A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC



        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


  Topic: Gingrich: If Hillary Clinton Runs In 2016,
Current GOP ‘Incapable Of Competing’
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Gingrich: If Hillary Clinton Runs In 2016,
Current GOP ‘Incapable Of Competing’

Mediaite, by Anjali Sareen

Original Article

Posted By:StormCnter, 12/10/2012 5:56:15 AM

Newt Gingrich told David Gregory on Sunday’s Meet The Press “the Republican party of today is incapable of competing” with a 2016 presidential run by Hillary Clinton. Gingrich thinks “every Republican” should be focused on 2016 because of the severity of their defeat in 2012. Gingrich said that if Clinton were to run in four years, “supported by Bill Clinton and presumably a still relatively popular President Barack Obama, trying to win that will be, truly, the Super Bowl.”

Comments:
Thank you, Newt. Now go away.

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: frenesi1, 12/10/2012 6:06:51 AM     (No. 9057262)

Newt is at his best when putting the press in their place...not so great at predictions.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: uno, 12/10/2012 6:07:45 AM     (No. 9057263)

Umm, just when we thought experience was important, 2008 came along. Then when we thought that zero accomplishments and the baggage of running the economy into the ground would do the trick 2012 got here.
I don´t want the Hillbag anywhere near the White House, but the fact remains that this is now a very different country and we have to learn how to re-take the office.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: geminale, 12/10/2012 6:29:36 AM     (No. 9057270)

1. I agree with Newt. 2. #3, from your lips.

I hope that either the tea party emerges as the genuine choice for Americans by the next election, or that the GOP gets a thorough housecleaning of all the progressive plants and democrat wannabes.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: chumley, 12/10/2012 6:43:27 AM     (No. 9057275)

Not a tough call. If Karl Marx runs in 2016 the GOP cant compete.
They proved it in 2012.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: steveW, 12/10/2012 6:44:39 AM     (No. 9057278)

Silliness. Most of Obama´s female vote comes from women who are, uh, "excited" in the nether parts by His Majesty (bad boy syndrome, perhaps). I´d bet that percentage is at least 96%. Hillary´s visage, on the other hand, repels red-blooded males like a tsunami of pepper spray. The only men who´d possibly vote for that walking insult to feminine charm are men who, uh, aren´t men.

No threat in 2016. The GOP will be incapable of competing only if it keeps caving in to the Obamas and Clintons of the world.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: pickle1, 12/10/2012 6:45:42 AM     (No. 9057281)

She and Obummer will be in jail awaiting their trials for murder and treason.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: snapper451, 12/10/2012 6:48:15 AM     (No. 9057283)

Newt, of whom the Clinton machine made mincemeat of during their day. It looks like they still scare him to death. Our first enemy is the MSM in this country that covered our primaries in the most negative fashion and then did 90% + negative stories on Romney. Add to that the massive voter fraud in this country and you have not even touched a real conservative issue, The country is dying or dead due to people who are God-less and worship "things" like Obama and Obamacare, welfare, etc. This is where we start.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: provide, 12/10/2012 7:02:20 AM     (No. 9057287)

She´ll have to beat Mrs. Greenjeans in the primary.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: GringoinQuito, 12/10/2012 7:12:58 AM     (No. 9057293)

I don´t think she will run. They might not want to rehash the Whitewater controversy or the missing files.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: bpl40, 12/10/2012 7:13:45 AM     (No. 9057296)

There is a proof of the pudding coming before 2016. It is the 2014 elections. Will they be a repeat of 2010 or 2012? That will give the answer to the real question Newt has raised.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: Judith, 12/10/2012 7:27:13 AM     (No. 9057307)

Let´s see. In 2008 the gop ran a candidate with a questionable history of where he was born, against obama. In 2012 the gop ran a candidate who had signed (not authored)romneycare against obamacare obama.
You mean to tell me that somewhere in the ranks of the gop stable, they can´t find a skank who ONLY does the bidding of powerful men? I´m sure they will find the perfect candidate.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    6 persons like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: beca, 12/10/2012 7:42:11 AM     (No. 9057321)

hey newt...shut up......2016 is a lifetime in politics.....

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: leopardtwo, 12/10/2012 7:47:19 AM     (No. 9057328)

So, if a habitual liar ran for President in 2016 and was supported by a perjurer and another habitual liar, then she would win the White House?
God help us.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: SpencersMom, 12/10/2012 7:54:33 AM     (No. 9057337)

In our brain dead hip society, by 2016 half of the people of voting age will not remember the Clinton years. I doubt Bill Clinton who will be around 70 will make any 20 somethings swoon and Hillary will also be around 70. I doubt there is a makeover anywhere that could make the hag look even remotely attractive.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: Blue-Z-Anna, 12/10/2012 8:00:30 AM     (No. 9057348)

I´m no expert on Sharia Law but will we still get to vote ?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: Jebediah, 12/10/2012 8:01:30 AM     (No. 9057349)

And considering what a disaster the woman has been as secretary of state, and not JUST with Benghazi burt all round, this speaks volumes about the American electorate, who seem to swallow anything without thought.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: kahunavol, 12/10/2012 8:01:38 AM     (No. 9057350)

It appears that the Pubbies have learned absolutely nothing from losing twice to Obama, except blame the electorate so, yeah, he´s got an excellent chance of being right on this prediction.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Jebediah, 12/10/2012 8:05:26 AM     (No. 9057357)

As to poster #6, Romney won the male voter....it was the young ´ens and the free birth control and the Hispanics and Asians that lost the race, and nothing is being done to either court or educate them....at least without destroying all our ethics and principles. (Forget the Blacks--they largely seem to knee jerk to another 1/2 Black no matter WHAT he does, and that goes for Colin Powell as well.)

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: adguy47, 12/10/2012 8:06:36 AM     (No. 9057359)

Can´t stand Newt but this time, for the first time in years, he´s correct. The sooner the party´s leaders get together and cobble together a platform that reflects we are living in the 21st century and tells those who don´t agree to form their own theocratic party, the better. Otherwise it´s doomed.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 20 - Posted by: birmingham, 12/10/2012 8:41:28 AM     (No. 9057417)

Unfortunately for my optimism levels, I have the same dreadful feeling that Hillary will be our next president. Makes me throw up in my mouth. The GOP is so weak that Boehner is getting ready to give Obama what he wants with higher tax rates. The idiot public will only see that the Annointed One runs the country without any help from Congress once again and be thrilled. Won´t matter what Boehner gets in return...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: dolphin, 12/10/2012 8:41:49 AM     (No. 9057418)

The left began shredding Sarah Palin the day after she lost the 2008 election. They were successful. We should learn from them. The best defense is a good offense. The worst defense is to give up four years early.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 22 - Posted by: AltaD, 12/10/2012 8:49:08 AM     (No. 9057424)

How does he know who will emerge for the GOP over the next 4 years? In 2004 did he predict that obama would win in ´08?

I´m really tired of hearing from doom and gloom "conservative" talking heads. They sound like Winnie the Pooh´s pal Eeyore, not very inspiring.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: jackie, 12/10/2012 8:55:33 AM     (No. 9057437)

Unless the States get in gear and purge the voter list of dead and illegals and pass voter ID NOW... we will loose. They know the Liberal election stealing is coming but still they scratch themselves until about 2 months before the election then decide maybe they should look into it... Too busy enjoying their power until they are about to loose it..

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 24 - Posted by: TheMotherCO, 12/10/2012 9:00:15 AM     (No. 9057445)

I do not pretend to know who will run next election for the prez - I do know that Newt is a sleazebag that I do not want to listen to or see. I would have trusted Mitt with my life and the country´s health. The Republican party needs to have people voting despite their like or dislike of the candidate. The country cannot stand much more of the dim rule and spending. Even if it meant voting for newt - not even he would destroy us.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 25 - Posted by: birmingham, 12/10/2012 9:00:16 AM     (No. 9057446)

I totally agree except that Dems play dirty so win, while Repubs cave every chance they get so they can be "liked" too. W fell prey to that syndrome in his second term and was giving entitlements away in a failed attempt to get some appreciation from the lefties. How many times do you see his great work for AIDs victims be mentioned? Ask a Dem who gave them prescrition coverage to see how well that worked out. Ask a Dem who voted for civil rights legislation. Only thing they know is that JFK sent the Guard in to integrate the school that the Dem governor was blocking, so voila! A Dem president integrated schools!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 26 - Posted by: 4freedom, 12/10/2012 9:07:11 AM     (No. 9057455)

This talk about Hillary won´t matter, after skippy gets the 22nd amendment scrubbed, he´ll get another close but landslide victory.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 27 - Posted by: realrep, 12/10/2012 9:32:22 AM     (No. 9057496)

I think PIAPS wants a power job at the UN. It will be a position for life. No elections. Little accountability. She and her kind can quietly take over world systems without much fanfare.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 28 - Posted by: Hobbiest, 12/10/2012 9:33:25 AM     (No. 9057499)

The GOP proved incapable of competeing in 2012 and so far I don´t see much sign that people have learned much from the lesson.

Personally I think that all those who were gung ho for Romney are the ones who need to go away. Not only were all their predictions wrong, they ares till blind as to why that was so.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 29 - Posted by: ScarletPimpernel, 12/10/2012 10:10:23 AM     (No. 9057565)

Newt is right. The GOP is currently incapable of competing. Why would we expect them to be able to do any better in 2016?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 30 - Posted by: msjena, 12/10/2012 10:18:09 AM     (No. 9057585)

Shut up, Newt. If Newt, who left the House of Representatives in disgrace, is the new spokesman for conservatives, count me out.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 31 - Posted by: janjan, 12/10/2012 10:23:40 AM     (No. 9057598)

#23 - I agree.
#33 - some of us still care and do not intend to let the liberals do exactly what Obama is trying hard to do - which is to demoralize the conservatives in this country to the point where we have been effectively shut up and will no longer vote.

We have about 2 years before the next crop of GOP contenders start getting serious. Hope it´s Rubio.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 32 - Posted by: jdf, 12/10/2012 10:24:12 AM     (No. 9057600)

I was rather hoping Newt would go away, along with Dick Morris.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 33 - Posted by: Rubinski, 12/10/2012 10:38:16 AM     (No. 9057636)

Barring devine intervention, by 2016, we will be Zimbabwe, and they´ll be so many uninformed irresponsible voters we wont have a chance.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 34 - Posted by: Erastus, 12/10/2012 10:45:56 AM     (No. 9057649)

Hillary in four years? Just for today she has a virus and certain viruses, untreated, become chronic and progressive resulting in an inability to run.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 35 - Posted by: thatsomewhereplace, 12/10/2012 10:48:27 AM     (No. 9057652)

Newty is right!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 36 - Posted by: toodles3956, 12/10/2012 10:53:51 AM     (No. 9057658)

Wonder how Hillary would look in a burka? She´ll need one by then.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 37 - Posted by: tisHimself, 12/10/2012 10:59:42 AM     (No. 9057665)

I´m sure the establishment palace guard can find us another severely conservative Rockfeller republican that can come within one hundred electoral votes of her.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 38 - Posted by: KTWO, 12/10/2012 11:07:32 AM     (No. 9057681)

IMO Hillary won´t run. And ditto #13.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 39 - Posted by: ramona, 12/10/2012 11:14:15 AM     (No. 9057695)

GOP & Sycophants to the base: "Conservatives not welcome here. Leave us alone to burn the Constitution."
Ramona (the Pest_

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 40 - Posted by: NOBS, 12/10/2012 11:37:15 AM     (No. 9057731)

#33UPCHUCK-if you are inclined I too live in Roswell-maybe the Lucianne web site can get us to communicate. Annette

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 41 - Posted by: whyyeseyec, 12/10/2012 11:41:27 AM     (No. 9057744)

If the GOP is unable to compete in 2016 then most likely they can not compete in 2014 either. We might be seeing Speaker Pelosi again along with billions in `stimulus` an every other crazy piece of leftist legislation they couldn`t push through in the 111th Congress.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 42 - Posted by: doctorfixit, 12/10/2012 12:19:37 PM     (No. 9057798)

The GOP is finished at the national level through a combination of illegal immigration, demographics, and Free Stuff. The Presidency should be written off, let the establishment run their RINOs, and concentrate on efforts to promote de facto secession through governors refusing federal directives. The Supreme Court doesn´t have an army, and federal judges should simply be ignored.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 43 - Posted by: plumnellie, 12/10/2012 1:31:42 PM     (No. 9057925)

Newt was corrupt morally. He had no way of winning against Clinton. This holds true of Justice Roberts, who must have a huge secret. Anytime Obama takes on one of the Repubs you can be sure he has the dirt. I had hoped Romney´s clean character would prevail but he lacked one thing: guts and passion. He had ambition and integrity and know how...but so what if you can´t out gun your enemy.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 44 - Posted by: DocH, 12/10/2012 3:22:01 PM     (No. 9058129)

For some reason I am reminded of that Geico commercial with the witch in the broom factory, where she takes a broom from a worker, and he says, ´´I´m gonna stand up to her,´´ and his coworker says, ´´No you won´t.´´

That´s the GOP and Hillary. No guts.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 45 - Posted by: mercedesops, 12/10/2012 11:29:37 PM     (No. 9058773)

She will be 68 years old and won´t be able to raise the money she needs. Plus she will have to run against Biden and the failed Obama record.She is not a lock.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 715054




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"



New grand jury expected to be seated
in Gov. Rick Perry´s ethics case
Associated Press, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 1:18:20 PM     Post Reply
AUSTIN — A Texas judge was expected to seat a grand jury Monday in an investigation into whether Gov. Rick Perry abused his power by vetoing funding for public corruption prosecutors last year. Special State District Judge Bert Richardson was to oversee the impaneling in Austin. The governor’s office didn’t return messages seeking comment, but The Austin-American Statesman and KVUE-TV reported that Perry took the unusual step of hiring a criminal defense attorney to represent him. The attorney, David Botsford, did not return calls from The Associated Press seeking comment. In June, the governor threatened to veto funding approved by the Texas Legislature

A Pitiful Pulitzer Pick
Commentary Magazine, by Max Boot    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 12:34:31 PM     Post Reply
The Pulitzer Prize board has just managed to do the impossible. It has awarded a prize that deserves to be spoken of in the same conversation with its risible 1932 award to the New York Times correspondent Walter Duranty for articles whitewashing the evils of Stalinist Russia. The award of the Public Service prize to the Washington Post and the Guardian for serving as a mouthpiece for Edward Snowden is an attempt by the journalistic establishment to put its stamp of approval on the actions of one of the most destructive traitors in U.S. history—a former NSA contractor who has done

Texan, 23, Headed To State Prison
For Urinating On The Alamo
Smoking Gun, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 12:27:47 PM     Post Reply
A Texas man was sentenced yesterday to 18 months in state prison for urinating on the Alamo. Daniel Athens, a 23-year-old El Paso resident, pleaded guilty earlier this year to a criminal mischief charge in connection with the April 2012 incident at the Texas shrine. While Athens could have faced a maximum of two years in custody, a plea deal saved him up to six months in custody. Athens was also ordered to pay $4000 in restitution by District Judge Ray Olivarri. Since Athens is not eligible for parole, he will have to serve the entirety of his 18-month sentence. As detailed

Rand Paul for President
Wall Street Journal, by Bret Stephens    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 9:25:40 AM     Post Reply
Republicans, let´s get it over with. Fast forward to the finish line. Avoid the long and winding primary road. It can only weaken the nominee. And we know who he—yes, he—has to be. Not Jeb Bush, who plainly is unsuited to be president. He is insufficiently hostile to Mexicans. He holds heretical views on the Common Core, which, as we well know, is the defining issue of our time. And he´s a Bush. Another installment of a political dynasty just isn´t going to fly with the American people, who want some fresh blood in their politics. Unless the dynasty is

Progressive Puritans
Reason Magazine, by Matt Welch    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 5:42:20 AM     Post Reply
When I first started hearing people on the political left describe themselves with some frequency as progressive back in the 1990s, the term did not seem tethered to the epoch-defining, early-20th-century spasm of moral crusading and government centralization that helped give us everything from trust busting to Prohibition to the Federal Reserve. As articulated by champions like Ralph Nader and Molly Ivins, the progressive label was both a way to get out from under the generation-old baggage of liberal-a term Ronald Reagan and others had turned into an epithet-and to differentiate lefties from seemingly apologetic triangulators like Bill Clinton and

Eleven Days to November
Politico Magazine, by Larry Sabato    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 5:39:40 AM     Post Reply
For political junkies desperate for clues to the hottest House, Senate and governors’ races around the country, April is the cruelest month. While Illinois and Texas primaries were held last month, the 48 remaining state contests don’t start up again for three weeks. Here’s the good news for those of us hoping to determine whether Democrats or Republicans will be celebrating in the fall: From early May to early September, we’ll have a steady stream of conventions, primaries and runoffs to keep us busy. We’ve already learned a little from the first two contests. On March 4, Texas told us two contradictory

Ben Carson: White House wanted
apology for ‘offending’ Obama
Daily Caller, by Alex Pappas    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 5:22:51 AM     Post Reply
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson says the White House wanted him to apologize for “offending” President Obama after he famously delivered a conservative message at the National Prayer Breakfast last year. Carson, the former director of pediatric neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins Hospital, recalls the events surrounding his 2013 speech in his new book, One Nation: What We Can All Do To Save America’s Future. The Daily Caller obtained an advance copy of the book, which is set for release May 20. “He did not appear to be hostile or angry,” Carson writes of Obama, “but within a matter of minutes after the conclusion of



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Ben Carson: White House wanted
apology for ‘offending’ Obama

53 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Alex Pappas    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 5:22:51 AM     Post Reply
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson says the White House wanted him to apologize for “offending” President Obama after he famously delivered a conservative message at the National Prayer Breakfast last year. Carson, the former director of pediatric neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins Hospital, recalls the events surrounding his 2013 speech in his new book, One Nation: What We Can All Do To Save America’s Future. The Daily Caller obtained an advance copy of the book, which is set for release May 20. “He did not appear to be hostile or angry,” Carson writes of Obama, “but within a matter of minutes after the conclusion of

Obama Generation Losing
Interest in Obama

45 replie(s)
Wall Street Journal, by James Freeman    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/14/2014 4:23:09 PM     Post Reply
President Obama inspired a generation of young people to support his historic election in 2008. And in 2012, despite the struggles of his first term, Mr. Obama still managed to win the support of a full 60% of voters age 18-29. But the man who once dreamed of being a transformative leader in the Reagan mold is inspiring few of those young people to follow his lead. "For all the talk about the movement that elected Mr. Obama, the more notable movement of Obama supporters has been away from politics. It appears that few of the young people who voted

Why You Should Be Sympathetic
Toward Cliven Bundy

44 replie(s)
Powerline, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Toledo- 4/15/2014 8:40:58 AM     Post Reply
On Saturday, I wrote about the standoff at Bundy Ranch. That post drew a remarkable amount of traffic, even though, as I wrote then, I had not quite decided what to make of the story. Since then, I have continued to study the facts and have drawn some conclusions. Here they are. First, it must be admitted that legally, Bundy doesn’t have a leg to stand on. The Bureau of Land Management has been charging him grazing fees since the early 1990s, which he has refused to pay. Further, BLM has issued orders limiting the area on which Bundy’s cows can

Chelsea Clinton no longer
ruling out politics

35 replie(s)
The Hill (Washington DC), by Judy Katz    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/14/2014 11:57:36 AM     Post Reply
Chelsea Clinton says when people ask her these days whether she wants to go into politics, her answer isn’t an automatic “no.” The 34-year-old former first daughter told Fast Company in an interview published Monday, “for so long the answer was just a visceral no. Not because I had made any conscientious, deliberate decision, but since people had been asking for as long as literally I could remember, it was no." Now, the only child of former President Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton explains, "I live in a city and a state and a country where I

Glaring limits of the Civil Rights
Act: We need to redistribute wealth

34 replie(s)
Salon Magazine, by Matt Bruenig    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/14/2014 7:20:41 PM     Post Reply
Although the Civil Rights Act, the landmark legislation which just reached its 50th anniversary, made great strides in desegregating the economy, economic discrimination is still widespread, and anti-discrimination legislation alone can never rectify the economic damage inflicted upon blacks by slavery and our Jim Crow apartheid regime. The Civil Rights Act was a mild reform, all things considered, but one conservatives fought with vigor and one many conservatives are still bitter about to this day. When the Civil Rights Act passed in 1964, the primary purpose was to root out discrimination in public accommodations (like hotels and movie theaters)

Megyn Kelly and the
Sandberg Head Shaker

31 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Richard F. Miniter    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/15/2014 9:16:05 AM     Post Reply
Megyn Kelly’s "Kelly File" is a great news show. She’s incisive, informed and customarily handles the toughest guest with aplomb. But her lengthy interview of Facebook C.O.O. Sheryl Sandberg about her second book in the Lean In series Lean In: For Graduates was a head shaker. Amazing that she of all people allowed Sandberg to restring the same old, same old, shamed, and shopworn feminist myths about women and girls and then jangle it in front of her viewing audience like something new out of the box. Indeed Kelly all but genuflected in front of this woman. Kept her on thru

White is not right: Campus admins ask
for help weeding out white people

31 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Robby Soave    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/15/2014 7:47:18 PM     Post Reply
Western Washington University sent a questionnaire to students asking them for advice on how the administration could succeed at making sure that in future years, “we are not as white as we are today.” The question notes that WWU’s racial make up does not perfectly reflect the nation at large, and asks students to consider strategies that other universities have used to focus on skin color as the paramount indicator of a student-applicant’s worth. The president of WWU has stated that his explicit goal is to reduce the white population on campus, according to Campus Reform. “I’ve said before and I’ll say it


Post Reply   Close thread 715054





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~