|
|
| |
Topic: Pope says future of mankind at stake over gay marriage |
Pope says future of mankind at stake over gay marriage
Agence France-Presse, by Staff
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:JoniTx, 12/21/2012 3:22:01 PM
|
| Pope Benedict XVI has weighed in on a heated debate over gay marriage, criticising new concepts of the traditional family and warning that mankind itself was at stake. "In the fight for the family, the very notion of being – of what being human really means – is being called into question," the Pope said in Italian during an end-of-year speech. "The question of the family ... is the question of what it means to be a man, and what it is necessary to do to be true men," he said.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
ohyababy, 12/21/2012 3:29:38 PM (No. 9078272)
This from a man who heads an organization whose clergy sexually molested and abused children for decades. Who heads the same organization which moved these sexual predators from parish to parish so they could continue to prey upon children again and again. This man and his organization have lost the right to declare they have any moral leadership ever again.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
gramma b, 12/21/2012 3:38:33 PM (No. 9078287)
This non-Catholic is grateful to the Pope for speaking out in such strong terms. Let´s hope the Catholic Church always stands firm on this.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
VinGoombatz, 12/21/2012 3:50:36 PM (No. 9078302)
#1 your thoughts are understandable. But I have to suggest that the mistakes you cite are part and parcel of a broad from-the-ground-up horror in the human. Definitely not doxology. And much worse elsewhere. (You don´t want to be a young boy in Afghanistan with the taliban visiting your town.)
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
pearlyjo, 12/21/2012 3:57:19 PM (No. 9078319)
Ironic #1, since many of the people who helped shield/move/hide the perpetrators in the Church are themselves rather liberal in their approach to Church teaching and highly likely to be the very ones supporting gay "rights" and marriage and thus opposing the Pope´s stance.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
kelty, 12/21/2012 4:16:41 PM (No. 9078355)
It´s documented that the Pope protected the abusers as well.
He´s reaping what he sowed with the loss of moral authority.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
rc1776, 12/21/2012 4:19:30 PM (No. 9078361)
Actually same sex perversion is an effective population control measure so the leftist should repress the practice. Not only does that perverse union not produce offspring it promotes fatal diseases. The dimfecals should give that some thought since it (dimfecal ideology or lack thereof) will soon run out of wackos to steal votes. Oh no. We forgot the efficient overbreeders from washington and mexifornia. What a relief. We can still have our dimfecals.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
bdcaruba, 12/21/2012 4:43:04 PM (No. 9078388)
Guess he´s got no shot at secretary of defense.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
sunsong, 12/21/2012 4:48:50 PM (No. 9078394)
LOLOL - too funny
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
kanphil, 12/21/2012 6:08:56 PM (No. 9078486)
Oh, good, the Catholic bashers are back! Yes the abuse by the Priests were wrong, but Catholic Clergy are by no means the only ones guilty of this sin. Elmer Gantry was no Catholic. Jimmy Swaggart solicited whores on the streets. There is an unfortunate tradition that is decades and decades old of clergy of all stripes taking advantage of their charges. But they are a minuscule fraction. Most clergy, Catholic or not, do enormous amounts of good. It is certainly true that thousands and thousands of Catholic Priests do good and are loved by their parishioners. And the Catholic Church does enormous good throughout the world. You just happen to hate Catholics. Just say that and sign off. No need for a phony justification for your hate.
1
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
harleynyc, 12/21/2012 7:16:02 PM (No. 9078556)
I agree 100%. I won´t empower of do business with gays, muslims, commies.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
stablemoney, 12/21/2012 7:41:00 PM (No. 9078589)
The socialists have never believed in the family, individuals, or freedom. Socialists believe only in the state (they assume that will be them), coercion and compulsion.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
supersid, 12/21/2012 8:27:26 PM (No. 9078629)
Opposition to gay marriage is, quite literally, dying.
- George Will
http://www.businessinsider.com/george-will-gay-marriage-opposition-dying-2012-12
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
LoneVoice, 12/21/2012 9:34:26 PM (No. 9078687)
Gay marriage is evil.
It doesn´t matter if every person on Earth voted in favor of gay marriage it would still be evil.
We will reap the results of that evil.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
FormerDem, 12/21/2012 9:57:29 PM (No. 9078707)
Catholic-bashing isn´t going to make the truth go away. And #1 that is total distortion. Not going to bother with it but your post is slanderous. Anyway, what the Holy Father said is true. No one´s going to like this, but - when oral contraceptives came out the Church said artificial contraception would lead to abortion and people said How Ridiculous. Then the Church said abortion would lead to euthanasia and people said, How Ridiculous. Then the Church said that euthanasia would bring down civilization. How Ridiculous. ?They know what human beings are, and how the culture is built. It´s not a good idea to go around knocking down pillars that you don´t see the need for in a building you don´t understand. Things aren´t immortal just because you take them for granted. Eventually it all goes down.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
anonymous, 12/21/2012 10:05:54 PM (No. 9078714)
If gay marriage is a threat to mankind, the underlying assumption is that the majority of men would find marriage to a man more attractive than marriage to a woman. I use men here as an example because the Vatican emphasizes the role of men more than it does the role of women in procreation.
It´s an interesting assumption. Inherent within it is the notion that the majority of men are capable of relations with both genders. The Vatican´s line of thinking is therefore in tune with Kinsey´s research findings.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
adguy47, 12/21/2012 10:35:15 PM (No. 9078733)
#14 says #1 is distorting the truth? #14, there are none so blind as those who will not see. He´s not the Holy Father. He´s an old man in a dress who heads a church that, for decades, covered up for pedophiles. Argue with that. Merry Christmas.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
ColonialAmerican1623, 12/21/2012 11:10:05 PM (No. 9078761)
Good statement, but hypocritical.
However, let´s not eat our own.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
ohyababy, 12/22/2012 7:44:54 AM (No. 9079014)
# 14 How is anything I said slanderous when it has been proven to be true with the trials and convictions of some of the priest who abused and sexually molested children. Also, the catholic church in the US has paid out 2 billions dollars so far to abuse victims in the US and now a bishop has been convicted in Federal court and received a prison sentence for aiding and abetting priests who molested and abused children in his diocese. The catholic church in Ireland has also been investigated for the same molestations and abuse of children as their counterparts in the US.
Ans I´ll say it again this religion and this pope have no moral authority left.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "JoniTx"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "JoniTx"
|
|
Obama admits he’s a socialist
|
|
New York Post, by Kyle Smith
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:59:42 PM
Post Reply
|
|
You may be forgiven if you missed it during last week’s tsunami of scandals, but President Obama finally let slip that he is a socialist. Buried in the 17th paragraph of one of those mewling New York Times pieces on the woes of Obama — can we start calling him Woe-bama yet? — appeared these two words: “going Bulworth.” Obama himself, the Times explained, has been “longingly” telling his inner circle that what he’d really like to do is what Sen. Jay Bulworth, played by Warren Beatty in his 1998 movie “Bulworth,” did: to go public as
|
Candy Crowley: Is it Possible This Isn´t Political and IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass the Tea Party?
|
|
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week
|
| |
|
WH: Legality of IRS Action Against Conservatives ´Irrelevant´
|
|
Breitbart Big Government, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:43:10 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Appearing on Sunday morning on ABC News’ This Week, White House Senior Adviser Dan Pfeiffer told a credulous George Stephanopoulos that the IRS’ targeting of conservative groups was “inexcusable,” and that the law with regard to the activity was “irrelevant.” “I can’t speak to the law here,” he said. “The law is irrelevant. The activity was outrageous and inexcusable, and it was stopped and it needs to be fixed so we ensure it never happens again.” When asked for clarification, Pfeiffer expounded: “What I mean is, whether it’s legal or illegal is not important to the fact
|
WH: ´Irrelevant´ Who Edited Benghazi Talking Points
|
|
Breitbart Big Government, by William Bigelow
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:40:46 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Appearing on CBS’ Face the Nation, White House senior adviser Dan Pfeiffer said that it was “largely irrelevant” who edited the talking points the Obama administration trotted out in the aftermath of the terrorist attack in Benghazi on September 11, 2012. Host Bob Schieffer asked, “That was just a PR plan, to send out somebody who didn’t know anything about what had happened. Why did you do that? Why didn’t the Secretary of State come and tell us what they knew, and if they knew nothing, say ‘We don’t know yet?’ …. Why are you here today?
|
WH: ´Irrelevant´ Where Obama Was During Benghazi Attacks
|
|
Breitbart Big Government, by Ben Shapiro
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:37:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
On Fox News Sunday this morning, White House spokesman Dan Pfeiffer was asked by Chris Wallace where in the White House President Obama was during the September 11, 2012 terrorist attack in Benghazi that killed four Americans. “Question,” asked Wallace. “What did the President do the rest of that night to pursue Benghazi?” Pfeiffer answered, “Look, the President was kept up to date on this as it was happening the entire night, from the moment it started until the very end …. I recognize that there’s a series of conspiracy theories Republicans have been spinning about it
|
Non-deportation rate drops — to 99.2 percent
|
|
Washington Times [DC], by Stephen Dinan
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:28:53 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Homeland Security Department has granted legal status to 99.2 percent of all illegal immigrants who have applied under President Obama’s new non-deportation policy for young adults, according to the latest numbers released Friday. That’s a slight drop from the 99.5 percent approval rate reported last month. The policy, known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, grants legal status to most illegal immigrants under the age of 31 who came to the U.S. before age 16 — usually brought by their parents. They are allowed to remain in the U.S. without fear of deportation, and are given work
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Analyze this
|
|
Power Line, by Scott Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript
|
Evidence emerges that Obama administration official knew of IRS targeting during 2012 campaign
|
|
CBS News, by Margaret Brennan
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 5/18/2013 9:01:39 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON - There were new questions Saturday night concerning if anyone in the White House was aware of the IRS´ targeting of conservative groups. Inspector General Russell George said he informed a deputy at the Treasury Department in June of 2012 about the probe into the IRS. The Treasury Department confirmed the timeline but said they did not know the details of the investigation until last week.(Snip)Marcus Owens ran the tax-exempt division at the IRS for 10 years. He said it isn´t difficult to figure out who´s doing what at the agency.
|
Obama: "As An African American You Have To Work Twice As Hard As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"
|
|
Real Clear Politics, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM
Post Reply
|
|
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life
|
Camelot Is Burning
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Christopher Burton
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: mitzi- 5/18/2013 8:16:11 PM
Post Reply
|
|
It began in earnest last Friday. A flash mob of latte drinking, tofu eating media that has done its best to quell, rather than fan the flames of truth, turned on one of their own. Jay Carney lay bludgeoned at the base of the podium, a victim of friendly fire. Ironically, the attack was reminiscent of the one in Benghazi he has repeatedly denied the Administration he represents bears any responsibility for. “Changed twelve times?!” came the cries. And with good reason. We were misled; no, lied to.
|
Watergate 2.0 -- why the IRS scandal is far worse
|
|
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,
|
Lew asks Congress for debt increase, says it’s ´not open to debate´
|
|
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.
|
McCaskill Calls For Firing Of All Involved In IRS Targeting Scandal
|
|
KMOX [St, Louis], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/18/2013 2:46:31 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Washington – Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-MO, issued a video statement Friday in response to reports that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative nonprofit groups. (Snip) “There’s a reason Lady Justice wears a blindfold in America. That is because in America, we don’t apply the law based on who you are, who you know, or what you believe. We apply the law equally.” “We should not only fire the head of the IRS, which has occurred, but we’ve got to go down the line and find every single person who had anything to do with this and make sure
|
| | |
|
|