A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC



        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


  Topic: Piers Morgan Calls Pro-Gun
Advocate ´Unbelievably Stupid,´
´Dangerous´: ´You Shame Your Country´
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Piers Morgan Calls Pro-Gun
Advocate ´Unbelievably Stupid,´
´Dangerous´: ´You Shame Your Country´

NewsBusters, by Noel Sheppard

Original Article

Posted By:pineledger, 12/19/2012 1:54:29 PM

CNN´s Piers Morgan has been on a rabid anti-gun rant since July´s Aurora, Colorado, shootings that has gotten even more venomous after Friday´s massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticut. On Tuesday, he rudely and disgracefully tore into guest Larry Pratt, the Executive Director of Gun Owners of America, calling him "an unbelievably stupid man" who´s "dangerous," concluding the interview by saying, "You shame your country" (video follows with transcript and commentary):

Comments:
Piers Morgan is an unbelievably stupid man who should go back to England, if they´ll have him, since he finds Americans so disgusting.

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: paulfromTexas, 12/19/2012 2:00:21 PM     (No. 9074646)

I thought we ran those pasty faced brits off a couple of centuries ago.
Go eat your porridge Piers..

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: MattMusson, 12/19/2012 2:03:45 PM     (No. 9074652)

Pro Illegal Immigration Advocates are ´Unbelievable Stupid,´ ´Dangerous´: ´They Shame Their Country.´

Since illegals kill 3500 Americans each year by driving drunk. And, they kill another 3,000 to 4,000 each year in flat out homicides.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Chief1942, 12/19/2012 2:03:52 PM     (No. 9074653)

The big difference between Americans and those of Piers Morgan, we are a reasonbly free people, they are now and have always been "subjects". Never personally watch CNN and for this very reason.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: absalom, 12/19/2012 2:07:25 PM     (No. 9074664)

Agreed, Morgan is a pompous jackass and a man of shallow morality. Nevertheless Pratt´s selt-defense argument is beyond stupid. Why is it not as self-evident as
2+2=4; that weaponry designed solely for military use should never be avaiable to the civilian population?????????????

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: mws50, 12/19/2012 2:12:46 PM     (No. 9074676)

#4 I suggest you educate yourself about the meaning behind our 2nd amendment rights, and why weaponry designed solely for military purposes is essential for citizens to keep and bear, and must remain readily available to the citizens of the USA.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Dante, 12/19/2012 2:14:12 PM     (No. 9074679)

More people will read this tread today than will see his show this month.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: capt scurvey, 12/19/2012 2:20:02 PM     (No. 9074698)

This fop seems to be positioning himself as the new poster boy of the American mullet...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Redneck In NY, 12/19/2012 2:22:46 PM     (No. 9074707)

Geez #4, really? Muskets were designed solely for military use. The 03´ Springfield, Enfield rifle, M1 Garand, and yes the AR-15 were all designed for military use. Oh, so was the Jeep.

Read a bit of firearm history, almost all firearms derive some sort of design, function, or asthetics from the military.

A AR-15, (5.56 or .223) platform is demonized by a rabid media and anti-gun agenda because of how it looks. If I had to pick a rifle to survive with, it def wouldn´t be that. Probably a lever action 30/30, or perhaps a carbine in 45/70.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: jintz, 12/19/2012 2:24:52 PM     (No. 9074713)

another reason why I dont watch CNN..


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: LAW428, 12/19/2012 2:25:49 PM     (No. 9074715)

Morgan, your country is on the trash heap because of people like you. Leave ours alone! You are the "unbelievably stupid" one. You are the poster child of ignorance.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: Namma, 12/19/2012 2:28:42 PM     (No. 9074720)

why doesnt piers morgan ask the people who were saved from being shot in Texas by an off duty concealed carry policeWOMEN....she heard the gun shots and shot the person with the gun...but thats the "rest of the story" that no one will hear about. I believe this happend within the last few days..so the info is still out there...all piers has to do is look it up.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: bob913, 12/19/2012 2:29:15 PM     (No. 9074724)

This is the only way he can get ratings for his show on cnn....

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: absalom, 12/19/2012 2:36:41 PM     (No. 9074744)

#5. W/respect to the 2nd Amendment, it is 221 years old; ratified when rapid fire amounted to 3 shots per minute of rifle fire accurate up to 50 meters by trained infantry. Suggest you acquaint yourself w/the reality that modern weaponry is much more efficient. Most importantly, virtually the entire colonial population were hunters of necessity. The obtuse gun fanatics will be the death of the 2nd Amendment.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: absalom, 12/19/2012 2:40:18 PM     (No. 9074750)

#5. W/respect to the 2nd Amendment, it is 221 years old; ratified when rapid fire amounted to 3 shots per minute of rifle fire accurate up to 50 meters by trained infantry. Suggest you acquaint yourself w/the reality that modern weaponry is much more efficient. Most importantly, virtually the entire colonial population were hunters of necessity. The obtuse gun fanatics will be the death of the 2nd Amendment.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: Polecat49, 12/19/2012 2:43:39 PM     (No. 9074757)

#4, You sound like piers. EVERYONE, has to like what you like and ALL OTHERS have to kiss up, give up their rights as an American just so you can say you are better. A lot of hunters use AR-15s because they can afford them and they are accurate. Not all hunters or people interested in their own lives can afford a two or three thousand rifle or hand gun.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: Redneck In NY, 12/19/2012 2:46:32 PM     (No. 9074761)

Ah, the old "well the 2nd Amendment is sooo old" arguement. Ok, lets update it, but then where do you stop? Say, lets update the 1st too! And all those other pesky, dusty old words are hard to understand, let alone apply to todays modern life. States rights? Pshhh, we are a global community now, delete it, and on and on.

Polyanna, meet slippery slope.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: Feebie, 12/19/2012 2:48:09 PM     (No. 9074765)

There is a big difference between Brits and Yanks. I believe there was a war fought over that difference quite a few years back.

History rhymes.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: antiquegolf, 12/19/2012 2:49:08 PM     (No. 9074767)

Post 13 and 14, you can say that again. /sar

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: fishbone, 12/19/2012 2:52:49 PM     (No. 9074775)

#4/14, you really do need to educate yourself about the purpose of the 2nd amendment. It is a last resort to protect the People from a tyrannical and abusive government. What you propose is to virtually hogtie the populace and place them into an immediate inferior role in the event of any confrontation with said tyrannical government. Personally, I think that I should be able to acquire any weapon available to the military. After all, we paid for all their toys anyway.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 20 - Posted by: J F Ackerman, 12/19/2012 3:07:35 PM     (No. 9074794)

Pratt was completely unprepared for this dispicable man and CNN. No one should go on these shows who isn´t prepared to defend the original intent of the Framers. We need our guns to defend ourselves from tyranny and tyrants- read that DEMOCRATS! "When in the course of human events....!"

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: uno_thatguy, 12/19/2012 3:11:32 PM     (No. 9074806)

I postulated the SCOTUS decision in favor of gun ownership for personal protection to a raging liberal I know and her response was, "Well the SCOTUS is made up of a bunch of radical right-wingers."

"Yeah, like Jefferson, Washington, FRanklin and thousands who fought to throw off the chains of Britain and establish our Constitution? Now, give me some facts to support your view that guns in the hands of responsible citizens increases gun violence. Show me the stats that the ban on "assault weapons" reduced crime by, uh... How much?"

Waiting, waiting, waiting!!!

Common answers to facts: "That´s a lie." "Where´d you get those facts?" "That´s what a bunch of radical gun nuts always say."

Still waiting!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 22 - Posted by: Teleologicus, 12/19/2012 3:13:35 PM     (No. 9074811)

It is ironic, but it never fails: the malice and moral vanity of Leftists propels them a giant step in the direction of the violence they profess to abhor. Leftists hate their political opponents with a virulence that is not easily matched by most conservatives. This is because Leftists think they know everything, that they are never wrong, that they are totally disinterested and that their only goal is the betterment of humanity. This is a potentially lethal combination, as we have seen in nations where extreme Leftists, Communists, etc. acquire absolute power. They invariably use such power to suppress, silence, imprison and, all too often, murder their political opponents.

When one believes oneself to be on the side of the angels, when he mistakes his personal beliefs for incontrovertible, sacred and necessary Truth, the category of political disagreement is abolished and replaced by those of evil, stupidity, or insanity.

Dogmatic Leftism is definitely on the rise. It is one thing to hold strong beliefs and to argue passionately for them; it is quite another to insist that no other opinion could possibly be valid or ethical. The tragic thing is that it is our intelligentsia who have succumbed to their partisan hatreds to the extent that their reason have gone to sleep and become merely a tool for exerting power over others. This has happened before. It is a bad sign when the intellectual class, the academics and the guardians of critical reason and history become submerged in their ideology.

The news anchor´s verbally abusing someone whose only offense is to disagree with him about gun control is a reflection of the increasing dogmatism and malice of the Left.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: JAN, 12/19/2012 3:23:14 PM     (No. 9074833)

Piers and Soledad, time sharing a brain.

Each with half the IQ needed for critical thinking skills.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 24 - Posted by: NavalAviatorRet, 12/19/2012 3:31:36 PM     (No. 9074849)

The fool on here commenting on how I, and my fellow citizens, shouldn´t have access to military-quality weapons should understand the true purpose of the 2nd Amendent. It has very little, to nothing to do with hunting or sport shooting, and everything to do with keeping a tyrannical government in check (with an ancillary benefit of self-defense). I would suggest that if you find AR type weaponry so scary, just don´t look at them.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 25 - Posted by: STLstudent, 12/19/2012 3:32:15 PM     (No. 9074851)

Because we (those living in the colonies) had firearms and knew how to use them, we kicked the collective behind of the British in the 18th century. Yes Piers Morgan, we kicked your ancestors´ rear end. So we are not surrendering our guns, and we will not be like your pitiful self. You English serf!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 26 - Posted by: pinkpanther, 12/19/2012 3:35:13 PM     (No. 9074858)

Piers is Irish, not English (though you wouldn´t know from the accent) and the 2nd amendment was made so that the citizens could have access to the same weapons the government had. Just because the Constitution was made during the time of muskets doesn´t mean the need still isn´t there, after all, the government no longer uses muskets now do they?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 27 - Posted by: logiclogger, 12/19/2012 3:48:50 PM     (No. 9074878)

I like the twisted logic of the ignorant that has to defend that ´..well regulated militia...´ does not intend for military style weapons. You don´t like the 2nd amendment then petition to change it. Otherwise, don´t be an intellectual doofus.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 28 - Posted by: Marzon, 12/19/2012 3:49:13 PM     (No. 9074879)

By poster #4/14´s "logic", the First Ammendment should not apply to the telephone, movies, radio, television, the internet, or any modern communication technologies. After all such technologies were never dreamed of when the Constitution was written and the have vastly increased our capacity to communicate versus the technologies of the 1780´s, Far more so than the capabilities of modern guns have improved relative to those of the same era.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 29 - Posted by: Israel putnam, 12/19/2012 4:07:36 PM     (No. 9074906)

The talk never changes. We denizens of Lucianne offer logic ,reason and (usually ) civil discourse which goes ignored. The other side pounds their manicured fists and shout slogans borrowed from Hitler and Stalin. I ´ve thought it through and I can´t help but think this is going to end in one of two ways badly or really badly i.e. either a civil divorce or a Civil War. I don´t have much faith in the first option happening (sigh).

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 30 - Posted by: absalom, 12/19/2012 4:09:16 PM     (No. 9074910)

Predictibly, abuse is the first and last retort of the vincibly ignorant. As I said, the gun nuts will be the death of the 2nd Amendment. Hey let´s allow the populace to purchase mortars, missles, tanks etc. That´ll surely make us feel safer knowing that Harry down the street has an arsenal.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 31 - Posted by: krause, 12/19/2012 4:10:13 PM     (No. 9074914)

Wasn´t he a ´personal valet´ before he came over here. Piers!

Citizens´ guns need to keep pace with the technology. Do you think only the government should have guns? How stupid.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 32 - Posted by: logiclogger, 12/19/2012 4:12:31 PM     (No. 9074919)

#31 you do know that civilians can purchase tanks, rpgs, machine guns, etc right now don´t you?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 33 - Posted by: LadyHen, 12/19/2012 4:12:49 PM     (No. 9074921)

#4/14... so by your argument, the entirety of the Constitution, since it is an old document, has somehow been made obsolete by age and needs to be updated for the "modern world." You do realize THAT is exactly what you are saying, don´t you? Let us see how that works on all the other amendments as well, shall we? Your kind of shortsighted thinking is the same as that of the "living document" people that would happily rob us of every right we have been guarantee by our old Constitution in the name of progress and modern thinking. It is not an idea that has any place in an honest discussion amongst free people. Stop reasoning with your emotions and start reasoning with the brain the Founder´s intended you to use as an American.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 34 - Posted by: tocsin, 12/19/2012 4:17:03 PM     (No. 9074926)

"A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government." -- George Washington

I´m trying to find how our 1st Predident would have made a distinction between a Kenucky Long Rifle and a mini-14 based on the above comment.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 35 - Posted by: shamrock, 12/19/2012 4:18:20 PM     (No. 9074929)

#31, we can get all those goodies and yes I do feel safer knowing my neighbors are as well armed as I am.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 36 - Posted by: LadyHen, 12/19/2012 4:18:51 PM     (No. 9074930)

#31... you complain about abuse at our hands while YOU call us "ignorant," "gun fanatics," and "gun nuts." That is rich.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 37 - Posted by: NYbob, 12/19/2012 4:19:57 PM     (No. 9074935)

Unbelievably stupid is ignoring the factual data that has been out there long before this tragic failure of the US mental health system. How willful does someone like the smug simpleton, Morgan, have to be in order to avoid looking at areas with shall issue laws vs Chicago or NYC? Dangerous is a pontificating dope who pretends that the gun policies of Vermont don´t exist next to NY. How dumb does a person have to be in order to not comprehend the differences and the causes of murder in a state where you need an exhaustive months long, judge approved, check vs a state where none of that is applied? The answer is, as dumb as the punk Morgan. On the other hand if you dance with this snake, you should be ready to dance.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 38 - Posted by: Italiano, 12/19/2012 4:21:21 PM     (No. 9074937)

In the Brain-Dead Post(s) of the Day competition, it appears that we have a winner.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 39 - Posted by: Vaquero45, 12/19/2012 4:22:57 PM     (No. 9074941)

Button your lip, Morgan - or we won´t send any guns to Britain when your back is against the wall, like we did in WWII.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 40 - Posted by: stonepony, 12/19/2012 4:27:04 PM     (No. 9074955)

too funny. cnn does not have a clue why their ratings are in the tank...........stupid is as stupid does...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 41 - Posted by: tocsin, 12/19/2012 4:36:00 PM     (No. 9074967)

#27-you slander my ancestors, sir!

from Wiki:´´Piers Morgan was born on 30 March 1965, in Guildford, Surrey, England, to Eamon Vincent O´Meara, a dentist, of Dorking, Surrey,´´

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 42 - Posted by: Dreemaun, 12/19/2012 4:36:54 PM     (No. 9074970)

You´re confusing us with people who care what you think. Go back to where you came from.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 43 - Posted by: NYbob, 12/19/2012 4:44:14 PM     (No. 9074981)

LOL, #42. A dad from ´Dorking.´ NOW I understand Morgan´s problem.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 44 - Posted by: bighambone, 12/19/2012 4:56:49 PM     (No. 9074989)

Why do they allow an Englishman to appear on USA television to tell US citizens how the USA should operate. I thought the Continental Army fought a revolutionary war, and the US Armed Forces fought a second war against England about 30 years later to keep that from happening?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 45 - Posted by: pinkpanther, 12/19/2012 5:11:21 PM     (No. 9074999)

#42 Piers himself said he was Irish on his show. I didn´t mean any slander against the Irish, we all have our village idiots!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 46 - Posted by: pinkpanther, 12/19/2012 5:13:08 PM     (No. 9075003)

Here it is from Piers himself. He´s still a moron though, regardless of his ancestry.

http://www.irishcentral.com/ent/Piers-Morgan-proud-to-be-Irish-99192524.html

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 47 - Posted by: mary Ellen, 12/19/2012 5:22:27 PM     (No. 9075013)

Piers Morgan is a prissy little twit.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 48 - Posted by: absalom, 12/19/2012 5:31:41 PM     (No. 9075029)

#34. Listen up Hen. If you had read my intial post rather than reacted viscerally to it, you might have grasped that my time line was to give historical context to the Amendment, not to malign it as out of date. So spare me your sanctimony. No doubt we´ll soon be told that the 2nd Amendment is actually the 2nd Commandment and God´s Will. All the zealots are doing is marginalizing themselves and setting themselves up for a defeat w/their absurdities. So be it.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 49 - Posted by: Theeo, 12/19/2012 5:42:58 PM     (No. 9075049)

Piers (Ripe ´S´) Morgan, with the nassty odor of one of those Brits.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 50 - Posted by: Sheepfarmer, 12/19/2012 5:59:28 PM     (No. 9075074)

Go home, Piers.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 51 - Posted by: tocsin, 12/19/2012 6:02:15 PM     (No. 9075080)

#46-Sorry, I should use the s/ more often.
My Parents were from Ireland(CoMayo & Co Claire). I was born in the US and am an American.I am a Citizen with rights.
Prigg Morgan was born in Britain. He is a Subject with priviledges.
No wonder he is confused.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 52 - Posted by: WIBadger, 12/19/2012 6:02:21 PM     (No. 9075081)

Shame my country does he ? Well you Piers are an embarassment to yours as well. Feel free to transport your metrosexual candy-arse back to the land of bad health care & rotten teeth anytime you are so inclined.

Girley-man wuss....

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 53 - Posted by: leopardtwo, 12/19/2012 6:08:50 PM     (No. 9075089)

Stick a sock in it, Piers!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 54 - Posted by: Manitouman, 12/19/2012 6:43:41 PM     (No. 9075128)

#- 31
Tom, Dick AND Harry already have arsenals. That´s one reason this country has never been attacked by ground forces.

Warms the cockles of my heart.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 55 - Posted by: LadyHen, 12/19/2012 6:54:51 PM     (No. 9075140)

#49... then what amount of abdication of freedom will soothe your conscience? What amount of compromise and reaching across the aisle and capitulation to the emotion ridden, illogical left will make you comfy? I, for one, am curious to see how far you and Morgan and others like you think we should kowtow, bow, grovel, and scrape the ground before Obama to be able to exercise our rights.

No compromise we make, no freedom we willingly hand over, no capitulation in spite of facts that support our side, no amount of grovelling and kissing of their feet will ever satisfy the leftist ideologues. They will not rest until all guns are taken and all freedom suspended in favor of the "will of the people." Why should we make this task easier for them? Why should we hand over ground to them without a fight? To win brownie points with the very forces that seek our destruction?


The stark and blinding reality to all who have eyes to see is these leftist ideologues whose self appointed righteousness never sleeps wish to strip us of our 2nd Amendment rights thus freeing them to strip us of all our other rights. It is the way of dictators, emperors, and thugs throughout history. Failure to recognize this immutable fact is a shortcoming indeed.

As it is, I have said my peace.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 56 - Posted by: 4Justice, 12/19/2012 7:32:44 PM     (No. 9075177)

The commie Alinskyites are using ridicule in massive doses again...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 57 - Posted by: Keekng, 12/19/2012 8:02:49 PM     (No. 9075203)

Whuddaya say, we simply deport the mindless twit, Morgan?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 58 - Posted by: NYbob, 12/19/2012 8:21:52 PM     (No. 9075236)

I´m pretty sick of gun haters and clueless hunters crying about ´military´ weapons. At the distances involved, a pump shotgun is much more deadly. First, it won´t jam. Second, it sends out nine 00 buck shot per trigger pull. Each shot is almost double the size of the .223 from a civilian AR. ALL the ´common sense´ talking points are about CONTROL. This debate stopped being about weapons when they made full auto machine guns a special class along with sawed off shotguns. If ONE self appointed ´expert´ could tell you the difference between a ´trench´ shotgun and sawed off shotgun, I´d be amazed. If guns are the problem, ban them all and expect the failure of Chicago to spread nation wide. If you really think you are on to something with the ´assault´ gun ban, explain why shall carry laws DECREASE crime and why Chicago is a murder capital. The gun control nuts can´t refute any of it, but they double down every time. They must not know any single women or urban students or people who dare to criticize unions.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 59 - Posted by: antiquegolf, 12/19/2012 8:30:26 PM     (No. 9075255)

Incrementalism is central to the democrat game plan for their ultimate dream to disarm America. Any conservative who cites legitimate concerns about incremental confiscation of rights is dismissed with cliches, such as, "oh that´s a slippery slope arguement. No one favors any threat to the Americans right to own firearms." An "assault" weapons ban is just "common sense." When the next nut sneaks 4 semi auto sidearms with 7 capacity magazines into a school or theater and commits mass murder, liberal democrats like john lewis, schumer and carolyn mccarthy (sp?) will say "why do we need weapons with such large magazines" and seek further restrictions. Shotguns with large magazines are also on the list. After all, large magazines are not needed for hunting, right? Let´s make people show identification when they buy ammunition in the name of tracking potential threats. That doesn´t impose on Second Amendment rights, right? Ban lead ammunition in the name of environmentalism. Place heavy taxes on ammunition to be used to fund schools. Who can argue against funding for the children?

Liberal democrats won´t ever stop. They like terrorist are patient and relentless. Democrats are predictable. They shouldn´t be so predictable.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 60 - Posted by: annie xango, 12/21/2012 12:17:10 AM     (No. 9077019)

My Dad , in his day, would have called this fop a weak sister!!!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 716176




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "pineledger"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "pineledger"



Obama to Call for
Suspension of Russia From G-8
Wall Street Journal, by Carol E. Lee    Original Article
Posted By: pineledger- 3/24/2014 12:52:26 PM     Post Reply
The Hague-—President Barack Obama, seeking to shift the trajectory of the crisis in Ukraine, will press U.S. allies Monday to suspend Russia from the Group of Eight leading nations and to adopt more sweeping sanctions against the Russian economy, administration officials said. Mr. Obama will argue for those steps in an emergency meeting Monday evening with leaders of the world´s top seven economies, held on the sidelines of a nuclear security summit in The Hague, officials said. "We believe that there is no reason for the G-7 countries to engage with Russia going forward based on its behavior," Ben Rhodes,

Nudity, humor used to get youth
sign up for health care in Maine
Press Herald [Portland, ME], by Joe Lawlor    Original Article
Posted By: pineledger- 3/14/2014 5:43:35 AM     Post Reply
Advertising executives didn’t need a scientific study to surmise what would draw young adults to ads that encourage people to buy health insurance through the Affordable Care Act.They went with skin – lots of it. “He may not be naked. He could be wearing a Speedo,” Wendy Wolf said with a laugh, referring to an ad showing a young man who is otherwise unclothed but covered by a strategically placed laptop computer. “Dude, it’s time to get covered,” proclaims the ad for www.enroll207.com that ran this week in the Portland Phoenix alternative newspaper. Wolf, executive director of the Maine Health Access Foundation,

One-Fifth of New Enrollees
Under Health Care Law
Fail to Pay First Premium
New York Times, by Robert Pear    Original Article
Posted By: pineledger- 2/14/2014 5:18:09 AM     Post Reply
Washington--One in five people who signed up for health insurance under the new health care law failed to pay their premiums on time and therefore did not receive coverage in January, insurance companies and industry experts say. Paying the first month’s premium is the final step in completing an enrollment. Under federal rules, people must pay the initial premium to have coverage take effect. In view of the chaotic debut of the federal marketplace and many state exchanges, the White House urged insurers to give people more time, and many agreed to do so. But, insurers said, some people missed

‘Aid in Dying’ Movement
Takes Hold in Some States
New York Times, by Erik Eckholm    Original Article
Posted By: pineledger- 2/8/2014 5:46:05 AM     Post Reply
DENVER — Helping the terminally ill end their lives, condemned for decades as immoral, is gaining traction. Banned everywhere but Oregon until 2008, it is now legal in five states. Its advocates, who have learned to shun the term “assisted suicide,” believe that as baby boomers watch frail parents suffer, support for what they call the “aid in dying” movement will grow further. In January, the New Mexico Supreme Court authorized doctors to provide lethal prescriptions and declared a constitutional right for “a competent, terminally ill patient to choose aid in dying.” Last May, the Vermont Legislature passed a law

Health Care Law Projected to Cut the Labor Force
New York Times, by Annie Lowrey and Jonathan Weisman    Original Article
Posted By: pineledger- 2/5/2014 4:46:36 AM     Post Reply
Washinton--A Congressional Budget Office analysis released Tuesday predicted that the Affordable Care Act would shrink the work force by the equivalent of more than two million full-time positions and recharged the political debate over the health care law, providing Republican opponents fresh lines of attack and putting Democrats on the defensive. The nonpartisan budget office’s analysis, part of a regular update to its budget projections, was far more complicated than the Republican attack lines it generated. Congressional Republican leaders called the findings “devastating,” “terrible” and proof that the health care law was a job killer. (Snip)Senator Joe Manchin III, Democrat

Kerry’s Vain Quest For A
Nobel Peace Prize Drives
His Sellout Of Israel
Investor´s Business Daily, by Douglas Mackinnon    Original Article
Posted By: pineledger- 2/5/2014 4:02:05 AM     Post Reply
Secretary of State John Kerry must be really desperate to win the Nobel Peace Prize. So much so, he seems willing to continually force the state of Israel into untenable positions that put its security at risk. On this very topic last month, Israeli Minister of Defense Moshe Yaalon said Kerry "came here very determined and operates based upon an unfathomable obsession and Messianic feeling . . . "Throughout the recent months, there is no negotiation between us and the Palestinians, but rather between us and the Americans. The only thing that can ´save´ us is that John Kerry will

Holder Shakes Down ´Racist´
Banks For Nearly $1 Bil
Investor´s Business Daily, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: pineledger- 1/16/2014 6:58:11 AM     Post Reply
War On Banks: Attorney General Eric Holder has opened up a new front against car lenders and has forged an alliance with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to frame them for racism, too. We don´t use the term "frame" capriciously, certainly not like Holder uses the charge of racism. His department and the president´s new consumer credit watchdog agency, CFPB, have announced a new settlement with Ally Bank for nearly $100 million. It´s the largest fair lending deal against the auto industry and the third-largest ever to resolve charges of lending discrimination. Throw in four new mortgage-lender settlements over equally



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



´America´s royal baby´: How Chelsea´s first
child could give Hillary Clinton a boost in
the polls if she runs for president in 2016

42 replie(s)
Daily Mail (U.K.), by Jessica Jerreat    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/19/2014 7:12:10 PM     Post Reply
For Hillary Clinton, having her own baby grandchild to kiss on the campaign trail, could be one of the biggest boosts to her possible presidential election campaign. Although the former Secretary of State and First Lady has not said if she will run in 2016, the arrival of her first grandchild will soften her image, analysts have said. While Chelsea only revealed her pregnancy on Thursday, supporters of her mother have already started cooing over a possible baby in the White House. With the Clintons having a near-royal status in the U.S., the announcement of a new arrival due this fall has sent

Barack Obama and the politics of lies
36 replie(s)
Washington Examiner [DC], by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/20/2014 5:45:25 AM     Post Reply
That was quite a victory dance President Obama did Thursday while claiming Obamacare is “working” because eight million people have now supposedly signed up for the health care program. He even indulged in some less-than-subtle mockery of Republicans - and by extension the majority of Americans who have disapproved of Obamacare since before it became law. "The repeal debate is and should be over,” Obama said, taking a dig at Republicans who are “going through, you know, the stages of grief … anger and denial and all that stuff …” But a president who is viewed by most Americans as less

White House asks American parents to
monitor their children for signs of terrorism

33 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Eric Owens    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/19/2014 5:50:04 PM     Post Reply
In a speech earlier this week, Lisa O. Monaco, President Barack Obama’s assistant for homeland security and counterterrorism, insisted that American parents must be vigilant because their “confrontational” children could be on the verge of becoming terrorists. Monaco’s full, prepared text is available here. She presented the speech, entitled “Countering Violent Extremism and the Power of Community,” at Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government on April 15. Monaco began her remarks by eloquently describing the lives tragically lost last year during the Boston Marathon bombings. Interestingly, the Harvard grad failed to mention the religion or the motive of brothers Dzhokhar and Tamerlan

But Seriously, Just How
Slow-Witted is John Boehner?

30 replie(s)
American Thinker, by C. Edmund Wright    Original Article
Posted By: quantumman- 4/21/2014 7:22:21 AM     Post Reply
As he moves from lobbyists to the golf course, from press conferences to the tanning bed, he remains oblivious to all that is around him. He has power, incredible power, and yet to this day he has no understanding of the election that made it so. Moreover, all around him are astonishing opportunities for him to be an historic figure -- one who could and should be the man who did more than any other single person in turning back the red tide of Obama. It’s all there for Speaker of the House, and yet John Boehner manages to miss

Stop dressing so tacky for church
27 replie(s)
CNN, by John Blake    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/20/2014 4:40:56 AM     Post Reply
If the Rev. John DeBonville could preach a sermon to lift the souls of churchgoers across America, his message would be simple: Stop dressing so tacky for church. DeBonville has heard about the “come as you are” approach to dressing down for Sunday service, but he says the Sabbath is getting too sloppy. When he scans the pews of churches, DeBonville sees rows of people dressed in their Sunday worst. They saunter into church in baggy shorts, flip-flop sandals, tennis shoes and grubby T-shirts. Some even slide into the pews carrying coffee in plastic foam containers as if they’re going to Starbucks. “It’s like

The Growing Financial Disaster of Obamacare
22 replie(s)
Power Line, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/19/2014 5:55:20 PM     Post Reply
President Obama asserts that 8 million people have signed up for Obamacare, as though that were something to be proud of. In fact, Obamacare has always been a fiasco from a fiscal perspective–a black hole of subsidies and expanded Medicaid, with largely fictitious mechanisms in place to pay for it. As the number of subsidized participants grows, the disaster gets worse. Charles Blahous explains: Our national discussion…is missing the truly significant story here; what is unfolding before our eyes is a colossal fiscal disaster, poised to haunt legislators and taxpayers for decades to come. It is quite possible that the ACA is

John Kerry’s Easter Message:
I’m ‘First Catholic Secretary of
State in 33 Years’

22 replie(s)
Cybercast News Service, by Terence P. Jeffrey    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/21/2014 2:26:51 AM     Post Reply
In an op-ed published in the Boston Globe on Easter Sunday and posted on the State Department website, Secretary of State John Kerry recalled his days as an altar boy and pointed out that he is “the first Catholic Secretary of State in 33 years.” Alexander Haig, who served as secretary of state to President Ronald Reagan from January 1981 to July 1982, was also a Catholic. Last month, I traveled to Rome with President Obama, where I was honored to meet His Holiness Pope Francis,” said Kerry. “As an altar boy six decades ago, I never imagined that I


Post Reply   Close thread 716176





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~