|
|
| |
Topic: Gingrich: If Hillary Clinton Runs In 2016, Current GOP ‘Incapable Of Competing’ |
Gingrich: If Hillary Clinton Runs In 2016, Current GOP ‘Incapable Of Competing’
Mediaite, by Anjali Sareen
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:StormCnter, 12/10/2012 5:56:15 AM
|
| Newt Gingrich told David Gregory on Sunday’s Meet The Press “the Republican party of today is incapable of competing” with a 2016 presidential run by Hillary Clinton. Gingrich thinks “every Republican” should be focused on 2016 because of the severity of their defeat in 2012. Gingrich said that if Clinton were to run in four years, “supported by Bill Clinton and presumably a still relatively popular President Barack Obama, trying to win that will be, truly, the Super Bowl.”
|
Comments: Thank you, Newt. Now go away.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
frenesi1, 12/10/2012 6:06:51 AM (No. 9057262)
Newt is at his best when putting the press in their place...not so great at predictions.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
uno, 12/10/2012 6:07:45 AM (No. 9057263)
Umm, just when we thought experience was important, 2008 came along. Then when we thought that zero accomplishments and the baggage of running the economy into the ground would do the trick 2012 got here. I don´t want the Hillbag anywhere near the White House, but the fact remains that this is now a very different country and we have to learn how to re-take the office.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
srhcb, 12/10/2012 6:22:47 AM (No. 9057268)
So what?
"The Republican party of today" will not exist in 2016.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
geminale, 12/10/2012 6:29:36 AM (No. 9057270)
1. I agree with Newt. 2. #3, from your lips.
I hope that either the tea party emerges as the genuine choice for Americans by the next election, or that the GOP gets a thorough housecleaning of all the progressive plants and democrat wannabes.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
chumley, 12/10/2012 6:43:27 AM (No. 9057275)
Not a tough call. If Karl Marx runs in 2016 the GOP cant compete. They proved it in 2012.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
steveW, 12/10/2012 6:44:39 AM (No. 9057278)
Silliness. Most of Obama´s female vote comes from women who are, uh, "excited" in the nether parts by His Majesty (bad boy syndrome, perhaps). I´d bet that percentage is at least 96%. Hillary´s visage, on the other hand, repels red-blooded males like a tsunami of pepper spray. The only men who´d possibly vote for that walking insult to feminine charm are men who, uh, aren´t men.
No threat in 2016. The GOP will be incapable of competing only if it keeps caving in to the Obamas and Clintons of the world.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
pickle1, 12/10/2012 6:45:42 AM (No. 9057281)
She and Obummer will be in jail awaiting their trials for murder and treason.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
snapper451, 12/10/2012 6:48:15 AM (No. 9057283)
Newt, of whom the Clinton machine made mincemeat of during their day. It looks like they still scare him to death. Our first enemy is the MSM in this country that covered our primaries in the most negative fashion and then did 90% + negative stories on Romney. Add to that the massive voter fraud in this country and you have not even touched a real conservative issue, The country is dying or dead due to people who are God-less and worship "things" like Obama and Obamacare, welfare, etc. This is where we start.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
provide, 12/10/2012 7:02:20 AM (No. 9057287)
She´ll have to beat Mrs. Greenjeans in the primary.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
GringoinQuito, 12/10/2012 7:12:58 AM (No. 9057293)
I don´t think she will run. They might not want to rehash the Whitewater controversy or the missing files.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
bpl40, 12/10/2012 7:13:45 AM (No. 9057296)
There is a proof of the pudding coming before 2016. It is the 2014 elections. Will they be a repeat of 2010 or 2012? That will give the answer to the real question Newt has raised.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Judith, 12/10/2012 7:27:13 AM (No. 9057307)
Let´s see. In 2008 the gop ran a candidate with a questionable history of where he was born, against obama. In 2012 the gop ran a candidate who had signed (not authored)romneycare against obamacare obama. You mean to tell me that somewhere in the ranks of the gop stable, they can´t find a skank who ONLY does the bidding of powerful men? I´m sure they will find the perfect candidate.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
beca, 12/10/2012 7:42:11 AM (No. 9057321)
hey newt...shut up......2016 is a lifetime in politics.....
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
leopardtwo, 12/10/2012 7:47:19 AM (No. 9057328)
So, if a habitual liar ran for President in 2016 and was supported by a perjurer and another habitual liar, then she would win the White House? God help us.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
SpencersMom, 12/10/2012 7:54:33 AM (No. 9057337)
In our brain dead hip society, by 2016 half of the people of voting age will not remember the Clinton years. I doubt Bill Clinton who will be around 70 will make any 20 somethings swoon and Hillary will also be around 70. I doubt there is a makeover anywhere that could make the hag look even remotely attractive.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Blue-Z-Anna, 12/10/2012 8:00:30 AM (No. 9057348)
I´m no expert on Sharia Law but will we still get to vote ?
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Jebediah, 12/10/2012 8:01:30 AM (No. 9057349)
And considering what a disaster the woman has been as secretary of state, and not JUST with Benghazi burt all round, this speaks volumes about the American electorate, who seem to swallow anything without thought.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
kahunavol, 12/10/2012 8:01:38 AM (No. 9057350)
It appears that the Pubbies have learned absolutely nothing from losing twice to Obama, except blame the electorate so, yeah, he´s got an excellent chance of being right on this prediction.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Jebediah, 12/10/2012 8:05:26 AM (No. 9057357)
As to poster #6, Romney won the male voter....it was the young ´ens and the free birth control and the Hispanics and Asians that lost the race, and nothing is being done to either court or educate them....at least without destroying all our ethics and principles. (Forget the Blacks--they largely seem to knee jerk to another 1/2 Black no matter WHAT he does, and that goes for Colin Powell as well.)
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
adguy47, 12/10/2012 8:06:36 AM (No. 9057359)
Can´t stand Newt but this time, for the first time in years, he´s correct. The sooner the party´s leaders get together and cobble together a platform that reflects we are living in the 21st century and tells those who don´t agree to form their own theocratic party, the better. Otherwise it´s doomed.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
birmingham, 12/10/2012 8:41:28 AM (No. 9057417)
Unfortunately for my optimism levels, I have the same dreadful feeling that Hillary will be our next president. Makes me throw up in my mouth. The GOP is so weak that Boehner is getting ready to give Obama what he wants with higher tax rates. The idiot public will only see that the Annointed One runs the country without any help from Congress once again and be thrilled. Won´t matter what Boehner gets in return...
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
dolphin, 12/10/2012 8:41:49 AM (No. 9057418)
The left began shredding Sarah Palin the day after she lost the 2008 election. They were successful. We should learn from them. The best defense is a good offense. The worst defense is to give up four years early.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
AltaD, 12/10/2012 8:49:08 AM (No. 9057424)
How does he know who will emerge for the GOP over the next 4 years? In 2004 did he predict that obama would win in ´08?
I´m really tired of hearing from doom and gloom "conservative" talking heads. They sound like Winnie the Pooh´s pal Eeyore, not very inspiring.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
jackie, 12/10/2012 8:55:33 AM (No. 9057437)
Unless the States get in gear and purge the voter list of dead and illegals and pass voter ID NOW... we will loose. They know the Liberal election stealing is coming but still they scratch themselves until about 2 months before the election then decide maybe they should look into it... Too busy enjoying their power until they are about to loose it..
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
TheMotherCO, 12/10/2012 9:00:15 AM (No. 9057445)
I do not pretend to know who will run next election for the prez - I do know that Newt is a sleazebag that I do not want to listen to or see. I would have trusted Mitt with my life and the country´s health. The Republican party needs to have people voting despite their like or dislike of the candidate. The country cannot stand much more of the dim rule and spending. Even if it meant voting for newt - not even he would destroy us.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
birmingham, 12/10/2012 9:00:16 AM (No. 9057446)
I totally agree except that Dems play dirty so win, while Repubs cave every chance they get so they can be "liked" too. W fell prey to that syndrome in his second term and was giving entitlements away in a failed attempt to get some appreciation from the lefties. How many times do you see his great work for AIDs victims be mentioned? Ask a Dem who gave them prescrition coverage to see how well that worked out. Ask a Dem who voted for civil rights legislation. Only thing they know is that JFK sent the Guard in to integrate the school that the Dem governor was blocking, so voila! A Dem president integrated schools!
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
4freedom, 12/10/2012 9:07:11 AM (No. 9057455)
This talk about Hillary won´t matter, after skippy gets the 22nd amendment scrubbed, he´ll get another close but landslide victory.
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
realrep, 12/10/2012 9:32:22 AM (No. 9057496)
I think PIAPS wants a power job at the UN. It will be a position for life. No elections. Little accountability. She and her kind can quietly take over world systems without much fanfare.
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
Hobbiest, 12/10/2012 9:33:25 AM (No. 9057499)
The GOP proved incapable of competeing in 2012 and so far I don´t see much sign that people have learned much from the lesson.
Personally I think that all those who were gung ho for Romney are the ones who need to go away. Not only were all their predictions wrong, they ares till blind as to why that was so.
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
sickened, 12/10/2012 9:48:22 AM (No. 9057517)
I think Newt underestimates the appeal of youth. A haggard Hillary is unlikely to win against an opponent in their 40´s or early 50´s, as long as they are not obese (e.g. Gingrich).
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
ScarletPimpernel, 12/10/2012 10:10:23 AM (No. 9057565)
Newt is right. The GOP is currently incapable of competing. Why would we expect them to be able to do any better in 2016?
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
msjena, 12/10/2012 10:18:09 AM (No. 9057585)
Shut up, Newt. If Newt, who left the House of Representatives in disgrace, is the new spokesman for conservatives, count me out.
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
janjan, 12/10/2012 10:23:40 AM (No. 9057598)
#23 - I agree. #33 - some of us still care and do not intend to let the liberals do exactly what Obama is trying hard to do - which is to demoralize the conservatives in this country to the point where we have been effectively shut up and will no longer vote.
We have about 2 years before the next crop of GOP contenders start getting serious. Hope it´s Rubio.
|
Reply 34 - Posted by:
jdf, 12/10/2012 10:24:12 AM (No. 9057600)
I was rather hoping Newt would go away, along with Dick Morris.
|
Reply 35 - Posted by:
Rubinski, 12/10/2012 10:38:16 AM (No. 9057636)
Barring devine intervention, by 2016, we will be Zimbabwe, and they´ll be so many uninformed irresponsible voters we wont have a chance.
|
Reply 36 - Posted by:
Erastus, 12/10/2012 10:45:56 AM (No. 9057649)
Hillary in four years? Just for today she has a virus and certain viruses, untreated, become chronic and progressive resulting in an inability to run.
|
Reply 37 - Posted by:
thatsomewhereplace, 12/10/2012 10:48:27 AM (No. 9057652)
Newty is right!
|
Reply 38 - Posted by:
toodles3956, 12/10/2012 10:53:51 AM (No. 9057658)
Wonder how Hillary would look in a burka? She´ll need one by then.
|
Reply 39 - Posted by:
tisHimself, 12/10/2012 10:59:42 AM (No. 9057665)
I´m sure the establishment palace guard can find us another severely conservative Rockfeller republican that can come within one hundred electoral votes of her.
|
Reply 40 - Posted by:
KTWO, 12/10/2012 11:07:32 AM (No. 9057681)
IMO Hillary won´t run. And ditto #13.
|
Reply 41 - Posted by:
ramona, 12/10/2012 11:14:15 AM (No. 9057695)
GOP & Sycophants to the base: "Conservatives not welcome here. Leave us alone to burn the Constitution." Ramona (the Pest_
|
Reply 42 - Posted by:
NOBS, 12/10/2012 11:37:15 AM (No. 9057731)
#33UPCHUCK-if you are inclined I too live in Roswell-maybe the Lucianne web site can get us to communicate. Annette
|
Reply 43 - Posted by:
whyyeseyec, 12/10/2012 11:41:27 AM (No. 9057744)
If the GOP is unable to compete in 2016 then most likely they can not compete in 2014 either. We might be seeing Speaker Pelosi again along with billions in `stimulus` an every other crazy piece of leftist legislation they couldn`t push through in the 111th Congress.
|
Reply 44 - Posted by:
doctorfixit, 12/10/2012 12:19:37 PM (No. 9057798)
The GOP is finished at the national level through a combination of illegal immigration, demographics, and Free Stuff. The Presidency should be written off, let the establishment run their RINOs, and concentrate on efforts to promote de facto secession through governors refusing federal directives. The Supreme Court doesn´t have an army, and federal judges should simply be ignored.
|
Reply 45 - Posted by:
plumnellie, 12/10/2012 1:31:42 PM (No. 9057925)
Newt was corrupt morally. He had no way of winning against Clinton. This holds true of Justice Roberts, who must have a huge secret. Anytime Obama takes on one of the Repubs you can be sure he has the dirt. I had hoped Romney´s clean character would prevail but he lacked one thing: guts and passion. He had ambition and integrity and know how...but so what if you can´t out gun your enemy.
|
Reply 46 - Posted by:
DocH, 12/10/2012 3:22:01 PM (No. 9058129)
For some reason I am reminded of that Geico commercial with the witch in the broom factory, where she takes a broom from a worker, and he says, ´´I´m gonna stand up to her,´´ and his coworker says, ´´No you won´t.´´
That´s the GOP and Hillary. No guts.
|
Reply 47 - Posted by:
mercedesops, 12/10/2012 11:29:37 PM (No. 9058773)
She will be 68 years old and won´t be able to raise the money she needs. Plus she will have to run against Biden and the failed Obama record.She is not a lock.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"
|
|
The Democrats´ lost decade?
|
|
Politico, by Alex Isenstadt
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 6/19/2013 3:36:06 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Democrats fell far short of winning the House in 2012, an otherwise banner year for the party, and many are privately glum about taking back the chamber in 2014. But that grim immediate outlook raises a far more troubling longer-term prospect for Democrats: that the newly drawn congressional lines have tilted the electoral playing field so decisively in the GOP’s favor that the party could control the House through 2020. That this, in other words, could be the Democrats’ Lost Decade. Three of the past four elections have produced partisan upheaval, so political forecasting must be approached with caution.
|
Men´s Wearhouse ousts founder George Zimmer
|
|
USA Today, by Gary Strauss
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 6/19/2013 11:47:03 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Men´s Wearhouse no longer likes the way George Zimmer looks. Zimmer, the founder, chairman and the public face of the discount apparel chain, has been terminated by the company, according to a brief statement from the company. Men´s Wearhouse gave no reason for Zimmer´s departure -- which surfaced on Wednesday, just hours before the company postponed its annual shareholders meeting. A company spokesman declined comment but said Zimmer´s departure would not affect operations.
|
Obama Took Three Years to Find Nominees for Civil Liberties Board
|
|
National Review Online, by Jim Geraghty
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 6/19/2013 6:21:26 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Obama to Charlie Rose, yesterday: I’ve stood up a privacy and civil liberties oversight board made up of independent citizens, including some fierce civil libertarians. I’ll be meeting with them and what I want to do is to set up and structure a national conversation not only about these two programs but also about the general problem of these big data sets because this is not going to be restricted to government entities. The board Obama is referring to was created in 2004. Nominations and confirmation delays prevented the board from being particularly effective,
|
|
Barack’s Brave New World Blarney
|
|
American Spectator, by George Neumayr
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 6/19/2013 6:14:17 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Obama never fails to enlist children in his secularist crusades, whether at home or abroad. Last week he trotted out two nine-year-old girls to introduce him at a White House event celebrating “LGBT Pride Month.” “We could not be prouder of Zea and Luna for the introduction,” he said. “Zea and Luna are here with their moms, and also I think with Grandma and Grandpa — correct? And so feel free to congratulate them afterwards for their outstanding introduction.” Zea and Luna proved useful to Obama not only as props for LGBT rights but also as mouthpieces for his gun-control agenda:
|
GOP staffer claims to live on food stamps without problems, suggests cutting more
|
|
Daily Caller, by Caroline May
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 6/19/2013 6:06:37 AM
Post Reply
|
|
With dozens of Democratic lawmakers struggling to live on a food stamp budget to protest GOP cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, a Republican staffer says he is living on a SNAP budget without problems. Texas Republican Rep. Steve Stockman’s communications director and agriculture policy advisor, Donny Ferguson, says he has been able to eat well on $27.58 for a week, less than the $31.50 House Democrats have limited themselves to for their “SNAP Challenge.” “I wanted to personally experience the effects of the proposed cuts to food stamps. I didn’t plan ahead or buy strategically,
|
|
The “Apolitical” Fantasy and the IRS
|
|
Commentary Magazine, by Seth Mandel
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 6/19/2013 5:56:47 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The ongoing saga of Edward Snowden has at least been moving in the right direction for President Obama. Snowden may once have tried to position himself as a whistleblower, but he has since devolved into ingratiating himself with authoritarian regimes by plying them with American national security secrets. While Pete is correct that the NSA story seems to be hurting voters’ opinion of Obama’s trustworthiness, Americans are by now realizing that they would be foolish to go the other extreme and place that trust in Snowden. It is also (understandably) distracting the public’s attention from the scandals that preceded it,
|
|
‘Pretty please’ foreign policy
|
|
Washington Post, by Jennifer Rubin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 6/19/2013 5:46:48 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In two contexts the Obama administration has revealed its complete confusion about high-stakes negotiations and the interrelation of soft and hard power. In Syria, after dragging his feet for two years, trying to fudge over his own “red line” and coming up with a half-hearted move to give small arms to the rebels, President Obama discovers that he can’t budge Russia, which has backed Bashar al-Assad to the hilt. The Post reports that at the Group of 8 summit: Obama has demanded that Assad relinquish power as part of any negotiated peace settlement, a condition Putin rejects.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
TWA Flight 800 investigators break silence in new documentary, claim original conclusion about cause of crash is wrong
|
|
FOX News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: smcchk- 6/19/2013 12:41:02 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A group of whistleblowers, including a number of aviation experts, have come forward in a new documentary to claim that the official explanation for the crash of TWA Flight 800 was wrong and a gas tank explosion did not bring down the flight off the coast of Long Island 17 years ago. However, the six whistleblowers, all part of the original investigation team, stopped short of saying the plane was shot down. Flight 800, a Boeing 747, had just taken off from JFK airport with 230 people aboard on July 17, 1996 enroute to Paris when it exploded
|
Benghazi Whistleblower Lawyer Says Joint Chief’s Chairman Lied to Congress
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Fred Lucas
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/18/2013 8:06:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
An attorney whose firm represents two Benghazi whistleblowers said Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, lied to the Senate when he said there was never a “stand down” order during the Benghazi attack on Sept. 11, 2012. “What was fascinating is that he explained his lie to them,” Joe DiGenova, an attorney representing one of the whistleblowers, told CNSNews.com. “He actually said they were sent to Tripoli. They were needed in Benghazi,” said DiGenova, a former U.S. attorney, now with the Washington firm of DiGenova & Toensing.
|
Obama: ´If Catholics Have Their Schools and Buildings and Protestants Have Theirs ... That Encourages Division´
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Terence P. Jeffrey
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 6/19/2013 3:46:48 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Likening religious schools to segregation--a racist system that forced blacks to attend different schools and use different facilities than whites in the American South--President Barack Obama told a town hall meeting for youth in Belfast, Northern Ireland on Monday that there should not be Catholic and Protestant schools because such schools cause division. "Because issues like segregated schools and housing, lack of jobs and opportunity--symbols of history that are a source of pride for some and pain for others--these are not tangential to peace; they’re essential to it,"
|
Edward Snowden Is In The Process Of Destroying Any Support And Sympathy He Has Built Up
|
|
Business Insider, by Brett LoGiurato
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 6/18/2013 5:34:23 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Amid a steady rise of backlash, Edward Snowden, the 29-year-old former National Security Agency contractor who was the source of a spring of leaks about the agency´s surveillance methods, conducted a live chat on The Guardian´s website Monday morning. Judging from some of the pointed questions he´s been asked and the reaction to newly leaked revelations over the past few days, it´s clear that much of the sympathy and support Snowden had built up for his early exposures is eroding. Many Americans supported his decision to leak information about a pair of National Security Agency surveillance programs, which, he detailed, gathered information
|
G8: Barack Obama looks like a president going through the motions
|
|
Telegraph [UK], by Alex Spillius
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 6/19/2013 4:58:06 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Listening to Barack Obama give his speech in Belfast on Monday, it was hard not to stifle a yawn. I kept waiting for the part when he would say something interesting, but, about three quarters of the way through, realised it wasn’t going to come. Judging from television pictures some of his young audience felt the same, after the initial rush of euphoria of receiving the rock star president in their midst had passed. This is not surprising, for we had already heard this number about the inspirational role of the Northern Ireland peace process and the Emerald Isle’s
|
Paula Deen admits in deposition using N-word, telling racist jokes, reports says
|
|
Fox News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Hobbiest- 6/19/2013 6:03:40 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Celebrity chef Paula Deen admitted in a recorded deposition to telling racist jokes, using the N-word, and planning a slavery-themed wedding, according to multiple reports. The May 17 deposition where she made the alleged admissions is part of a $1.2 million lawsuit brought by Lisa Jackson, the former manager of a Savannah, Georgia, restaurant run by Deen and her brother Bubba Hiers. Jackson alleges in the suit that Deen used the N-word at the restaurant and that Hiers sexually harassed her. According to the reports, in the deposition, Deen replied “Yes, of course,”
|
How Democracies Perish, Deathbed Edition
|
|
American Thinker, by Daren Jonescu
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: steveW- 6/18/2013 6:11:46 AM
Post Reply
|
|
This is the thirtieth anniversary of the publication of How Democracies Perish, an analysis of the spread of world communism by Jean-François Revel, one of freedom´s most serious French defenders since Tocqueville. At the heart of this work, Revel details "The Tools of Communist Expansion," among which the most relevant for understanding our current situation comes in Chapter 16, "Ideological Warfare and Disinformation." The profound simplicity of Revel´s nuts and bolts account of totalitarianism´s Cold War advance, far from being obsolete
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|