|
|
| |
Topic: Hillary’s not so smooth path to the White House |
Hillary’s not so smooth path to the White House
Hot Air, by Jazz Shaw
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:StormCnter, 12/10/2012 4:49:20 AM
|
| The Secretary of State is making all sort of headlines lately, and most of them don’t have much to do with her current job. (A woman with limitless options who is desired by 90% of the Democrats.) The word has hit the streets that Hillary Clinton’s future is pretty much cast in solid gold plated stone. (Snip)I do not like Hillary Clinton. In fact, I pretty much despise her, and have for quite some time. I was angry at her during her time as First Lady when duties involving public policy were essentially handed over to a non-elected
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
ZurichMike, 12/10/2012 5:04:27 AM (No. 9057241)
Four years from now is an eternity in politics. A whole other generation of voters will be saying "Who?" to this craven, almost 70 year-old candiate with unwashed hair, poor hygiene, a horrible, documented track record of failure, and a crackling, grating voice.
No, I don´t think so.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
chumley, 12/10/2012 5:19:52 AM (No. 9057244)
All socialist politics and criminal behavior aside, I bet she and Bill are a hoot at parties. They can have contests to see who brings home the cutest chicks.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Johnny Angle, 12/10/2012 5:27:07 AM (No. 9057246)
Maybe she can dance Gange style through the Benghazi issue and the Arab Spring.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Johnny Angle, 12/10/2012 5:28:36 AM (No. 9057248)
"Gangnam"?? Whatever, I like the image of her doing it.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
ocjim, 12/10/2012 7:23:27 AM (No. 9057302)
Drudge reporting this morning that she is down with a stomach virus. TRANSLATION: She´s going in to get some work done.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Red Jeep, 12/10/2012 7:38:07 AM (No. 9057314)
No not Hillary, the Democrats will run minority presidential candidates from now on after their success with Barry, Maybe they will run a black woman next time like multi millionairess Susan Rice with investments in Iran, or, don´t laugh, Sheila Jackson Lee.
I agree with Reply #1. Four years from now at 70 Piaps will be too old, too wrinkled, and , who knows, might even be indicted for something by then.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
StormCnter, 12/10/2012 7:41:55 AM (No. 9057320)
#1 is right. Hillary´s time has passed. If only she had defeated Obama in 2008. As much as I dislike Mrs. Clinton, I don´t believe she hates this country and she wouldn´t have set out to destroy us.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Scottyboy, 12/10/2012 7:47:55 AM (No. 9057329)
0bama got elected twice. Anything can happen. Hillary will inherit the 0bama machine. They are all fellow travelers bent of screwing America. Don´t understimate these slugs for a second.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
pineledger, 12/10/2012 7:53:47 AM (No. 9057335)
You´re assuming, 8, that The Won isn´t going to issue an Executive Order striking down the 22nd Amendment. Don´t put anything past him.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Pinchem, 12/10/2012 7:55:48 AM (No. 9057341)
People need to keep pounding on her Communist connections, from the SDS and her Alinsky thesis in college, through her employment at a law firm owned by a Card Carrying Member of the Communist Party USA through the present. Don´t forget Bill´s activities while at Rhodes and his connections.
WAIT: I forgot about the Attention Span of Liberal Democrats - 30 seconds or less.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
saucy, 12/10/2012 7:59:55 AM (No. 9057347)
Good women age gracefully....because of a clean heart.
This woman, PIAPS, is NOT gracefull...or good.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
BorninOKC, 12/10/2012 8:07:38 AM (No. 9057361)
I don´t like HC any more than the person who made the first comment. But I remember one pundit´s comment in 2008, that her nomination / election would mean a continuation of the Bush policies to a greater extent than any other Dim. And I remember in 1954 that the election of Eisenhower made some observe that we had an honorable man in the WH rather than the product of corrupt machine politics.
Ironic that some in 2016 some will tout HC as the candididate who would take us back to better times.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
LZK, 12/10/2012 8:27:31 AM (No. 9057384)
Well said poster #1 and #2.......
Merry Christmas everyone!!
LZK
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
southernboy, 12/10/2012 8:29:35 AM (No. 9057388)
Hillary is the same Marxist as Zippy….with focus…and a work ethic for her cause. She would finish the drive of America into the ground of dictatorship.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Catherine, 12/10/2012 8:34:09 AM (No. 9057398)
Unless the Republicans figure out how to stop the mastered art of election stealing by the democrats, I don´t care who runs - the D´s will win. Our whole system needs to be re-vamped.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Arby, 12/10/2012 8:38:07 AM (No. 9057408)
The very thought of seeing that greasy hair and hearing that voice at least once a day makes me cringe. Please, Lord, no PIAPS.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
nonsense, 12/10/2012 8:38:51 AM (No. 9057410)
Soros has unlimited funds to buy the highest office in the land for whatever the communist flavor of the day is.
Just read that the Hildabeast may work for Soros in the future. What a laugh, as if he does not own her already.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
snapper451, 12/10/2012 8:49:24 AM (No. 9057425)
Let´s get at her transcripts and her thesis from college (on communism) and not let up until they are released. Don´t let up on Libya nor Whitewater and how the billing records were hidden in her closet in the White House. We can also talk about Ron Brown and all of the other dead bodies from the Clinton years. We won´t have the press to help us.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Gallo3, 12/10/2012 8:53:30 AM (No. 9057433)
Think it is about time OUR Goldfingers- Adelson, the Koch Bros etc step up and buy Comcast which owns NBC/MSNBC and turn it over to Roger Ailes to help us change the country before the PETUIATE becomes POTUS. Then we need to get a nominee that is first and foremost not a RINO Harvahd or Yale grad.
Sarah, Cruz, Mario, etc. Any Tea Party favorite.
Could do better then Romney/McCain. Maybe even beat Monica´s Boyfriend´s Wife.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
joeyinempirestate, 12/10/2012 8:59:11 AM (No. 9057442)
0 will select the next Dem nominee. It will be himself, his wife or somebody else.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Holeymoses, 12/10/2012 8:59:37 AM (No. 9057443)
Well, as per Drudge, Old Hill has got diarrhea. I´d say that´s a start. (Yes, I know that´s mean.)
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
congaree53, 12/10/2012 9:22:02 AM (No. 9057480)
Ever since Drudge failed miserably in getting his heart- throb Romney elected, his website is starting to look the National Enquirer. I don´t care about Hillary´s GI tract.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
Crosscut, 12/10/2012 9:24:06 AM (No. 9057484)
The GOP should attack Hillary relentlessly until another gomer sticks his or her head up. That´s how the Dems do it. There certainly plenty of mud to dump on her. Particularly with Benghazi gate.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
JAN, 12/10/2012 9:33:29 AM (No. 9057500)
The msm is already planning for the heinous one´s coronation.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
homjett, 12/10/2012 9:43:22 AM (No. 9057513)
I agree with #19´s first sentence. Also, #20 may have it right. Look for Mrs. Obama to run for the Senate from Ill. Or maybe Hawaii. As long as the Repub Party stays divided, an the Economy does not tank, we can expect the Dems to hold the WH for some time. We need the Sen an the House.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
ebuilder, 12/10/2012 9:49:32 AM (No. 9057518)
Some of you are saying the republicans need to learn how to be conservatives. There is no money in it for them.
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
Starlifter Nav, 12/10/2012 9:58:45 AM (No. 9057533)
The Newt story started off my morning by giving me the Yips. Hopefully #1 (and #7, who I hold in high regard) are correct.
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
Hobbiest, 12/10/2012 10:02:53 AM (No. 9057542)
So Hillary has no chance. I fail to take much comfort in that prediction as it mostly seems to be coming from the very same posters who thought Ann Romney was a huge asset to the Republican ticket and Mitt would get elected in a landslide.
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
Reality, 12/10/2012 10:07:27 AM (No. 9057555)
There is a lot of speculation about what Mrs. Slick Willie is going to do after she leaves he cameo role as Secretary of State. I believe that she should go back to a career of doing things that she has experience for. Like rural real estate development or Trading in the futures market
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
BaseballFan, 12/10/2012 10:13:34 AM (No. 9057574)
How soon we forget. In 2004, Obama was pretty much an inexperienced, no account, nobody. Look what the media did for him in just four short years.
Be afraid.
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
M Stuart, 12/10/2012 10:20:41 AM (No. 9057595)
I don´t know what Newt did this morning, but he has been speaking out well in a way that Boehner cannot conceive.
I did NOT however appreciate his saying that Hillary would win easily in 2016 with the R´s in such disarray. Not helpful, Newt!
I wouldn´t vote for Hillary, but Dems think that ugly women are smarter.
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
whyyeseyec, 12/10/2012 10:35:51 AM (No. 9057632)
The next progressive nominee for president in 2016 will be whoever Obama chooses. He isn`t initiating socialism for 8 years only to have it all undone by the next president.
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
larryp, 12/10/2012 10:41:41 AM (No. 9057644)
Obama will run again in 2016 due to the 22nd amendment being scotched bythe Supreme cout. alredy somneN Y legislators are crafting a bill.I read it has 85 sponsors.
|
Reply 34 - Posted by:
enemyofthestate, 12/10/2012 10:58:04 AM (No. 9057663)
Mizzuz Clinton´s resume reads like a bus schedule, but get past her titles, and she has no accomplishments. None whatsoever. The woman travels the world and cannot even find a good hairdresser. But while she was doing that, Benghazi happened.
|
Reply 35 - Posted by:
f64, 12/10/2012 11:38:41 AM (No. 9057736)
In re #33 - Jose E. Serrano, NY16 has introduced that bill in every session of Congress since 1997, regardless of who was/is President. See:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/termlimits.asp
So have several others from both parties. The SCOTUS can´t overturn the 22nd Amendment, it must be repealed by another Amendment passed by both Houses of Congress and ratified by 3/4ths (38) of the States.
|
Reply 36 - Posted by:
glcinpdx, 12/10/2012 11:39:55 AM (No. 9057743)
It won´t be PIAPS, it will be our very own Imelda Marcos: Moochelle Antoinette and her $2000 tennis shoes...
|
Reply 37 - Posted by:
gone2pot, 12/10/2012 12:21:32 PM (No. 9057802)
For now Hillary WILL BE the next president no matter what. The press has already elected her. The only way this will change is if the DNC changes their fax blasts to the Fourth Estate with Van Jones (yes, I mean THAT Van Jones), et al, then he or whoever the DNC deems will be the next president. If you haven´t yet figured it out, elections are nothing more than window dressings from here on out. Saul Alinsky owns the country now and will until we´re taken out. And spare me with the "You´ve given up" nonsense.
|
Reply 38 - Posted by:
bighambone, 12/10/2012 12:37:31 PM (No. 9057826)
It´s not a sure thing that the Democrats will nominate Hillary Clinton in the end, as look what happened last time when Barack Obama showed up out of nowhere. Remember the Democrats need a large black vote to win national elections. So if an Obama clone suddenly shows up and runs against Clinton in the Democrat primaries, and if the Democrats want to win the general election they might be forced to pick the black clone over Clinton to ensure that a big portion of their black base will not feel insulted if Clinton were to knock out their black candidate for the nomination.
The only way to get past that is to nominate Clinton with a black candidate, maybe Michelle Obama as VP on a Clinton ticket. The liberal media would then crow about Clinton winning in 2016 and 2020, with Michelle Obama then keeping the Democrats in the White House through 2024 and 2028.
If that liberal dream were to happen, the resulting progressive agenda would ensure that the USA would be an entirely different country indeed.
|
Reply 39 - Posted by:
Mike6, 12/10/2012 1:08:59 PM (No. 9057881)
Hillary is a liar and incompetent in everything she does. She threw Mubarek under the bus and Mubarek was an American friend who kept the peace for 35 years. It should have been cleat to Hillary that the Muslim Brotherhood would be elecelected in Egypt with +70 of the popular vote. Now the Muslim brotherhood is arming Hamas and may be planning to declare war on Israel. It is going to be a tough summer in Israel. Hillary should stop planning to run for President in 2016. Hillary should retire, bake cookies and keep an eye on Bill before he exposes himself to a younger Paula Jones.
|
Reply 40 - Posted by:
Charactercounts, 12/10/2012 2:36:22 PM (No. 9058042)
After seeing this nation elect Obama, I suppose it´s possible that they´d elect Hillary. But she´ll be 70 years old, and looking pretty ragged by then.
But with the MSM covering for her (cattle futures, Whitewater, her Alinsky-ism, the 900 FBI files, Huma Abedin, Benghazi, and so on), anything could happen.
Did anyone hear Ellen Degeneres asking Christina Aguilera about Hillary checking her breasts out? Christina Aguilera claimed to be equally entranced by Hillary.
|
Reply 41 - Posted by:
ok state mom, 12/10/2012 2:46:51 PM (No. 9058056)
Michelle Obama will be the candidate in 2016. I´m not sure if the GOP needs to even run a candidate.
|
Reply 42 - Posted by:
Ida Lil, 12/10/2012 5:36:37 PM (No. 9058411)
There may be enough men in both parties to stop either Hillary or Michelle simply because they will never accept a woman let known two with such questionable members of the gender. Other than black women for a black I just don´t see the lady parts voters rallying around an old biddy or a dominant black female wanna be. From most the posts on L Dot since the election the GOP factions have to reclaim something missing in the courage and cooperation department to even make the first step into retaining freedom.
|
Reply 43 - Posted by:
Mustang, 12/10/2012 7:08:36 PM (No. 9058540)
The reason Repubs can´t get anyone elected is clearly obvious just by reading this thread.
|
Reply 44 - Posted by:
ketchuplover, 12/10/2012 9:49:01 PM (No. 9058680)
Hillary is not interested in being president. Everyone knows that she is an expert in the cattle futures market....at finding FBI files on her desk........at getting shot at while boarding a plane.......at imitating Black Southern "tired" women...at being a lifetime fan of the Yankees....at pushing (ahem)RESET buttons with former adversaries....at the Olympic lamp-throwing competition....
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"
|
Watergate 2.0 -- why the IRS scandal is far worse
|
|
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,
|
|
The 10 P.M. Phone Call
|
|
National Review Online, by Andrew C. McCarthy
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:39:48 AM
Post Reply
|
|
‘What would you be focusing on in the Benghazi investigation?” I spent many years in the investigation biz, so it’s only natural that I’ve been asked that question a lot lately. I had the good fortune to be trained in Rudy Giuliani’s U.S. attorney’s office in Manhattan. Rudy famously made his mark by making law enforcement reflect what common sense knew: Enterprises take their cues from the top. Criminal enterprises are no different: The capos do not carry out the policy of the button-men — it’s the other way around. So if I were investigating Benghazi,
|
|
Disturbing abuses of power
|
|
Washington Post, by Colbert I. King
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:34:57 AM
Post Reply
|
|
East Germany’s Ministry for State Security, also known as the Stasi, posed a major challenge during my three-year stint as an attache at the U.S. Embassy in Bonn during the 1960s. Detecting and preventing Stasi agents from penetrating the security of U.S. diplomatic facilities in West Germany was a 24-7 undertaking. The East German secret police were even more ruthless and relentless in operations against their own citizens. Political suppression in that communist state was total. There was no room for dissent. Thousands of East Germans were arbitrarily imprisoned for “internal security” reasons.
|
It´s Time To Discuss The Secret CIA Operation At The Heart Of The Benghazi Scandal
|
|
Business Insider, by Michael Kelley & Geoffrey Ingersoll
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:32:12 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In eight months since an attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi left four Americans dead, a Republican-led investigation has focused on potential missteps by the White House — and come away with nothing significant. There has been little attention given, however, to covert actions by the Central Intelligence Agency that were partially uncovered during the September 11, 2012 attack. That may be changing. CNN´s Jake Tapper argued this week that we should give more scrutiny to the CIA´s presence in the Libyan port city. Congressman Frank Wolf (R-Va.) said the same, according to CNN:
|
John Edwards re-emerges, begins public comeback
|
|
Washington Times, by Ben Wolfgang
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:16:32 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Mark Sanford is now a member of Congress two years after he stepped down as governor of South Carolina following a highly publicized extramarital affair. Anthony Weiner appears poised to run for New York City mayor not even two years after scandalous photos of the ex-representative hit Twitter. Perhaps, then, it should be no surprise to learn that disgraced former presidential candidate and North Carolina senator John Edwards is plotting his own comeback. The wealthy lawyer has reactivated his law license and also is hitting the speaking circuit, The Associated Press reported. Mr. Edwards is scheduled
|
|
Did Oprah make O.J. snap?
|
|
New York Post, by Emily Smith
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:13:24 AM
Post Reply
|
|
O.J. Simpson testified this week that he’d been drinking all day on Sept. 13, 2007, before he bizarrely robbed two sports memorabilia dealers in a Las Vegas hotel. But sources close to the case wonder if it was watching “The Oprah Winfrey Show” that afternoon that made Simpson snap. Before Simpson headed to the Palace Station Hotel to rob the dealers, the family of Ronald Goldman, who was murdered along with Simpson’s ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson, were on “Oprah” to discuss the controversial book “If I Did It: Confessions of the Killer.” It was a repackaged version of a “fictitious”
|
Who Actually Cracked Linear B, the Ancient Code of the Mysterious Knossos Labyrinth?
|
|
Daily Beast, by Malcolm Jones
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 4:58:46 AM
Post Reply
|
|
As Margalit Fox says at the outset of The Riddle of the Labyrinth, the story of Linear B is well known. This 3,000-year-old language was discovered on clay tablets excavated in 1900 on the island of Crete. It thereafter puzzled scholars for half a century before it was decoded by Michael Ventris, an English architect with no formal training in archeology or linguistics. Linear B’s history is an absorbing tale, full of mysteries both intellectual and historical, and it’s been told and retold since Ventris made his breakthrough. The problem, as Fox sees it,
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Raindrops wash away reeling O’s fake veneer
|
|
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons
|
Obama a new Nixon? Oh, get serious.
|
|
Washington Post, by Editorial
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/16/2013 10:54:51 PM
Post Reply
|
|
STANDING BEFORE reporters Thursday, President Obama declined an invitation to compare the recent scandals weighing down his administration with those that forced President Nixon to resign in 1974. So allow us to do the work for him: There is no comparison. Nixon, in a series of crimes that collectively came to be known as Watergate, directed from the White House and Justice Department a concerted campaign against those he perceived as political enemies, in the process subverting the FBI, the IRS, other government agencies and the electoral process to his nefarious purposes. Mr. Obama has done nothing of the kind.
|
Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.
|
|
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,
|
NBC´s Todd Warns: If GOP Investigates Obama Scandals, ´The Voters Will Punish Them´
|
|
Newsbusters, by Kyle Drennen
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/16/2013 1:51:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
On Thursday´s NBC Today, in a desperate attempt to deflect from the scandals engulfing the Obama administration, co-host Savannah Guthrie wondered: "I read a headline yesterday that said Republicans see blood in the water. That they see a president who´s very vulnerable politically. Is there a danger that they will overreach?" Chief White House correspondent Chuck Todd agreed with the slanted premise: "There is. I mean, that´s what happened to Republicans in 1998 with Bill Clinton.
|
When it rains, it pours: Ten press conference take aways
|
|
Washington Post, by Jennifer Rubin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/17/2013 4:52:42 AM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama’s press conference in the rain was not a success, if by success, his supporters would mean an event which convinces anyone who doesn’t work for him that he’s getting ahead of the scandal deluge. The sight of a Marine holding an umbrella over his head only added to the weirdness of the event. So what did we learn? 1. He has full confidence in Attorney General Eric Holder, the man who purportedly recused himself (whenever) without putting it in writing (whatever). When asked about the untrammeled snooping on Associated Press reporters and editors,
|
Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice"
|
|
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.
|
Obama 47 minutes late for his press conference; leaves reporters in the rain
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/16/2013 1:20:06 PM
Post Reply
|
|
“I look forward to taking some questions at tomorrow’s press conference,” President Obama said last night, after announcing the resignation of the acting IRS commissioner Steven Miller. The president scheduled a noon press conference today with Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan in honor of his visit. Reporters, however, found themselves waiting outside in the rain for Obama, who was 47 minutes late. Only New York Times reporter Mark Landler had an umbrella.
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|