will do the right thing.


Reply 19 - Posted by: uno, 1/1/2013 8:21:36 AM     (No. 9092777)

Ronald Reagan knew what we going to happen and in 1985 told us in an address to the country:
Every time in the past, when a government taxed the people past a certain level, trust in government began to erode. It would begin with efforts to avoid paying the full tax. This would become outright cheating and eventually a distrust in government itself until there would be a breakdown in law and order. How many times have we watched luxuries casually written off to be paid for by somebody else, that somebody being us the taxpayers.
Sound familiar? We´re headed for a breakdown in law and order right now with Hobby Lobby being only one example. 27 States have filed suit against Obamacare (which is a tax) with others ready to join in. Has John Kerry paid his yacht tax yet? Our problem may be due in part to a lack of revenue, but it is certainly not due to the lack of taxes. We´ve seen them do nothing but go up! The country´s fiscal issues are due to the insane, irresponsible spending of a dysfunctional government that is drunk with power so much so that even in the face of a crippling deficit, it can´t wait to spend even more on raises, waste, fraud and hand-outs which has only resulted in a lack of confidence to invest here. Cut the spending big time. Do what makes sense and restore confidence in the American system and we will see investment come back along with a successful economy and plenty of revenue as a result. Sadly however, does anyone really expect this administration to actually do something that makes sense in light of the fact that they have not done so in four years?


Reply 20 - Posted by: uno_thatguy, 1/1/2013 8:26:48 AM     (No. 9092785)

Byron York thinks it will pass in the House by a landslide. He says only 40 Reps are adamant about voting against it. That leaves more than 200 pubbies whom many vote for it.

Great Americans, all!!!! We´ll see.


Reply 21 - Posted by: jerrodmason, 1/1/2013 8:30:19 AM     (No. 9092790)

What about that pesky Constitution? Art 1 Section 7 states:

"All bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives"

The Supreme Court has ruled that the Senate can initiate bills that create revenue, but ONLY if the revenue is incidental and not directly a tax. In US v Munoz-Flores (495 US 385 [1990]), the Court said, "Because the bill at issue here was not one for raising revenue, it could not have been passed in violation of the Origination Clause."


Reply 22 - Posted by: JAN, 1/1/2013 8:35:31 AM     (No. 9092798)

It has been reported that 12 min. BEFORE midnight the IRS sent out the details of this deal as far as taxes are concerned.

Lot of posturing for some unknown reason.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: Judith, 1/1/2013 8:36:11 AM     (No. 9092801)

Don´t quote the Constitution to this people, especially the potus. To quote the potus "a flawed and irrelevant document". Seems our congress agrees with him.

Can you imagine running your own home/finances this way? Have no idea what your budget is, be heavily in debt, do nothing to curb spending or pay down your debt, just find another credit card and....CHARGE!


Reply 24 - Posted by: Starlady, 1/1/2013 8:39:14 AM     (No. 9092805)

A guest on Fox and Friends during the 6 a.m. Hour from American Majority Action said he thought the bill would be passed by the House Dems with a couple dozen moderate House GOPers to complete the votes needed.
If it comes to a vote it will be interesting to see how the GOP leadership votes. Will they be voting their own demise? This guest said he thought well over 100 conservative House members would not vote FOR this solution.


Reply 25 - Posted by: strike3, 1/1/2013 8:48:17 AM     (No. 9092817)

Higher taxes but delayed spending cuts. I was so blindsided by this development.


Reply 26 - Posted by: achingbackfarm, 1/1/2013 8:50:05 AM     (No. 9092820)

Anyone who thinks the ship of fools that is our goobermint would do what is good for AmeriKa, is delusional.


Reply 27 - Posted by: Eileen Tudor-Wright, 1/1/2013 8:54:48 AM     (No. 9092829)


*** We are now in permanent crisis mode. ***

That was a primary goal of the socialists.


Reply 28 - Posted by: bubby, 1/1/2013 9:08:11 AM     (No. 9092843)

My Senator John Cornyn from Texas voted to increase taxes on the "rich"! He´s part of the problem and he needs to go. The spending cuts will never materialize. What a joke the Republican party has become. If the House approves this load of bull droppings I will leave the Republican party!


Reply 29 - Posted by: Udanja99, 1/1/2013 9:21:39 AM     (No. 9092864)

Spending cuts? Ha ha ha ha ha. Zippy already said that the new revenue would be used for spending.


Reply 30 - Posted by: stablemoney, 1/1/2013 9:44:20 AM     (No. 9092905)

GOP representatives were not elected to vote for tax increases and no spending cuts.


Reply 31 - Posted by: federale, 1/1/2013 9:45:04 AM     (No. 9092907)

The tax bill that past the Senate seems reasonable. Spending cuts can be handled during the "raise-the debt-limit" process.


Reply 32 - Posted by: GOPSecretary, 1/1/2013 9:49:41 AM     (No. 9092915)

Well, on the bright side, the Senate passed a bill. First one,right?
Didn´t Iraq have the same problem until they threatened to stop thier salaries.


Reply 33 - Posted by: aasilver, 1/1/2013 9:53:12 AM     (No. 9092923)

Time to send a clear message to the GOP.

Re-register ´Independent´ tommorrow.


Reply 34 - Posted by: surfhut, 1/1/2013 9:54:21 AM     (No. 9092925)


Reply 35 - Posted by: surfhut, 1/1/2013 9:56:03 AM     (No. 9092930)

Sorry about that. Both of my senators here in OK voted for this. I´m beyond tired of politicians.


Reply 36 - Posted by: tangles, 1/1/2013 9:56:56 AM     (No. 9092931)

The drama queens have given us 2 more months of BS!


Reply 37 - Posted by: OperaBuff, 1/1/2013 10:16:50 AM     (No. 9092961)

"Who is a wise man and endued with knowledge among you? Let him shew out of a good conversation his works with meekness of wisdom. But if ye have bitter envying and strife in your hearts, glory not, and lie not against the truth.

"This wisdom descendeth not from above, but is earthly, sensual, devilish. For where envying and strife is, there is confusion and every evil work.

"But the wisdom that is from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, and easy to be intreated, full of mercy and good fruits, without partiality, and without hypocrisy. And the fruit of righteousness is sown in peace of them that make peace."


Reply 38 - Posted by: Butch59, 1/1/2013 10:17:13 AM     (No. 9092964)

I don´t think that anyone should take comfort that the House hasn´t yet passed this monstrosity. As previously posted, all it takes is a handful of RINO´s to vote for it along will all the Dims, and it will be on it´s way to Obozo. And then the bragging about it will began in earnest.

As for handling spending cuts during the next round of debit ceiling negotiations, don´t bet the farm on it. I´m still waiting for the cuts promised to Regan, by Clinton,
and to W. Bush. If we have those spending cuts, we wouldn´t need to raise the debit ceiling again. In short, there aren´t going to be any spending cuts, now or as long as dims control the Senate and the W.H.

The RINO´s need to go too.


Reply 39 - Posted by: Bpl40, 1/1/2013 10:21:27 AM     (No. 9092972)

$615 billion taxes and $15 billion ´expense savings´? To quote Queen Nancy "Are you serious.? Are you serious?"


Reply 40 - Posted by: Rinktum, 1/1/2013 10:21:35 AM     (No. 9092973)

We are witness to the biggest con in history. The grifters in Washington DC have pulled off, once again, nothing more than trickery in order to commit theft. Just once, I wish that the Republicans would stand on their principles but they ALWAYS cave which indicates to me they have no honor. The major concern for most of these knuckleheads is considering what the vote will do to effect their chances of re-election. Every Republican should have declined the pay raise that Lord Bountiful signed by Executive Order. It may be a small gesture but by accepting a raise when we are in dire financial straits is very telling. The mindset in Washington DC is so engrained in their thinking, that nothing will change it. They are the epitome of the entitlement class. We are living under a tyrannical government not much different than that of King George III. All that is missing are the powered wigs and spiffy red coats.


Reply 41 - Posted by: RancherJack, 1/1/2013 10:27:05 AM     (No. 9092985)

I didn´t create a fiscal crisis

You didn´t create a fiscal crisis

Why do you and I have to pay for a fiscal crisis LOSERS created?


Reply 42 - Posted by: 6079 Smith, W, 1/1/2013 11:16:02 AM     (No. 9093074)

It is the first day of 2013 and I fear we will have much more of this throughout the year. Happy New Year, everybody!


Reply 43 - Posted by: Janjan, 1/1/2013 11:31:56 AM     (No. 9093104)

This bill gets us nothing. A few billion more for these worthless politicians to spend. Obama talks about the deficit like he just got to Washington yesterday. His comments from the standard liberal playbook about how much tax cuts ´cost´ the government are typical and expected, like all income is theirs and what they let us keep is a gift. They are all a depressing bunch of incompetent arrogant fools and we are stuck with them and keep re-electing them. I am sorry to say I no longer really care what happens to this country.


Reply 44 - Posted by: chicodon, 1/1/2013 11:34:27 AM     (No. 9093108)

Yes, let´s dump it in Boehner´s lap. If it goes down they will blame the Tea Party with clean hands and replace them with blue blooded Republicans in 2014. I wouldn´t put it past them.


Reply 45 - Posted by: Lalo, 1/1/2013 11:37:51 AM     (No. 9093116)

This is what I´ve been hoping for in the realm of realistic hopes - staving off the tax spikes and raising the income limit from $250,000 to $400,000. I do hope and assume the House will consent; otherwise, I will write the Republicans off as idiots for sure. I cannot afford to stand on principle on this and go down with the ship.


Reply 46 - Posted by: Polecat49, 1/1/2013 11:38:36 AM     (No. 9093120)

As far as I´m concerned, little spineless mitch and the majority of senate so-called republicans can go straight to H-LL. mitch has sold us down the river once too many times. All compromise means to a democRAT is when "I drop my drawers, you kiss my butt".


Reply 47 - Posted by: noproblems, 1/1/2013 11:56:49 AM     (No. 9093136)

vote it down then remove the delay for the previously agreed to spending cuts.

The Repugs have no credibility left for agreeing to delaying the spending cuts. Time for a new party to replace the Repugs.


Reply 48 - Posted by: Ida Lou Pino, 1/1/2013 12:17:48 PM     (No. 9093172)

God bless the Pubbies!

We can always count on them to be the tax collectors for the welfare state. This bill has $41 in tax increases for every $1 in alleged spending cuts.

Way to go, Pubbies! The welfare state will live forever!


Reply 49 - Posted by: LC Chihuahua, 1/1/2013 12:19:01 PM     (No. 9093177)

Sounds like 90% of the senate is for more taxes and spending. Have to wonder how many of the ´no´ votes wanted more taxes and spending.

Thats what our government does. They trade legislation for votes and donations. Its like a form of prostitution. Too bad the taxpayer has to foot the bill.

Alot of people need to be reminded about the role of government.

Alot of our reps need to be fired.


Reply 50 - Posted by: Grambo, 1/1/2013 12:19:15 PM     (No. 9093179)

Tell me where in the constitution it says that historic tax and spend bills shall be arrived at, not by our elected representatives in open and thoughtful debate in Congress, but by the Vice President and Senate Minority leader in closed room in the dark of night?

Washington is broken. I no longer trust them with my money, and don’t want any from them. Include me out.


Reply 51 - Posted by: gwmcclintok, 1/1/2013 12:41:30 PM     (No. 9093232)

I am now beginning to respect Obama. He fights for his beliefs; he respects his base; he uses the power he won in an election; he is not ashamed of his left wing ideology; he refuses to appear on news programs that are not friendly; he spits on the opposition; he doesn´t answer questions he doesn´t like.
Now the Republicans are a bunch of chicken #@%^&*%$ butt kissers, compromising losers; arrogant haters of the regular guy(the base); wannabe lovers of the MSM; unprincipled money hogs. Just remember republican politicians: people feed pigs, they slaughter hogs.


Reply 52 - Posted by: reilly, 1/1/2013 12:54:04 PM     (No. 9093259)


Unless there´s real spending cuts, kill the bill. Obama wants no part of this for a reason. Make him deal with the math. Meanwhile, his second term agenda gets buried. Let it wait.


Reply 53 - Posted by: stealthy, 1/1/2013 1:01:39 PM     (No. 9093273)

Will Obama need a vacation now?


Reply 54 - Posted by: MEMcL, 1/1/2013 1:58:30 PM     (No. 9093334)

I have so-o little respect for the entire process and the elected officials on both sides. What kind of business rams a complex contract through in the dead of night and at the very last second! This is another case of not having time to read the bill and not finding out what is in it until after it passes. Major spending is just acquiesced to (such as green energy subsidies) because there are other major issues to fight for. That is a HUGE slush fund for Obama supporters that the Repubs just agreed to without close analysis. "We´ll give you energy and you give us milk subsidies." We will all be told "we don´t really like it, but it is the best we could do."

What company agrees to a contract that is disastrous for their business? Realizing how impossible it will be to prevail, I am getting close to wanting a 3rd party, or at least re-registering as a Conservative. The Republicans are impotent and will let you down every time.


Reply 55 - Posted by: NotaBene, 1/1/2013 2:59:54 PM     (No. 9093395)

The 47% of moochers that do not pay taxes are our problem. The Senate gives them extended Unemplyment Insurance so they need not work.



Post Reply   Close thread 717297




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "LittleHoodedMonk"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "LittleHoodedMonk"



Florida girl, 18, arrested and
expelled after relationship with
15-year-old female classmate
New York Daily News, by Erik Ortiz    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 5/21/2013 5:44:52 PM     Post Reply
An 18-year-old Florida student’s senior year has become a nightmare — all because she was in a same-sex relationship with a 15-year-old, her family says. Kaitlyn Hunt was arrested Feb. 16 for having a physical relationship with a younger classmate, who was her girlfriend at the time, mom Kelley Hunt Smith wrote on Facebook. Under Florida law, Hunt could see up to 15 years in prison and must register as a sex offender. A plea deal, however, remains on the table that would give Hunt two years´ house arrest and one year of probation, her family said. “Does my daughter deserve to lose her life for

Clear or nuclear:
Will Saudi Arabia get the bomb?
Al Arabiya [UAE], by Dr. Naser al-Tamimi    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 5/21/2013 5:27:52 PM     Post Reply
As the impasse over Tehran’s nuclear program worsens, those most likely to be directly affected by an Iranian bomb are showing greater alarm. While the media fixates on Israel and its possible reaction, other regional players have no less at stake. Despite Riyadh’s long-held advocacy of making the Middle East a zone free of weapons of mass destruction, there has been much speculation in the past few years about the possibility of its acquiring, or developing, nuclear weapons should Tehran obtain the bomb. In the words of Saudi King Abdullah: “If Iran developed nuclear weapons (...) everyone in the

Report: Iran hangs two spies
working for Israel and U.S.
Reuters, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 5/21/2013 5:15:17 PM     Post Reply
Dubai - Iranian authorities executed two men on Sunday convicted of working for Israeli and U.S. spy agencies, Iran’s Fars news agency reported. Mohammad Heidari, accused of passing security-related in formation and secrets to Israeli Mossad agents in exchange for money, and Kourosh Ahmadi, accused of gathering information for the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, were hanged at dawn, it said. The sentence for their execution was handed down by Tehran’s Revolutionary Court and confirmed by the country’s Supreme Court. The report did not say when the pair were arrested nor when their trial took place.

Vatican denies Pope Francis
performed ´exorcism´
BBC News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 5/21/2013 5:04:09 PM     Post Reply
The Vatican has denied claims that Pope Francis performed an exorcism, after TV images showed a man apparently reacting to him putting his hands on his head. The encounter - during Sunday Mass - was shown on a TV channel owned by the Italian bishops´ conference. The station quoted exorcists as saying there was "no doubt" the Pope had either performed an exorcism or a prayer to free the man from the devil. Its director later apologised for "having altered the truth". The Pope´s spokesman said he "did not intend to perform any exorcism".

Guatemalan Court Overturns
Genocide Conviction of Ex-Dictator
New York Times, by Elisabeth Malkin    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 5/21/2013 3:01:10 AM     Post Reply
Mexico City - Guatemala’s highest court on Monday threw out the genocide conviction and prison sentence of the former dictator Gen. Efraín Ríos Montt. The decision by Guatemala’s Constitutional Court was a dramatic legal victory for General Ríos Montt, 86, and a blow to human rights advocates who had called his conviction a sign that Guatemala’s courts would no longer allow impunity for the country’s powerful. General Ríos Montt was sent to prison immediately after the verdict on May 10 when a three-panel tribunal found him guilty of genocide and crimes against humanity.

IG Report Confirms: DOJ Official
Smeared Fast and Furious
Whistleblower John Dodson
Townhall, by Katie Pavlich    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 5/21/2013 2:49:40 AM     Post Reply
Monday the Department of Justice Inspector General [IG] confirmed what Townhall and other media outlets have been reporting for more than a year now: DOJ officials smeared Fast and Furious whistleblower and ATF Agent John Dodson. As a reminder, Dodson was the first whistleblower to expose Operation Fast and Furious. He revealed the operation´s connection to the murder of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry on to CBS News reporter Sharyl Attkisson on March 3, 2011. The IG report confirms that former U.S. Attorney Dennis Burke, who has a long personal and professional relationship with

Live Wire: M.E.´s Office
confirms 91 dead in Moore tornado
KOCO-TV [Oklahoma City, OK], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 5/21/2013 2:15:19 AM     Post Reply
Oklahoma City - State medical examiner´s office: 91 killed in Oklahoma tornado; death toll expected to rise. Spokeswoman Amy Elliott tells KOCO 5 that 51 of the deaths have been confirmed but that her office was awaiting the arrival of 40 more fatalities. Authorities say an elementary school in an Oklahoma City suburb took a direct hit from a mile-wide tornado. Gary Knight with the Oklahoma City Police Department says there is no word of injuries from the elementary school. Knight says the school suffered "extensive damage" on Monday afternoon. He did not say which school was hit.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



White House Chief of Staff knew about
damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark

61 replie(s)
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.

BREAKING: WashPost Reports
Obama DOJ Also Spied on
James Rosen of Fox News

49 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham    Original Article
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM     Post Reply
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:

Leaks turn to deluge
for reeling White House

48 replie(s)
New York Post, by John Podhoretz    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 4:49:13 AM     Post Reply
The wheels came off the Obama administration yesterday. We learned of a startling assault on freedom of the press by the Department of Justice, following the revelation last week of the unprecedented information-gathering foray by that department against The Associated Press. Then, a few minutes later, the Justice Department’s inspector general released a report declaring that the US attorney in Arizona used the leak of a confidential memo to try to discredit a whistleblower in the notorious “gun-walking” scandal known as Fast and Furious (which got two federal agents killed). The leak was called “egregious.”

Top IRS official will
invoke Fifth Amendment

48 replie(s)
Los Angeles Times, by Richard Simon and Joseph Tanfani    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 3:53:35 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups. Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd. Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.

White House Aide calls
Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´

41 replie(s)
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM     Post Reply
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.

If Your Doctor Asks You About
Guns, Do You Have to Answer?

39 replie(s)
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM     Post Reply
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement

Democratic Senator uses Okla.
tornado for anti-GOP rant
over global warming

39 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor    Original Article
Posted By: bamapreacher- 5/20/2013 8:20:54 PM     Post Reply
While many Americans were tuned into news coverage of the massive damage from tornadoes ravaging the state of Oklahoma, Rhode Island Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse took to the Senate floor to rail against his Republican colleagues for denying the theory of anthropogenic global warming. Whitehouse spent 15 minutes chastising GOP senators and justified his remarks by alluding to states that seek federal assistance in the wake of natural disasters. “So, you may have a question for me,” Whitehouse said. “Why do you care? Why do you, Sheldon Whitehouse, Democrat of Rhode Island, care


Post Reply   Close thread 717297





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~