Morning Joke. Who cares what he thinks?

Joe Scarborough needs to visit a mental health professional, as well as turn in his firearms. Morning Joke, indeed.

Obama and the democrats are using it to fund-raise.

But that´s not politicizing the tragedy, right?

The unhinged become more unhinged.

Why does any member of the GOP appear on these shows? Are they that hard up for attention?

What would we do without the media to tell us how to think and feel?

It is a rare event when any person in Power, advocates the for 2nd Amendment. It is even more rare, to see an armed terrorist shooting up a police station, NRA meeting, gun shop or gun range.

Joe Biden, Joe Scarborough....not an ounce of brains between them.

Want proof...just read how itch has put her two cents in..all political...gotta get Americans to give up their guns...need complete control....

This is not going to end well.

I guess I´m confused. Was Joe not concerned about guns and his childrens´ safety prior to the shootings last week? I don´t recall him being on an assault weapon ban bandwagon before this. I could be wrong, but I don´t think so.
Kinda like this whole fiscal cliff thing going on right now and very little discussion of it during the election season. Now all of a sudden it´s the biggest threat known to man.
Get over yourself Joe.
Huelskamp for Speaker.

Huelskamp´s remarks were inappropriate. How dare he say that anyone´s reaction to this tragedy is political. I am a Republican, but I am embarrassed that people in my party think that the only reason to talk about proposed law changes that could save lives is political. Get over it! Seriously mentally ill people do not need access to weapons period, and especially the type that can fire off multiple rounds in a matter of seconds. Change the laws to make this sort of access far more difficult.

So what happens when placing a ban on assault weapons and related attachments fails to provide clear results in weapon used deaths in our country? Being from NJ, seems to me it´s the same philosophy that if we throw enough money into poor school districts we will improve their education achievement.....so 20 yrs. later we are still awaiting for the positive results!

Joe´s hysterical response proved the point.

Scarborough is a huckster and a fool.

Joe Scarborough= Chris Matthhew´s younger , dumber brother.

Joe went over the edge years ago.

He has loser written all over him.

#14, perhaps you´d feel more at home at huffpo or one of the other unhinged, treasonous libtard (but I repeat myself) sites, where the level of ignorance and misinformation displayed by your comments is seen as deeply informed thinking.

Let´s cut to the heart of the matter. The government in the hands of statists poses a much more tangible threat to me, my property and my liberty than a nut with a semiautomatic weapon. I fear the tyranny of the mob. The second amendment exists to provide us with some degree of protection if we fail to preserve liberty via the ballot box.

I really hate to admit that at one time I voted for this fraud.

Joe Scarborough has been over the edge for years.

It really upsets liberals...and the seminar posters...when people point out the liberal strategy for gun control is based on wading in the blood of innocents. Always has been, always will be.

#1...Best, most succinctly worded reply of the day. Thank you.
I might add that as long as the tyrants and the mob fear it, it will never be needed. Once we are weakened to a point that they feel comfortable its too late.

Poor Joe - still desperately trying to find a way to become BHO´s mouthpiece.

I meant #21. Another keyboard hiccup.

#14 you sound mentally ill to me, maybe the government should ban your free speech rights.

What 20 said...

What #20 and #29 & #30 said. BTW why do some continue to claim-to-be-republican?..Pathetic..

Scarborough has to take a very liberal position on gun control if he wants to keep his job on MSNBC.

I agree that the law should be toughened up to keep the mentally ill from obtaining firearms that they could use to murder a large number of people. But individual people must also take responsibility for safeguarding the firearms that they legally own. It is gross irresponsibility when a person leaves their firearms insecure where a mentally ill person living in their household can take possession of them.

Also it is an overreaction by government to talk up banning and confiscating legally owned firearms from hundreds of millions of law abiding Americans who have not shot anyone, in an overreaching political maneuver because of the homicidal criminal actions of a few mentally ill people.

No, Joe, you´re even worse, you´re exploiting this for ratings and profit.

And to our repeat poster, who is weighing in on every one of these threads about how they are ´´embarrassed.´´ I sympathize with your take on mental health issues, but what specifically are you proposing? limits on magazines? Mandatory psychiatric screening to purchase a gun? A return to the ineffectual ´´assault weapons ban?´´ Which of Connecticut´s many gun laws failed us?

The folks who are politicizing this (from the left) are just dragging out the same tired talking points that have been argued about and discredited (for the most part). They ARE using this to further their own political agenda.

Go away Joe. and stop killing your interns.

Rep Huelskamp is a true conservative. Joe is not.

Of course it is. The ´explosion´ was caused by the truth touching the guilt nerve.